RE: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME?
With UV at least, CNAME is a Unix executable, hence able to handle the renaming of very large sequential files and the like... Unlike a UV BASIC program, the UV line editor or the UV COPY verb (the latter two being UV BASIC programs). So it, can come in very handy! Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Snyder Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME? Wendy Smoak wrote on 07/22/2004 07:26:59 PM: From a UniBasic program, why would you open a file, read a record, write it back to the same file under a different key, then delete the original record, when you could just: X.CMD = CNAME filename :X.ID:',':X.NEW.ID EXECUTE X.CMD The overhead of the execute would be greater than if you did it programmatically. CNAME will be doing everything you'd be doing, but there will also be the overhead of the execute. If you're doing it once within a program, the difference will be negligible. But don't think about doing it in a loop. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem
If you are moving programs between type 19 files, why even bother using a phantom ? If on Unix, why not have a cp CRON job, and if you are on Windows use AT . OR, why not have the C routine process File1 directly ? Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of djordan Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem I would say that the file B is still being read by the C program or has not been released. Check if the file is locked before you try to write using a READL or READU. If you don't use the locked clause it will wait until the C program releases File B. Also consider looking at new features of UniVerse such as Sockets or MQ (Message Que) to do the same process. These have a lot of sophisticated features to handle this environment. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of prem jaisinghani Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 5:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem Hi, I am facing following problem regarding Phantoms in universe: We have a phantom which keeps on polling a type 19 file, say File1 for data and transfers it to another type 19 file, say File B. File B in turn is being read by a 'c' program. The first phantom gets killed sometimes and pretty randomly. The error code thrown is 40019, but I could not get any the information about this error. Please find below a sample error message: FATAL - Unable to write 7545698440*13346*25966.940943 on FileB If someone has experienced such problem and/or has a workaround, please let me know. Thanks and Regards, Prem --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.725 / Virus Database: 480 - Release Date: 19/07/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.725 / Virus Database: 480 - Release Date: 19/07/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
SV: [U2] startud
Thanks you very much for the details Ken! Bjvrn Eklund -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fren: Ken Wallis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 23 juli 2004 04:12 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dmne: RE: [U2] startud Bjvrn Eklund wrote: I've decided to make an new start script for Unidata that includes startud and the start command of my program. Bjvrn, That would be what I'd do, sort of. Usually I set up a script in /etc/init.d to start and stop unidata cleanly, and then I link to it from the appropriate /etc/rc?.d directories, and for good measure put a script in /usr/local/bin which I whack higher in the PATH than $UDTBIN which intercepts any startud or stopud commands and pushes them through my /etc/init.d/unidata script. By doing this, I make a decent fist of driving any normal mechanism for starting or stopping unidata through a single spot so I can do other useful stuff at the same time - like write a message to syslog, or more importantly, make sure that the current RFS archive log file has been copied to the DR server. If someone knows what they are doing they can always get direct access to stopud or startud via $UDTBIN/st...ud, but it isn't often that you'd want to do that. The decision then is whether to put the startup for you phantoms into the same script as the one that starts unidata, or whether to put it in a separate /etc/init.d script and maybe link to it from a higher run level /etc/rc?.d. UniData commands not providing any reliable exit status is very annoying, but it has always been that way I'm afraid. What I usually do is add an extra capability to my /etc/init.d/unidata so that it understand not just the start and stop commands, but also a 'status' command which will use showud and look for a complete daemon set running to determine if it really believes that UniData is running. I then make it exit with a known status so in other scripts I can do: if /etc/init.d/unidata status then # stuff that relies on UniData being up else echo better start UniData first! exit 2 fi I'd wrap something this around your phantom initiation commands, and think hard about whether you need some way to shut your phantoms down neatly or is it OK simply to have stopud -f kill them? Cheers, Ken -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fren: Bjvrn Eklund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] anyone who start unibasic programs automatically when you start unidata? I would like my a phantom process started each time I run startud. All tips are welcome. Could cron be a way to go? We are on ud5.2 and solaris 8. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME?
