Re: Topband: 9Y4/OK2ZI 60m? +1

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Steve and Karel,

On the 9Y4 (ITU Reg.2) the band 5250 – 5450 kHz is allocated on a secondary 
basis to the Amateur service. Maximum output power is 1.5 kW... 

The best way for US is to use ch5 / 5405kHz.
In case of split operation it is commonly used ch4 / 5373 for TX and lsn up on 
ch5 / 5405kHz.
In case of QRM on these channels it can be used also ch1 / 5332kHz... any kind 
of split hopping
in between these channels.
All CW.

I can recommend to use also split arrangement for EU (many EUs wants to work 
their new one 9Y4):
Use 5352kHz for TX and lsn up1 or up2 for EU / WRC-15 allocation.
All CW.

Many thanks for activating 9Y4 on 60m band!

73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
http://60mband.blogspot.com
http://160mband.blogspot.com




On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Steve Lawrence via Topband wrote:
> My good friend Karel, OK2ZI, is currently QRV from 9Y4. He plans on 60m 
> operation:
> 
> "I have also 60m licence. What is the best QRG for the USA? I do not 
> have this band at home so I do not know it.
> But I hope that US stations enjoy the pile at 60m."
> 
> I can't advise him on this so feel free to email him directly.  ok...@atlas.cz
> 
> TU & 73 - Steve WB6RSE
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>

-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx
MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: Satisfactory fiberglass pole for K9AY loop

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Pete,

i am using for years the Extra Heavy duty 10m fiberglass pole from DX-Wire (the 
only GRP Mast "EXTRA" 
heavy duty "strongest" mast with 18mm tip section!) and I can recommend it as 
the strongest pole
I ever used. It has nothing to do with tiny poles available on the market... 

http://www.dx-wire.de/lng/en/fiberglass-poles/fiberglass-poles/

73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
http://160mband.blogspot.com



On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, at 3:43 PM, N1SV wrote:
> Look around for the fiberglass stackable army surplus mast sections 
> either at a local flea market or online.  Think they come in 4-foot 
> sections. That’s what I’ve been using to support my K9AY loop for years.
> 
> Les, N1SV 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Feb 20, 2019, at 9:15 AM, N4ZR  wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe 15-20 years ago, I used a very inexpensive push-up  fiberglass pole 
> > to support the loops of a K9AY loop system.  Alas. details and source have 
> > fled my brain, and much of what I've studied on line is much more expensive 
> > (and probably much sturdier) that what I had then. I'd appreciate any 
> > current suggestions.
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> > Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> > at , now
> > spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> > For spots, please use your favorite
> > "retail" DX cluster.
> > 
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>

-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: Topband Phenomenon

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

I have the same experiences from this weekend during the FOC Marathon on
Topband. I heard the same in case of G's and other coastal stations > it did
not happened with sigs from inland stations... the difference was few S units.

Even more I noticed another "SDE" phenomenon this weekend which sounds strange 
to me.
I made short vid here: https://youtu.be/cV3rzlsZbA4

QSK has been useless at that time, it appeared only on TB (nothing on 80m).
North signals came thru fluttered. US sigs raised up at that time for several S 
units.
All happened with 300m long Beverages to NA and SA ...no difference.

Anybody knows what happened to me that morning? It disappeared in 1.5hr...

73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
http://160mband.blogspot.com



On Mon, Feb 4, 2019, at 5:13 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
> I wouldn't count on it!
> 
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com
> 
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 9:25 PM terry burge  wrote:
> 
> > Maybe the International Space Station could reflect a 160 meter signal or
> > reradiate it. It's larger than a football field. Just a thought. Let's see,
> > people could use the space station to bounce signals off of. Another reason
> > to keep it from falling in the Pacific Ocean someday.
> >
> > Terry
> > KI7M
> >
> > > On February 3, 2019 at 2:44 PM Arthur Delibert 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Back in the early 60s, NASA launched a couple of satellites named Echo I
> > and Echo II that were essentially huge reflecting balloons.  You could tune
> > to WWV on 20 MHz at a time of day when that was above the MUF.  When the
> > Echo satellite came by, WWV would pop up out of nowhere for a few seconds
> > and then disappear again.  To the best of my knowledge, the Echo satellites
> > are long gone; but this sounds like a similar phenomenon.
> > >
> > > Art Delibert, KB3FJO
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Topband  on behalf of Paul Kiesel
> > via Topband 
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 2:10 PM
> > > To: topband@contesting.com
> > > Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Phenomenon
> > >
> > > I don't have an explanation for this, but I had a similar experience
> > during the contest. My receiveantenna is an unterminated BOG running
> > alongside the road in front. I struggled to get F4HEC's call because he was
> > so weak. He persisted and I finally got it. He was the first European that
> > I heard in the contest. When we finished the QSO, EI0R dumped his call and
> > he was 579. Unbelievable because I almost never hear Europe on 160 CW. I
> > gave him a report and turned it back. By then he was barely copyable as his
> > signal had dropped back down to the noise floor and I never heard him
> > again. I managed to work several other Europeans whose calls I had to work
> > at digging out. I would say conditions were generally good for me to hear
> > those European stations, but the momentary signal from EI0R was very strong
> > and unexpected.
> > > 73, Paul K7CW
> > >
> > > On Sunday, February 3, 2019, 9:38:50 AM PST, Dan Atchison via
> > Topband  wrote:
> > >
> > >  During the CQ WW 160 CW contest a week ago while operating at the N1LN
> > > M/S station, I happened to be in a fantastic run of EU.
> > >
> > > On one and only one QSO, I worked a "G" station whose callsign's last
> > > suffix letter was at least 20dB stronger than the rest of his call.  I
> > > mentioned this to NR4M while discussing the contest with Steve at the
> > > Richmond Frostfest and he said he experienced the same on one occasion;
> > > he thought meteor and I was thinking airplane.
> > >
> > > Anyone else experience this on topband and if so, have a "scientific"
> > > explanation?
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Dan -- N3ND
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> > >
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>

-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: QRG on 160 in North and South America

[Petr Ourednik]

Rune

maybe this will help a bit. 
http://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-list.html

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Wes wrote:
> I have heard them on 1829.4 here in Arizona.
> 
> Wes N7WS
> 
> On 1/21/2019 10:41 AM, Rune Øye wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We are preparing our WEB page for 7P8 In March this year. I am aware about
> > fish beacon and bad QRG`s seen from Northern EU, JA`s basically from 1820
> > to 1825. What frequency should be avoided in North and South America?.
> > License received, waiting final confirmation from our host regards to the
> > antenna "farm".
> >
> > 73 Rune LA7THA
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> >
> 
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>

-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: QRG on 160 in North and South America

[Petr Ourednik]

Rune

check this link also
http://160mband.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-forbidden-dx-frequencies-table-on.html

Petr OK1RP

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Wes wrote:
> I have heard them on 1829.4 here in Arizona.
> 
> Wes N7WS
> 
> On 1/21/2019 10:41 AM, Rune Øye wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We are preparing our WEB page for 7P8 In March this year. I am aware about
> > fish beacon and bad QRG`s seen from Northern EU, JA`s basically from 1820
> > to 1825. What frequency should be avoided in North and South America?.
> > License received, waiting final confirmation from our host regards to the
> > antenna "farm".
> >
> > 73 Rune LA7THA
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> >
> 
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>

-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

Jarda, OK1RD is still active.
Contact is here: http://www.ok1rd.com/

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Victor Goncharsky via Topband wrote:
> HI folks,
> I've problems with TOR browser in Ubuntu 16 so could not read mail.ru 
> emails blocked by UR government, including the ones from this reflector 
> for quite a long time. The problem has been solved.
> As you probably know the licensing authority in Czech Republic started 
> to reissue the old 2X2 calls and many 2X3 owners have been changing 
> their calls. My assumption is that this OK1YQ could be the case or 
> simply a computer error at ARRL Hq.
> CU on the band
> 
> 
> >Воскресенье, 18 ноября 2018, 1:15 UTC от Pete N8PR :
> >
> >I worked OK1RD in 2011 on 2 Meter EME.  Don't k now if he is still active
> >73,  PeteR  N8PR
> >Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
> >
> >
> >
> >ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
> >
> >Who is it ??
> >
> >http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1&zoom=a
> >uto,-12,848
> >-- 
> >Nick, UY0ZG
> >_
> >From: w...@w5zn.org
> >To: 'topband' < topband@contesting.com >
> >Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
> >Message-ID: < edb1b9ba3cc1ec998bca03d9d1eb5...@w5zn.org >
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> >
> >Hi J.C.,
> >
> >I have not worked this station on 160 meters or on 2 meter EME (or on 
> >any band).
> >
> >73 Joel W5ZN
> >
> >
> >On 2018-11-16 13:32, n...@n4is.com wrote:
> >> I never heard him on any band but he must be very active on EME
> >> 
> >> ARRL DXCC - 2 Meters -151 OK1YQ
> >> 
> >>  http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-2M-20181116-USLetter.pdf
> >> 
> >> 73's JC
> >> N4IS
> >> 
> >
> >_
> >Searchable Archives:  http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 
> 
> -- 
> 73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, ex UB5WE), P.E.
> UARL Technical and VHF Committies
> DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mixed, Phone), 9BDXCC, 8BWAS
> DXCC card checker (160 meters).
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: Rather use N-type (was Re: The answer to PL-259 soldering/reliability problems)

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

I can confirm Martin's and Greg's experiences. It is strongly recommended to 
avoid 
using the PLs at all. I did the same changes and since that no problems at all.

