Re: [Tex-music] prepmx failing on example document
Hallo Benedikt, TEX kann zunächst nichts mit der Datei "netsoos.mtx" anfangen. Zuerst mußt Du "prepmx netsoos.mtx" eingeben, dann "pmxabnetsoos.pmx", dann "musixtex -p netsoos.tex". Dann erhältst Du das Resultat "netsoos.pdf", das ich im Dateianhang beilege. Liebe Grüße Christof Gesendet: Samstag, 07. April 2018 um 16:34 Uhr Von: "Benedikt Wilde" An: tex-music@tug.orgdas Resultat Betreff: Re: [Tex-music] prepmx failing on example document Of course. I attached the mtx file. Benedikt On 07.04.2018 16:25, Christof Hesse wrote: > Kannst Du wenigstens Deinen TEX- File an Deine Frage anhängen? So kann niemand > eine vernünftige Antwort geben, weil niemand da Problem reproduzieren kann. > Liebe Grüße Christof > *Gesendet:* Samstag, 07. April 2018 um 15:00 Uhr > *Von:* "Benedikt Wilde" > *An:* "Tex Music" > *Betreff:* [Tex-music] prepmx failing on example document > Hello everyone, > > I have been wanting to start using MusiXTeX for some time now, but the > following error prevented me from doing so. I have searched for a > solution in various places online, but could not find any. Hopefully, > someone here can help me. > > When I try to run musixtex on the example file netsoos.mtx from the > MusiXTeX site [1], I get the following output in the console > > d:\folder>musixtex netsoos > This is musixtex.lua version 0.19. > ==> This is M-Tx 0.63 (Music from TeXt) <7 January 2018> > !! prepmx preprocessing of netsoos.mtx fails. > > and the program crashes. > The (rather unhelpful) content of musixtex.log is > > This is musixtex.lua version 0.19. > Processing netsoos.mtx > prepmx netsoos > !! prepmx preprocessing of netsoos.mtx fails. > > I am using MiKTeX on Windows 10. > > Any ideas on what might be the problem? > (Note: I do not have a full MiKTeX installation. Could any missing > packages be causing this behavior?) > > Thank you for your help > > Benedikt > > > PS: Some time ago I posted a question about this on tex.SE [2]. Then, I > got the additional error message > > C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\scripts\musixtex\musixtex.lua:564: bad > argument #1 to 'write' (string expected, got nil) > > This message is not present with the current version of musixtex (and > m-tx), but it may still be the same error. > > > > > [1]: http://icking-music-archive.org/software/htdocs/Introduction.html > [2]: > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/351571/m-tx-fails-bad-argument-1-to-write > --- > TeX-music@tug.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > > > > --- > TeX-music@tug.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music netsoos.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] prepmx failing on example document
Kannst Du wenigstens Deinen TEX- File an Deine Frage anhängen? So kann niemand eine vernünftige Antwort geben, weil niemand da Problem reproduzieren kann. Liebe Grüße Christof Gesendet: Samstag, 07. April 2018 um 15:00 Uhr Von: "Benedikt Wilde" An: "Tex Music" Betreff: [Tex-music] prepmx failing on example document Hello everyone, I have been wanting to start using MusiXTeX for some time now, but the following error prevented me from doing so. I have searched for a solution in various places online, but could not find any. Hopefully, someone here can help me. When I try to run musixtex on the example file netsoos.mtx from the MusiXTeX site [1], I get the following output in the console d:\folder>musixtex netsoos This is musixtex.lua version 0.19. ==> This is M-Tx 0.63 (Music from TeXt) <7 January 2018> !! prepmx preprocessing of netsoos.mtx fails. and the program crashes. The (rather unhelpful) content of musixtex.log is This is musixtex.lua version 0.19. Processing netsoos.mtx prepmx netsoos !! prepmx preprocessing of netsoos.mtx fails. I am using MiKTeX on Windows 10. Any ideas on what might be the problem? (Note: I do not have a full MiKTeX installation. Could any missing packages be causing this behavior?) Thank you for your help Benedikt PS: Some time ago I posted a question about this on tex.SE [2]. Then, I got the additional error message C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\scripts\musixtex\musixtex.lua:564: bad argument #1 to 'write' (string expected, got nil) This message is not present with the current version of musixtex (and m-tx), but it may still be the same error. [1]: http://icking-music-archive.org/software/htdocs/Introduction.html [2]: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/351571/m-tx-fails-bad-argument-1-to-write --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Placement of a one-bar coda