Probably doesn't apply in this case but there's a trap to beware of If the file is type 1/19 and the record contains binary data, a simple read/write will corrupt it. On reads from a type 1/19, newlines are replaced by field marks. On write the opposite translation happens. For a normal text type database record this is fine, however, if you store bitmapped data (e.g. scanned images) in a type 1/19 file they will be damaged by this process. This was a long standing problem in COPY in UV but was fixed some time ago. The fix uses an (undocumented?) mode flag: ASSIGN 1 TO SYSTEM(1017)to turn off character translation and ASSIGN 0 TO SYSTEM(1017)to turn it on again Until this morning, I thought that CNAME had also been fixed but it seems that I am wrong (though the system I tried it on is still using 9.6.1.2). To demonstrate this problem, compile a one line program that prints -2. Use CNAME to change the name of the object record and the program prints -62963. I can't imagine that many users rename their object files but it shows the effect. I know of one very big UV site where they decided to save time by copying the object code from a test system to the live system using COPY rather than recompiling. This neatly destroyed every program along the way. A favourite variant on this problem was for users who went home from system adminstration courses and decided that GLOBAL.CATDIR might be better as a type 19 file instead of type 1. Yes, RESIZE used to have the same bug. The only way to get going again was to rebuild the catalog. Thankfully, this one has been fixed. Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB +44-(0)1604-709200 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME?
This is from Universe 10.2 RUN BP A -2 CNAME BP.O A,V Changed record A to V in file BP.O. RUN BP V -246 Same problem except I get -246 not -6293 !! Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Phillips Sent: 23 July 2004 09:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME? Probably doesn't apply in this case but there's a trap to beware of If the file is type 1/19 and the record contains binary data, a simple read/write will corrupt it. On reads from a type 1/19, newlines are replaced by field marks. On write the opposite translation happens. For a normal text type database record this is fine, however, if you store bitmapped data (e.g. scanned images) in a type 1/19 file they will be damaged by this process. This was a long standing problem in COPY in UV but was fixed some time ago. The fix uses an (undocumented?) mode flag: ASSIGN 1 TO SYSTEM(1017)to turn off character translation and ASSIGN 0 TO SYSTEM(1017)to turn it on again Until this morning, I thought that CNAME had also been fixed but it seems that I am wrong (though the system I tried it on is still using 9.6.1.2). To demonstrate this problem, compile a one line program that prints -2. Use CNAME to change the name of the object record and the program prints -62963. I can't imagine that many users rename their object files but it shows the effect. I know of one very big UV site where they decided to save time by copying the object code from a test system to the live system using COPY rather than recompiling. This neatly destroyed every program along the way. A favourite variant on this problem was for users who went home from system adminstration courses and decided that GLOBAL.CATDIR might be better as a type 19 file instead of type 1. Yes, RESIZE used to have the same bug. The only way to get going again was to rebuild the catalog. Thankfully, this one has been fixed. Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB +44-(0)1604-709200 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem
Look up error codes in the SYS.MESSAGE file. This has six digit keys. LIST SYS.MESSAGE '040019' or SELECT * FROM SYS.MESSAGE WHERE @ID = '040119'; If it's not there, the next best choice is, for connectivity questions, the InterCall manual. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] looking for software - dry cleaner
you can probably snoop around the internet for information on the following two listings I have Rich NA.MAINTName/Add Maintenance 08:27:08 2 Name/Add Number:5486 Fazio Cleaners Los Angeles CA 01)Name/Add Name:Fazio Cleaners 02)Sort Key.: 03)Address one..: 04)Address two..: 05)City.:Los Angeles 06)State:CA 07)Country: 08)Zipcode..: 09)Telephone: 10)Fax: 11)Contact..: 12)Hourly Rate..:.00 13)Contract Date: 14)Category.:P-U Pick UserAdd Date 05-03-2004 15)Tax Rate.:.00 Mod Date 05-03-2004 16)Systems..:D3/Linux 17)Sftwre Pkgs..:The Cleaner System, drycleaning app 18)Follow Date..: 19)Mgmnt Fee: 20)Source...:comp.databases.pick, discussion on pick users Mods,Delete,EXit,File,Remarks,Screen 2,3,4: === NA.MAINTName/Add Maintenance 08:29:43 2 Name/Add Number:4520 Applications Liberate Hardware somewhere aroun 01)Name/Add Name:Applications Liberate Hardware 02)Sort Key.: 03)Address one..: 04)Address two..: 05)City.:somewhere around irvine 06)State:CA 07)Country: 08)Zipcode..: 09)Telephone:714-557-8799 10)Fax: 11)Contact..:Steven Davies-Morris 12)Hourly Rate..:.00 13)Contract Date: 