Of course any adapters are avoided too. All cables must be properly assembled 
with proper
and high quality N-connectors. Never use/buy the connectors without assembly 
instructions 
including the cutting lengths layout.

The only issue to think about it carefully is the power rating of N-connectors 
(even PTFE).
These connectors are not designed and dedicated for high power and as the inner 
pin is 
a bit tiny I do not recommending to use them over "legal limit"...

I tested the PTFE version of N-connectors at 4kW in the lab and there was no 
problem but
it was in comfortable conditions... low humidity, well mounted, no soft iron 
soldering etc.
The conditions outside the shack can be a different situation...

In general - using the N-connectors with high quality cables properly mounted 
up to "KPA500" 
is highly recommended. The higher power level is deserving the 7/16 DIN usage 
or similar.

(all is talking about "professional" approach to our ham radio hobby)

Hope it helps,
73 - Petr, OK1RP 




 

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Martin Kratoska wrote:
> Did he same. Since this change no problem anymore. Confirming what Greg 
> says and can only recommend - throw away all PLs and go to N!
> 
> 73,
> Martin, OK1RR
> 
> Dne 06. 12. 18 v 5:00 Greg-zl3ix napsal(a):
> >   
> > 
> > I continue to be mystified by the fact that the amateur radio
> > community insists on using PL259 connectors. N-type are much more
> > reliable (used by professional communicators), low cost, can be crimped
> > easily and quickly and have a well-defined impedance right up into GHz
> > frequencies.
> > 
> > Back in 2005 I started having contact problems with the
> > connector on my SteppIR 3-element. There was a thin layer of oxide that
> > built up around the centre pin of the PL259. I had had similar problems
> > with other connectors around my shack. I decided to change my entire
> > station, including the SteppIR, to N-type, and have never looked back.
> > 
> > 
> > 73, Greg, ZL3IX
> > 
> > On 06.12.2018 13:29, Steve Ireland wrote:
> > 
> >>
> > G'day
> >>
> >> About five years I discovered this fool-proof and brilliant
> > way to solder PL-259s invented by Bill Maxon N4AR who taught this to Tim
> > K3LR. Tim uses this method throughout his contest station and did a
> > great job of documenting it - see http://www.k3lr.com/engineering/pl259/
> > [1] and it has totally changed my angry and worried attitude towards
> > soldering PL-259s.
> >>
> >> The key component is Amphenol 83-1SP connectors.
> > The connector body is silver and the shell is nickel and you can buy
> > them from Mouser or DX Engineering.
> >>
> >> Vy 73
> >>
> >> Steve, VK6VZ
> >>
> >>
> > ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> > software.
> >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus [2]
> >> _
> >>
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband [3] - Topband
> > Reflector
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > Links:
> > --
> > [1]
> > http://www.k3lr.com/engineering/pl259/
> > [2]
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > [3] http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> > 
> 
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: 160m Condx

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi,

the article about fishnet is here (including the beacon/drift nets):

https://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/drift-nets-fishing-beacons.html
https://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-list.html

Hope it helps,

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Paul Mclaren wrote:
> I hadn't seen it mentioned but here in NW EU the continuous dashes from
> Fish Net beacons can be a pain at times.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul MM0ZBH
> 
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 08:55, Petr Ourednik  wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > an old article here:
> >
> >
> > https://160mband.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-forbidden-dx-frequencies-table-on.html
> >
> > 73 - Petr, OK1RP
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, at 1:54 AM, Saulius Zalnerauskas wrote:
> > > Thanks,
> > > How about JA?
> > > 1810-1824.9
> > > Where is better not CQ?
> > > Sam LY5W
> > > Just back home from W6
> > >
> > > 2018-11-12, pr 20:27 Mike Waters  > >
> > > > Perfect! Thanks for sharing.
> > > >
> > > > 73, Mike
> > > > www.w0btu.com
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:13 PM VE6WZ_Steve  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Know bad frequencies- great resource here:
> > > > > http://www.k8nd.com/TopbandBadFreqs.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > However…a “best practice” on 160m is NEVER call CQ on an exact
> > frequency.
> > > > > Why is it ever necessary to call on 1830, 1820, 1822 etc. exactly?
> > Call
> > > > CQ
> > > > > on 1820.3, or 1820.4 or 1822.6 or 1827.8.
> > > > > Perhaps its human nature to want to use a nice “round” number, but
> > this
> > > > > accomplishs nothing except increase the chances of being on a
> > harmonic
> > > > QRG.
> > > > > Its surprising how many DX-peds will do this too.  We don't need a
> > nice
> > > > > frequency with no decimal points! You will be found just fine with
> > all
> > > > the
> > > > > skimmers and spotters out there.
> > > > >
> > > > > de steve ve6wz.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 12, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Filipe Lopes  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a listing of such frequencies? Want to avoid those in the
> > coming
> > > > > contests
> > > > >
> > > > > 73's Filipe
> > > > > CT1ILT CR5E CR6K
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my Huawei Mate 8
> > > > >
> > > > > Na(o) Seg, 12 de nov de 2018, 17:28, Mike Waters  > >
> > > > > escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish we could get the word out to avoid frequencies like that:
> > 1810,
> > > > > 1820, 1830, etc. There are almost always AM BC harmonics on those
> > freqs.
> > > > >
> > > > > 73, Mike
> > > > > www.w0btu.com
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:24 PM k1zm--- via Topband <
> > > > > topband@contesting.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Band still down a bit from last week but 4k6fo good sigs now on
> > 1830.0
> > > > > from Alim.
> > > > > 73 JEFF
> > > > > _
> > > > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > > > Reflector
> > > > >
> > > > > _
> > > > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > > > Reflector
> > > > >
> > > > > _
> > > > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > > > Reflector
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _
> > > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > > Reflector
> > > >
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> >
> > --
> > 73 - Petr, OK1RP
> > --
> > B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
> > G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
> > G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: 160m Condx

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi,

an old article here:

https://160mband.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-forbidden-dx-frequencies-table-on.html

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, at 1:54 AM, Saulius Zalnerauskas wrote:
> Thanks,
> How about JA?
> 1810-1824.9
> Where is better not CQ?
> Sam LY5W
> Just back home from W6
> 
> 2018-11-12, pr 20:27 Mike Waters  
> > Perfect! Thanks for sharing.
> >
> > 73, Mike
> > www.w0btu.com
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:13 PM VE6WZ_Steve  wrote:
> >
> > > Know bad frequencies- great resource here:
> > > http://www.k8nd.com/TopbandBadFreqs.pdf
> > >
> > > However…a “best practice” on 160m is NEVER call CQ on an exact frequency.
> > > Why is it ever necessary to call on 1830, 1820, 1822 etc. exactly? Call
> > CQ
> > > on 1820.3, or 1820.4 or 1822.6 or 1827.8.
> > > Perhaps its human nature to want to use a nice “round” number, but this
> > > accomplishs nothing except increase the chances of being on a harmonic
> > QRG.
> > > Its surprising how many DX-peds will do this too.  We don't need a nice
> > > frequency with no decimal points! You will be found just fine with all
> > the
> > > skimmers and spotters out there.
> > >
> > > de steve ve6wz.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 12, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Filipe Lopes  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Is there a listing of such frequencies? Want to avoid those in the coming
> > > contests
> > >
> > > 73's Filipe
> > > CT1ILT CR5E CR6K
> > >
> > > Sent from my Huawei Mate 8
> > >
> > > Na(o) Seg, 12 de nov de 2018, 17:28, Mike Waters 
> > > escreveu:
> > >
> > > I wish we could get the word out to avoid frequencies like that: 1810,
> > > 1820, 1830, etc. There are almost always AM BC harmonics on those freqs.
> > >
> > > 73, Mike
> > > www.w0btu.com
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:24 PM k1zm--- via Topband <
> > > topband@contesting.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Band still down a bit from last week but 4k6fo good sigs now on 1830.0
> > > from Alim.
> > > 73 JEFF
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > Reflector
> > >
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > Reflector
> > >
> > > _
> > > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > > Reflector
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: VE1ZZ Nite

[Petr Ourednik]

Tree,

agree! We should...

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Tree wrote:
> We could rename the PreStew (which starts in one minute).
>
> Tree
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:42 AM JL PFIRMAN  wrote:>
> > God rest your soul Jack,may His Perpetual Light Shine upon you.
> >
> >   To All,we have the" Stew " ,how about the "Jack"on
> >   the> > yearly anniversary of his death?
> >
> >   No logs to send in,just an evening on top band ,cw or ssb
> >   ,your> > choice."eh".  73 RIP Jack . Jim W3TO
> > _
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector

73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: VE1ZZ has passed on - Very Very Sad news! (Long)

[Petr Ourednik]

Very sad, 

Jack was my first VE on TB when I got my first novice lis with call
OL1BVR. I was totaly amazed that morning and I was not able to focuse
for anything in school all that day...
I runned 10W only into sloped 41m wire in the city and Jack was the only
guy who found me on the band.
We exchanged dozen of letters and Jack explained me several basic things
about Top band operation. Real gentleman.
I will miss him...

