Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail
Hello Miguel, On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:46:18 +0100 GMT (01/03/03, 21:46 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: No, the fact that I never thought about modigying the subject of an incoming message, and that I don't understand the need to do so, doesn't mean I'm against the feature. I may think that there are higher priority features to include in TB though. I would think this has a higher priority than a scheuduler or an HTML-editor, especially since writing the code for it can be done quickly. But that's only my opinion. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Finally 21, and Legally Able to Do Everything I've Been Doing Since 15. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Attachments Separately or in Message Base?
Hello Doug, On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:21:45 -0800 GMT (02/03/03, 09:21 +0700 GMT), Doug Gannon wrote: I guess my real concern was that The Bat might slow down when having to access a large message base. I imagined clicking on a folder on the left of the window only to have to wait for several seconds for The Bat to read the contents in order to display the list of messages on the right. But then, maybe I'm not understanding how things work in The Bat. Do you think that a message base that has gotten large from attachments, etc. would slow down The Bat? I keep attachments in the message base. My biggest folder has a message base that is currently around 59 MB big (is that big?). There is no noticeable slow-down when I open the folder. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I intend to live forever - so far, so good. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: plugin for the bat!: vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 12:13 AM, you wrote: TC in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm you can find a TC anti-spam plug'in for the bat! (1.63 beta 3 or earlier) very nice, but what is it and what does it do? The web page said to download it, but there was no info on the product, and the authors web page was in Spanish ( Chilean?). Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: plugin for the bat!: vampire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @2-Mar-2003, 07:46 -0500 (12:46 UK time) Paul Cartwright said: TC in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm you can find a TC anti-spam plug'in for the bat! (1.63 beta 3 or earlier) very nice, but what is it and what does it do? The web page said to download it, but there was no info on the product, and the authors web page was in Spanish ( Chilean?). Announcement here is a little premature. This is a plug-in for the new TB Anti-SPAM plug in in the 1.63 beta series. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+Yf/xOeQkq5KdzaARAiPmAJ9cADiC7IGNfMuJL9bRBx7dfB0QVQCg39/O VyI9oItpgL1R2RF3MA0TXQE= =0HP+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que Marck en su momento posteó: TC in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm you can find a TC anti-spam plug'in for the bat! (1.63 beta 3 or earlier) very nice, but what is it and what does it do? The web page said to download it, but there was no info on the product, and the authors web page was in Spanish ( Chilean?). MDP Announcement here is a little premature. This is a plug-in for the MDP new TB Anti-SPAM plug in in the 1.63 beta series. ¿Ups, i'm sorry? ¿did you know some list to discuss about beta versions? -- Se despide, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net correo: TaskControl arroba SoftHome punto net Usando: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 - Trillian PRO 1.0 B Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que Paul en su momento posteó: PC very nice, but what is it It is a plug'in for the new The Bat 1.63+ Series, and this the bat versions are in beta testing now. (currently Beta7) PC and what does it do? Scan yours mail message and if it find any spam, it kill it. The User need configure and define the rules to know when some mail is spam. Some mail can be suspect to spam, the user define it's again. And this mails will be puted in a junk mail folder (you can rescue it). PC The web page said to download it, but there was no info on the PC product, When you was installed it, you can see a readme file. PC and the authors web page was in Spanish ( Chilean?). Yeah, Chilean, The southest country in america (pacific ocean side) -- Se despide, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net correo: TaskControl arroba SoftHome punto net Usando: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 - Trillian PRO 1.0 B Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Hello Task, Sunday, March 2, 2003, 2:32:32 PM, you wrote: TC ¿did you know some list to discuss about beta versions? Yes. You can subscribe to tbbeta by sending an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Hello Task, On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:32:32 -0400 GMT (02/03/03, 21:32 +0700 GMT), Task Control wrote: MDP Announcement here is a little premature. This is a plug-in for the MDP new TB Anti-SPAM plug in in the 1.63 beta series. ¿Ups, i'm sorry? ¿did you know some list to discuss about beta versions? Send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put the word subscribe in the subject. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic route. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: plugin for the bat!: vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 7:58 AM, you wrote: TC in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm you can find a TC anti-spam plug'in for the bat! (1.63 beta 3 or earlier) MDP Announcement here is a little premature. This is a plug-in for the MDP new TB Anti-SPAM plug in in the 1.63 beta series. then this should be going on in TBBETA :) -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
