Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-19 Thread kelvin goodson

16 is done,  will now do ...
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
that leaves ...

2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

I think perhaps also we should make a quick fox for tuscany-1146 (samples
don't compile with java 1.4.2)

Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


12 is done

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Oops,  I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done.  I'm back looking at
 12 now.
 Kelvin.

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  11 seemed to be a no-op
  13 is done
  14 is done
 
  leaving ...
 
  2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
  3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
  have equivalent fixes in the branch
  6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
  10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
  12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
  15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back
  to central instructions for running samples
  16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
  17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
 
 
  On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but
   not to the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release phase if you
   could create a patch of your local workspace when working in the trunk
   before committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the task of
   porting to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to the
   branch too.
  
   Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 =
   tasks 11, 12, 13, 14
  
   Regards, Kelvin.
  
   On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were badly
numbered as 12,13,14 -- doh!)
   
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was
made have equivalent fixes in the branch
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to
the get involved page
14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point
back to central instructions for running samples
16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
   
I'm going to tackle 3 now
   
Kelvin.
   
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its
 easy to reference them

 I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9

 1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will
 fix this as per my note to tuscany-dev
 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
 results
 3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was
 made have equivalent fixes in the branch

 the following have been raised by comments on RC1

 4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure
 no disclaimer contained)
 5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed
 jiras
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 7 should remove EPL license from src distro
 8 add stax reference in bin distro license
 9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
 10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and
 ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
 12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
 13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to
 the get involved page
 14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into
 overview.html

 and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
 12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point
 back to central instructions for running samples
 13 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
 14 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

 Regards, Kelvin

 On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL 

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-19 Thread kelvin goodson

Of course I meant fix, not fox,  and more importantly TUSCANY-1446, not 1146

Kelvin.

On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


16 is done,  will now do ...
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
that leaves ...

2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

I think perhaps also we should make a quick fox for tuscany-1146 (samples
don't compile with java 1.4.2)

Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 12 is done

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Oops,  I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done.  I'm back looking
  at 12 now.
  Kelvin.
 
  On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   11 seemed to be a no-op
   13 is done
   14 is done
  
   leaving ...
  
   2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
   3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
   have equivalent fixes in the branch
   6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
   10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
   12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
   15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back
   to central instructions for running samples
   16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
   17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
  
  
   On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but
not to the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release phase if 
you
could create a patch of your local workspace when working in the trunk
before committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the task 
of
porting to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to the
branch too.
   
Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 =
tasks 11, 12, 13, 14
   
Regards, Kelvin.
   
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
 so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were badly
 numbered as 12,13,14 -- doh!)

 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
 results
 3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was
 made have equivalent fixes in the branch
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
 12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
 13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to
 the get involved page
 14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into
 overview.html
 15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point
 back to central instructions for running samples
 16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
 17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

 I'm going to tackle 3 now

 Kelvin.

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its
  easy to reference them
 
  I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9
 
  1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will
  fix this as per my note to tuscany-dev
  2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
  results
  3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch
  was made have equivalent fixes in the branch
 
  the following have been raised by comments on RC1
 
  4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and
  ensure no disclaimer contained)
  5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed
  jiras
  6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 
  7 should remove EPL license from src distro
  8 add stax reference in bin distro license
  9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
  10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and
  ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
  11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
  12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
  13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point
  to the get involved page
  14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into
  overview.html
 
  and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
  12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to
  

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-19 Thread kelvin goodson

I did 15 and am now looking at applying T-1429
Kelvin.

On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Of course I meant fix, not fox,  and more importantly TUSCANY-1446, not
1146

Kelvin.

On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 16 is done,  will now do ...
 15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
 central instructions for running samples
 that leaves ...

 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

 I think perhaps also we should make a quick fox for tuscany-1146
 (samples don't compile with java 1.4.2)

 Kelvin.

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  12 is done
 
  On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Oops,  I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done.  I'm back
   looking at 12 now.
   Kelvin.
  
   On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
11 seemed to be a no-op
13 is done
14 is done
   
leaving ...
   
