Re: Acting on message text strings

2000-11-25 Thread Kevin Tea

Hi  Charlie 

 Just thinking out load, why don't you get the form handling cgi to
 post the form data direct to the member of staff? It seems more
 logical to me Kevin.

It does that. When the incoming mail arrives the filter actions 
generates a forward email to the client. I then manually pick out the 
enquirer's email address from the form and email a thank you response. 
What I am hoping to do is do this latter bit automatically so I can 
still remain being seen as a vital cog in the wheel by my client and 
not be surgically attached to the computer g.


Regards

Kevin
Batting along with 1.4b Beta 8

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Acting on message text strings

2000-11-25 Thread Charlie (ceejay)

Hi Kevin,
 On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, at 08:31:29 [GMT +] you wrote:

 Just thinking out load, why don't you get the form handling cgi to
 post the form data direct to the member of staff? It seems more
 logical to me Kevin.

KT It does that. When the incoming mail arrives the filter actions 
KT generates a forward email to the client. I then manually pick out the

There may be something of a misunderstanding here Kevin. To clarify,
are you saying that the formmail.cgi (or whichever) is sending the
form data to *your* email address?

-- 
 Charlie (ceejay)

Wales (UK)
PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP Auto Decrypt

2000-11-25 Thread Gerd Ewald

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Brian Clark !


On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 21:34:05 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 25.11.2000, 03:34 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:

[...]

GE If so you go to Tools.PGP.PGPPreferences, there you see several tab
GE folders; one should be called "HotKeys". There you should find what you are
GE looking for.

 Been there. No HotKeys tab. Nothing about HotKeys in the whole
 Preferences dialog of PGP.

Although these entries aren't necessary as we learned from Marck's posting,
I'm still interested where this tabfolder is. But I think we should take
this part Off-List to be able to send attachment, screenshots...

Apart from this, I have no idea why it does not work with your version. A
friend of uses Halloween edition on a NT system without any problem with
short cut's.

Did you probably redefine your short cuts?? It is possible to define own
windows-based short cuts: may be you accidently over wrote
Ctrl-Shift-D/-C??



- --
Best regards,
 Gerd
==
Using The Bat! Version 1.48 Beta/8
PGP-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key
- 
Erwerbsregel #284
Tief im Innern ist jeder ein Ferengi.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for authentication purposes ! Gerd Ewald

iQA/AwUBOh9zwUy/sHrVbGGHEQKn7wCglK7YdDBduHrsZRJ75ha8990uF2IAoLxm
HQOH4iRz6xcph/xu/g729rUp
=KIcM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: on reply, nothing gets quoted for me. why?

2000-11-25 Thread Charlie Laidlaw

Hello Thomas,

it  is  content type:text/html, composed on the hotmail service.  i've
stuck it down the bottom for you to have a look if you like

i  thought a 'multipart' message would be good, in that the Bat! could
successfully quote the text part of it?

Saturday, November 25, 2000, 7:02:45 AM, you wrote:

TF Hallo Charlie,

TF On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:45:32 +1100 GMT (25/11/2000, 03:45 +0800 GMT),
TF Charlie Laidlaw wrote:

JA This is not a reliable check.  TB will automatically *create* a plain
JA text version if there is only a HTML version.  The only way to check
JA is to export the message to a Unix mailbox and view it with a text
JA editor (eg Notepad).

CL yeah,  all  i  see  is the kludges then the message surrounded by html
CL gibberish (well to me it is :)

TF Watch out for this:

CL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

TF On an HTML mail, it will show Content-type: HTML/alternative (good) or
TF HTML/multipart (not good).

From: "Ant X" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Huh Univega?
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:31:25 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2000 09:31:25.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[263D0BE0:01C05530]

htmlDIVHi Charlie,/DIV
DIVsorry a small mail tonight...Im sitting the kids./DIV
DIVI have never seen Univegas with a headshok style suspension./DIV
DIVWeird./DIV
DIVCould you find a english version of the site.?/DIV
DIVBack to Bris really early in the morning./DIV
DIVThen the conversion happens frantically./DIV
DIVI hope all is well./DIV
DIVIf tomorrow goes mad I shant be emailing untill Saturday./DIV
DIVtake care buddy/DIV
DIVmuch affection/DIV
DIVAnt/DIV DIVp.s. remind me to rave about Reboot bext
email./DIVbr clear=allhrGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer
download : a
href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr/p/html

-- 
Best regards,
 Charliemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




addressing: possible to edit other names that recipients see?

