[Bug 1635174] [NEW] Launcher icon doesn't switch to application on different workspace
Public bug reported: Old wine to the new bottles. I am experiencing the same issue as in #1228352: If I choose a launcher icon with application running on different workspace the workspace won't switch. (Menu for an app will appear on upper bar.) 1) Release Ubuntu 16.04 2) Compiz version 0.9.12.2 ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1635174 Title: Launcher icon doesn't switch to application on different workspace To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1635174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831308] Re: Evolution crash when copy/move contact between address books
Has just happened to me on 12.04LTS (encrypted home folder) after an extended period of non-use. Bug #822479 refers? Triggered by trying to move a contact from one address book to another (coincidentally prehaps, to the last address book on the alphabetically sorted list) Reproduced giving a message Ubuntu 12.04LTS has encountered an error - duly reported - twice within the past half hour or so before this report. The error killed Evolution but not the OS. Evolution was reloaded for the second try (from the top panel icon) so: If there is a memory leak it is leaking from the OS (ie when Ubuntu killed the running instance of Evolution it didn't get the memory back) On the other hand it could be Evolution not managing to move the address book entry for some other reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831308 Title: Evolution crash when copy/move contact between address books To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/831308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831308] Re: Evolution crash when copy/move contact between address books
It is possible there was already a copy in the destination folder - impossible to know now. Trying again with Firefox open crashed Evolution (closed it) without triggering an Ubuntu error message. The source entry will be deleted having confirmed there is a destination copy. Email me if I can be of further help. I have work to do building a new address book for a new topic. I will do so without restarting & report anything more of note. uptime: 17:06:59 up 8 days, 4:08, 2 users, load average: 1.22, 0.59, 0.53 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831308 Title: Evolution crash when copy/move contact between address books To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/831308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791208] Re: Evolution is still forgetting pop3 passwords
Happens to me too from time to time. 12.04LTS Encrypted home folder. Sometimes left running for extended periods. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791208 Title: Evolution is still forgetting pop3 passwords To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/791208/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1268297] Re: Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide)
Thanks. We can only do what we can do! DrC On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:30 +, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > Your thoughts are well understood, DrC. > > I suppose one possibility would be to make Google Earth available in the > Canonical Partners repository in the same way as e.g. Skype. That way > users would be able to install it through the Ubuntu Software Centre. > Don't know the prerequisites for doing that, though. > > @Steve: Is this possibly something you have considered? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268297 Title: Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1268297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268297] Re: Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide)
OK - it's all installed now, but it was nothing l;ike as easy as it is for a Windows user & that's the problem that concerns me. The fact that I can sudo and write console commands and pretty well know what I am doing isn't really the point. Would it be possible for a failed search for an application to point a windows-level user at an explanation of how non-supported popular software such as Google Earth is dealt with? Is there any way ythe console steps can be hidden from the user? I leave you with the thoughts - which don't need a response. II'm sure you've heard them before - just count me as yet another respondent on that score. Thanks for being there. DrC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268297 Title: Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1268297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268297] [NEW] Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide)
Public bug reported: 1. By its very nature resolving #327770 might solve this too. I didn't find the How To. 2. Context - I am trying to install Google World. If that is not a supported process, and if you deliberately do not support the Google install it would be nice to have a pointer somewhere to that sort of possibility. 3. I could not find it in the Ubuntu store. I finally found it (for Ubuntu 64bit) using Google search. It downloaded (Firefox) & afteer some long worrying silences (not good) & some prodding (even worse?) the Ubuntu installer said it was installing. Google said thankyou (web page) 4. I have done a warm restart because I could not find it on my desktop. I still can't find it as a user. 5. If I sudo, find it and manage to launch it, it is not clear how I then would iconise the process. Ths bug report is explaining why I think the user guide will not meet the needs of a 'user' who would like to install Google Earth. A work- around would be very welcome but it is not the real point! There are generic gaps in the user guide which this specific problem exposes. Thanks ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubuntu-docs 12.04.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-58.88-generic 3.2.53 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-58-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 12 12:51:50 2014 EcryptfsInUse: Yes MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-docs UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2013-10-01 (102 days ago) ** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268297 Title: Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1268297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Thanks for the workaround but I'll stick with the released version for now (and on this 'production' system). Here are the initial versions of files and the final versions. I took the brief opportunity when all seemed to be working to restore VATform from the redone desktiop copy I made when it first looked like it was going bad. The copies you have are both from my Desktop. There was temporary data loss on VATform - with neither archive manager nor LibreOffice finding anything in the server copy but stat reported 40 blocks via putty. BTW both SAMBA servers are now returning invalid parameter when I try to 'Connect to server' so it looks like Ubuntu is hurting. Could not display "smb://workgroup;cwsup@gateway/cwsup/". Could not display "smb://workgroup;cwsup@172.16.90.48/cwsup/". for both: Error: Invalid argument Please select another viewer and try again. I'm running out of time here so I'm afraid since the task is sorted I have to go out. Unless there's something from you asking otherwise I will be rebooting Ubuntu on my return. Thanks for all you guys do - hope I'm helping ... DrC ** Attachment added: "tar-gz of the previous version of files and the eventual updated versions" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+attachment/3903246/+files/CalcFreezeFiles.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
