Broken dependencies with Fedora 13 + updates-testing - 2010-09-09

2010-09-09 Thread Michael Schwendt
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==

Broken packages (by src.rpm name):

389-adminutil
almanah
conexus
evolution-data-server
gcc (ignored, releng #4084)
intellij-idea
mozc
mozldap
mumble
pathfinder
perl(ignored, multiarch breakage)
svrcore
syncevolution
xmlsec1




==
Broken packages in fedora-13-i386:

conexus-nss-devel-0.9.1-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-10.fc13.i686  requires  jna-examples
libpathfinder-nss-devel-1.1.3-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 
0:2.0.0
mozldap-devel-6.0.5-6.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
svrcore-devel-4.0.4-5.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.12.3.99.3
xmlsec1-nss-devel-1.2.12-2.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:1.4


==
Broken packages in fedora-13-x86_64:

4:perl-5.10.1-112.fc13.i686  requires  perl-libs = 4:5.10.1-112.fc13
conexus-nss-devel-0.9.1-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
conexus-nss-devel-0.9.1-1.fc13.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
gcc-gfortran-4.4.4-2.fc13.i686  requires  gcc = 0:4.4.4-2.fc13
gcc-gfortran-4.4.4-2.fc13.i686  requires  libgfortran = 0:4.4.4-2.fc13
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-10.fc13.x86_64  requires  jna-examples
libpathfinder-nss-devel-1.1.3-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 
0:2.0.0
libpathfinder-nss-devel-1.1.3-1.fc13.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 
0:2.0.0
mozldap-devel-6.0.5-6.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
mozldap-devel-6.0.5-6.fc12.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.11
svrcore-devel-4.0.4-5.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.12.3.99.3
svrcore-devel-4.0.4-5.fc12.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:3.12.3.99.3
syncevolution-0.9.2+1.0alpha1-1.fc13.i686  requires  
libedataserver-1.2.so.11
xmlsec1-nss-devel-1.2.12-2.fc12.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:1.4
xmlsec1-nss-devel-1.2.12-2.fc12.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss) = 0:1.4


==
Broken packages in fedora-updates-13-i386:

evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss)


==
Broken packages in fedora-updates-13-x86_64:

4:perl-libs-5.10.1-116.fc13.i686  requires  perl = 4:5.10.1-116.fc13
evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss)
evolution-data-server-devel-2.30.3-1.fc13.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss)


==
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-13-i386:

389-adminutil-devel-1.1.10-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss)
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc13.i686  requires  libedataserver-1.2.so.11
ibus-mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.i686  requires  libprotobuf.so.4
mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.i686  requires  libprotobuf.so.4
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc13.i686  requires  libprotobuf.so.4
murmur-1.2.2-10.fc13.i686  requires  libprotobuf.so.4
scim-mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.i686  requires  libprotobuf.so.4


==
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-13-x86_64:

389-adminutil-devel-1.1.10-1.fc13.i686  requires  pkgconfig(nss)
389-adminutil-devel-1.1.10-1.fc13.x86_64  requires  pkgconfig(nss)
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc13.x86_64  requires  libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
ibus-mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.x86_64  requires  
libprotobuf.so.4()(64bit)
mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.x86_64  requires  
libprotobuf.so.4()(64bit)
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc13.x86_64  requires  libprotobuf.so.4()(64bit)
murmur-1.2.2-10.fc13.x86_64  requires  libprotobuf.so.4()(64bit)
scim-mozc-0.12.434.102-0.2.20100823svn.fc13.x86_64  requires  
libprotobuf.so.4()(64bit)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs. / Every OS sucks!

2010-09-09 Thread John Morris
 
  So now I lost the only kernel package where everything worked.  And of
  course Fedora doesn't have it anymore.  You can pick the original
  package or the current update.  Triple crap!   If anyone has a pointer
  to kernel-2.6.31.12-174.222.x86_64.rpm I'd really appreciate it!
  Google, rpmfind, etc. all come up blank as did manually poking around
  on the Fedora mirrors.
 
