Re: Was I dreaming...?
Monday, May 2, 2005, 7:12:20 AM, Marek wrote: MM> new version 3.5 with major changes in GUI will be released in May, we MM> have first Release Candidate actually. Thank goodness for that. Thunderbird is installed and in partial use already. I updated bug 2094 (yes, it is that old) in the hopes it will receive some attention. I'm not holding my breath. Status after 17 months is "reviewed". -- Cheers, Allister :flag-newzealand: New Zealand / Aotearoa Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filtering issue
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 1:55:16 AM, you wrote: M3> Hello All, M3> Just as of today I have been hammered by a significant increase in M3> spam. I can deal with that. But one thing did confuse me. One of the M3> spam messages ended up in my "known" folder and I checked my address M3> book three times to be sure and neither the From nor the To address M3> appear in my address book. So can someone offer a suggestion as to why M3> this email would have gotten sent to the "Known" folder? (I have M3> included the message header bewlow in case that will help) M3> TIA Similar events occur to me. Spam emails seemingly addressed to other people are delivered to me. My internet provider says the senders put in some part of your name-address somewhere in the email. I can see no sign of this in the header, and have not bothered to look inside the message text. Just shows that the spammers keep learning new tricks. I rely mainly on positive filters in the bat, like "known", and can live with that. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Short Cut Key for Junk Mail
Hello Jeff Gaines & everyone else, on 04-Mai-2005 at 20:55 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote: > Is it possible to allocate a short cut key to mark junk mail? I don't know as I'm not using BayesIt, but... > I have a hundred or so that would be good for training but I'm wearing my > trackpad out :-) You can simply mark all of them and select "Mark as junk" from the right-mouse context menu. I'd suggest you do the same with your Sent mail folder so that you'll have a good dictionary of legitimate mails. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) [Crash programs] fail because they are all based on the theory that, with nine women pregnant, you can get a baby a month. -- Wernher von Braun Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Back to a LDAP question
Hello Claude, Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 10:40:00 PM, you [CR] wrote: CR> Could a Ritlabs developper tell me, if this is planned in the near CR> future ? I'd be very glad to hear their comments as well. Thanks, Tero -- Tero Ripattila Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Back to a LDAP question
Hi Tbudler, Recently, on the TBBETA mailing list, I was told that currently The Bat! did not support the LDAP V3 specifications. Could a Ritlabs developper tell me, if this is planned in the near future ? Greetings, -- Claude Renaud Skype : Name : renaud_claude Number : 0870445179 Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Short Cut Key for Junk Mail
Hello Jeff, A reminder of what Jeff Gaines typed on: May 4, 2005 at 19:55:41 GMT +0100 JG> I have just installed the Bayesit add in (v 0.8.0) in an attempt to JG> control junk, unfortunately my hosting service doesn't have very JG> effective controls. JG> Is it possible to allocate a short cut key to mark junk mail? I have a JG> hundred or so that would be good for training but I'm wearing my JG> trackpad out :-) Hang on for a few days. Once V3.5 is released you will be able to, but not before and not in your version. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC2 Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.2 On Windows 2000 5.0 Build #2195 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Short Cut Key for Junk Mail
Hello Group I have just installed the Bayesit add in (v 0.8.0) in an attempt to control junk, unfortunately my hosting service doesn't have very effective controls. Is it possible to allocate a short cut key to mark junk mail? I have a hundred or so that would be good for training but I'm wearing my trackpad out :-) -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper
Marten- Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:46:35 PM, you wrote: >>> The Bat! Nailclipper Mobile Enail Client >> Sounds Great but what is the URL. MG> Is it? No. It is a pronoun. What is the URL. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper
Hello David, On Tue, 3 May 2005 20:44:56 +0100 GMT (04/05/2005, 02:44 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE> Sounds Great but what is the URL. There are two: http://www.turnofftheinternet.com http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html -- Cheers, Thomas. Kripo greift zu: "Uber hundert Einbruche gehen auf ihr Konto." * Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SMTP problem solved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 4 May 2005, @ @ at 12:41:19 +0200, when Vili wrote: > I reflected the _tone_ of Peter's email. Read it again: "Well, if > server is OK and address is OK and server moans about address, either > one must be not OK. Quite obvious, isn't it?" > "Quite obvious, isn't it?" Do you feel the tone? I reflected to this > _tone_... Not your first sentence. Ah there, days of "hypersensitivity" ride again. No please, please no. [By the voice of Eddie Murphy.] I can stand a hammer breaking my leg but cannot stand a whining. It really ruins and tortures me. Please stop it. Vili, beware of "nice" tone delivering bad information. (-; Peter delivered a *good* one, stimulating you to think straightly. I really do not see any..."tone" in it, being very "special". It indeed is quite obvious and that's it. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://bardo.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 245 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector via Wine... ~~~ For PM please use my full address as it is *exactly* given in my "From|Reply To" field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFCeL4J9q62QPd3XuIRAiAOAJ9JL3wcEiZGZdBl0EHVMWbOnWEI7ACdFzD/ cdIP5n3CGJ5GE7ZI5XPGNvk= =CBXf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and PGPDisk
Hello Richard, Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 8:08:17 AM, you wrote: > Ive been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but > have been thinking of an interim solution using PGPDisk. Would it slow > down TB! downloads, etc., to move the message folders to an encrypted > disk? Obviously the encrypted disk would need to be opened before > opening TB!, but can anyone suggest any other potential issues? You might check out the following for ideas: http://dekart.com/support/howto/Howto-encrypt-TheBat-PrivateDisk/ Some good examples that could be applied to PGP. -- Best regards, Jim Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SMTP problem solved
Hello Peter and Alexander, TBs>> I am happy, that you also learnt something from this case :))) TBs>> If nothing else, than this: if you don't have anything to say, TBs>> please be quiet. Peter: PP> *erm* OK. Guess you're the right one to distinguish if I've PP> anything to say or not. Thanks for your advice, you might have PP> prevented me from ending in a dead-end street because of me saying PP> things albeit I haven't to say any ... Alexander: ASK>With comments like this, I'd say you have to start with yourself. I reflected the _tone_ of Peter's email. Read it again: "Well, if server is OK and address is OK and server moans about address, either one must be not OK. Quite obvious, isn't it?" "Quite obvious, isn't it?" Do you feel the tone? I reflected to this _tone_... Not your first sentence. -- Vili Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SMTP problem solved
Hello The, On Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 3:25:01 AM The [TBs] wrote: TBs> I did not change anything, the problem went away... Glad to hear, glad for you. TBs> So Peter (Palmreuther): it is not as obvious as you thought... Above cited sentence tells me: it is. Obviously the server had a problem in recognizing the recipients domain name as (syntactically) correct, and this issue was fixed by the servers admin (or healed itself if the cause was a lookup to a database and something modified the database accordingly). It *is* obvious something on either server side or in the recipients address was wrong. TBs> I am happy, that you also learnt something from this case :))) If TBs> nothing else, than this: if you don't have anything to say, TBs> please be quiet. *erm* OK. Guess you're the right one to distinguish if I've anything to say or not. Thanks for your advice, you might have prevented me from ending in a dead-end street because of me saying things albeit I haven't to say any ... -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) "I don't care who does the electing as long as I get to do the nominating" Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