Raphaela, my idea would be to write the notes first with noteedit, export the result to musixtex and go there further. I enclose the musixtex- source (Latex, not TeX!) and the resulting pdf. Regards Christof Gesendet: Samstag, 02. Januar 2016 um 16:25 Uhr Von: Raphaela An: tex-music@tug.org Betreff: [Tex-music] Placement of a one-bar coda Hello all, Could some kind person please help me with a layout issue? I'm typesetting a guitar piece which has a one-bar coda, and what I would like to do is something along the lines of the (highly schematic) example layout in the attached file -- except that the final bar should be placed alongside the instruction "da capo...fine" and beneath where I've placed the "FINE" heading, rather than on the following line where it currently appears. Unfortunately my understanding of TeX is extremely limited. The layout in the example, with the coda to be placed below the last partial line of music, was provided by members of this list over ten years ago. Sadly, adapting it to place the coda where I want it is beyond my capabilities. I'd be most grateful for help! Eva-Raphaela--- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music guitar.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document guitar.tex Description: TeX document --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] MusicXML to PMX converter: xml2pmx binary for linux
Dieter, wo kann ich das Programm herbekommen? Auch Quellcode geht. Grüße Christof Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 um 09:53 Uhr Von: Dieter An: "Werner Icking Music Archive" Betreff: [Tex-music] MusicXML to PMX converter: xml2pmx binary for linux Dear all, xml2pmx is now available as linux binary. Support of the "Oberon Linux Revival" group and in particular of Peter Matthias is gratefully acknowledged. I am still working on a few limitations of the tool. Once they are resolved and I have dealt with your feedback, I will publish the program under GPL. Happy testing on Windows and on linux! Dieter --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] musixtex with more than 20 music examples
I was faced by the same problem, but helped myself in another way: I tried to build a kind of flute method with many pieces. I processed each piece with Latex X, musixflx X, Latex X and dvips X and treatd the postscript files as grahhics. This proved to be much easier than trying to cope with just one big TEX- file. Kind regards Christof Hesse Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. September 2014 um 07:20 Uhr Von: "Don Simons" An: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'" Betreff: Re: [Tex-music] musixtex with more than 20 music examples Yes, and come to think of it, we built the MusiXTeX manual with LaTeX and with many many more than 20 \startextract...\endextract To get help, you really should post an example of a LaTeX source that fails. And be sure to also post any custom TeX files you included. --Don Simons -Original Message- From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre Coulon Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 9:21 PM To: Werner Icking Music Archive Subject: Re: [Tex-music] musixtex with more than 20 music examples On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Dirk Laurie wrote: > This looks like some kind of stack overflow. Could you post the log file? And the LaTeX source! Are you working with \startextract...\endextract or \startpiece...\stoppiecee? I already made a book with about 100 short extracts. Bye, Jean-Pierre Coulon --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] musixps and extracting separate parts
Hello Terry, why not use pmx and scor2prt? You can write the score in a first step, e.g. with noteedit and then extract the three instruments with scor2prt as three separate *.tex- files. Kind regards Christof > > Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:14:33 -0400 > Von: Terrence Enger > An: tex-music@tug.org > Betreff: [Tex-music] musixps and extracting separate parts > > Greetings, > > I am using musixtex to set a piano trio written with overlapping > hairpins which start at different times. I read that musixps is > the extension to use. > > To print the score for each string instrument, I suppress the other > instruments by assigning them zero staffs. > > The simultaneous use of these features is causing some bad results ... > > (*) Each string part shows the slurs and ties written in both string > parts. This I can work around by conditioning off the slurs and > ties in the string part not printed. > > (*) The string parts do not show the hairpins. The piano score does > show these hairpins, so I conclude that the source code is not > too far wrong in this respect. > > Is it possible to do what I am attempting? Is there an available > example where it has been done? > > Thank you for your help, > Terry. > > > --- > TeX-music@tug.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] Beginer question - lines run off the page without manual breaks
Hello Kristopher,
there is no simple way for musixtex.
