[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-07 Thread Chad Etzel

Hi Matt,

When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
please?  I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.

Thanks,
-Chad

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, TjL luo...@gmail.com wrote:

 *sigh*

 Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their filters
 and now they're going to break *again*.

 This is why daddy drinks.

 All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
 pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is doing —
 which is what it looks like (from an outsider's perspective) happened.

 IMO/FWIW: You've gotten too big to make these sorts of changes without
 more consideration and communication. It makes me look bad as a
 developer, and it makes Twitter look bad.

 The irony is that you're a company built around communication.

 TjL





 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:

 Hi all,

The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images' but in the
 process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting, and a great many
 people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that back now. Sorry for the
 disruption.

 Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
 Twitter Dev

 On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:


 FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's certainly
 a lot easier for image display, etc.

 But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
 hope this will be clarified.


 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:

 Hi there,

   We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce reporting and
 prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
 formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the 'always
 display images' option in many clients so we changed things around again.
 Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch of work as
 well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let people
 know.

 Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
Twitter Dev

 On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:


 The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

 Twitter nore...@twitter.com

 then it changed to

 Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

 then it changed to

 Twitter nore...@twitter.com

 again.


 Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
 change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
 people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
 assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it altogether.

 I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
 something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
 having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
 thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste of
 time.

 So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it enough
 to use it twice now :-)


 THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
 improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


 - TjL







[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-07 Thread Matt Sanford


Hi all,

I left last night while they were rolling this back to the old  
long format addresses. Re-reading the logs this morning it seems like  
there was some sort of problem and it was rolled back. Waiting for the  
engineer in question so I can find out more details but based on what  
I'm seeing it looks like an unrelated problem. I expect the long-style  
addresses to be re-deployed with our first deploy today.


As far as poor communication: that's fair. I made this change  
after talking with the mail processing folks (ok, the guy) and product  
folks and I broke your filters. I'm sorry about that and when you  
brought it up I fixed the issue, wrote the tests, replied to the mails  
and begged the deploy engineer to make it an emergency. I tried to  
communicate things.


I should have told the list (and probably posted to  
blog.twitter.com) this user-facing email change was coming … surprise  
is overrated. I definitely should have thought more about how it would  
effect filtering. Totally my bad … you can send flaming sacks of dog  
poop to REDACTED.


Thanks;
 – Matt Can do no right Sanford

On May 7, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Chad Etzel wrote:



Hi Matt,

When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
please?  I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.

Thanks,
-Chad

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, TjL luo...@gmail.com wrote:


*sigh*

Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their  
filters

and now they're going to break *again*.

This is why daddy drinks.

All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is  
doing —
which is what it looks like (from an outsider's perspective)  
happened.


IMO/FWIW: You've gotten too big to make these sorts of changes  
without

more consideration and communication. It makes me look bad as a
developer, and it makes Twitter look bad.

The irony is that you're a company built around communication.

TjL





On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com  
wrote:


Hi all,

  The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images'  
but in the
process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting, and a  
great many
people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that back now.  
Sorry for the

disruption.

Thanks;
– Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
   Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:



FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's  
certainly

a lot easier for image display, etc.

But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change  
back. I

hope this will be clarified.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com  
wrote:


Hi there,

 We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
reporting and

prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
'always
display images' option in many clients so we changed things  
around again.
Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch  
of work as
well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
people

know.

Thanks;
– Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
  Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:



The email notifications for new followers used to come from  
(From:)


Twitter nore...@twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com 



then it changed to

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

again.


Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport  
has to
change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining  
to

people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
altogether.


I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to),  
it's

something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
having something as basic as this change twice and break the  
entire
thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant  
waste of

time.

So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
enough

to use it twice now :-)


THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


- TjL












[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-07 Thread Ed Finkler

You do a ton of great things, Matt. We all make mistakes, but you and
the rest of the crew there do a bang-up job.

