[Bug 1617468] Re: Package contains files in /usr/@DATADIRNAME@/locale
Could someone provide the commands to merge the files into the share directory properly? I think it'll be something like: cd /usr sudo cp -r @DATADIRNAME@/* share But I'm not really an expert and I don't want to experiment. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617468 Title: Package contains files in /usr/@DATADIRNAME@/locale To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/1617468/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 758158] [NEW] package flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree installing ubuntu-restricted-extras, got this failure ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 11 08:33:11 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta amd64 (20110410) SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758158 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 758158] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758158 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.153.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 716111] Re: software-center crashed with GError in _get_icon(): Failed to load icon
I had the same crash trying to install Dropbox on a Natty AMD64 daily build from 2011-02-12 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716111 Title: software-center crashed with GError in _get_icon(): Failed to load icon -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634637] Re: [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager
I feel bad, it was just a simple wish list thing, and Andrew seemed to have had all the bases covered. He specified breaks and replaces arc- brave etc. Is it possible that conflicts should also have been specified? Or is it because the arc-* packages have been deleted from the repos? What happens now? If there's a further update to shiki-colors, can that make everything right again? -- [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634637] Re: [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager
Even now, do the arc-* packages still show as being installed on your system? -- [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634637] Re: [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager
I don't think that can be possible, the latest arc-* packages are 2.7-1ubuntu1 (and 2.7-1 in Debian) http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=arc-searchon=namessuite=allsection=all http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=arc-searchon=namessuite=allsection=all -- [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634637] Re: [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager
Wow, good catch. So to have 2.7-1ubuntu2 installed, you'd have to have installed Maverick before June 12? So, for my information, what happens when a package is deleted? Nothing deletes it from the user's machine? And what's the consequence for Jeremy's machine? Was it just a one-time error and from now on, he'll be ok? Would a good test be to get myself a Karmic, install shiki-* and arc-*, then upgrade to Lucid and then Maverick? Or is that unnecessary? -- [maverick] shiki-colors upgrade failed using update-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564769] Re: Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors
This morning I saw shiki-colors 4.6-1ubuntu2 in Maverick and all the changes seem to work great. Thanks -- Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238347] Re: All source file filter doesn't actually include all source files
This is working as designed. It's pretty much impossible for the SciTE people to keep track of all source types, this is designed to be fairly easily customized by the user. You change it as desired, based on the source types you use. -- All source file filter doesn't actually include all source files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226107] Re: scite tried to open netscape when running with a HTML file.
I would suggest that this can be considered working as designed. This can be customize by the user in html.properties, depending on what browser is used (or even GNOME or not). -- scite tried to open netscape when running with a HTML file. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564769] Re: Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors
Is this change planned for Maverick? (please say yes, please say yes, because I really hate the new default wallpaper, want the arc ones back) -- Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571132] Re: Facebook signup in foreign language
When I did the oauth thing for Twitter, the dialog came up in French. Is that related to this bug? -- Facebook signup in foreign language https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571132] Re: Facebook signup in foreign language
Omer, no it worked fine. Fortunately, even if you have no French, most English people could probably figure it out if they had to, but something completely different, like Arabic or Chinese? No way... :-) -- Facebook signup in foreign language https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629517] Re: Can't log in: required argument 'password' (pos 2) not found
To be clear, when you try to connect Ubuntu One to an existing Launchpad account, you click on the link at the bottom, and enter your account info, this is when you get this msg. So it's impossible to connect your existing account on a new install, importance is pretty high. I've entered all the info correctly, I think it's incorrectly looking at the new account info fields. -- Can't log in: required argument 'password' (pos 2) not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626252] Re: Rhythmbox crashes on startup
yes, it appears to be fixed, for me at least -- Rhythmbox crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626820] Re: rhythmbox will not start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 626252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626252 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 625912 [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 626252 Rhythmbox crashes on startup -- rhythmbox will not start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625912] Re: [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 626252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626252 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 626252 Rhythmbox crashes on startup -- [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624982] Re: rhythmbox crashes in three seconds after startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 626252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626252 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 625912 [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 626252 Rhythmbox crashes on startup -- rhythmbox crashes in three seconds after startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624982 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626820] Re: rhythmbox will not start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 625912 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 625912 [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start -- rhythmbox will not start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626318] Re: software-center crashed with DatabaseError in _database_gen_postlist_iter()
