Re: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled
Hello Scott, On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:19:21 -0600GMT (6-6-02, 5:19 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: SA After troubleshooting more I am confused. On my old machine with SA version 1.60c I can send from those accounts without trouble. On the SA new machine with version 1.60m I can not. Can you send from those accounts with a different client? Try OE, if that works it might be in TB (or your firewall settings concerning TB), if that doesn't work either you know it's something like a faulty configured tcp/ip or firewall. SA I've gone through the settings one by one and they all match. It seems SA the Bat has trouble with one ISP but not the other. Do you use the same connection for both ISP's? And is that the same as your previous pc? -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hi Dierk, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 7:10:34 AM, you wrote: Dierk Hello Jonathan! Dierk On Thursday, June 6, 2002 at 12:19:44 AM you wrote: I personally have no idea... I'll leave that one up to the experts to answer. Dierk Sadly no. It's a long-standing wish to implement a small Flag symbol Dierk to the folder containing such messages. :( TB Developers? -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Discretionary auto-reply
ON Thursday, June 6, 2002, 9:20:08 AM, you wrote: RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of RO the filter) In that way you can forget about dragging it to your RO folder. Hi Roelof, I had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would work. Can you explain the mechanics of this filter including the option check the selected msg against this rule -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= I am Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated. Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Discretionary auto-reply
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:03:31 +0200GMT (6-6-02, 10:03 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of GI had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would Gwork. Can you explain the mechanics of this filter including the Goption check the selected msg against this rule It's quite simple. You create a filter to do whatever you want it to do. Then you check 'Activate the action set of this filter by pressing hotkey:' Now you select the field for the hotkey and press the key combination you want to use and it gets inserted. What you've done now is to create a filter that's executed on the selected message on the hotkey. However, the filter has it's conditions (eg for when you're using it as an automatic filter too). But the filter doesn't check on pressing the hotkey whether the message matches the conditions. When this is unwelcome behavior you can check 'Check the selected message against this rule' and the filter will check the conditions. I don't use this options a lot, but I believe this was how it worked when I tried it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: SpamCop encountered errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, I'm adding in tbudl to this, so we can move the thread to the right group... SA SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SA SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: MDP Okay - next question - Do you have a C:\temp folder on your c drive? MDP If not, that may be the problem... yup it's there and inhabitted by a file, sw_scan.html well, since I recreated the filter, I went into the filter to select the file to export. It had c:\export.txt in there BUT that file never got created. SO I went to the BROWSE button for the filename and it was sitting on C:\...The Bat!\MAIL which seemed weird. SO I pointed it to c:\temp and typed in export.txt . THEN I selected a message and hit CTRL-ALT-S and it created the file export.txt , tried it again and it overwrote it with the new message. Today I will put back the create message for section and try to run it manually against a real spam email ( if I get one;) you really need to STRESS the manual mode for this, I think on automate mode it sent spamcop an email for every email I had in the inbox, NOT GOOD! - -- Best regards, Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60m on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPP9R2j3ZlJQqDEkFEQI+swCguDBki4MsMYQSWTTaIaWfI0UcWisAni0z Quu//0zzxPjjkLp5PjdgwsA+ =59Fl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: SpamCop encountered errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SA SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SA SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: MDP Okay - next question - Do you have a C:\temp folder on your c drive? MDP If not, that may be the problem... yup it's there and inhabitted by a file, sw_scan.html well it seems to have been the export file issue, since I MANUALLY did the CTRL-ALT-S on those TWO emails to test the export file, I got back TWO messages from Spamcop that started with THIS: SpamCop is now ready to process your spam. Use links to finish spam reporting: http://spamcop.net/sc?id=xx I didn't want to do THOSE particular messages, they werent spam! but at least it is working. thanks for the help again! - - -- Paul -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPP9SGz3ZlJQqDEkFEQLdgQCg2xKOPNJZzjMNVWblWelyA/KmVxEAoMON O0gjO2KS2gM83RTGqs48CwgX =56XZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Discretionary auto-reply
ON Thursday, June 6, 2002, 1:15:22 PM, you wrote: RO Hello Gerard, RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of GI had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would Gwork. Can you explain the mechanics of this filter including the Goption C RO It's quite simple. You create a filter to do whatever you want it to RO do. Then you check 'Activate the action set of this filter by pressing RO hotkey:' Now you select the field for the hotkey and press the key RO combination you want to use and it gets inserted. Hi Roelof, I think I understand. What it does is execute whatever actions you have defined in this filter, when you press the Hot-Key combination defined. With the 'Check the selected message against this rule' you have the msg checked against the rule defined and it will only execute the action if it matched the rule. In other words, it executes the filter against one selected msg. I see great possibilities for this option considering the possibilities in the advanced tab :-) Roelof thanks! -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= If he was any dumber, we'd have to water him. Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Customising toolbar