 You mean this one:
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=157491

Thanks!  Was really hoping those old updates were still somewhere out
there.  Really hate self inflicted wounds, nice to know it wasn't
terminal.  Especially since someone else just joined my bug with the bad
news that F13 does have the same problem.  Looks like I'm going to be
stuck with F12 and that one working kernel for a while yet.  Not sure
what the plan is when the next major security problem pops after F12
goes unsupported but there is still a couple of months until that
problem becomes acute.

 I hoped venting helped you, but this is not the way to move
 things forward. I'd suggest more help testing, good bug reports..

Dunno, reported this one in March and it is still in NEW state.  

Reported #563417 in Feb and it is also in the NEW state.  Thankfully I
could work around it by binding a script to CTRL-F7 to fire blindly that
looks at the state of the dock and manually launches some xrandr
commands to force things into shape.  The panel picks up on dynamic
changes in screen geometry just fine so force it down to 1024x768, wait
a second or two for it to reappear then resize to the current attached
primary panel's size.

Not ready for Grandma but that one doesn't bother me as much as some of
the things I was ranting about because it is a bug in something that is
clearly a new feature.  The agility of xrandr has been amazing to watch
over the last few years.  Hopefully all the other bits like the panel
will catch up in another rev or two.  And maybe the system will even get
smart enough to remember where you put the displays and restore that
when the same external monitor is reattached.

Closer to my original rant is the snarky observation that the Gnomes
probably won't ever get around to fixing such a minor problem because
they are too busy ripping and replacing the whole desktop with an
entirely new set of bugs to care about fixing the few bugs in the
current code that is set to get tossed out anyway.

The problem I was ranting about is more about a growing fear of
upgrading, or heck, even taking patches for fear the bug being fixed
(which most of the time isn't actually biting ya) or feature improvement
(which you probably don't need) will also break your system.  What if a
critical mass of users decide that once they manage to get their system
working that the only safe course of action is to then disable all
updates.  If a bug does start biting hard check to see if that one
package can be updated without dragging in lot of deps, otherwise stay
put until hardware replacement time.  Where does that leave things?  If
normal users stop taking even the updates how does wide scale testing
happen?  I have 'beater' machines, I have QEMU, etc.  You probably have
similar.  Most people don't.  This isn't just a thought experiment;
Microsoft already faced the same problem and got around it by making
Windows Update (all but) mandatory.  How many people are still on XP?
How many IE6 hits are in your server logs?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #118: OpenSCAP test day proposal

2010-09-09 Thread Fedora QA
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
---+
  Reporter:  pvrabec   |   Owner:  kparal   
  Type:  task  |  Status:  closed   
  Priority:  major |   Milestone:  Fedora 14
 Component:  Test Day  | Version:   
Resolution:  fixed |Keywords:   
---+
Changes (by kparal):

  * status:  assigned = closed
  * resolution:  = fixed

Comment:

 This test day has finished. Summary here:
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-
 announce/2010-August/000117.html

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/118#comment:8
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #126: Proposed Test Day - openldap with Mozilla NSS for crypto

2010-09-09 Thread Fedora QA
#126: Proposed Test Day - openldap with Mozilla NSS for crypto
---+
  Reporter:  rmeggins  |   Owner:  kparal
  Type:  task  |  Status:  new   
  Priority:  critical  |   Milestone:
 Component:  Test Day  | Version:
Resolution:|Keywords:
---+
Changes (by kparal):

 * cc: jlaska (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/126#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


task#31 - Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan #1 - recap

2010-09-09 Thread Mingtao Niu



Greetings folks,

Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta
acceptance test run of Fedora 14 (see task#31 [1]).  Thanks for
your attention.  The rawhide acceptance test plan [2] was executed
using AutoQA.  Results are summarized below.

