subject:"ONE More Time\! why does Tomcat 4 work this way"

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-08 Thread Brian Adams


Since then I have left all my WebApp module information in my config files
but I then installed good old mod_jk and it works fine with mod_jk.  I left
all the webapp stuff so I could replace the module and warp jar at a later
date when it is configured correctly.



-Original Message-
From: William Tansill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Yes, I'm getting the same "reset by peer" errors, as well as socket
exceptions.  I have no explanation.  I'm new to the community as well, so I
don't have a lot of experience in this area.  My setup:

Apache 1.3.22
Tomcat 4.01
mod_webapp.so (and the .dll file required by Windows) in the directory
d:\program files\apache group\apache\modules
Windows 98 running on an old Pentium (but same problems on a different Win2k
box)
Server.xml has not been altered
Httpd.conf has a virtual host section where the connector info is defined
 see below)


   ServerName www.servlets.com
   DocumentRoot "d:/Program Files/Apache Tomcat 4.0/webapps/ROOT/"

   WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
   WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples


The hosts file has been edited to include the IP address and server name
since I'm not running DNS

environment variables are:

SET CATALINA_HOME=D:\Program Files\Apache Tomcat 4.0\
SET JAVA_HOME=D:\JDK1.3.1

Apache talks to TC just fine, but, as you note, after a certain number of
attempts, socket errors proliferate, and the only solution is to shut down
Tomcat and restart it.

-Original Message-
From: Sri K Ganjam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Hi,
I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop, I
downloaded from here
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
every 3-4 request)
Does any one else faced the same problems?
Thanks and Regards,
Sri K Ganjam
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> &

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-08 Thread William Tansill


Yes, I'm getting the same "reset by peer" errors, as well as socket
exceptions.  I have no explanation.  I'm new to the community as well, so I
don't have a lot of experience in this area.  My setup:

Apache 1.3.22
Tomcat 4.01
mod_webapp.so (and the .dll file required by Windows) in the directory
d:\program files\apache group\apache\modules
Windows 98 running on an old Pentium (but same problems on a different Win2k
box)
Server.xml has not been altered
Httpd.conf has a virtual host section where the connector info is defined
 see below)


   ServerName www.servlets.com
   DocumentRoot "d:/Program Files/Apache Tomcat 4.0/webapps/ROOT/"

   WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
   WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples


The hosts file has been edited to include the IP address and server name
since I'm not running DNS

environment variables are:

SET CATALINA_HOME=D:\Program Files\Apache Tomcat 4.0\
SET JAVA_HOME=D:\JDK1.3.1

Apache talks to TC just fine, but, as you note, after a certain number of
attempts, socket errors proliferate, and the only solution is to shut down
Tomcat and restart it.

-Original Message-
From: Sri K Ganjam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Hi,
I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop, I
downloaded from here
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
every 3-4 request)
Does any one else faced the same problems?
Thanks and Regards,
Sri K Ganjam
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-07 Thread Brian Adams


OKay, I left my webapp config in and added jk_mod.  jk_mod works like a
champ!  I will press on with this and watch webapp to see if it dies or
lives.
Thanks for the email attachment that worked well.
B

-Original Message-
From: Lauer, Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:31 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: AW: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Maybe you try mod_jk for Linux due to I had the same comparable problems
with Solaris 2.6. You can easily built it from source using the mail
attached.
Oliver


> AXA eSolutions GmbH
> AXA Konzern AG Germany
> Oliver Lauer 
> Web Architect
> Wörthstraße 34
> D-50668 Köln
> Germany
> Tel.: +49 221 148 31277
> Fax: +49 221 148 43963
> Mobil: +49 179 59 064 59
> e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sri K Ganjam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2001 07:08
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Hi,
I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop, I
downloaded from here
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
every 3-4 request)
Does any one else faced the same problems?
Thanks and Regards,
Sri K Ganjam
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does n

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-07 Thread David Smith


The mod_webapp material found their might be fairly old.  I haven't looked in 
a while, so I can't say with any certainty.  I downloaded source for 
mod_webapp from the following page:

http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier/snapshots/

It has nightly packages complete with all that's needed to build mod_webapp.  
My build of it on Mandrake 8 has worked flawlessly.  I do recommend you build 
the warp.jar file and replace it in Tomcat at the same time you're replacing 
mod_webapp.so since there are some fixes in both files.

