Re: F22 RC3 no rpmfusion
On Qua, 2015-03-11 at 10:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: Usually they don't branch in the same way as Fedora. They point their rawhide repos at Fedora Branched and ignore Fedora Rawhide for some months. Last they did that on 09-Dec-2014: $ md5sum rpmfusion-free-release-* b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696 rpmfusion-free-release-branched.noarch.rpm b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696 rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm Odd is that all of the packages still have a .fc21 dist tag, which means there has not been any rebuild for Rawhide either getting a .fc22 dist tag before Fedora Rawhide switched to .fc23. Apart that we should move this discussion to rpmfusion mailing list , you got a point: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/ stops totally on 13-Dec-2014, so we don't have any package for F22 and neither for rawhide , last updates of rpmfusion are in updates/testing/21/, updates/21/ and releases/21/Everything/. So for F22 I mean in /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion-free.repo, rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo You should change $releasever with 21. And you will find, already, some packages need a rebuild ... BTW I'm building a koji server to make local builds of rpmfusion packages, so this notes clarify what buildroot we should use ... :) when finish (no ETA) I will announce on rpmfusion mailing lists , of course . -- Sérgio M. B. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:03 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: These point to Alpha RC3 files. Once again: stale caches. Refresh the page. We've never once (IIRC) sent out an announce before creating the pages. Before relval, sometimes we'd forget to update the Current redirects, but relval does it automatically. It's very, very unlikely that one of these mails will ever go out again with the Current pages *actually* pointing to the wrong place. 99% of the time, it is going to be the cache issue. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:37:57 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: On 03/11/2015 11:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:03 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: These point to Alpha RC3 files. Once again: stale caches. Refresh the page. We've never once (IIRC) sent out an announce before creating the pages. Before relval, sometimes we'd forget to update the Current redirects, but relval does it automatically. It's very, very unlikely that one of these mails will ever go out again with the Current pages *actually* pointing to the wrong place. 99% of the time, it is going to be the cache issue. Just now I refreshed several times. Still points to alpha. Can you provide: wget -S output for any of these pages you are seeing RC3 still on? kevin pgpagq0zB661I.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 03/11/2015 11:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:03 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: These point to Alpha RC3 files. Once again: stale caches. Refresh the page. We've never once (IIRC) sent out an announce before creating the pages. Before relval, sometimes we'd forget to update the Current redirects, but relval does it automatically. It's very, very unlikely that one of these mails will ever go out again with the Current pages *actually* pointing to the wrong place. 99% of the time, it is going to be the cache issue. Just now I refreshed several times. Still points to alpha. Perhaps a pointer to the real files would be more useful. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 03/11/2015 06:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: A bit ahead of the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. This wasn't scheduled till next week, but releng needed to test some changes to the compose process and figured they may as well do it by running a TC1 compose - so it's up for testing if anyone wants to do it. It'd be great to get results in early for all the Beta and Final validation tests. This compose has no specially-requested packages, it'll be very similar to the 03-10 or 03-11 (not sure which) nightly. As this wasn't formally requested by QA, there isn't a trac ticket yet. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. For the Fedora 22 cycle we are also trying to run the Beta and Final tests at this time, to try and identify later release blocker bugs as early as possible. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-22/f-22-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test These point to Alpha RC3 files. A netinst install of Dev+Cre+MATE started nominally. When I came back a couple of hours later the machine had locked up. After a hardware reset Fedora booted normally but locked upinstead of presenting a login screen. Intel 3770K, ASUSp8z77-v le plus, Nvidia GTX970 -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 03/11/2015 12:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:37:57 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: On 03/11/2015 11:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:03 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: These point to Alpha RC3 files. Once again: stale caches. Refresh the page. We've never once (IIRC) sent out an announce before creating the pages. Before relval, sometimes we'd forget to update the Current redirects, but relval does it automatically. It's very, very unlikely that one of these mails will ever go out again with the Current pages *actually* pointing to the wrong place. 99% of the time, it is going to be the cache issue. Just now I refreshed several times. Still points to alpha. Can you provide: wget -S output for any of these pages you are seeing RC3 still on? kevin [caf@omen tmp]$ wget -S https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test --2015-03-11 12:12:51-- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Resolving fedoraproject.org (fedoraproject.org)... 2607:f188::dead:beef:cafe:fed1, 2610:28:3090:3001:dead:beef:cafe:fed3, 2001:4178:2:1269::fed2, ... Connecting to fedoraproject.org (fedoraproject.org)|2607:f188::dead:beef:cafe:fed1|:443... -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Screensaver in KDE/Plasma 5
