Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
On 8/25/16 8:12 PM, Bill Metzenthen wrote: On 26/08/16 08:14, Hal Murray wrote: billm...@gmail.com said: If the conductor also has magnetic properties (e.g. if iron were used) then magnetic saturation could be an issue. Ah... Sorry I wasn't clear. How about Is skin depth an interesting concept if you are using materials commonly used for magnetic shielding, for example mu-metal? The electrical conduction is poor so the normal skin depth reasoning probably won't be useful in practical examples. For skin depth, the lower conductivity of mu-metal is more than compensated for by its higher permeability. At 50 Hz its skin depth is calculated to be around 0.3 mm assuming that the conductivity and permeability are real (as distinct from complex) and everything is linear. I haven't needed to consider what happens when these assumptions aren't valid so I could only guess how rapidly the skin depth increases when a magnetic material such as mu-metal is pushed past its linear region. The usual skin depth calculation is based upon assumptions about the form of the electromagnetic field and the conductor, which might not apply to the situation in which one is interested. Despite this, it is often used to get an estimate which is useful in a range of applications. it's all about sqrt( rho/mu)... good conductivity and high mu are what you want. soft iron works well... heck, steel works well for a lot of applications. Mu metal (which as others have noted has all sorts of handling and fabrication issues) is for the more exotic cases.. But, could you not run a differential pair of fibers, and both would be affected, but with opposite signs ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
On 26/08/16 08:14, Hal Murray wrote: billm...@gmail.com said: If the conductor also has magnetic properties (e.g. if iron were used) then magnetic saturation could be an issue. Ah... Sorry I wasn't clear. How about Is skin depth an interesting concept if you are using materials commonly used for magnetic shielding, for example mu-metal? The electrical conduction is poor so the normal skin depth reasoning probably won't be useful in practical examples. For skin depth, the lower conductivity of mu-metal is more than compensated for by its higher permeability. At 50 Hz its skin depth is calculated to be around 0.3 mm assuming that the conductivity and permeability are real (as distinct from complex) and everything is linear. I haven't needed to consider what happens when these assumptions aren't valid so I could only guess how rapidly the skin depth increases when a magnetic material such as mu-metal is pushed past its linear region. The usual skin depth calculation is based upon assumptions about the form of the electromagnetic field and the conductor, which might not apply to the situation in which one is interested. Despite this, it is often used to get an estimate which is useful in a range of applications. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Let's know if they get to the bottom of this, Magnus- its interesting to speculate on the cause but hopefully they figure out the real issue. DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 11:06 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details from 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. Would be nice to verify it. Cheers, Magnus On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of 100 Hz. I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends on the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which is why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits with piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does follow the sign. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic but maybe doping can make them susceptible? On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre ... These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of current in it. ... Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
to shield against DC and low frequency magnetic field usually high permeability magnetizable material -- Permalloy, Mu-metal or similar is used, the field concentrates in the high permeability material and "behind it" is no left over magnetic field 73 Alex On 8/25/2016 11:10 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: Hi, On 08/25/2016 11:04 AM, Bill Metzenthen wrote: On 25/08/16 18:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <1057836989.2088307.1472104857885.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>, Br uce Griffiths writes: You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively against the 50Hz magnetic field. As in: A good-sized fraction of the wavelength if I recall :-) Electric fields are so much easier... One interesting thing here is that across distances like this, there would be significant longitudal currents in such a shield. Not as bad as metal spanning the Mississippi, but getting there. Skin depth is probably a good place to start with in roughly estimating the thickness needed. In copper at 50 Hz, a quick calculation suggests 9.5 mm, but this just the depth at which the E-M field decreases by 1/e or 8.7 dB. Thus to get 20 dB attenuation this implies a thickness of about 22 mm, etc. While interesting, I think you are going overboard. The easy remedy is to move the fiber of the power-cable and put it on some distance, just choose a different path for it in the building. Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12877 - Release Date: 08/25/16 ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
billm...@gmail.com said: > If the conductor also has magnetic properties (e.g. if iron were used) then > magnetic saturation could be an issue. Ah... Sorry I wasn't clear. How about Is skin depth an interesting concept if you are using materials commonly used for magnetic shielding, for example mu-metal? The electrical conduction is poor so the normal skin depth reasoning probably won't be useful in practical examples. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
