Re: IFrame.Exploit virus

2002-04-20 Thread tracer

Hello Mrten,
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:25:00 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, April 19, 2002, 11:25:00 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,




Mrten wrote:


 Om 18:09 op vrijdag 19 april 2002, David van Zuijlekom:

 Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and
 re-activate Norton?

 I guess I could I am just worried that doing this it could do some
 damages in my machine.

 A virus can't do a thing without your interaction. If you don't
 execute it nothing can happen. So you can safely disable Norton and
 delete the file.

 err! do not delete the file or you'll be losing all messages in your inbox!

Why? never had problems deleting a file from an inbox



-- 

Best regards,
 
tracer

Using theBAT 1.60c 

mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.C.S. Associates
FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: IFrame.Exploit virus

2002-04-20 Thread tracer

Hello Corobori,
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:57:52 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, April 19, 2002, 10:57:52 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,




Corobori wrote:


 Hello Gerard,

 Friday, April 19, 2002, 11:30:57 AM, you wrote:

G Hi  Jean-Luc,  Cab't  you disable Norton, then delete the email and
G re-activate Norton?

 I  guess  I  could  I am just worried that doing this it could do some
 damages  in  my  machine. Even on Norton's website they don't describe
 what   the  IFrame.Exploit  virus  does  !  NAV  says:  No  additional
 information and Likelihood: Rate


If I remember correctly its a potential security hole possible to fix
via MS update. Warning doesnt mean you are infected, but means you
COULD get infected on the wrong webpage if the AV wasnt running...




-- 

Best regards,
 
tracer

Using theBAT 1.60c 

mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.C.S. Associates
FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Corrupted attachements

2002-04-20 Thread Luc

 Good morning tracer,
  
It was foretold that on 21-4-2002 @ 07:30:03 GMT+0700 (which was
2:30:03 where I live) tracer wrote and spread these wise comments on
Corrupted attachements:
  
snipped a bit
t What format are they??
t Shouldnt matter but on the other hand try saving to hard disk, just in
t case your cdrom writer or cd has a problem...

 CD problem :-(
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.

When a thing has been said and said well, have no scruple. Take it
and copy it. Anatole France (1844-1924).




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: error message from email

2002-04-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Paul,

On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 7:55:18 PM you wrote (at least in part):

PC I'm not sure what happened here. I know I replied to a message that
PC was sent to me, I'm looking in my sent folder and the message says it
PC was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , yet here is the error message I
PC received:
PC The original message was received at Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:50:54 -0500 (CDT)
PC from IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[212.56.195.233]

PC- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
PC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PC (reason: 541 Failure: this address is blacklisted)

Seems there's an forwarding of mails directed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' set up on RITs mail server.

I'd suggest you write a note to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and inform about
this issue and when you sent your original mail and ask if you should
re-sent the mail or if it was caught by a mail distributor and already
delivered additionally to the error message you got.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1)

How wonderful opera would be if there were no singers.



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: A good tool: Win32.Klez worm sent by me via The Bat!?

2002-04-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Mike,

On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 11:20:37 PM you wrote (at least in part):

MH A colleague of mine has just received a message from me (without my
MH knowledge of sending it) which appears to be related to the Win32.Klez
MH worm.

MH There was no attachment from me.

MH How could this happen with TB? I don't use Outlook, and I thought that
MH this worm exploited Outlook. I am VERY vigilant about attachments, and
MH have TB! set up to not allow opening of
MH *.COM,*.EML,*.CMD,*.JS,*.PL,*.BAS,*.JAVA,*.REG,
MH *.EXE,*.VBS,*.PIF,*.SCR,*.SHS files.

First: if TB! would have sent this message it will resist in your
'Sent' folder. Have a look there ... (Albeit I can't believe TB! has
been sent it, have a look to be sure).

Second: You write you're not _using_ Outlook. Do you have it installed
anyway and maybe some aeons ago configured to work properly? Does
Outlook (if installed) or Outlook Express have knowledge about your
account data (name, e-mail-address, SMTP-server)?

The 'Received:' headers look like it were your computer having sent
this mail (same IP, sadly no HELO oder EHLO string :-( ).

But there're 'In-Reply-To:' and 'References:' headers too ... quite
unusual as even if the worm could have used MAPI-interface without you
recognizing (which I can't imagine, btw) how should it know about the
original message ID? It will have to be able to read the TB! message
database format to figure out that ... and I've not read 'Klez' is able
to do so ...

