Re: Empty Mail
Hi On Tuesday, 19 October, 2004, at 12:12:34 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: I have not seen TB empty a mail exactly, but I have problems with TB! (or something along the way that affects only TB!) changing the Part boundaries of messages so the file names do not appear correctly. snip The problem is that the name should actually be Draft Cheshire Supporting People Eligibility Criteria v2.8.doc, but it gets chopped at the first space in the file name snip I created a bug report at the time this started affecting me: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2043 I reported that too,as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3396. I have added a note to both reports indicating that they appear to be reporting the same behaviour -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Global hotkey
Hello Chris On 21.October.2004, 9:48 PM (Now: 22.October.2004, 7:47 AM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2004-Oct-21 9:39:52 PM C Global hotkey mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it possible to redefine global hotkey for reply/forward email? I know there is ctrl+enter for reply and shift+entrer for forward but I'd like to have ctrl+r for reply and ctrl+f for forward and also ctrl+n for new.. C View - Edit Shortcut Keys oh my, thanks a lot! -- The Final Cut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thebat: 3.0.2.1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Synchronise 2 installations
Dear All, I want to run TB on my laptop as well as my Desktop and keep the installations in sync. Both could be receiving and sending between synchronizations. My questions are: Does anyone do this on a regular basis? The help file is a bit thin on detail; do I need to create a backup for each sync? (That would be a lengthy process) Or have aI misunderstood the instructions. Thanks -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Synchronise 2 installations
Hallo Paul, On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:57:14 +0100GMT (22-10-2004, 11:57 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PJ The help file is a bit thin on detail; do I need to create a backup PJ for each sync? Yes. PJ (That would be a lengthy process) Yes PJ Or have aI misunderstood the instructions. No. There are two alternatives. 1) Keep messages on server for X days, so that you can download your messages on both systems. (Presuming you use both regularly.) And BCC all your messages to yourself, so that you've got copies of sent messages on both systems. 2) Use IMAP, that way the mail will stay on your server, so you can view it with whatever client you like. -- Groetjes, Roelof Never lean forward to push an invisible object. The Bat! 3.0.1.33 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpZx3LNmxE8m.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quoted text wrong color
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else 22-Okt-2004 06:42, you wrote: I set all the HTML colors to black and plain and the maroon bold style went away. But this was a plain text message so the HTML settings should not have mattered (?). Check which viewer you are using - right-click the message, is there a checkbox in front of the use plain text viewer line? You can configure the behaviour of the two viewers separately, see Preferences | Viewer/Editor - there's two entries, plain text/MicroEd and HTML/Windows Editor. The plain text viewer (PTV) is not just for text-only messages, and the so-called rich text viewer (RTV) is not only used for HTML messages. Different colors for quotes, the signature, etc. etc. are available for text-only messages as well, when using the RTV (I think thats what most people do). -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies :-P After playing the violin for the cellist Gregor Piatigorsky, Albert Einstein asked, Did I play well? - You played relatively well, replied Piatigorsky. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Synchronise 2 installations
Hello Group On Friday, October 22, 2004, 10:57:14 AM, wrote: PJ Dear All, PJ I want to run TB on my laptop as well as my Desktop and keep the PJ installations in sync. Both could be receiving and sending between PJ synchronizations. My questions are: PJ Does anyone do this on a regular basis? PJ The help file is a bit thin on detail; do I need to create a backup PJ for each sync? (That would be a lengthy process) Or have aI PJ misunderstood the instructions. PJ Thanks What about treating the Desktop as the main installation and then running that PC using Remote Desktop / VNC from the Laptop? -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Strange characters in view source
Hello Roelof, On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:10:34 +0200 GMT (22/10/2004, 05:10 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: TF Hello TBBETA, RO Wrong list? No, wrong template. That's because I had first addressed the query to TBBETA but I am not using a beta version, so this mail belonged here. Forgot to change that line above after I had manually changed to TO address. TF Message-ID:?lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED] RO Saw nothing strange in that message. So either it's your system or RO your ISP. It's not my ISP, but something with my system. I use Courier New and see these weird characters. I changed the Source View font to Lucida, and now it displays correctly. Courier New works everywhere else correctly. Never mind, I'll just leave it at Lucida. -- Cheers, Thomas. The difference between a king and a president is that a king is the son of his father but a president is not. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.1.33 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Determiing Reply Type in Macros
Hi On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 11:50:04 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Yes, that's more or less what I said, isn't it? Or are you making a point that I don't get? I don't think I was trying to make a point but I don't appear to have added anything useful. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
-Original Message- From: Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Oct 21, 2004 8:39 AM To: Michael L. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote: I know this and say this because I worked for 16 years in Redmond Washington, for Microsoft Since we remember (from the days of *that* signature of yours *g*) that you are a teacher, critic and ecclesiastic (sp?) philosopher, may I ask what position you did occupy there? [no stab at discrediting you or something ntended, I'd just find it interesting to know what kinda people are working for Microsoft, you know...] I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old items. In this way, MWindows would fill up a hard drive quickly and cause the user to buy a new one. Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have virtually stopped. If 95 or 98 or me is used, the DOS kernal is the most unstable. DOs is not multi-tasking, multi-user or multi-threading, and windoes tries to add all those features while DOs is fighting it. NT is for servers. 200 is bloatware. XP is the first, sort-of departure from old paterns. It too, however, self-corrupts -- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Michael Wilson writes: I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old items. In this way, MWindows would fill up a hard drive quickly and cause the user to buy a new one. There were no such meetings. Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have virtually stopped. If the meetings you mention above had actually taken place, it wouldn't matter how stable XP is. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Hello Michael Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 18:38, you wrote: Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have virtually stopped. Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has *never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My system partition (without additional programs - I have the program files on a different partition) for XP is 4GB; after installation XP took 2GB, and now its at 3.2GB - within about half a year ever since I switched to XP. Hello, where's dem gigs goin' to? I haven't yet peeked into the partition to find out where all that space is lost... BUT: my W2k partition was 2GB and the occupied size (1.5GB) never changed very much. If 95 or 98 or me is used, the DOS kernal is the most unstable. Yes, because it is *MS* DOS... veg DOs is not multi-tasking, multi-user or multi-threading, and windoes tries to add all those features while DOs is fighting it. Plus MS never learned how to implement multitasking and multithreading propperly. Can you say AmigaOS? :-) NT is for servers. 200 is bloatware. XP is the first, sort-of departure from old paterns. It too, however, self-corrupts Given the ratio of performance and stability, the NT series had its peak with W2k - and XP is already a step backwards, there's no denying it. My W2k installation at home (with moderate installation/deinstallation of programs and drivers and stuff over time) never let me down in about three years, the XP installation at work (with an almost *fixed* set of programs and the occasional security updates) is already close to shipwrecked in about one and half years. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies :-P Everything is theoretically possible, until it's done. One could write a history of science in reverse by assembling the solemn pronouncements of highest authority about what could not be done and could never happen. -- Robert A. Heinlein Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Alexander S. Kunz writes: Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has *never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My system partition (without additional programs - I have the program files on a different partition) for XP is 4GB; after installation XP took 2GB, and now its at 3.2GB - within about half a year ever since I switched to XP. Hello, where's dem gigs goin' to? I haven't yet peeked into the partition to find out where all that space is lost... It's not the OS. I've been running XP for years and there has been no increase in disk usage. You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right? Plus MS never learned how to implement multitasking and multithreading propperly. Can you say AmigaOS? :-) It is done correctly in the NT-based versions of Windows. Other versions of Windows left much to be desired, but they were no worse than other desktop operating systems of their generation. Given the ratio of performance and stability, the NT series had its peak with W2k - and XP is already a step backwards, there's no denying it. MS adds bells and whistles to please it's largely unsophisticated customer base. It destabilizes the OS but it pleases the average-Joe consumer. ... the XP installation at work (with an almost *fixed* set of programs and the occasional security updates) is already close to shipwrecked in about one and half years. I've had no trouble with XP in years (it has been several years since I first installed it, I'm not sure how many). -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else 22-Okt-2004 19:43, you wrote: You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right? Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there, so I'll just stop here... :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies :-P I have not the smallest molecule of faith in aerial navigation other than ballooning. -- William Thomas Kelvin Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Synchronise 2 installations
Roelof, Could I just sync all the files in the mail directory when I am going to work on the laptop? and reverse the process when I get back. I know this does not help with both machines receiving/sending between sync, but it may be workable for me. Thanks -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Synchronise 2 installations
On Friday, 22 October 2004 at 17:38 (UK time), Paul Jansen said: Could I just sync all the files in the mail directory when I am going to work on the laptop? and reverse the process when I get back. This is exactly what I do Paul, although for a different reason. I've never had a problem as both set-ups are identical or as identical as they can be. -- Paul White Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 (Home Edition) on Windows 98 (4.10.1998) Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Template for replies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 15:45:16 -0700, when Michael L. Wilson wrote:
TB UDL ERS,
I am looking for a good template for replies where it can tell the
originating time and date and author.
Here it goes:
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERSWas
another beautiful day,%SUBPATT=2,
@ @ at %SUBPATT=3%SUBPATT=4, which is few hours more or less
where I live, when %TONAME wrote:
- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast
[Earth LOG: 48 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQFBeYin9q62QPd3XuIRAmUZAJ4xIYNO7z8hvtvIuYC5pHj3dQNGhACfUJ/u
G7uhoco+pKmtwljGRZsR7zs=
=Yg7E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Need help restoring TheBat!
I had to reload Windows OS (Win98SE) today. I make it a practice to keep applications off the C: drive whenever possible, so that it is mostly a matter of getting the registry updated correctly. So, I have the data files for TheBat! intact on separate drive. I'm currently a version of TheBat! on another machine in order to pick up email. I haven't been able to figure out how to re-install TheBat! and make the original data files accessible. After re-install, TheBat! asks for a new account to be setup. I would just as soon use all the old account information but I haven't found how I can direct TheBat! to use it. Has anyone had to do something like this and can recommend an approach. -- Best regards, Lawrence Johnson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need help restoring TheBat!
Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:31:44 PM, you wrote: LJ I had to reload Windows OS (Win98SE) today. I make it a practice to keep LJ applications off the C: drive whenever possible, so that it is mostly LJ a matter of getting the registry updated correctly. LJ So, I have the data files for TheBat! intact on separate drive. I'm LJ currently a version of TheBat! on another machine in order to pick up LJ email. LJ I haven't been able to figure out how to re-install TheBat! and make LJ the original data files accessible. After re-install, TheBat! asks LJ for a new account to be setup. I would just as soon use all the old LJ account information but I haven't found how I can direct TheBat! to LJ use it. LJ Has anyone had to do something like this and can recommend an LJ approach. I had this problem once. It was a while ago so I might be wrong in my advice. I think typed in the name of the old account when it asked me for a new account name. It will recognize the folders and pop you should see all of your old folders and messages. Hope this helps! -- David Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.davidshep.net Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