On 26/08/16 06:33, Hal Murray wrote: billm...@gmail.com said: Skin depth is probably a good place to start with in roughly estimating the thickness needed. In copper at 50 Hz, ... Is skin depth an appropriate concept for magnetic shielding? Or does it get messed up by saturation? Skin depth is appropriate for an electromagnetic field. It doesn't apply for a static electric or magnetic field but does apply for a varying magnetic field. Without going into the details of electromagnetic field theory, the mechanism is that the varying magnetic field induces a current in the conductor (copper under consideration here) and that this current in turn produces a magnetic field which opposes the original magnetic field. Strictly magnetic effects, e.g. ferromagnetism, play no part in this scenario and hence saturation is not an issue. If the conductor also has magnetic properties (e.g. if iron were used) then magnetic saturation could be an issue. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
billm...@gmail.com said: > Skin depth is probably a good place to start with in roughly estimating the > thickness needed. In copper at 50 Hz, ... Is skin depth an appropriate concept for magnetic shielding? Or does it get messed up by saturation? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Hi, On 08/25/2016 11:04 AM, Bill Metzenthen wrote: On 25/08/16 18:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <1057836989.2088307.1472104857885.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>, Br uce Griffiths writes: You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively against the 50Hz magnetic field. As in: A good-sized fraction of the wavelength if I recall :-) Electric fields are so much easier... One interesting thing here is that across distances like this, there would be significant longitudal currents in such a shield. Not as bad as metal spanning the Mississippi, but getting there. Skin depth is probably a good place to start with in roughly estimating the thickness needed. In copper at 50 Hz, a quick calculation suggests 9.5 mm, but this just the depth at which the E-M field decreases by 1/e or 8.7 dB. Thus to get 20 dB attenuation this implies a thickness of about 22 mm, etc. While interesting, I think you are going overboard. The easy remedy is to move the fiber of the power-cable and put it on some distance, just choose a different path for it in the building. Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
On 25/08/16 18:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <1057836989.2088307.1472104857885.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>, Br uce Griffiths writes: You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively against the 50Hz magnetic field. As in: A good-sized fraction of the wavelength if I recall :-) Electric fields are so much easier... One interesting thing here is that across distances like this, there would be significant longitudal currents in such a shield. Not as bad as metal spanning the Mississippi, but getting there. Skin depth is probably a good place to start with in roughly estimating the thickness needed. In copper at 50 Hz, a quick calculation suggests 9.5 mm, but this just the depth at which the E-M field decreases by 1/e or 8.7 dB. Thus to get 20 dB attenuation this implies a thickness of about 22 mm, etc. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Hi There is also the minor issue of putting the (very thick) layers on in a spiral around the "core". You put one layer on clockwise and the next counter clockwise. Since the materials are quite springy, controlling the whole process through heat treating is a real chore. Bob > On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:25 AM, Poul-Henning Kampwrote: > > > In message <1057836989.2088307.1472104857885.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>, > Br > uce Griffiths writes: > >> You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively >> against the 50Hz magnetic field. > > As in: A good-sized fraction of the wavelength if I recall :-) > > Electric fields are so much easier... > > One interesting thing here is that across distances like this, > there would be significant longitudal currents in such a shield. > > Not as bad as metal spanning the Mississippi, but getting there. > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Bruce wrote: As long as you don't saturate it, bend it, hit it or drop it. And that is AFTER you form it to shape and then anneal it in a Hydrogen atmosphere. You may (probably would) need several layers, perhaps of different high-permeability alloys, with a thick outermost layer of soft iron. Best regards, Charles ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
In message <1057836989.2088307.1472104857885.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>, Br uce Griffiths writes: >You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively >against the 50Hz magnetic field. As in: A good-sized fraction of the wavelength if I recall :-) Electric fields are so much easier... One interesting thing here is that across distances like this, there would be significant longitudal currents in such a shield. Not as bad as metal spanning the Mississippi, but getting there. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
You'd need a rather thick copper jacket to shield effectively against the 50Hz magnetic field. Bruce On Thursday, 25 August 2016 3:00 PM, André Esteves <aifeste...@gmail.com> wrote: So the way to eliminate that perturbation would be to put a copper jacket over it to attenuate the EM field? André Esteves 2016-08-25 0:33 GMT+01:00 Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz>: > The Kerr effect is Proportional to the square of the field so one would > expect a strong 100Hz component from this. > > The magneto optical Kerr eefect which rotates the plane of polarisation is > linear however. > > Bruce > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 07:04:31 AM Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would not rule out line noise into the electronic side of things. >> >> Bob >> >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Magnus Danielson > <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details > from >> > 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details >> > tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect >> > The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. >> > >> > Would be nice to verify it. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Magnus >> > >> >> On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: >> >> I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of >> >> 100 Hz. >> >> >> >> I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from >> >> magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends > on >> >> the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which > is >> >> why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits > with >> >> piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic >> >> field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does >> >> follow the sign. >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism >> >> >> >> I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic >> >> but maybe doping can make them susceptible? >> >> >> >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: >> >>> >> >>> What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz > disturbance? >> >>> DaveB, NZ >> >>> >> >>> - Original Message - >> >>> From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >> >>> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> >> >>> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM >> >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over > 1400 >> >>> km of fibre >> >>> >> >>>> ... >> >>>> >> >>>> These links is in principle not very complex, but they are > regardless >> >>>> somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz > disturbance, >> >>>> which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the > fibre >> >>>> was >> >>>> laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with > quite a bit >> >>>> of >> >>>> current in it. >> >>>> >> >>>> ... >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Magnus >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> >> To unsubscribe, go to >> >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> >> instructions there. >> > >> > ___ >> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> > To unsubscribe, go to >> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> > instructions there. >> >> ___ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> instructions there. > > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
So the way to eliminate that perturbation would be to put a copper jacket over it to attenuate the EM field? André Esteves 2016-08-25 0:33 GMT+01:00 Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz>: > The Kerr effect is Proportional to the square of the field so one would > expect a strong 100Hz component from this. > > The magneto optical Kerr eefect which rotates the plane of polarisation is > linear however. > > Bruce > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 07:04:31 AM Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would not rule out line noise into the electronic side of things. >> >> Bob >> >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Magnus Danielson > <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details > from >> > 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details >> > tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect >> > The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. >> > >> > Would be nice to verify it. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Magnus >> > >> >> On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: >> >> I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of >> >> 100 Hz. >> >> >> >> I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from >> >> magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends > on >> >> the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which > is >> >> why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits > with >> >> piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic >> >> field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does >> >> follow the sign. >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism >> >> >> >> I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic >> >> but maybe doping can make them susceptible? >> >> >> >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: >> >>> >> >>> What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz > disturbance? >> >>> DaveB, NZ >> >>> >> >>> - Original Message - >> >>> From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >> >>> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> >> >>> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM >> >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over > 1400 >> >>> km of fibre >> >>> >> >>>> ... >> >>>> >> >>>> These links is in principle not very complex, but they are > regardless >> >>>> somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz > disturbance, >> >>>> which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the > fibre >> >>>> was >> >>>> laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with > quite a bit >> >>>> of >> >>>> current in it. >> >>>> >> >>>> ... >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Magnus >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> >> To unsubscribe, go to >> >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> >> instructions there. >> > >> > ___ >> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> > To unsubscribe, go to >> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> > instructions there. >> >> ___ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the >> instructions there. > > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