You have written 'There was no attachment from me.' ... does that mean
the recipient had no attachment in the mail? If so there's no 'Klez'
issue we could talk about, as 'Klez' is spreading itself and not
sending empty messages :-)

To come to an end: I'd suggest updating the signature file and re-scan
your whole system again. Installing a second AV-software would be also
a good idea, in case there's a new variant of Klez around NAV has not
yet in the signature file.
E.g.
http://www.free-av.com/ (which is _really_ slow over here)
the (faster) direct download links are:

Win9x
http://www.free-av.de/personal/en/win9x/avwin9xp.exe

Win2000/XP
http://www.free-av.de/personal/en/winnt/avwinntp.exe
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1)

Gone back into the darkness



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Corrupted attachements

2002-04-20 Thread tracer

Hello Luc,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:42:47 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, April 20, 2002, 7:42:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,




Luc wrote:


  Good night list,
   
  The last few days i have a strange problem: if i receive pics as an
  attachment and i save them from TB! directly to a cd, they become
  corrupted. This causes my cd drive to freeze up and even my pc. I
  don't think it's a virus because my AV didn't gave me a warning.
  Also, it doesn't matter who sends me the pics. It's the same problem
  with different senders.

  Has anybody a clue what this could be?

What format are they??
Shouldnt matter but on the other hand try saving to hard disk, just in
case your cdrom writer or cd has a problem...
 


-- 

Best regards,
 
tracer

Using theBAT 1.60c 

mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.C.S. Associates
FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: A good tool: Win32.Klez worm sent by me via The Bat!?

2002-04-20 Thread Mike Harlos

Hello Peter,

Thanks very much for your reply.

 First: if TB! would have sent this message it will resist in your
 'Sent' folder. Have a look there ... (Albeit I can't believe TB! has
 been sent it, have a look to be sure).

I believe you are correct.. it was not in my sent folder. I have been
looking for more information on this worm and I read on alt.comp.virus
that it forges the From header, making it look as though it came
from an individual.

 Second: You write you're not _using_ Outlook. Do you have it
 installed anyway and maybe some aeons ago configured to work
 properly? Does Outlook (if installed) or Outlook Express have
 knowledge about your account data (name, e-mail-address,
 SMTP-server)?

Outlook had been installed when my laptop was initially configured by
the computer folks at work. I've never actually started it up or
configured it; I've used TB! for a few years.

 You have written 'There was no attachment from me.' ... does that mean
 the recipient had no attachment in the mail? If so there's no 'Klez'
 issue we could talk about, as 'Klez' is spreading itself and not
 sending empty messages :-)

She originally indicated that there was no attachment, and upon
reexamining it in her trash folder (of her Outlook program), said
there was one. She deleted it without taking note of its name or
extension.

 To come to an end: I'd suggest updating the signature file and re-scan
 your whole system again. Installing a second AV-software would be also
 a good idea, in case there's a new variant of Klez around NAV has not
 yet in the signature file.

Thanks. I registered KAV (because of its integration with TB!), and
scanned my system. It identified Exploit.IFrame.FileDownload in the
trash folder of TB! (I had deleted the message that she had sent me,
which had a copy of the original message that I was alleged to have
sent her). Interestingly, I had set KAV to delete infected files, and
it deleted all the messages in the trash (not a huge problem
obviously, but I usually keep 5000 messages there).

-- 
Regards,
  Mike

Using The Bat! 1.60d
under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Mike Harlos  Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
PGP Keys: DH/DSS- 0x8CD85BCERSA- 0xBBDB40B1
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: A good tool: Win32.Klez worm sent by me via The Bat!?

2002-04-20 Thread Mandara

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, at 18:31:39  +0200 Peter wrote:

PP Win9x http://www.free-av.de/personal/en/win9x/avwin9xp.exe

AntiVir Personal Edition (today's update, newest version)
unfortunately cannot detect even old viruses/trojan/worms, as Weird,
Magistr etc are.


Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
 \/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE8wkeKvgcu6yV9/zYRAvGdAJ4nIN0nyqRVl2VVP+sDB/UZWS31ewCePhUB
bJMg1vAB/1UhpeEwI56O4Ww=
=R6Ml
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: version d

2002-04-20 Thread Lars Geiger

This message bounced back to me, sorry if anyone receives it twice.

Hi Lynna,
On Friday, April 19, 2002 at 12:50:26 [GMT -0800], you wrote:

LL Well I am in Alaska,(USA) on Alaska time, maybe that has something
LL do to with it ; )

That would definitely be an explanation for your time zone, but it
doesn't explain the strange time which my system calculates for your
messages. :-)

BTW, I returned to 1.60d and had TB reindex my folders. Now it shows the
correct local time for your messages. It seems that the time calculation
routines exchanged + and -. So, instead of +10 hours difference (+0200 -
-0800 = +1000) it calculated -6 hours (0200 + -0800 = -0600). That's why
06:23 became 00:23 on my system instead of 16:23.

-- 
Regards,
Lars

The Bat! 1.60d on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
 
|Lars Geiger  |  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]