2000-11-25 Thread Charlie Laidlaw

hello,
 i'm  wondering  if  it is possible to select what other cc recipients
 will see, ie: nickname, proper name, or address?

 also,  if  i  post a mail with a lot of addresses in bcc, do they see
 each other's name?

-- 
Best regards,
 Charliemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: addressing: possible to edit other names that recipients see?

2000-11-25 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Charlie,

On 25 November 2000 at 22:39:39 +1100 (which was 11:39 where I
live) Charlie Laidlaw wrote and made these points:

To begin, I will paste in here a recent "Moderator's nag":
- -8-
Please start all new topics by creating a brand new message.

Do *not* just reply to an existing message and change the subject.

TB is a threading mail client. Most of the readers here use threading
to sort messages.

Whenever anyone replies to a message, it is becomes threaded down the
tree and inappropriately placed for all time.

This will have the following effects:

1) Your message will be ignored by those not following that thread.
2) Everyone's threading for that message will be messed up.
3) You may not get the answers your questions deserve.
4) Threading purists will get annoyed.

So once again, please don't do this.
- -8-

This note is included in the Welcome message you get when you join the
list. Now, to the questions:

CL i'm wondering if it is possible to select what other cc recipients
CL will see, ie: nickname, proper name, or address?

To  and  CC  recipients  will  see differing things depending on their
email  client. If your recipient is using Outlook or OE then they will
see the "RealName" part of To and CC addresses only (if specified) or,
if there is no "RealName" then the email address.

CL  also,  if  i  post a mail with a lot of addresses in bcc, do they see
CL  each other's name?

Only  the  individual receiving the message sees their own name if was
in  a  BCC.  That's  the purpose of BCC, to send a message to multiple
recipients whereby none see the address of the others.

- --
 Cheers,
 .\\arck
 
[Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[ PGP Key: http://www.silverstones.com/MarckPGP.asc  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]
 
TB! v1.48 Beta/7 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOh+54jnkJKuSnc2gEQLrOACfbOJlKsHo21S973iGXDrb7cYpMKEAoJBn
4vKba2+fc+V3NW9XfdeVv7Yy
=YtAf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: using RexExp in filters

2000-11-25 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thomas,

   On Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 13:43:47 +0800, you wrote the
   following about "using RexExp in filters"


Thomas You would put it into the "String" condition. when you have
Thomas ticked Regular Expressions under Options, the String condition
Thomas will be interpreted as a RegEx and not as a string.

Thanks for this  enjoyed the "crypto" reply as well.  And you're
right, it was the English who used the Enigma to break the German
codes.

- --
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOh/WoJccVS5MnN+dEQIwTwCg6zptbp7i4J4S4uWjbQkbgVCdU54Ani0x
VPzN1WwpyUxOGc/MwUtco8LQ
=zRJZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Default browser

2000-11-25 Thread Karin Spaink

On 25-11-2000 at 06:33, Thomas Fernandez kindly wrote:
 Karin Spaink wrote:

KS This question was answered *twice* today.

 And you answered it again for him... you have an adorable patience.
 ;-)

You people on the list have shown the same patience to me
when I barged in here, going cold turkey on Eudora ;-)


- K -

-- 

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words 
mean so many different things.' 
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be 
master - that's all.' 
  - Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking-Glass



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: RegExp to eliminate duplicates

2000-11-25 Thread Allie Martin

On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:07:50 -0500, Jan Rifkinson wrote these
words of wisdom:

JR I belong to 3 groups that focus on a particular subject. Each group
JR has a slightly different approach which is why I belong to all 3
JR instead of just one.

JR However, at times someone may publish the identical email to all three
JR lists  I would like to know if there is a RegExp that can handle the
JR problem of eliminating the duplicate messages.

Each message is treated independently of another where filtering is
concerned. You can't tell a filter to do an action depending
characteristics of previous messages filtered.

JR I know there is a "kill dupes" menu function but since the headers are
JR not identical (although the message is) I'm assuming this TB! facility
JR won't work in this case although I haven't tried it.

The headers may be different but the message ID's the same. If the same
message is sent to different lists, the message ID could still be
intact if the senders mail client generates the message ID.
 
