On Sunday, March 2, 2003, 1:22:55 PM, Task Control wrote: TC> Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com:
TC> En relación a lo que ztrader en su momento posteó: z>> I've included the filter analysis part so you can see why. TC> I analzie this but o do not understand why. z>> SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) z>> SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via z>> SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a z>> relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org z>> SPAM: RCVD_IN_SBL (3.2 points) RBL: Received via z>> SBLed relay, see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ TC> The route that follow the mail? can i change this? i think not. It seems as though most of the 'score' is from your routing. Without the routing, your email would be a rather low score and would get through easily. You might ask your ISP why they are using a confirmed spammer route, and forward the above headers to them to help them check it out. ztrader ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
