Re: [Trac] Website says to run upgrade, trac-admin says no upgrade necessary
Hi Sue, On Windows with the BitNami Stack you will need to execute and dditional step. Please check the section 8.3.1 Installing Trac plugins and Python eggs - NOTE FOR WINDOWS USERS in the README file: http://bitnami.org/files/stacks/trac/0.11.6-1/README.txt. Best regards, Victoria. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:52 AM, sue sue.sml2...@gmail.com wrote: I'm at a loss as to why this is happening. I installed the defaultcc plugin and all of a sudden this error occurred. I have tried restarting all of the services to no avail. I have disabled ALL plugins in the trac.ini to see if that would help, and nothing is working. this is just a prototype installation, so I can create a new one if necessary, but I'd like to understand why this happened so that i can avoid it in the future. This is a Windows 2007 bitNami 11.6 installation. The only other plugins in play were blackmagictweaks and customfieldadmin. Thanks in advance. Sue -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac + Ldap - Restricted mode error
Noah Kantrowitz skrev 14. sep. 2010 19:51:
-Original Message-
From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Jon Hadley
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 12:41 AM
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Trac] Trac + Ldap - Restricted mode error
I'm trying to setup Trac, using mod_wsgi, LDAP and a xml theming proxy
called collective.xdv.
(...)
2) LDAP on Trac only works via port 8202, not via 8022. Fairly
obviously because that's where the rule is set-up. But the rest of the
site on 8022 doesn't need to be LDAP protected. How do I apply the
LDAP authentication behind the proxy? Can the proxy somehow inherit
the authentication rule when Trac is requested? (More detail regarding
this problem is also here: http://serverfault.com/questions/180845 )
To answer #2, HTTP authentication is a local system only, it does not
work with proxies like that.
I first thought you wanted the following:
, ldap auth -- trac
user - (xml theme proxy )
' cms website
In addition, you want to map /trac into the url-space under your other
site, so that:
1: All requests arrive at www.example.com
2: All requests are transformed/formatted by the xml proxy
3: An url starting with /trac:
1: should be served from the trac instance
2: should be authenticated via ldap
However, as far as I can tell collective.xdv is just a post-hook for
plone ? So all you want is to have separate mapping of /trac, and
everything else, going through an apache server, with the /trac part
authenticated by ldap ?
Should be as easy as:
VirtualHost www.example.com
ServerName www.example.com
ProxyRequests Off
# Do not proxy /trac using mod_http_proxy, use wsgi (which is a kind
of reverse proxy)
ProxyPass /trac !
Location /trac
AuthBasicProvider ldap
AuthType Basic
AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off
AuthName Login
AuthLDAPURL ldap://127.0.0.1:389/dc=foo-bar,dc=org?uid;
AuthLDAPBindDN cn=admin, dc=foo-bar, dc=org
AuthLDAPBindPassword secretword
require valid-user
/Location
Location /
#Assuming you’ve got plone running on port 8001
ProxyPass 127.0.0.1:8001
ProxyPassReverse 127.0.0.1:8001
/Location
/VirtualHost
#WSGIDaemonProcess causes prob if this not outside
WSGIDaemonProcess trac stack-size=524288
python-path=/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
WSGIScriptAlias /trac /home/web/foo/parts/trac/tracwsgi/cgi-bin/trac.wsgi
WSGIProcessGroup trac #changed from global
WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}
I’m not entirely sure I’ve really grasped your problem though. In
general, if you want a more complicated setup, I would suggest not
cramming everything into one apache config instance, but rather set
everything up as if you were setting up seperate servers.
Then you’d have one apache in front, as reverse proxy, and
possibly doing url rewrite and/or ssl-proxy “accelleration” – and other
instances mounting up wsgi etc.
It might be more overhead, but a lot easier to manage (and scale out to
new servers).