The Kerr effect is Proportional to the square of the field so one would expect a strong 100Hz component from this. The magneto optical Kerr eefect which rotates the plane of polarisation is linear however. Bruce On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 07:04:31 AM Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > I would not rule out line noise into the electronic side of things. > > Bob > > > On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> > > wrote: > > > > Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details from > > 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details > > tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect > > The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. > > > > Would be nice to verify it. > > > > Cheers, > > Magnus > > > >> On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: > >> I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of > >> 100 Hz. > >> > >> I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from > >> magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends on > >> the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which is > >> why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits with > >> piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic > >> field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does > >> follow the sign. > >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism > >> > >> I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic > >> but maybe doping can make them susceptible? > >> > >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: > >>> > >>> What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? > >>> DaveB, NZ > >>> > >>> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> > >>> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> > >>> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM > >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 > >>> km of fibre > >>> > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless > >>>> somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, > >>>> which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre > >>>> was > >>>> laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit > >>>> of > >>>> current in it. > >>>> > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Magnus > >> > >> ___ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the > >> instructions there. > > > > ___ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the > > instructions there. > > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the > instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Hi I would not rule out line noise into the electronic side of things. Bob > On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> > wrote: > > Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details from > 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details > tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect > The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. > > Would be nice to verify it. > > Cheers, > Magnus > >> On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: >> I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of >> 100 Hz. >> >> I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from >> magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends on >> the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which is >> why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits with >> piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic >> field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does >> follow the sign. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism >> >> I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic >> but maybe doping can make them susceptible? >> >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: >>> >>> What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? >>> DaveB, NZ >>> >>> ----- Original Message - >>> From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >>> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> >>> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of >>> fibre >>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless >>>> somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, >>>> which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was >>>> laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of >>>> current in it. >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Magnus >> ___ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Don't over-interpret the 50 Hz aspect, I don't remember those details from 4.5 months back or so, as I already indicated. I can ask on the details tomorrow. I think they discussed the Kerr effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_effect The PTB folks asked me the same question essentially. Would be nice to verify it. Cheers, Magnus On 08/24/2016 12:11 AM, David wrote: I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of 100 Hz. I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends on the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which is why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits with piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does follow the sign. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic but maybe doping can make them susceptible? On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre ... These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of current in it. ... Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
I could not find it in the links but Magnus mentions 50 Hz instead of 100 Hz. I would expect a 100 Hz noise signal if it was vibration coupled from magnetostriction in a transformer; magnetostrictive strain depends on the magnitude of the magnetic field strength and not the sign which is why 50/60 Hz transformers hum at 100/120 Hz. 50 Hz however fits with piezomagnetism if the optical fiber was in an oscillating magnetic field and antiferromagnetic; for piezomagnetism, the strain does follow the sign. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism I do not know if optical fibers are even slightly antiferromagnetic but maybe doping can make them susceptible? On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:31:57 +1200, you wrote: >What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? >DaveB, NZ > >- Original Message - >From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> >To: <time-nuts@febo.com> >Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> >Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of >fibre > >> ... >> >> These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless >> somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, >> which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was >> laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of >> current in it. >> >> ... >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