Can you customise the toolbar? Ideally, I would like to right mouse click on a message and have a Quick Template choice, instead of having to click the Reply icon and navigate to the list of templates. However, since this is not a feature (hopefully a future one) is there anyway I can use an icon on the toolbar to click? I have lots of templates so I can't remember their names and use CTRL+Spacebar. -- Best regards, Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Customising toolbar
Thursday, June 6, 2002, 4:46:26 PM, you wrote: JL Can you customise the toolbar? No - but it's a feature that I ( quite a few others, I think) would like to see, there has been talk on this list previously of this being introduced in vers 2. You can, however, customize the function keys, I find this the easiest way to perform many tasks where I'd ideally use a toolbar button, such as labelling a message with a colour group. Deborah Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hello Ben, Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 7:30:57 PM, you wrote: BK Is there a way to show folders that have flagged messages BK automatically? BK Perhaps you could make the folders in the tree that have flagged BK messages in appear red? Various of my folders have a little red checkmark on them. I wonder what it is. -- Best regards, Adammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hello Adam, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 09:54:50 AM (-0700), you wrote: Various of my folders have a little red checkmark on them. I wonder what it is. Those little red check marks indicate unread messages in the Parent Folder. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)
I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so since there's an option to enable or disable the program, why have an additional option for execute. -- JN On Thursday, June 06, 2002, Thomas F wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Allie, On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 13:12:24 -0500 GMT (06/06/02, 01:12 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: ACM I don't know why they would have an option to scan on execute. shrug Normal folks would always want to scan on execute, developers might not want this, in special cases. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: First 2 lines of message does not display
On Thursday, June 06, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... I installed it. Still can't see the first paragraph -- unless I turn on the RCF-822 headers. I find that if I mime-formard the original message to myself, save the attachment, then import it, I can see the first paragraph. Does anyone have any idea why I am not seeing the first paragraph in the ORIGINAL message with the abbreviated headers? i.e. why the first paragraph is displayed ONLY when the full header (RCF-822 headers) is on? Is it on all messages, or just a single message from a certain person? If it is multiple messages, do they come from the same user/isp/client? To me, it sounds like there is a break missing somewhere (ie, the last line of the headers), or there is a break somewhere in the link between the sender, and you that made the line break vanish. It'll appear when you put the full headers on, because TB is assuming it's part of the header. I'm guessing when you forward the email to yourself, TB! is possibly reformatting the headers to attach (not 100% sure on how it all works in detail). -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: First 2 lines of message does not display
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 8:52:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find that if I mime-formard the original message to myself, save the attachment, then import it, I can see the first paragraph. Does anyone have any idea why I am not seeing the first paragraph in the ORIGINAL message with the abbreviated headers? i.e. why the first paragraph is displayed ONLY when the full header (RCF-822 headers) is on? I think that the why is the easy part - for some reason, TB thinks that the first paragraph is part of the header, and is not displaying it. TB and other email software identifies the end of the header and the start of the message text by an empty line (a line which only has a new line character on it. Perhaps, as I think that some others have mentioned, there is a space on the blank lines. IIRC, TB will strip surplus spaces when it is reformatting messages, so maybe the message is being reformatted and the spaces stripped at some point in the process of forwarding the message, saving the attachment, and re-importing. Other than that, I don't have a clue. Do you have MS Word or a similar program installed? Display the message with the RCF-822 headers displayed, and then copy all of the text and paste it to a blank document in Word. If Word does not show non-printing characters (tabs, spaces, etc) by default enable this by going to Tools|Options|View and in the Formatting Marks section, select [ALL]. Then check the message, and see if there is anything other than just a paragraph mark on the lines between the Subject: line in the headers, and the first paragraph. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.60p on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hi Robert, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 8:06:10 PM, you wrote: Robert I think the following would be an appropriate way to handle this Robert A Folders/Tree with unread messages in BOLD Robert B Folders/Tree with parked or Flagged messages with special folder icon Robert C Folders/Tree with items in Color Group in the appropriate color. When more Robert than one color present use the first color Excellent! Any word for TB developers on having this sort of thing for the next release? -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph N. [JN] wrote: ... JN I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that JN scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so JN since there's an option to enable or disable the program, why have JN an additional option for execute. My sentiments exactly. :-) - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60p | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8/9ZdV8nrYCsHF+IRAkAdAKDuYhZnIOdwd1iNlMRHqO6QeU81LwCgp7Ou 1MZK7qLt2ot2XBS5efHOp4o= =eaZJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Watch tread