Best regards,
--
.---. Eirik Schwenke eirik.schwe...@nsd.uib.no
( NSD ) Harald Hårfagresgate 29Rom 150
'---' N-5007 Bergentlf: (555) 889 13
GPG-key at pgp.mit.edu Id 0x8AA3392C
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Trac] Trac + Ldap - Restricted mode error
Hi Eirik, Thanks for the time you've spent looking into my problem, it's much appreciated. I first thought you wanted the following: , ldap auth -- trac user - (xml theme proxy ) ' cms website Exactly what I want. 3: An url starting with /trac: 1: should be served from the trac instance 2: should be authenticated via ldap Should be served from the trac instance, *VIA* the xml theme proxy. However, as far as I can tell collective.xdv is just a post-hook for plone ? No, it sits in front of Trac too. (In fact it can sit in front of any website, which is where it's potential power comes from). But this is where my trouble begins. As soon as collective.xdv is in front of Trac, the authentication system fails. I'm not sure if collective.xdv is stripping authentication headers, or if there is a better way of Apache controlling the route of the authentication requests. Should be as easy as: Your included configuration works great, if I don't want Trac themed by the collective.xdv proxy but have it appear on the same address, but as detailed above, this isn't my end goal (although it might have to be Plan B) I would suggest not cramming everything into one apache config instance, but rather set everything up as if you were setting up seperate servers. Good advice :) Jon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] Pulling account info from a PostgreSQL DB
Hello list,
I've got a trac 0.11.1 setup running, with basic HTTP auth running
against a
Drupal database in PostgreSQL, with the following setup in my Apache
configuration:
Location /trac/login
AuthType Basic
AuthName Trac Auth
AuthBasicAuthoritative Off
Auth_PG_host localhost
Auth_PG_port 5432
Auth_PG_user drupal
Auth_PG_pwd **
Auth_PG_database drupal
Auth_PG_pwd_table users
Auth_PG_uid_field name
Auth_PG_pwd_field pass
Auth_PG_pwd_whereclause and users.status = 1 and users.access
0
AUTH_PG_hash_type MD5
Require valid-user
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}
/Location
This works perfectly fine, except that users do not have email
addresses
associated with them. I want to be able to somehow pull the user's
email
addressed out of the database as well, so that things like ticket
creation/updates can be configured to send emails.
I looked at the AccountManagerPlugin, but I'm not sure that provides
what I
need to accomplish this. Can anyone recommend something else that
might do
this?
Sorry if this is the second time anyone is getting this - the fist
copy of it seem to have disappeared.
Thanks,
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] Deleting Old Reports
After a report has been entered and if it has an error there appears to be no way to remove it, i.e. there is no delete button which means we have too many old reports and would like do some housekeeping. Can someone please advise. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Pulling account info from a PostgreSQL DB
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:31 PM, mgl mgl@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
I've got a trac 0.11.1 setup running, with basic HTTP auth running
against a
Drupal database in PostgreSQL, with the following setup in my Apache
configuration:
Location /trac/login
AuthType Basic
AuthName Trac Auth
AuthBasicAuthoritative Off
Auth_PG_host localhost
Auth_PG_port 5432
Auth_PG_user drupal
Auth_PG_pwd **
Auth_PG_database drupal
Auth_PG_pwd_table users
Auth_PG_uid_field name
Auth_PG_pwd_field pass
Auth_PG_pwd_whereclause and users.status = 1 and users.access
0
AUTH_PG_hash_type MD5
Require valid-user
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}
/Location
This works perfectly fine, except that users do not have email
addresses
associated with them. I want to be able to somehow pull the user's
email
addressed out of the database as well, so that things like ticket
creation/updates can be configured to send emails.
I looked at the AccountManagerPlugin, but I'm not sure that provides
what I
need to accomplish this. Can anyone recommend something else that
might do
this?
Maybe this will be helpful?
http://www.pacopablo.com/blog/pacopablo/blog/set-assign-to-drop-down
Sorry if this is the second time anyone is getting this - the fist
copy of it seem to have disappeared.