--
Ed Finkler
http://funkatron.com
Twitter:@funkatron
AIM: funka7ron
ICQ: 3922133
XMPP:funkat...@gmail.com


On May 7, 11:24 am, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:
 Hi all,

      I left last night while they were rolling this back to the old  
 long format addresses. Re-reading the logs this morning it seems like  
 there was some sort of problem and it was rolled back. Waiting for the  
 engineer in question so I can find out more details but based on what  
 I'm seeing it looks like an unrelated problem. I expect the long-style  
 addresses to be re-deployed with our first deploy today.

      As far as poor communication: that's fair. I made this change  
 after talking with the mail processing folks (ok, the guy) and product  
 folks and I broke your filters. I'm sorry about that and when you  
 brought it up I fixed the issue, wrote the tests, replied to the mails  
 and begged the deploy engineer to make it an emergency. I tried to  
 communicate things.

      I should have told the list (and probably posted to  
 blog.twitter.com) this user-facing email change was coming … surprise  
 is overrated. I definitely should have thought more about how it would  
 effect filtering. Totally my bad … you can send flaming sacks of dog  
 poop to REDACTED.

 Thanks;
   – Matt Can do no right Sanford

 On May 7, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Chad Etzel wrote:



  Hi Matt,

  When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
  please?  I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.

  Thanks,
  -Chad

  On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, TjL luo...@gmail.com wrote:

  *sigh*

  Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their  
  filters
  and now they're going to break *again*.

  This is why daddy drinks.

  All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
  pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is  
  doing —
  which is what it looks like (from an outsider's perspective)  
  happened.

  IMO/FWIW: You've gotten too big to make these sorts of changes  
  without
  more consideration and communication. It makes me look bad as a
  developer, and it makes Twitter look bad.

  The irony is that you're a company built around communication.

  TjL

  On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com  
  wrote:

  Hi all,

    The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images'  
  but in the
  process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting, and a  
  great many
  people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that back now.  
  Sorry for the
  disruption.

  Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
     Twitter Dev

  On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:

  FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's  
  certainly
  a lot easier for image display, etc.

  But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change  
  back. I
  hope this will be clarified.

  On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com  
  wrote:

  Hi there,

   We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
  reporting and
  prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
  formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
  'always
  display images' option in many clients so we changed things  
  around again.
  Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch  
  of work as
  well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
  people
  know.

  Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
    Twitter Dev

  On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:

  The email notifications for new followers used to come from  
  (From:)

  Twitter nore...@twitter.com

  then it changed to

  Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

  then it changed to

  Twitter nore...@twitter.com

  again.

  Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport  
  has to
  change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining  
  to
  people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
  assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
  altogether.

  I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to),  
  it's
  something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
  having something as basic as this change twice and break the  
  entire
  thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant  
  waste of
  time.

  So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
  enough
  to use it twice now :-)

  THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
  improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.

  - TjL




[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-07 Thread Nick Arnett
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi Matt,

 When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
 please?  I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.


I've dealt with this by leaving my old filters in place.  If Twitter
switches back to something older, I'm covered.

Nick


[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-06 Thread John Adams


This is a bug introduced in the last deploy. We've all agreed on the  
VERP format,


twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

I'll follow up with engineering and file a bug. Sorry about this.

-john

On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:



The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

again.


Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it altogether.

I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste of
time.

So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it enough
to use it twice now :-)


THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


- TjL


---
John Adams
Twitter Operations
j...@twitter.com
http://twitter.com/netik






[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-06 Thread Matt Sanford


Don't touch that dial …

We're (John and I) discussing bounce processing and spam  
detection and may have to revert the from address change to help with  
people's spam filters. I'll update once I know more.


Thanks;
 – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
 Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:



FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's certainly
a lot easier for image display, etc.

But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
hope this will be clarified.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:


Hi there,

   We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
reporting and

prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
'always
display images' option in many clients so we changed things around  
again.
Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch of  
work as
well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
people know.


Thanks;
 – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:



The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

again.


Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
altogether.


I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste of
time.

