2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok, > > > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity > > > > > > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) > >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's > >>> normal > >>> to be that way. > >>> > >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are > >>> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and > >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. > >>> > >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on > >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? > >>> > >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way > >>> > >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat > >>>> more > >>>> powerful than GDM . > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we > >>>>> switched to > >>>>> emerald? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Ubuntu FTW! > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> ubuntu-art mailing list > >>>>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> ubuntu-art mailing list > >>>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ubuntu-art mailing list > >>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >> > >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory > >> like > >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) > >> It uses more memory per window than metacity > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ubuntu-art mailing list > >> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > > > -- > > ubuntu-art mailing list > > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >
Optimized for Vista = Multicore CPU and 4 gigs of ram.... hmmm how does that make emerald which you claim to be a resource hog less appropriate on a system optimized for a resource hog?
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