--David

On Friday 07 December 2001 01:08 am, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
> improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
> under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop,
> I downloaded from here
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
> but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
> 1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
> takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
> 2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
> every 3-4 request)
> Does any one else faced the same problems?
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sri K Ganjam
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
> > clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull
> > the latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked
> > the dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I
> > don't
>
> know
>
> > who...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> > > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> >
> > this.
> >
> > > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> >
> > mod_jk
> >
> > > *point*
> > > B
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
>
> need
>
> > > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested.
> > > AFAIK, there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he
> > > was
> >
> > taking
> >
> > > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> >
> > where
> >
> > > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
>
> included
>
> > > in server.xml.
> > >
> > > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
>
> see
>
> > > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> > >
> > > Your call...
> > >
> > > --jeff
> > >
> > > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> >
> > publicfile)
> >
> > > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the
> > > dynamic stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
>

AW: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-07 Thread Lauer, Oliver


Maybe you try mod_jk for Linux due to I had the same comparable problems
with Solaris 2.6. You can easily built it from source using the mail
attached.
Oliver


> AXA eSolutions GmbH
> AXA Konzern AG Germany
> Oliver Lauer 
> Web Architect
> Wörthstraße 34
> D-50668 Köln
> Germany
> Tel.: +49 221 148 31277
> Fax: +49 221 148 43963
> Mobil: +49 179 59 064 59
> e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sri K Ganjam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2001 07:08
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Hi,
I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop, I
downloaded from here
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
every 3-4 request)
Does any one else faced the same problems?
Thanks and Regards,
Sri K Ganjam
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> > images
> > > also!
> > > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
> directly
> > > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
> about
> > > the same problem...
> > > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > > B
> > >
> > > -Origina

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-07 Thread Sri K Ganjam


Hi,
I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop, I
downloaded from here
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
every 3-4 request)
Does any one else faced the same problems?
Thanks and Regards,
Sri K Ganjam
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> > images
> > > also!
> > > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
> directly
> > > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
> about
> > > the same problem...
> > > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > > B
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your
webapp
> is
> > > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
> This
> > > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > > mod_webapp, though.
> > >
> > >

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Jeff Kilbride


I believe it's in the jakarta-tomcat-connectors module.

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> > images
> > > also!
> > > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
> directly
> > > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
> about
> > > the same problem...
> > > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > > B
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your
webapp
> is
> > > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
> This
> > > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > > mod_webapp, though.
> > >
> > > --jeff
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> > that
> > > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > > any hints?
> > > >

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Tom Parker


> What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp is
> rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path. This
> is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> mod_webapp, though.

"./images/butterfly.jpg" would work better.

if you reference ./images from a file in ., then the browser should sort out
the url... Check the access log for the actual URL's that the browser is
requesting.


--
To unsubscribe:   
For additional commands: 
Troubles with the list:

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module




-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't know
who...

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
this.
>
> Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
mod_jk
> *point*
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
> to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
taking
> a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
where
> he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
> in server.xml.
>
> Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
> all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
>
> Your call...
>
> --jeff
>
> P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
publicfile)
> to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> images
> > also!
> > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
directly
> > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
about
> > the same problem...
> > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp
is
> > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
This
> > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > mod_webapp, though.
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> that
> > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > any hints?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > have you tried the following:
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Carsten
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > my jsp page has this image:
> > > 
> &g

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


cool! I will try that before I turn, run and cry like a little girl!
:)
average response time must get faster!


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't know
who...

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
this.
>
> Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
mod_jk
> *point*
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
> to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
taking
> a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
where
> he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
> in server.xml.
>
> Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
> all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
>
> Your call...
>
> --jeff
>
> P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
publicfile)
> to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> images
> > also!
> > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
directly
> > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
about
> > the same problem...
> > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp
is
> > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
This
> > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > mod_webapp, though.
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> that
> > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > any hints?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > have you tried the following:
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Carsten
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > my

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Jeff Kilbride


Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't know
who...

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
this.
>
> Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
mod_jk
> *point*
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
> to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
taking
> a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
where
> he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
> in server.xml.
>
> Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
> all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
>
> Your call...
>
> --jeff
>
> P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
publicfile)
> to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> images
> > also!
> > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
directly
> > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
about
> > the same problem...
> > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp
is
> > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
This
> > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > mod_webapp, though.
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> that
> > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > any hints?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > have you tried the following:
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Carsten
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > my jsp page has this image:
> > > 
> > > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The
jsp
> > page
> > > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> > >
> > > If I change it to:
> > > http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg"

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Jeff Kilbride


Dude, you're watching this list WAY too closely! You're average response
time is 2.5 minutes...

:)

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
this.
>
> Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
mod_jk
> *point*
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
> to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
taking
> a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
where
> he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
> in server.xml.
>
> Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
> all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
>
> Your call...
>
> --jeff
>
> P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
publicfile)
> to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> images
> > also!
> > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
directly
> > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
about
> > the same problem...
> > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > B
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp
is
> > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
This
> > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > mod_webapp, though.
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> that
> > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > any hints?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > have you tried the following:
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Carsten
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > my jsp page has this image:
> > > 
> > > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The
jsp
> > page
> > > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> > >
> > > If I change it to:
> > > http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It
> works
> > > fine and fast!
> > >
> > > WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
> >

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at this.

Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to mod_jk
*point*
B

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was taking
a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up where
he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
in server.xml.

Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
all relate to problems with mod_webapp.

Your call...

--jeff

P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's publicfile)
to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...


- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I tried that and it does not work either.
> I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
images
> also!
> This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat directly
> 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking about
> the same problem...
> Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp is
> rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path. This
> is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> mod_webapp, though.
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
that
> > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > any hints?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > have you tried the following:
> >
> > 
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > my jsp page has this image:
> > 
> > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp
> page
> > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> >
> > If I change it to:
> > http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It
works
> > fine and fast!
> >
> > WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
> >
> > my warp definition is:
> > everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> > WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> > WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> > WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
> >
> > Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
> > images folder?
> >
> > B
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Jeff Kilbride


Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really need
to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was taking
a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up where
he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already included
in server.xml.

Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I see
all relate to problems with mod_webapp.

Your call...

--jeff

P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's publicfile)
to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...


- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> I tried that and it does not work either.
> I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
images
> also!
> This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat directly
> 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking about
> the same problem...
> Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp is
> rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path. This
> is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> mod_webapp, though.
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
that
> > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > any hints?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > have you tried the following:
> >
> > 
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > my jsp page has this image:
> > 
> > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp
> page
> > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> >
> > If I change it to:
> > http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It
works
> > fine and fast!
> >
> > WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
> >
> > my warp definition is:
> > everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> > WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> > WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> > WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
> >
> > Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
> > images folder?
> >
> > B
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


I tried that and it does not work either.
I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the images
also!
This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat directly
8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking about
the same problem...
Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
B 

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp is
rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path. This
is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
mod_webapp, though.

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0 that
> make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> any hints?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> have you tried the following:
>
> 
>
> Carsten
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> my jsp page has this image:
> 
> The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp
page
> WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
>
> If I change it to:
> http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
> fine and fast!
>
> WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
>
> my warp definition is:
> everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
>
> Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
> images folder?
>
> B
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Jeff Kilbride


What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your webapp is
rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path. This
is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
mod_webapp, though.

--jeff

- Original Message -
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0 that
> make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> any hints?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> have you tried the following:
>
> 
>
> Carsten
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> my jsp page has this image:
> 
> The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp
page
> WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
>
> If I change it to:
> http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
> fine and fast!
>
> WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
>
> my warp definition is:
> everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
>
> Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
> images folder?
>
> B
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams

there must be some sort of  tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0 that
make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
any hints?

-Original Message-
From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

have you tried the following:

Carsten

-Original Message-
From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
my jsp page has this image:

The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp page
WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!

If I change it to:
http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
fine and fast!

WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???

my warp definition is:
everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb

Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
images folder?

B

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


I also noticed that if I put the image in the root of the webapp with the
jsp page it works fine  i.e.




-Original Message-
From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


have you tried the following:



Carsten

-Original Message-
From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
my jsp page has this image:

The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp page
WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!

If I change it to:
http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
fine and fast!

WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???

my warp definition is:
everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb

Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
images folder?

B




--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


yes, no worky!!!
:(

-Original Message-
From: Carsten Lingemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


have you tried the following:



Carsten

-Original Message-
From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
my jsp page has this image:

The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp page
WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!

If I change it to:
http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
fine and fast!

WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???

my warp definition is:
everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb

Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
images folder?

B




--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Carsten Lingemann


have you tried the following:



Carsten

-Original Message-
From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
my jsp page has this image:

The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp page
WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!

If I change it to:
http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
fine and fast!

WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???

my warp definition is:
everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb

Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
images folder?

B




--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Adams


I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
my jsp page has this image:

The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The jsp page
WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!

If I change it to:
http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It works
fine and fast!

WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???

my warp definition is:
everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb

Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle the
images folder?

B




--
To unsubscribe:   
For additional commands: 
Troubles with the list:

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

AW: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way

21 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information