Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread raihan hasnain
How could you know? First install both Fedora 9 and Ubuntu 8.04 try to use
theme side by side for few days ... and if possible try Mint 5 beta and
opensolaris 2008.5 as well... then talk.

I see you are Fedora Ambassador for Bangladesh meaning whatever I say
you'll hear blah blah blah. Still, for others I am sharing a piece of
information.

Fedora Project is a Open Source project of famous RED HAT. Officially
Fedora is the open source (of RED HAT) movement but in real it is the crash
test dummy of RED HAT. Whatever gets stable and widely accepted by the users
goes into Red Hat Enterprise Linux with fully non-free support. Yes Fedora
will always give you the taste of latest technology, as it includes all
latest, unstable and test versions together. Check out this feature-list
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList ... aren't all the
features look shiny comparing to any other OS? Of course yes.

I am not biased to any Linux. I am more a fan of Linux Mint than Ubuntu ...
as it comes with all the features that a free OS can offer (with non-free
stuff). I personally promote Linux as an OS not any specific distro. Having
thousands of distributions it became a matter of choice for the users. They
must use whatever they like.

Now if you make a novice user to use a distro which has all latest stuff,
but is unstable in many ways. Do you expect the user to be happy? [Fedora
lovers would say: WHY NOT!, Debian lovers would say: WTF! ]

I have tried many distros (that inlcudes Red Hat 6, 7,  9, Fedora 2, 3 , 4,
5, 6, 7, 8) and trust me, Ubuntu felt most comfortable (well actually Mint
4.0, but it is entirely Ubuntu).



On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Try to take everything positively. It's a news about, what people think
 about Fedora and Ubuntu. That's the reason to post it here. Nobody is
 arguing here.

 *P.S. 5 hours ago, F9 released, I guess, you didnt install it yet, when
 you was reading that article. So how could you know, nothing is new? First
 install it, then talk.*



 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:02 AM, raihan hasnain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Thanks for sharing such a nice article. It was so informative that I
  just formatted my Mac OS X 10.5.2 and installing Fedora 9 over it. The
  article was so manipulating!
 
 
  By the way this is the comment I have posted on that blog ...
 
  You gotta be kidding me! Why Ubuntu has to run for money? It is a free
   product :|
  
   All the features Fedora 9 included are already exist in other distros,
   so I couldn't find anything new. (I am using Ubuntu in flash drive for
   months).
  
   Can you explain why exactly Ubuntu has to run for money? The title
   seems interesting but totally lacks any sort of explanation.
  
   Canonical LTD. is dedicated to promote free software and is the
   official sponsor of Ubuntu. It is funded by Mark Shuttleworth, who is not 
   a
   poor guy at all. Being a really nice distribution and having a HUGE
   community, I don't see any point of running out of money.
  
   May be you have some important points that I (we) don't know. Waiting
   for the reply.
 
  *
  P.S. I didn't see a single point arguing that this or that is the reason
  that is why Ubuntu is the competitor of Fedora (which is the opposite in
  real), therefore may I know the reason of mailing this worthless article's
  link in a Ubuntu mailing list? Fedora 9 is released just few hours ago, and
  already people are claiming that **Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its
  Money. Pathetic!*
 
 
 
  On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hi
  
   http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/05/fedora-9-gives.html
  
   Digg It:
  
   http://digg.com/linux_unix/Fedora_9_Gives_Ubuntu_a_Run_For_Its_Money
  
   Fedora 9 is a significant upgrade and packs in a number of new
   features. Perhaps the best part of Fedora 9 is the new live USB options.
   After playing with the release candidate for a week or so I am happy to
   report that Fedora 9 has made some significant strides and gives Ubuntu a
   serious run for its money when it comes ot user-friendliness. 
  