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was
made have equivalent fixes in the branch
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point
back to central instructions for running samples
16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
   
   
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk
 but not to the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release 
phase if
 you could create a patch of your local workspace when working in the 
trunk
 before committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the 
task of
 porting to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to 
the
 branch too.

 Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 =
 tasks 11, 12, 13, 14

 Regards, Kelvin.

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
  so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were
  badly numbered as 12,13,14 -- doh!)
 
  2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
  results
  3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch
  was made have equivalent fixes in the branch
  6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 
  10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux
  env
  11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
  12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
  13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point
  to the get involved page
  14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into
  overview.html
  15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to
  point back to central instructions for running samples
  16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
  17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario
  sample
 
  I'm going to tackle 3 now
 
  Kelvin.
 
  On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that
   its easy to reference them
  
   I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9
  
   1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I
   will fix this as per my note to tuscany-dev
   2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
   results
   3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch
   was made have equivalent fixes in the branch
  
   the following have been raised by comments on RC1
  
   4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and
   ensure no disclaimer contained)
   5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and
   fixed jiras
   6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng
   13/7)
   7 should remove EPL license from src distro
   8 add stax reference in bin distro license
   9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
   10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and
   ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
   11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
   12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples
   javadoc
   13 fix link back to tuscany site from 

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson

I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its easy to
reference them

I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9

1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix this as
per my note to tuscany-dev
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made have
equivalent fixes in the branch

the following have been raised by comments on RC1

4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no
disclaimer contained)
5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
7 should remove EPL license from src distro
8 add stax reference in bin distro license
9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that the
runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
involved page
14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html

and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
13 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
14 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

Regards, Kelvin

On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of getting this
release out.  Please help with some of these TODOs if you can.  If you plan
to tackle anything please post here so that we don't overlap;  I'll do the
same.

these are the things that I think are must-fix

1143 -- the issues re test failures are being resolved   -- david's
working on this
1429 -- i've looked at this and it is fine apart from the casting to
HelperContextImpls -- i put a note on the jira,
1428 -- note appended to jira asking for code to exercise/demonstrate the
fix

other issues raised on the list

the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix this as
per my note to tuscany-dev
use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made have
equivalent fixes in the branch

the following have been raised by comments on RC1

NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no
disclaimer contained)
need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
should remove EPL license from src distro
add stax reference in bin distro license
add readme to bin distro samples folder
fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that the
runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
involved page
incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html

and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample




[1]
b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make
sense.
How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users
learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available
to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be

extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features.
Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany
mailing list or join us and contribute to this project get involved
link.


Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson

I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but not to
the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release phase if you could
create a patch of your local workspace when working in the trunk before
committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the task of porting
to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to the branch too.

Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 = tasks 11,
12, 13, 14

Regards, Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were badly numbered
as 12,13,14 -- doh!)

2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made have
equivalent fixes in the branch
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
involved page
14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

I'm going to tackle 3 now

Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its easy to
 reference them

 I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9

 1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix this
 as per my note to tuscany-dev
 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
 3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
 have equivalent fixes in the branch

 the following have been raised by comments on RC1

 4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no
 disclaimer contained)
 5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 7 should remove EPL license from src distro
 8 add stax reference in bin distro license
 9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
 10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that
 the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
 12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
 13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
 involved page
 14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html

 and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
 12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
 central instructions for running samples
 13 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
 14 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

 Regards, Kelvin

 On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras
  being added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent
  fixe, so we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of
  getting this release out.  Please help with some of these TODOs if you can.
  If you plan to tackle anything please post here so that we don't overlap;
  I'll do the same.
 
  these are the things that I think are must-fix
 
  1143 -- the issues re test failures are being resolved   -- david's
  working on this
  1429 -- i've looked at this and it is fine apart from the casting to
  HelperContextImpls -- i put a note on the jira,
  1428 -- note appended to jira asking for code to exercise/demonstrate
  the fix
 
  other issues raised on the list
 
  the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix this
  as per my note to tuscany-dev
  use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
  check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
  have equivalent fixes in the branch
 
  the following have been raised by comments on RC1
 
  NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no
  disclaimer contained)
  need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
  need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
  should remove EPL license from src distro
  add stax reference in bin distro license
  add readme to bin distro samples folder
  fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that
  the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
  fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
  exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
  fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
  involved page
  incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into 

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson

11 seemed to be a no-op
13 is done
14 is done

leaving ...