you must have musixtxex inyour tex- path and another program musiflx (a C-
prgram) on your computer. There is a 2- path approach: once a *.tex- file,
then musixflx "texfile", then latex or tex XXX.Tex, then you get a *.dvi --
file which can be read for instance by kdvi.
Regards Christof
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:37:26 -0500
> Von: "K. Wieland"
> An: tex-music@tug.org
> Betreff: Re: [Tex-music] Beginer question - lines run off the page
> without manual breaks
>
> All,
> Thank you for the responses. In my defense I did read the
> manual (which is obvious since I couldn't have coded the music without
> it!) . I found it helpful most of the time. I didn't find the
> suggestion to purchase a $600 software to do this "simple" job. I don't
> know enough about using PMX as a preprocessor - I'm a beginner, remember
> :).
> Is there a way to configure TexShop to do the three part compile?
> And why wouldn't the examples compile out of the box? If they needed
> a package, why didn't the compiler state that. I've attached the
> compile error.
> Is there a way to fix (the manual, the distribution, ???) so that
> others can compile without much hassles?
> Thanks,Kristopher
>
> ./avemarix.tex:4: LaTeX Error: Missing \begin{document}.
>
> See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
> Type H for immediate help. ...
>
>
>
>
> l.4 \fulltitle{M \'editation --
> Ave Maria}? {M\'editation -- Ave
> Maria}?
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] Hi all
Hi Marcello,
did you use musixflx between two rex- Runs?
REgards Christof
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:32:06 +0200
> Von: Marcello Anselmi Tamburini
> An: icking-music-archive.org-tex-music@mailman.nfit.au.dk
> Betreff: [TeX-Music] Hi all
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new in MusixTeX usage. I'm writing some little pieces in a latex
> code. If I write little extract all goes ok, but I tried to write a
> little piece and notes go in a new line before the line-end.
>
> http://yfrog.com/0ylineerrorp
>
> this is the image of the result, and this is code. What is wrong?
>
> \begin{music}
> \instrumentnumber{1}
> \setstaffs1{2}
> \setclef{1}{\bass}
> \setname1{6. }
> \generalmeter\meterC
> \nobarnumbers
> \startpiece\addspace\afterruleskip
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\centerpause\en}
> \notes\nextstaff\zchar{10}{\smalltype1}\qa{jklm}\en\bar
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\centerpause\en}
> \Notes\nextstaff\zchar{12}{\smalltype5}\ha{nn}\en\bar
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\centerpause\en}
> \notes\nextstaff\qa{mlkj}\en\bar
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\centerpause\en}
> \Notes\nextstaff\zchar{10}{\smalltype2}\ha{kk}\en\bar
> \Notes\zchar{-5}{\smalltype5}\ha{JJ}\en
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\nextstaff\centerpause\en}\bar
> \notes\qa{KLMN}\en
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\nextstaff\centerpause\en}\bar
> \Notes\zchar{-5}{\smalltype4}\ha{MM}\en
> \def\atnextbar{\znotes\nextstaff\centerpause\en}\bar
> \NOTEs\zw J\wh N\nextstaff\zw j\wh l\en
> \endpiece
> \end{music}
>
> Many thanks!
>
> --
> m.