  
   --
   Angel
   GPG key: 0xC4639705
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman
  
   --
   ubuntu-bd mailing list
   ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
  
  
 
  --
  ubuntu-bd mailing list
  ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
 
 


 --
 Angel
 GPG key: 0xC4639705
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman

 --
 ubuntu-bd mailing list
 ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


-- 
ubuntu-bd mailing list
ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread Angel
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList

Hi,
Please check the date of the last edited time of the wiki page.
Releases/9/FeatureList (last edited 2008-04-21 02:13:14 by
JohnPoelstrahttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra)
. It was after releasing the preview release. A while ago Fedora released,
we could not change the whole website yet. You don't even know about the
differences between Fedora and Red Hat. You are talking about our Myths[1].



[1]  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:08 AM, raihan hasnain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 How could you know? First install both Fedora 9 and Ubuntu 8.04 try to use
 theme side by side for few days ... and if possible try Mint 5 beta and
 opensolaris 2008.5 as well... then talk.

 I see you are Fedora Ambassador for Bangladesh meaning whatever I say
 you'll hear blah blah blah. Still, for others I am sharing a piece of
 information.

 Fedora Project is a Open Source project of famous RED HAT. Officially
 Fedora is the open source (of RED HAT) movement but in real it is the crash
 test dummy of RED HAT. Whatever gets stable and widely accepted by the users
 goes into Red Hat Enterprise Linux with fully non-free support. Yes Fedora
 will always give you the taste of latest technology, as it includes all
 latest, unstable and test versions together. Check out this feature-list
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList ... aren't all the
 features look shiny comparing to any other OS? Of course yes.

 I am not biased to any Linux. I am more a fan of Linux Mint than Ubuntu
 ... as it comes with all the features that a free OS can offer (with
 non-free stuff). I personally promote Linux as an OS not any specific
 distro. Having thousands of distributions it became a matter of choice for
 the users. They must use whatever they like.

 Now if you make a novice user to use a distro which has all latest stuff,
 but is unstable in many ways. Do you expect the user to be happy? [Fedora
 lovers would say: WHY NOT!, Debian lovers would say: WTF! ]

 I have tried many distros (that inlcudes Red Hat 6, 7,  9, Fedora 2, 3 ,
 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) and trust me, Ubuntu felt most comfortable (well actually
 Mint 4.0, but it is entirely Ubuntu).




 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Try to take everything positively. It's a news about, what people think
  about Fedora and Ubuntu. That's the reason to post it here. Nobody is
  arguing here.
 
  *P.S. 5 hours ago, F9 released, I guess, you didnt install it yet, when
  you was reading that article. So how could you know, nothing is new? First
  install it, then talk.*
 
 
 
  On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:02 AM, raihan hasnain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
   Thanks for sharing such a nice article. It was so informative that I
   just formatted my Mac OS X 10.5.2 and installing Fedora 9 over it. The
   article was so manipulating!
  
  
   By the way this is the comment I have posted on that blog ...
  
   You gotta be kidding me! Why Ubuntu has to run for money? It is a free
product :|
   
All the features Fedora 9 included are already exist in other
distros, so I couldn't find anything new. (I am using Ubuntu in flash 
drive
for months).
   
Can you explain why exactly Ubuntu has to run for money? The title
seems interesting but totally lacks any sort of explanation.
   
Canonical LTD. is dedicated to promote free software and is the
official sponsor of Ubuntu. It is funded by Mark Shuttleworth, who is 
not a
poor guy at all. Being a really nice distribution and having a HUGE
community, I don't see any point of running out of money.
   
May be you have some important points that I (we) don't know.
Waiting for the reply.
  
   *
   P.S. I didn't see a single point arguing that this or that is the
   reason that is why Ubuntu is the competitor of Fedora (which is the 
   opposite
   in real), therefore may I know the reason of mailing this worthless
   article's link in a Ubuntu mailing list? Fedora 9 is released just few 
   hours
   ago, and already people are claiming that **Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a
   Run For Its Money. Pathetic!*
  
  
  
   On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
  
Hi
   
http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/05/fedora-9-gives.html
   
Digg It:
   
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Fedora_9_Gives_Ubuntu_a_Run_For_Its_Money
   
Fedora 9 is a significant upgrade and packs in a number of new
features. Perhaps the best part of Fedora 9 is the new live USB options.
After playing with the release candidate for a week or so I am happy to
report that Fedora 9 has made some significant strides and gives Ubuntu 
a
serious run for its money when it comes ot user-friendliness. 
   