For detail information, you can get the test results at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Pre-Beta_Acceptance_Test_1

The following bugs were encountered:

* RHBZ *628241 - post reboot installation steps not working

Thanks,
Newgle

[1]http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html
[2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan

--
Newgle
FAS Name: newgle1
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-10-62608125
IRC nick: Newgle (#fedora-qa,#fedora-zh)

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide report: 20100909 changes

2010-09-09 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Sep  9 08:15:29 UTC 2010

Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-5.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0)  
0:1.3.0
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0)  
0:1.3.0
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.5-1.fc14.i686 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) = 0:0.10.2
clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) = 0:0.10.2
cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
emerillon-0.1.2-7.fc14.x86_64 requires librest-0.6.so.0()(64bit)
emerillon-0.1.2-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
evolution-sharp-0.21.1-9.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit)
firstaidkit-plugin-openscap-0.2.15-2.fc15.noarch requires 
openscap-python = 0:0.6.3
frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10
frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.i686 requires libmozjs.so
gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
1:gnome-bluetooth-2.90.0-5.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-control-center.so.1()(64bit)
1:gnome-games-extra-2.31.91.1-1.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-media-2.31.5-5.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-control-center.so.1()(64bit)
gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libbrasero-media.so.1()(64bit)
gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libbrasero-burn.so.1()(64bit)
gnome-python2-evolution-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit)
gnome-python2-totem-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-shell-2.31.5-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit)
gxine-0.5.905-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
hornsey-1.5.2-0.3.fc15.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples
libchamplain-gtk-0.6.1-4.fc14.i686 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0
libchamplain-gtk-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
libchamplain-gtk-devel-0.6.1-4.fc14.i686 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10)
libchamplain-gtk-devel-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10)
libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
matahari-0.0.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libqmf.so.1()(64bit)
meego-panel-devices-0.2.4-2.fc15.x86_64 requires 

F-14 Branched report: 20100909 changes

2010-09-09 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Sep  9 13:15:29 UTC 2010

Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.4.so()(64bit)
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit)
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(Net::Telnet::Cisco)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit)
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
evolution-sharp-0.21.1-9.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit)
fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10
frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
gnome-python2-evolution-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit)
gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit)
intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples
libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libpst-python-0.6.47-4.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_python.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit)
matahari-0.0.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libqmf.so.1()(64bit)
mine_detector-6.0-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit)
mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires 
mingw32(libpng-3.dll)
nautilus-sound-converter-1.0.5-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-media-profiles-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-javascript-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-javascript-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-nodes-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-nodes-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
openvrml-xembed-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 

New BugZapper Introduction

2010-09-09 Thread Martin Airs
Good day all,

I have just applied to join the BugZappers Team, I have used Fedora since FC1 
and other distros before that.

I signed up on the Fedora Account System and applied for the Fedora-UK group 
first of all, with the intention of speaking to some people in that group to 
get a feel for what goes on and how I can help.

In the #fedora-uk irc room someone suggested that bug triage needs help so I 
thought I have to start somewere.

My name is Martin Airs and I live in Wallingford Oxfordshire, I am currently 
unemployed with plenty of spare time to contribute.
I enjoy python programming and creating PyQt Gui's, I can also program perl.
I have setup and maintained a couple of dedicated servers and VPS's from 
scratch, installing apache, mysql, postfix..etc

I am also head fault finder and brains for a small group of my friends who also 
run fedora :)

I should also mention that I am looking for a mentor just to show me the ropes 
and I am a fast learner, just take me through triaging 1 or 2 bugs and I'm 
sure I'll be able to continue on my own.

Thanks for reading, and I look forward to contributing to the FedoraProject in 
anyway I can, I would eventually like to help out in the KDE Sig, but I'll 
start here and see were I get to.

Martin

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Which bugzilla component?

2010-09-09 Thread John Poelstra
Richard Hughes said the following on 09/08/2010 12:13 PM Pacific Time:
 On 8 September 2010 18:07, John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com  wrote:
   * Cancelling.. The transaction failed: internal-error, The backend
 exited unexpectedly. This is a serious error as the spawned backend did
 not complete the pending transaction.

 This is bad, both from a your system perspective, and from a
 PackageKit reporting errors to the user perspective. File a bug
 against PackageKit-command-not-found and we can debug there.

 Richard.