> skype: marcello.tamburini
> ___
> tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
___
tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx
>From my experience in conducting it is very helpful for the orientation in a >score to see the transposing instruments with different "Vorzeichen" than the >non- transposing instruments. For me this notation is the natural one. regards Christof Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:11:51 +0200 > Von: "Cornelius C. Noack" > An: Werner Icking Music Archive > > Betreff: Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Don Simons wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 11:34:45 -0700 > > From: Don Simons > > Subject: Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx > > > > Naturally when I saw Luigi's posting (which BTW I understood clearly; no > > need to apologize for the English) I wondered how much work it would be > to > > make PMX do this. I'll give it some more thought. As usual I'd have to > > re-educate myself about what PMX does now under transposition, and also > > explore MusiXTeX capabilities in this area. I'd have to do some pretty > > serious empirical research to work out how to make MusiXTeX transpose > > different parts by different amounts. Also, it's not obvious to me that > > everyone would always want to enter all parts in concert key; would > anyone > > ever want to enter parts in their transposed keys? > > > > --Don Simons > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: icking-music-archive.org-tex-music-boun...@mailman.nfit.au.dk > >> [mailto:icking-music-archive.org-tex-music-boun...@mailman.nfit.au.dk] > >> On Behalf Of Christian Mondrup > >> Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 10:43 AM > >> To: Werner Icking Music Archive > >> Subject: Re: [TeX-Music] Transposition with abcpp and pmx > >> > >> Luigi Cataldi wrote: > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> I've found a *not so polish* trick in order to keep the advantage of > >> the > >>> first method when we need to use the second one, with the aid of the > >>> abcpp preprocessor. Abcpp allows to define different note names and > >>> conditional output. So we have to: > >>> 1) define a set of note names for the first transposing instrument (XA > >> = > >>> f, XB = g etc.) and another one for the second (YA = c, YB = d etc.); > >>> 2) set in conditional way a different definition of the same symbols > >> (XA > >>> = a, YA = a) so that if TRASP is defined the output will be transposed > >>> and if not the output will not be transposed; > >>> 3) Typeset the transposing parts with relative accidents and in > >>> different ways (XA, XB or YA, YB etc). > >>> 4) compile with the command > >>> 'abcpp -TRASP sample.pmp sample_tr.pmx' > >>> in order to obtain the score to print in editorial way > >>> 5) compile with the command > >>> 'abcpp sample.pmp sample.pmx' > >>> in order to obtain the score not transposed and > >>> the extracted (if needed transposed) parts. > >> > First of all, many thanks to Luigi for dealing with this problem > and coming up with a solution! Ever since I wrote down Mozart's > Mauerische Trauermusik in PMX (6 years ago, to the memory of Daniel > Taupin in WIMA), I had been bothered by this problem. > > Now, to Don's question: IMHO both version are needed, or at least > useful! For the non-professional reader of a score, seeing the > written notes the way they sound in reality is certainly an > advantage. The professional conductor, however, is quite used to > earing in his mind the written transposed notes as they sound in > reality, and would possibly find seeing them non-transposed an > inconvenience in discussing the music with the instrumentalists > during rehearsal. > In fact, most printed scores (even pocket scores) use the > transposed notes for the transposing instruments (These editorial > usages become really awkard, BTW , in contemporary music where you > may see a voice simply named 'clarinet' , leaving the reader with > sometimes extended research into whether the composer meant a > clarinet in B flat or E flat or else, transposed or non-transposed, > for example, with no accidentals to help her decide!). > > So I would love to see a simple general PMX option to choose one > or the other of the 2 notations. > > ccn. > -- > . > > Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: > Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 > Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 > Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 > D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 > Fax: 346 7872 > E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org > WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack > . > ___ > tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music