No problem accessing OOo text documents on a different SAMBA server (no calc documents there) so it really does seem to be a Calc-Samba issue. The original SAMBA server was quite badly bogged down in that other processes (eg Adobe-PDF accesses) were slow but all seems to be working OK now. Final test is to leave a calc window open & see what happenms -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Yes - seems to be LibreOffice-Samba. PDFs in the same folder open OF but when clicked on a calc document, after a long delay LibreOffice Calc returned invalid parameter. (screenshot) ** Attachment added: "Ubuntu screenshot - .png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+attachment/3903157/+files/Screenshot%20from%202013-11-08%2012%3A52%3A17.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Oops - PDFs open OK. OF was a mistype. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Yes - the otherwise very reliable server also freezes when Calc locks up. >From a different workspace: Could not display "smb://workgroup;cwsup@172.16.90.48/cwsup/". Error: Invalid argument Please select another viewer and try again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Slow learner! It has happened again with a selection of cells I 'Special Pasted' into a report on a second Calc window. Both windows froze up when I wen to save the second sheet. Hmm ... Could be relevant - both target files were opened over a Samba connection. The client symptoms might be a consequence of an old Debian server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
Whilst reporting these issues the application has come back to life - either unravelled itself or been kicked by something! Cheers DrC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] Re: Soffice Calc freezes
The issues with Help have been reported as bug #1249315 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249315] [NEW] Problems reporting a bug
Public bug reported: This is a usability issue, not a software bug. Bug #1249305 refers: (LibreOffice Calc frozen) My problem was not knowing the package name: The HELP that told me to use ALT-F2 could usefully have told me the application package names current in the stack for me to choose from. My initial guess was not recognised after a long search! Not knowing the name, I tried ubuntu-bug with no argument. Nothing. After re-reading the help I used ps to find the PID (hardly a user facility!) & used the PID as the argument. May I suggest a drop down package selector based on the applications using the largest open files in user space could help the reporting process. Thanks DrC PS Is it deliberately hard to find how to report a bug on opening a new Launchpad window? I failed, and only got here by using 'open in a new window" on the bug report you opened automativcally for me. Information hand pasted from bug #1249305: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: Help ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-55.85-generic 3.2.51 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-55-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 8 10:55:01 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2013-10-01 (37 days ago) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249315 Title: Problems reporting a bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249305] [NEW] Soffice Calc freezes
Public bug reported: Calc frozen. 1. several data fields successfully edited 2. Cell A258 (with value ="1307" copied down into cell A259 3. Cell A259 edited to ="1310" 4. Cell A259 dragged down a further 5 cells to A264 wit the range of 6 cells highlighted. Left the computer to get information about further edits - the range could have been highlighted for a few minutes. Returned to try further edits to find it frozen. Several issues reporting this problem relate to the bug reporting and will be the subject of further reports unless something goes wrong in the meantime (I could be called away) in summary: Not knowing the package name - the HELP that told me to use ALT-F2 could usefully have told me the application package names current in the stack for me to choose from. My initial guess was not recognised after a long search! Not knowing the name, I tried ubuntu-bug with no argument. Nothing. After re-reading the help I used ps to find the PID (hardly a user facility!) & used the PID as the argument. May I suggest a drop down package selector based on the applications using the largest open files in user space could help the reporting process. Thanks DrC ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.5.7-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-55.85-generic 3.2.51 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-55-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 8 10:55:01 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2013-10-01 (37 days ago) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305 Title: Soffice Calc freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1249305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366923] Re: nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type()
Can be closed - an installation issue on an old version - not seen since. Possibly a hardware issue - the hardware concerned is no longer in use. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366923 Title: nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/366923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874258] Re: Draw cursor not showing
OK - tried that, looked at the recorded video and the cursor was visible on the recording even though it wasn't on the screen while the recording was being made. If we track it down we might have a bug report for recordmydesktop ... Sorry for the delay - the problem environment involves a part time job that has kept me a bit busy for the last few weeks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874258 Title: Draw cursor not showing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/874258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874258] Re: Draw cursor not showing
PS - I tried it at home on the Unity GUI and it was OK, which may explain the lack of deafening complaints. It is only on the classic GUI, which the work system reverted to because the hardware was not capable enough. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874258 Title: Draw cursor not showing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/874258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874258] Re: Draw cursor not showing
This is not solely Ubuntu - also happens on my WinXP box with different hardware. I don't have an account on their bug tracker (and would prefer not to open one because of their privacy arrangements) so would you mind processing it please? Just don't bother looking through Ubuntu first. Can't find it on their public bug list. I am now even more puzzled as to why it has not already been reported ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874258 Title: Draw cursor not showing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/874258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874258] Re: Draw cursor not showing
Oops - I should make it clear it is the Select pointer that does not show. If I choose an object type to draw the cross hairs render as I would expect. DrC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874258 Title: Draw cursor not showing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/874258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874258] [NEW] Draw cursor not showing
