Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
Hello, Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44 Can't startup JVM exit -1 message... Compiled jni*.so and maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used? I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm... Greetings and thanks Peter _ Fotos - MSN Fotos das virtuelle Fotoalbum. Allen Freunden zeigen oder einfach online entwickeln lassen: http://photos.msn.de/support/worldwide.aspx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote: Hello, Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44 Can't startup JVM exit -1 message... I tried this setup a couple days ago (on Redhat 8.0) and it worked fine, but I am using the mod_jk.so connector. I have not tried the JNI approach. I did notice my applications ran much slower than under the Sun 1.4.1 (both _01 and _02 versions) so I went back to the Sun jdk (despite reports of StringBuffer related memory leaks). I am now on the Apache 2.0.45 and it is working fine. Compiled jni*.so and maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used? I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm... Greetings and thanks Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't You know about this rumor? Thanks From: Richard Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:45:37 -0700 On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote: Hello, Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44 Can't startup JVM exit -1 message... I tried this setup a couple days ago (on Redhat 8.0) and it worked fine, but I am using the mod_jk.so connector. I have not tried the JNI approach. I did notice my applications ran much slower than under the Sun 1.4.1 (both _01 and _02 versions) so I went back to the Sun jdk (despite reports of StringBuffer related memory leaks). I am now on the Apache 2.0.45 and it is working fine. Compiled jni*.so and maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used? I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm... Greetings and thanks Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Hotmail - Absolut kostenfrei! Der weltweit größte E-Mail-Anbieter im Netz: http://www.msn.de/hotmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:00, Peter H. wrote: Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't You know about this rumor? It has been 1 year since I last used Debian, so I am not aware of this rumor. I hope it is not the case. I have been using the above configuration (except NOT as JNI) on Redhat 8, and SUSE 8 and have had no problems. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
I've always used the Blackdown JVM on Debian. But I use it sporadically so I can't say I'm up to date on it or any other JVMs for Debian. But I know I chose it for a reason, probably because the Debian Users List recommended it. I'm sure you'd get a quick answer on the Debian User list. -Original Message- From: Richard Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:00, Peter H. wrote: Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't You know about this rumor? It has been 1 year since I last used Debian, so I am not aware of this rumor. I hope it is not the case. I have been using the above configuration (except NOT as JNI) on Redhat 8, and SUSE 8 and have had no problems. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:46, Richard Dunn wrote: On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:00, Peter H. wrote: Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't You know about this rumor? It has been 1 year since I last used Debian, so I am not aware of this rumor. I hope it is not the case. I have been using the above configuration (except NOT as JNI) on Redhat 8, and SUSE 8 and have had no problems. Whoops. Clarification needed - other than JNI the above worked for me, except I went back to the Sun j2sdk1.4.1_02 for performance reasons. The functionality seemed to be fine on the IBM, just slower. My applications use a lot of XML, but I don't seem to have noticeable problems with the memory leaks I see reported on the Sun 1.4.1 JDK . I may not have the number of hits on my applications to cause the problems, although at least one of my sites gets 5000 hits per day, all processing XML. I am suprised with the relative slower performance of the IBM JDK 1.4.0 as the IBM 1.3 JDK seemed to be faster than Sun's 1.3 for my applications. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
And you should upgrade to apache 2.0.45 anyways, since there is apparently a un-announced security problem that was fixed. On Thursday 03 April 2003 07:45 am, Richard Dunn wrote: On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote: Hello, Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44 Can't startup JVM exit -1 message... I tried this setup a couple days ago (on Redhat 8.0) and it worked fine, but I am using the mod_jk.so connector. I have not tried the JNI approach. I did notice my applications ran much slower than under the Sun 1.4.1 (both _01 and _02 versions) so I went back to the Sun jdk (despite reports of StringBuffer related memory leaks). I am now on the Apache 2.0.45 and it is working fine. Compiled jni*.so and maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used? I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm... Greetings and thanks Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Michael Crozier Conducive Technology Corporation First we were Sight Sound, then we were Datalex, and temporarily Framework Technology. http://www.conducivetech.com Michael Crozier, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 503.445.4233 Fax: 503.274.0939 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess
I use Sun's JDK 1.4.01 on Debian without any problems (so far). On Thursday 03 April 2003 09:00 am, Peter H. wrote: Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't You know about this rumor? Thanks From: Richard Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI inprocess Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:45:37 -0700 On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote: Hello, Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44 Can't startup JVM exit -1 message... I tried this setup a couple days ago (on Redhat 8.0) and it worked fine, but I am using the mod_jk.so connector. I have not tried the JNI approach. I did notice my applications ran much slower than under the Sun 1.4.1 (both _01 and _02 versions) so I went back to the Sun jdk (despite reports of StringBuffer related memory leaks). I am now on the Apache 2.0.45 and it is working fine. Compiled jni*.so and maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used? I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm... Greetings and thanks Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Hotmail - Absolut kostenfrei! Der weltweit größte E-Mail-Anbieter im Netz: http://www.msn.de/hotmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Michael Crozier Conducive Technology Corporation First we were Sight Sound, then we were Datalex, and temporarily Framework Technology. http://www.conducivetech.com Michael Crozier, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 503.445.4233 Fax: 503.274.0939 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
