Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-07-31 Thread nodrm . ever
You did not lose me. Having done much research on DRM and Trusted Computing,  
I am quite aware my custom-build cannot avoid all hardware-based DRM. What a  
custom-build can do is avoid majority of it, and through erasing all  
software-based DRM that one can, most of the unavoidable hardware-based DRM  
can be disabled, or at least mitigated. What DRM survives this process I can  
live with...at least until some Megamind cracker discovers a fix. You do what  
you can with what you have to work with...sometimes there is no perfect  
solution (yet). I focus on what I can do. For example, I may not be able to  
eliminate DRM code in the XP Pro 'kernel', but I have found out how to  
eliminate most of the rest, and that is a lot of DRM crud! 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-07-31 Thread nodrm . ever
I  think I have maybe found a way to use Trisquel as my OS, yet avoid the  
ordeal of teaching myself how to recompile/reconfigure the kernel, but being  
a newbie, I would like feedback from experienced users before I pursue a  
possible dead-end.


Google searches indicate that INTEL_TXT.TXT, CONFIG_INTEL_TXT, etc., did not  
port into Linux until kernel version 2.6.32, so I am thinking that if I use  
Trisquel 3.5 or 3.0.1, the Intel code will not be present (Distrowatch lists  
Trisquel 3.5 as having kernel version 2.6.31, and Trisquel 3.0.1 using kernel  
2.6.28). What do you all think of this? Advice welcomed!


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-07-19 Thread nodrm . ever
Thanks for your comment. In fact, I am concerned with both, which is one  
reason I am doing custom-build. Unfortunately, it appears to me that there is  
no way to completely avoid hardware DRM, now that AMD has become a TCG  
groupie, so erasing any software based crud is even more essential to deprive  
hardware its support.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-07-19 Thread chris
I think I lost you. As mentioned earlier you can't custom build a system  
entirely free of these issues. You can't buy an older system free of these  
issues. So what exactly are you going to custom build?


Even the older systems have pieces like this.

You are going to run into issues with:
1. Wireless Cards (digital restrictions)
2. Graphics chipsets (non-free software dependencies)
3. Non-free BIOS
4. Non-free microcode (you can't just buy a system without this, it's in all  
x86 systems)

5. Trusted Computing
6. Remote management features (related to the BIOS)
7. Some other stuff I can't remember that we are working on... fixing... or  
trying to.
8. Some other stuff I can't remember that we are working on... fixing... or  
trying to.







Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-07-19 Thread chris
Unless I'm mistaken the Intel DRM stuff is avoidable. Don't confuse graphics  
DRM with digital restrictions management. If we are talking about the  
Trusted Computing piece you just need to verify the CPU doesn't contain it.  
Even with the latest generation Intel CPU line up there are models without  
Trusted Computing. There is also the TPM component in the BIOS. We are  
trying to ship without this in our laptops. Still waiting to hear back from a  
third party working with us on the issue.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-30 Thread chris

Yea- that is it.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-30 Thread yeeehi
Is an Intel CPU with the absolutely appaling TXT technology on its own  
impotent? Does it require support from the chipset/motherboard to actually  
function? Are there many motherboards/chipsets that allow you to turn off the  
functionality of the TXT hardware?





Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-30 Thread mikko . viinamaki

At least some models with a TPM can disable it in the BIOS settings.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-30 Thread chris
I don't consider TXT to really be a deciding factor. I think having a system  
that works with free software is the number one priority. TXT is avoidable  
and so we should avoid it. However the handful of users who are avoiding the  
technology are not relevant to Intel. It's just too small a customer base.


The thing is there isn't much we can do individually right now to discourage  
this kind of technology. Even if we all individually purchased systems  
without TXT it wouldn't have an impact.


The best way to discourage this is by creating new companies that apply free  
software philosophy. If these companies get large enough they will have an  
influence on the market.


Right now there aren't a whole lot of companies though... I can think of  
maybe two and I run one. The other is www.eztakes.com.




Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-29 Thread chris
You are looking at it from the wrong angle I think. While the libre-kernel  
should really have this disabled in the software too the hardware is what you  
should be concerned about. At least at the moment you can avoid the Intel  
CPUs with support for Trusted Computing. We stopped shipping laptops with  
it months(?) ago. You have to check the processor on the Intel web site to  
find out if it has this featured. I forget what it is called exactly although  
you can spot it in the specs.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-27 Thread mikko . viinamaki
That is correct. However, it is not half as complicated as people think,  
especially if doing such a trivial change. Here's a guide to do just that I  
wrote while I was using Debian.  
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16t=36525 I suggest you try it,  
even if just for fun and learning.


Y means integrated into the kernel and always active
M means built as module and activated if required
N means not included in any form

Those configs mentioned seem to be under device drivers  character devices.  
You might want to take a look at the other configs as well. Some of them are  
fairly easy to select while other remain esoteric for the rest of our  
combined lives!


Having said that I'm not sure if having those configs enabled does have any  
ill effects. Trusted computing does have very nasty potential uses (DRM etc)  
but I doubt Trisquel has any software that would use it for such purposes.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-26 Thread nodrm . ever
So I assume that to totally erase the configuration items you listed requires  
me to learn how to rebuild or reconfigure the kernal at the least? Looks to  
be quite a daunting task for a newbie.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Trusted Computing

2012-06-25 Thread nodrm . ever
I'm an XP Pro user looking to switch to Linux. I have asked on other forums  
if there is any distro  kernel version that is 100% free of this 'Trusted  
Computing' junk, and was recommended Trisquel. So my first question here is  
can anyone confirm that Trisquel contains absolutely no Trusted Computing  
kernel configuration items, modules, drivers, etc.?