Re: Table formatting
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 7:50:39 AM, Allister Jenks wrote: > My point was that Office is a less than ideal choice. But then if it > works for you, I see no reason you shouldn't use it. Just be aware that > Office is as much an HTML editor by design as TB!. This reminds me of the following, which was posted by Thomas on TBOT back in the mists of time: On Friday, August 2, 2002, 7:46:43 PM, Thomas F. wrote: > FAQ on the web page developers' site: > Q: How do I protect my work so that people cannot copy the code? > A: You can't. But if you use FrontPage, nobody will *want* to copy it. Insert your favourite Office application in place of FrontPage. :-) Julian -- Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
On Sunday, July 4, 2004, 10:13 PM, you wrote: KA> Known spammer technique. If the message doesn't get kicked back, they KA> assume they reached a valid address. There are lot of things one can KA> do server-side to preclude this but at the very least, you can filter KA> on empty subject fields and probably the empty to field depending upon KA> how the incoming message is constructed. ok, I'm not a good filter maker, how do you dpecify NULL in a field to filter on, just add the file recipient, leave the strings field empty and say Presence YES? ( or no..) -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Rogue
On Sunday, July 4, 2004, 10:07 PM, you wrote: SC> I notice that you picture is in the rogues gallery, but you don't SC> sign with the :Sig: , so you don't show up on the Header bar? I SC> don't either, but because I don't have a picture yet. Just wondering SC> if this is by design. this is still a beta item, not in the production product, so I haven't changed my sig in tbudl. In TBOT I do :) if you want to discuss smileys, do it in tbot or tbbeta, ok ? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
Hallo Paul, On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 06:43:36 -0400GMT (5-7-2004, 12:43 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PC> ok, I'm not a good filter maker, how do you dpecify NULL in a field to PC> filter on, just add the file recipient, leave the strings field empty PC> and say Presence YES? ( or no..) Try something like this \nTo:\s*\n being present in kludges with regexp enabled on the Options tab \n is for a new line To: stands for the To: header \s stands for space * means that the previous character (in this case the space) must be present zero, one or multiple times. You start looking for (newline)To:, because you don't want the filter to be triggered by something like an empty In-Reply-To: header. You include the possibility of any number of spaces, because those don't make any substance in the field You end with a final new line, because if you don't any To: header would do, because they're all something like To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apart from checking for an empty To: header you could also try whether there's a valid address in the To: header, you don't need any regexp for that, just check for @ in recipient. That doesn't make it necessary for a valid address in the To: header, but it makes likely. You could also specifically look for a @ in the To: header, by searching the kludges for something like this: \nTo:.*@ again with regexp enabled the dot matches any character apart from a new line, so what your loking for is a To: header followed by any sequence of characters followed by a '@'. Note that you wanted to search for an empty To: header, so the first filter condition should be present, while the other two should not be present. -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Table formatting
Hi Julian Beach (Lists) - On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, at 08:50:53 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:50 AM where I live) you wrote: >> FAQ on the web page developers' site: >> Q: How do I protect my work so that people cannot copy the code? >> A: You can't. But if you use FrontPage, nobody will *want* to copy it. > Insert your favourite Office application in place of FrontPage. :-) > Julian See, there you go. MS Office is safe to use... ;-) -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpieggmh4Kws.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 7:32 AM, you wrote: RO> Note that you wanted to search for an empty To: header, so the first RO> filter condition should be present, while the other two should not be RO> present. thanks, I understand the regex and filters part, NOW, what happens if I am on a long list and someone ( friend) BCCs something... the TO: will be blank and this filter will catch it? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
Hallo Paul, On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 10:36:26 -0400GMT (5-7-2004, 16:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PC> thanks, I understand the regex and filters part, NOW, what happens if I PC> am on a long list and someone ( friend) BCCs something... the TO: will PC> be blank and this filter will catch it? The first filter is supposed to catch that. Didn't test it, you might call that arrogance, but I presume my simple filters to work. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 10:52 AM, you wrote: PC>> thanks, I understand the regex and filters part, NOW, what happens if I PC>> am on a long list and someone ( friend) BCCs something... the TO: will PC>> be blank and this filter will catch it? RO> The first filter is supposed to catch that. RO> Didn't test it, you might call that arrogance, but I presume my simple RO> filters to work. ;- oh, I'm sure they do work, but they may also do more than you thought they would :) I just like to think up 'what if" scenarios.. for testing purposes:) -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
