Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-13 Thread Rob Kimberley
Burt, what is your DAC setting now it's stabilised? It is normally set so it
is mid-range when setting these units up.
Rob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Burt I. Weiner
Sent: 12 April 2013 19:49
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

Sorry for the delay in posting this update.  Things have been hectic, and
then there was NAB.

Here's what I've discovered:  The receiver started working after about 6
hours of just sitting.  However, the 9390's internal Vectron oscillator was
quite a ways off frequency and did not want to lock after trying to
stabilize all night.  I had to tweak the adjustment screw quite a ways and
then, after a while, it locked.  Prior to this episode the oscillator had
been sitting at only a few E-12.  I suspect that this oscillator has had an
intermittent problem for a long time, and I should not have had to tweak it
as far as it wanted to go.  The receiver portion has not failed in the few
weeks since it decided to start seeing satellites again.  Maybe because I
had tweaked the oscillator?

So, I got brave and changed the oscillator out with a smaller Vectron
oscillator that I got from my friend Stu, K6YAZ.  This is not a commercial,
but he sells these oscillator modules on eBay.  See: 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/10-MHz-precision-crystal-oscillator-in-sealed-oven-5
-volts-voltage-adjustable-/190820631639?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item2c6dc
bc457#ht_848wt_1143

The new oscillator requires 5 Volts rather than 12 Volts, which I simply
grabbed from the from the power supply's 5 Volt rail.  It was not a lot of
fun removing the original oscillator from the circuit board and the
associated fine traces, but once I plucked it from the board I put short
wire leads in the original circuit board holes for the various connections
to the new oscillator.  I cut a piece of foam about the size of the old
Vectron and carved out it's innards to accept the new, much smaller
oscillator.  This should provide some thermal stability and also insulate
the new oscillator from the circuit board.  I connected everything up,
substituting the 5 Volt rail lead for the 12 Volt lead.  When I powered the
9390 up everything seemed to work and the oscillator was within 1-Hertz,
except that the output was about 20 dB higher than with the original
oscillator was when it was working properly.  Once the receiver locked up to
4 satellites and started OSC Stabilizing, the oscillator suddenly jumped
about 18 Hz low and shortly afterwards the DAC went to all zeros.  I let it
sit all night figuring that it would eventually find itself.  Well, it
didn't, it just sat at 18 Hz low and the DAC at all zeros, and the EFC
(Electronic Frequency Control) voltage at 0.19 Volts.  (What a revolting
development!)

Very early this AM I got up and put a simple 10:1 voltage divider using a
series 680 Ohm and 68 Ohm resistor from the oscillator's RF out to ground
This brought the levels pretty much back to the same as my good 9390.  I
also substituted a pot for the EFC voltage.  I used a 1 K pot in series with
a 300 Ohm resistor to the 5 Volt rail.  The resistor was on the high side,
the bottom end to ground, and the wiper to the EFC terminal.  I was able to
tune the oscillator to precisely 10 MHz long enough to measure the
substitute EFC at +2.15 Volts.  Leaving it hooked up this way I let the
receiver do it's thing just to see what would happen.  It went through it's
normal routine and finally the green lock light came on.  Although the
oscillator wasn't being controlled by the 9390, the 9390 thought it was
happy and the DAC went to about 28,000 - very close to ideal.  I tweaked the
pot hither and yon to move the frequency and to see which way the EFC
voltage went.  It went the right direction to properly steer the oscillator
and should have worked.

Pondering the situation, I powered the 9390 down and reconnected the 9390's
EFC voltage back up to see what would happen this time.  This time it locked
up quickly and the oscillator homed in on 10 MHz.  The EFC voltage is 2.15
Volts and the DAC settled in nicely at 28302 - very close to the recommended
DAC numbers.  It's been cooking for about an hour now and is presently at
112E-12 and moving closer all the time.  When comparing the two GPS
receivers I am not seeing the random drifts that I had seen in the past.

I suspect that the problem with the frequency jumping to -18 Hz and the DAC
going to all zeros was the result of the new oscillator over-driving the
following circuitry.  In hindsight, maybe I should have probed a bit with
the scope to see if that is a correct assumption, but I didn't do that.