Re: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:13:51 +0200 Von: "Cornelius C. Noack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Werner Icking Music Archive Betreff: Re: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Christof Hesse wrote: > > > >> das Stück ist mit großer Sicherheit das Trio für zwei Oboen und > >> Englisch Horn von Ludwig van Beethoven ( op. 87) Es existiert in > >> zahlreichen teils zeitgenössischen (Betthoven- Zeit) > >> Umschriften, so für drei Flöten, zu haben bei der Edition > >> Kossack (95106), im Original wohl bei Peters oder Breitkopf und > >> Härtel, evtl. bei Henle (Urtext) oder UT (Urtext- Edition > >> Schott- Universal). > > > > Right for the Adagio and Allegro, but I can't find the first > > movement here: > > > > > http://imslp.ca/images/imslp.ca/b/b3/Beethoven_Trio_for_2_Oboes_and_English_Horn_Op.87.pdf > > > > Jean-Pierre Coulon [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thank you, jean-Pierre and Christof, for this speedy answer! I am > actually pretty satisfied that I got major things right by just > reading the oboe part: wind chamber music and Beethoven were > on the dot. > > Jean-Pierre: the reason you couldn't identify the first movement > is that what I had written was indeed not the beginning of the > movement, because the first page was missing. I now can see that > more than half of that movement was lost: the bar where my text > started is actually bar 190 (of 260). > > And I'm sorry for the typos; I didn't spend any time proofreading. > > Now I have to find an E.H. to actually play the gem -- neither do > I own one, nor do I know a non-professional English-horn player in > Bremen. I guess I'll yet have to use PMX to make a transposed > version for one of my clarinet friends. > > Thanks again! > > ccn. > -- > . > >Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: >Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 >Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 >Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 >D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 > Fax: 346 7872 >E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org >WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack > . Cornelius, es gibt eine Transkription des Trios für Flöte, Oboe und Klarinette im Musikalienhandel; ich habe sie für einen Kollegen bestellt. Grüße Christof ___ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:18:26 +0200 Von: Jean-Pierre Coulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Werner Icking Music Archive Betreff: Re: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question > ___ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music Hello Pierre, compared to the original,but in Cornelius' musixtex- excerpt the note values where too long and the open beginning with the sharp punctuation was lacking Regards Christof ___ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:14:41 +0200 Von: "Cornelius C. Noack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Werner Icking Music Archive Betreff: [TeX-Music] off-topic music question > Dear friends, > my problem today is not at all about music typesetting, but > actually rather a music puzzle: > > Someone gave me a carbon copy of the oboe part of a piece, > obviously chamber music for (some) wind instruments. Since its > been a while, all my efforts to find out who gave this to me were > in vain. > > And on top of that, the first page of the sheet got lost in the > mail, and thus also the name of the composer!! Judging from the > style, it could be an early Beethoven, but Danzi or someone like > that also comes to mind. > > IMHO, the piece is lively enough (if not outright charming) to > warrant the search for composer and piece, and, finally, retrieval > of the full score. > > So now I have used PMX/MusixTeX to write up some excerpts of the > oboe part (start and end of the first 3 movements --- there is a > fourth movement: Finale presto ---, and am asking all my good > music friends: > > WHO CAN HELP IN IDENTIFYNG THIS ??? > > I hope that, for a change, this question may also provide some > fun, at least for some of you! > > If someone feels she needs a more complete version of the oboe part > (that, however, is all I have), let me know, I'll send a full copy > of what I have. > > The 3 movements ar attached as PDF files. > As usual, thanks for any help. > > ccn. > -- > . > >Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: >Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 >Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 >Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 >D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 > Fax: 346 7872 >E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org >WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack > . Lieber Cornelius, das Stück ist mit großer Sicherheit das Trio für zwei Oboen und Englisch Horn von Ludwig van Beethoven ( op. 87) Es existiert in zahlreichen teils zeitgenössischen (Betthoven- Zeit) Umschriften, so für drei Flöten, zu haben bei der Edition Kossack (95106), im Original wohl bei Peters oder Breitkopf und Härtel, evtl. bei Henle (Urtext) oder UT (Urtext- Edition Schott- Universal). Grüße Christof Hesse (Flötist). ___ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-music] PMX Emacs Editing mode ... I made one
> > I have made a simple PMX editing mode for Emacs. > > Excellent! I have been looking for this for years! > > Stefan > > > ___ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > Excellent, how can I get it? Christof ___ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
