On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;)
> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal
> to be that way.
>
> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are
> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and
> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem.
>
> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on
> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ??
>
> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way
>
> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat
>> more
>> powerful than GDM .
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to
>>> emerald?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu FTW!
>>>
>>> --
>>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nemes Ioan Sorin
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory like
someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara)
It uses more memory per window than metacity
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