Thanks,
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Trac Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comtrac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, steven.rogers steven.rog...@honeywell.comwrote: After a report has been entered and if it has an error there appears to be no way to remove it, i.e. there is no delete button which means we have too many old reports and would like do some housekeeping. Can someone please advise. You need REPORT_DELETE permission, see: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracPermissions#Reports -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comtrac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
Erik, I added REPORT_DELETE separately but it did not help. Please note I am as a user with group_Admin which also has REPORT_ADMIN? Thanks Steve From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Erik Andersson Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:37 AM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, steven.rogers steven.rog...@honeywell.com wrote: After a report has been entered and if it has an error there appears to be no way to remove it, i.e. there is no delete button which means we have too many old reports and would like do some housekeeping. Can someone please advise. You need REPORT_DELETE permission, see: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracPermissions#Reports -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:trac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
(Replying top because he did) Could the solution be something a simple as this? You need to open the report first before you see the delete button. Michelle On 9/15/2010 1:44 PM, Rogers, Steven (TX57) wrote: Erik, I added REPORT_DELETE separately but it did not help. Please note I am as a user with group_Admin which also has REPORT_ADMIN? Thanks Steve *From:* trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Erik Andersson *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:37 AM *To:* trac-users@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, steven.rogers steven.rog...@honeywell.com mailto:steven.rog...@honeywell.com wrote: After a report has been entered and if it has an error there appears to be no way to remove it, i.e. there is no delete button which means we have too many old reports and would like do some housekeeping. Can someone please advise. You need REPORT_DELETE permission, see: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracPermissions#Reports -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com mailto:trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:trac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
_ From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rogers, Steven (TX57) Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports Erik, I added REPORT_DELETE separately but it did not help. Please note I am as a user with group_Admin which also has REPORT_ADMIN? Thanks Steve If you are using Trac 0.12, you must enable the TicketDeleter module. Select Admin, then Plugins in the General section, select Trac and activate TicketDeleter (the last module). Hope that helps. /Mikael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
On 09/15/2010 01:55 PM, Rogers, Steven (TX57) wrote: I wish it was, please see below for report-26 which has an error, there is no button to delete it in this view. When that happens to me, I just fix it in the DB. Replace the query with that works, and then you get a nice UI with delete button. -- Matthew Caron Build Engineer Sixnet | www.sixnet.com O +1 518 877 5173 Ext. 138 F +1 518 602 9209 matt.ca...@sixnet.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
_ From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mikael Relbe Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:56 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports _ From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rogers, Steven (TX57) Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports Erik, I added REPORT_DELETE separately but it did not help. Please note I am as a user with group_Admin which also has REPORT_ADMIN? Thanks Steve If you are using Trac 0.12, you must enable the TicketDeleter module. Select Admin, then Plugins in the General section, select Trac and activate TicketDeleter (the last module). Hope that helps. /Mikael Sorry, but I misread the OT for ticket instead of report. Please disregard my answer. (Tired after a long day at work...) /Mikael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac + Ldap - Restricted mode error
Jon Hadley skrev 15. sep. 2010 14:51: Hi Eirik, Thanks for the time you've spent looking into my problem, it's much appreciated. NP :) I first thought you wanted the following: , ldap auth -- trac user - (xml theme proxy ) ' cms website Exactly what I want. Ok -- then I can better understand why you're having problems ;-) 3: An url starting with /trac: 1: should be served from the trac instance 2: should be authenticated via ldap Should be served from the trac instance, *VIA* the xml theme proxy. However, as far as I can tell collective.xdv is just a post-hook for plone ? No, it sits in front of Trac too. (In fact it can sit in front of any website, which is where it's potential power comes from). But this is where my trouble begins. As soon as collective.xdv is in front of Trac, the authentication system fails. I'm not sure if collective.xdv is stripping authentication headers, or if there is a better way of Apache controlling the route of the authentication requests. From the collective.xdv-page (and as far as I can tell from your configs posted here, and at stackoverflow) -- it isn't obvious how you've set this up -- this is a python script that acts as a proxy ? Are you using: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/dv.xdvserver wrapped around trac ? Do you run that via mod_wsgi, or some other means ? Based on: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html 13.5.1 End-to-end and Hop-by-hop Headers For the purpose of defining the behavior of caches and non-caching proxies, we divide HTTP headers into two categories: - End-to-end headers, which are transmitted to the ultimate recipient of a request or response. End-to-end headers in responses MUST be stored as part of a cache entry and MUST be transmitted in any response formed from a cache entry. - Hop-by-hop headers, which are meaningful only for a single transport-level connection, and are not stored by caches or forwarded by proxies. The following HTTP/1.1 headers are hop-by-hop headers: - Connection - Keep-Alive - Proxy-Authenticate - Proxy-Authorization - TE - Trailers - Transfer-Encoding - Upgrade All other headers defined by HTTP/1.1 are end-to-end headers. As far as i can tell a reverse proxy actually should forward http authorization headers -- so it would appear collective.xvd is the problem, not mod_proxy (Note authorization and proxy-authorization are different headers). Should be as easy as: Your included configuration works great, if I don't want Trac themed by the collective.xdv proxy but have it appear on the same address, but as detailed above, this isn't my end goal (although it might have to be Plan B) I would suggest not cramming everything into one apache config instance, but rather set everything up as if you were setting up seperate servers. Good advice :) This does remind me a bit about: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/ by the way -- but that or mod_proxy_xml might not be able to do quite what you want (apply your xml styles). Perhaps collective.xvd can be made to work with mod_ext_filter ?: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ext_filter.html Best regards, -- .---. Eirik Schwenke eirik.schwe...@nsd.uib.no ( NSD ) Harald Hårfagresgate 29Rom 150 '---' N-5007 Bergentlf: (555) 889 13 GPG-key at pgp.mit.edu Id 0x8AA3392C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
Rogers, Steven (TX57) wrote: I wish it was, please see below for report-26 which has an error, there is no button to delete it in this view. This looks like an issue with the BlackMagicTicketTweaks plugin. Disable it temporarily and you may be able to delete the report. -- Remy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Trac] Pulling account info from a PostgreSQL DB
That sort-of might help, but from what I can tell it's something that would
have to be run for each new user. I'd have to find some way to make Drupal
execute that script for each new user that signs up. Also, wouldn't each user
have to set the session for themselves, or will it automatically be set to
their username?
