Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Hi all I've been able to build mod_jk2 on MDK 7.2 using JK2 2.0.1 (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0 .1) But I still get ... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1 make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/usr/local/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.1-src/jk/native2/server/ap ache2' make: *** [jk2-build] Erreur 1 jkjni.so doesn't exists Does this mean that I won't use sockets ? Dom - Original Message - From: Dom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:47 PM Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Sorry Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18 automake 1.4-p5 autoconf 2.54 libtool 1.4.2 Doing : ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs I get : ... checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try `ltconfig --help' for more information. configure: error: libtool configure failed I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause while making mod_jk2 : ... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1 But now it's worse, I'm lost Dom - Original Message - From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you were to be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying the build. John -Original Message- From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hi I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12. I've got no problem on a RH 7.3. Why ? - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ release/v1.2.0 /doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Libapr.so ? Maybe in $APACHE_HOME/lib? I *added* -L/-R switches to the linker-relevant lines in the Makefile. -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enterprise Distributed Capabilities EDS Corporation 248-265-8283 : -Original Message- : From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] : Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 5:30 PM : To: Tomcat Users List : Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk : : : Hi all : : I've been able to build mod_jk2 on MDK 7.2 using JK2 2.0.1 : (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk : 2/release/v2.0 : .1) : : But I still get : ... : : /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr : collect2: ld returned 1 exit status : make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1 : make[1]: Quitte le répertoire : `/usr/local/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.1-src/jk/nat : ive2/server/ap : ache2' : make: *** [jk2-build] Erreur 1 : : jkjni.so doesn't exists : : Does this mean that I won't use sockets ? : : Dom : : - Original Message - : From: Dom [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:47 PM : Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk : : : Sorry : : Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18 : automake 1.4-p5 : autoconf 2.54 : libtool 1.4.2 : : Doing : : : ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs : --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo : cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 : --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs : : I get : : ... : checking for ranlib... ranlib : checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B : checking whether ln -s works... yes : ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try : `ltconfig --help' for more information. : configure: error: libtool configure failed : : I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause : while making : mod_jk2 : ... : /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr : collect2: ld returned 1 exit status : make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1 : : But now it's worse, I'm lost : : Dom : : - Original Message - : From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] : To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM : Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk : : : : Someone might have a slight chance of answering your : question if you : were : to : be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when : trying : the : build. : : John : : :-Original Message- :From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM :To: Tomcat Users List :Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk : : :Hi : :I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 : together, but not :Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC : 4.1.12. I've :got no problem on a RH 7.3. : :Why ? : :- Original Message - :From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] :To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM :Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk : : : Hum, : : Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, : btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you : should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : : : : :http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ :release/v1.2.0 :/doc/jk/aphowto.html : : : -- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : For additional commands, e-mail: :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : : : : :-- :To unsubscribe, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : For additional commands, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : -- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : For additional commands, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : : : : : -- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : For additional commands, e-mail: : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : : : : : -- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: : mailto:tomcat-user-: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : For : additional commands, : e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Paul J. Brzezinski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf Description: Binary data -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Sorry Linux MDK 7.2 w kernel 2.4.18 automake 1.4-p5 autoconf 2.54 libtool 1.4.2 Doing : ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --with-tomcat41=/usr/lo cal/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs I get : ... checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try `ltconfig --help' for more information. configure: error: libtool configure failed I had replaced the stock MDK autoconf and libtool, cause while making mod_jk2 : ... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la] Erreur 1 But now it's worse, I'm lost Dom - Original Message - From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you were to be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying the build. John -Original Message- From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hi I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12. I've got no problem on a RH 7.3. Why ? - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ release/v1.2.0 /doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
So if that binary didn't work then get this one. Rename it to mod_jk.so and copy it over the one you already have. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/i386/ rls Luminous Heart [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/02/2002 08:30 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk You are right, it is rh Linux 7.1. Event the binaries from johnturner.com did not work. Same error. --- Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First thing you do is let us know what OS you are using. Luminous Heart [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2002 08:46 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903). Please contact the vendor for the correct version. I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta site, but still get the same error. I am running apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12. What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that my old mod_jk is not working here. Thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903). Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ? http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/ Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to get also the Apache 2.0.42 rpm : http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/ Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Sorry, I do not do rpms. They are too tidy for me ;) let us put it that way. Yes, I can safely say I tried almost every build of the connectors. I am running jdk1.4.1 though. --- Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903). Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ? http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/ Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to get also the Apache 2.0.42 rpm : http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/ Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
I know you all are talking about Linux or Unix based
but I've found an excellent site for Windows
Apache/Tomcat JK.
http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/
For future reference! :-)
--- Luminous Heart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I do not do rpms. They are too tidy for me ;)
let us put it that way. Yes, I can safely say I
tried
almost every build of the connectors. I am running
jdk1.4.1 though.
--- Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with
this
version of Apache (found 20020612, need
20020903).