14)Category.:P-C Pick Consultant/DeveloperAdd Date 05-14-1998 15)Tax Rate.:.00 Mod Date 05-14-1998 16)Systems..:Ap/Pro 17)Sftwre Pkgs..:dry cleaning store software 18)Follow Date..: 19)Mgmnt Fee: 20)Source...:comp.database.pick email Mods,Delete,EXit,File,Remarks,Screen 2,3,4: Peter Gonzalez wrote: Does anybody know of a MV package for dry cleaners? Peter Gonzalez Senior Programmer Analyst M M Aerospace Hardware, Inc., a B/E Aerospace Company 1 NW 15 Terrace Miami, Florida 33172 Phone: 305.925.2714 Fax: 305.925.2610 www.mmaero.com --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Richard A. Wilson Lakeside Systems Smithfield, RI, USA Voice 401-231-3959 Fax 401-231-3943 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.lakeside-systems.com --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME?
In the old Prime Information days (where I believe CNAME came from) the runtime engine would actually block an attempt to do a CNAME from anywhere other than the colon (TCL) prompt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 July 2004 13:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME? Wendy Smoak wrote on: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:26:59 -0700 It seems that CNAME is not a popular UniBasic command. Is there some history here I'm not aware of, maybe it was unreliable? From a UniBasic program, why would you open a file, read a record, write it back to the same file under a different key, then delete the original record, when you could just: X.CMD = CNAME filename :X.ID:',':X.NEW.ID EXECUTE X.CMD Two reasons for me: 1) I learned MV under Pick, where CNAME wasn't available. As previously stated, you had to use the COPY command (with the (D option) and DATA the destination. I've only been using UniData for about 3 years under SB+, so I'm still learning some of the non-Pick syntax options. 2) Crash safety net :- If the system were to crash during the CNAME operation, I wouldn't know for certain where the record was, and it could be completely lost. If it crashed during the WRITE/DELETE sequence, I would either have just the original, just the new, or possibly both. --Tom Pellitieri Century Equipment --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem
As David said, you get this if the C program has the file open. Another work around is to use the ON ERROR clause for the write: WrittenOk = @True Loop Write TheItem On FL, TheId ON ERROR WrittenOk = @False Until WrittenOk Do Nap 10 Repeat Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of prem jaisinghani Sent: 22 July 2004 20:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem Hi, I am facing following problem regarding Phantoms in universe: We have a phantom which keeps on polling a type 19 file, say File1 for data and transfers it to another type 19 file, say File B. File B in turn is being read by a 'c' program. The first phantom gets killed sometimes and pretty randomly. The error code thrown is 40019, but I could not get any the information about this error. Please find below a sample error message: FATAL - Unable to write 7545698440*13346*25966.940943 on FileB If someone has experienced such problem and/or has a workaround, please let me know. Thanks and Regards, Prem --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen. This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan. DISCLAIMER This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microgen Information Management Solutions http://www.microgen.co.uk --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Report Writer to Create MVquery Statements
Mark, If you wish to take a look at mvQuery, there is a free evaluation available. Just drop an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is windows based, but then so is CR - mvQuery however sticks to the mv modes and does not require ODBC or other layers. Regards, Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: 22 July 2004 14:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Report Writer to Create MVquery Statements One of my new clients (new to MV as well) would like a program to help them create their own ad-hoc mvquery reports. Presently, I'm creating a simple 2-section program where the first section indicates the verb, filename, heading/footing and some of the popular modifiers. The second section is free-form text for the actual 'work' of the statement. Due to the complexity of these reports, I cannot imagine an easier approach within MV. I've used MS Access on Access and Crystal Reports against a SQL database and wonder if there's something already written for MV. I want to stay within MV. I don't want to venture into CR or any other ODBC item. Does anyone have any ideas on a simple MV report writer. Please don't deviate from staying within MV. Thanks in advance Mark Johnson --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen. This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan. DISCLAIMER This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microgen Information Management Solutions http://www.microgen.co.uk --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Longstanding aversion to CNAME?
UV10 STILL DOES NOT UPDATE INDEXES if the index is part of the ID. From: Norman, David (SAAS) In UV9.4 CNAME didn't update secondary indexes, which left a bit of a mess behind. This has now been fixed, probably from 9.6. Example. A 2-part id: [internal-date]*[something] indexed on date ( @ID['*',1,1] or FIELD(@ID,'*',1) ) Changing a 0 to a 1 in a date in a particular id: CNAME file 13350*ABC,13351*ABC will leave old, nonexistant id 13350*ABC indexed under date 13350 and will not add the new id to 13351. IBM knows this (probably forwarded from the Vmark days), but resolutely will not fix it because the underlying i/o routines used by CNAME are different from the norm and won't easily support the change. This list's archives will support that claim. One could reasonably restate that as, It's too hard to fix, so just live with the inherent data integrity vulnerability. Or even, Help, help we're being oppressed. Come see the vulnerability inherent in the system. Chuck Stevenson P.S. As for speed, for type-1 -19 CNAME is faster than other read/write/delete schemes one could program. I *believe* it invokes a unix mv command which simply repoints the inode without actually moving any files. Similar on MS. P.P.S. I recall CNAME was originally a PRIMOS command similar to unix mv. Information just borrowed the name and handled type-1 ( UFDs (UserFileDirectories) ) with the primos mechanism, and used its own mechanism for hashed records. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg
For your information, I had to know of repeated cases where Windows 2003 cannot reboot when the SharedSection third parameter of the Windows registry entry in question = 8192. An US U2 Technical Support Analyst told me : The quoted Technical Bulletin is titled Maximizing performances for UniVerse systems - updated for UniVerse 9.5.1F... So, theorically, the document wouldn't apply after this (old) UniVerse release... ;-) In fact, we know that it can apply until release 9.6.x and on Windows versions earlier than Windows 2003. But, definitively : - Windows 2003 manages Desktop heap differently than previous Windows versions (This may have become dynamic... and... this point is not documented by Microsoft) - UniVerse Telnet Service at version 10.0.x have the option to Interact with Desktop, which makes useless for the need of the database this Windows tuning. - UniVerse Telnet Service + UniRPC Service at release 10.1 are both able to Interact with Desktop, and the need for this Windows tuning totally disappears. I answered individually to the initial message. Regards, Hervi BALESTRIERI Support Technique Avanci - IBM Data Management - Produits U2 Web : http://www.ibm.com/software/u2/ - Forwarded by Herve Balestrieri/France/IBM on 23/07/2004 15:34 - Adrian Matthews Adrian.Matthews@ igindex.co.uk To Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc stserver.u2ug.org Subject RE: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing 23/07/2004 12:41 new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg Please respond to u2-users Try this registry change using RegEdit. You won't be able to run more than 60 sessions without this change on Windows. \HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control \SessionManager\SubSystems\Windows If the value is 1024,3072,512, change 512 to 3072. It is in one of the UV manuals somewhere... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Walter Sent: 22 July 2004 18:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg This is about UV 10.1.x on Win2003 server. I'm completely baffled by this recurring situation. It goes like this - universe is up and running, lots of users connected, life is wonderful. Sporadically - about two or three times in each 24 hour period - the system gets into a state where it will not accept any new Universe logins. Users already logged are often unaffected, but any attempt to start a new session with Dynamic Connect gets the message [Connection Aborted] right away - before telnet prompts for username/password are presented. When the system is in this state, any attempt to use UniAdmin results in an error message something like 'RPC error 1' - I'm not sure if that is the exact error message, but that's the gist of it. Tried stop/start all universe services and every time the Universe Resource and Universe Telnet services FAIL to restart, but the RPC service restarts correctly. Only way out is to reboot the server - which is a big hassle of course and make for very unhappy users and sysadmins ;-( Any ideas comments on this will be highly appreciated. Thanks much, joe People Technology delivering results http://www.ClientsFirst-US.com Joe Walter Phone-Direct : 330.867.3851 Senior Product Engineer - Central RegionPhone-Direct : 330.990.9081 Phone-Main : 866.732.9191 26380 Curtiss Wright Parkway, Suite 108 Fax/Voice Mail : 435.514.5132 Cleveland, OH 44143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any
RE: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg
Interesting seeing that people are still being told to use this setting by Vars (and IBM) post 9.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herve Balestrieri Sent: 23 July 2004 15:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg For your information, I had to know of repeated cases where Windows 2003 cannot reboot when the SharedSection third parameter of the Windows registry entry in question = 8192. An US U2 Technical Support Analyst told me : The quoted Technical Bulletin is titled Maximizing performances for UniVerse systems - updated for UniVerse 9.5.1F... So, theorically, the document wouldn't apply after this (old) UniVerse release... ;-) In fact, we know that it can apply until release 9.6.x and on Windows versions earlier than Windows 2003. But, definitively : - Windows 2003 manages Desktop heap differently than previous Windows versions (This may have become dynamic... and... this point is not documented by Microsoft) - UniVerse Telnet Service at version 10.0.x have the option to Interact with Desktop, which makes useless for the need of the database this Windows tuning. - UniVerse Telnet Service + UniRPC Service at release 10.1 are both able to Interact with Desktop, and the need for this Windows tuning totally disappears. I answered individually to the initial message. Regards, Hervi BALESTRIERI Support Technique Avanci - IBM Data Management - Produits U2 Web : http://www.ibm.com/software/u2/ - Forwarded by Herve Balestrieri/France/IBM on 23/07/2004 15:34 - Adrian Matthews Adrian.Matthews@ igindex.co.uk To Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc stserver.u2ug.org Subject RE: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing 23/07/2004 12:41 new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg Please respond to u2-users Try this registry change using RegEdit. You won't be able to run more than 60 sessions without this change on Windows. \HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control \SessionManager\SubSystems\Windows If the value is 1024,3072,512, change 512 to 3072. It is in one of the UV manuals somewhere... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Walter Sent: 22 July 2004 18:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg This is about UV 10.1.x on Win2003 server. I'm completely baffled by this recurring situation. It goes like this - universe is up and running, lots of users connected, life is wonderful. Sporadically - about two or three times in each 24 hour period - the system gets into a state where it will not accept any new Universe logins. Users already logged are often unaffected, but any attempt to start a new session with Dynamic Connect gets the message [Connection Aborted] right away - before telnet prompts for username/password are presented. When the system is in this state, any attempt to use UniAdmin results in an error message something like 'RPC error 1' - I'm not sure if that is the exact error message, but that's the gist of it. Tried stop/start all universe services and every time the Universe Resource and Universe Telnet services FAIL to restart, but the RPC service restarts correctly. Only way out is to reboot the server - which is a big hassle of course and make for very unhappy users and sysadmins ;-( Any ideas comments on this will be highly appreciated. Thanks much, joe People Technology delivering results http://www.ClientsFirst-US.com Joe Walter Phone-Direct : 330.867.3851 Senior Product Engineer - Central RegionPhone-Direct : 330.990.9081 Phone-Main : 866.732.9191 26380 Curtiss Wright Parkway, Suite 108 Fax/Voice Mail : 435.514.5132 Cleveland, OH 44143 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
[U2] James Ronan/IIG/Prudential is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 07/23/2004 and will not return until 07/27/2004. Please contact Tricia Shelly x 6531 in my absence. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam?
I have experienced a HUGE increase in SPAM lately and I was wondering if somehow the users list has been utilized to facilitate that. I am not thinking that the origin is knowingliy from the administrators of this fine list -- but if this list was somehow lifted or otherwise absconded... --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam?
Debster wrote: I have experienced a HUGE increase in SPAM lately and I was wondering if somehow the users list has been utilized to facilitate that. One possible source: the list is now archived at gmane which barely munges the email addresses, only replacing '@' with ' at '. http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.u2.general/ I prefer mail-archive.com which doesn't even show them, it replaces anything resembling an email address with '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. http://www.mail-archive.com/u2-users%40listserver.u2ug.org/ (and some older stuff: http://www.mail-archive.com/u2-users%40oliver.com/) The IndexInfocus archives are not indexed by search engines, when that's all there was, we were fairly anonymous. I have mail filters on everything coming in, so I don't really notice an increase if it happens. A few message slip through, just a minor annoyance. -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [OT] Has anyone experienced a HUGE increase of Spam?
A new technique called Phishing (pronounced Fishing) is being employed by Spammers. They just do the brute force method of emailing (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]@yahoo.com, etc) and if they don't get a bounce back, then they know that they got a valid email address, and then it goes out to the Spam lists. This has happened to all of my email addresses in the last couple of months. Fun, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Debster Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 09:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam? I have experienced a HUGE increase in SPAM lately and I was wondering if somehow the users list has been utilized to facilitate that. I am not thinking that the origin is knowingliy from the administrators of this fine list -- but if this list was somehow lifted or otherwise absconded... --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam?
Apparantly there are a few new varients of blaster and bagel out there, our local news station ran a story on it. I'm guessing a bunch more non-patched, non-updated XP's got owned and are sprewing spam. George -Original Message- From: Larry Hiscock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam? It's unlikely that the list is being used directly for spam for two reasons: 1) The lists are closed lists, which means that one must be subscribed to the list in order to post to it. 2) The majordomo commands to retrieve the list of subscribers have been disabled, so one cannot harvest the addresses on the list. The only persons with access to the full subscriber list are the moderators. Regards, Larry Hiscock Moderator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debster Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [OT] Has anyone exoerienced a HUGE increase of Spam? I have experienced a HUGE increase in SPAM lately and I was wondering if somehow the users list has been utilized to facilitate that. I am not thinking that the origin is knowingliy from the administrators of this fine list -- but if this list was somehow lifted or otherwise absconded... --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] wIntegrate Query Builder
Is there a way to limit dictionary items from appearing in query builder. We are wondering if we can let the end users run with query builder but not give them access to all the dictionary items. kevin --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] wIntegrate Query Builder
Create a user version of the file with just the items you want them to see. VOC: FilenameForUsers 1: F 2: Original File name 3: D_CopyofDictforUsers Could use CREATE.FILE DICT CopyofDictforUsers Mike R. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Michaelsen Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] wIntegrate Query Builder Is there a way to limit dictionary items from appearing in query builder. We are wondering if we can let the end users run with query builder but not give them access to all the dictionary items. kevin --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Dale Bertke is out of the office
I will be out of the office starting 07/23/2004 and will not return until 07/27/2004. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg
Thanks Jordan. I wish licensing was the cause, but unfortunately it's something far more insidious than that. For awhile I was starting to think it had something to do with this gigabit NIC card on the new server. The LAN is only wired for 10/100MBPS. When we set the rate on the network card down to 100MBPS it seemed the condition did not occurr as frequently. Now I'm not certain if that's true or not. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UV on Win2003, refusing new logins, UniAdmin issues RPC errmsg Have you checked the user license count using the Uv license tool. Users may not be exiting gracefully and are leaving the license locked on the server. To clean this use UvLicTool with the clean option to release these licenses. You will find it in the /uv/uv/bin directory. It has options to report licenses or fix license count. This can occur if a program has a fatal that logsout the system. Other issues can be where users exit the Dynamic Connect client without first logging out. Regards David Jordan snip --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] merge sort
Chuck, if what you wanted was to look at the code to see how it's done this won't help but. AD for MERGE.LIST I've used MERGE.LIST which is very effective. I've written programs which sort and merge many subsets just by executing this utilities and then doing the good ol' READLIST. SELECT PARTS BY REV.NO SAVING REV.NO TO 1 SELECT VENDOR.PARTS BY VEN.REV SAVING VEN.REV TO 2 MERGE.LIST 1 UNION 2 Or MERGE.LIST 1 DIFFERENCE 2 You can go on forever . (or at least I've gone up to 9 lists.) SSELECT is best if you can use file ID's. Even if you don't have a file structure already built, you can create a temp file, write your data elements to be sorted out as ID's then use SSELECT. Amazing what some programmers will do to avoid writing code :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Mongiovi Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] merge sort Does anyone know where I can get code for a generic BASIC Merge SORT routine? -Chuck --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] merge sort
EXECUTE MERGE.LIST 0 UNION 0 TO 0 will sort and de-dupe the current select list. -Original Message- From: Chuck Mongiovi Does anyone know where I can get code for a generic BASIC Merge SORT routine? -Chuck --- The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original message from your system. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UD] Returning data to ksh
Thanks guys. I ended up using a file based on the calling shell's PID. It works but thought there might be a more elegant solution. - Original Message - From: Ken Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:10 PM Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Returning data to ksh Doyen Klein wrote: You could at the start of the shell write an 'in-process flag' (simply create file with a specific name). As the final step in the process, when completed successfully, delete that file. Then . If [exists(file)] - you know the process failed. You could also look at it the other way round - rm -f a status file before you kick off the udt process, then afterwards, if the file exists and contains a good status code then all is well, otherwise it isn't. Something a bit like this: #!/usr/bin/ksh # could try something clever to give you a unique temp file name here if you like export STATFILE=/x/y/z rm -f $STATFILE udt !eof YOURCOMMANDSHERE WRITESTATUS quit !eof if [ -f $STATFILE ] then head -n 1 $STATFILE | read STAT ERRMSG else STAT=99 ERRMSG=cannot find status file $STATFILE fi if [ $STAT = 0 ] then # cool else # not cool echo $ERRMSG 2 exit $STAT fi And WRITESTATUS would be a cataloged program that might look like this: PROGRAM WRITESTATUS * maybe use the @USER... variables or your own specific named common to keep track of things COMMON /STATCOM/ ERRSTAT, ERRMSG OSWRITE ERRSTAT: :ERRMSG TO GETENV(STATFILE) ON ERROR ABORT STOP END HTH, Ken Ralph Melia wrote: I'm working on a project that involves integrating our (UD 5.2 on AIX) programs into a job stream via ksh scripts. And I need a way of communicating back to the calling shell whether the unidata process (program) completed successfully or not. The relevant part of the shell would look something like: $UDTBIN/udt program parameters if [ it failed ]; then do something I'm thinking that there must be a simple solution, but I'm drawing a blank. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Mvquery Row
Does anyone know how to prevent the column called ROW from getting created when the results are produced ? - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re[2]: [U2] UniDK
Well that did not work. Thanks for all your help but my VP is going to overrule me
('us'). Oh wellWhat can you do?!? :-) Thanks again
Bill Pizer
Assistant Director of MIS and Benefactor System Administrator
The Sage Colleges
45 Ferry Street
Troy, NY 12180
518-244-2087
518-244-2085 (fax)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Original Email
From: Ray Wurlod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 17, 2004 06:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniDK
I wholeheartedly support the previous two posters' comments.
Best is to have your new person use PE on a machine not connected to the network, the
only totally safe strategy.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