Public bug reported: May be my graphics card if others are not seeing it. Please tell me if you need more info. Problem is that whilst I can see the x- and y- markers as I move the mouse, the arrow2 pointer is only visible intermittently, and then only when I am over a 'handle' or other feature that changes the cursor image. 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 3200/3210 Chipset DRAM Controller (rev 01) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f3 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Capabilities: [e0] Vendor Specific Information: Len=0c Kernel driver in use: i3200_edac Kernel modules: i3200_edac 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 3200/3210 Chipset Host-Primary PCI Express Bridge (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Physical Slot: 4 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 Capabilities: [88] Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2982 Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Capabilities: [a0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [140] Root Complex Link Kernel driver in use: pcieport Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 I/O ports at 1820 [size=32] Capabilities: [50] PCI Advanced Features Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 I/O ports at 1840 [size=32] Capabilities: [50] PCI Advanced Features Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 I/O ports at 1860 [size=32] Capabilities: [50] PCI Advanced Features Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at ec00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00a0 Capabilities: [98] PCI Advanced Features Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Physical Slot: 2 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 2000-2fff Memory behind bridge: 4000-401f Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 4020-403f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00 Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [180] Root Complex Link Kernel driver in use: pcieport Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Physical Slot: 2 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=0d, subordinate=0d, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 3000-3fff Memory behind bridge: ec10-ecff Prefetchable memory behind bridge: ee00-eeff Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00 Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 31f4 Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [180] Root Complex Link Kernel driver in use: pcieport Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Physical Slot: 2 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=0e, subordinate=0e, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 4000-4fff Memory behind bridge: ed00-ed0f Prefetchable memory behind bridge:
[Bug 666281] Re: Firefox Print Preview curtailed
Pretty much the same on XP-SP3 with 256Mb RAM. Seems to be a when-to-get-a-new-page issue. If I print preview it at 30% zoom I see a lot more of the 'second' page on the second sheet. Confirmed in all three environments. -- Firefox Print Preview curtailed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666281] Re: Firefox Print Preview curtailed
Just checked on an old Windows system - different curtailment point. Firefox 3.0.5 on Windows XP SP2 ** Attachment added: "gif showing a later curtailment point on a different system" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/666281/+attachment/1710494/+files/PreviewBugOnXP-SP2.gif -- Firefox Print Preview curtailed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666281] Re: Firefox Print Preview curtailed
** Attachment added: "tgz with screenshots showing page url, problem." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281/+attachment/1710460/+files/FirefoxPreviewBug.tar.gz -- Firefox Print Preview curtailed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666281] [NEW] Firefox Print Preview curtailed
Public bug reported: See screen shots - Ubuntu 10.04 (LTS) is up to date. Chris ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Firefox Print Preview curtailed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223216] Re: evolution crashes when backup
Lucid seems good and solid. Have the developers done anything like tidying up that might have cleaned out the bug? If so, I would be comfortable closing it. -- evolution crashes when backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
Oops - misunderstanding ... The problem appeared - possibly as a result of a recent update. It affected the output from xrandr, and that, or some other effect of the problem meant I had an effectively unusable system. I have seen the same effect before on earlier versions - and had to reinstall to get round it. It is too rare for me to correlate it with version or particular hardware. The problem went away while I was investigating it - there was no update to make it go away; I think something I did cleared something. But since I cannot identify either something it doesn't help anybody much. But nor does a misunderstanding. My var/log/apt record shows the Xorg update that triggered the problem (dated 18 Aug) and the absence of any update since. I suspect something in the update caused my problem. ** Attachment added: "var-log-apt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/620581/+attachment/1511737/+files/var-log-apt.tar.gz ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
>From Kurt: Are you still affected by this bug? The system seemed to be working OK again. I've quarantined it pro tem in case there is anything it may still have that is of interest. If nobody shows any interest in its present state I'll put it back in service and see what happens. I am still a quivering wreck ;) Seriously, I have seen a few display issues that I can't get to grips with (ie can't consistently reproduce) and they do niggle. Thanks for being there, guys and gals. -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
And finally, just to prove to myself I am not dreaming e...@lucid-eddy:~$ xrandr --verbose Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 1440 x 1050 default connected 800x600+0+0 (0x115) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x108 Timestamp: 16713730 Subpixel: no subpixels Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
** Attachment added: "working-again-logs.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500928/+files/working-again-logs.tar.gz -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
OK - more checks ... in the course of which something reset itself ... Switching to other accounts and back showed they were unaffected. They still had the high res options.. Browsing hidden files in home of the affected account (the first user created and the user first logged on to after updating) looking at those updated recently revealed nothing of interest. Right click desktop to change background displayed choices but selecting one had no effect. Theme install (never done that before) with my already preferred clearview still selected was cancelled when it asked for s directory. Visual effects (currently None) asked for drivers when changed to Normal mode, then went into a flashing loop when cancelled from not being able to find them. Eventually stopped - not sure what I did to stop it. Selected a new background. New background looked good. Went back to Preferences-Monitor and found the big list now available ??? e...