Did you tried with one from JK 1.2.0 release ?
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/rpms/
Since you're a Redhat user, may I recommand you to
get also the Apache
2.0.42 rpm :
http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
int myName() {
cout -Matt Fury \n;
return 0;
}
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put things on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are trusting someone else to do the right thing every time. Some people find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;) John -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put things on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are trusting someone else to do the right thing every time. Some people find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;) I understand that point and rpm packagers does their best to avoid any complication, for example my rpms for Apache 2.0, allow a coexistance with Apache 1.3 installed (diff conf dir, www dirs, lib dir..., listen ports). rpm is great when you are a newbie or when you have to duplicate a configuration on farms of machines and want so have a reproductible process. And when an user goes with a customly built package like Apache 2.0.42, he should be prepared to also have to build himself the others packages, like jk ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
As a matter of fact I have been building apache since the dawn of it ;) Also I have been building/using tomcat since it was a jserv module, in corporate environments too. So the whole process is in my hands. Now that I wanted to experiment with Tomcat 4.1, I am seeing this behavior. I was discouraged, a couple of months ago, from using 4.1.x because it was in pre-alpha then unstable beta. Now that it is released I thought things should be better. I have a cluster of 4.0.4 running, with apache 2.0.39, pretty good on my system. Thank you for the teasing, but I will appreciate it if you have a helping tip too ;) Regards, --- Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put things on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are trusting someone else to do the right thing every time. Some people find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;) I understand that point and rpm packagers does their best to avoid any complication, for example my rpms for Apache 2.0, allow a coexistance with Apache 1.3 installed (diff conf dir, www dirs, lib dir..., listen ports). rpm is great when you are a newbie or when you have to duplicate a configuration on farms of machines and want so have a reproductible process. And when an user goes with a customly built package like Apache 2.0.42, he should be prepared to also have to build himself the others packages, like jk ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
yes I built 2.0.42. What is the relation then? --- Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
That is exactly my opinion, but did not want to start a religious war about the validity of rpms :) Thank you, John, for making my case. --- Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you use an RPM, you're letting someone else decide where to put things on your machine, and how to configure your machine. You are trusting someone else to do the right thing every time. Some people find that annoying and risky, and prefer to make their own decisions. ;) John -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ release/v1.2.0/doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
As a matter of fact I have been building apache since the dawn of it ;) Also I have been building/using tomcat since it was a jserv module, in corporate environments too. So the whole process is in my hands. Ok, like me but since I've got a bad memory I put the build process in a rpm spec file where I'm sure I could find it for next release ;-) I have a cluster of 4.0.4 running, with apache 2.0.39, pretty good on my system. Great Thank you for the teasing, but I will appreciate it if you have a helping tip too ;) I give you the url of the jk 1.2.0 release documentation, which should give you all information to build jk 1.2.0 for Apache 2.0.42. - get jk 1.2.0 tarball http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.0-src.tar.gz - untar it - go to jk/native directory - use configure : ./configure --with-apxs=/your/path/to/apache2/apxs - make the stuff make - copy the mod_jk.so to apache 2 module dir cp apache-2.0/mod_jk.so /your/path/to/apache2/modules - Put in httpd.conf LoadModule jk_module /your/path/to/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile /your/path/to/apache2/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile /your/path/to/apache2/logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevelerror JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /servlet/*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /examples/servlet/*.jsp ajp13 You could find an example workers.properties in conf dir of tarball. That's all. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Hi I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12. I've got no problem on a RH 7.3. Why ? - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0 /doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
Someone might have a slight chance of answering your question if you were to be so gracious as to post the error messages that you get when trying the build. John -Original Message- From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hi I've been able to build Apache2.0.40 and mod_jk2 together, but not Apache2.0.42 and mod_jk2 on a MDK 7.2 system with TC 4.1.12. I've got no problem on a RH 7.3. Why ? - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk Hum, Having a Redhat box and not using rpm is strange, btw if you have build an Apache 2.0.42 on your system, you should be able to build mod_jk 1.2.0 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ release/v1.2.0 /doc/jk/aphowto.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
You are right, it is rh Linux 7.1. Event the binaries from johnturner.com did not work. Same error. --- Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First thing you do is let us know what OS you are using. Luminous Heart [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2002 08:46 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903). Please contact the vendor for the correct version. I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta site, but still get the same error. I am running apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12. What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that my old mod_jk is not working here. Thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk
First thing you do is let us know what OS you are using. Luminous Heart [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2002 08:46 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:tomcat 4.1.12 with apache2.0.42 and mod_jk httpd: module mod_jk.c is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020612, need 20020903). Please contact the vendor for the correct version. I tried compiling different mod_jk's from jakarta site, but still get the same error. I am running apache 42, new compile and trying to compile 4.1.12. What is the best way to compile mod_jk, knowing that my old mod_jk is not working here. Thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