-- 
A. Curtis Martin [TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator]
PGP Key:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

'I'm not paranoid! Which of my enemies told you this?'
__
TB! v1.48 Beta/8 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP Auto Decrypt

2000-11-25 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:46:27 -0500, Brian Clark wrote these
words of wisdom:

GE Ctrl-Shift-D Decrypt and Verify (lookout: the DLL creates a decrypted copy
GE of the msg and leaves the encrypted one untouched)

GE Ctrl-Shift-C Verify signature

BC Hey hey, this isn't working for me.. :\

BC Ctrl+Shift+D does nada.. is it something I've done? :-)

Make sure the message in the message list is in focus when using these
shortcuts. If the message viewer is in focus they don't work. Another
small short coming for Ritlabs to work out. These shortcuts really aught
to work whether the message or it's body is in focus.

BC Is there some place I can get a list of ALL of the shortcuts for TB!?

Yes. Via the TB! FAQ pages:

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html

- --
@~@@~@
 | A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA]  |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@

'Using yesterday's technology to solve today's problems, tomorrow'
__
TB! v1.48 Beta/8 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOh7+TfAXeSHuB5k3EQLsogCcCyghQ07SxFtlK78TU+9h9bq2z3sAnRmJ
ZZstbax05UsKY7wBXYoMCbBt
=98o1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: RegExp to eliminate duplicates

2000-11-25 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hi Allie,

   On Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 10:34:00 -0500, you wrote the
   following about "RegExp to eliminate duplicates"
  

Allie [...] The headers may be different but the message ID's the
Allie same. If the same message is sent to different lists, the
Allie message ID could still be intact if the senders mail client
Allie generates the message ID. [...]

Thanks for your response, Allie. I tried the kill dupes option  some
files were eliminated but as it "kills" these files, I have no way to
be sure that the appropriate files were eliminated @ this moment but I
will test it again.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[3]: using RexExp in filters

2000-11-25 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hi Thomas,

   On Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 10:11:18 -0500, you wrote the
   following about "using RexExp in filters"
  

Thomas You would put it into the "String" condition. when you have
Thomas ticked Regular Expressions under Options, the String
Thomas condition will be interpreted as a RegEx and not as a string.

I am reading a book on RegExp with little luck as I'm afraid its a
little above my head but I'm trying with a very simple filter that is
not working. Perhaps you or someone else can tell me what's wrong.

I created a "test" filter  a "test" folder
The "test"filter was to send filtered files to the "test" folder under
filtered circumstances

The filter is for Incoming Mail (at the bottom of the list)
Under options tab, regular expressions was selected
Action = move to "test" folder

The test filter rule I constructed is:
string = ^[^JjAaNn]   location = kludges   present = no

The regexp was meant to express:
At the beginning of the string
If not J (or) j followed by A (or) a followed by N (or) n
is found in the kludges
then send to "test" folder

What's the matter with this simple regexp? TIA

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Help! missing half of my mail

2000-11-25 Thread syv

Hi Thomas,

...
TF Hallo syv,

TF On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 13:53:48 -0800 GMT (25/11/2000, 05:53 +0800 GMT),
TF syv wrote:

s I had to restart the computer. I lost the mail for a dozen
s folders.

TF Bummer. Never happened here, and I restart my computer all the time (I
TF use Wondows, you see...)

s How can I recover it?

s Somebody else had that problem, I saved these message in
s thebat folder. But it's one of the folder that lost all the
s mail.

TF So, the folder is still physically on the HD? Can you access the
TF account.tbb file with a text editor? If so, and the mails are still
TF there, the problem is that TB doesn't find it. If the folder is not
TF there, it's been deleted, and we have another problem. Let's establish
TF first which problem we are facing.


...

The folders are still here. Yes, I can open the TBB files
with my editor.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

REAL PROBLEMS / REAL SOLUTION
ISSN: 1492-7829

A free weekly newsletter on Windows and networking
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.911networks.com

Copyright 1999-2000 by 911networks.com - All Rights Reserved

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: using RexExp in filters

2000-11-25 Thread Allie Martin

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:14:13 -0500, Jan Rifkinson wrote these
words of wisdom:

JR The test filter rule I constructed is:
JR string = ^[^JjAaNn]   location = kludges   present = no

JR The regexp was meant to express:
JR At the beginning of the string
JR If not J (or) j followed by A (or) a followed by N (or) n
JR is found in the kludges
JR then send to "test" folder

JR What's the matter with this simple regexp? TIA

^[^JjAaNn]

Well, you've only denoted a character class and the initial '^'
restricts the regex to matching only strings that start a new line in
the Kludges.