@lucid-eddy:~$ xrandr --verbose Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1280 x 960, maximum 1440 x 1050 default connected 1280x960+0+0 (0x10c) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x108 Timestamp: 15521392 Subpixel: no subpixels Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: 1400x1050 (0x109) 88.2MHz h: width 1400 start0 end0 total 1400 skew0 clock 63.0KHz v: height 1050 start0 end0 total 1050 clock 60.0Hz 1280x1024 (0x10a) 78.6MHz h: width 1280 start0 end0 total 1280 skew0 clock 61.4KHz v: height 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 clock 60.0Hz 1440x900 (0x10b) 77.8MHz h: width 1440 start0 end0 total 1440 skew0 clock 54.0KHz v: height 900 start0 end0 total 900 clock 60.0Hz 1280x960 (0x10c) 73.7MHz *current h: width 1280 start0 end0 total 1280 skew0 clock 57.6KHz v: height 960 start0 end0 total 960 clock 60.0Hz 1360x768 (0x10d) 62.7MHz h: width 1360 start0 end0 total 1360 skew0 clock 46.1KHz v: height 768 start0 end0 total 768 clock 60.0Hz 1152x864 (0x10e) 74.6MHz h: width 1152 start0 end0 total 1152 skew0 clock 64.8KHz v: height 864 start0 end0 total 864 clock 75.0Hz 1152x864 (0x10f) 69.7MHz h: width 1152 start0 end0 total 1152 skew0 clock 60.5KHz v: height 864 start0 end0 total 864 clock 70.0Hz 1152x864 (0x110) 59.7MHz h: width 1152 start0 end0 total 1152 skew0 clock 51.8KHz v: height 864 start0 end0 total 864 clock 60.0Hz 1024x768 (0x111) 59.0MHz h: width 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 skew0 clock 57.6KHz v: height 768 start0 end0 total 768 clock 75.0Hz 1024x768 (0x112) 55.1MHz h: width 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 skew0 clock 53.8KHz v: height 768 start0 end0 total 768 clock 70.0Hz 1024x768 (0x113) 47.2MHz h: width 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 skew0 clock 46.1KHz v: height 768 start0 end0 total 768 clock 60.0Hz 832x624 (0x114) 38.9MHz h: width 832 start0 end0 total 832 skew0 clock 46.8KHz v: height 624 start0 end0 total 624 clock 75.0Hz 800x600 (0x115) 28.8MHz h: width 800 start0 end0 total 800 skew0 clock 36.0KHz v: height 600 start0 end0 total 600 clock 60.0Hz 800x600 (0x116) 36.0MHz h: width 800 start0 end0 total 800 skew0 clock 45.0KHz v: height 600 start0 end0 total 600 clock 75.0Hz 800x600 (0x117) 34.6MHz h: width 800 start0 end0 total 800 skew0 clock 43.2KHz v: height 600 start0 end0 total 600 clock 72.0Hz xdpyinfo includes: screen #0: dimensions:1280x960 pixels (10x10 millimeters) resolution:3251x2438 dots per inch depths (7):24, 1, 4, 8, 15, 16, 32 root window id:0x102 depth of root window:24 planes number of colormaps:minimum 1, maximum 1 default colormap:0x20 default number of colormap cells:256 preallocated pixels:black 0, white 16777215 options:backing-store NO, save-unders NO largest cursor:64x64 current input event mask:0xfa8033 KeyPressMask KeyReleaseMask EnterWindowMask LeaveWindowMask ExposureMask StructureNotifyMask SubstructureNotifyMask SubstructureRedirectMask FocusCha
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
Thinking out loud - Guest session does not go through the login process. There is also a new log file . ** Attachment added: "New log file created during guest session" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500705/+files/guest-session-new-log-files.tar.gz -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
Hmmm.. Changing to guest account gives me all the screen resolutions again, with the top one active at 60Hz. ** Attachment added: "screenshot of good resolutions" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500651/+files/Screenshot.png -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] Re: Reduced screen resolution choices after update
Attached log files ** Attachment added: "recent /var/log files" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500630/+files/Xorg-logs.tar.gz -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620581] [NEW] Reduced screen resolution choices after update
Public bug reported: may relate to #500687 System - a reference lucid system from 10.04 lucid CD downloaded late July, all updates, no tweaks, mostly working to local servers but inevitably with a bit of local work accumulation. Following the latest update which included an X- package, my screen resolution is now limited to 800x600 - which many websites and many Ubuntu utilities no not support graciously. Previously (lucid release CD with all updates except the last batch) I chose 1024x768 from a list that included several higher resolutions, all of which worked on my MBO e-tron 770 monitor (17 inch CRT, 'Unknown' on the System-Preferences-Monitors utility) If really necessary I can reinstall and not update to get earlier diagnostics but I would want to be sure I am getting the right stuff for you, and that I need to, before tearing this system down. xdpyinfo includes the following - clearly not right for a 17 inch monitor: screen #0: dimensions:800x600 pixels (212x159 millimeters) resolution:96x96 dots per inch depths (7):24, 1, 4, 8, 15, 16, 32 root window id:0x102 depth of root window:24 planes number of colormaps:minimum 1, maximum 1 default colormap:0x20 default number of colormap cells:256 preallocated pixels:black 0, white 16777215 OpenOffice must get its screen information from somewhere else - its documents are displayed approximately 20% oversize. from lspci: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL AGP 2X (rev 27) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Device 8008 Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 255 Memory at d800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] I/O ports at c000 [size=256] Memory at da00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] [virtual] Expansion ROM at 2000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [50] AGP version 1.0 Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 2 Kernel modules: atyfb e...@lucid-eddy:~$ xrandr --verbose Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 default connected 800x600+0+0 (0x109) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x108 Timestamp: 1184102 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: 800x600 (0x109) 28.8MHz *current e...@lucid-eddy:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Reduced screen resolution choices after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420372] Re: OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
OK - I have just tried Lucid and discovered the promote - demote buttons which do it for me. Going back to my bug report - my (intuitive to me) method still doesn't work on Lucid. Going back to the original software version the results are the same - it does work now that I know how to work it! So there doesn't seem to be any significant difference between the two versions. The problem was my approach - and the fact that I am more at home with menus than with icons! Issue confirmed closed with just a tinge of embarrassment ... and a feature request that adding a bulleted list should always involve a demotion below any current bulleting level. -- OOo does not nest bullets with different formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532842] Re: gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
OK - did a bit of an experiment. Taking care to keep all windows within the screen boundary and a smaller target window - Next try - crashed again. Then thought - I hadn't actually clicked in the target window to make it current. Did so, then inadvertently did a full screen screen shot - which worked. Then tried again, set the targeet window as current, screen shot just the current window, it worked. So does the problem occur if there is not a current window defined? (eg when what was the current window has been closed) I'm really sorry but I'm having to get some work done, so I have to pass this one over for now. I'll come back later and move it on again if it is still here. -- gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532842] Re: gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
Oops - beta version. Forgot to say. Can't get to details at the moment but ask me later if necessary. -- gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532842] Re: gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
