Just Discovered Bayes Filter

2005-01-13 Thread BJH
Hi

I've been a user of Mailwasher Pro for a good while and generally I'm very 
happy with it but its a pain to have two programs running for mail sorting 
and collection. :(

I'm just trying out Bayes Filter and it seems to answer my needs. My only 
gripe at the moment is the 'hidden' menu selections to mark mail as junk
or 
not.

Am I missing something?

Can I have a convenient button or just one right click without having to 
navigate menu levels?

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The List and Dialog

2005-02-03 Thread BJH
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:42:08 +0100, daRkSidE wrote:

> In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
> 
>> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
>> d> by email, IIRC.
>>  But I've already had that about three weeks ago?
> 
> I can't explain, I don't know exactly gmane mechanism. It was a long 
> time I didn't post here, and, after having sent the reply to you, I've 
> been required to authorize again. Dunno, try again posting or contact 
> gmane staff.

OK, if I've solved this mystery then everyone will see this post via Gmane
which apparently requires genuine email addresses so my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't allowed.

-- 
Regards
Barry



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The List and Dialog

2005-02-03 Thread BJH
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:22:16 +, BJH wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:42:08 +0100, daRkSidE wrote:
> 
>> In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>> 
>>> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
>>> d> by email, IIRC.
>>>  But I've already had that about three weeks ago?
>> 
>> I can't explain, I don't know exactly gmane mechanism. It was a long 
>> time I didn't post here, and, after having sent the reply to you, I've 
>> been required to authorize again. Dunno, try again posting or contact 
>> gmane staff.
> 
> OK, if I've solved this mystery then everyone will see this post via Gmane
> which apparently requires genuine email addresses so my
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't allowed.

Very interesting, in Dialog my email came up as gobbledygook (see above)
but from TBudl in came through as intended as "barryh at nospam dot kentra
dot co dot uk"

-- 
Regards
Barry



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The List and Dialog

2005-02-03 Thread BJH
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 06:21:29 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:

> On Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 5:26:50 AM [GMT -0500], Bjh wrote:
> 
>> Very interesting, in Dialog my email came up as gobbledygook (see
>> above) but from TBudl in came through as intended as "barryh at
>> nospam dot kentra dot co dot uk"
> 
> That's by design. The Gmane server scrambles/obfuscates any text
> resembling an email address.

Thanks Allie, everything seems to working fine and I understand what's
going on, so I'll stop hogging the bandwidth!

-- 
Regards
Barry



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Trying to understand Bayesit

2005-02-04 Thread BJH
Hi all

I've been trying out Bayesit now found a few days and I'm struggling to
come to terms with how this plug-in is *supposed* to work.

It seems to me that in simple terms the plugin assigns a 'score' to each
email, and dependent on the score allocated TB determines what ultimately
happens to that email.

I've been 'training' or at least telling TB what is junk over the last few
days. Currently 107 spam mails against 170 genuine.

I've had a look at the bayesit log file and it seems to me that the score
applied to every mail that has come in is 1! If this is the correct line:

Value for The Bat!: 1

If it isn't then I would like to understand the log file more; if it is the
score then what's going on?

Does anyone know of anything that explains the function of Bayesit in a
little more depth? Cos I'm sure that the reason it doesn't appear to be
working for me is a lack of understanding on my part.

-- 
Regards
Barry

Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Trying to understand Bayesit

2005-02-04 Thread BJH
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:14:40 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

> @4-Feb-2005, 13:56 BJH [B] in
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 
> ... 
> 
> B> I've been 'training' or at least telling TB what is junk over the
> B> last few days. Currently 107 spam mails against 170 genuine.
> 
> Keep going. After about 500 spams you'll have enough data in the
> dictionaries to start getting some measure of accuracy.
> 
> ... 
> 
> B> If it isn't then I would like to understand the log file more; if
> B> it is the score then what's going on?
> 
> It is the score for now. Once the dictionaries have more data you'll
> get better results.

Thanks Marck, I'll continue to persevere. :-)

-- 
Best regards
Barry

Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Help with Bayesit

2005-02-07 Thread BJH
Hi

I don't know what I'm doing wrong but I must be doing something wrong!

Bayesit is now reporting 100% Spam Errors

This is right 'cos I'm having to mark all incoming spam. Nothing is being
'junked'.

Spam Frequency Dict: 77 letters 7851 words
Non-spam dict: 1060 letters 32965 words

Spam errors (emails): 100%
Spam errors (traffic): 100%

non-Spam errors (emails): 0%
non-Spam errors (traffic): 0%

Any suggestions?

Otherwise its back to Mailwasher Pro. But then it does work.

-- 
Best regards
Barry

Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


How to Zap Velva Woollen

2005-02-10 Thread BJH
Hi

Every day I get about 20-50 virus mails from "Velva Woollen"

Not a problem more an irritation.

Can I set up a filter that would delete them off the server without
downloading them?

Any suggestions gratefully received.

