RE: Tomcat 5 JBoss

2003-10-29 Thread Greg_Cope
Remy,

I know this is off topic for this list, but:

Does it need to be this complex to bundle them both - the instructions seem
to have disappeared off the Jbos site - do I have to buy a book to find out?

The reason I/we have issues is that we have to do extensive documentation
and qualification for regulatory reasons (believe me this is in depth and
involves evidence gathering to prove and idiot can install something and
prove they have crossed the T's)

We hence standardise on a tomcat version and go with that - if we want to
use Jboss we sometimes choose a different tomcat version and this causes
problems.

Having to document a tomcat/jboss bundled build on top of what we do would
be a royal PITA.

Sorry, off topic rant over.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 28 October 2003 17:24
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 5  JBoss
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Is there any way to run JBoss with Tomcat 5 instead of 4.1.27?
  I'm using JBoss 3.2.2.
  
  
  I would like to switch to 5 because of the hotswap 
 debugging feature.
 
 You have to get the source, and build. There will be a TC 5 
 SAR in the 
 output dir for the Tomcat module.
 
 Using it is not straightforward, though:
 - you have to replace the servlet  JSP API JARs in lib
 - you should add commons-logging to your system classpath to 
 avoid problems
 
 -- 
 x
 Rémy Maucherat
 Senior Developer  Consultant
 JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
 x
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat 5 JBoss

2003-10-29 Thread Greg_Cope
 From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 29 October 2003 12:55
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 5  JBoss
 
 
 Actualy Jboss specifically doesn't give out much info for the 
 purpose of
 making money.  That is how they are funded.  You don't have 
 to pay squat
 for their software, you just have to pay for support and 
 documentation.
 They sell documentation.  So, It would probably be good of you...since
 you are using Jboss to make money (it sounds like it) to use their
 methods and buy the support and documents.
 
 Wade

Wade,

We do not use Jboss at present.  I was just commenting on one of the reasons
why it would be complex to intergrate and document/qualify it into our
environment.

Greg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat 5 JBoss

2003-10-29 Thread Greg_Cope
s'okay :-)

I can understand their motives and good luck to them.  I also whole
heartedly support open source software, and promote it where I can.


Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 29 October 2003 18:03
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Tomcat 5  JBoss
 
 
 In reading what I wrote I didn't mean it to sound the way it obviously
 sounds.  So, I offer apologies for the way I wrote that.  I 
 should have
 took time to think about the way it was written before sending it.
 
 Wade
 

 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: building mod_jk from source - TO GREG -

2003-10-23 Thread Greg_Cope
Hiya tino,

Sorry do not recognise the error.  You need to dig deeper to see if you can
spot the syntax error.

Did you complie apache as the same user (and hence probably the same path).

Although I cannot help much as I have not seen this problem I have had many
problems compling BSD/GNU/Free Software on Solaris with the Sun tools.  The
best bet is to install all the GNU tools and reconfigure your path to match.
Often these are path/tools issues.

If is often easier to use Free|OpenBSD|Linux to get this stuff to work
but that is a different story.

Does that help?

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 22 October 2003 12:12
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: building mod_jk from source - TO GREG -
 
 
 Hi Greg,
 
 i am using make, version: GNU MAKE 3.80
 -?? i don't know, if apache was compiled with sun's cc/make/automake
 
 helps you to make conclusions?
 
 regards, 
 tino
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: building mod_jk from source

2003-10-22 Thread Greg_Cope
Jusy a thought;

What varients of automake/cc/make are you using?  Was apache complied with
sun's cc/make/automake and you are using GNU's?

Greg


 
 Hi , dear community
 
 i am fixing slowly my bugs with your help!.  This mailing 
 list works fine.
 
 I want to build my own mod_jk from source for solaris.
 
 I have a new problem while trying to run the command make 
 (after I did: 
 ./configure -with-apxs=APACHE_HOME/bin/apxs). 
 
 I receive this message:
 /bin/bash ./config.status --recheck
 running /bin/bash ./configure  --with-apxs=/opt/apache-1.3.27-2002-12-
 14/bin/apxs  --no-create --no-recursion
 ./configure: line 1261: syntax error near unexpected token 
 `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
 (${PACKAGE},'
 ./configure: line 1261: `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(${PACKAGE}, ${VERSION})'
 
 
 After this i cann see only links of mod_jk.so under apache1.3/ 
 mod_jk.so - mod_jk.so.0.0.0
 mod_jk.so.0 - mod_jk.so.0.0.0
 
 
 Any idea to fix this? 
 
 
 best regards, 
 tino
 
 -
 This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: jk2 connector with apache 1.3 ?

2003-10-21 Thread Greg_Cope
Yes it can!

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 21 October 2003 10:12
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: jk2 connector with apache 1.3 ? 
 
 
 Hi there, 
 
 i have only one question, 
 do you know if the jk2 connector can also be connected with 
 apache 1.3 ? 
 
 
 regards, 
 tino
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: cannot build jk on solaris

2003-10-21 Thread Greg_Cope
You need to autoconf tools etc.. to make a configure script (it is not there
by default).

I think one of the README's or other files explain this.