Screen shot target was current window. First try at a screen shot was unsatisfactory due transparency issues not visible on the original. The unwelcome shadows were from the screen shot dialogue which had overlapped the original window. Second try involved moving the target to the extreme bottom left, renaming the first try, then trying again with the screen shot dialogue fairly high up on the right hand side - then bingo - the crash. Environment was Dell Dimension 4700 with only 512k of RAM, live CD to test Ubuntu, not install it. I had three text documents (852 bytes, 14.7Kb and 35.4Kb) already on the desktop, and the first screen shot was 96.4k - as would the second have been. For what it's worth (and so as not to lose it, because I may have limited storage here) all this current desktop content is attached. The .tgz is another 100k on the desktop so it looks as though the problem is not one of available storage. ** Attachment added: "Desktop contents including (renamed) target window" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45210484/Ubuntu-10.4%20on%20Ld.tar.gz -- gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490176] Re: gvfs smb write file error: Success
>From 493359 - (duplicate sorry!) Ubuntu accessing a file on a Debian-Samba >share: I have seen this when a file is opened by two clients if one tries to update it while the other is still connected. After the initial problem is reported by OpenOffice a subsequent attempt to drag and drop after saving locally can give the error-success contradiction. I have also had occasional repair cycles when reopening OOo files hosted on my Debian-samba server which might have something to do with this issue... -- gvfs smb write file error: Success https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451164] Re: yelp
OK - if it happens again and I can remember I haven't seen it lately.Chris -- yelp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493359] Re: Unhelpful message when file is locked
** Attachment added: "Screenshot with Ubuntu version details" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36513024/SambaLocking.png -- Unhelpful message when file is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493359] [NEW] Unhelpful message when file is locked
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs I got an error report when saving a server-hosted OpenOffice file. I saved the file locally then tried to drag and drop the local file onto the samba share. The "error while copying" simply showed "success" in teh more details option. The file had not been saved onto the server. The file was also open on another client. When that client released the file the update was not applied automatically; it had to be dragged and dropped again. ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unhelpful message when file is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
** Attachment added: "tgz of info from 27Nov backup" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36269290/27Nov09.tar.gz -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
OK - but log.smbclient is 618.8 Mb.I have grep-ed it down to show that there is no match in the log for the file names that were not backed up. The upload includes the 200 lines preceding the occurrence of each file that was backed up from the directory in question. If 200 isn't enough I can easily extend it. Notes about the files in the tgz: pdrive-backup shows what most of the other files are (They all accumulate history - you are probably only interested in the tail ends of these) extractor is run to cut the log.smbclient down to size, and makes extracts. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Oops - I had forgotten there are two threads. The last upload belongs with 437944 - I have posted it there as well so this one can be deleted. I will run the backup with the same log level tomorrow (Friday) assuming I remember... but it really will be really big - there are a lot of files in the backup. Chris. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address
Attached Cheers Chris. ** Attachment added: "tgz of test as requested with logs" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36111942/26Nov09.tar.gz -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Attached. Cheers - and thanks. Chris ** Attachment added: "tgz of test run once with debug level 9 & both log files" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36110268/26Nov09.tar.gz -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475848] Re: Crash in pm.GetArchives()
Was this a one time problem? Yes. The problem appeared on accepting the first routine invitation to update. After collecting the evidence, System-Administration-Update Manager ran successfully with no user input other than default responses. I think there have been further routine updates. If so, they have been error free. Sorry to be vague but I have three different versions current in different places. Chris -- Crash in pm.GetArchives() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451164] Re: yelp
I was collecting screenshots for Gnome bug 556932 (q.v.) including Help- About Gnome and Help-About-Ubuntu details. Having successfully captured the shots I needed, on closing the windows I got a Yelp crash message from Apport which I duly tried to process And got the attached screen shot and crash dump. This has happened to me once before when collecting bug evidence - and very recently: -rw--- 1 cwsup cwsup 2849428 2009-11-01 18:16 _usr_bin_yelp.1000.crash That crash dump is no longer available, but it was associated with Ubuntu Launchpad bug 469116 Both times I was investigating what looks like data corruption in Gnome Sudoku on Ubuntu 9.10. ** Attachment added: "tgz of Apport error message and Yelp crash dump" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35332413/yelp-bug.tar.gz -- yelp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475848] Re: First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
Update Manager subsequently ran normally from the System-Administration menu. -- First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475848] Re: First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192928/Screenshot.png -- First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475848] Re: First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192870/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192871/XsessionErrors.txt -- First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475848] [NEW] First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager See attached screen shot. It looks as though the upgrade left some old incompatible packages in place. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 5 21:08:23 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: update-manager 1:0.126.6 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: update-manager Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 469116] Re: Error in Sudoku time keeping.
Why do you open a bug if you know it's a duplicate? Last time I had a similar error message I did not have the presence of mind to keep the 'elapsed time' message on screen. I just cleared the dialogue and went to Help - report a bug. I realised later that the collected information may have been deficient in something useful, like the source of the cleared error message. This time I ran ubuntu-bug (help is not available with the dialogue box open) while the error box was still live. Ubuntu-bug did not pick up the duplicate, and I did not want to lose any of the evidence - so I went along with it and opened the new bug. But I tried to do it helpfully If the evidence I have managed to collect is no more useful than that already available, then this bug can be closed as a duplicate with nothing to add. -- Error in Sudoku time keeping. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 469116] Re: Error in Sudoku time keeping.