I can't reproduce this any more.  Still worth reporting?

John
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:45:59 +0200
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:

 2010/9/9 Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com:
  On 09/07/2010 02:41 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I want to compare systemd and upstart boot speed (I don't expect
  much, so I won't be disappointed :))
 
  systemd
  http://i56.tinypic.com/ilk4fq.jpg
 
  upstart
  http://i53.tinypic.com/dnhrvm.png
 
  both starts system in 31 seconds, but systemd starts much more
  services.
 
  err.. be sure to turn off readahead, or restart and measure again,
  if the readahead-collector was running and slowing down the
  system!!!
 
 I disabled readahead and there is no difference.

readahead doesn't run with systemd. 

It's got upstart specific startup files, so systemd doesn't see it at
all. It would be nice to fix this. ;) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: task#31 - Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan #1 - recap

2010-09-09 Thread James Laska
Thanks for the test update Newgle!  

On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:51 +0800, Mingtao Niu wrote:
 
 Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta
 acceptance test run of Fedora 14 (see task#31 [1]).  Thanks for
 your attention.  The rawhide acceptance test plan [2] was executed
 using AutoQA.  Results are summarized below.
 
 For detail information, you can get the test results at
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Pre-Beta_Acceptance_Test_1
 
 The following bugs were encountered:
 
 * RHBZ *628241 - post reboot installation steps not working

I've added karma feedback to the anaconda bodhi update based on your
test results [1].  There was one other Beta blocking issue discovered
during the systemd test day which we may want to include.  My
understanding is that bug#627401 is also unresolved in anaconda-14.17-1
and requires manual intervention to properly boot.

I confirmed with AdamW that this is an issue we'd want resolve prior to
the Beta 'test compose'.  Both anaconda-devel (dlehman) and release
engineering (jkeating) are in the loop and planning the to do a new
anaconda-14.18-1 build along with a beta test compose.

Thanks all!
James

 [1]http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html
 [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan

Thanks,
James

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-14.17-1.fc14


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs. / Every OS sucks!

2010-09-09 Thread John Morris
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 00:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 23:18:00 -0500,
   John Morris jmor...@beau.org wrote:
  
  And of course Network-Manager isn't optional anymore.  Oh no, you can't
 
 You can still run the network service. You use chkconfig to turn it on.
 If you don't need wireless, turning off NetworkManager doesn't seem to
 be a problem, but it's also possible to run both at the same time.

No it isn't.  If NM isn't managing a connection to the Internet then
Firefox (fixable), Evolution, Empathy and almost certainly other apps go
into offline mode.  You can still run a server without NetworkManager
but a desktop install now requires that it be installed and managing
your connection.  Been there, tried that and have the t-shirt.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs. / Every OS sucks!

2010-09-09 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:23:12PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 00:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
  On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 23:18:00 -0500,
John Morris jmor...@beau.org wrote:
   
   And of course Network-Manager isn't optional anymore.  Oh no, you can't
  
  You can still run the network service. You use chkconfig to turn it on.
  If you don't need wireless, turning off NetworkManager doesn't seem to
  be a problem, but it's also possible to run both at the same time.
 
 No it isn't.  If NM isn't managing a connection to the Internet then
 Firefox (fixable), Evolution, Empathy and almost certainly other apps go
 into offline mode.

Really?  I do not know about Evolution or Empathy and surely not
about almost certainly other app but this is from two different
F13 installations:

# chkconfig --list NetworkManager
NetworkManager  0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off

Both are running desktop and firefox did not require any fixes not to
go into offline mode as long as network was active.  Nor I have seen
so far any other problems.

It may help if you will make desired network interfaces explicitely not
NM controlled as by default they are.