- Original Message - I am running what I think is an updated F22 system, and as far as I can tell, I have screen saver turned off. But if I am away, for not sure how long it takes, my workstation goes to a screen for me to enter my password to get back to my desktop. I don't want that, not any screensavers nor anything. I want it to always stay on. I also went through power management to make sure it was off there as well. I did all the normal things I would do when had previous versions, Fedora 21 and below, and they never did this once I configured it. What am I missing? It's not screensaver and it's not connected to power management but security. What you see is screen lock. You can change it in system settings, go to Desktop Behavior, then Screen Locking and set Lock Screen After to Never (just click spin button down button several times). For KDE related issues, k...@lists.fedoraproject.org is better list. Jaroslav -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Best little town on Earth! -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22 RC3 no rpmfusion
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:32:05 +, James Hogarth wrote: It is a package you need to download from http://www.rpmfusion.org Look for target rawhide in the list. -- Unfortunately that won't work for the moment as they still have not branched for the last ... If you look at the dist tag you can see rawhide is still being built against twenty-one there... Usually they don't branch in the same way as Fedora. They point their rawhide repos at Fedora Branched and ignore Fedora Rawhide for some months. Last they did that on 09-Dec-2014: $ md5sum rpmfusion-free-release-* b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696 rpmfusion-free-release-branched.noarch.rpm b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696 rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm Odd is that all of the packages still have a .fc21 dist tag, which means there has not been any rebuild for Rawhide either getting a .fc22 dist tag before Fedora Rawhide switched to .fc23. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
A bit ahead of the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. This wasn't scheduled till next week, but releng needed to test some changes to the compose process and figured they may as well do it by running a TC1 compose - so it's up for testing if anyone wants to do it. It'd be great to get results in early for all the Beta and Final validation tests. This compose has no specially-requested packages, it'll be very similar to the 03-10 or 03-11 (not sure which) nightly. As this wasn't formally requested by QA, there isn't a trac ticket yet. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. For the Fedora 22 cycle we are also trying to run the Beta and Final tests at this time, to try and identify later release blocker bugs as early as possible. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-22/f-22-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
A bit ahead of the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. This wasn't scheduled till next week, but releng needed to test some changes to the compose process and figured they may as well do it by running a TC1 compose - so it's up for testing if anyone wants to do it. It'd be great to get results in early for all the Beta and Final validation tests. This compose has no specially-requested packages, it'll be very similar to the 03-10 or 03-11 (not sure which) nightly. As this wasn't formally requested by QA, there isn't a trac ticket yet. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. For the Fedora 22 cycle we are also trying to run the Beta and Final tests at this time, to try and identify later release blocker bugs as early as possible. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-22/f-22-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 19 update testing
Greetings! Are we to continue doing update testing on F19? I have been having a lot of problems with my F19 image(s) recently, and I’m really wanting to focus on F20, F21 Desktop, and F21 Server. Besides, I can’t find a recent F19 report. Besides, I attempted to run updates against my newest F19 image yesterday, and there were none to install. I’m sure the Fedora Project officially still supports F19, but I’m not sure if we are still testing updates on it. Thanks! JC -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
Umm, there's no live Workstation image. There's only a netinstall. And http://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/ doesn't have ßTC1 at all. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Work around for EFI system partition corruption