So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
enough

to use it twice now :-)


THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


- TjL







[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-06 Thread John Adams


nore...@twitter.com isn't the best choice because many mailers on the  
Internet refuse to acknowledge Errors-To: headers.


Right now, because there is little industry consensus on how to  
properly handle a bounce (aside from send a message back to the Return- 
Path:) our VERP methodology on address is the best way that we can  
ensure our bounce processing mechanism is fired.


If we don't process bounces, major ISPs will start to block us for  
excessive bad addresses, and then no one gets mail.


Matt and I are working to push out proper addressing changes today,  
and we'll have this sorted shortly.


-john

On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:



FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's certainly
a lot easier for image display, etc.

But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
hope this will be clarified.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:


Hi there,

   We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
reporting and

prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
'always
display images' option in many clients so we changed things around  
again.
Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch of  
work as
well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
people know.


Thanks;
 – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:



The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

again.


Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
altogether.


I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste of
time.

So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
enough

to use it twice now :-)


THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


- TjL





---
John Adams
Twitter Operations
j...@twitter.com
http://twitter.com/netik






[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-06 Thread Matt Sanford


It seems John and I cannot help but write mails at the same time :)

— Matt

On May 6, 2009, at 3:54 PM, John Adams wrote:



nore...@twitter.com isn't the best choice because many mailers on  
the Internet refuse to acknowledge Errors-To: headers.


Right now, because there is little industry consensus on how to  
properly handle a bounce (aside from send a message back to the  
Return-Path:) our VERP methodology on address is the best way that  
we can ensure our bounce processing mechanism is fired.


If we don't process bounces, major ISPs will start to block us for  
excessive bad addresses, and then no one gets mail.


Matt and I are working to push out proper addressing changes today,  
and we'll have this sorted shortly.


-john

On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:



FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's  
certainly

a lot easier for image display, etc.

But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
hope this will be clarified.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com  
wrote:


Hi there,

  We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
reporting and

prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
'always
display images' option in many clients so we changed things around  
again.
Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch of  
work as
well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
people know.


Thanks;
– Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
   Twitter Dev

On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:



The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

then it changed to

Twitter twitter-follow- 
emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com


then it changed to

Twitter nore...@twitter.com

again.


Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
altogether.


I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste  
of

time.

So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
enough

to use it twice now :-)


THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


- TjL





---
John Adams
Twitter Operations
j...@twitter.com
http://twitter.com/netik








[twitter-dev] Re: Can Twitter please pick a From: and stick with it?

2009-05-06 Thread TjL

*sigh*

Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their filters
and now they're going to break *again*.

This is why daddy drinks.

All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is doing —
which is what it looks like (from an outsider's perspective) happened.

IMO/FWIW: You've gotten too big to make these sorts of changes without
more consideration and communication. It makes me look bad as a
developer, and it makes Twitter look bad.

The irony is that you're a company built around communication.

TjL





On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:

 Hi all,

    The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images' but in the
 process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting, and a great many
 people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that back now. Sorry for the
 disruption.

 Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
     Twitter Dev

 On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:


 FWIW I think nore...@twitter.com is the right choice, it's certainly
 a lot easier for image display, etc.

 But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change back. I
 hope this will be clarified.


 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford m...@twitter.com wrote:

 Hi there,

   We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce reporting and
 prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
 formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the 'always
 display images' option in many clients so we changed things around again.
 Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch of work as
 well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let people
 know.

 Thanks;
  – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
    Twitter Dev

 On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:


 The email notifications for new followers used to come from (From:)

 Twitter nore...@twitter.com

 then it changed to

 Twitter twitter-follow-emailname=domain@postmaster.twitter.com

 then it changed to

 Twitter nore...@twitter.com

 again.


 Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport has to
 change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining to
 people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
 assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it altogether.

 I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to), it's
 something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
 having something as basic as this change twice and break the entire
 thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant waste of
 time.

 So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it enough
 to use it twice now :-)


 THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
 improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.


 - TjL