You might find this interesting - your email is thought to be spam according to a good spam filter. :-) I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. ztrader On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 6:39:16 AM, Task Control wrote: TC SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- TC SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered TC SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. TC SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. TC SPAM: TC SPAM: Content analysis details: (7.60 hits, 5 required) TC SPAM: IN_REP_TO (-0.8 points) Found a In-Reply-To header TC SPAM: REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header TC SPAM: USER_AGENT_THEBAT (0.3 points) X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (The Bat!) TC SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) TC SPAM:[score: 0] TC SPAM: SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE (-0.3 points) Long signature present (empty lines) TC SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com TC SPAM:[RBL check: found 49.58.62.200.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.4] TC SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org TC SPAM:[RBL check: found 49.58.62.200.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6] TC SPAM: RCVD_IN_SBL(3.2 points) RBL: Received via SBLed relay, see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ TC SPAM:[RBL check: found 49.58.62.200.sbl.spamhaus.org.] TC SPAM: X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC (2.7 points) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source TC SPAM: AWL(-0.5 points) AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment TC SPAM: TC SPAM: End of SpamAssassin results - TC Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: TC En relación a lo que Paul en su momento posteó: PC very nice, but what is it TC It is a plug'in for the new The Bat 1.63+ Series, and this the bat TC versions are in beta testing now. (currently Beta7) PC and what does it do? TC Scan yours mail message and if it find any spam, it kill it. The User TC need configure and define the rules to know when some mail is spam. TC Some mail can be suspect to spam, the user define it's again. And this TC mails will be puted in a junk mail folder (you can rescue it). PC The web page said to download it, but there was no info on the PC product, TC When you was installed it, you can see a readme file. PC and the authors web page was in Spanish ( Chilean?). TC Yeah, Chilean, The southest country in america (pacific ocean side) Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 12:36 PM, you wrote: z You might find this interesting - your email is thought to be spam z according to a good spam filter. :-) I've included the filter analysis z part so you can see why. SPAM: X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC (2.7 points) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source so, I am a confirmed spam source:) cool! I'm not sure I understand exactly why my email got caught, sorry, it still doesn't make much sense. -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Hello ztrader, You might find this interesting - your email is thought to be spam according to a good spam filter. :-) I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. Well, then the filter perhaps is not that good :-) It wasn't flagged as spam by my POPFile which is running on 99.43% accuracy. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Hello Paul, so, I am a confirmed spam source:) cool! I'm not sure I understand exactly why my email got caught, sorry, it still doesn't make much sense. No, you are not a spammer. It wasn't your message Paul, it was the one sent by Task Control :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Attachments Separately or in Message Base?
Doug- And one more comment, since this hasn't been covered yet: If you store your attachments in a separate folder, as I do, then what gets stored with the message is a pointer to the attachment in the external folder. If you move the message to another account or folder the pointer doesn't change, so there's no problem there. I find that keeping my attachments separate does indeed make things faster, maybe because I'm accessing my email storage over a network rather than on my own machine. It's also better for my peace of mind - I've had a couple of corrupted message databases that I can directly link to embedded binary attachments. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que ztrader en su momento posteó: z I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. I analzie this but o do not understand why. z SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) z SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via z SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a z relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org z SPAM: RCVD_IN_SBL(3.2 points) RBL: Received via z SBLed relay, see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ The route that follow the mail? can i change this? i think not. -- Se despide, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net correo: TaskControl arroba SoftHome punto net Usando: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 - Trillian PRO 1.0 B Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Attachments Separately or in Message Base?