Hallo Paul, On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 10:59:08 -0400GMT (5-7-2004, 16:59 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PC> oh, I'm sure they do work, but they may also do more than you thought PC> they would :) I just like to think up 'what if" scenarios.. for testing PC> purposes:) In that case.. You asked for a filter to catch empty To: headers, that was what you got. Now you're coming with additional wishes, that'll cost you extra. When you've got friends that are so consciencly that they include all recipients in the BCC, then the odds are that you've got them in your AB already. Soi the only enhancement to my proposed filter would be to to check whether the sender is in your AB. Maybe except for the AB group dedicated to unwanted persons. (Something like 'Dumb twits from tbudl' ) -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 11:15 AM, you wrote: RO> In that case.. RO> You asked for a filter to catch empty To: headers, that was what you RO> got. Now you're coming with additional wishes, that'll cost you extra. acutally, if I put it AFTER my known filter, that would probably work too:) RO> When you've got friends that are so consciencly that they include all RO> recipients in the BCC, then the odds are that you've got them in your RO> AB already. true ! as long as the known filter is first & continues filtering RO> Soi the only enhancement to my proposed filter would be to to check RO> whether the sender is in your AB. Maybe except for the AB group RO> dedicated to unwanted persons. (Something like 'Dumb twits from tbudl' RO> ) that would be the "plonk" filter :) -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
Hallo rich,
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:30:18 -0400GMT (5-7-2004, 17:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RG> It sounds like there's a way then to filter for a string of, say, 12
RG> consecutive spaces in the subject line.
RG> Subject: Macromedia coursesjw355q
RG> Is obviously spam and the string of spaces gives it away.
12 spaces? Would be something \s{12}
But it might be that that won't match when there's 13 spaces, not sure
about that. You could also check for between 3 and 50 spaces, that
would be \s{3,50}
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies
or rabbits.
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
I have been evaluating TB for two weeks, and have found a show-stopper that will prevent my using it. I am using TB 2.11.02 on Windows XP Home. I use ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 as a firewall, use a LinkSys wireless router for the home network, and connect to comcast.net through a cable modem. TB checks for email every five minutes. Every so often, as in 3-4 times per day, the Connection Centre shows all bytes of all emails received, 1 second estimated time left, and just stops. The log shows all emails received, but TB never closes the connection. I can close Connection Centre, delete the task, abort all tasks, but next time the Connection Centre opens, the same receive task shows with the same stats and time remaining. Apparently, TB is unable to stop the hung task. If I could just kill it, the problem would not be so severe, but when I try to exit TB, I get a popup telling me tasks are still active, and do I want to exit when they finish. Whether I click YES, NO or ABORT, the popup goes away, and TB does not exit. I cannot start new processes, like the Task Manager. If task manager is already open, and I try to End Task on TB, the task manager hangs. If I try to LogOff or shut down Windows, I get the same popup as if I tried to exit TB. The only solution I have found is the reset button. I cannot afford to do that to my system 3-4 times per day. Does anyone have a solution for this? Or do I need to try again to find a replacement for Outlook Express? -- Jim McMaster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpZhi7KVoXkt.pgp Description: PGP signature smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 12:41 PM, you wrote: JM> I have been evaluating TB for two weeks, and have found a JM> show-stopper that will prevent my using it. I am using TB 2.11.02 JM> on Windows XP Home. I use ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 as a firewall, JM> use a LinkSys wireless router for the home network, and connect to JM> comcast.net through a cable modem. hi Jim, we have a similar setup, except my Linksys router is not wireless. I do use XP Home, I do have Comcast cablemodem, and a router, and I do use Avast, AVG and ( your personal preference for firewall goes here). I won't beat a dead horse except to say to look in the TBUDL archives ( check the HELP menu- see FAQ) for Zone alarm and TB. Zone alarm is known to cause major issues with TB. Period. I have used Kerio, tpf ( tiny personal firewall) and I now use Mcafee. dump Zonealarm, try another firewall and then TB will be very happy. JM> Does anyone have a solution for this? Or do I need to try JM> again to find a replacement for Outlook Express? oh, and I set my mail for 8 minutes. I think anything under 10 minutes will keep you logged in, where it won't have to send username & password back to the POP3 server.. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