I think they speculated in the Kerr effect, so that the voltage swings would modulate the fiber. I don't consider it verified, so I do not take cross-examination on it. I can ask thought. Cheers, Magnus On 08/23/2016 11:31 PM, Dave Brown wrote: What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre The presentations and posters at 8FSM and EFTF York have been interesting. The PTB link-end is even more stable than the clock, but only in frequency stability. More links is planned, among those between LNE-SYRTE at Paris Observatory and NPL outside London. Such links aid in the comparison of optical clocks, alongside the PTB portable optical clock, as various realizations of same and different species is realized by various labs. The inter-comparations will be important to narrow down the frequency relationships as well as iron out various systematic shifts of implementations. In the end, this is important as stepping stones towards the redefinition of the SI second in terms of optical clocks. The active damping being done is quite interesting, but the bandwidth allowed is limited by the length of the span due to the time-delay, so that makes the length of each span limited and inter-related to the bandwidth of compensation. These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of current in it. Fascinating stuff, and that they now can tie together labs for real is a real advancement. Many labs is doing it, and they have different approaches. Cheers, Magnus On 08/23/2016 01:04 AM, André Esteves wrote: Some interesting developments in european atomic clocks. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/aug/22/optical-link-connects-atomic-clocks-over-1400-nbsp-km-of-fibre http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12443 The time kept by atomic clocks in France and Germany has been compared for the first time using a new 1400 km optical-fibre link between labs in Paris and Braunschweig. Hailed as the first comparison of its kind made across an international border, the link has already shown that two of the most precise optical atomic clocks in Europe agree to within 5 × 10–17. The link is the first step towards a European network of optical clocks that will provide extremely stable and precise time signals for research in a number of scientific fields including fundamental physics, astrophysics and geosciences. An optical atomic clock works by keeping a laser in resonance with an electronic transition between energy levels in an atom or ion – with the "ticks" of the clock being the frequency of the laser light. As with any clock, it is important to be able to compare the frequencies of two or more instruments to ensure that they are working as expected. Comparisons are also important for basic research, particularly for testing the fundamental physical laws and constants that are involved in the operation of atomic clocks. Both of the clocks are based on the same optical transition in strontium atoms, which are held in optical lattices created by laser light. The clock at the LNE-SYRTE laboratory in Paris operates at an uncertainty of about 4.1 × 10–17 and the clock at the PTB Braunschweig laboratory at 1.8 × 10–17. Gravitational shift If they were side by side, the clocks would tick at exactly the same frequency. However, there is a 25 m difference in the elevation between the two locations, which means that the Earth's gravitational field is not the same for both clocks – causing them to tick at slightly different frequencies. This gravitational redshift was confirmed by the link, which can detect differences in elevation as small as 5 m. The link comprises two commercial-grade optical fibres that run between Paris and Braunschweig. The route is not the shortest distance between the two clocks, but rather takes a significant southward detour via Strasbourg on the French–German border. For every 1020 photons that begin the journey, only one would arrive at its destination. This 200 dB attenuation is compensated for by 10 or so special amplifiers along the route. The German portion of the link runs 710 km from Braunschweig to Strasbourg and is dedicated to connecting the clocks. The French portion, however, uses 705 km of an active telecommunications link that also carries Internet traffic. As a result, two different approaches were needed to amplify the clock signals on either side of the border. Second connection The optical clock at PTB Braunschwe
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
tract...@ihug.co.nz said: > What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? My guess would be mechanical. Maybe from a nearby transformer. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
What is the coupling mechanism giving rise to the 50Hz disturbance? DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Magnus Danielson" <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <mag...@rubidium.se> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre The presentations and posters at 8FSM and EFTF York have been interesting. The PTB link-end is even more stable than the clock, but only in frequency stability. More links is planned, among those between LNE-SYRTE at Paris Observatory and NPL outside London. Such links aid in the comparison of optical clocks, alongside the PTB portable optical clock, as various realizations of same and different species is realized by various labs. The inter-comparations will be important to narrow down the frequency relationships as well as iron out various systematic shifts of implementations. In the end, this is important as stepping stones towards the redefinition of the SI second in terms of optical clocks. The active damping being done is quite interesting, but the bandwidth allowed is limited by the length of the span due to the time-delay, so that makes the length of each span limited and inter-related to the bandwidth of compensation. These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of current in it. Fascinating stuff, and that they now can tie together labs for real is a real advancement. Many labs is doing it, and they have different approaches. Cheers, Magnus On 08/23/2016 01:04 AM, André Esteves wrote: Some interesting developments in european atomic clocks. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/aug/22/optical-link-connects-atomic-clocks-over-1400-nbsp-km-of-fibre http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12443 The time kept by atomic clocks in France and Germany has been compared for the first time using a new 1400 km optical-fibre link between labs in Paris and Braunschweig. Hailed as the first comparison of its kind made across an international border, the link has already shown that two of the most precise optical atomic clocks in Europe agree to within 5 × 10–17. The link is the first step towards a European network of optical clocks that will provide extremely stable and precise time signals for research in a number of scientific fields including fundamental physics, astrophysics and geosciences. An optical atomic clock works by keeping a laser in resonance with an electronic transition between energy levels in an atom or ion – with the "ticks" of the clock being the frequency of the laser light. As with any clock, it is important to be able to compare the frequencies of two or more instruments to ensure that they are working as expected. Comparisons are also important for basic research, particularly for testing the fundamental physical laws and constants that are involved in the operation of atomic clocks. Both of the clocks are based on the same optical transition in strontium atoms, which are held in optical lattices created by laser light. The clock at the LNE-SYRTE laboratory in Paris operates at an uncertainty of about 4.1 × 10–17 and the clock at the PTB Braunschweig laboratory at 1.8 × 10–17. Gravitational shift If they were side by side, the clocks would tick at exactly the same frequency. However, there is a 25 m difference in the elevation between the two locations, which means that the Earth's gravitational field is not the same for both clocks – causing them to tick at slightly different frequencies. This gravitational redshift was confirmed by the link, which can detect differences in elevation as small as 5 m. The link comprises two commercial-grade optical fibres that run between Paris and Braunschweig. The route is not the shortest distance between the two clocks, but rather takes a significant southward detour via Strasbourg on the French–German border. For every 1020 photons that begin the journey, only one would arrive at its destination. This 200 dB attenuation is compensated for by 10 or so special amplifiers along the route. The German portion of the link runs 710 km from Braunschweig to Strasbourg and is dedicated to connecting the clocks. The French portion, however, uses 705 km of an active telecommunications link that also carries Internet traffic. As a result, two different approaches were needed to amplify the clock signals on either side of the border. Second connection The optical clock at PTB Braunschweig is already linked to the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics (MPQ) in Garching near Munich. This is done via a 920 km pair of optical fibres, and researchers at the MPQ plan to use the clock signal to make extre
Re: [time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
The presentations and posters at 8FSM and EFTF York have been interesting. The PTB link-end is even more stable than the clock, but only in frequency stability. More links is planned, among those between LNE-SYRTE at Paris Observatory and NPL outside London. Such links aid in the comparison of optical clocks, alongside the PTB portable optical clock, as various realizations of same and different species is realized by various labs. The inter-comparations will be important to narrow down the frequency relationships as well as iron out various systematic shifts of implementations. In the end, this is important as stepping stones towards the redefinition of the SI second in terms of optical clocks. The active damping being done is quite interesting, but the bandwidth allowed is limited by the length of the span due to the time-delay, so that makes the length of each span limited and inter-related to the bandwidth of compensation. These links is in principle not very complex, but they are regardless somewhat sensitive. One link experienced excessive 50 Hz disturbance, which they could trace to the fact that for a short distance the fibre was laying alongside the house 400V three-phase feed-cable with quite a bit of current in it. Fascinating stuff, and that they now can tie together labs for real is a real advancement. Many labs is doing it, and they have different approaches. Cheers, Magnus On 08/23/2016 01:04 AM, André Esteves wrote: Some interesting developments in european atomic clocks. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/aug/22/optical-link-connects-atomic-clocks-over-1400-nbsp-km-of-fibre http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12443 The time kept by atomic clocks in France and Germany has been compared for the first time using a new 1400 km optical-fibre link between labs in Paris and Braunschweig. Hailed as the first comparison of its kind made across an international border, the link has already shown that two of the most precise optical atomic clocks in Europe agree to within 5 × 10–17. The link is the first step towards a European network of optical clocks that will provide extremely stable and precise time signals for research in a number of scientific fields including fundamental physics, astrophysics and geosciences. An optical atomic clock works by keeping a laser in resonance with an electronic transition between energy levels in an atom or ion – with the "ticks" of the clock being the frequency of the laser light. As with any clock, it is important to be able to compare the frequencies of two or more instruments to ensure that they are working as expected. Comparisons are also important for basic research, particularly for testing the fundamental physical laws and constants