By the way, Stu sells the oscillators fully tested and with a note giving
the EFC voltage for each unit to tune it to 10 MHz.  If this turns out to be
as good a modification as it now appears, I'm going to get more of the
oscillators from him.  I may replace the one in my other 

Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread mehdi

 hi dears
i'm newer here.
i have some questions about loran-c receiver.can you help me?
i want to know how can i find third zero crossing in loran-c receiver?
i find third zero cross by peterson 's method from this paper:
Analysis of Noise and Cycle Selection in a Loran Receiver
but due to Gausian noise,when i find third zero cross,it is not correct and
it is before or after correct third zero cross.i want to know how can i
track and correct third zero cross?(in other words what is acquisition in
loran-c receivers and how can i do?)
have you any matlab code or papers or thesis for this problems?
please help me?
:(
thanks a lot

 
 




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread Rob Kimberley
Hi,

I don't know this model from Austron, but you could try asking fellow Time
Nuts if anyone has a manual for the 5000 which should include the full
calibration procedure. 

I know on the Austron 2000C the calibration procedure was quite a long to
set it up correctly. I'm sure that the 5000 will be similar.

Rob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of mehdi
Sent: 13 April 2013 13:08
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver


 hi dears
i'm newer here.
i have some questions about loran-c receiver.can you help me?
i want to know how can i find third zero crossing in loran-c receiver?
i find third zero cross by peterson 's method from this paper:
Analysis of Noise and Cycle Selection in a Loran Receiver but due to Gausian
noise,when i find third zero cross,it is not correct and it is before or
after correct third zero cross.i want to know how can i track and correct
third zero cross?(in other words what is acquisition in loran-c receivers
and how can i do?) have you any matlab code or papers or thesis for this
problems?
please help me?
:(
thanks a lot

 
 




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The concept you most commonly see is a curve fit approach. You know the 
structure of the waveform through several cycles. You can fit this model 
waveform to the observed data over a large number of points. As you fit more 
points, the impact of the noise is reduced.

Bob

On Apr 13, 2013, at 8:07 AM, mehdi electrostud...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 hi dears
 i'm newer here.
 i have some questions about loran-c receiver.can you help me?
 i want to know how can i find third zero crossing in loran-c receiver?
 i find third zero cross by peterson 's method from this paper:
 Analysis of Noise and Cycle Selection in a Loran Receiver
 but due to Gausian noise,when i find third zero cross,it is not correct and
 it is before or after correct third zero cross.i want to know how can i
 track and correct third zero cross?(in other words what is acquisition in
 loran-c receivers and how can i do?)
 have you any matlab code or papers or thesis for this problems?
 please help me?
 :(
 thanks a lot
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread brent evers
Scotchkote!  Yes - Thank you for the correction!  The other could lead to
disaster!

Nope - not ex-navy.  Its pretty standard practice in the offshore world.
My time was spent on research vessels down in Antarctica.

Apologies for the mix-up.

Brent


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:

 OK this is crazy I answered out of sequence not realizing my email had
 never been sent.
 Describing Navy and ScotchKote...
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL


 On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:36 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:

  Brent
  You must be ex-Navy. We did the same thing with a final coat
  of liquid rubber. 3M scotch coat. On the ships I could open a connector
  that had been to sea for years and the connectors were clean as they were
  when installed. I still use this approach. Very solid and as I mentioned
  earlier in the thread I use the F connectors for lots of things.
 
 
  On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:01 PM, brent evers brent.ev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  BTW - 3M Scotch rubber tape is regularly used in the offshore industry
 to
  make waterproof connections to 6000m/10,000psi.  I use it on any/all
  outdoor signal (RF/Microwve antenna connectors, amphenol, etc)
 connectors
  as well.  I cover the rubber tape with a layer of electrical tape (Super
  88), and then a layer of scotchguard over that.
 
  Scotch rubber tape comes in both a linered (23), and liner-less (130C)
  version.  I far prefer the liner-less 130c.
 
  To make sure this is time related, my two Thunderbolt antenna connectors
  are also sealed this way.
 
  Brent
 
 
 
  On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Rob Kimberley 
  robkimber...@btinternet.com
   wrote:
 
   It's a very useful material, also called Self Amalgamating Tape.
  