Hello Jim, Monday, July 5, 2004, 18:04, you wrote: JM>> I have been evaluating TB for two weeks, and have found a JM>> show-stopper that will prevent my using it. I am using TB 2.11.02 JM>> on Windows XP Home. I use ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 as a firewall, JM>> use a LinkSys wireless router for the home network, and connect to JM>> comcast.net through a cable modem. PC> I won't beat a dead horse except to say to look in the TBUDL PC> archives ( check the HELP menu- see FAQ) for Zone alarm and TB. PC> Zone alarm is known to cause major issues with TB. Period. I've been a ZA user for a long time and have been quite skeptical of some of the "dump ZA" solutions to various problems, but... ...I recently had similar issues (power-off-reset) with POPFile that I eventually traced solidly to ZA Pro 5.x. For a full-price product I think that they are bit "relaxed" when it comes to looking after non mass-market products like TB! and POPFile. For what it's worth, I'm happily trialling Outpost at the moment although I do miss a few of ZA Pro's features. -- Nick Using TheBat!: v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
Hello Nick & Jim Monday, July 5, 2004, 7:29:02 PM, you wrote: ND> Hello Jim, ND> Monday, July 5, 2004, 18:04, you wrote: JM>>> I have been evaluating TB for two weeks, and have found a JM>>> show-stopper that will prevent my using it. I am using TB 2.11.02 JM>>> on Windows XP Home. I use ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 as a firewall, JM>>> use a LinkSys wireless router for the home network, and connect to JM>>> comcast.net through a cable modem. PC>> I won't beat a dead horse except to say to look in the TBUDL PC>> archives ( check the HELP menu- see FAQ) for Zone alarm and TB. PC>> Zone alarm is known to cause major issues with TB. Period. TB with AVG7 plugin, Outpost, Spyblocker here on various comps. Notebooks and desktops, all with XP pros. Asus wireless router, ADSL modem. The TB should be in the trusted apps list in Outpost. NO problems here... -- Best regards, Denevermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
Jim > If I could just kill it, the problem would not be so severe, but when I > try to exit TB, I get a popup telling me tasks are still active, and do > I want to exit when they finish. Whether I click YES, NO or ABORT, the > popup goes away, and TB does not exit. I cannot start new processes, > like the Task Manager. If task manager is already open, and I try to > End Task on TB, the task manager hangs. If I try to LogOff or shut down > Windows, I get the same popup as if I tried to exit TB. > > The only solution I have found is the reset button. I cannot afford to > do that to my system 3-4 times per day. I'm getting exactly the same symptoms here. > Or do I need to try again to find a replacement... As much as it hurts to say this, I'm doing just that. I've been using TB! for about four years and am getting disillusioned with the way development is going. I don't need the more esoteric features of TB! but I *do* need stability. There is always that nagging doubt about whether my message base will be there when 'switch on'. -- Best regards William Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
Hello William, Monday, July 5, 2004, 19:07, you wrote: >> The only solution I have found is the reset button. I cannot afford to >> do that to my system 3-4 times per day. TJ> I'm getting exactly the same symptoms here. >> Or do I need to try again to find a replacement... TJ> As much as it hurts to say this, I'm doing just that. I've TJ> been using TB! for about four years and am getting disillusioned TJ> with the way development is going. I don't need the more esoteric TJ> features of TB! but I *do* need stability. I know what you mean, but having had to be away from TB! for weeks at a time in the past year instability seems to be the way of the world - but also coupled with an abject lack of features and no soul (sorry getting OT here). Thinking back, perhaps it's just that over the years I've resolved my apps to the most reliable and have forgotten what pain many other windows users go through every day? -- Nick Using TheBat!: v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Can I globally clear an address book field ?
Hello, Is there any way that I can clear a single field in every AB record? I've just started using the Nickname field in macros, only to find that it's been occupied by some horrible ex-OL2K random string like this: ce9838d6-f141-4b77-a280-c5113de96572. I think that it came from some dodgy CRM addin that I tried once before I knew better. Ta, -- Nick Using TheBat!: v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB hanging while receiving messages from POP3 server
Hello Jim, You wrote on 2004.07.05., 18:41: Jim> I use ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 as a firewall I bet ZoleAlarm is the culprit there. Please try to do a mail check with Zonealarm disabled. As I heard on lot of mailing lists, ZA's known to create mysterious network problems with Windows NT/2000/XP, while perhaps being a good firewall choice for the 95/98/ME Windows line. Cheers, SyP -- If at first you don't succeed, try a shorter bungee. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can I globally clear an address book field ?
