Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-25 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

Monday, February 24, 2003, 4:15:58 PM, you wrote:

MDP> know. The place to have this discussion is surely TBBETA where
MDP> Stefan can chip in with the facts.

I'll take this as a tame dead horse.

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote:

MDP> You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link
MDP> to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-)

 One point for Marck.

But that *does* get us back on track. Here's what I (currently) think
about this:

Yes, the RFC does quite explicitly state that whitespace characters
can end the field and this is a malformed url and therefore there's
nothing really wrong with the way The Bat! is behaving here. But... OE
*does* pick up the whole string, or so I've been told, not wanting to
venture close enough to that beast to try it for myself.

There's nothing technically hard about grabbing the whole thing -
Windows does it quite easily. Right-click on the Feedback link, copy
it to the clipboard, and paste it into your favorite text editor -
there's the whole subject line, copied from the link, spaces and all.

Grabbing the whole subject line from the link is also not a violation
of the RFC - whitespace *can* end the tag, and technically you're
supposed to translate the spaces to %20s and it's considered bad form
if you don't, but I don't see a problem with TB working the way people
expect it to instead of minimally conforming to the RFC.

If the next version of TB were modified to act on the whole link
instead of just the strict-interpretation subset I don't think it
would break any existing behavior.


And now I'm quite confused about the double-quotes in the registry
thing. I thought this was just the thing it was supposed to fix up. Do
you have a url for one where it does make a difference?

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,

On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 14:19:39GMT + (which was
9:19 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:

S>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback

MDP> Aha - are you talking about links in emails? That's different. The
MDP> fix only applies to links in HTML pages.

Nope, that's a link on the page!  What I get is the same as a
malformed e-mail link. ;-(

Try it;

http://komp.com/web/feature/home_page.php

FEEDBACK link near top-right.

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those
who don't.

/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
\ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
 XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
/ \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).
--
Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 
Build 2600 Service Pack 1'
--



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,

On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 03:31:17GMT + (which was
10:31 PM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:

MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?

MDP>>> HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command

MW>> However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no*
MW>> effect on my Win2k system.

MDP> It has exactly the right effect on my Win2k Pro system. It works.

Has absolutely no effect in WIN-XP Home.  Still get only the first
word in the subject line of;

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback
^^^ 
Copies only this ^^ Ignores this

Oh well, next issue!

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

Cannot open file d:\bat\cookies.txt - substitute Oreo - Y/N?

/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
\ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
 XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
/ \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).
--
Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 
Build 2600 Service Pack 1'
--



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:30:39 AM, you wrote:

S>> Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?

MDP> HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command

However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* effect on
my Win2k system. I posted the question earlier to see if anyone else
could confirm or deny this working but got no response, so it's just
down to you and me now. I'd love to have someone else try this and
post the results here so we can tell if there's something weird with
my system. I haven't seen this hack documented anywhere else - where'd
you come across it? (...if that isn't stretching the memory cells too
far...)

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,

On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 16:30:39GMT + (which was
11:30 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:

S>> Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?

MDP> HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command

Does this change require a reboot?  I've had the other changes take
place immediately, such as the 'broken' mailto's with other changes I
made.  Of course I did them singly and changed them back immediately
when they didn't work.  I still get only KOMP on the subject line.

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

Wear short sleeves! Support your right to bare arms!

/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
\ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
 XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
/ \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).
--
Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 
Build 2600 Service Pack 1'
--



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,

On or about Saturday, November 30, 2002 at 09:46:55GMT + (which
was 4:46 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:

MDP> In the definition lies the solution. There is a simple fix to all of
MDP> this that involves neither TB nor the web site author:

MDP> This is process is handled by the defined mailto: handler as
MDP> specified in the registry. All you have to do is to add delimiting
MDP> quotes to the %1 parameter in the definition.

MDP> Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of mailto is
MDP> changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double quotes.

Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?  I've found 12 references
to 'mailto' in the registry and 9 of them have the %1 value.  I've
tried changing EACH of them, one at a time with no effect, other than
it BROKE the mailto function in some cases.

Please be more specific!

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

"He who eats soup with chopsticks will get only noodles and maybe some
chunks of stuff."

/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
\ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
 XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
/ \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).
--
Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 
Build 2600 Service Pack 1'
--



Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Mark Wieder
Thomas-

Monday, December 2, 2002, 7:12:36 AM, you wrote:

TF> Just a silly question: Did you close TB when you doctored the
TF> registry?

Good point. I hadn't (I almost never do). Now I have, in fact I had
that machine off overnight. Brought it up this morning and still no
effect. Has anyone else gotten this to work besides Marck?

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

I tested this with IE 5.00.3315.1000. I would have tried it with
Netscape as well, but I can't remember the javascript hack to get it
to launch an external mail client. Getting the double-quote thing to
work isn't a big priority for me, but it's a good trick to know about
if it works. I'm also always perplexed when something works
differently on two supposedly identical systems...

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

Saturday, November 30, 2002, 5:59:30 PM, you wrote:

MDP> If you are confident with RegEdit, find the "mailto" key in
MDP> HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the default to
MDP> enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to be
MDP> enclosed in double quotes.

No, that's what I was saying. I did that and the effect is still the
same. I also changed all the other instances of mailto in the USER
hierarchies just to make sure and it still works the sameer
doesn't work the same.

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck-

Saturday, November 30, 2002, 1:46:55 AM, you wrote:


MDP> Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of mailto is
MDP> changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double quotes.

Didn't change anything on my systems. I haven't seen this hack before
- can you be more specific about it? Should this move over to tbtech?

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Jonathan-

The quotes *aren't* passed on to TB, it's true. But look at the second
url on the web page - it's formatted correctly with %20 in between the
words instead of spaces. TB does pick up the entire string. It just
doesn't handle the %20s properly.

Try this: right-click on the "hi" url and copy it to the clipboard.
Now create a new shortcut on your desktop and paste it in. It should
show up with a Bat icon. Double-click on the shortcut. There you'll
see the entire message in the subject line.

So TB does handle the mailto: urls in the proper manner sometimes - it
seems that it's just the web-page-to-mail handler that is broken.

Now...right-click on each of the urls on the web page and paste them
into a text editor - you get the entire text between the quotes,
well-formed or not. So, whether it's a good idea or not, the technical
feat of grabbing the whole text of the url from quote to quote isn't
much of a chore.

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Mark Wieder
Bats-

Bringing this back on topic again:

Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote:

NJY> You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one
NJY> correct mailto, and one incorrect if you'd like to test for yourself.

The correctly formed url still is not handled correctly by TB, so I
*do* think this qualifies as a bug. And while I've quoted the RFC as a
defense of TB's handling of malformed urls, if the correctly formed
one can be handled by TB then it's a short hop to handling the other
one, using the quotes as delimiters.

NJY> This is already a rule the IETF follows (see
NJY> http://www.apacheweek.com/issues/01-03-02 ).

Did I miss something? This doesn't seem to address the issue...

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html