   
--
Angel
GPG key: 0xC4639705
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman
   
--
ubuntu-bd mailing list

Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread Nasimul Haque
Fedora is a nice distro which is actually a minefield for RedHat. I
salute RedHat for their contribution to the open source community, all
the technologies they have invented and implemented like SELinux,
paravirtualization tools etc. But Fedora is not for Joe user. It is
kind of geeky distribution to test new technologies. I can give
numerous examples of user-unfriendliness of Fedora. Let me give a few.
First of all, you need to add unsupported extra repositories like
livna, freshrpms, rpmfusion etc. to install packages and which is not
as user-friendly as Synaptic. In Synaptic there is a GUI to add extra
repos easily. There is no simple way to add CD/DVD repositories into
thee package manager yum, which in Debian, Ubuntu is as simple as
inserting the CD/DVD. If the CD is not automatically added, you can
easily add it by running apt-cdrom add or use Synaptic. In
Debian/Ubuntu there is a super-duper tool to install manually compiled
software into the package manager, it is called checkinstall. I can go
on like this.

Although Fedora or other distros are inventing new things and Ubuntu
is doing just package management. I will use Ubuntu. APT is so good
that I use it on my Mac too. I install all the linux software via fink
which uses APT.

Nasim
-- 
M. Nasimul Haque, M.Sc.(SUST)
Wessex Institute of Technology
Southampton, UK

-- 
ubuntu-bd mailing list
ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread Masum Masum
Dear Friends,
I have joined in this mailing list with the hope that -

1. I am a Novice Linux user so I'll get support from my local community.
2. Though support is available in the International forum but here I'll be
able to express easily in my own language.
3. I'll be able to meet like minded people physically as we are in the same
country
4. I'll get to know about any software developed in open source in my
language
5. I'll be able to help other beginners with my little knowledge
6. As so many distro available I'll get to know the good and bad side of
them and find suitable one for me.
7. Get to know the technical side of Linux OS.

Unfortunately the mails I'm receiving is not very encouraging. Guys it's not
a debate club. Plz share the knowledge and keep your superiority coimplex
for somewhere else. Thanx.

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:16 AM, raihan hasnain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 No you forgot it was a Ubuntu-BD mailing list. There is a mailing list for
 all general distros where everyone can post about any distro.

 If your mail had something to do with Ubuntu, that was absolutely fine.
 Instead, you are bluntly speaking against Ubuntu to promote Fedora as better
 distro. If you had strong arguments for it, that would have helped us as
 well.

 I already have said. I have no problems with Fedora. Do not get me wrong.

 Again, you have not replied it yet. Why have you mailed the worthless
 article's link in the first place? Which did not have any point justifying
 the articles title.

 * **Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money*. Someone should have
 strong points, examples, information and references to prove this huge
 statement.

 I am planning to write a new article. Damn Small Linux gives Apple,
 Microsoft and SUN a run for its money. But hey, I already have two strong
 points ... DSL is small and free!




 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Yes. I am sorry, it was my fault to sending such a mail to this list. I
  forget, here we all are Bangalis.
  Thank you all.
  :)
 
 
  On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Nasimul Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
   Fedora is a nice distro which is actually a minefield for RedHat. I
   salute RedHat for their contribution to the open source community, all
   the technologies they have invented and implemented like SELinux,
   paravirtualization tools etc. But Fedora is not for Joe user. It is
   kind of geeky distribution to test new technologies. I can give
   numerous examples of user-unfriendliness of Fedora. Let me give a few.
   First of all, you need to add unsupported extra repositories like
   livna, freshrpms, rpmfusion etc. to install packages and which is not
   as user-friendly as Synaptic. In Synaptic there is a GUI to add extra
   repos easily. There is no simple way to add CD/DVD repositories into
   thee package manager yum, which in Debian, Ubuntu is as simple as
   inserting the CD/DVD. If the CD is not automatically added, you can
   easily add it by running apt-cdrom add or use Synaptic. In
   Debian/Ubuntu there is a super-duper tool to install manually compiled
   software into the package manager, it is called checkinstall. I can go
   on like this.
  