In any case, I was hoping for something a little more directly integrated or
automated. That is, I'd rather Trac pulled the email from my Drupal database
somehow, rather than having to use a method that requires somehow pushing
email address information into Trac.
Thanks,
Mike
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:35:32 Erik Andersson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:31 PM, mgl mgl@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
I've got a trac 0.11.1 setup running, with basic HTTP auth running
against a
Drupal database in PostgreSQL, with the following setup in my Apache
configuration:
Location /trac/login
AuthType Basic
AuthName Trac Auth
AuthBasicAuthoritative Off
Auth_PG_host localhost
Auth_PG_port 5432
Auth_PG_user drupal
Auth_PG_pwd **
Auth_PG_database drupal
Auth_PG_pwd_table users
Auth_PG_uid_field name
Auth_PG_pwd_field pass
Auth_PG_pwd_whereclause and users.status = 1 and users.access
0
AUTH_PG_hash_type MD5
Require valid-user
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}
/Location
This works perfectly fine, except that users do not have email
addresses
associated with them. I want to be able to somehow pull the user's
email
addressed out of the database as well, so that things like ticket
creation/updates can be configured to send emails.
I looked at the AccountManagerPlugin, but I'm not sure that provides
what I
need to accomplish this. Can anyone recommend something else that
might do
this?
Maybe this will be helpful?
http://www.pacopablo.com/blog/pacopablo/blog/set-assign-to-drop-down
Sorry if this is the second time anyone is getting this - the fist
copy of it seem to have disappeared.
Thanks,
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Trac Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comtrac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegr
oups.com .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports
Can you please advise how to do that, I have admin rights but cannot find how edit a plugin, please note we are Trac 0.11.7 Thanks Steve -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Remy Blank Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:15 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Trac] Deleting Old Reports Rogers, Steven (TX57) wrote: I wish it was, please see below for report-26 which has an error, there is no button to delete it in this view. This looks like an issue with the BlackMagicTicketTweaks plugin. Disable it temporarily and you may be able to delete the report. -- Remy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] Rationale of TitleIndex Hierarchy?
Hello, I'm currently using 0.11 and I'm not thrilled with the way that [[TitleIndex(format=group)]] formats my wiki page hierarchy. For example, the following hierarchy: /A /A/A /A/A/A /A/A/B /A/A/C would be displayed like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * / * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * / * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) After looking at 0.12, it looks like it would format it like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) Also in 0.12 is the format=hierarchy option, which formats it like this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) The last one is almost exactly what I want, which is this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) So the question I have is: Is it possible to accomplish what I'm looking for? If not (or in addition to), what's the rationale behind the duplicate links in the hierarchy format? Thanks in advance. -Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] Tables in multi column wiki page
I'm trying to create a wiki page that contains tables side by side as in a
two column page format. I'm using trac 0.12. In order to do this I set up a
page using nested tables. The following sample code works successfully with
one caveat. The outer table (which is otherwise not visible) is surrounded
by a border. I'd like to remove this border. It seems logical to wrap the
code using a {{{#!table processor with appropriate styles, but trac errors
out with the message:
!#table must contain at most one table
Is there any way to get around this? Is there a better processor to use than
{{{#!td? Unfortunately because of the way the table processor is
implemented, it seems impossible to apply any styles, classes to the outer
table if there are any nested tables.