that are involved in the operation of atomic clocks. Both of the clocks are based on the same optical transition in strontium atoms, which are held in optical lattices created by laser light. The clock at the LNE-SYRTE laboratory in Paris operates at an uncertainty of about 4.1 × 10–17 and the clock at the PTB Braunschweig laboratory at 1.8 × 10–17. Gravitational shift If they were side by side, the clocks would tick at exactly the same frequency. However, there is a 25 m difference in the elevation between the two locations, which means that the Earth's gravitational field is not the same for both clocks – causing them to tick at slightly different frequencies. This gravitational redshift was confirmed by the link, which can detect differences in elevation as small as 5 m. The link comprises two commercial-grade optical fibres that run between Paris and Braunschweig. The route is not the shortest distance between the two clocks, but rather takes a significant southward detour via Strasbourg on the French–German border. For every 1020 photons that begin the journey, only one would arrive at its destination. This 200 dB attenuation is compensated for by 10 or so special amplifiers along the route. The German portion of the link runs 710 km from Braunschweig to Strasbourg and is dedicated to connecting the clocks. The French portion, however, uses 705 km of an active telecommunications link that also carries Internet traffic. As a result, two different approaches were needed to amplify the clock signals on either side of the border. Second connection The optical clock at PTB Braunschweig is already linked to the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics (MPQ) in Garching near Munich. This is done via a 920 km pair of optical fibres, and researchers at the MPQ plan to use the clock signal to make extremely precise spectroscopy measurements. A further expansion of this network would provide researchers in other labs in Europe with access to high-precision clock signals. Applications could include measuring a fundamental physics constant in several different locations – to confirm that the value of the constant is indeed constant. Other possible uses include precision measurements in
[time-nuts] Optical link connects atomic clocks over 1400 km of fibre
Some interesting developments in european atomic clocks. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/aug/22/optical-link-connects-atomic-clocks-over-1400-nbsp-km-of-fibre http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12443 The time kept by atomic clocks in France and Germany has been compared for the first time using a new 1400 km optical-fibre link between labs in Paris and Braunschweig. Hailed as the first comparison of its kind made across an international border, the link has already shown that two of the most precise optical atomic clocks in Europe agree to within 5 × 10–17. The link is the first step towards a European network of optical clocks that will provide extremely stable and precise time signals for research in a number of scientific fields including fundamental physics, astrophysics and geosciences. An optical atomic clock works by keeping a laser in resonance with an electronic transition between energy levels in an atom or ion – with the "ticks" of the clock being the frequency of the laser light. As with any clock, it is important to be able to compare the frequencies of two or more instruments to ensure that they are working as expected. Comparisons are also important for basic research, particularly for testing the fundamental physical laws and constants that are involved in the operation of atomic clocks. Both of the clocks are based on the same optical transition in strontium atoms, which are held in optical lattices created by laser light. The clock at the LNE-SYRTE laboratory in Paris operates at an uncertainty of about 4.1 × 10–17 and the clock at the PTB Braunschweig laboratory at 1.8 × 10–17. Gravitational shift If they were side by side, the clocks would tick at exactly the same frequency. However, there is a 25 m difference in the elevation between the two locations, which means that the Earth's gravitational field is not the same for both clocks – causing them to tick at slightly different frequencies. This gravitational redshift was confirmed by the link, which can detect differences in elevation as small as 5 m. The link comprises two commercial-grade optical fibres that run between Paris and Braunschweig. The route is not the shortest distance between the two clocks, but rather takes a significant southward detour via Strasbourg on the French–German border. For every 1020 photons that begin the journey, only one would arrive at its destination. This 200 dB attenuation is compensated for by 10 or so special amplifiers along the route. The German portion of the link runs 710 km from Braunschweig to Strasbourg and is dedicated to connecting the clocks. The French portion, however, uses 705 km of an active telecommunications link that also carries Internet traffic. As a result, two different approaches were needed to amplify the clock signals on either side of the border. Second connection The optical clock at PTB Braunschweig is already linked to the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics (MPQ) in Garching near Munich. This is done via a 920 km pair of optical fibres, and researchers at the MPQ plan to use the clock signal to make extremely precise spectroscopy measurements. A further expansion of this network would provide researchers in other labs in Europe with access to high-precision clock signals. Applications could include measuring a fundamental physics constant in several different locations – to confirm that the value of the constant is indeed constant. Other possible uses include precision measurements in spectroscopy that look for evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model and making very precise measurements of the shape and density of the Earth. The construction and testing of the link are described in Nature Communications. About the author Hamish Johnston is editor of physicsworld.com ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.