   Although Fedora or other distros are inventing new things and Ubuntu
   is doing just package management. I will use Ubuntu. APT is so good
   that I use it on my Mac too. I install all the linux software via fink
   which uses APT.
  
   Nasim
   --
   M. Nasimul Haque, M.Sc.(SUST)
   Wessex Institute of Technology
   Southampton, UK
  
   --
   ubuntu-bd mailing list
   ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
  
 
 
 
  --
  Angel
  GPG key: 0xC4639705
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman
 
  --
  ubuntu-bd mailing list
  ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
 
 

 --
 ubuntu-bd mailing list
 ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


-- 
ubuntu-bd mailing list
ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread Shahriar Tariq
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes. I am sorry, it was my fault to sending such a mail to this list. I
 forget, here we all are Bangalis.
 Thank you all.
 :)

I really had respect for you untill now... what kind of nationalism and
enthusiasm you show when you utter remarks like this??!!! I simply hate this
kind of remarks. YOU ARE ALSO A BANGALI ANGEL AND YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THAT.
Dont try to bypass something by saying stereotypes like Bangalis will never
improve, Bangalis dont have any knowledge, Bangalis are always stupid, Its
hard to work with Bangalis.

We are the next generation, ITS OUR DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY TO CHANGE IT!
You and I should work to Change these stereotypes. You and I, both are from
the same genaration. But it seems our working paterns are different. You
tend to work in hot temper and make remarks that are destructive for both
your image and your group

If you think that some trends must be break through, some myths needed to be
changed. Then work on it... change the myths. Encourage people to use
Fedora. Counter point your oponents, instead of doing that you are waging
war!! this way you are alianing yourself as well as Fedora. The more you
make bad remarks the more people will say negetive about Fedora. This is
harmfull for your purpose.

On my note I have never used Fedora personally, so I dont have any idea
regarding it. But I can say from my years of reading articles, many welknown
reviewer/enthusiasts have put Fedora as a test baby for Red Hat Enterprise.
And even on the release note it is evedent. on the FreeAPI you please read
the last line and explain it to me since you ARE NON BENGALI and YOU
UNDERSTAND ENGLISH WELL

Anyway I hope you will be cautious in the future to make remarks..

I am looking forward
-- 
Thanking you
Shahriar
-- 
ubuntu-bd mailing list
ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd


Re: [ Ubuntu-BD ] Fedora 9 Gives Ubuntu a Run For Its Money

2008-05-13 Thread Shahriar Tariq
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Masum Masum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear Friends,
 I have joined in this mailing list with the hope that -

 1. I am a Novice Linux user so I'll get support from my local community.
 2. Though support is available in the International forum but here I'll be
 able to express easily in my own language.
 3. I'll be able to meet like minded people physically as we are in the
 same country
 4. I'll get to know about any software developed in open source in my
 language
 5. I'll be able to help other beginners with my little knowledge
 6. As so many distro available I'll get to know the good and bad side of
 them and find suitable one for me.
 7. Get to know the technical side of Linux OS.

 Unfortunately the mails I'm receiving is not very encouraging. Guys it's
 not a debate club. Plz share the knowledge and keep your superiority
 coimplex for somewhere else. Thanx.

I support Masum Vai. Enough is said here... lets save these debates for a
debate  competition. Or you may post your view in BLUA forum where thoughts
are open as long as you are not personally hurting anyone's feelings or
making outragious remarks about Bangalis or Bangladeshis..

Humm Special note to Russell vai, I have a great idea now :D. you were
saying our BLUA group has been inactive lately why not arrange a debete
competition?? it seems all the experts as well as the novices are eager to
have their views and voices be heard... So lets arrange it ;p what you say??

-- 
Thanking you
Shahriar
-- 
ubuntu-bd mailing list
ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd