Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
On Jul 28, 2008, at 5:10 AM, "Michael Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity > > > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's >>> normal >>> to be that way. >>> >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are >>> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. >>> >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? >>> >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way >>> >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat more powerful than GDM . On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we > switched to > emerald? > > -- > Ubuntu FTW! > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory >> like >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) >> It uses more memory per window than metacity >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> > > > > -- > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art Optimized for Vista = Multicore CPU and 4 gigs of ram hmmm how does that make emerald which you claim to be a resource hog less appropriate on a system optimized for a resource hog? -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art The video card is crap -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
[ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
A good thing to know: To create debs withot ,using source. (e.g. I want to place my theme files in /X folder) 1. Create a folder called Mytheme-1.0 (Mytheme= The name and 1.0 is the version, change it to whatever you need) 2. Inside the folder, create a folder called DEBIAN. Inside DEBIAN create a text file called control. Paste this into control : Source: Mytheme Section: unknown Priority: extra Maintainer: Your name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5) Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Name: Mytheme Package: Mytheme Architecture: all Depends: ubuntu-desktop, libc6 (Change to make it install emerald or other stuff) Version: 1.0 (Change to suit your version Description: (You can add more things, but these are enought) 3. Delete the comentaries into the control file (Stuff in () ) 4. (Imagine we want to place the file jeje inside /usr/share/jeje ) Inside Mytheme-1.0 folder create a folder called usr . Inside usr create another one called share and place jeje inside share. Recreate the filesystem folders to place the files in their correct places. 5. Go to a folder above Mytheme-1.0 and run dpkg-deb -b /home/you/Desktop/Mytheme-1.0orwhereveristhefile Mytheme.deb 6. You are done! 7. Originally made by http://teratux.blogspot.com/2007/12/crear-paquetes-deb.html Feel free to complete this guide :) -- José Luis Ricón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Kim Kahns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everybody! > I now know how to create .debs. > > I made a Human 2 .deb which contain the GTK and Emerald theme. > It is attached, please try it. > > ~Kim Kahns (Kimmik) Kim, Fabulous work creating the package. You have just moved the art-team a tremendous step forward. -- Matthew Nuzum newz2000 on freenode -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
José Luis ha scritto: > I think the target PC is (IMO) a dual core PC, with 1 or 2 gigs of ram > and a gpu capable of running compiz at max anything. (Modern computers > usually have NVIDIA 8400 or better (Or ATI equivalents)) i think that compatibility with 3/4 years old pc should not be broken. a lot of pepole have hardware older then the one you propose. the above configuration is referred only to pc 'vista enabled' sold in the last few months. if microsoft wasn't able to impose vista on the market, due to its high hardware request, i can't see how someone could buy a new pc only to test the new amazing ubuntu gui. Max -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
[ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
I think the target PC is (IMO) a dual core PC, with 1 or 2 gigs of ram and a gpu capable of running compiz at max anything. (Modern computers usually have NVIDIA 8400 or better (Or ATI equivalents)) PD: This( http://picasaweb.google.com/ghatanothoa/CurrentProjects/photo#5227945564509952210 ) looks great. -- José Luis Ricón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok, > > > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity > > > > > > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) > >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's > >>> normal > >>> to be that way. > >>> > >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are > >>> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and > >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. > >>> > >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on > >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? > >>> > >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way > >>> > >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat > more > powerful than GDM . > > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we > > switched to > > emerald? > > > > -- > > Ubuntu FTW! > > > > -- > > ubuntu-art mailing list > > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ubuntu-art mailing list > >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >> > >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory > >> like > >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) > >> It uses more memory per window than metacity > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ubuntu-art mailing list > >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > > > -- > > ubuntu-art mailing list > > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > Optimized for Vista = Multicore CPU and 4 gigs of ram hmmm how does that make emerald which you claim to be a resource hog less appropriate on a system optimized for a resource hog? -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity > > > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's >>> normal >>> to be that way. >>> >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are >>> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. >>> >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? >>> >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way >>> >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat more powerful than GDM . On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we > switched to > emerald? > > -- > Ubuntu FTW! > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory >> like >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) >> It uses more memory per window than metacity >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> > > > > -- > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
ok, now just imagine that I can't observe that. Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) >> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal >> to be that way. >> >> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are >> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and >> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. >> >> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on >> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? >> >> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way >> >> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat >>> more >>> powerful than GDM . >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to emerald? -- Ubuntu FTW! -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nemes Ioan Sorin >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory like > someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) > It uses more memory per window than metacity > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) > being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal > to be that way. > > for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are > interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and > will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. > > Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on > without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? > > I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way > > 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat >> more >> powerful than GDM . >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to >>> emerald? >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu FTW! >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >> >> > > > > -- > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory like someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) It uses more memory per window than metacity -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal to be that way. for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat more > powerful than GDM . > > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to >> emerald? >> >> -- >> Ubuntu FTW! >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat more powerful than GDM . On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to > emerald? > > -- > Ubuntu FTW! > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb
this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to emerald? -- Ubuntu FTW! -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