Hello Mark, Thanks for the information about pointers to attachments. That makes sense to me. I'm going to try one account with attachments stored in the message base and another with the same attachments in a separate directory to see if there's a noticeable difference. If you store your attachments in a separate folder, as I do, then what gets stored with the message is a pointer to the attachment in the external folder. If you move the message to another account or folder the pointer doesn't change, so there's no problem there. This did work for me. When I moved a message with an attachment to another account, I could open the attachment even though the file was still located in the original account's directory. However, when I then deleted the message that I had moved, and emptied the trash folder, the attachment did not get deleted from it's original location. And yes, both accounts were set up to remove attachments when the message was deleted. This isn't a big problem or anything, but it looks like I'd probably want to keep messages in their original accounts if I decide to store attachments in a separate directory. I guess I'm just too lazy to want to have to delete attachments manually. grin I find that keeping my attachments separate does indeed make things faster, maybe because I'm accessing my email storage over a network rather than on my own machine. It's also better for my peace of mind - I've had a couple of corrupted message databases that I can directly link to embedded binary attachments. You make an interesting point about corrupted message bases. I wonder how often that happens and how often it can be repaired. I'll just have to try it both ways and see which one feels more comfortable for me. Thanks again for the comments. Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!: vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 11:14:57 AM, Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU Hello ztrader, You might find this interesting - your email is thought to be spam according to a good spam filter. :-) I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. MAU Well, then the filter perhaps is not that good :-) It wasn't flagged as MAU spam by my POPFile which is running on 99.43% accuracy. I get 500-600 emails a day, and it typically misplaces only one email every 1-3 days - not bad, I'd say. Also, I have it set 'tight' so it is more likely to have a false positive (as this was) than to pollute an otherwise good folder. I just sent it along to let the writer know the items that were causing it to get flagged. There was a bit of humor because the writer was talking about an anti-spam program. ztrader Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 1:22:55 PM, Task Control wrote: TC Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: TC En relación a lo que ztrader en su momento posteó: z I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. TC I analzie this but o do not understand why. z SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) z SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via z SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a z relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org z SPAM: RCVD_IN_SBL(3.2 points) RBL: Received via z SBLed relay, see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ TC The route that follow the mail? can i change this? i think not. It seems as though most of the 'score' is from your routing. Without the routing, your email would be a rather low score and would get through easily. You might ask your ISP why they are using a confirmed spammer route, and forward the above headers to them to help them check it out. ztrader Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, @2-Mar-2003, 14:38 -0800 (22:38 UK time) ztrader [Z] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: TC The route that follow the mail? can i change this? i think not. Z It seems as though most of the 'score' is from your routing. Without Z the routing, your email would be a rather low score and would get Z through easily. You might ask your ISP why they are using a confirmed Z spammer route, and forward the above headers to them to help them Z check it out. FYI - Osiris also BLs Dial-up users like me so this message will get a positive score from them too. It's a *bad* test! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+You7OeQkq5KdzaARAhMdAKCE3rmIysvRguik/6joqjFLTSGJJwCguRie JzksA9YiRc2UPqv8j0v1fLI= =m7wA -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Stupid problem with quoted names
* Miguel A. Urech writes: Hello Marck, There's your problem. Do this instead. Hello %OFROMFNAME,%- %TO=''%TO='%OFROMNAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]'%- %REPLYTO=''%REPLYTO='Some Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]' The %OFROMNAME macro excludes the double quotes (and should). I've tried that, but then every Name in the To field will appear in between quotes. I know that is no problem, but I thought I could avoid it. Maybe this one helps you. Its actual purpose is to add list names to the To-address when replying. The first %IF checks for the existence of characters in From-name that make quoting neccessary. , | %IF:%- | %SETPATTREGEXP='[\.\@,;;\\\(\)\[\]]'%REGEXPMATCH='%OFromName'=%- | :#%- | %TO=''%- | %TO=_%CAPITAL='%OFROMNAME' on %- | %ABoreplyHANDLE='%ABoreplyNAME'%- | %OREPLYADDR_#%- | :#%- | %TO=''%- | %TO=_%CAPITAL='%OFROMNAME' on %- | %ABoreplyHANDLE='%ABoreplyNAME'%- | %OREPLYADDR_%- | #%- ` (listname is stored in handle field of the address book) -- HTH + best regards, Carsten Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 2:54:50 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP FYI - Osiris also BLs Dial-up users like me Why do they do that? MDP so this message will MDP get a positive score from them too. It's a *bad* test! The score for your message was only 0.7, with 5.0 as the trigger - reasonably low. It would seem as though there were enough other factors to compensate for the Osiris factor. Some factors are negative, and subtract from an otherwise high score from routing. There was a rather big discussion about including Osiris, etc in the scoring. Many seemed to be innocent users who had an ISP that was not good about curtailing spam. Most people thought it would, overall, be a good idea to keep it, and so I left the usual BL suspects in. This was in part because I wanted a 'tight' scoring, but it seems to work very well even with these included. ztrader Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, @2-Mar-2003, 16:01 -0800 (00:01 UK time) ztrader [Z] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP FYI - Osiris also BLs Dial-up users like me Z Why do they do that? Because the *nix propeller heads that think they own the Internet don't think that any serious mail server user should hide behind a dial-up connection. One such runs monkeys.com, a major open relay blacklist, and goes by the name of Ron Guilmette. I got a major roasting from him because of my dial-up IP and sub-hosted domain status. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+YqDdOeQkq5KdzaARAkcRAKCbxa5F7sa9nuBl7lIy9FicbUxHiQCbBiW4 qPagMIokh1rsbY/8OqyeYU8= =hcEz -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Timeout...or something
