Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On 06/10/2015 10:51 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >>> kevin martin wrote: >>> >>> ...snip... >>> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package (as discussed about a year ago). >>> >>> This was fixed in >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=638190 >>> >>> (systemd-219-14) >>> >>> It should have been in the rawhide compose, but you can get it from >>> koji if not. >>> >>> (Or just get systemd-220, but it has some selinux issues going on) >>> >>> kevin >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks for the info. >> >> Kevin >> > Tried getting the koji build but there were too many dependency issues to > install it and I'm still not getting a Rawhide version > that can be installed. Still getting: > > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset from install of > fedora-release-23-0.13.noarch conflicts with file from > package systemd-219-13.fc23.x86_64 > > Error Summary > - > > > Regards, > > Kevin > I upgraded fedora-release and can now run an upgrade of my system but it still never gets a systemd upgrade past systemd-219-13. Is that the latest rawhide version? Thanks Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 22 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 63 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22 41 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7329/drupal7-views-3.11-1.fc22 40 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7383/python-keystonemiddleware-1.3.1-1.fc22 27 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8196/rawstudio-2.1-0.1.20150511git983bda1.fc22 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9110/fossil-1.33-1.fc22 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185/ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9431/filezilla-3.11.0.2-1.fc22 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9528/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.3.3-1.fc22 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9456/xen-4.5.0-10.fc22 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9498/redis-2.8.21-1.fc22 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9663/libwmf-0.2.8.4-43.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5279/strongswan-5.3.2-1.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9726/cups-2.0.3-1.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9692/squid-3.4.13-1.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9712/kernel-4.0.5-300.fc22 The following Fedora 22 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9196/sendmail-8.15.1-5.fc22 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9066/lorax-22.12-1.fc22 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9342/perl-Curses-1.32-1.fc22 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9526/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-11.20150603.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9794/systemd-219-18.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9807/libfm-1.2.3-9.D20150607gite1de98ccba.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9754/perl-Encode-Locale-1.05-1.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9721/wpa_supplicant-2.4-2.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9711/sane-backends-1.0.24-14.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9694/livecd-tools-22.2-1.fc22 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 22 updates-testing 389-adminutil-1.1.22-1.fc22 389-ds-base-1.3.3.11-1.fc22 alienarena-7.66-7.fc22 bandit-0.11.0-1.fc22 biber-1.8-10.fc22 cockpit-0.61-1.fc22 docker-1.7.0-4.git5b82e1d.fc22 fparser-4.5.2-1.fc22 ganglia-3.7.1-2.fc22 glassfish-servlet-api-3.1.0-8.fc22 gnome-calculator-3.16.2-1.fc22 golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0.2.1-7.gitf95d189.fc22 golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.9.hgb5adcc2.fc22 hplip-3.15.6-1.fc22 kubernetes-0.18.2-0.3.git0dfb681.fc22 libfm-1.2.3-9.D20150607gite1de98ccba.fc22 libsbw-2.11.1-7.20150414svn579.fc22 mate-icon-theme-1.10.1-1.fc22 mate-sensors-applet-1.10.1-1.fc22 mate-themes-1.10.1-1.fc22 mysql-connector-odbc-5.3.4-3.fc22 nfs-utils-1.3.2-8.fc22 pdns-3.4.5-1.fc22 pdns-recursor-3.7.3-1.fc22 perl-CHI-0.60-1.fc22 perl-Config-AutoConf-0.311-1.fc22 perl-Digest-JHash-0.09-1.fc22 perl-Encode-Locale-1.05-1.fc22 perl-Server-Starter-0.28-1.fc22 php-natxet-cssmin-3.0.3-1.fc22 php-pecl-mongo-1.6.9-1.fc22 python-html2text-2015.6.6-1.fc22 python-ipaddress-1.0.7-3.fc22 python-num2words-0.5.3-1.fc22 querydsl-4.0.0-2.fc22 redis-protocol-0.7-1.fc22 rpcbind-0.2.3-0.1.fc22 rubygem-rb-readline-0.5.3-1.fc22 rubygem-sequel-4.23.0-1.fc22 rubygem-test-unit-3.1.2-100.fc22 spice-xpi-2.8.90-7.fc22 systemd-219-18.fc22 vagrant-registration-0.0.14-1.fc22 wine-mono-4.5.6-4.fc22 Details about builds: 389-adminutil-1.1.22-1.fc22 (FEDORA-2015-9751) Utility library for 389 administration Update Information: bump version to 1.1.22 ChangeLog: * Wed Jun 10 2015 Noriko Hosoi - 1.1.22-1 - bump version to 1.1.22 - Ticket 48152 - [adminutil] support NSS 3.18 389-ds-base-1.3.3.11-1.fc22 (FEDORA-2015-9782) 389 Directory Server (base) Update Information: release 1.3.3.11
Fedora 21 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 131 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 76 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6005/asterisk-11.17.1-1.fc21 41 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7326/drupal7-views-3.11-1.fc21 31 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7878/krb5-1.12.2-17.fc21 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8170/rawstudio-2.1-0.1.20150511git983bda1.fc21 21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8168/cabal-install-1.16.1.0-1.fc21,haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-39.fc21 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9090/fossil-1.33-1.fc21 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9141/ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9466/xen-4.4.2-5.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9504/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.3.3-1.