RIP Jack,
Petr OK1RP

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Chris G3SVL wrote:
> Terrible news. Like Ian, I could always rely on Jack being the
> first NA> station to call me in a contest. The record being 3 minutes in on 
> one> CQWW160.
>
> RIP OM.
>
> 73 Chris, G3SVL (currently @ VK9XG- and will be on for SP)
>
> > On 20 Oct 2018, at 00:32, Ian Fugler  wrote:
> >
> > That is very sad news, but thank you for a such a personal insight
> > into Jack's station and his life, Jeff.  I'm sure the tributes to
> > Jack will be almost endless, such was his status.  His signal was
> > awesome and he was nearly always the first station in north America
> > to call me on topband in each and every contest, often well before
> > any other NA signals appeared on the band.  I last worked Jack on
> > 160m in 2014 and I recall the contact to this day.  It was early
> > evening UK time and I was listening to the east on a very
> > directional beverage. It was Jack's signal that alerted me it was
> > time to listen to the north west.  I switched rx aerials and there
> > were several (weak) north American stations calling me.  But Jack's
> > was the only signal from that direction that I could hear off the
> > back of the east beverage.  My log tells me that I had dozens of
> > QSOs with him over the years.> >
> > RIP, Jack.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Ian G4IIY
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf
> > Of Tree> > Sent: 19 October 2018 18:13
> > To: Jeffrey Briggs
> > Cc: 160
> > Subject: Re: Topband: VE1ZZ has passed on - Very Very Sad news!
> > (Long)> >
> > Very sad news.  The passing of a legend.  I remember hearing
> > "zulu zulu"> > from A73A back in 2012.  My only NA on 160 in the CQ WW SSB.
> >
> > Tree N6TR
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:10 AM k1zm--- via Topband
> > > > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Gang
> >>
> >>
> >> I am truly saddened to have to pass along the contents of an email
> >> I just> >> received from Carl Leahy who was one of Jack Leahy,  VE1ZZ's 
> >> sons.> >>
> >>
> >> It is short and sweet - but I will add some personal comments after> >> 
> >> sharing his note to me.
> >>
> >>
> >> +=
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Carl Leahy carl.leahy1@gmail.comHide
> >>
> >> To
> >> k1zm k...@aol.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeff, our family wanted you to know that dad passed away last
> >> evening. If> >> you could let the people in the ham world know we would 
> >> really
> >> appreciate> >> it. It was a very big part of his life . He had just been 
> >> talking
> >> about you> >> and the book you gave him a few years ago..
> >>
> >>
> >> Carl Leahy
> >> Signing off for VE1ZZ 😞
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ++
> >>
> >>
> >> A few comments from my memory now follow - as best I recall them:
> >>
> >>
> >> VE1ZZ was not only a personal friend to many of us - he was
> >> probably one> >> of the finest Topband Dx'ers ever to have lived.  He goes 
> >> back to
> >> not long> >> after W1BB came back on the band at the end of WW!! - and was 
> >> one
> >> of the> >> strongest signals I have ever witnessed on Topband.  His signal 
> >> was
> >> almost> >> LEGENDARY all over the world.  EU stations used to say  - "He is
> >> almost as> >> loud when he calls in Asian pileups as the EU callers are 
> >> over
> >> here"...and> >> that says it all!
> >>
> >>
> >> Jack Leahy was personally responsible for my migrating to VY2ZM
> >> and was> >> here at my home twice - once is 2002 and once in 2012.  I last
> >> visited him> >> and Opal (his XYL) in August of 2014 with Mike OE6MBG who 
> >> wanted
> >> to meet> >> Jack and see his QTH .
> >>
> >>
> >> When I finally had the time after building my house here on PEI  to
> >> visit> >> Jack which was probably in July of 2003 or 2004, at first blush 
> >> his
> >> place> >> did not make a huge impression on me because it had only a short
> >> triangular> >> portion of land at the road in the Head of Jeddore NE of 
> >> Halifax -
> >> and the> >> land rose rapidly behind his home.  One initially wondered "How
> >> does he get> >> out so well from here down at the road?"
> >>
> >>
> >> The answer came shortly thereafter - Jack took me out behind the
> >> house -> >> and we climbed that hill - up and up and up for something like 
> >> a
> >> MILE - it> >> was a pizza slice in shape and very wide at the top of the 
> >> hill
> >> in the> >> woods - with only about 100 feet (if that) at the road front 
> >> side
> >> of the>

Re: Topband: No 160m Sunrise Peak

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Roger,

as Nick, VE7DXR said already on this reflector I have to confirm that the 
expected "peak" should be more or less the significant decreasing of the noise 
in fact and due to that effect the rapid S/N improvement.

I reviewed my very old logs from 80's (when I was active on TB as OL1BVR almost 
daily) and I found several notices in my log around the SR about dramatic 
decreasing the noise during the grey line phenomenon on TB which is raised up 
back with the coming full daylight.  

On the other hand Dave, W0FLS and others referring to an increase in actual 
signal levels (with corresponding increase in S/N).

So it looks like both of these effects are playing the role in the game...
Is there anybody who made an observation using some SDR + PC s/w spectrum 
measurement during the SR/SS please?   

Best regards,
73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
http://160mband.blogspot.com
http://60mband.blogspot.com



On Wed, Jan 31, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Roger Kennedy wrote:
> 
> Just to re-state something I posted a few weeks ago . . .
> 
> I made a point of checking signal strengths last weekend in the CQ WW.
> 
> Once again, there was absolutely NO increase in signals strengths around our
> Sunrise (0730Z), and if anything they started to drop off.
> 
> This was regardless of how far west the stations were.
> 
> Don't ask me why . . . in the old days, you would only bother coming on
> around Sunrise to work DX, as signals would increase by as much as 10 -
> 20dB.
> 
> Roger G3YRO
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Band Open - But No Sunrise Peak

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

the original question was about the signals level peak during the SR/SS 
phenomenon time... did someone noticed the same "No Sunrise peak" behavior 
please?

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Ken Boasi wrote:
> High noise levels must be driving people off the band. Conditions have 
> been generally good in the last week, but activity has been light. 
> 
> Have heard several UA9 stations on both 80/160 and worked a few on 80. 
> Europe has also been in very good on both bands. 
> 
> I heard you working the US last night Roger-you were about 579 when I 
> listened. 
> 
> I know a number of folks in the NE USA worked UK9AA last night with 'AA 
> having a good signal for a few hours between 2300-0200z. 
> 
> 73, Ken N2ZN 
> 
> > On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:04 AM, GEORGE WALLNER  wrote:
> > 
> > Some EU stations were S7 in Miami last night, Unfortunately, noise on my TX 
> > antenna was also S7.
> > 
> > George
> > AA7JV
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:34:58 -0500
> > Thomas Hoyer  wrote:
> >> I must be in a black hole as I have listened every night this week and 
> >> heard no EU. Probably doesn't help I have an S7 to S9 noise level 
> >> though
> >> Tom
> >> W3TA
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Roger Kennedy 
> >> To: topband 
> >> Sent: Fri, Jan 12, 2018 4:57 am
> >> Subject: Topband:  Band Open - But No Sunrise Peak
> >> The band has been open for DX from Europe almost every night this week . . 
> >> .
> >> so let's hear some more activity from you North American guys!   (I'm
> >> usually on from around 23.30 Z)
> >> However . . . I'm still amazed that there seems to be no peak in signals
> >> around our Sunrise (in the old days, when conditions were much better, 
> >> signals would usually
> >> increase by at least 10 to 20dB, both ways)
> >> Roger G3YRO
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> > 
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Band Open - But No Sunrise Peak

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Tom and Roger,

I decided to add my 2c as I noticed the same behavior with no GL peak for last 
weeks
over here...
I remember the great peaks during the Grey line phenomenon condx window 
years ago but not now. I tried to observing the condx during the GL window for 
last 
few weeks on TB (thanks to Xmas time and my illness on ATB) with the similar 
results
as Roger reported. 
Also I tried to switch in between several RX antennas like W2PM MiniDiamond 
loop, 
K9FD loop, low dipole as same as my TX antenna (loaded half sloper) and there 
was no 
difference regarding the peak at the GL time...

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://160m.blogspot.com


On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Thomas Hoyer wrote:
> I must be in a black hole as I have listened every night this week and 
> heard no EU. Probably doesn't help I have an S7 to S9 noise level 
> though
> 
> 
> Tom
> W3TA
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Kennedy 
> To: topband 
> Sent: Fri, Jan 12, 2018 4:57 am
> Subject: Topband:  Band Open - But No Sunrise Peak
> 
> 
> The band has been open for DX from Europe almost every night this week . . .
> so let's hear some more activity from you North American guys!   (I'm
> usually on from around 23.30 Z)
> 
> However . . . I'm still amazed that there seems to be no peak in signals
> around our Sunrise 
> 
> (in the old days, when conditions were much better, signals would usually
> increase by at least 10 to 20dB, both ways)
> 
> Roger G3YRO
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Anyone else hear these?

