Re: Adding an implementation processor
Hi, Do we plan to move the ImplementationProcessor framework to the SPI module? When I'm working on the databindings, it comes out some requirements for extensibility on annotion processing as well. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tuscany Dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:35 PM Subject: Adding an implementation processor In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to META-INF/tuscany/implementation.scdl: component name=implementation.Callback system:implementation.system class=org.apache.tuscany.core.implementation.processor.CallbackProcessor/ /component However, when testing, I see that the CallbackProcessor only seems to be called for system methods but not for application methods. For instance, I see that RefererenceProcessor gets called for setMyService but CallbackProcessor does not, whereas both processors get called for setMonitor. One thing that I am not sure about is what to do with the component name implementation.Callback in implementation.scdl, if that has any bearing at all. Any ideas as to what I may be missing to get CallbackProcessor to be called for methods like setMyService? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding an implementation processor
In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to META-INF/tuscany/implementation.scdl: component name=implementation.Callback system:implementation.system class=org.apache.tuscany.core.implementation.processor.CallbackProcessor/ /component However, when testing, I see that the CallbackProcessor only seems to be called for system methods but not for application methods. For instance, I see that RefererenceProcessor gets called for setMyService but CallbackProcessor does not, whereas both processors get called for setMonitor. One thing that I am not sure about is what to do with the component name implementation.Callback in implementation.scdl, if that has any bearing at all. Any ideas as to what I may be missing to get CallbackProcessor to be called for methods like setMyService? Thanks
Re: Adding an implementation processor
Hi Ignacio, Can you create a JIRA and attach the code so I can take a look? Jim On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to META-INF/tuscany/ implementation.scdl: component name=implementation.Callback system:implementation.system class=org.apache.tuscany.core.implementation.processor.CallbackProces sor/ /component However, when testing, I see that the CallbackProcessor only seems to be called for system methods but not for application methods. For instance, I see that RefererenceProcessor gets called for setMyService but CallbackProcessor does not, whereas both processors get called for setMonitor. One thing that I am not sure about is what to do with the component name implementation.Callback in implementation.scdl, if that has any bearing at all. Any ideas as to what I may be missing to get CallbackProcessor to be called for methods like setMyService? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding an implementation processor
Yes, I have already created the JIRA, will attach in a min, but I was hoping maybe there was a quick fix off of someone's head. Anyhow, will do. - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: Re: Adding an implementation processor Hi Ignacio, Can you create a JIRA and attach the code so I can take a look? Jim On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: In the process of adding support for callbacks, I am adding a CallbackProcessor to pick up a callback name and member when visiting a field or a method. I added a call to register the CallbackProcessor from DefaultBoostrappers's createIntrospector, and I added the following entry to META-INF/tuscany/ implementation.scdl: component name=implementation.Callback system:implementation.system class=org.apache.tuscany.core.implementation.processor.CallbackProces sor/ /component However, when testing, I see that the CallbackProcessor only seems to be called for system methods but not for application methods. For instance, I see that RefererenceProcessor gets called for setMyService but CallbackProcessor does not, whereas both processors get called for setMonitor. One thing that I am not sure about is what to do with the component name implementation.Callback in implementation.scdl, if that has any bearing at all. Any ideas as to what I may be missing to get CallbackProcessor to be called for methods like setMyService? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