** Attachment added: "55seconds.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34886832/55seconds.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34886833/Dependencies.txt -- Error in Sudoku time keeping. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 469116] [NEW] Error in Sudoku time keeping.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Dupe of 262315 - my route here did not recognise it. The attached data from ubuntu-bug relates to a reported 55 seconds to complete. This on Karmic recently updated (by invitation from update manager) from Jaunty. Version details on screenshot. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Nov 1 17:54:29 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-utils 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: gnome-utils Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1674): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1696): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1703): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Error in Sudoku time keeping. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282315] Re: Gnome-sudoku timings all wrong
Confirmed - still wrong in Karmic. I got 56 seconds reported total and elapsed times (both the same - that bit is as I expected) which is just not possible for the game with all the notes I made. See screenshot! ** Attachment added: "screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34794748/Screenshot.png -- Gnome-sudoku timings all wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282315 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103466] Re: sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished
And Jaunty, again after using clear track. ** Attachment added: "Jaunty.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33977891/Jaunty.png -- sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address
Sorry - I don't know. This is a new backup protocol following two bad experiences with tape mechanisms, so I have only been doing it for a couple of months, and only on this version. If there is still a gutsy box around at work I will try the test script on that next week. Chris -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103466] Re: sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished
On Hardy... It happened again - after using the track clear buttons a few times. ** Attachment added: "screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33760942/Screenshot.png -- sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address
Chuck - see the upload. The test script (called test) first uses the netbios name redirecting its output to the file ntserver3, then uses the IP address redirecting its output to file IP91.249. I ran it three times. The netbios calls all worked as I would expect, and as you can see on the file ntserver3. All three of the IP calls showed the same "access denied" error - see IP91.249. FYI and to help you to assess things, I also have a record of an isolated failed overnight backup. The problem with that sort of event is its unrepeatability, so it is not really suitable bugfix fodder. But interestingly (IMHO) the unrepeatable backup failure also included error messages similar to the access denied messages on the IP smbclient output; the very much longer path and file name "session request to" field was progressively curtailed over several successive reports. So within this reproducible issue are processes that were also present in my unrepeatable backup failure. If you wish to follow up on the backup failure I will go over the records and get more detail for you. Chris Chris -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Backup still showing the same problem of Access Denied. There is nothing in /var/log/samba. Smb.conf log level says it is for logging samba server errors, and I'm only using the client. Have I been looking at the wrong config file (I can't see one for smbclient) or is there a log file elsewhere I should be looking for. I can't see one. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Sorry for the delay - day job intruded. The server event log has nothing near the time in question, and nothing I can relate to Access Denied. No problem with /dev/sda size - except my geriatric amnesia. To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have the server name; name resolution must have been used. Debug level 3 set in client smb.conf but nothing found in /var/log/samba. I have restarted the client (sadly following an Ubuntu update that included a Samba security fix) and will recheck the backup and system logs when I go back in. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Assuming 'this' is the Access Denied issue... I will check the server event log in the morning. The backup concerned is multi-gigabyte and takes nearly five hours. Needless to say it runs overnight. I will run it tomorrow with debug level 3 assuming my aged memory cells remember after work tomorrow. I don't know from memory how many thousand files are involved, and the problem is on the W folders at the back end of the alphabet. If you have any suggestion about how big the level 3 log is per 1000 files it might help me to make sure there is enough disk space on the client. I might need to relocate the log file away from the crowded 20Gb system drive onto the large backup drive. But I'll try anyway if you can't get back. Chris PS If it is the smbclient -L bug, I now have a number for it, viz 437944. C -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437944] Re: Samba session request failure when using IP address
** Attachment added: "SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32542103/SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437944] [NEW] Samba session request failure when using IP address
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient -L consistently throws session request errors when addressing a Windows2003 server by its IP address. (spawned from Ubuntu bug - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 and attached screenshot for serve details) To check consistency I ran a test script three times. The script first uses the server name, then its IP address. The script with console output appended, and the two redirected output files are attached. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Samba session request failure when using IP address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
The smbclient -L test consistently gives an error message when addressing my server by its IP address. I will open this as a separate bug. To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have an entry for the server. Access by name used a name resolution service. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Oops - My screenshot shows that both TSC and OOo were using the server name. I have probably put HBS_NTserver3 in my hosts file... I will check that also. -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
I routinely use its IP address when accessing this server from my Ubuntu box. Windows, of course, uses DNS or netbios name resolution. I ran the smbclient -L test twice - once in each mode. I did this in a few spare moments at work, and have only just looked in detail at the results. The two results are interestingly different. If my memory cells hold out until Monday, I will run the test again to see whether the error messages on the IP-access try are repeatable, or whether they are the kind of ephemera that make bug-hunting difficult. Details are in the attachment. Chris ** Attachment added: "tar-gz of the test + console output; both result files." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32456478/accessdenied-bug.tar.gz -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] Re: Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing pretty well everything." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32379834/Screenshot-7.png -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436041] [NEW] Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient backup script reports access denied on all files in one folder of a large Server2003 share. Navigate to the offending MS Word file - no problem. Click to open it (with OOo 3.0) and get access denied. (Same message if I load writer and try file-open) School firewall prevents apport auto report. TSC shows NT permissions Same user account opens files without a problem on XP-pro Attempt to drag and drop the file onto the ubuntu desktop gets error while copying permission denied. No problems with XPpro Ubuntu 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129152] Re: cannot set number or name of workspaces from workspace switcher applet
Same bug back in Karmic alpha-5 default installation. -- cannot set number or name of workspaces from workspace switcher applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420372] Re: OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