[Petr Ourednik]

https://160mband.blogspot.cz/search/label/Beacons?updated-max=2015-07-29T01:49:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=2&by-date=false
73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017, at 10:23 PM, Lew Sayre wrote:
> Yo,
> or they could be signals from  outer space.Ya just never
> know...> 73 and I remain,
>   Lew w7ew
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Wes Stewart > wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all of the replies.  Seems I'd heard these mentioned
> > someplace> > but didn't put two and two together.
> >
> >
> > On 12/16/2017 1:19 PM, Wes Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> From time to time I'm hearing some non-ham stations transmitting
> >> on 1823> >> and 1829 KHz.  These signals typically pop up as steady
> >> carriers then> >> identify in Morse and disappear.  I've heard IDs of 
> >> 4OMD, 4NAF and
> >> 4NAG.> >>
> >> Ideas?
> >>
> >> Wes  N7WS
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >>
> >
> >
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: 160m beacons list update

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi JC,

thanks. The YR2TOP beacon responsible is YO2LC se we should talk about
it to him.
If I understood well what he is doing to preserve the band a bit is that
his 100W
beacon is turned off during the big contests.

Yes, the frequency of the beacon as same as 100W out is an unhappy
choice I guess...

73 - Petr, OK1RP



On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, at 12:03 PM, JC wrote:
> Hi Petr
> 
> I kind understand your request, however I would like to share my view,
> Beacon on 160m is really DQRM, like YO on 1810.5 running 100w. Several DX
> stations runs 100w and work thousands of QSO.s. Please how is responsible
> for the YO beacon, turn it off, please again. 
> 
> The MUF is always above 3 MHz!
> 
> 160m is very narrow 50KHz for most countries.  Beacons on 160m just eat
> band
> and DQRM.
> 
> My two cents, 
> 
> JC
> N4IS
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Petr
> Ourednik
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:54 AM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: 160m beacons list update
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> just FYI, I updated the beacons list today.
> 
> I will be appreciated to get any report or info about beacons from 160m
> band
> in Your location to put it into the list or to update it here
> accordingly...
> 
> https://160mband.blogspot.ch/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-list.html\
> 
> Thank you for your kind help,
> 
> 73 - Petr, OK1RP
> --
> http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Topband: 160m beacons list update

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello all,

just FYI, I updated the beacons list today.

I will be appreciated to get any report or info about beacons from 160m
band in Your 
location to put it into the list or to update it here accordingly...

https://160mband.blogspot.ch/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-list.html\

Thank you for your kind help,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
--
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Small garden DX

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi John,
congrats...

Just 1p note > be careful with the back to back diodes in the front-end.
These are not the best solution in some cases because of possible IMD
issue.

73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ


On Tue, Oct 31, 2017, at 07:50 AM, John Randall via Topband wrote:
> Lat night I worked two stations YU1XA and I5JVA and was happy with that,
> then went to bed. I have now cured most of my QRN and common mode
> problems and could see weaker stations on the flex panadapter. Silly me,
> I did learn a painful lesson £2.50 when my preamp went dead and upon
> opening it up, I realized that I had forgotten to add double back to back
> diodes across the preamp input. A new 2n5109 and protection diodes was
> soldered into place and I was back on the air.
> Next step is to make a loop antenna for receive.
> 73John - M0ELS
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: More on radials

[Petr Ourednik]

Mike,

check it:
http://www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html
http://www.ok1rr.com/index.php/antennas/45-notes-on-ground-systems

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com


On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, at 03:03 PM, Michael Walker wrote:
> Here is my problem I am trying to solve.  This is why I was asking about
> radials earlier.
> 
> 
>- I have a full length 1/4 - ish wire that runs over top a tall tree
>and
>the last 25 ft or so are horizontal
>- I can do elevated radials or lay radials on the ground
>- I'm not worried about SWR as I can dial that out later.
>- I have an 80m common feed point for a similar wire for 80M cw
> 
> The antenna does work, but I can tell by the SWR 2:1 bandwidth I have
> significant ground losses now with 4 ground radials ~ 1/4 wave for each
> band (80/160)
> 
> Thoughts and suggestions?
> 
> Mike va3mw
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-- 
73 - Petr, OK1RP
B: goo.gl/Fd2JhJ
G+: goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: goo.gl/gP99xq
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: New Noise - 160 Meters

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello,

not only the "defective" LED lamps makes the noise.

I found several LED strips (used commonly in kitchen)
and LED bulbs coming from China generates strange noise 
on HF bands. I noticed it when the noise raised up from S3 to S7
on 160m while I was on key. So I immediately went to investigate
what was changed at our home and I discovered that XYL switched
ON the LED strip installed in kitchen cabinets.

The same noise source was the LED bulb in the small bed lamp in the
bedroom. After I replaced all of these Chinese crappies with standard
lamps
the noise gone. (LED strip in kitchen cabinets must be OFF when I am on
key, hi)

Hope it helps,

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
> I found a defective LED lamp that sounded.  Getting the neighbors to 
> turn off lamps one by one while you listen in the shack over the phone 
> might help if they will do that.   In my case it had peaks staring in 
> the AM band and noticeable up to 4 Mhz.  Also a bad cell phone charge 
> adapter power source could be the cause.
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/13/2016 1:41 PM, Joe Galicic wrote:
> > Boxbe  This message is eligible for 
> > Automatic Cleanup! (gali...@comcast.net) Add cleanup rule 
> > 
> >  
> > | More info 
> > 
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Link to files 
> > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3ftcsm50mvr9jmy/AABcDfHjYn-GKvelQhmyJTBia?dl=0
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > From: "Joe Galicic" 
> > To: "PVRC List" , "TopBand List" 
> > 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 1:35:15 PM
> > Subject: Topband: New Noise - 160 Meters
> >
> > Just put up my 160 antenna and have a new noise source to find. Very loud 
> > wide band buzzing that starts in the middle of the AM broadcast band and 
> > then abruptly drops to zero at 1870 KHZ. I have attached sound file and 
> > panadapter screen shots. It is not coming from my QTH. One night it went 
> > off at 11PM sharp but has returned and doesn't seem to quit. I will 
> > continue to monitor for a cycle. I walked the neighborhood with portable AM 
> > radio and the noise seems to be contained within a four house area. Tough 
> > to tell which house though. All utilities are buried in my neighborhood. 
> > Could this be a grow lamp ? Thanks -Joe N3HEE
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: 470 non carbon resistor

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Rag,

the important is to look for carbon composition / ceramic composition
resistors
at 2W power rating at least. The Ohmite has their OY series / 2W for
example.

Mouser:
588-OY-470-E 
http://eu.mouser.com/Search/ProductDetail.aspx?qs=K%2fk%252b2unYRtW4en7Bt3IFdQ%3d%3d

Farnell / Newark:
64K5431 
http://www.newark.com/ohmite/oy471ke/resistor-ceramic-470-ohm-2w-10/dp/64K5431

The resistors datasheet:
http://www.ohmite.com/cat/res_ox_oy.pdf

More info links:
http://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm
http://www.w0btu.com/Beverage_antennas.html
http://n1eu.com/topband/BeverageTips.htm

Hope it helps,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com


On Sun, Sep 18, 2016, at 01:47 PM, Stein-Roar Brobakken[LB3RE-K3RAG]
wrote:
> Hi Petr
> 
> Please - What is article number at mouser???
> 
> 73s LB3RE Rag
> 
> 
> -Original Message-----
> From: Petr Ourednik [mailto:indi...@xsmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 6:33 PM
> To: K3RAG LB3RE Brobakken ; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: 470 non carbon resistor
> 
> Stein
> 
> In US:
> Carbon resistors 470/2W here - mouser.com Cores here - kitsandparts.com
> 
> ...I bought them here too.
> 
> 73 - Petr, OK1RP
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 03:29 PM, K3RAG LB3RE Brobakken wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hello
> > 
> > Where do you buy stuff for beverage like 470 ohm non carb resistor for 
> > terminating and cores for 9:1 in US ?
> > 
> > 
> > 73s Rag
> > Stein-Roar LB3RE
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> 
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4545/12021 - Release Date:
> 04/12/16
> 
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: 470 non carbon resistor

[Petr Ourednik]

Stein

In US:
Carbon resistors 470/2W here - mouser.com
Cores here - kitsandparts.com

...I bought them here too.

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 03:29 PM, K3RAG LB3RE Brobakken wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello
> 
> Where do you buy stuff for beverage like 470 ohm non carb resistor for
> terminating and cores for 9:1 in US ?
> 
> 
> 73s Rag
> Stein-Roar LB3RE
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: BCB High Pass Filter

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Roger,

if you would not like to waste money then look and build this filter:

http://www.ok1rr.com/index.php/technical-topics/40-an-efficient-mw-band-stop-filter

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
http://160mband.blogspot.com



On Thu, Mar 3, 2016, at 05:46 PM, Roger White wrote:
> Everyone, thanks for the info. I really only need a Rx only filter. The
> DLWC BCB filter looks nice.
> 
> BTW, does anyone know if Clifton Labs still in business? I thought I saw
> somewhere they no longer sell products. I remember years ago they had
> some high quality products.
> 
> Roger White W5RDW
> Murphy, TX
> 
> > On Mar 3, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Roger White  wrote:
> > 
> > Anyone have a BCB High Pass Filter that they would recommend? Seems like 
> > there were a number of sources for these a number of years ago, but Google 
> > only came up with a few now. 
> > 
> > Roger White W5RDW
> > Murphy, TX
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: CQ160

[Petr Ourednik]

Herb

for lot of EUs is prohibited to operate below 1810!
For that reason we missed several stations which did not tuned up over
the test...