Working code with undesired surrounding border:
{{{#!td
style=border:none;vertical-align:top;padding-right:100px;padding-left:20px;
padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px
= Left Side Table =
||='''Column L.A''' =||='''Column L.B'''=||
||Some data||Some more data||
||Miscellaneous stuff||More data||
||Useless info||Stuff||
||Even more stuff||Data||
||Another line||Sample||
}}}
{{{#!td
style=border:none;vertical-align:top;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px;p
adding-right:20px
= '''Right Side Table''' =
||='''Column R.A'''=||='''Column R.B'''=||
||Some data||Some more data||
||Miscellaneous stuff||More data||
[[br]]
= '''Second Table on Right''' =
||='''Column R.C'''=||='''Column R.D'''=||
||Some data||Some more data||
||Miscellaneous stuff||More data||
}}}
Thanks,
-- Bill --
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Rationale of TitleIndex Hierarchy?
I don't understand the duplicate links either in regards to using format=hierarchy. Is there a fix for this? Thank you. On Sep 15, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Eric Hoch wrote: Hello, I'm currently using 0.11 and I'm not thrilled with the way that [[TitleIndex(format=group)]] formats my wiki page hierarchy. For example, the following hierarchy: /A /A/A /A/A/A /A/A/B /A/A/C would be displayed like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * / * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * / * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) After looking at 0.12, it looks like it would format it like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) Also in 0.12 is the format=hierarchy option, which formats it like this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) The last one is almost exactly what I want, which is this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) So the question I have is: Is it possible to accomplish what I'm looking for? If not (or in addition to), what's the rationale behind the duplicate links in the hierarchy format? Thanks in advance. -Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. ... Zeeshan Lakhani Liberty Science Center Twitter:@zeeshanlakhani 917-885-7668 - Cell 201-253-1576 - LSC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Rationale of TitleIndex Hierarchy?
On 9/16/2010 12:31 AM, Eric Hoch wrote: Hello, I'm currently using 0.11 and I'm not thrilled with the way that [[TitleIndex(format=group)]] formats my wiki page hierarchy. For example, the following hierarchy: /A /A/A /A/A/A /A/A/B /A/A/C would be displayed like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * / * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * / * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) After looking at 0.12, it looks like it would format it like this: * A * A (linked to /A) * A * A/A (linked to /A/A) * A/A/A (linked to /A/A/A) * A/A/B (linked to /A/A/B) * A/A/C (linked to /A/A/C) Also in 0.12 is the format=hierarchy option, which formats it like this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) The last one is almost exactly what I want, which is this: * A (linked to /A) * A (linked to /A/A) * A (linked to /A/A/A) * B (linked to /A/A/B) * C (linked to /A/A/C) So the question I have is: Is it possible to accomplish what I'm looking for? If not (or in addition to), what's the rationale behind the duplicate links in the hierarchy format? Thanks for the input! There are a couple of bugs already reported with those two formats, so I'll try to finish the fixes I've started a while ago in time for 0.12.1 (with most probably a rc1 beginning next week). -- Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Tables in multi column wiki page
On 9/15/2010 6:48 PM, Bill Buklis wrote:
I'm trying to create a wiki page that contains tables side by side as
in a two column page format. I'm using trac 0.12. In order to do this
I set up a page using nested tables. The following sample code works
successfully with one caveat. The outer table (which is otherwise not
visible) is surrounded by a border. I'd like to remove this border. It
seems logical to wrap the code using a {{{#!table processor with
appropriate styles, but trac errors out with the message:
*!#table must contain at most one table*
Is there any way to get around this?
Unfortunately no, that's indeed a limitation of #!table in 0.12. Wait
for 0.13?
Is there a better processor to use than {{{#!td? Unfortunately
because of the way the table processor is implemented, it seems
impossible to apply any styles, classes to the outer table if there
are any nested tables.
A workaround would be to wrap your setup in some div (e.g. #!div
class=borderless), and do something appropriate in your site.css (e.g.
.borderless table { border: none }).
Alternatively, you can easily achieve multi-column set up by using #!div
style=float: left, width=45% and such.
Working code with undesired surrounding border:
{{{#!td
style=border:none;vertical-align:top;padding-right:100px;padding-left:20px;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px
= Left Side Table =
||='''Column L.A''' =||='''Column L.B'''=||
Hope this helps!
-- Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
