Re[3]: AVG plug in

2003-03-03 Thread Lou Yovin
Monday, March 3, 2003, 3:24:01 PM, you wrote:

TC Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com:


TC En relaciĆ³n a lo que Spike en su momento posteĆ³:

TC /\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
TC \ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
TC  XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
TC / \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).

TC With  vampire  you  can  filter  the  html  using  the  simple string:
TC Content-Type: text/html in the filter. :-)






TC 
TC Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
TC http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Yes, with TheBat, you can filter out:
Task Control [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as vampire.

-- 
 Lou

--- __@ 
   -- _-\,_
 --- (_)/ (_)   



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: AVG plug in after re-installing?

2002-11-12 Thread rick
Hello Anne,

Tuesday, November 12, 2002, 7:51:24 PM, you wrote:

A Tuesday, November 12, 2002, 5:08:34 PM, William wrote in message
A mid:302427800.20021112170834;dsl.pipex.com

WM If you are interested, have a look at www.grc.com in general and
WM http://grc.com/smgassembly.htm in particular.

WM All Gibson's software is written in assembler and it flies. It's a huge
WM site, lots to read, especially concerning security. He is *very*
WM outspoken and I think you either love him or hate him! There's some good
WM freeware stuff there too.


A Thanks again William - yes we're fans of Steve Gibson also - have been
A since his first Aureate spyware detector came out.  You're right that
A his stiuff is neat and again fast.  It was there that I first read
A about Assembler but it was before he put the page you gave the link
A for up, so I hadn't seen that. I have now and thanks again - it's very
A interesting, and I think we'll been trying some of this very soon! :-)


I think www.grcsucks.com explains my position on the gentlemen in
question. He is a slick marketing person and that is about it. No one
in respected security circles has any respect for him. What a fraud.

-- 
Best regards,
 rick



Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: AVG plug in after re-installing?

2002-11-11 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Monday, November 11, 2002
9:37:21 PM
RE: AVG plug in after re-installing?

Greetings rick,

On Saturday, November 9, 2002, 1:37:44 PM, you wrote:

r If you read the url I posted to thomas,
r http://www.virusbtn.com/magazine/archives/pdf/2002/200206.pdf on page
r 19 (pdf document) virus bulletin review explains clearly why they used
r a older version of grisoft for the tests. There appeared to be
r technical difficulties with grisoft. The AVG product caused blue
r screens, and failed to update properly.

H. Been using AVG Pro in conjunction with Fprot Antivirus for a
long time. I would question the results of these claims of failure, on
the behalf of Grisoft, based simply on the fact that the testers were
unable to run the current version of the AV without BSoD's (haven't run
into that on ANY of the workstations here running Win95 through WinXP
and there are 200+) which inclines me to believe that the testing
company is having some serious problems with their OS's.

As a network engineer and lead IS/IT I can say that no AV solution is
100% however Grisoft's AVG has yet to show any type of failure rate
that is claimed above.

Thanks.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP for Business Security 6.0

iQA/AwUBPdBsm2GmTEg4iItaEQLZHwCdGdIO2YMz5DBSAEsiKnYqGvtx/AYAnRKH
RYQIb1/YKXrw7tRwircNNG9V
=yw7s
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: AVG plug in after re-installing?

2002-11-10 Thread Anne
Sunday, November 10, 2002, 4:24:52 PM, Spike wrote in message
mid:187358835327.20021110112452;candw.ky

S I run The Bat! e-mail client so that I don't HAVE to run ANY
S anti-virus BS. 


Er that's OK insofar as TB! and e-mail goes Spike, but to say that
an AV is unnecessary because one runs TB! is overlooking the fact that
virus can be introduced to a system in other ways as well - e.g. via
floppy disks, CD-Rom etc, and via downloaded software - so unless you
don't introduce any other software to your system it's always at risk
of infection - even with the security settings in the browser set to
optimum.

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10 Build    A 

The Bat Email - Unofficial Support Forum:
http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com 



Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[3]: AVG plug in after re-installing?

2002-11-09 Thread Anne
Saturday, November 9, 2002, 6:28:56 PM, rick wrote in message
mid:131295789272.20021109132856;adelphia.net

r Nod32 not only detects all in-the-wild viruses but it does it fast.
r Nod32 scanned 260 gigs in 15 minutes!!


Just to add to this - as a Kaspersky user which my online-gaming
teenage son refuses to use as it slows his PC down too much putting
him at a disadvantage in many games, he says.  He is evaluating Nod32
at the moment, is incredibly impressed with both the speed and the
lack of hogging resources.  He has a reasonably fast system - Duron
1.3 - and for most things speed wouldn't be a problem - just in games.
Nod32 is the *only* AV I've ever managed to get him to leave on and
updated all of the time - so it gets my vote for that if nothing else!
;-)

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10 Build    A 

The Bat Email - Unofficial Support Forum:
http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com 



Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html