From what you said above, it would seem that you want all messages that
do not have 'Jan' (case insensitive) in the Kludges moved to the test
folder. I assume you wouldn't want the expression to cover string
matches like:

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
Januk Aggarwal
^^^

"Michael S. Greenbaum" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ^^^
Organization: Janus Books, Ltd.
  ^^^

By default filter associated regex's are case insensitive but an
expression that should work is (?i)\bjan\b|jan@\S*

It will however catch messages with a January date:

25 Jan 2000
   ^^^
To prevent this one could add:

(?!)(?!\d\d\s)jan(?!\s\d{4})|jan@\S*

-- 
A. Curtis Martin [TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator]
PGP Key:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

'Individualists of the world, UNITE!'
__
TB! v1.48 Beta/8 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: using RexExp in filters

2000-11-25 Thread Jan Rifkinson

Hi Allie,

   On Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 11:56:58 -0500, you wrote the
   following about "using RexExp in filters"
  

Allie ^[^JjAaNn]

Allie Well, you've only denoted a character class and the initial '^'
Allie restricts the regex to matching only strings that start a new
Allie line in the Kludges.

Allie From what you said above, it would seem that you want all
Allie messages that do not have 'Jan' (case insensitive) in the
Allie Kludges moved to the test folder.

I am taking this one small step @ a time. What you describe was my
intention however this action was not working so I'm wondering if it
is because the leading '^' denoting the beginning of any line in
kludges should not be there as 'Jan' (case insensitive) might appear
in the middle of a line or after "To:" or "cc:". What do you think,
Allie?

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition
PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Images embeded in HTML doesn't display.

2000-11-25 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, November 24, 2000, 12:15:29 PM, Thomas wrote:

ACM "One approach is to send the victim an e-mail message that
ACM contains what is known as a webbug or tracking GIF. This is a
ACM URL referring to an image file

 They are better than that. An HTML file can contain an image than is
 one pixel big, but contains an FTP command. This way, you FTP some
 info to the server without even knowing it.

Hmmm, is there any documentation about this? AFAIK, no IMG or HREF
command can be used to upload information. Yes, you can embed a FTP
command in an IMG link, but it can only be used to download things.
Or am I missing something?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: encryption q's (messages.tbb etc.)

2000-11-25 Thread Ming-Li

On Friday, November 24, 2000, 9:58:48 PM, Thomas wrote:

JR I don't know enough to discuss the point mathematically or with
JR any great knowledge, but I have the following observations
JR about the one time pad if I understood what I read. In the
JR first place the key has to be larger than the text which makes
JR it a little impractical for some uses

 I didn't read that article, but in practice, people would start
 reusing the key from the beginning if the text is larger than the key.

I think you both misunderstand what one-time-pad is. :) In a true
one-time-pad system, the key is exactly of the same length of the
text. (In the article Alex quoted in his first post, the key length
is one "block" longer, and the extra block is used to signify where
in the "code book" one should start, and is not part of the
encrypting key.)

Because with the OTP system, every bit is encrypted with a random
bit, it's unbreakable ASSUMING the code book isn't intercepted,
which is the weak link as both of you have pointed out. The code
book also has to be very large because each key can be used only
once, and the key has to be as long as the text. Hence OTP, while
ideal in theory, isn't very practical in day-to-day encryption
practice. It's used only sparingly for extremely important purposes.

One other thing. OTP is a symmetric system, so you and each one
you're communicating with need a common code book to begin with.

 By the way, if anybody has ever seen the film U-571, this whole
 thing was the point of stealing the enigma machine. Messages could
 not be decrypted when intercepted, so the Americans needed the
 machine, as the one-time pads were stored in there.

I haven't seen the film, but I have seen two documentary about the
Enigma machine (one is actually about Allen Turing). The Enigma
isn't a true OTP system, since they reuse the key. And stealing the
machine itself isn't enough, they had to know the code used to
synchronize two machines in communication. Fortunately (or
unfortunately for Nazis), they were too lazy to change the code
often, and they (the Navy especially, IIRC) delivered the code in a
careless way.