   Michal
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] 2010-09-07 systemd Test Day recap

2010-09-09 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:48:41 +0100
Adam Williamson wrote:

 As you can see, we've already made a start on triaging and fixing the
 bugs. FESCo is also discussing the final decision on whether to go ahead
 with systemd for Fedora 14 in a trac ticket:

Shucks, you've released other fedora versions with stuff busted
much worse than systemd - I say go for it (especially if it
eventually leads to those rumored under 10 second boot times :-).
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] 2010-09-07 systemd Test Day recap

2010-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/10 Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com:
 On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:48:41 +0100
 Adam Williamson wrote:

 As you can see, we've already made a start on triaging and fixing the
 bugs. FESCo is also discussing the final decision on whether to go ahead
 with systemd for Fedora 14 in a trac ticket:

 Shucks, you've released other fedora versions with stuff busted
 much worse than systemd - I say go for it (especially if it
 eventually leads to those rumored under 10 second boot times :-).

Ouh?

Probably only for SSD users.

(Frankly I doubt it, because in my gdm starts in 5 seconds 8). Do not
expect too much, you will not be disappointed)

Regards,
Michal
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] 2010-09-07 systemd Test Day recap

2010-09-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 19:08 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
 On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:48:41 +0100
 Adam Williamson wrote:
 
  As you can see, we've already made a start on triaging and fixing the
  bugs. FESCo is also discussing the final decision on whether to go ahead
  with systemd for Fedora 14 in a trac ticket:
 
 Shucks, you've released other fedora versions with stuff busted
 much worse than systemd - I say go for it (especially if it
 eventually leads to those rumored under 10 second boot times :-).

That would be F15 timeframe.

(Although if you have a system with fast dual SSDs in a RAID-0
configuration it already boots in about 17. I can't *imagine* how it is
I know that. ;)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta TC1 Available Now!

2010-09-09 Thread Andre Robatino
Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1].  Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.

Installation:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

Desktop:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test

Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for installation [2] and
desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [4].
 Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test
list [6].

[1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria
[5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)

2010-09-09 Thread John Poelstra
When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net

Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release 
Candidate on 2010-09-16.

We'll be discussing these bugs to determine if they meet the criteria, 
should stay on the list, and are getting the attention they need:

629719 :: NEW :: anaconda :: Anaconda Maintenance Team :: 
FormatCreateError: ('invalid device specification', '/dev/md127p3') :: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719

628239 :: NEW :: anaconda :: Anaconda Maintenance Team :: Fedora 14 
Alpha reduced graphics creates vesa-using xorg.conf but doesn't 
blacklist nouveau :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239

608992 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: Add Boot system with 
basic video driver option at the initial screen :: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992

630781 :: NEW :: systemd :: Kernel Maintainer List :: systemd hangs on 
Clocksource tsc unstable error and causes the system to freeze after 
cpu-scaling detection :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781

630490 :: NEW :: systemd :: Lennart Poettering :: disabled units still 
get bus activated :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490

631620 :: NEW :: systemd :: Lennart Poettering :: ordering cycles exist 
(+ breaking them deletes wrong services) :: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620

621027 :: NEW :: fedora-logos :: Tom spot Callaway :: Graphical screen 
in anaconda shows F-13 :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027

If you are the owner of any of these bugs, kindly update the comments 
with your feedback as to whether you believe it is a blocker and what 
your plans for fixing the bug are.

Do you have an issue you believe should be fixed before the Fedora 14 
Beta ships?  Please consider the following criteria when escalating an 
issue: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria

John

The command used to generate the list of bugs above is:
$ bugzilla query --blocked=611991 \
 
--bug_status=NEW,ASSIGNED,NEEDINFO,ON_DEV,MODIFIED,POST,ON_QA,FAILS_QA,PASSES_QA,REOPENED,VERIFIED,RELEASE_PENDING
 
\
 --outputformat=%{bug_id} :: %{bug_status} :: %{component} :: 
%{assigned_to} :: %{summary} :: %{url}

NOTE: It this command doesn't work on Fedora 14.
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)

2010-09-09 Thread Tom Horsley
This one seemed pretty bad to me:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073

Maybe the ATI problem is fixed now (it sort of seemed like
it might already have been fixed but didn't quite make it
into F14 alpha), but vesa also not working was pretty mysterious.

I'd certainly hope this one is fixed as well:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058

Hard disk install is the simplest way for me to install,
and it was a pain that it didn't work.

