Which connector to use, and how to build
Please help Computer: UNIX Sparc 2.9 Apache 2.0.54 Tomcat 5.0.28 Please tell me what connector to use. I see the jk2 is in history. The last version it supports is 2.0.43. I downloaded the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.10-src.tar, it is difficult to find a clear instruction for the build process. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which connector to use JK 1.2 or JK 2
I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0 Tomcat 4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work but I am uncertain. If someone could clarify the difference between these connectors and which to use I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which connector to use JK 1.2 or JK 2
Jk2 is a refactoring of jk. Jk2 uses APR library, and AFAIK, it's easier to build against apache 2. I tried some days to make jk2 to work, without too much success. mod_jk is a lot easier. jk2 gives you statistics of the connector from the apache side. Emerson Reis, Tom wrote: I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0 Tomcat 4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work but I am uncertain. If someone could clarify the difference between these connectors and which to use I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Emerson Cargnin Analista de Sistemas Setor de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas - TRE-SC tel : (048) - 251-3700 - Ramal 3181 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which connector to use JK 1.2 or JK 2
I've used both.. With 4.1 and 5. In fact our staging server uses jk2 and live server jk1. I would say use 1. Its less bother. Less configuration and I've also found that jk2 has issues when you want to load balance java content from static I've seen loads of examples where the whole webapp is mounted e.g. JkMount /examples/* which seems to me plain nonsense JkMount /servlet/* myworker JkMount /*.jsp myworker JkMount /*.do myworker would seem to fit the bill. With Jk2 however I had a problem where you needed to mount the webapp name (context) to get it to play Location /examples/servlet/* JkUriSet group ajp13:localhost:8009 /Location Which was a pain in the arse and you also had to do similar jiggery pockery in workers2.properties. I had it working once when i checked a version out of cvs. But this seems to change with every release. Jk seems the stable release i'll be sticking to it, at least for the time being. HTH Mark On 27 May 2004, at 18:10, Reis, Tom wrote: I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0 Tomcat 4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work but I am uncertain. If someone could clarify the difference between these connectors and which to use I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which connector to use JK 1.2 or JK 2
I seem to remember there were problems if you tried to run jk1 with virtual hosts and also apache https. Does that sound right? -Original Message- From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:52 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Which connector to use JK 1.2 or JK 2 I've used both.. With 4.1 and 5. In fact our staging server uses jk2 and live server jk1. I would say use 1. Its less bother. Less configuration and I've also found that jk2 has issues when you want to load balance java content from static I've seen loads of examples where the whole webapp is mounted e.g. JkMount /examples/* which seems to me plain nonsense JkMount /servlet/* myworker JkMount /*.jsp myworker JkMount /*.do myworker would seem to fit the bill. With Jk2 however I had a problem where you needed to mount the webapp name (context) to get it to play Location /examples/servlet/* JkUriSet group ajp13:localhost:8009 /Location Which was a pain in the arse and you also had to do similar jiggery pockery in workers2.properties. I had it working once when i checked a version out of cvs. But this seems to change with every release. Jk seems the stable release i'll be sticking to it, at least for the time being. HTH Mark On 27 May 2004, at 18:10, Reis, Tom wrote: I am confused as to which connector to use for connecting II 6.0 Tomcat 4.1.30. It appears that either the JK 1.2 or the JK 2 will work but I am uncertain. If someone could clarify the difference between these connectors and which to use I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it from your computer. Although our company attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which connector to use in order to get client cert
Is there a way to have a servlet get the client certificate that was used to connect to apache? I have tomcat 4.1.24 running as the backend to apache 2.0.44. Clients set up a mutually authenticated SSL connection to apache, and all servlet requests get forwarded to tomcat. What connector should I use in order to allow the forwarding of not only the servlet request, but also the certificate so that the servlet can identify the user? thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which connector to use?
Hi! I have to understand which connector to use w/ Apache 1.3 and Tomcat 4.1.18 I believe there are 3 options: jk, jk2 and webapp. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which connector to use?
I am upgrading an old 3.2 tomcat and apache implementation to the new 4.1.12 and apache 1.3.27. This is running on a linux box with the latest 2.4 kernel. I am questioning which connector to go with the mod_jk or the mod_jk2? This is for a highly active production site so stability is a key issue, but of course so is speed. Can anyone break down the advantages and disadvantages of the two connectors? thanks ryan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
Re: Which connector to use?
Strictly an opinion thing, If you want a lot of help and examples with what is considered mature code the mod_jk Other wise mod_jk2 has some exciting new stuff a happening. rls developer@wexwar ez.com To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 11/04/2002 01:35 Subject: Which connector to use? PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List I am upgrading an old 3.2 tomcat and apache implementation to the new 4.1.12 and apache 1.3.27. This is running on a linux box with the latest 2.4 kernel. I am questioning which connector to go with the mod_jk or the mod_jk2? This is for a highly active production site so stability is a key issue, but of course so is speed. Can anyone break down the advantages and disadvantages of the two connectors? thanks ryan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
Re: Which connector to use?
so more specifically what is new in mod_jk2 ? Is it just new features built on the same code base or is it a completely rewritten version? On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote: Strictly an opinion thing, If you want a lot of help and examples with what is considered mature code the mod_jk Other wise mod_jk2 has some exciting new stuff a happening. rls developer@wexwar ez.com To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 11/04/2002 01:35 Subject: Which connector to use? PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List I am upgrading an old 3.2 tomcat and apache implementation to the new 4.1.12 and apache 1.3.27. This is running on a linux box with the latest 2.4 kernel. I am questioning which connector to go with the mod_jk or the mod_jk2? This is for a highly active production site so stability is a key issue, but of course so is speed. Can anyone break down the advantages and disadvantages of the two connectors? thanks ryan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
Re: Which connector to use?
The code base for mod_jk2 is a complete re-write. mod_jk2 has greatly improved support for connecting to Tomcat via JNI (most useful for multi-threaded servers like IIS/Apache-2/iPlanet), and also supports using Unix-sockets. The request mapping (e.g. deciding if Tomcat or Apache handles the request) has been optimized (although I'm not certain if this is in the Beta, or only the CVS at the moment). This is important for sites where you would have a large number of JkMount directives with the older mod_jk. There are plans to add more hot-config options (e.g. deploying a new webapp w/o having to re-start Apache). [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0211041525460.31460-10;wexwarez.com... so more specifically what is new in mod_jk2 ? Is it just new features built on the same code base or is it a completely rewritten version? On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote: Strictly an opinion thing, If you want a lot of help and examples with what is considered mature code the mod_jk Other wise mod_jk2 has some exciting new stuff a happening. rls developer@wexwar ez.com To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 11/04/2002 01:35 Subject: Which connector to use? PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List I am upgrading an old 3.2 tomcat and apache implementation to the new 4.1.12 and apache 1.3.27. This is running on a linux box with the latest 2.4 kernel. I am questioning which connector to go with the mod_jk or the mod_jk2? This is for a highly active production site so stability is a key issue, but of course so is speed. Can anyone break down the advantages and disadvantages of the two connectors? thanks ryan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