 (Historically the film was nonsense, as the Americans were not
 even in the war at the time this film claims to be set. Never
 mind, that's Hollywood.)

According to the documentary I saw, the Americans, while not
officially in the war at the time, were indeed cooperating with the
Brits in solving the Enigma. (IIRC, it's a Polish underground
operation that stole the machine, and sold it to the Brits. Too bad
I've recycled the tape, and I have never been known for good
memories. :( Sorry, folks. Perhaps someone others have seen those
documentaries on PBS.)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.48 Beta/7 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: using RexExp in filters

2000-11-25 Thread Allie Martin

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 13:51:37 -0500, Jan Rifkinson wrote these
words of wisdom:

JROn Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 11:56:58 -0500, you wrote the
JRfollowing about "using RexExp in filters"
  

Allie ^[^JjAaNn]

Allie Well, you've only denoted a character class and the initial '^'
Allie restricts the regex to matching only strings that start a new
Allie line in the Kludges.

Allie From what you said above, it would seem that you want all
Allie messages that do not have 'Jan' (case insensitive) in the
Allie Kludges moved to the test folder.

JR I am taking this one small step @ a time. What you describe was my
JR intention however this action was not working so I'm wondering if it
JR is because the leading '^' denoting the beginning of any line in
JR kludges should not be there as 'Jan' (case insensitive) might appear
JR in the middle of a line or after "To:" or "cc:". What do you think,
JR Allie?

Not only that. The second part of the expression "[^JjAaNn]" is just a
character class which will not yield anything. You haven't quantified
how many characters to match from the class defined.

-- 
A. Curtis Martin [TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator]
PGP Key:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

'Half of the people in the world are below average.'
__
TB! v1.48 Beta/8 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: encryption q's (messages.tbb etc.)

2000-11-25 Thread Michael P. Wilson

Hello Ming-Li,

This is one of those times where I'm pretty happy that people aren't
real retentive about being off topic :)

The catch-22 about OTP is that the security of the key is then subject
to the same problems as the original communication.  It doesn't make
much sense to start OTPing your OTP.

Turtles turtles turtles, all the way down :)

- M



Saturday, November 25, 2000, 1:55:17 PM, you wrote:

ML On Friday, November 24, 2000, 9:58:48 PM, Thomas wrote:

JR I don't know enough to discuss the point mathematically or with
JR any great knowledge, but I have the following observations
JR about the one time pad if I understood what I read. In the
JR first place the key has to be larger than the text which makes
JR it a little impractical for some uses

 I didn't read that article, but in practice, people would start
 reusing the key from the beginning if the text is larger than the key.

ML I think you both misunderstand what one-time-pad is. :) In a true
ML one-time-pad system, the key is exactly of the same length of the
ML text. (In the article Alex quoted in his first post, the key length
ML is one "block" longer, and the extra block is used to signify where
ML in the "code book" one should start, and is not part of the
ML encrypting key.)

ML Because with the OTP system, every bit is encrypted with a random
ML bit, it's unbreakable ASSUMING the code book isn't intercepted,
ML which is the weak link as both of you have pointed out. The code
ML book also has to be very large because each key can be used only
ML once, and the key has to be as long as the text. Hence OTP, while
ML ideal in theory, isn't very practical in day-to-day encryption
ML practice. It's used only sparingly for extremely important purposes.

ML One other thing. OTP is a symmetric system, so you and each one
ML you're communicating with need a common code book to begin with.

 By the way, if anybody has ever seen the film U-571, this whole
 thing was the point of stealing the enigma machine. Messages could
 not be decrypted when intercepted, so the Americans needed the
 machine, as the one-time pads were stored in there.

ML I haven't seen the film, but I have seen two documentary about the
ML Enigma machine (one is actually about Allen Turing). The Enigma
ML isn't a true OTP system, since they reuse the key. And stealing the
ML machine itself isn't enough, they had to know the code used to
ML synchronize two machines in communication. Fortunately (or
ML unfortunately for Nazis), they were too lazy to change the code
ML often, and they (the Navy especially, IIRC) delivered the code in a
ML careless way.

 (Historically the film was nonsense, as the Americans were not
 even in the war at the time this film claims to be set. Never
 mind, that's Hollywood.)

ML According to the documentary I saw, the Americans, while not
ML officially in the war at the time, were indeed cooperating with the
ML Brits in solving the Enigma. (IIRC, it's a Polish underground
ML operation that stole the machine, and sold it to the Brits. Too bad
ML I've recycled the tape, and I have never been known for good
ML memories. :( Sorry, folks. Perhaps someone others have seen those
ML documentaries on PBS.)



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Mailbox Import Wizard no longer sees Eudora mailboxes

2000-11-25 Thread David Perrotta

I'm using the Halloween edition for Windows95.  I
recently used the Mailbox Import Wizard to bring over
some messages from my installation of Eudora Pro 3.05.


It worked flawlessly the first time, but now when I
try to do the same thing again, the wizard only
identifies three Eudora mailboxes -- IN, OUT, and
TRASH.  

The problem is that I have many more mailboxes and
folders than that, but for some reason TB is not
recognizing them any longer.

I'd appreciate any suggestions for how to solve this.

best regards,
-David Perrotta

 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Kill Dupes function

2000-11-25 Thread Joseph Then

Hi! Just wanted to find out how did The Bat! kill the dupes? Under what criteria
it kills them?

Same subject? Same creation time? Or exact match in all areas?

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Images embeded in HTML doesn't display.

2000-11-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo Ming-Li,

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:59:17 -0800 GMT (26/11/2000, 02:59 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:

 They are better than that. An HTML file can contain an image than is
 one pixel big, but contains an FTP command. This way, you FTP some
 info to the server without even knowing it.

ML Hmmm, is there any documentation about this?

Yes, I got it from an antispam website. I don't remember the URL,
though, but if I come across it again, I will let you know.

ML AFAIK, no IMG or HREF command can be used to upload information.
ML Yes, you can embed a FTP command in an IMG link, but it can only
ML be used to download things. Or am I missing something?

Yes, they get your email address when you connect to their FTP server,
and that's all they want at the moment, for future use (or just to
sell it).

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Help! missing half of my mail

2000-11-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo syv,

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:54:22 -0800 GMT (26/11/2000, 00:54 +0800 GMT),
syv wrote:

s The folders are still here. Yes, I can open the TBB files
s with my editor.

That's a relief. Now go to Account / Properties / FilesDirectories.
Look whether this is the same path as where the files are actually
located on the HD. If not, correct it.

If the path is correct but still no mails show up in the folders,
make sure that View / Display / All Messages is checked.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

"Nitrogen is not found in Ireland because it is not found in a free state"

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: on reply, nothing gets quoted for me. why?

2000-11-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez

Hallo Charlie,

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 21:06:31 +1100 GMT (25/11/2000, 18:06 +0800 GMT),
Charlie Laidlaw wrote:

CL it  is  content type:text/html, composed on the hotmail service.  i've
CL stuck it down the bottom for you to have a look if you like

CL i  thought a 'multipart' message would be good, in that the Bat! could
CL successfully quote the text part of it?

Have I mixed soemthing up? I'm not an RFC guru, but I do remember that
there was one kind of HTML message that had "alternative" in the
content-type header, and the other kind of HTML message didn't.
Mustn't HTML always be multipart?

The point is, in an alternative-type message, the message is actually
sent to you twice: once as an HTML message, and once as a good honest
correct text message. If you hit Reply on this message, the %Quotes
macro will return the text message but not the alternative HTML
message.

If you do not have a text message but only the HTML message, the
%Quote macro has nothing to return, as it does not read the HTML
message.

When you disable HTML autoview, you will see a plain-text version,
regardless of whether a text version was sent or not. this is because
TB fakes the text version in the display if there isn't one. I
suggested that the %Quotes macro use this fake when there is no real
text message, but for some reason, I was alone. So that's why you have
to cut and paste on those messages.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

"The moon is a planet just like the earth, only it is even deader."

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Kill Dupes function

2000-11-25 Thread Joseph Then

Hello Januk,

How was the ID created for each message?

Sunday, November 26, 2000, 2:07:50 PM, you wrote:

JA Hello Joseph,

JA On  Sun, 26 Nov 2000  at  14:06:18 GMT +0800 (which was 10:06 PM
JA where I live) witnesses say Joseph Then typed:

 Hi! Just wanted to find out how did The Bat! kill the dupes? Under what criteria
 it kills them?

 Same subject? Same creation time? Or exact match in all areas?

JA Same Message-ID.

 


-- 
Best regards,
Joseph Then  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org