73 - Petr, OK1RP

BTW: definitely agree with Carl. I heard several US stations calling own
CQ test under EU big guns...

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
> You nail it CarlIf there could only be by gentleman's agreement in 
> Europe a 5 Khz window anywhere on the band for NA stations to be at 
> least heard and worked...sort of a EU "CQ Test"  machine free zone.  
> Would that be of any help? I have thought of using 1809 and QSX up on 
> 1811 but understand there are commercial data transmitters below 1810 
> there in EU.
> 
> 
> Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
> 
> On 1/30/2016 2:03 PM, Carl Jonsson wrote:
> > Boxbe  This message is eligible for 
> > Automatic Cleanup! (carl.jonss...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule 
> > 
> >  
> > | More info 
> > 
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Cq160 is not very interesting for a dx-er anymore. A handfull of european
> > big guns are covering the band with CQ over and over again but they don't
> > seem to hear very well. During the morning hours I can hear a layer of NA
> > and SA stations behind the usual european contest stations who keep CQ-ing
> > test continuously. And it seems to be the same problem in the US. Hope to
> > meet you after the contest!
> > 73 Carl SM6CPY
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 from VK Land.

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello Ron,

many thanks for informations. It is explaining a lot... :)
We tried to catch VKs but no way this weekend.

Short report from our OK5T event this week is here:
http://160mband.blogspot.ch/2016/02/cq-160m-dx-cw-contest-2016-at-ok5t.html

I am sending my big apologize if we accidentally QRMed someone during
the contest.
I really adhere to good manners and gentleman's operation. We always
tried to stay at least 
300Hz far from another station when looked for QRG for RUN but sometime
it was hard job 
on so crowded band.

I hope to hear and work you again in the contests as OK5T or as my own
call OK1RP.

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://160mband.blogspot.com
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com


On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 11:50 AM, vk3io wrote:
> Hi all Top Banders.
> 
> This year's contest was almost a total wipe out as far as VK was 
> concerned, due to summer storms on the east coast and the usual topical 
> storms up north and a cyclone off the west coast made it impossible.
> 
> I did hear a few good signals from North America during our Saturday 
> evening in amongst the constant S9+20dB static crashes and some great 
> signals from Europe at around our Sun rise time on our Sunday and Monday 
> mornings, as the static level subsided.
> 
> I managed only 12 qso's, only to Europe.
> 
> It seemed like there was going to be a good peak to Europe on our Monday 
> morning at our Sun Rise, but I had to depart early for work. Some great 
> signals, some S9 and if I had been on at the peak, maybe even stronger.
> 
> Cheers, until next contest, CQ WW 160 Phone.
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: safely sharing an RX antenna

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi

it sounds like SO2R on the same band... Its interresting for me too. I
am using one solution in CQ160m in order to use 2nd radio for S&P but
its disconnected from antenna and grounded as same as 1st radio in RUN
during TX period. So I am curious what other TBers are using...

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 07:06 AM, Bob Kupps via Topband wrote:
> Hi I was thinking about using a 3dB splitter and tuning the band with our
> second K3 using our HiZ monoband 8 circle while we were calling CQ in the
> Stew. The center of the array is located 105 meters from the xmit
> vertical, uses 20' elements, the included preamp and 100m of RG6
> transmission line. 
> Could dangerously high signal levels appear at the unmuted second radio
> antenna terminal? What about if the second radio is inadvertently tuned
> to the xmit frequency? It would seem impossible if the external antenna
> preamps are not damaged...but I'm still a 1R op so I better ask first!
> TU 73 Bob HS0ZIA
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Fast relay ???

[Petr Ourednik]

Doug

I am going to ship you the relays for free. Just let me know to address
and phone number for parcel service. 

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015, at 04:15 AM, Douglas Ruz (CO8DM) wrote:
> Martin, Tom and all members of the list,
> 
> The AS RXFEP is very nice but it is very expensive.
> 
> I prefer the KD9SV modify by Martin, OK1RR...it is very easy to build but
> i 
> need only the relays...someone can help me to get those relays ???...are 
> they available at digikey or mouser ???
> 
> The circuit is very easy to duplicate but i just need the fast relays.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 73Douglas, CO8DM
> 
> "No creo que haya alguna emoción más intensa para un inventor que ver
> alguna 
> de sus creaciones funcionando. Esa emoción hace que uno se olvide de
> comer, 
> de dormir, de todo." - Nikola Tesla 
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Topband: 160m beacons list

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi,

there is an improved list of the TOP band beacons on new 160m band blog
(bothering advertisement free)

http://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-list.html

As You can see it is still "trial" and it's not final version and many
of the beacons listed over here was reported 
years ago... maybe an operation has been cancelled or so. I will be
appreciated to get any report or info about 
beacons from 160m band in Your location to put it into the list.

Thank You for help,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 151, Issue 20

[Petr Ourednik]

FYI,

http://topband.blog.cz/0810/drift-nets-fishing-beacons
http://topband.blog.cz/0611/160m-beacon-list

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://160mband.blogspot.com




On Tue, Jul 28, 2015, at 06:33 PM, Milan Gütter, OK7GU wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The Topband Fish Buoys
> 
> (see for example)
> http://www.ryokuseisha.com/eng/
> http://www.taiyomusen.co.jp/eng/products/radio_buoy/
> http://www.taiyomusen.co.jp/pdf/TB-568S-E.pdf   and others
> 
> we hear in Europe too (with good antenna).
> 
> Sometimes, during good openings, is the topband full of signals.
> 
> 
> 
> 73 and Good DX
> 
> Milan OK7GU
> www.ok7gu.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dne 28.7.2015 v 18:00 topband-requ...@contesting.com napsal(a):
> > Send Topband mailing list submissions to
> > topband@contesting.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > topband-requ...@contesting.com
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > topband-ow...@contesting.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Topband digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: fishnet beacon (Art Snapper)
> > 2. Re: fishnet beacon ( K1FZ-Bruce )
> > 3. Re: fishnet beacon (Bill Cromwell)
> > 4. Re: fishnet beacon (Art Snapper)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:04:34 -0400
> > From: Art Snapper 
> > To: k...@myfairpoint.net
> > Cc: Topband 
> > Subject: Re: Topband: fishnet beacon
> > Message-ID:
> > 
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > I am not sure what it would accomplish, but we could put the loggings on
> > the DX cluster.
> >
> > Art
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, K1FZ-Bruce  wrote:
> >
> >>   Art,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hearing several strong ones 1820-1926 KHZ most to my East toward the Grand
> >> Banks.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Wonder if anyone has ever sent any, a SWL card requesting they use an out
> >> of Ham band frequency? hi
> >>
> >> No QRZ listings ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
> >> Bruce-K1FZ
> >>
> >> http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:39:16 -0400, Art Snapper  wrote:
> >>
> >> I was tuning around tonight about an hour before local sunset, and heard a
> >> fishnet beacon on 1960KHz. I think it was PFB1 or something like that. I
> >> only heard it twice before it faded.
> >> I happened to be using a HB coaxial loop favoring E. There was too much QRN
> >> on the BOG's to hear it.
> >>
> >> Art NK8X
> >> Kalamazoo, MI
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:47:44 -0400
> > From: " K1FZ-Bruce " 
> > To: n6...@verizon.net, Topband 
> > Subject: Re: Topband: fishnet beacon
> > Message-ID: <20150727154744.xn9dv1ciogc40...@webmail.myfairpoint.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=UTF-8;  format="flowed"
> >
> > Do not know yet, will see what I can find. I have heard of drift nets.
> > It can be tough on the whales.
> > They cut one Hump Back loose in the Gulf of Maine recently.
> > ?
> > 73
> > Bruce-k1fz
> > ?
> >
> > Do they even have stationary fish nets?
> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> >
> > Art,
> > ?
> > Hearing several strong ones 1820-1926 KHZ most to my East toward the
> > Grand Banks.
> > ?
> > Wonder if anyone has ever sent any, a SWL card requesting they use an
> > out of Ham band frequency? hi
> > No QRZ listings ?
> > ?
> > 73
> > Bruce-K1FZ
> > http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html
> > ?
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:39:16 -0400, Art Snapper wrote:
> >
> > I was tuning around tonight about an hour before local sunset,
> > and heard a
> > fishnet beacon on 1960KHz. I think it was PFB1 or something like that. I
> > only heard it twice before it faded.
> > I happened to be using a HB coaxial loop favoring E. There was too much QRN
> > on the BOG's to hear it.
> >
> > Art NK8X
> > Kalamazoo, MI
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:54:23 -0400
> > From: Bill Cromwell 
> > To: topband@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: Topband: fishnet beacon
> > Message-ID: <55b68c6f.7000...@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This has come up before right here. It was pointed out that *we* are the
> > primary users of that spectrum. If we are not using it we can't expect
> > those untrained people to not use it. If we go ahead and use our
> > spectrum they will QSY ju

Re: Topband: Video Switch for Low Band Antenna switching

[Petr Ourednik]

Roger,

I am using this remote 12 channels switch
http://m.ebay.com/itm/281575028616?nav=SEARCH

I equiped it with rf BNC connectors into the box and wired into required
configuration. 