2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made have
equivalent fixes in the branch
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
central instructions for running samples
16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample


On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but not to
the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release phase if you could
create a patch of your local workspace when working in the trunk before
committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the task of porting
to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to the branch too.

Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 = tasks 11,
12, 13, 14

Regards, Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
 so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were badly
 numbered as 12,13,14 -- doh!)

 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
 3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
 have equivalent fixes in the branch
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
 12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
 13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
 involved page
 14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
 15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
 central instructions for running samples
 16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
 17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample

 I'm going to tackle 3 now

 Kelvin.

 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its easy to
  reference them
 
  I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9
 
  1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix
  this as per my note to tuscany-dev
  2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
  3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
  have equivalent fixes in the branch
 
  the following have been raised by comments on RC1
 
  4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no
  disclaimer contained)
  5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
  6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
  7 should remove EPL license from src distro
  8 add stax reference in bin distro license
  9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
  10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that
  the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
  11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
  12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
  13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the
  get involved page
  14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
 
  and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
  12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back
  to central instructions for running samples
  13 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
  14 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
 
  Regards, Kelvin
 
  On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras
   being added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent
   fixe, so we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of
   getting this release out.  Please help with some of these TODOs if you 
can.
   If you plan to tackle anything please post here so that we don't overlap;
   I'll do the same.
  
   these are the things that I think are must-fix
  
   1143 -- the issues re test failures are being resolved   -- david's
   working on this
   1429 -- i've looked at this and it is fine apart from the casting to
   HelperContextImpls -- i put a note on the jira,
   1428 -- note appended to jira asking for code to
   exercise/demonstrate the fix
  
   other issues raised on the list
  
   the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix
   this as per my note to tuscany-dev
   use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
   check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
   have equivalent fixes in 

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson

12 is done

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Oops,  I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done.  I'm back looking at
12 now.
Kelvin.

On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 11 seemed to be a no-op
 13 is done
 14 is done

 leaving ...

 2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
 3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
 have equivalent fixes in the branch
 6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
 10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
 12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
 15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to
 central instructions for running samples
 16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
 17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample


 On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I have now ported 4 or 5 fixes that had been made to the trunk but not
  to the branch (task 3).  While we are in this pre-release phase if you could
  create a patch of your local workspace when working in the trunk before
  committing and attach it to the JIRA,  then that eases the task of porting
  to the branch.  Better still would be to apply the patch to the branch too.
 
  Now I'm going to look at the samples javadoc issues,   phase 1 = tasks
  11, 12, 13, 14
 
  Regards, Kelvin.
 
  On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   just did 4,5,7,8,9,10(a) -- still not run the linux script
   so that leaves 2,3,6,11,12,13,14, and 15,16,17 (which were badly
   numbered as 12,13,14 -- doh!)
  
   2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
   3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made
   have equivalent fixes in the branch
   6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
   10b ensure that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
   11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
   12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
   13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the
   get involved page
   14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
   15 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back
   to central instructions for running samples
   16 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
   17 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
  
   I'm going to tackle 3 now
  
   Kelvin.
  
   On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its
easy to reference them
   
I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9
   
1 the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix
this as per my note to tuscany-dev
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat
results
3 check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was
made have equivalent fixes in the branch
   
the following have been raised by comments on RC1
   
4 NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure
no disclaimer contained)
5 need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed
jiras
6 need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
7 should remove EPL license from src distro
8 add stax reference in bin distro license
9 add readme to bin distro samples folder
10 fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure
that the runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
11 fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
12 exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
13 fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to
the get involved page
14 incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html
   
and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
12 ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point
back to central instructions for running samples
13 put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
14 add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
   
Regards, Kelvin
   
On 17/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra
 jiras being added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up 
after
 recent fixe, so we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be 
in terms
 of getting this release out.  Please help with some of these TODOs if 
you
 can.  If you plan to tackle anything please post here so that we don't
 overlap;  I'll do the same.

 these are the things that I think are must-fix

 1143 -- the issues re test failures are being resolved   --
 david's working on this
 1429 -- i've looked at this and it is fine apart from the
 casting to HelperContextImpls -- i put a 

Re: [SDO Java] things to be done for SDO release - please help

2007-07-17 Thread Fuhwei Lwo
Kelvin,

I hate to slow you down but we may need to change our scoping design and 
implementation so we have clean codegen fixes from 1143 and are not depending 
on EMF's EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE. The problem from current 1143 patch is 
that SDO runtime model are no longer registered with the 
EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE because we are trying not to use the 
EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE so 1143 patch took out the registration code in the 
FactoryBase.java. If we didn't go with the new design, we need to find a way to 
pre-register SDO runtime models with the EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE in addition 
to the builtInModelRegistry.

Let me try to describe the new design here and see whether it makes sense.

Current:
The default helper context is associated with the EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE so 
all the model packages get/put operations will be based on the registry from 
the TCCL.
The local helper context (from SDOUtil.createHelperContext()) is associated 
with the local package registry. If the model packages get/put operations 
failed, the delegation chain is builtInModelRegistry then 
EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE

* default HelperContext (EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE/TCCL based)
* local HelperContext (local package registry) --delegate-- 
builtInModelRegistry --delegate-- EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE

EMF and SDO runtime models resided in EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE

SDO type models (sdoModel.xsd, sdoJava.xsd, sdoXML.xsd, and sdoInternal.xsd) 
resided in both builtInModelRegistry and
EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE (registered in the FactoryBase.java)

User models will reside either in the EPackage.Registry or local package 
registry

New:
default HelperContext (SDOPackageRegistryImpl/TCCL based) --delegate-- 
builtInModelRegistry
local HelperContext (local package registry) --delegate-- builtInModelRegistry

EMF, SDO runtime, and SDO type models all reside in the builtInModelRegistry

User models will reside either in the SDOPackageRegistryImpl(TCCL based) or 
local package registry

This new scoping design needs to closely work with TUSCANY-1143 because the new 
codegen pattern needs to be used to generate the SDO runtime models to support 
this new design.

Let me know whether we should pursue this.  Thanks.

Fuhwei

kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This release is running later than I 
had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of getting this
release out.  Please help with some of these TODOs if you can.  If you plan
to tackle anything please post here so that we don't overlap;  I'll do the
same.

these are the things that I think are must-fix

1143 -- the issues re test failures are being resolved   -- david's working
on this
1429 -- i've looked at this and it is fine apart from the casting to
HelperContextImpls -- i put a note on the jira,
1428 -- note appended to jira asking for code to exercise/demonstrate the
fix

other issues raised on the list

the pom has a provided scope dependency on stax  -- I will fix this as per
my note to tuscany-dev
use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
check that all recent fixes in the trunk since the branch was made have
equivalent fixes in the branch

the following have been raised by comments on RC1

NOTICE files (create separate ones for impl and bin and ensure no disclaimer
contained)
need to update release notes with descriptive para and fixed jiras
need to remove dependencies on snapshot plugins (rfeng 13/7)
should remove EPL license from src distro
add stax reference in bin distro license
add readme to bin distro samples folder
fix up runsamples scripts to be more robust/helpful and ensure that the
runsamples.sh script runs ok in a linux env
fix up bad javadoc links in samples index.html
exclude samples infrastructure classes from samples javadoc
fix link back to tuscany site from overview.html to point to the get
involved page
incorporate Haleh's suggested paragraph [1] into overview.html

and some of my own todos that I hope to get to
ensure consistency of each sample program's javadoc to point back to central
instructions for running samples
put an overview doc into the sdo lib project's javadoc
add the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample




[1]
b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make sense.
How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users
learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available
to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be
extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features.
Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany
mailing list or join us and contribute to this project .