There is a very useful feature missing from BAT: A way to mark a message so that it would automatically flag any new follow up messages in that tread, like a WATCH for. Sometimes a message is interesting and would like to see the follow-ups, replies, suggestions, but with so many E-mails it is easy to overlook unless it is highlighted somehow. -- Best regards, Peter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60k on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happened today. by Laurence J. Peter Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Problems with TB default mail prog
Has anyone else had to fight with TB and OE over which is the default? Seems TB tries to unset OE from being the default every time it runs even though I have all of those options unchecked in TB. Tom TB v1.60h Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Problems with TB default mail prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 7 June 2002 at 1:51 p.m. Blarp wrote: B Has anyone else had to fight with TB and OE over which is the B default? Seems TB tries to unset OE from being the default every B time it runs even though I have all of those options unchecked in B TB. I am sorry, can't help with your question BUT, why would you even want to use OE if you have TB!? :-) regards Carren PGP public key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Key_Body=Please20send20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.30 Comment: As long as one keeps searching the answers come Comment: ... but sometimes they are a long time coming! :-) iEYEARECAAYFAj0AE3YACgkQyogQhPvf03NeOgCbB2VS27p1PGb+0sUu4HTY71PR r1AAoLVmU+bMVCgWVd09Ox2X4klVlnfG =Mp2G -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Watch tread
Although TB! doesn't exactly have that watch feature, it does have features which do the same thing, only slightly differently. First, you could view your messages by thread, so that messages with the same subject or reference or sender, or whatever you choose, are grouped together. Then, regardless of whether you choose to view by thread, you can create filters so that messages with the same information of your choosing, e.g., subject line, are given the same color group (thereby showing immediately different by color) or moved to a separate folder (thereby showing by the indicators in the folder tree that there are new messages). JN On Thursday, June 06, 2002, Peter Kerekes wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a very useful feature missing from BAT: A way to mark a message so that it would automatically flag any new follow up messages in that tread, like a WATCH for. Sometimes a message is interesting and would like to see the follow-ups, replies, suggestions, but with so many E-mails it is easy to overlook unless it is highlighted somehow. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Problems with TB default mail prog
When I was very unsure of myself and TB, I did simultaneously download into OE (which had the right to remove from server) and TB (mail left on server). I did it for several months, not giving up OE until I was very very comfortable. However, I had no problems keeping them separated, did not allow TB default privileges until I made the leap. Elaine Hello Carren On Thursday, June 6, 2002, you wrote B Has anyone else had to fight with TB and OE over which is the B default? Seems TB tries to unset OE from being the default every B time it runs even though I have all of those options unchecked in B TB. I am sorry, can't help with your question BUT, why would you even want to use OE if you have TB!? :-) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled
Hi; I tried sending with Outlook Express and yes.. I can send using the same account information from Outlook. I went back to The Bat to see if it would now work because you never know with ISPs. Unfortunately I get the same error from The Bat...4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled The old machine and the new machine are both using DSL for the network, in fact I just switch the cable when I want to use the old computer. ( I'm getting all my stuff off ) Kind of strange. Outlook has no problem sending from the account, and The Bat does. The Bat does not have a problem sending from my other ISP however, so for now I've switched to using their SMTP. -- - Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, June 6, 2002, 1:26:25 AM, you wrote: RO Hello Scott, RO On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:19:21 -0600GMT (6-6-02, 5:19 +0200GMT, where I RO live), you wrote: SA After troubleshooting more I am confused. On my old machine with SA version 1.60c I can send from those accounts without trouble. On the SA new machine with version 1.60m I can not. RO Can you send from those accounts with a different client? Try OE, if RO that works it might be in TB (or your firewall settings concerning RO TB), if that doesn't work either you know it's something like a faulty RO configured tcp/ip or firewall. SA I've gone through the settings one by one and they all match. It seems SA the Bat has trouble with one ISP but not the other. RO Do you use the same connection for both ISP's? And is that the same as RO your previous pc? This mail is brought to you by: Hidden Villas Rental Homes http://www.hiddenvillas.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hello Robert, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 21:06:10 +0200 GMT (07/06/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT), Robert van der Hulst wrote: RvdH I think the following would be an appropriate way to handle this RvdH A Folders/Tree with unread messages in BOLD RvdH B Folders/Tree with parked or Flagged messages with special folder icon RvdH C Folders/Tree with items in Color Group in the appropriate color. When more RvdH than one color present use the first color RvdH All three of these can be combined: RvdH - Bold/Red would mean unread and RED present RvdH - Green/Special Icon: Green and parked I don't want to turn TB into a colourful circus. I just want a little additional flag, the size of these little arrows on the Inbox and Outbox, showing that there are flagged messages in that folder. RvdH The only problem would be parked and flagged in the same folder. Then The Bat RvdH would have to make a choice. I can live with that g. Not me, I couldn't. If flagged and parked get confused, it has no use for me. Also, I have parked messages in every single folder. Indicating parked messages in the folder tree would defeat the purpose. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Work is the curse of the drinking class. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60p under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)