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 2:23 PM, you wrote: ND> Is there any way that I can clear a single field in every AB record? ND> I've just started using the Nickname field in macros, only to find ND> that it's been occupied by some horrible ex-OL2K random string like ND> this: ce9838d6-f141-4b77-a280-c5113de96572. how about exporting your AB to a CSV ( comma separated values) file, clearing that column, then import it back?? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Rogue
Hello Paul, On 5 Jul 2004 at 06:46:09 -0400 GMT [12:46 CEST] you wrote: PC> this is still a beta item, Leif's stuff, yes. PC> not in the production product, Here you are wrong. Smilies etc are supported in 2.11. PC> so I haven't PC> changed my sig in tbudl. In TBOT I do :) if you want to discuss smileys, PC> do it in tbot or tbbeta, ok ? Why? I use it. And I don't use a beta version. -- Cheers, Andre :andre: "Es gibt zwei Tragödien im Leben: Die eine, daß Dir Dein Herzenswunsch nicht erfüllt wird, die andere, daß er es wird." Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I really need some practical advice - synchronising
Hello Richard, Sunday, July 4, 2004, 10:05:17 PM, Richard H. Stoddard wrote: RHS> I just backup all folders RHS> and run a full restore on the second machine, which at least on mine RHS> overwrites the original message base, meaning the messages that have RHS> been deleted do not reappear. Well I think Marten means on synchronizing, not backup which is why I asked the question earlier. -- Best Regards, :Greg_Strong: Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Rogue
On Monday, July 5, 2004, 4:27 PM, you wrote: AW> Here you are wrong. Smilies etc are supported in 2.11. not completely, totally... yet:) PC>> so I haven't PC>> changed my sig in tbudl. In TBOT I do :) if you want to discuss smileys, PC>> do it in tbot or tbbeta, ok ? AW> Why? I use it. And I don't use a beta version. ok, you can use them, BUT there are other things, including using different MSL files, that only the new version can do.. but you are right, since you can use the feature, we can talk about it here! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0427-2 (04.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can I globally clear an address book field ?
Hello Nick, Monday, July 5, 2004, 8:23:26 PM, you wrote: > Is there any way that I can clear a single field in every AB record? Not really. It is possible to overwrite certain fields globally, but it is not possible to clear globally. If you just want to get rid of trash in certain fields you can overwrite the fields globally with an empty space. (Select AB items -> select Properties [Alt+Enter] -> go to the field you want to overwrite -> enter an empty space -> OK) This solution won't satisfy purists (a space in the field is not an empty field), and it does not work for the nickname field, because TB does not allow duplicates in the nickname fields. I would use Paul's proposition (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- Best regards, Cyrille mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ TB! 2.11.02, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ] Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mails lost!
Hallo rich,
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:36:35 -0400GMT (5-7-2004, 20:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RG>>> Subject: Macromedia coursesjw355q
RG>>> Is obviously spam and the string of spaces gives it away.
RO>> 12 spaces? Would be something \s{12} But it might be that that
RO>> won't match when there's 13 spaces, not sure about that. You could
RO>> also check for between 3 and 50 spaces, that would be \s{3,50}
RG> Think is might catch such spam as a kludge string??
RG> \nSubject:\s{5,60}\n
No, I'd go for \s{5,60} present in subject, your condition would check
for a subject: header with 5 to 60 spaces and nothing else in it.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies
or rabbits.
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Deleting message when downloading header
Hello All, Does TB! still delete the message when the setting is: Delete after download Download only header when Message size > xx kb Is there a plan that they change that so the message will be still on the server. When not than you have to set every thing to be left on the server and then delete them with a filter the next time you get your mail. I find that not practical. Or is there an other way to leaf just big messages on the server and download the rest. (And also get a message so you know there is a big message on the server) -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.11.02, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Now we sit through Shakespeare in order to recognize the quotations. - Oscar Wilde To request my public key select this url: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpG2XDD86haf.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: multiple email addresses for one person in address book?
> You could check the "automatically add the secondary addresses to BCC > field" on the "Other" tab of the address book, address definition > dialog. yup, that worked, but only when i open the address picker dialog and use ">" to add people. if i use auto-complete or group sending, the alternative addresses were not added to bcc... -- Samson, using Agent newsreader Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
One Email Address, Multiple Names
Hello TB User Discussion List, In my family address book, I have multiple entries for the with the same email address. For example: Name Handle Address -- --- Dad dd[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mom mm[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mom & Dad md[EMAIL PROTECTED] My templates use address book macros and pick up the same name no matter whether I enter dd, mm or md. How do I get around this? Here's my new message macro: - %_Addr="%ABToFirstName <%ABToEmail>"%- %To=""%To=%_Addr%- %From="%ABFromFirstName <%ABFromEmail>"%- Dear %ABToFirstName, %Cursor %QInclude="FamSig"%- - -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