I am using it for years for my receiving antennas selection and it works
perfectly. 

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015, at 09:17 PM, donov...@starpower.net wrote:
> As an alternative, in my opinion the receiving antenna switching
> capabilities 
> of the K9AY 8x2 switch are far superior to any available alternative: 
> 
> 
> 
> - eight antenna input ports 
> - two independently controlled receiver output ports 
> - any antenna input switchable to either or both receiver output ports
> with no interaction and excellent isolation 
> - two, three or more antenna input ports can be simultaneously switched
> to either or both receiver output ports 
> 
> 
> http://www.aytechnologies.com/Products/RAS8x2data.htm 
> 
> 
> 73 
> Frank 
> W3LPL 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> 
> From: "Roger D Johnson"  
> To: "Top Band Reflector"  
> Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2015 9:47:43 PM 
> Subject: Topband: Video Switch for Low Band Antenna switching 
> 
> I've been looking for a way to switch multiple receiving antennas to
> multiple 
> receivers. I know some hams are 
> using video switchers but info on them is scarce. There is a Dynair
> SVA-100B for 
> sale on eBay but no real description 
> of it's functions. 
> 
> It seems obvious that you can, for instance, switch input 3 to output 7
> but can 
> you simultaneously switch input 
> 5 to output 6? In other words, can you have more than one path through
> the switcher? 
> 
> Any other ideas on switching greatly appreciated! 
> 
> 73, Roger 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _ 
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: VK6DXI

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi,

I am shocked and shattered to hear that we lost Mirek. I worked Mirek
several times on lowbands and I have dozen QSOs on other bands. Mirek
was excellent operator, friend and great human...

Mirek I will have You in my mind forever. 

RIP Mirek,
73 - Petr, OK1RP 

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Andrzej_SP6AEG wrote:
>  We are shocked and upset to hear the news of the death  of Mirek
> Rozbicki's (ex SP5IXI, VK6DXI, 9V1XE, and others).
> 
>  Death occurred suddenly. 
> 
>  Funeral  will  be held on Tuesday 21/4/15 at St. Simon Peter  Parish, 
>  20
> Prendiville Avenue, Ocean Reef, WA, 6027.
> 
>  His viewing will be at 10 am and the ceremony will commence at 10:30 am.
> 
>  
> 
> Andy
> 
> SP6AEG
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: ARRL 160m contest and DX Window?

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi Peter

I don ´t think so.  :)
I have just 2x BOGs, 1x Hi-Z vertical and MiniDiamond W2PM loop all
connected to
wireless antenna switch. If You will add the 
time for tunning around frequency using RIT + playing with four rx
antennas and tx antenna 
then You have about 5sec...
Well of course sometime its all much shorter but 
I wanted to note that listenning just 2-3sec only 
is really short and it´s possible to missing weak sigs very easily...

Thank You Peter,

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014, at 11:16 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
> You must have quite a number of receiving antennas and a very slow switch
> 
> 73
> Peter
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Petr
> Ourednik
> 
> When I am calling CQ I am trying to listening with switching between all
> of
> my RX antennas combination to ensure that nobody is calling me... so in
> my case I need to listenning
> between each CQ at least 30-45sec I guess.
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: ARRL 160m contest and DX Window?

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

the split JA operation schema for decades ago was:
JA TX > 1907.5 - 1912.5kHz and listen for rest or worls in between 1820
- 1825kHz.
This "JA window" 1907.5 - 1912.5kHz has been not used in contests from
1999 by JARL 
because the band was too narrow. The SSB was not permitted. 
I worked several JA topbanders over there split down to 1820 - 1825kHz.

According to the Ministry's announcement, effective April 1st 2000,
additional 15kHz, i.e. from 1810 kHz to 1825 kHz, has been allocated for
amateur radio use. The announcement was available in the
Japanese language at
http://www.mpt.go.jp/top/public-comment/public-comment000207.html
but it does not work I guess.

You might be interested in JA band plans which is available here.
http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/6_Band_Plan/JapaneseAmateurBandplans20090330.pdf
Some additional notes to the figure:
NB Phone = SSB, AM
NB Image = SSTV
NB Data = RTTY, PSK31, JT modes etc
(but no RTTY on 2200 and 160m)
WB Phone = FM
WB Data = Packet
(tnx to Rin, JG1VGX)

Regarding the DX window down on TB I am trying simply not calling CQ in
between 1825 - 1835kHz
from EU. In fact my CQ is even not so effective from my fixed QTH as my
receiving performance is not 
the best so I would not like to bother on the band when I am not able to
hear weak sigs coming back.
In general calling CQ with just few sec of hearing to repeat CQ again is
terrible technique which is not
applicable on TB I guess. When I am calling CQ I am trying to listenning
with switching between all of
my RX antennas combination to ensure that nobody is calling me... so in
my case I need to listenning
between each CQ at least 30-45sec I guess.

Also there are bad spots (forbidden QRG) on TB which should be avoided
for CQ.
1820 is often jammed by radar from China in JA
1818 strong QRM from local GPS correction on 1818 in ZL

To keep the Gentlemen band (better to say > give it back to the old ages
Gentlemen shape) we should
strictly observing basic gentlemen agreement...

My 2c...

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://160mband.blogspot.com  



 

  




On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 09:28 PM, JC wrote:
> Mike  
> 
> The DX Windows dated few  decades ago,  from the time US stations used to
> transmit  1800 to 1810 and listening in the DX windows 1825 to 1830 , all
> because the band was packed with LORAN signals, to work JA the DX window
> was
> 1907 to 1913. I may be wrong with some frequencies, Call CQ and tuning
> was
> actually try to find someone calling you back somewhere in the band.
> 
> The original Idea is the DX (not US)  to call between 1830 and 1835 but
> QSX
> down or up to RX. 
> 
> What is not part of the Gentlemen band is calling CQ and listen 3 seconds
> and call again and listen 3 seconds, .. There is no way to copy or to
> work
> any DX, just  calling like a cw machine gun to hold the frequency . This
> kind of operational practice very common just keep the frequency busy
> with
> no QSO's and at a very low QSO rate. It is very common to hear and most
> of
> the time work DX station below those alligator's contest stations parked
> in
> the DX window.
> 
> QRM the QRM'ers does not make it right as well, as we elected to be part
> of
> the Gentlemen band we should demonstrate it by example and some talk
> during
> eye ball QSO's.
> 
> 73's
> N4IS
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
> Waters
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:27 AM
> To: topband
> Subject: Topband: ARRL 160m contest and DX Window?
> 
> The ARRL 160 meter contest is this weekend. I know there has been a lot
> of
> controversy in the past about the 1830 to 1835 segment (the so-called "DX
> Window").
> 
> I understand that if I am in the USA, the right thing to do is to NOT
> park
> in that window and call CQ (but I can answer a CQ from a DX station on
> another continent or island). The rule at http://www.arrl.org/160-meter
> simply states "*6.1. *The segment 1.830 to 1.835 should be used for
> intercontinental QSOs only."
> 
> Maybe some of the more experienced Topbands could clarify this.
> 
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: FW: Front End Saver for Top Band

[Petr Ourednik]

Rodger,

I built several of them for my station as same as for our local contest
club station and all works like champ. (Martin's version)

State nr. 1
QSK T/R is floating
Re1 - closed
Re2 - open
Re3 - open
In this case ANT port is connected to RX input port and AMP port is
floating. 

State T/R is grounded
Re1 - open
Re2 - closed
Re3 - closed
In this case ANT port is floating, RX input port is grounded and AMP
port is grounded too. 

Hope it helps. 

73 - Petr, ok1rp

On Fri, May 30, 2014, at 09:50 AM, rodger bryce wrote:
> 
>  
> From: gm3...@hotmail.com
> To: g...@yahoogroups.co.uk
> Subject: Front End Saver for Top Band
> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 18:45:14 +
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone built the front end saver by KD9SV or the OK1RR version which
> uses 12 volt reed relays.
>  
> I am attempting to build the 12v version on veroboard and have the
> following query, when the unit is supplied with 12v relays 1 & 2 are
> energised, when the PTT is operated relays 2 & 3 are energised basically
> relay 2 remains energised at all times, is this the correct sequence of
> operation?
>  
> thanks Rodger/GM3JOB 
>   
>   
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Help!

[Petr Ourednik]

Bob,

it should be HS0ZKX or HS0ZEE but in contest is QRV ZKX...
73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 04:39 PM, Chortek, Robert L wrote:
> GM
> 
> I worked the HS0 for a new one (139) this morning BUT my log just crashed
> and I forgot his suffix.  Did anyone else work him and know the full
> call?
> 
> Please help.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Bob 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: To clamp or NOT...that IS the question

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello Jim,

3x fast relays, 2x switching transistors, 3x resistors and box with
connectors...
You have KD9SV front-end saver. No diodes, no RX performance
degradation.
I never had issue on my K3 with KD9SV saver in ext.RX front-end.
Let me know I will send You the drawing.