Hello Allie, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:38:37 -0500 GMT (07/06/02, 04:38 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: JN I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that JN scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so JN since there's an option to enable or disable the program, why have JN an additional option for execute. ACM My sentiments exactly. :-) I just checked and couldn't find the option. However, I would think it is to toggle the realtime scan on/off without unloading the plugin. The way I work with PCC is the same: if I want to shut off the real-time scan, I right click on the systray icon and take the tick off Real-Time. I do not Exit the program. When I need to switch it on again, it doesn't need to load. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Wann wird denn endlich der Niagara-Fall geloest oder die Formel 1 ausgerechnet ?? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60p under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled
Hello Scott, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:24:49 -0600 GMT (07/06/02, 11:24 +0700 GMT), Scott Ames wrote: SA I tried sending with Outlook Express and yes.. I can send using the SA same account information from Outlook. I went back to The Bat to see SA if it would now work because you never know with ISPs. Unfortunately I SA get the same error from The Bat...4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem SA is not enabled Wait a minute. Is that on your LAN? There is a network setting which allows/disallows POP and SMTP. OL/OE also do something else. Ask your sysadmin. Probably he needs to enable the interactive routing subsystem, I would guess. SA Kind of strange. Outlook has no problem sending from the account, and SA The Bat does. The Bat does not have a problem sending from my other SA ISP however, so for now I've switched to using their SMTP. If using an external SMTP server works, you can send your mails. And probably wouldn't know the difference, either. So if your sysadmin won't help (usually they cite security reasons if they don't know how to do something), you're not off the net. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Wrinkled Was Not One of the Things I Wanted to Be When I Grew Up. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60p under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Problems with TB default mail prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 7 June 2002 at 2:26 p.m. ETM wrote: E When I was very unsure of myself and TB, I did simultaneously E download into OE (which had the right to remove from server) and TB E (mail left on server). I did it for several months, not giving up E OE until I was very very comfortable. However, I had no problems E keeping them separated, did not allow TB default privileges until I E made the leap. :-) Point taken Elaine. I can see how that might be a good idea for someone making the transition. I guess I was remembering my own experience as a new TB! user - after only a day or two of trialing TB! I dumped Outlook completely and never looked at it again. Mind you, I *did* have some excellent personal TB! tuition from a certain special friend, so I guess that made a significant difference to adjusting to the TB! learning curve :-) Without that, yes, I can see that perhaps a transition period of using both email systems might be helpful. regards Carren PGP public key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Key_Body=Please20send20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.30 Comment: As long as one keeps searching the answers come Comment: ... but sometimes they are a long time coming! :-) iEYEARECAAYFAj0ANzkACgkQyogQhPvf03M7YQCfd6lVRT5MMCsU4jKrz3QbT13S 8Y0AoJTDLYBiLWzho9dVSWeopkqTeySb =nN9C -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled
Hi; It's not a LAN, it's just a DSL dialup from home. Outlook Express can send from the same machine to that SMTP, but the Bat 1.60m can not. The older version of The Bat can on the other machine. ( haven't tried the older version on the new machine or the other way around ) Simply a mystery. There is something it doesn't like. -- - Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:33:34 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Scott, TF On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:24:49 -0600 GMT (07/06/02, 11:24 +0700 GMT), TF Scott Ames wrote: SA I tried sending with Outlook Express and yes.. I can send using the SA same account information from Outlook. I went back to The Bat to see SA if it would now work because you never know with ISPs. Unfortunately I SA get the same error from The Bat...4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem SA is not enabled TF Wait a minute. Is that on your LAN? There is a network setting which TF allows/disallows POP and SMTP. OL/OE also do something else. Ask your TF sysadmin. Probably he needs to enable the interactive routing TF subsystem, I would guess. SA Kind of strange. Outlook has no problem sending from the account, and SA The Bat does. The Bat does not have a problem sending from my other SA ISP however, so for now I've switched to using their SMTP. TF If using an external SMTP server works, you can send your mails. And TF probably wouldn't know the difference, either. So if your sysadmin TF won't help (usually they cite security reasons if they don't know TF how to do something), you're not off the net. This mail is brought to you by: Hidden Villas Rental Homes http://www.hiddenvillas.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Problems with TB default mail prog
Hi Carren, CS I am sorry, can't help with your question BUT, why would you even want CS to use OE if you have TB!? :-) OE plays with Lotus Organizer better (aka MAPI). There are a couple of other very minor reasons I still use it. Tom Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
DSL and the Bat!
I hope no one will think this is a stupid question but, we recently installed DSL and I can't seem to figure out how to connect to my email using The Bat. I keep getting a window that says that no dial-up connection was made. Call me brainless but does this software work on a DSL connection and if so, how do I get it to work? Thanks, Lynn Kucera I hate using Outlook