Low priority: I'm tempted to nominate this year old bug as a final blocker under the data corruption provision. And I'm wondering what people think of this. RFE: Do not persistently mount EFI System partition at /boot/efi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077984 A crash/panic or power failure has a high degree of FAT corruption potential. The FAT kernel maintainer says this is more or less expected and that the volume shouldn't be persistently mounted. The RFE contains a ~18 month (or better) tested work around, using mount options 'x-systemd.automount,noauto' to prevent it from being mounted unless needed. At the moment it doesn't autoumount so it can still get corrupted, but this is better than nothing. The bug is an RFE so making it a blocker is, well, it's 50% RFE and 50% data corruption bug, and is an odd duck way of getting it fixed but there's no traction in a year, not even a comment. The problem came up again today on the systemd list where Kay says Right, the Linux FAT driver, or maybe just the way Linux handles the writeback to disk, is absolutely fragile. Corrupted FAT file systems are the norm and not the exception. We must mount it unconditionally, it will just break after a while. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-March/029334.html Hence my desire to escalate. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Work around for EFI system partition corruption
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 21:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Low priority: I'm tempted to nominate this year old bug as a final blocker under the data corruption provision. And I'm wondering what people think of this. I would vote -1 on it. The bug is an RFE so making it a blocker is, well, it's 50% RFE and 50% data corruption bug, and is an odd duck way of getting it fixed but there's no traction in a year, not even a comment. The release blocker system is for correctly identifying *release blocker* bugs, it's not a generic 'flag for attention' system. That was what we had before with the FXXTarget bugs, but no-one ever really paid much attention to them. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 19 update testing
Thanks! Now I can finally delete that pesky image! JC On Mar 11, 2015, at 10:31 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Calloway jonathancallo...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings! Are we to continue doing update testing on F19? I have been having a lot of problems with my F19 image(s) recently, and I’m really wanting to focus on F20, F21 Desktop, and F21 Server. Besides, I can’t find a recent F19 report. Besides, I attempted to run updates against my newest F19 image yesterday, and there were none to install. I’m sure the Fedora Project officially still supports F19, but I’m not sure if we are still testing updates on it. Nope, it's EOL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life Definitely proceed focusing on F20+. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22 RC3 no rpmfusion
On Mar 10, 2015 6:46 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:52:52 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi, while I was trying to install VLC player on F22 RC3 I recognized, that I have on a new install of F22 RC3 no package rpmfusion, I have had this package in F21 and the prior Fedora versions. Will it come with F22 Beta or later? Or have I to download and install this package? Yes to the latter. [root@linux joerg]# dnf search rpmfusion Using metadata from Tue Mar 10 14:26:07 2015 Fehler: Keine Übereinstimmungen gefunden. It is a package you need to download from http://www.rpmfusion.org Look for target rawhide in the list. -- Unfortunately that won't work for the moment as they still have not branched for the last ... If you look at the dist tag you can see rawhide is still being built against twenty-one there... VLC is even more of a special case as it's failing to build with gcc5... But that has nothing to do with fedora. There is no ETA on the branch or changing the target of rawhide at this time if you look at their mailing lists. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Work around for EFI system partition corruption
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 21:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Low priority: I'm tempted to nominate this year old bug as a final blocker under the data corruption provision. And I'm wondering what people think of this. I would vote -1 on it. The bug is an RFE so making it a blocker is, well, it's 50% RFE and 50% data corruption bug, and is an odd duck way of getting it fixed but there's no traction in a year, not even a comment. The release blocker system is for correctly identifying *release blocker* bugs, it's not a generic 'flag for attention' system. Which is why I originally filed it as an RFE. But since then it's become much more clearly a consistent corruption problem and as such is sliding more toward design flaw then feature request. I mean, no one ever says hey feature request, let's not corrupt bootloader partitions. That was what we had before with the FXXTarget bugs, but no-one ever really paid much attention to them. Well the out in the data corruption criteria is document it, so even if it doesn't get fixed there's more awareness... -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 21:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Umm, there's no live Workstation image. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC1_Installation#Image_sanity There's only a netinstall. And http://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/doesn't have ßTC1 at all. Big outage today, could be affecting mirroring times I guess. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 19 update testing
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Calloway jonathancallo...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings! Are we to continue doing update testing on F19? I have been having a lot of problems with my F19 image(s) recently, and I’m really wanting to focus on F20, F21 Desktop, and F21 Server. Besides, I can’t find a recent F19 report. Besides, I attempted to run updates against my newest F19 image yesterday, and there were none to install. I’m sure the Fedora Project officially still supports F19, but I’m not sure if we are still testing updates on it. Nope, it's EOL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life Definitely proceed focusing on F20+. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