Hope it helps my friend,
best regards,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://160mband.blogspot.com

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014, at 06:37 PM, James Rodenkirch wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> A friend of mine is building me a switching arrangement with a reed relay
> to switch between my transmit antenna and a receive delta loop to the one
> antenna input for my Ten Tec Jupiter (I operate at QRP levels for
> contests).
> As an added measure of protection for the KD9SV low noise pre-amp I use
> with my 160/80 delta loop antenna, he believes clamping the RX antenna
> port or shunting to ground during TX sounds like a nice thing.  But, he's
> seen arguments that clamping receiver input with diodes degrades the
> receiver performance. He find this believable, but I don't know how true
> it is, e.g., he knows KD1JV claims his RX performance is achieved by
> using 2N7000 FETs to do T/X switching.
> He has a bunch of 2N7000 and will probably use one to turn on the relay. 
> He can turn on another one along with the relay driver that will shunt
> the RX antenna port to ground but he wonders if that would degrade
> receiver performance.
> Thoughts?  72/72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV
> 
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: K3 & some interesting noise lessons in the ARRL 160.

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello Guy,

Thank You for an interesting analyse. 
Which s/w and f/w do You have on K3 loaded please?

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013, at 05:35 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
> This may be specific to a K3 and no joy for other rigs. But there might
> be
> parallels elsewhere.  Definitely YMMV.
> 
> Usually in a 160 contest I try and get a run frequency down around
> 1815-20.
> For some reason in my locality that range is, and for a long time has
> been,
> a general garbage minimum in the noise floor around here, sometimes 2-3
> dB
> better, so there is no incentive to CQ elsewhere. I have not had a
> problem
> establishing down around 1815-20, even when running 100 watts.
> 
> But this year, off and on since late summer, and of course without any
> rhyme or reason or published schedule, I have had a really bad
> intermittent
> power line style buzz that was S7 to ten over S9, depending on only
> heaven
> knows what. I have not had any luck localizing it, largely because of
> it's
> variable and erratic nature. A lot of the time it has irregularly
> separated
> fast bursts, almost like it's trying to send Morse with its buzz.
> 
> On the first night of the ARRL 160 contest, buzz was entirely absent. And
> I
> actually had the ARRL 160 weekend clear of family conflict for the first
> time in recent memory. Oh Joy! By the end of the first night I already
> had
> a personal best for the contest. The second night the noise struck half
> way
> through with a solid buzz. Ten over S9 in my usual hangout 1815-20-ish. A
> little less noise up higher but still covering all but the louder
> signals.
> No real help using my newly repaired and pattern-verified NE RX antenna.
> Loud there, too. Earlier work had ruled out a source in my or neighbor's
> houses. No quickie fixies.
> 
> I was unable to hear anything except the louder signals, which I had
> pretty
> well worked out the previous day.  Forget operating. So I decided to
> experiment with the noise mitigation methods/settings on the K3.
> 
> Usually in these buzz circumstances, you can't find a persistent weak
> signal on 160 far enough into the noise to let you experiment with noise
> mitigation settings based on signal to noise. You wind up using the
> reduced
> noise level as the only clue for settings.
> 
> Reduced noise level method is fine if you are working strong signals and
> you just don't want to hear the noise. But to pull out weak signals what
> you really need is to restore signal to noise separation all the way down
> to the weak signals. It turns out best signal-to-noise and best
> level-of-noise do not always generate the same weak signal readability.
> Some methods/settings reduce noise well but also trash the weak signals
> in
> the process.
> 
> But being the contest, 160 was *loaded* with weak signals to test with.
> So
> I spent a few hours experimenting with K3 settings on weak signals,
> optimizing for S/N. Came up with NB only (no NR) DSP T1-7 + IF NAR4 using
> "250" 8 pole filter, which clearly gave the best separation between weak
> signal and noise, without the usual weak signal obliteration from
> traditional noise blanking in a contest.
> 
> Usually the buzz gating the NB will add a 180 Hz raspy modulation (center
> carrier and +180, -180), an irritating buzzy noise, and can mush the
> wanted
> signal.  Narrowing the CW width to 250 or 200 Hz (+/- 100 Hz) cleans off
> both the modulation (3 x 60 Hz), and signal-covering "hashy fuzz" caused
> by
> the irregular shape of the buzz waveform.
> 
> After the determination of those settings, I scanned the band with those
> settings in NB. I discovered a narrow "null" in the noise or sweet spot
> between 1831 and 1833, sounding almost normal, with clear rendition of
> weak
> signals, which was up to 2 s-units better than the NB improvement in the
> least effective spots, which included my normal hangout of 1815-20. 
> Don't
> ask me how that works, because I haven't a clue.
> 
> 1831.5 was unoccupied, as was 1832.5 in a later stretch, where operating
> with the blanking on, it was as if the noise was not there at all. (See
> an
> earlier post about my unfortunate adventure with the DX window rule.)
> 
> That narrow sweet spot in the blanked noise was still there Tuesday, at
> 1830-1832. With the noise back solid, and using the NB settings above,
> Tuesday night I was hearing LZ2DF on 1832 clearly, at what I would call
> 559
> or 549. He was not hearing me running 1.5 kW, so this was clearly a
> normal
> state of affairs, controlling noise was on his end, not mine, even though
> the buzz was full on.
> 
> Wednesday the buzz was there with separated bursts, but not quite so
> loud,
> and the aforementioned NB settings killed it at least semi-decently
> across
> the band. Go figure. I was able to clearly pull out way-down birdies and
> such, simply not there without the NB.
> 
> Thursday the noise-blanking sweet spot was at 1.838, and a little broader
> than during the contest. The RX ante

Topband: Topband blog OK1RP movement

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello friends,

sorry for bothering. Just FYI...

There http://160mband.blogspot.com/ is the replacement of the my preview
Topband blog here http://topband.blog.cz/ because of an aggressive
advertising and flash banners inserted by the blog provider. For older
posts access You can visit the old link which will exist still... but it
will not be updated anymore. I will try to move all technical articles
to new blog step by step but rest of articles will stay there untill the
closing this source finally. (2014)

I decided for movement to the new provider as I really don't want to
bother all of the readers with unwanted advertising and strange flashes
even in Czech language...
Hope it will make my blog much more comfortable to read as same as my
60m band blog here http://60mband.blogspot.com.

Best regards,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Fw: Mike, VK6Hd.

[Petr Ourednik]

Hello,

it is the most sad information for me. Mike was an excellent operator
and real gentleman.
Mike was my first VK/Oceanian on TB when I was young novice on band and
he was always 
ready to help. We exchanged a lot of letters regarding the TB antennas
and operation tactics.

Mike will be missed not by myself but in all TB family!
Mike, RIP and pass our 73 to Stew, W1BB

Petr, OK1RP



On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, at 06:10 PM, W2PM wrote:
> Sad news indeed. Great op, great guy and my first VK on Topband. His Qsl
> still in shack on wall for that.  Used to work him on 30 too. RIP and 73
> Mike. 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:05, "Bruce"  wrote:
> 
> > Passing of VK6HD.  
> > Mike will be greatly missed especially by 160 meter DXers.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Kim Lyon
> > VK6TM ( son of VK6LK )
> > 
> > 
> > On 12/04/13 09:39, Robin Lyon wrote:
> > 
> >   It is with great sadness that I inform you that Mike died this 
> > morning. As you are aware, I regarded him as a close friend and I shall 
> > miss our weekly skeds. 
> >  For the record, Mike was the top Australian operator on the current DXCC 
> > Honor Roll.
> >  73
> >  Robin.
> > 
> > All good topband ops know fine whiskey is a daylight beverage.
> > _
> > Topband Reflector
> All good topband ops know fine whiskey is a daylight beverage.
> _
> Topband Reflector
All good topband ops know fine whiskey is a daylight beverage.
_
Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: RIG PROTECTION FROM BEVERAGES

[Petr Ourednik]

Wayne,

I am using the home made KD9SV front-end saver for long time on receiver
input and
I have never any troubles with blowing the receiver input port. Fast
high quality relays 
is th key, just to think about the protecting diodes of the relays which
are commonly 
used in these kind of circuits. I am not using them in order to avoid
IMD issues.

Regarding the lightning / storm protection I am always disconnecting
coax feedlines from
radios and grounding them OUTSIDE the house. It is uncomfortable a bit
but the most secure
for equipment I think.

Hope it helps,

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013, at 04:22 PM, Wayne Willenberg wrote:
> As I originally explained in my first post on this subject, I have the 75
> Ohm feedline from my Beverages connected directly to the antenna input on
> my FT-5000.  I thought I should be concerned about lightning protection
> and
> the destruction of at least the front end of my receiver.
> 
> 
> Thanks to several of you who responded, I now know the larger concern
> should be the Beverage feeding my transmitted signal back into the
> receiver. This is probably of particular concern since I always use my
> linear at about 1500W when transmitting.
> 
> 
> However, no one proposed a solution.
> 
> 
> I have been looking on the Internet, and one possible solution is Array
> Solutions Model AS-RXFEP, RF Front End Protector.  The advertising claims
> to protect in the feedback situation as well as in a lightning situation.
> The insertion loss is claimed to be only 0.3dB.  For only $55 this seems
> like a good investment.  Does anyone have experience with this unit or
> would you please suggest an alternative?
> 
> 
> Thanks again for your help.
> 
> 
> 73, Wayne KK6BT
> _
> Topband Reflector
--
"Noses out of the screens and back on the radios!"(G3VTT)
"See You on the wireless"(G3ZWH)
 

_
Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: How Good is Good Enough?