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9503/qpid-cpp-0.32-4.fc21 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9488/redis-2.8.21-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9614/mbedtls-1.3.11-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9599/qemu-2.1.3-8.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9664/python-requests-2.7.0-1.fc21,python-urllib3-1.10.4-3.20150503gita91975b.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9674/libwmf-0.2.8.4-43.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5247/strongswan-5.3.2-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9801/cups-1.7.5-17.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9704/kernel-4.0.5-200.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9744/squid-3.4.13-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9815/389-ds-base-1.3.3.11-1.fc21 The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9164/cdrkit-1.1.11-26.fc21 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9241/highlight-3.22-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9811/grubby-8.40-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9801/cups-1.7.5-17.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9831/libfm-1.2.3-9.D20150607gite1de98ccba.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9710/systemd-216-25.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9716/livecd-tools-21.6-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9570/gnome-software-3.14.5-2.fc21,PackageKit-1.0.6-1.fc21,libhif-0.2.0-3.fc21,libappstream-glib-0.4.0-1.fc21 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 21 updates-testing 389-adminutil-1.1.22-1.fc21 389-ds-base-1.3.3.11-1.fc21 alienarena-7.66-7.fc21 cups-1.7.5-17.fc21 fparser-4.5.2-1.fc21 ganglia-3.7.1-2.fc21 golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0.2.1-7.gitf95d189.fc21 golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.9.hgb5adcc2.fc21 grubby-8.40-1.fc21 kubernetes-0.18.2-0.3.git0dfb681.fc21 libfm-1.2.3-9.D20150607gite1de98ccba.fc21 mate-icon-theme-1.10.1-1.fc21 mate-themes-1.10.1-1.fc21 mysql-connector-odbc-5.3.2-4.fc21 pdns-3.4.5-1.fc21 pdns-recursor-3.7.3-1.fc21 perl-Digest-JHash-0.09-1.fc21 perl-Encode-Locale-1.05-1.fc21 php-natxet-cssmin-3.0.3-1.fc21 php-pecl-mongo-1.6.9-1.fc21 python-html2text-2015.6.6-1.fc21 python-ipaddress-1.0.7-3.fc21 python-num2words-0.5.3-1.fc21 rubygem-rb-readline-0.5.3-1.fc21 rubygem-sequel-4.23.0-1.fc21 rubygem-test-unit-3.1.2-100.fc21 vagrant-registration-0.0.14-1.fc21 Details about builds: 389-adminutil-1.1.22-1.fc21 (FEDORA-2015-9793) Utility library for 389 administration Update Information: bump version to 1.1.22 ChangeLog: * Wed Jun 10 2015 Noriko Hosoi - 1.1.22-1 - bump version to 1.1.22 - Ticket 48152 - [adminutil] support NSS 3.18 389-ds-base-1.3.3.11-1.fc21 (FEDORA-2015-9815) 389 Directory Server (base) Update Information: release 1.3.3.11 ChangeLog: * Wed Jun 10 2015 Noriko Hosoi - 1.3.3.11-1 - release 1.3
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 171 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20 126 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 109 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 94 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3417/389-ds-base-1.3.2.27-1.fc20 90 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3738/ImageMagick-6.8.6.3-6.fc20 76 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4672/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc20 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5970/asterisk-11.17.1-1.fc20 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5978/krb5-1.11.5-20.fc20 54 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6339/realmd-0.14.6-6.fc20 42 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7231/libarchive-3.1.2-8.fc20 41 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7302/drupal7-views-3.11-1.fc20 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8159/rawstudio-2.1-0.1.20150511git983bda1.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8142/cabal-install-1.16.1.0-1.fc20,haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-39.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8727/fail2ban-0.9.2-1.fc20 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9163/fossil-1.33-1.fc20 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9161/nss-util-3.19.1-1.0.fc20,nss-3.19.1-1.0.fc20,nss-softokn-3.19.1-1.0.fc20 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9388/libreswan-3.13-1.fc20 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9371/openssl-1.0.1e-43.fc20 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9527/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.3.3-1.fc20 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9500/xen-4.3.4-5.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9604/python-django14-1.4.20-1.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9625/mbedtls-1.3.11-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9649/libwmf-0.2.8.4-43.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5375/strongswan-5.3.2-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9703/squid-3.3.14-1.fc20 The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 109 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9131/cdrkit-1.1.11-23.fc20 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9379/perl-Getopt-Long-2.46-1.fc20 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9371/openssl-1.0.1e-43.fc20 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9452/gnupg2-2.0.28-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8911/kdelibs-4.14.9-2.fc20,kdepimlibs-4.14.9-1.fc20,kde-runtime-15.04.2-1.fc20,kde-baseapps-15.04.2-1.fc20,oxygen-icon-theme-15.04.2-1.fc20 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing alienarena-7.66-7.fc20 ganglia-3.7.1-2.fc20 golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0.2.1-7.gitf95d189.fc20 golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.9.hgb5adcc2.fc20 kubernetes-0.18.2-0.3.git0dfb681.fc20 pdns-3.3.3-1.fc20 pdns-recursor-3.7.3-1.fc20 perl-Encode-Locale-1.05-1.fc20 php-natxet-cssmin-3.0.3-1.fc20 