Yes - on tonight's download of Karmic alpha-5. See screenshot of the result of trying to set level 1 numbered, and level 2 as bullets. ** Attachment added: "screenshot .png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31731821/Karmic.png -- OOo does not nest bullets with different formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420372] [NEW] OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Type text of document with numbered list. Edit one of the numbered entries to insert a level 2 bulleted list at the end of the entry. Try all ways to get the level one list numbered and the level 2 list bulleted Selecting the whole (outer) list changes level1 and level 2 to numbers. Ugh. Selecting just the inner list changes the outer list as well. Inexcusable. (Bullets have been problematical in OOo for a long time now - and whilst each bug might be considered small on its own, when put together they add up to a common, serious, adverse user experience problem. IMHO the whole of bulleting needs looking at from the design roots up rather than dealing with each little issue.) OOO300m15 (Build:9379) openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3, Tue Apr 14 03:12:12 UTC 2009 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic i686 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- OOo does not nest bullets with different formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420372] Re: OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
** Attachment added: "tar-gz of .odt and screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30926958/bullet-bug.tar.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30926959/Dependencies.txt -- OOo does not nest bullets with different formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223216] Re: evolution crashes when backup
Oops - sorry. Didn't realise I was on both systems. It all seems fine now - thanks for all you guys do. -- evolution crashes when backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405025] Re: Error recording start time
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29551882/Dependencies.txt -- Error recording start time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405025] [NEW] Error recording start time
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-games My problem was an excessively long reported time taken. The active time looked OK. I have added my report to the Gnome bug 556932 which mentions both types of timing errors. This report may be a duplicate of launchpad #282315 if the too long and too short timing errors really do come from the same bug - but comments on 556932 suggest they may be different problems. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: gnome-games 1:2.26.1-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-games Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 ** Affects: gnome-games (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Error recording start time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223216] Re: evolution crashes when backup
I tried it today at school on Jaunty - no problem seen. NB this is a different single email account. On my current (LTS) Hardy, if I backup choosing not to restart Evolution after the backup. the backup apparently does not happen, and on restart I get the "Evolution appears to have exited unexpectedly the last time" with Ignore and Recover options. This is an old copy of my various mail accounts, which I stopped using some time ago. If this issue with Hardy is not widely reproducible, let me know what I can do to help - but note there is still nothing in /var/crash For information my live email is on an unsupported Feisty system - which I will probably migrate over the summer to Jaunty. Chris -- evolution crashes when backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223216] Re: evolution crashes when backup
Apologies - I missed the preceding post. I have to either build a Jaunty bx or wait until I return to work... I should have the answer in a day or two. -- evolution crashes when backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
A newly downloaded image (Linux ubuntu 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux) has loaded the live image today without issue. The original problem was almost certainly a CD read issue, and the only useful input is the observation that the read checks failed, allowing a non-functional system to be loaded. The unreliability is not apparent on a CD written today, loaded today. Today is very much warmer than it was in April. Chris -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
I strongly suspect the CD reader. I have tried again tonight on the same hardware with CD No 1 used previously. Warm reboot from shutting down Windows came up alright on the live CD with both panels and all expected panel contents. A shutdown and cold boot also loaded OK. I ran a launchpad hardware test which should appear somewhere with my email account attached. There were two defects: - one - the default English keyboard is the US keyboard. I am in the UK. (A colleague who installed from the live CD ended up with a US keyboard and had to be shown how to correct it.) - the second - no sound. I don't know whether this is a characteristic of this Dell model. The welcoming chime was loud and clear when I returned the machine to Windows and my wife. I would recommend putting this bug report in suspense unless/until either: - someone else has a similar experience or - a bug is found in the read checking logic of the live boot in either case, with my wife's agreement I will do my best to make the hardware really flakey (ie let it cool right down) and see if there is a detectable difference between this original version and any update. Chris -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
I strongly suspect the CD reader. I have tried again tonight on the same hardware with CD No 1 used previously. Warm reboot from shutting down Windows came up alright on the live CD with both panels and all expected panel contents. A shutdown and cold boot also loaded OK. I ran a launchpad hardware test which should appear somewhere with my email account attached. There were two defects: - one - the default English keyboard is the US keyboard. I am in the UK. (A colleague who installed from the live CD ended up with a US keyboard and had to be shown how to correct it.) - the second - no sound. I don't know whether this is a characteristic of this Dell model. The welcoming chime was loud and clear when I returned the machine to Windows and my wife. I would recommend putting this bug report in suspense unless/until either: - someone else has a similar experience or - a bug is found in the read checking logic of the live boot in either case, with my wife's agreement I will do my best to make the hardware really flakey (ie let it cool right down) and see if there is a detectable difference between this original version and any update. Chris -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
CD fault confirmed - two CDs written on the same drive using media from the same close source both demonstrated unreliability - one consistently worse than the other. The read process is marginal. The same two media performed with consistent load times and no errors on other hardware. It may still be worth looking at the bug detail to see whether misreads have been accepted (checksum checks failing?) or error handling code has misbehaved. But such considerations are way out of my depth. -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366923] Re: nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type()
This hardware has an undetermined but confirmed hardware fault that affects transfers from the Linux live CD. It may affect other IO processes. The hardware is sufficiently robust to be running XP-home without any issues. The CD issues are described in greater detail in Bug#366344 -- nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366923] Re: nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973400/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973401/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973402/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "NetDevice.eth0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973403/NetDevice.eth0.txt ** Attachment added: "NetDevice.lo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973404/NetDevice.lo.txt ** Attachment added: "NetDevice.pan0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973405/NetDevice.pan0.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973406/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973407/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973408/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973409/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "Syslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973410/Syslog.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25973411/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- nm-connection-editor crashed with signal 7 in gtk_path_bar_get_type() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
COLD BOOT - disk error message on two out of two occasions, offering to retry which invariably succeeds. The first occasion was when the CD was first loaded. The second preparatory to doing the integrity check. REBOOT - always (6 times now) reads OK as far as I know, including the disk integrity check. I have to give this hardware back to my wife for now. If others experience the problem and I need to return to it it will be possible, but for now I'm off to my own hardware to see what that does. -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
Reboot - I got an X-server error (not visible) with an out-of-vertical synch static black band across the centre of the display. The body of the error message was not visible. There was a choice (Retry or Continue I think from memory) but the keyboard was not working properly ( I got another retry button and other screen corruptions but neither option was properly selectable, and Return didn't). Ctrl-Alt-Del got me into a reboot. On the third attempt the live CD booted properly and I got panels and menus on the GUI. I cannot exclude the possibility of CD reader faults - yet. I will do a check on the CD and report back.. -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366344] Re: gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939831/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939832/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939833/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939835/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939836/Registers.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- gnome-panel crashed with signal 7 in panel_shell_register() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359700] Re: Inaccurate nautilus bookmark Help docs
Your point accepted - and thanks for the action. User Help is a delicate area - any user problem is a prima facie case for improvement! I got to the wrong (File-Open) context by searching for Bookmarks and selecting the 'Introduction to the Desktop' entry. The search was prompted by the fact that I could not find how to manage my bookmarks. I am now able to do so, but only by the indirect route of opening the bookmarked item, then editing it or whatever from the Nautilus menu. If there is a more direct route that works on the Desktop Menu list it would be really useful to have it signposted in the System Help route. If there isn't, I can foresee problems for users who need to delete a newly dysfunctional bookmark to a removable or network target. The workaround of using a working bookmark to get to the edit menu will not necessarily be obvious to the target audience for the Help documentation.. Having said all this, somebody who knows the system better than I do is better placed to know what to do about it - if anything. -- Inaccurate nautilus bookmark Help docs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359700] [NEW] Inaccurate nautilus bookmark Help docs
Public bug reported: re Daily build today - 11Apr09 at 15:22 utc 9.04 development branch Features frozen, these are user guide comments re System-Help and Support 2.5.3.6. Adding and Removing Bookmarks: 1. To add the current location to the bookmarks list, press Add would be better as: To add the current open folder to the bookmarks list, press Add 2. or right-click a folder in the file list and choose Add to Bookmarks. just doesn't work - delete this. 3. You can add any folder that is listed in the current location by dragging it to the bookmarks list. You can't - delete this. re Nautilus Help 6.6.18.2. To Edit a Bookmark: 4. Choose Places ▸ Edit Bookmarks, isn't there - delete this and the following 'or'. Leave 'in a browser window,' 5. Is there any way of reducing the overlap and linking the two help systems? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Inaccurate nautilus bookmark Help docs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] Re: OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Agreed. FYI no further problems after removing Ooov3 at home but see below. OooV3 still in use at work on a similar box that has not exhibited the problem. (Job was too big to tackle in time slots available at work). The task was achieved at home by using a few greps on the csv then sorting and analysing the much smaller spreadsheets on v2.4. A few cycles of memtest revealed nothing, but no way of knowing whether it was the reboot or removing Ooov3 that stopped the activity. So all in all, evidence is inconclusive, closure agreed. -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] Re: OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Chris - FYI OOoV3 has enough advantages for me to have loaded it onto my work Hardy as well as at home. Now both machines are exhibiting instabilities - even without OOo running. They just hang or restart for no reason. Similar hardware - both running the same updates as they come out, so not independent problems. Can't get to grip with it so I'm reluctant to file a bug that might go nowhere. But the unofficial OOoV3 has to come off I'm afraid - at least for a while to establish whether it is implicated in the problem. All FYI only at the moment. Chris. -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] Re: OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Oops - it's getting late. Sorry. A 12 minute-ish loop. -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] Re: OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Turned back after sending the above just as my Hardy box went to sleep. A nudge of the mouse brought back everything except the calc window and its options dialogue. %CPU at 99 and TIME+ at 34: so it's been racing for some time. Came out at TIME+ = 35:36.xx It looks like pretty consistent 12 second-ish loop. -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] Re: OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Chris It is still happening after updating to the OOo-v3 I get with deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ubuntu hardy main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ubuntu hardy main added to my /etc/apt/sources.list. As a precaution I also upped my RAM to 1Gb. So I'm looking a bit more closely at how little I can do to see the problem. If I decline the offer to repair the document loads and eventually runs away. If I accept the offer to recover the document, but do not acknowledge the successful recovery by clicking 'Finish' it still runs away. soffice becomes active in the top list, and starts to tick up mill time. It seems that after about 5 seconds of TIME+ as shown by top, something happens and %CPU rockets up into the high nineties. X seems to keep running, the console window with top continues to refresh every 3 seconds, all windows can be moved around. But whilst the other windows repaint after being obscured, the OOo window with the invitation to 'click Finish' does not - unless I wait for a very long time. After waiting for this very long time (as long as it has taken to write this report so far on a different system using only one finger per hand because I never learned anything better in my youth) I now note that the OOo window has refreshed, and the %CPU mostly sitting below 1%. So I will now click Finish . I'm at 12:03.xx of TIME+ soffice comes to the top of top and the %CPU starts to rocket - then after a second or so it falls back. I do the edit - deleting the block of lines. It completes - %CPU at 7% then rockets again for a long long time. So I'll wait and watch. TIME+ = 16:16 still 98% Start playing Freecell on the same machine so that I'm there when it emerges. I wipe the freecell window over the soffice window so that I will see it refresh. TIME+ = 23:52 Card playing interrupted by soffice emerging from its loop. It looks as tough the loop takes about 12 minutes. My Calculate options - Iterations unticked, Steps greyed out 100, Minimum change 0.001. Look like defaults. Anything more I can do? -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318060] [NEW] OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I am processing a small weekend one day squid log file, renamed as .csv and imported into OOo2.4 with space as merged delineator. I have had recurrent difficulties and the file has subsequently been saved a couple of times in OOo2.4 native format, so by now it is a genuine if untypical OOo file. I am using calc to condense the file to identify unexpected 24/7 background squid activity. I now have an OOo file that consistently hogs CPU a short while after loading - even when I am not doing anything with it! It will be uploaded with screen shots and some information from my environment. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- OpenOffice hangs or freezes the system - Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