Saturday, March 1, 2003, 8:25:02 PM,Michael wrote: MLW I have five email accounts. When I press Alt-F2, The Bat MLW starts to check them. It always gets the first three or four, but MLW cannot MLW get the last one. The strange thing is that it always checks them MLW in a different order, so the last one or two that are left with an MLW error are different. It seems that the bat does not have enough time MLW to check all five. Any ideas? Are they all with the same ISP/mail provider? If so it may be that you're only being allowed so many connections to the pop server at one time. I have this on my domain's mail server - it will only allow three connections at the same time, so I have to check the 7 accounts on it in batches of three. -- Cheers, Anne Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 98 4.10 Build Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: plugin for the bat!: vampire
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que Task en su momento posteó: in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm betas page you can find the last beta version of vampire, News: - new filters language, now you can mix the parts of the mail. See help in configurator. - size of mail filter (prevent's big mail crash) - external images filter - vampire to vampirex automatic migrate software - software to check and edit your filters TC in http://fyberger.tripod.com/vampire/vampire.htm you can find a TC anti-spam plug'in for the bat! (1.63 beta 3 or earlier) TC Enjoy it! TC Warning: Body and Attachment filters support are not ready in The TC Bat! yet (1.63Beta7) -- Se despide, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net correo: TaskControl arroba SoftHome punto net Usando: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 - Trillian PRO 1.0 B Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
better searching msgs
I went to Mozilla mail for some time and really liked--no, LOVED--the ability to type a string at the top of a message list and instantly have the msg list filtered to only msgs that contained that string in the subject or sender... The Quick Search has always been frustrating b/c there's no find next... Would love a search feature similar to that of Mozilla mail. Thanks. Best regards, Aaron Aaron Green, MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] From a marketing perspective, you don't introduce new products in August. --White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, explaining the administration's decision to wait until after labor day to push for war with Iraq Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: better searching msgs
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com: En relación a lo que Aaron en su momento posteó: AG The Quick Search has always been frustrating b/c there's no find AG next... The quick search has a find next open the quick search, write your saearch, when you find anything, only press [CTRL]+[ENTER] and the quick search will go to the next. -- Se despide, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net correo: TaskControl arroba SoftHome punto net Usando: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 - Trillian PRO 1.0 B Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Attachments Separately or in Message Base?
Doug- Sunday, March 2, 2003, 2:16:40 PM, you wrote: DG file was still located in the original account's directory. However, DG when I then deleted the message that I had moved, and emptied the DG trash folder, the attachment did not get deleted from it's original DG location. And yes, both accounts were set up to remove attachments DG when the message was deleted. I have to admit I haven't checked to see if this has happened to me, but I wouldn't bet against it. TB *should* just be able to use the pointer, so on the surface it doesn't seem to make sense that the attachment wouldn't get deleted, but it should be filed as a bug if you can verify it happening. One caveat that I should point out: if you have an account that is keeping attachments inline and you then switch it to storing them externally, it only takes effect from that point on. In other words, any previously received messages with attachments still have them inline. This hasn't caused any problems as far as I can tell, but it's annoying not to be able to move the existing ones out of the database. DG You make an interesting point about corrupted message bases. I wonder DG how often that happens and how often it can be repaired. I'll just DG have to try it both ways and see which one feels more comfortable for DG me. It's pretty rare, but I had to do some serious surgery to correct it when it happened. I only have one that I haven't been able to repair so far - one message has a bad CRC that stays bad no matter how many times I fix it. I'm still working on that one. It's a minor problem since the rest of that database works fine. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
Marck- ROTFL. Methinks ignorance and arrogance are two major prerequisites for attaining ISPdom. I think this subject line is getting a little out of hand, too... -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: better searching msgs
Task, TC The quick search has a find next open the quick search, write TC your saearch, when you find anything, only press [CTRL]+[ENTER] Oh :) But it's still nice instantly to see all 50 msgs that might contain that text b/c then you can find immediately exactly what it is you wanted to find! Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: LIKELY SPAM: Re[2]: plugin for the bat!:vampire
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 4:24:59 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Because the *nix propeller heads that think they own the Internet MDP don't think that any serious mail server user should hide behind MDP a dial-up connection. I can believe that. An unfortunately large number of *nix people are not known for having open minds. :- ztrader Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: LIKELY SPAM: (was: plugin for the bat!: vampire)
Hello Task, On Sunday, March 2, 2003 at 10:22:55 PM you [TC]wrote (at least in part): z SPAM: RCVD_IN_SBL(3.2 points) RBL: Received via z SBLed relay, see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ TC The route that follow the mail? can i change this? i think not. No. But you can point your ISP to http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL6652 and http://spews.org/html/S331.html and he taking the appropriate actions to be delisted at there. Osirusoft is in fact a argumentative database, but the IP listed there contained in your mails is not in the database for being a dial-up IP, but a spammer hosting one like Spamhaus states too. So in this case you're the innocent victim of your ISPs actions. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Bother said Pooh, as he destroyed New Hampshire. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