python-ipaddress-1.0.7-3.fc20 python-num2words-0.5.3-1.fc20 rubygem-sequel-4.23.0-1.fc20 Details about builds: alienarena-7.66-7.fc20 (FEDORA-2015-9804) Multiplayer retro sci-fi deathmatch game Update Information: Update to SVN4307 to try to fix ragdoll crashes Eliminate some ragdoll/ode related crashes. Eliminate some ragdoll/ode related crashes. ChangeLog: * Tue Jun 9 2015 Tom Callaway - 7.66-7 - bring all code to SVN4307 to try to resolve ragdoll crashes * Mon Jan 12 2015 Tom Callaway - 7.66-6 - ragdoll fix (SVN: 4304) * Tue Nov 4 2014 Tom Callaway - 7.66-5 - rebuild for new libode * Fri Aug 15 2014 Fedora Release Engineering - 7.66-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Jun 7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering - 7.66-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1007092 - The ragdolls option causes crash with ODE INTERNAL ERROR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007092
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400 > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because > > remixes > > wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. > > > > However, there's something to be said for including them together > > in > > the same upstream project and generating separate tarballs from the > > same source. > > And/or perhaps conditionalize the spec file so the same one largely > works for both packages? > Well, probably has to be a template spec that we generate a different copy for each package, otherwise we'd still be distributing potentially trademarked content in the spec file. But yeah, I'm sure we can design it so that most edits could be made in a single place. Does someone want to file a ticket? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes > wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. > > However, there's something to be said for including them together in > the same upstream project and generating separate tarballs from the > same source. And/or perhaps conditionalize the spec file so the same one largely works for both packages? kevin pgphnVyc9f1m_.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 > > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > > > > > That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic > > > > release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a > > > > generic > > > > live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs. > > > > > > Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this > > > change... > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561 > > Ah, nifty. ;( > > > > > I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent > > > > presets, > > > > but I don't think the implementation was done well. > > > > > > No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to > > > have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and > > > is > > > controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed. > > > > fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it > > hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I > > would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release > > source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is > > possible > > to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to > > solve. > > I'm not sure it is, but hopefully we can come up with something. > > Perhaps a easier way to merge changes from the fedora->generic one or > something. > It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. However, there's something to be said for including them together in the same upstream project and generating separate tarballs from the same source. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 > >Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > >> That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic > >> release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic > >> live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs. > > > >Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561 Ah, nifty. ;( > >> I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets, > >> but I don't think the implementation was done well. > > > >No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to > >have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is > >controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed. > > fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it > hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I > would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release > source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is possible > to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to solve. I'm not sure it is, but hopefully we can come up with something. Perhaps a easier way to merge changes from the fedora->generic one or something. kevin pgpSfrU6HkkGX.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs. Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561 I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets, but I don't think the implementation was done well. No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed. fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is possible to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to solve. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from > systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the > systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package > (as discussed about a year ago). > > That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic > release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic > live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs. Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change... > I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets, but > I don't think the implementation was done well. No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed. kevin pgpmgw7dPL9gs.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:51:11 -0500 Kevin Martin wrote: > Tried getting the koji build but there were too many dependency > issues to install it and I'm still not getting a Rawhide version that > can be installed. Still getting: > > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset from install > of fedora-release-23-0.13.noarch conflicts with file from package > systemd-219-13.fc23.x86_64 > > Error Summary > - You will need to update systemd as well / first? Why do you have such an old version? kevin pgpd14qPH0Ty9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)
Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package (as discussed about a year ago). That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs. I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets, but I don't think the implementation was done well. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
rawhide report: 20150611 changes
Compose started at Thu Jun 11 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ambari]
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-multipart)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice)
ambari-views-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:juddi-client)
[bluedevil]
bluedevil-5.3.1-1.fc23.i686 requires libKF5BluezQt.so.5
[boo]
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Utilities) =
0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Tasks) =
0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Framework) =
0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(NAnt.DotNetTasks) =
0:0.90.3780.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(NAnt.Core) = 0:0.90.3780.0
[dmlite-plugins-memcache]
dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-7.fc20.i686 requires libprotobuf.so.8
[gambas3]
gambas3-gb-pdf-3.7.1-1.fc23.i686 requires libpoppler.so.49
[hadoop]
hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet)
hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client)
hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice)
hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client)
hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice)
[hbase]
hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json)
hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core)
[julia]
julia-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so
julia-devel-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so
[matreshka]
matreshka-servlet-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires
matreshka-servlet-lib{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-servlet-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires matreshka{?_isa} =
0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires matreshka{?_isa}
= 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires
matreshka-servlet-api{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-core-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires
matreshka-spikedog-core-lib{?
Re: dnf - chroot
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:07:34 +0200, poma wrote: > # yum erase dnf > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package dnf.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased > ---> Package dnf-yum.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased > --> Processing Dependency: dnf-yum for package: yum-3.4.3-506.fc23.noarch > Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected > > > # yum erase dnf > Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected > !? I've shortened the output above. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Update FC22 - doesn't find root fs and doesn't boot
On 31.05.2015 20:08, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> And already we have fought for this user's side simplification, but it seems >> developers are very persistent when they do not need to be. > > In the past changes with this effect were reverted. This time they were not. > This generally just affects people upgrading, as anaconda has been adding > the needed stuff on the kernel command line for a while now. > > You can also hostonly_cmdline=yes to the dracut config or set hostonly=no > if you are willing to have a larger initramfs file. The latter will also help > if you switch out hardware. > > I am not sure why hostonly_cmdline=yes is not the default when hostonly=yes. > That would seem to be a better default. > dracut.conf.d/fedora.conf.example +hostonly_cmdline="no" http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dracut.git/commit/0001-fedora.conf-do-not-store-cmdline-in-image-by-default.patch?id=43a1228 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/dracut/dracut.git/commit/dracut.conf.d/fedora.conf.example?id=38e2177 no explanation why this was done -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 09.06.2015 16:47, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: >>> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. Currently tested with: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>> >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> >>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>> >> >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >> > > > Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of > - Test compilation: > http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO > ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso > > Failed to mount /sysroot https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 >>> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 >>> From mezcalero: >>> >>> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file >>> system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as >>> mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel >>> in general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the >>> initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. >>> >>> >>> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. >>> >>> >> >> Maybe >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87f2dd794b7a4df37ce5d1c8407 >> >> in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules >> > > Actually, no... it tries: > > sysroot.mount: About to execute: /usr/bin/mount live:CDLABEL=LiveCD /sysroot > -n > -o rw > Is <97><8F> just a "cosmetic" issue? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