Probably best to download a binary from the apache site.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 20 October 2003 14:20
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: cannot build jk on solaris
 
 
 hi
 
 I want to build jk2 from source, but i only can run the 
 ./configure command.  
 when i type make nothing hapens.  I only can see the 
 mod_jk2.c and mod_jk2.dsp 
 on apache13.  But noting about mod_jk.so
 
 
 regards, 
 
 Tino
 
 -
 This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

2003-10-09 Thread Greg_Cope
Hi All,

Can anyone recommend an FAQ or quide for this on mod_jk2?

Many thanks,

Greg Cope
GCS Ltd
Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG
Phone: (44) 01304 642040
Fax: (44) 01304 652118

LEGAL NOTICE
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended for the addresee(s) only. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure
or copying of the contents of this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken)
in reliance on it is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
 
Pfizer Limited is registered in England under No. 526209 with its registered
office at Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

2003-10-09 Thread Greg_Cope
Thanks Nathan,

Already found that - and it's for mod_jk not jk2 and the 2 are slightly
different.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Nathan Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 09 October 2003 17:06
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ 
 
 
 Although this is for Linux, here is an Article that might 
 help you get started:
 
 http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/index.html
 
 
 -- Nathan Christiansen
Tahitian Noni International
http://www.tahitiannoni.com
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

2003-10-09 Thread Greg_Cope
Thanks Tim,

Seen those - We've got it working, but I was looking for more info about the
jkstatus output and the jk log output when the logging level is turned up.

I'll need to dig out the source code and have a read

Thanks,

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 09 October 2003 17:17
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ
 
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/connectors.html
 
 Google for tomcat faq jk2 yields this as the first page.
 
 -Tim
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi All,
  
  Can anyone recommend an FAQ or quide for this on mod_jk2?
  
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

2003-10-06 Thread Greg_Cope
 
 Howdy,
 Also keep in mind that 4.1.28, like any other release, could have
 regression bugs ;)  You'd have to test on it anyhow before going to
 production and finishing documentation.  Unless you really need a fix
 from 4.1.27, you could just stick to 4.1.24 without a hotfix.

I can appreciate that - I always wait a while before jumping on the next
release.  We also do extensive testing, and then ask the business to test on
a developement environment and finally do the documentation and release to
production under change management.  This is in all quite allot of work, and
is not as simplistic as untaring tomcat, throwing some wars in and checking
that they work ;-)

We did all the above with 4.1.24 but it has a bug with at least one of our
apps (to do with posted XML - although this may be the app not tomcat) -
4.1.27 works, so we need to start the process again :-( 

Thanks,

Greg

 
 Yoav Shapira
 Millennium ChemInformatics
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:39 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?
 
 Thanks :-)
 
 I know about when its ready, but some people in the know have a
 feeling
 for when it is nearly ready as opposed to not quite.
 
 I am presently facing issues with posted xml data in 4.1.24, and am
 considering moving to 4.1.27, but the hotfix is apparently in the
 future
 4.1.28.
 
 As I have to document everything, I would prefer to use 4.1.28, as
 installing the hotfix is extra (documentation) work.
 
 Just trying to plan ahead and see if anyone had an idea ;-)
 
 I'll go back to lurking.
 
 Greg
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Marcel Stor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 03 October 2003 12:00
  To: 'Tomcat Users List'
  Subject: AW: Expected date for 4.1.28?
 
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi All,
  
   Anyone got an expected date (roughly) for the above?
 
  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/version.html#when
 
  Regards,
  Marcel
 
 
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential 
 business communication, and may contain information that is 
 confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is 
 intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, 
 and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
 anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, 
 please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer 
 system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Expected date for 4.1.28?

2003-10-03 Thread Greg_Cope
Hi All,

Anyone got an expected date (roughly) for the above?

Ta.

Greg Cope
GCS Ltd
Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG
Phone: (44) 01304 642040
Fax: (44) 01304 652118

LEGAL NOTICE
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended for the addresee(s) only. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure
or copying of the contents of this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken)
in reliance on it is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
 
Pfizer Limited is registered in England under No. 526209 with its registered
office at Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

2003-10-03 Thread Greg_Cope
Thanks :-)

I know about when its ready, but some people in the know have a feeling
for when it is nearly ready as opposed to not quite.

I am presently facing issues with posted xml data in 4.1.24, and am
considering moving to 4.1.27, but the hotfix is apparently in the future
4.1.28.

As I have to document everything, I would prefer to use 4.1.28, as
installing the hotfix is extra (documentation) work.

Just trying to plan ahead and see if anyone had an idea ;-)

I'll go back to lurking.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: Marcel Stor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 03 October 2003 12:00
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: AW: Expected date for 4.1.28?
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  Anyone got an expected date (roughly) for the above?
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/version.html#when
 
 Regards,
 Marcel
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

2003-10-03 Thread Greg_Cope
Thanks Tim,

Just what I wanted!

If it is this close, then I will wait a while to see if it does come out
soon, and then assuming it is not a brown paper bag release

I have to arrange change control, and install qualification docs etc ... so
we tend to do this infrequently if we can.

Thanks

Greg


 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 03 October 2003 12:56
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Expected date for 4.1.28?
 
 
 See the tomcat-dev archives. Occasionally, wishful release 
 dates pop up from 
 time to time ...
 
 For example:
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=106485028613397w=2
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]