-- 
Best regards
Barry

Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How to Zap Velva Woollen

2005-02-10 Thread BJH
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:14:59 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote:

> B> Can I set up a filter that would delete them off the server without
> B> downloading them?
 
> Create a selective download filter with the appropriate condition.

Thanks Roelof, I'll give that a go...

-- 
Best regards
Barry

Using TB version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


3.5 Fade In/Out Menus?

2005-05-15 Thread BJH
Hi

I'm finding my way around 3.5 and I've noticed that right-click menus are
slow to display on my computer, faidng in and out quite slowly.

Is this a Windows XP thing or a hidden setting in in V3.5?

Can't seem to find any setting that can speed this up..

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Some help with IMAP

2005-11-05 Thread BJH
Hi

OK I'm a complete newbie to IMAP, sorry.

I've grasped the concept of all messages being located on the remote
server, in my case my ISP, and I've made the connection and seen it
work. Very cool to see a new message immediately appear in the Inbox.

So, if I want to keep a message on the local PC I guess I can copy the
message from the remote Inbox to a local folder.

But, do I create the local folder as part of the IMAP account or do I
create a 'Common Folder' or a 'Virtual Folder'.

If someone can give me some pointers I'm sure I'll get to grips with
it.

And how does the likes of BayesIT deal with remote spam?

Oh, I'll have to go another message has popped up!! :)

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Some help with IMAP

2005-11-05 Thread BJH
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:08:36 -0600, Dwight A Corrin wrote:

> On Saturday, November 5, 2005, 7:01:29 AM, BJH wrote:
> 
>> But, do I create the local folder as part of the IMAP account or do
>> I create a 'Common Folder' or a 'Virtual Folder'.
> 
> If you create a folder in you IMAP account, it won't be local. You
> need a common folder. That will reside on your local drive. A virtual
> folder doesn't contain anything, hence the name.

Thanks, so what's the point of a virtual folder?

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Some help with IMAP

2005-11-06 Thread BJH
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:08:14 -0600, Dwight A Corrin wrote:

> it can collect things from lots of folders, based upon specific
> criteria, but it is virtual, it only links to the actual messages,
> it doesn't recreate them in its own confines.

Thanks Dwight, now I've grasped that feature.

IMAP seems to work well for me, but I'm not sure which I prefer. I can
see the reason for wanting to store all my mail at one location, but,
I also like the idea of downloading mails from the server to a local
machine. To me it 'feels' more secure. ;)

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Some help with IMAP

2005-11-06 Thread BJH
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:30:01 -0500, Curtis wrote:

>> For me, this is one of the great benefits of IMAP, the other being
>> that I can access identical mail structures from wherever I happen
>> to be without a lot of fiddly synchronisation every day.
 
> Additionally, there's nothing preventing you from using filters or
> manually copying your messages to local folders. There's your
> backup.

OK I can see your point of view. I just need to change my methodology
and learn a different way of working.

I assume that I can have different folders on the server for day to
day filtering? And then selectively pull down emails that I feel need
to be on the local machine.

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Help with IMAP

2005-11-12 Thread BJH
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:12:16 +, The Janitor wrote:

> NOD32, www.eset.com.

Thanks for that. For the moment I've decided to stick with POP and
AVG, if only for the reason that I've recently paid for 12 months of
AVG professional so I intend to get my money's worth. And, the one
machine I was trialling IMAP on caught an email virus within hours; I
guess because AVG couldn't cope with IMAP?

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-10 Thread BJH
Hi

Suddendly my installation of TheBat! has gone pear shaped!

I keep getting the following error:

"Thread creation error: Not enough storage is available to process 
this command"

Eh?

The error seems to occur whenever a folder is accessed.

How many Gigabytes does it need?

I've got a minimum 20Gb free on all partitions, 512Mb RAM running 
XPSP2 with all updates, all drives are kept defragged by PerfectDisk 7 
and my 'temp' folder is clean.

What more can I do?

-- 
Best regards
Barry

Using TheBat! 3.65.03 and BayesIt 0.8.4



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: one email is stuck on server - why?

2006-05-06 Thread BJH
On Sat, 6 May 2006 15:42:07 +1000, Tom wrote:

> just encountered a funny issue.

Hi Tom, I have an email that is 0 bytes long with no subject and
marked as unread on the server that can't do anything with, my ISP has
investigated and told me that there is a bug in their system that
sometimes causes this and they are trying to fix it.

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Concurrent Connections?

2006-11-18 Thread BJH
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:48:36 -0600, Chris W. wrote:

> Barry @ 2006-11-14 8:25:46 AM
> "Concurrent Connections?" 
> 
>> So account 1 first, when that's completed account 2, and finally
>> after account 2 then account 3.
> 
> Are these accounts are the same server perhaps? If so, the server
> configuration has probably changed to allow fewer simultaneous
> connections.

Hi Chris

Yes, they are on the same server and I notice that sometimes they do
run concurrently, so I guess it must be down to the load on the
server.

Thanks

-- 
Best regards
Barry



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html