[Petr Ourednik]

Mike,

I am confirming Carl's experiences. Just in my case the BOG is 600' long
and terminated at 330 ohms. When I tried to use my W7IUV preamp giving
20dB
it was too much and noisy. So finaly I am using this preamp with W2PM
rotary
loop and BOG is used alone w/o preamp and works very well on my
property.
(50 ohms feed line system is used)

73 - Petr, OK1RP




On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:29:50 -0400, "Dan Kovatch"
 said:
> I'm in Carl's camp. Both my Bogs are shorter at about 350 feet but one
> was 
> once over 500 and worked fine (had to shorten due to 'development of real 
> estate'. I terminate at 270 ohms and wind xfrms for the same impedance.
> No 
> preamp needed and they are very quiet so signals just pop out of the
> noise 
> floor.
> 
> Dan W8CAR
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: ZR
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:58 PM
> To: Mike Waters ; topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: How Good is Good Enough?
> 
> Ive said several times that my 500' BOG's dont need a preamp. The signal
> level may be 5-6dB lower than the elevated ones in the same direction but
> thats more likely due to signal angle.
> 
> One or two on here keep claiming 500' wont work and I say it all depends
> upon the ground.mine is about as poor as you can get.
> 
> For best performance you need to know your RF ground resistance and wind
> the
> transformer accordingly. I used 250 Ohms for the ground.
> 
> Carl
> KM1H
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Mike Waters" 
> To: "topband" 
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: How Good is Good Enough?
> 
> 
> > How does the signal level from a BOG compare to the signal level from an
> > elevated Beverage? I'm sure the output from a BOG is less. But how much
> > less? Enough to require a remote preamp? I've always wondered.
> >
> > I --and many others-- have found a remote preamp on an *elevated* Beverage
> > to be totally unnecessary, even with the lossy matching transformers that
> > I
> > used in the past. The only DC I ever run down my ~600' of  RG-6 feeding a
> > Beverage is to reverse directions.
> >
> > 73, Mike
> > www.w0btu.com
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I have about 350 feet of quad-shield RG-6 ... it has only one BOG on it
> >>
> > ___
> > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> >
> >
> > -
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4865 - Release Date: 03/11/12
> >
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK 
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: LOTW

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

...really bothering to getting 10-20 messages daily about the LOTW on
the
TB related mailing list. Sorry but I am thinking about unsubscribing
from there
cos the discussion is not devoted to the Topband technically focused
topics.

73 - Petr, OK1RP
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: field day CQ 160

[Petr Ourednik]

Ludek,

congrats for excellent job!!!
You arranged very nice setup even although the wx was against as same
as condx.

Hope to see You on TB soon.

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:20:42 +0100, "Luděk Odehnal OK2ZC OK3C"
 said:
> web info 
> http://www.ok5z.cz/news/cqww-2012-pote/
> 
> pictures 
> http://ok5z.rajce.idnes.cz/CQ_WW_160M_CW_2012
> 
> video 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji8pcJYdbeI&feature=g-upl&context=G2c6ad80AUAA
>  
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> 
> OK2ZC & OK3C
> 
> Luděk
> 
> ok2zc.blogspot.com
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: Xtal Filter +1

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi all,

I believe You are looking for something like tunable xtal front-end
preselector 
which I build for several of my ham friends years ago and posted there:

http://www.radio.qrp.cz/1/clanky06/preseletor.htm

Originaly it was published by Peter, G3IPV in the ham radio magazines
years ago.

The main issue in practice is the small tunning range otherwise it works
like champ.

73 - Petr, OK1RP
---
http://topband.blog.cz



> -Original Message-
> From: topband-boun...@contesting.com
> [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Anton Moehammad
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:39 PM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: Xtal Filter
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
>  I believe there is a 1825 KHZ xtal filter sell somewhere, can any body
>  share their experience about put a narrow XTAL filter in front of their
>  recv ? (CW works only)
> 
> 
> 
> Ir Moeh AntonHendra
> Jambon Tengah no 290 RT1/RW3
> Magelang 56121
> Indonesia
> Mobile : +6285292611160
> email   : moehan...@yahoo.com
> Get a signature like this.  CLICK HERE.
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: ZJ Beverage Box

[Petr Ourednik]

Pete,

all what I have regarding the ZJ bevs kits I posted on my blog here:

http://topband.blog.cz/1011/zj-beverages-and-how-it-works-part-i
http://topband.blog.cz/1011/zj-beverages-and-how-it-works-part-ii

hope it helps,

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:23:00 -0500, "Pete Smith" 
said:
> I have one of these that I want to refurbish for use as an antenna-end 
> preamp for a Beverage on Ground (BOG) RX antenna.  I believe the MMIC 
> amplifier in it is fried, but I do not have any documentation on the 
> unit.  Can anyone help?
> 
> -- 
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> 
> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at
> www.conteststations.com
> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
> reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
> spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 AND now
> at arcluster.reversebeacon.net port 7000
> 
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: Best small space antennas

[Petr Ourednik]

Jim,

in my oppinion the Hi-Z 3el. vertical array with 50' spacing is the best
solution
but the commercial one is very expensive I guess. Try to think about the
home made
system...

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:18:02 -0600, "Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ"
 said:
> With limited space what is the best antenna for 160?  The only room
> available is a 130X50' area.  Ground radials will be nearly impossable to
> put in large enough to be of much value.  1/4 wave antenna tried, very
> narrowband and interfeared with every receiving device in a block.  I may
> just be out of luck.  wb5oxq
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: Receive antenna dilemma

[Petr Ourednik]

Hi,

I do not know what our antenna's gurus will say about that but I can 
recommend DO NOT spend so much money for that "magic" receiving antenna.
Try all the other "free" first > like BOG, loops etc. You will spend 
just few USD and You will get more experiences what works for You and
what
does not work in Your place. Finally if You are looking for some
commercial
then have a look for 3el. Hi-Z array. Even You can do it home made and
works
well > just put it as far as possible each of the verticals apart from
TX ant.

My 2cents...

73 - Petr, OK1RP

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:04:32 -0500, "Mark Lunday" 
said:
> Since I can see that my preliminary BOG installations are not yielding
> satisfactory results, perhaps it is time to look elsewhere.
> 
> The BOG as unerminated, 200 feet long each, on pointed 210 so I can hear
> EU
> off the back.and one pointed 300 so I can also hear Afrida off the back.
> 
> I din't have room for longer BOGs, and I don't see a reason to put up
> beverages of that length as the performance will be sup-optimal.
> 
> So I am looking into other alternatives.   The K9AY would be too close to
> my
> transmitting antenna in the back.
> 
> The DX Engineering 4-pack active receive antenna array package looks
> interesting.  It's a but challenging to get set up, and it's about $1000.
> While I want to get some more activity on 160, I am not sure that this is
> the way to go over my inverted L.  Will it hear that dramatically
> different?
> AA6YQ says he loves his/  I trally need to be sure before I make a large
> investment like this.
> 
> http://www.dxengineering.com/Parts.asp?ID=5255&PLID=255&SecID=117&DeptID={95
> EA549F-3210-474F-84E0-5BE0B267BC4C}&PartNo=DXE%2DRFS%2DSYS%2D4P
> 
> Advice appreciated
> 
> WD4ELG
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: FRONT END PROTECTOR

[Petr Ourednik]

All,

I agree with Bill and KD9SV is nothing more that what BIll is talking
about. 
Just put the relays into the box and connect between radio and
preamp/ant > done.

73 - Petr, OK1RP


On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:49:29 -0400, "Bill and Liz McHugh" 
said:
> I suppose some people who use full break-in want a complicated
> solid-state front-end protector.  I don't use break-in and so a simple
> DPDT relay powered from your transceiver will do the job at almost $0. 
> One side grounds the auxilliary RX antenna port on the transceiver while
> the other grounds the RX antenna feedline.  Foolproof, and you always
> know if it is working since you can hear the relay kick in every time you
> transmit.
> 
> I have been using one of these for many yearsever since my linear
> developed a mind of its own when RF started feeding back into the
> transceiver's auxilliary RX port.  I've never had a problem and it
> protects the front end 100%.  'Course I'm a dinosaur 'cuz I don't use
> full break-in.but I suspect there are many like me!!
> 
> Bill VE3NH/VE3CSK
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: Receiving +1

[Petr Ourednik]

Steve,

as I have also post stam lot for antennas available I tried various
antennas.
I have to say most of them does not work! Mainly because of strong
coupling
between RX and TX antennas on my small lot.
After several years I found that as still effective is W2PM Mini
Diammond loop
or K9FD loop (or similar design) + Half sloper or inverted L antenna
with decent
radials system both on 160m band. You will not be Topband big gun but
You will be 
on the air and even during good condx and serious antenna on the second
side You will
be able to work sometime DXs.

My 2cents aid if it help,

73 - Petr, OK1RP
---
http://topband.blog.cz


On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:22:36 +0300, hodg...@cytanet.com.cy said:
> As I do not have space for a decent receiving
> antenna, what is the consensus of opinion on
> say txing on 160 and rxing on another band,
> what would such a Qso count as ?
> 
> 
> 73 Steve, ZC4Li.
> 
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK