Re: [U2] [uv] Windows printer setup
Thanks everyone for your help!! -Dianne Mike Pflugfelder wrote: Dianne, In your SETPTR statement, if you specify the printer name as a UNC printer (\\server\printer) then yes, you can print to a remote printer on a separate server or workstation. The user that is sending the print job needs to have permissions to print to the printer, but that's normally the case. -Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:55 AM To: U2 List Server Subject: [U2] [uv] Windows printer setup Hello wise ones! It has always been my assumption that Universe on Windows can only deal with printers which are mounted locally. Is there a way to spool to printers on a separate printer server, other than mounting each one locally on the uv server? Thanks in advance for your help! -Dianne --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] Triggers
Agreed - I never use the same code for both. The poster just asked if it was possible and it is. Just tweaking the idea, Jeff.. That's all. -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] Determine path logged on users are in
Add a process to the LOGIN paragraph that writes information about that udt process, such as it's path, to a file. That file can be queried to determine all paths. Don't forget to add something to the LOGOUT paragraph to remove that information so that the file is always current. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:26 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UD] Determine path logged on users are in How does one go about determining the account (path) other users are logged into? If I do an LISTUSER I get: 2 Dtademo (0)- lu Licensed(UDT+CP)/Effective UdtSqliPhtmPooledTotal ( 2 + 0 ) / 210001 UDTNO USRNBR UID USRNAME USRTYPE TTY IP-ADDRESS TIME DATE 1 2232 197615 wphaskett udt pts/1 192.168.1.51 14:36:27 Mar 13 2006 2 1844 197615 wphaskett udt pts/2 192.168.1.51 18:17:13 Mar 13 2006 2 Dtademo (0)- where E:\IBM\ud71\DtaDemo I'd like to allow some users to list all users logged onto their application (logged into their accounts) then give them the option to log them off. I'm not sure if this is possible in UniData. Any ideas would be appreciated. As always, thanks. :-) Bill Haskett Advantos Systems, Inc. www.advantos.net (760)944-5570 (CA) (360)923-4838 (WA) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Strange UDT Problem
UniData 6.0 I have some code that has a number of $INCLUDE lines in it, followed by line that read something like this: IF USER.ID = MYUSER THEN DEBUG followed by the rest of the program. I discovered that in several (but not all) of my UniData accounts, if this code was compiled with the -D option that the program would abort, sometimes completely terminating my UniData process. If I compiled it without the symbol table, it worked fine. If I commented out the offending line, it worked fine. If I added a couple of otherwise unrequired initializations (A=1; B=1), it worked fine. I searched everywhere for unprintable characters or other unininitialzed variables or other possible offenders without luck. Has anyone ever seen behaviour like this? Thanks, Kebbon --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Re:bci
Ray, I'm using a stored procedure with an output parameter. I've used SQLBindCol to execute sql directly, but does it also with stored procedures ? Thx, Rudy Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:45:02 +1000 From: Ray Wurlod [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] bci SQLBindParameter is for binding a variable to a parameter marker in the query to be executed. What you really need is SQLBindCol, which binds a variable to a column in the result set. If the number of return columns is N, you need N invocations of SQLBindCol (that is, you must consume all the columns in the result set, even if the application does nothing with some of them). You can dynamically determine the number of result columns with SQLNumResultCols. HTH Rudy Cooper Information Technology Project Technical Lead Sage Publications 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 Direct (805) 410-7724 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UD telnet server
Hi -- we have UDT 6.1.5 running on a Windows 2003 server with a 5 user license but every now and then , usually within a week, the telnet service hangs and no logins are possible. UDT itself is OK. Restarting the UD telnet service fails, so then reboot is called for. Colin Alfke mentioned it might be the WIMS service causing it , but doesn't appear so. Has anyone had this before? Thanks Steven Frost POWERCO 35 Junction Street Private Bag 2004 New Plymouth New Zealand Helpdesk 0800491491 DDI: +64 6 759 6583 Fax: +64 6 759 6253 Mob: +64 274 403940 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.powerco.co.nz # This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal # CAUTION: This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, copy, distribute, disclose or use this email or any attachments. If you have received this email in error, please notify us and erase this email and any attachments. You must scan this email and any attachments for viruses. DISCLAIMER: Powerco Limited accepts no liability for any loss, damage or other consequences, whether caused by its negligence or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or attachments or for any changes made to this email and any attachments after sending by Powerco Limited. The opinions expressed in this email and any attachments are not necessarily those of Powerco Limited. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Gigabit NIC
Hi all, I remember seeing something in the list a while back about Gigabit NIC cards and Universe but I can't seem to find a reference to it and the search still seems to be down. Does anyone know exactly what the problem is between Universe on Windows and Gigabit NIC cards? I believe that it had to do with the driver for the NIC card and I know that replacing the card with a 10/100 MB card was one solution, but that doesn't sit well with me or my customers. It's getting hard to tell a customer that their new fancy server with it's blazing Gig NIC needs to have it's network card downgraded in order to not have problems with our application. Can I simply change drivers? Do I need to upgrade or downgrade the driver? Thanks in advance... Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information Systems | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] Determine path logged on users are in
Bill Haskett wrote: I'd like to allow some users to list all users logged onto their application (logged into their accounts) then give them the option to log them off. I'm not sure if this is possible in UniData. Any ideas would be appreciated. As always, thanks. :-) On Unix it's easy with fuser on the VOC file - but you're on windows, so I don't have any insight. I'm pretty sure PORT.STATUS will give you what you need if you ask it nicely. Cheers, Ken --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] RE: Changes to the List
Charles wrote: We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Just one comment on this: After some investigation, at the request of several list members, I did change all of the digest lists' reply-to addresses back to their corresponding list addresses. The hassles of not being able to reply or even reply-all to a digest post outweighed the minor potential issues of reply-to confusing brain-dead mail servers, since the digest lists only send once per day (or thereabouts). Unfortunately, the same is not true for the regular lists which send out each post individually. Larry Hiscock Moderator --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changes to the List
We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? Personally, I think Larry made a good call, but this is a community, so I want me be sure that everyone gets heard. [snip] Thanks for asking, Chuck. If numbers are any indication, I've done some rough counts on my mail archive: - In the time period from feb/27 when this change was announced until today, mar/15, there were approximately 181 posts to this forum. I'm including posts prior to the announcement on that day as well generously including vacation posts, dupes, and other mis-haps which occurred. - In the same time period from the 27th of one month to the 15th of a consecutive month, going back for the last 6 months, this forum serves anywhere between 280ish to over 600 posts, with a guessed average of roughly about 390. (vague enough?) Given those numbers, it seems traffic here has dropped by almost half since the change. Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, but anything that (seemingly) cuts community traffic by this magnitude deserves some evaluation. HTH T --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changes to the List
I have noticed that their seems to be less traffic as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2006 5:01 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to the List We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? Personally, I think Larry made a good call, but this is a community, so I want me be sure that everyone gets heard. [snip] Thanks for asking, Chuck. If numbers are any indication, I've done some rough counts on my mail archive: - In the time period from feb/27 when this change was announced until today, mar/15, there were approximately 181 posts to this forum. I'm including posts prior to the announcement on that day as well generously including vacation posts, dupes, and other mis-haps which occurred. - In the same time period from the 27th of one month to the 15th of a consecutive month, going back for the last 6 months, this forum serves anywhere between 280ish to over 600 posts, with a guessed average of roughly about 390. (vague enough?) Given those numbers, it seems traffic here has dropped by almost half since the change. Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, but anything that (seemingly) cuts community traffic by this magnitude deserves some evaluation. HTH T --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List
On 3/15/06, u2ug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? My opinion hasn't changed. I think reply-to-sender kills discussions and does not serve the community well. I try to be careful about forwarding private mail to a public list, so now if I reply I have to double check where the original post went, and then fix the To: header. Reply-to-all is not a solution, it causes duplicate mail traffic and my filters flag replies as sent to me elevating their importance when it's not warranted. You can't please everyone, and there is no room for compromise on this. :::shrug::: It's not earth shattering, but since you asked... -- Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changes to the List
Goo'day, At 19:30 15/03/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote: Given those numbers, it seems traffic here has dropped by almost half since the change. Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, but anything that (seemingly) cuts community traffic by this magnitude deserves some evaluation. Would this dramatic reduction have something to do with Reply now only going to the poster - by default - instead of to the list? How many now know to Reply All if they want a moment of fame on the list? HTH T --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.2.4/282 - Release Date: 15/03/06 Regards, Bruce Nichol Talon Computer Services ALBURYNSW 2640 Australia http://www.taloncs.com.au Tel: +61 (0)411149636 Fax: +61 (0)260232119 If it ain't broke, fix it till it is! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.2.4/282 - Release Date: 15/03/06 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List
My two cents agrees with Wendy. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List On 3/15/06, u2ug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? My opinion hasn't changed. I think reply-to-sender kills discussions and does not serve the community well. I try to be careful about forwarding private mail to a public list, so now if I reply I have to double check where the original post went, and then fix the To: header. Reply-to-all is not a solution, it causes duplicate mail traffic and my filters flag replies as sent to me elevating their importance when it's not warranted. You can't please everyone, and there is no room for compromise on this. :::shrug::: It's not earth shattering, but since you asked... -- Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changes to the List
Bruce Nichol wrote: How many now know to Reply All if they want a moment of fame on the list? And this is another point. An announcement was made to the list, there was a hullabaloo for a few days and then it blew over. How many people missed that thread and don't know the secret handshake to send mail to this forum? How many people have tried to post a reponse, had a bounce or other interaction with some other forum member and just decided to not post? I can find no mention of How to Reply to Forum Mail with new instructions on the U2UG site. A new subscriber attempting a reply may conclude the list simply doesn't work. Is it expected that everyone will e-mail their confusion to the moderators? Welcome to real business: dis-satisfied or confused clients are more likely to walk away than complain or petition for change. Sure, I had issues up front, but I quickly adapt to change, so I really don't care what the policy is, and that's typical of anyone we see posting here. It's the people who aren't posting that you should be concerned about. When there is a policy that requires special action to do a common function, instructions should be easily available and quite clear. Suggestions: 1) Append this text to the footer applied to forum posts after the URL: See that page for information about posting and unsubscribing I'd say just bring the footer down to one line but I'm sure there are people using the footer for filtering, so it's probably not a good idea to change it. 2) Put documentation about how to reply on the http://listserver.u2ug.org/ page. 3) Put a clear link to that documentation on the Email Lists page accessible from the u2ug.org home page. Way over my 2 cents, sorry. T --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