And this one doesn't seem to actually hurt anything,
but it is always worrisome to get kernel errors :-)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626026

(I'm still seeing the same error in the latest kernel
provided in the f14 repos).
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-09-09 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing

Django-1.2.2-1.fc13
RackTables-0.18.4-1.fc13
avr-gcc-4.5.1-1.fc13
gwibber-2.31.93-1.847bzr.fc13
ibus-input-pad-0.1.3-1.fc13
im-chooser-1.3.2-1.fc13
monafont-2.90-11.fc13
nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13
nss-3.12.7-4.fc13
nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13
nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13
ntfs-3g-2010.8.8-2.fc13
perl-File-FnMatch-0.02-6.fc13
perl-Math-Base36-0.07-2.fc13
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.10-1.fc13
policycoreutils-2.0.83-25.fc13
preupgrade-1.1.8-1.fc13
python-xlib-0.15-0.3.rc1.fc13
python3-3.1.2-8.fc13
rakudo-star-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-6.fc13
rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13
rubygem-gherkin-2.2.0-1.fc13
rubygem-right_aws-2.0.0-1.fc13
rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.4-0.2.rc1.fc13
rubygem-ruby-debug-base-0.10.4-0.1.rc1.fc13
webkitgtk-1.2.4-1.fc13

Details about builds:



 Django-1.2.2-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-14398)
 A high-level Python Web framework

Update Information:

See http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2010/sep/08/security-release/

ChangeLog:

* Thu Sep  9 2010 Steve 'Ashcrow' Milner m...@stevemilner.org - 1.2.2-1
- Update for CVE-2010-3082 (see 
http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2010/sep/08/security-release/)
- Removed Django-hash-compat-13310.patch as it is already included in this 
release
* Wed Jul 21 2010 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com - 1.2.1-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7/MassRebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #632239 - CVE-2010-3082 Django CSRF flaw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632239




 RackTables-0.18.4-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-14406)
 A datacenter asset management system

Update Information:

Rebase to v0.18.4

ChangeLog:

* Wed Aug 25 2010 colin@gmail.com - 0.18.4-1
- Make syncdomain use /usr/bin/php
- Rebase to v0.18.4
* Mon Jul  5 2010 colin@gmail.com - 0.18.3-1
- Rebase to v0.18.3




 avr-gcc-4.5.1-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-14431)
 Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr

Update Information:

Updated to 4.5.1

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug  3 2010 Thibault North tno...@fedoraproject.org - 4.5.1-1
- Updated to 4.5.1




 gwibber-2.31.93-1.847bzr.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-14424)
 An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK

Update Information:

Fix notifications in gwibber, and also, in any apps that use notify-python.
Fixes crashes related to sender being undefined, aggressive threading, too
many notifications at once, disable tr.im shortening.Update to 2.31.91, add
support for Twitter Oauth (you will need to add the Twitter account again).
Fixes crashes related to sender being undefined, aggressive threading, too
many notifications at once, disable tr.im shortening.Update to 2.31.91, add
support for Twitter Oauth (you will need to add the Twitter account again).

ChangeLog:

* Thu Sep  9 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.92-1.847bzr
- update to 2.31.93 (847bzr)
* Fri Sep  3 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.92-1.838bzr
- update to 2.31.92 (838bzr)
* Tue Aug 31 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.91-1.832bzr
- update to 2.31.91 (832bzr)
- move twitter to oauth
* Fri Aug 27 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.90-5
- add Requires: gnome-python2-gtkspell for spell checking support
- update to bzr 830
* Thu Aug 26 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.90-4
- fix threads gone wild problem (bz627686), thanks to Bill Nottingham
* Thu Aug 26 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.90-3
- update to bzr 825
* Tue Aug 24 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1:2.31.90-2
- update to bzr 823
* Mon Aug 23 2010 Tom spot Callaway 

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta TC1 Available Now!

2010-09-09 Thread Andre Robatino
Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1].  Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.

Installation:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

Desktop:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test

Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for installation [2] and
desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [4].
 Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test
list [6].

[1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria
[5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce