Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Ming-Li

On Monday, March 19, 2001 at 21:06:09 -0500 Jan Rifkinson wrote:

   I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs 
   I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common
   denominator.

Looks like your system have been messed up pretty badly. Your
hardware configuration is impressive (I envy you), but that won't
prevent Windows are other mischievous software from messing it up
quickly.

If it's a new machine (looks like so) and you're just setting it up,
I would suggest starting from scratch and do it right. I mentioned a
freeware utility yesterday called InCtrl that would track your
system changes, and I suggest using it from day one. For years it's
always been the first thing I install after the OS, and then I track
every move by every software installation.

Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been
preinstalled for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Nick Andriash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On March 20, 2001, at 7:49:00 AM, Ming-Li wrote:

 Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been preinstalled
 for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug.

That is one reason I won't even look at an engineered System like Dell. If
I were him, I would do as you say and start from scratch, and make sure
not to install any of the junk that Dell may have given him in the form of
CD's. I've never heard of InCtrl, but the concept is sound practise.


Nick

  _
 -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
[ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10  A ] 
  [ GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]  
  __

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.60
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iD8DBQE6t34CxQKEdHuj/c4RAki2AKD6pj0TH7hsUprnaUtZmW/0YVHnSgCeN1ze
wiOSKzE1I69cKyZ2Wly3NKE=
=JgJ3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation (OT)

2001-03-20 Thread Roel

Hi Jan

On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:06:09 -0500GMT
   (which was 20/03/2001, 3:06 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:

JR   System:
JR   Dell 8100
JR   OS: Win Me
JR   CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
JR   HD: 60 gig (49 free)
JR   RAM: 384 meg

Now that's a beautifull system, but why on earth are you running
Windows ME on that? Win2k would be a much better choice IMHO, unless
you're really into playing games g

-- 
 Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
 Roel   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com *

Brevity is the soul of lingerie.

 Using The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 on Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 1
 with an Amd Athlon 700 @ 256 MB  96Gb Hd



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 11:30:31 -0500 Jan Rifkinson wrote:

   However, the two programs which seem to contribute most often to
   a system shut down have been Explorer 5.5  The Bat! That's why
   I brought this problem to the list to begin with. First it was
   the canvas handle error msg  then the latest. If you (or anyone
   else) has a notion of how/why TB! might be in conflict by the
   error msg I supplied I'd appreciate your input.

I'm no expert, but I'm afraid the error msg doesn't say much. Access
violation could be caused by a bunch of things, and unless you have
a debugger to see who is trying to access what in the memory,
nothing much can be discerned from the msg per se.

If I have to guess, the mapi32.dll installed by TB might be in
conflict with other MAPI servers/clients, IF (and it's a big if) the
problem is really caused by TB. It's just pure speculation, though.

   If I start from scratch, I'm considering a Win2000 installation
   which I understand is the most stable of the MS OS products. This
   will definitely cause me start from scratch as I'm told I will have
   to re-format my HD although I'm not sure why.

If you want to use NTFS, reformatting your HD is a necessity.
Otherwise, it's not. Still, it's a good idea. It makes sure you get
rid of everything installed under WinME. (Win2k also use "%system
drive\Program Files" as the default program directory, so if you mix
two OS on one partition, you'll end up with a mixed c:\program file
directory.)

Another point to consider: you have a big HD, why not divide it into
several partitions. At least, separating program partition and data
partition would simplify backup jobs significantly.

   No matter, I'd be interested in DLing the 'InCtrl' utility if you
   can point me to your archived msg that relates to it as I'd like to
   read it.

It's a free PC Magazine utility, and you'll find them on ZDNet. Mine
is InCtrl5 version 1.0, which I'm not sure is the newest. (Could be,
it's released last December.) If you want to use it on Win2k, make
sure you get InCtrl5 or higher. Earlier versions have some minor
problem with Win2k registry. (I believe some versions of InCtrl3 and
InCtrl4 are still on ZDNet, because they're treated as different
utilities, not different versions of the same utility--a stupid
error by the naming scheme, IMHO.)

Ming-Li Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been
Ming-Li preinstalled for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug.

   A real PITA.

A friend once called me for help for she couldn't connect to the
Internet with her new Dell machine. I checked and found a hole on
the back of the machine. It turned out they didn't install the NIC.
The worst part was, the NIC was IN the machine; it's just not fixed
on a expansion slot! IOW, it had been floating and banging around
inside the machine all the way to her. So much for the no. 1 brand.
:-)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Jan!

On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 5:30:31 PM you wrote:

   However, the two programs which seem to contribute most often to a
   system shut down have been Explorer 5.5  The Bat! That's why I
   brought this problem to the list to begin with. First it was the
   canvas handle error msg  then the latest. If you (or anyone else)
   has a notion of how/why TB! might be in conflict by the error msg I
   supplied I'd appreciate your input.

I can't help you directly but confirm that TB! seems to be a bit on
the sensitive site concerning memory.

On my machine I have a tool (FreeMem Pro) to free memory that is not
used. At start up I usually free everything there is (out of 128 MB
about 84 to 88 MB). If I during this process start TB! - which should
not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes
gets an Access Violation or just plain hangs/crashes. Luckily it's
only TB! and not the system, which has never crashed due to TB! as far
as one can tell. If I then shut down TB! (Task Manager) and restart
it, no problem anymore.

Hope this will help us to find the real problem and solution.

- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/1

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Wenn ich mir eine Art Mensch ausdenke, die allen meinen Instinkten
zuwiderluft, so wird immer ein Deutscher daraus. (Friedrich
Nietzsche)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy:  The core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOreFxPTo1oA8g8dLEQL8KQCeOo9mgrNpqo8jhwPus/hwkJX5EgwAn1E4
KEjZrl7ogEnQLZj2Lj2TUqQD
=aSaN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas

Hallo Dierk,

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:30:49 +0100 GMT (21/03/2001, 01:30 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:

DH On my machine I have a tool (FreeMem Pro) to free memory that is not
DH used. At start up I usually free everything there is (out of 128 MB
DH about 84 to 88 MB). If I during this process start TB! - which should
DH not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes
DH gets an Access Violation or just plain hangs/crashes.

*While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do
you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that
TB needs to have in memory, so it will through it out prematurely.

DH If I then shut down TB! (Task Manager) and restart it, no problem
DH anymore.

You see?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

The colder the X-ray table, the more of your body is required on it. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas!

On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 6:46:06 PM you wrote:

 *While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do
 you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that
 TB needs to have in memory, so it will through it out prematurely.

Well, actually FreeMem Pro can do this. Usually when I do it for other
progs (and sometimes even TB!) there is no problem.

AFAIR you can find it`s on my homepage (http://Write4U.de) under
Extras/Computer/Systemhelfer.

Oh, BTW, the reason I posted it for Jan *was* exactly that I should
not fire up TB! during my first round of freeing memory. So what I
did, was describing a controlled (more or less) experiment.

- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/1

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

If all men acted from enlightened self interest, the world would be  a
paradise in comparison to what it is. (Bertrand Russell)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy:  The core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOreP+vTo1oA8g8dLEQKazACcCtK4zE5CM/IKCKl2hA+7jpK0jSsAoPrL
bU9nynLMmeSeIVP9kDHUCld2
=l33f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Bruno Haineault

Jan,

I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB,
running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am
currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-)

Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed
and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set
of three "restore" CD-ROMs).

I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net
application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and
what is being changed during an installation.

Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.

By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went
awry?

Bruno (Oceanside, California)

- Original Message -
From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM
Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation


 OK Bat Fans, Here's a test.

   Tell me what the following means  what some possible causes might
   be:

   'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750'

   System:
   Dell 8100
   OS: Win Me
   CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
   HD: 60 gig (49 free)
   RAM: 384 meg

   I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs  I'm
   trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator.

   TIA

 --
 Jan Rifkinson
 Ridgefield, CT USA
 Using TB! v1.51
 ICQ 41116329



 --
 __
 Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
 Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Bruno Haineault

Jan,

I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB,
running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am
currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-)

Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed
and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set
of three "restore" CD-ROMs).

I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net
application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and
what is being changed during an installation.

Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.

By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went
awry?

Bruno (Oceanside, California)

- Original Message -
From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM
Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation


 OK Bat Fans, Here's a test.

   Tell me what the following means  what some possible causes might
   be:

   'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750'

   System:
   Dell 8100
   OS: Win Me
   CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
   HD: 60 gig (49 free)
   RAM: 384 meg

   I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs  I'm
   trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator.

   TIA

 --
 Jan Rifkinson
 Ridgefield, CT USA
 Using TB! v1.51
 ICQ 41116329



 --
 __
 Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
 Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation

2001-03-20 Thread Bruno Haineault

Jan,

I have TheBat! installed on my HP Pavilion 8754c, PIII-800/192MB/30GB,
running WindowsME. I had no problems installing this application. I am
currently evaluating The Bat! versus OLE 5.5 ;-)

Like your DELL machine, mine came with a bunch of applications pre-installed
and no stand-alone Windows ME CD-ROM (this is MS' new policy... only a set
of three "restore" CD-ROMs).

I do use "InCtrl 5" (do a web search and you will find it... a ZD Net
application). It is a great tool to track what is being placed where and
what is being changed during an installation.

Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.

By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something went
awry?

Bruno (Oceanside, California)

- Original Message -
From: "Jan Rifkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:06 PM
Subject: TB! v1.51 - Access Violation


 OK Bat Fans, Here's a test.

   Tell me what the following means  what some possible causes might
   be:

   'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750'

   System:
   Dell 8100
   OS: Win Me
   CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
   HD: 60 gig (49 free)
   RAM: 384 meg

   I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs  I'm
   trying to sort them out to see if there is a common denominator.

   TIA

 --
 Jan Rifkinson
 Ridgefield, CT USA
 Using TB! v1.51
 ICQ 41116329



 --
 __
 Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
 Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org