   Been using it for years for all sorts of outside cable work.
  
   Rob
  
   -Original Message-
   From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On
   Behalf Of Azelio Boriani
   Sent: 12 April 2013 14:00
   To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Connectors
  
   Sorry, not neoprene but self-sealing polyisobutyl tape, very effective
  for
   the outdoor antenna work**. I have recently opened a sealed
 connection,
   after 10 years, and the protected connector appears as new.
  
   On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Azelio Boriani
   azelio.bori...@screen.itwrote:
  
I use neoprene tape to make really water tight connections for all
type of connectors.
   
   
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
   
Hi
   
The fancy F connectors are indeed waterproof if:
   
1) You have the right cable
2) The cable and connector match up
3) The tool and the connector match up
   
The auction sites are a great place to get samples of connectors
 and
tools that apparently work with no known cable .
   
If you are not careful about the trim on the dielectric /
 positioning
, they can have issues above 1 or 2 GHz. Even a lot of care they
don't really do the job above 5 GHz. Exactly where they drop out
depends (of course) on your return loss expectations.
   
Bob
   
On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Gordon Batey gpba...@wildblue.net
  wrote:
   
 Greetings,

 I have used the longitudinal compression F connectors for some
 time
 now
with
 several GPS units and RG-6 cable.  They certainly appear to be
waterproof
 and quite sturdy.  Not inexpensive but very serviceable.  I
 found a
 kit
with
 the installation tool and connectors and separate connectors at
 LOWES
that
 does a nice job.  I also found one for BNC that use the same
 principle
but
 have not used it yet.  Gordon WA4FJC

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go
 to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
   
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
   
   
   
   ___
   time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
   To unsubscribe, go to
   https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
   and follow the instructions there.
  
  
   ___
   time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
   To unsubscribe, go to
   https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
   and follow the instructions there.
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- 

Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread paul swed
Its a master timing rcvr from the simple research I have done. Must be
fallout from the US LORAN C shut down. Anyhow The whole signal spec is here.
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=loranSignalSpec
Its a 8 MB zip
I have done the 2000 procedure and it is complicated to say the least.
Given the vintage of the 5000 it might be the same. But that was quite a
while ago.
Are you in the US?
Regards
Paul


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rob Kimberley
robkimber...@btinternet.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I don't know this model from Austron, but you could try asking fellow Time
 Nuts if anyone has a manual for the 5000 which should include the full
 calibration procedure.

 I know on the Austron 2000C the calibration procedure was quite a long to
 set it up correctly. I'm sure that the 5000 will be similar.

 Rob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of mehdi
 Sent: 13 April 2013 13:08
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver


  hi dears
 i'm newer here.
 i have some questions about loran-c receiver.can you help me?
 i want to know how can i find third zero crossing in loran-c receiver?
 i find third zero cross by peterson 's method from this paper:
 Analysis of Noise and Cycle Selection in a Loran Receiver but due to
 Gausian
 noise,when i find third zero cross,it is not correct and it is before or
 after correct third zero cross.i want to know how can i track and correct
 third zero cross?(in other words what is acquisition in loran-c receivers
 and how can i do?) have you any matlab code or papers or thesis for this
 problems?
 please help me?
 :(
 thanks a lot

 
 




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread paul swed
An additional thought.
The third cycle is not the thing you would see on a scope looking at the
raw signal. The rcvr determines when the signal has risen above 0. That may
be 1 to 2 really small cycles. Its from that point its the 3rd crossing.
Normally there is a gate out signal thats useful to trigger the scope with.
Regards
Paul



On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:55 AM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Its a master timing rcvr from the simple research I have done. Must be
 fallout from the US LORAN C shut down. Anyhow The whole signal spec is here.
 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=loranSignalSpec
 Its a 8 MB zip
 I have done the 2000 procedure and it is complicated to say the least.
 Given the vintage of the 5000 it might be the same. But that was quite a
 while ago.
 Are you in the US?
 Regards
 Paul


 On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rob Kimberley 
 robkimber...@btinternet.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I don't know this model from Austron, but you could try asking fellow Time
 Nuts if anyone has a manual for the 5000 which should include the full
 calibration procedure.

 I know on the Austron 2000C the calibration procedure was quite a long to
 set it up correctly. I'm sure that the 5000 will be similar.

 Rob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of mehdi
 Sent: 13 April 2013 13:08
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver


  hi dears
 i'm newer here.
 i have some questions about loran-c receiver.can you help me?
 i want to know how can i find third zero crossing in loran-c receiver?
 i find third zero cross by peterson 's method from this paper:
 Analysis of Noise and Cycle Selection in a Loran Receiver but due to
 Gausian
 noise,when i find third zero cross,it is not correct and it is before or
 after correct third zero cross.i want to know how can i track and correct
 third zero cross?(in other words what is acquisition in loran-c receivers
 and how can i do?) have you any matlab code or papers or thesis for this
 problems?
 please help me?
 :(
 thanks a lot

 
 




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver

2013-04-13 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
See if this helps:
http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/au2100f/scope.htm

/tvb (iPhone4)
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist


OK, so we seem to have:

1)  Scotch 130 rubber tape
2)  Scotch 33 electrical tape
3)  Scotchkote

in that order.

So the rubber tape waterproofs
the connection and the scotch kote
protects it from UV, so what does
the electrical tape do?

Or maybe, the electrical tape does
the waterproofing and the rubber tape
just keeps goo off the connector.  But
of course, that can be done with the well
known technique of winding the connector
with electrical tape adhesive side out.

Do we know that the rubber tape is not UV
proof?

Or none of the above.

Can someone in the know clarify this?

Thanks,

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread Hal Murray
 Can someone in the know clarify this?

I'm not in the know.

Several years ago, I found a short chunk of coax that the cable TV guys had 
left on the ground.  It included a piece of heavy wall shrink tubing.  There 
was a layer of sticky goop between the coax and the shrink tubing.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread paul swed
Rick
It is a very rare time I get to answer you.
The plastic tape holds the rubber end initially, adds another layer of wx,
and in reality is sacrificial to UV over the years. First the liquid rubber
gives up. Then the plastic. Thats a big clue when it gets ratty. Time to
change. Fact is even at that point it will hold for a very long time beyond
that point. Each layer helps to hold things together.

My experience was in the Navy aboard ship. But I have used the method for
many years on the tower for all of the heliax and all other connections.

What I would love to know is what makes the liquid rubber, liquid. It
evaporates off over time (And it seems no matter how hard you try to seal
the container) and that always kills off the can of scotchkote. I will bet
I waste 1/2 a can that way.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:


 OK, so we seem to have:

 1)  Scotch 130 rubber tape
 2)  Scotch 33 electrical tape
 3)  Scotchkote

 in that order.

 So the rubber tape waterproofs
 the connection and the scotch kote
 protects it from UV, so what does
 the electrical tape do?

 Or maybe, the electrical tape does
 the waterproofing and the rubber tape
 just keeps goo off the connector.  But
 of course, that can be done with the well
 known technique of winding the connector
 with electrical tape adhesive side out.

 Do we know that the rubber tape is not UV
 proof?

 Or none of the above.

 Can someone in the know clarify this?

 Thanks,

 Rick
 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread David
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:07:05 -0700, Hal Murray
hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:

 Can someone in the know clarify this?

I'm not in the know.

Several years ago, I found a short chunk of coax that the cable TV guys had 
left on the ground.  It included a piece of heavy wall shrink tubing.  There 
was a layer of sticky goop between the coax and the shrink tubing.

They make adhesive lined or dual wall heat shrink tubing for
applications requiring a better seal:

http://www.3m.com/product/information/Heat-Shrink-Adhesive-Lined-Tubing.html
http://www.buyheatshrink.com/heatshrinktubing/3to1adhesive.htm
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-13 Thread David I. Emery
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:48:47AM -0700, Burt I. Weiner wrote:
 Sorry for the delay in posting this update.  Things have been hectic, 
 and then there was NAB.
 
 Here's what I've discovered:  The receiver started working after 
 about 6 hours of just sitting.  However, the 9390's internal Vectron 
 oscillator was quite a ways off frequency and did not want to lock 
 after trying to stabilize all night.  I had to tweak the adjustment 
 screw quite a ways and then, after a while, it locked.  Prior to this 
 episode the oscillator had been sitting at only a few E-12.  I 
 suspect that this oscillator has had an intermittent problem for a 
 long time, and I should not have had to tweak it as far as it wanted 
 to go.  The receiver portion has not failed in the few weeks since it 
 decided to start seeing satellites again.  Maybe because I had 
 tweaked the oscillator?

I have an ancient 9390 that has an ancient Trimble GPS board in
it that takes a 16.368 reference synthesized from the 10 MHz standard in
a PLL loop with a VXCO. This is used in the L band downconversion... 
and for timing generally and given that is PLL derived from the 10 MHz
quite likely if the 10 MHz is significantly wrong the receiver won't
find satellites.   I remember I had to fix this PLL in my box before the
receiver in that box would lock up... initially the PLL wasn't locked,
but the 16.368 VCXO output WAS present  - so for that receiver it has to
be pretty close to right on to work.


-- 
  Dave Emery N1PRE/AE, d...@dieconsulting.com  DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass 
02493
An empty zombie mind with a forlorn barely readable weatherbeaten
'For Rent' sign still vainly flapping outside on the weed encrusted pole - in 
celebration of what could have been, but wasn't and is not to be now either.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Think of heat shrink with a layer of hot melt glue on the inside. Such stuff is 
used in most outdoor and especially underground utility wiring.  Shrink the 
tubing and it melts the glue and the contracting tubing forces the glue into 
every crevice making a great waterproof splice.



On 4/13/2013 5:07 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

Can someone in the know clarify this?

I'm not in the know.

Several years ago, I found a short chunk of coax that the cable TV guys had
left on the ground.  It included a piece of heavy wall shrink tubing.  There
was a layer of sticky goop between the coax and the shrink tubing.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread paul swed
Yes its from the heat shrink.
When they shrink the wrap it forms an air proof seal.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:

  Can someone in the know clarify this?

 I'm not in the know.

 Several years ago, I found a short chunk of coax that the cable TV guys had
 left on the ground.  It included a piece of heavy wall shrink tubing.
  There
 was a layer of sticky goop between the coax and the shrink tubing.


 --
 These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread DaveH
Kind of a cool technology -- they bombard the outside of the tube with an
electron beam that cross-links the polymer but leaves the inside untouched.
The outside becomes hard but still shrinks.  The inside just melts into a
goo when heated.

Dave 

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com 
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Peter Gottlieb
 Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 15:24
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Connectors
 
 Think of heat shrink with a layer of hot melt glue on the 
 inside. Such stuff is 
 used in most outdoor and especially underground utility 
 wiring.  Shrink the 
 tubing and it melts the glue and the contracting tubing 
 forces the glue into 
 every crevice making a great waterproof splice.
 
 
 On 4/13/2013 5:07 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
  Can someone in the know clarify this?
  I'm not in the know.
 
  Several years ago, I found a short chunk of coax that the 
 cable TV guys had
  left on the ground.  It included a piece of heavy wall 
 shrink tubing.  There
  was a layer of sticky goop between the coax and the shrink tubing.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Connectors

2013-04-13 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:58 AM, brent evers brent.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
 Scotchkote!  Yes - Thank you for the correction!  The other could lead to
 disaster!

 Nope - not ex-navy.  Its pretty standard practice in the offshore world.
 My time was spent on research vessels down in Antarctica.

I used to own a sailboat.  I used almost the same thing.  Liquid
rubber' as sold at Home Depot it comes in a can with a brush attached
to the lid.  It was especially good for bolted connection used on
batteries.  The boat had 6 large (50+ pounds each) lead acid wet cells
and then each connects to a 250 amp fuze and a switch and so on.
There were many bolted connecters with #00 cable.  Quite a few antenna
leads too with GPS, HF and VHF radios and radar.   Nothing like on a
large ship but still tons of wire.

In all of this I never have much trouble with the connectors.
Problems where with the wire itself.  It would be nicked or abraded or
the space between the connecter and insolation would allow water or
damp air to get in and it would wick down the cable and after time
corrode the coper and turn it into green goo.

The design of these new kind of compression connectors, the ones that
require axial force to install is that there is a rube seal that goes
over the outer insolation jacket.  This seal keep water out of the
most critical place.   The liquid rubber paint works well too.
--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.