Re: new feature wished
Hello DG, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:36:51 -0500 GMT (27/02/03, 19:36 +0700 GMT), DG Raftery Sr. wrote: Electronic Arts, as you, does not care when I created the message but I do. Should a programming problem arise I can go back to my sent folder and get an extremely good idea of when I created the message text and not when I saved it to my outbox or sent it. I think here is a problem in TB. In the Sent box (or whereever I move sent mails to), it will show the same time stamp under Saved and Created, namely when I saved it for sending. I would prefer one to show the created time, and the other to show the sent time. Currently there is no way of knowing when the message was actually sent. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. That money talks, I'll not deny. I heard it once. It said, good-bye. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Hallo Thomas, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:51:35 +0700GMT (27-2-03, 17:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TF Currently there is no way of knowing when the message was actually TF sent. It could be done with an outgoing filter. (Maybe a series, I'm not sure whether it can be done with only one.) Export the sent message Import it in whatever folder you'd like Delete it from the outbox. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:23:42 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 00:23 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: TF Currently there is no way of knowing when the message was actually TF sent. It could be done with an outgoing filter. (Maybe a series, I'm not sure whether it can be done with only one.) Probably. I would prefer TB to show the sent time automatically. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. At the evening service tonight, the sermon topic will be What is Hell? Come early and listen to the choir practice. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Fiber, On 26-02-2003 04:37, you [F] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: F What about a shortcut key that would go to the next unread F message no matter in what account is this message? A sort of F universal CTRL + ] People have been asking for this for a _long_ time. I think it's strange it hasn't been implemented yet. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 1.63 Beta/7 /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1/os Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Hello Peter, People have been asking for this for a _long_ time. I think it's strange it hasn't been implemented yet. Developers don't have the time. They are busy implementing a new tab in the message pane (window) to display the RFC-822 headers, which is a real need felt by everyone ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
- Original Message - From: Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:45 PM Subject: Re: new feature wished Developers don't have the time. They are busy implementing a new tab in the message pane (window) to display the RFC-822 headers, which is a real need felt by everyone ;-) I really don't understand developers... They are busy implementing new features for The Bat! 1.xx, but what about The Bat! 2? Will it ever be released? I already doubt it... -- Edvinas Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Edvinas, @26-Feb-2003, 20:12 +0200 (18:12 UK time) Edvinas Matiusaitis said: Developers don't have the time. They are busy implementing a new tab in the message pane (window) to display the RFC-822 headers, which is a real need felt by everyone ;-) I really don't understand developers... They are busy implementing new features for The Bat! 1.xx, but what about The Bat! 2? Will it ever be released? I already doubt it... The developers are now split into two teams in two separate locations. One, headed up by Stefan, is going to work on the v1 series, which will continue to be available and improved after v2 is out and about. The other is working hard on v2. Does that help your understanding? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+XQcpOeQkq5KdzaARAvBHAJ9QkfscL0FSAfZZSoTw4+iubgGneACgpJof W3DwCOnsvaDZIZCLkKMK8Cs= =s+1b -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Edvinas Matiusaitis wrote: EM I really don't understand developers... They are busy implementing new EM features for The Bat! 1.xx, but what about The Bat! 2? Will it ever be EM released? I already doubt it... This looks like a nice try to speed them up, but I think they are probably already working hard as they can. -- Regards, John Morse You can pick your friends and you can pick your nose, but you can't wipe your friends on the couch Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Hello DG, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:56:41 PM RE: new feature wished Greetings Edvinas, On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 1:12:20 PM, you wrote: Can I ask you something with all respect? I know the first two line can't be avoided if you use PGP. But what about repeating the date, Time and Subject (plus two blank lines) in the body of the message? Are they really necessary when that same information is just a little above on the header pane? I ask you because, I admit it, I am curious about your reasons and also because I am quite lazy about having to scroll a message down when it actually would not be necessary ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, DG Raftery Sr. wrote... I do this because I have quite a bit of business correspondence daily and I want to insure, REGARDLESS of transport (MTA) and display time, that once I affix my PGP signature, utilizing the new or reply templates that I have here, that there is NO doubt on the receiver end at what time I created the reply. So ... To answer your question YES. There is a strict, procedural reason why I do this. Not to jump in or anything... but I somehow don't think the people on the list are *that* worried about that kind of information being that valid. As a second point... Monday, March 3, 2003 :) Sorry ;) PGP Signed to boot :) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPl1LniuD6BT4/R9zEQI8xACghwdhLB3y8F53VWEaH648PvGLjZIAoP2H 8hc0FAvyTaAv93a1/GOXSI2v =aqn5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote... I affix my PGP signature Monday, March 3, 2003 :) Sorry ;) PGP Signed to boot :) I also forgot to point out... PGP signatures have a date/time stamp in them anyway. If the person is really curious at when you signed the email to send it... then that'd be the place to look... not what you wrote. Of course... you can set your clock back on your pc, and do all kinds of fancy tricks... but hey - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA+AwUBPl1N2SuD6BT4/R9zEQLg+QCg6+fKd7+CO0cpTa/pB8mVvFoC2TQAmMcX fvtIa1bvKlBkrnmhC8KCZAI= =Nmcj -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: new feature wished
Hello DG, OK, I understand your reasons business correspondence. Just like me. I spend must of my day reading and writing business correspondence. But, if I use here the same templates I use for business correspondence, I will top post and full quote (like I am doing now :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Maybe I should use my business signature also (and this is not a Cookie :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:02:17 PM RE: new feature wished Greetings Miguel, On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 3:45:52 PM, you wrote: MAU But what about repeating the date, Time and Subject (plus two blank MAU lines) in the body of the message? Are they really necessary when MAU that same information is just a little above on the header pane? The header pane does not reflect actual information. Just sent and received and it may be deceiving based on the MUA used. I do this because I have quite a bit of business correspondence daily and I want to insure, REGARDLESS of transport (MTA) and display time, that once I affix my PGP signature, utilizing the new or reply templates that I have here, that there is NO doubt on the receiver end at what time I created the reply. So ... To answer your question YES. There is a strict, procedural reason why I do this. Sorry. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. Never trust a stockbroker who's married to a travel agent. The_Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Business Security 6.0 iQA/AwUBPl1JaDaPwvRMcz9cEQIdMwCgu2dcvsi+9A6oQE+X6EC0MgXJI9gAoM2y N8jiKrTQzvco/5zNsleo6DRU =+1Md -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