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. It's possible that it has been fixed already, because I tried it with yesterday's nightly build, and didn't have a problem. Or maybe I was doing it wrong. I had Software Centre up, installed gimp and gramps, no such problem (didn't even get the message about rebuilding catalogues). For now, I'll leave this 'new' -- software-center crashed with DatabaseError in _database_gen_postlist_iter() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626318] Re: software-center crashed with DatabaseError in _database_gen_postlist_iter()
Just noticed that you were actually using today's build (20100829), is that right? So perhaps it's a regression since yesterday... How repeatable is this, and do you sometimes get this error and sometimes the one from bug #626311? -- software-center crashed with DatabaseError in _database_gen_postlist_iter() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625912] Re: [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625912] Re: [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start
I reproduced this using this morning's Ubuntu Maverick build (20100828). Fresh install, startup Rhythmbox it comes up briefly then crashes -- [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625912] Re: [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start
** Attachment added: _usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/625912/+attachment/1525643/+files/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash -- [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625912] Re: [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start
BTW, clicking on the /var/crash/rhythmbox.1000.crash file says The problem cannot be reported: The program crashed on an assertion failure, but the message could not be retrieved. Apport does not support reporting these crashes. so don't know how much else I can reproduce for now... -- [Maverick] Rhythmbox fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625908] Re: Synaptic on Guest account will start from command line, but not System-Administration
Technically, this is working as designed, but gksu should issue a better error message, to the effect that the current user does not have authority to issue sudo commands ** Package changed: synaptic (Ubuntu) = gksu (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Synaptic on Guest account will start from command line, but not System-Administration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608382] Re: Maverick images build on lucid fail to boot - different syslinux version
technically, you don't even need to hit enter the second time (when the help options come up) -- Maverick images build on lucid fail to boot - different syslinux version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 626036] Re: windows 7 removes boot loader
As I understand, Colin Watson is looking for info on situations like this http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~cjwatson/blosxom/debian/2010-08-28-windows-applications-making-grub2-unbootable.html -- windows 7 removes boot loader https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433714] Re: initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account
Thing is, this is a GNOME problem, we need them to fix it first. That's what I'm trying to do, expedite getting a fix. I get the feeling, both from what Omer says and from looking at the GNOME bug, that the GNOME people think it's a fair bit of work. If I'm right in my analysis of the code, it's trivial. Whatever encouragement we can give to the GNOME people to verify what I found and get a fix out quick will be best for everyone. Then we figure out if it can be backported to Lucid. -- initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433714] Re: initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account
I thought I'd pass this by your technical people, I've just added this comment to GNOME bug 596086, which is the upstream bug for this one I'm sure it's a lot more complicated than I make it out to be, but it seems to me if you remove the strdiff for irc in account_assistant_chooser_enter_details_filter_func, won't that make empathy_protocol_chooser_set_visible display IRC in the Assistant? Maybe you can verify this in some way to add support for getting the fix in GNOME 2.32, and therefore into Maverick. -- initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433714] Re: initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account
The hyperlink goes to the Launchpad bug with the same number, I'm talking about this one https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596086 the code is here http://git.gnome.org/browse/empathy/tree/src/empathy-account-assistant.c -- initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619420] [NEW] shiki-* packages suggest the non-existent arc-* packages
Public bug reported: The shiki-colors package (Metacity themes) suggests arc-colors (backgrounds), which no longer exists. The same for all the individual packages, shiki-brave suggests arc-brave, etc. In /debian/control, each line that suggests an arc-* package should be removed. It can't be good to suggest a package that doesn't exist. This applies to Lucid and later, but should at least get fixed for Maverick. There is a separate bug 564769 requesting that the actual backgrounds from the arc- packages be included with the corresponding shiki-package. This seems like a good idea, as these backgrounds were very well done. ** Affects: shiki-colors-murrine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- shiki-* packages suggest the non-existent arc-* packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619420] Re: shiki-* packages suggest the non-existent arc-* packages
Maybe I should give more information for triaging... In Synaptic, in Lucid and later, look at the details for shiki-colors, you'll see it suggests arc-colors, but it's in italics because arc- colors doesn't exist. Same for shiki-blue, shiki-wine, each of them suggests a corresponding arc- package that no longer exists. While this doesn't seem to cause any problems, it doesn't seem right. The arc- packages were removed in Lucid because of the changes to GDM. -- shiki-* packages suggest the non-existent arc-* packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564769] Re: Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors
Currently, all the shiki-* packages in Lucid suggest the corresponding arc-* package (shiki-colors suggests arc-colors, shiki-brave-theme recommends arc-brave, etc) but of course the arc-* packages don't exist. So regardless whether the Arc-*.png wallpapers are eventually included in the shiki packages, the suggest should be removed. -- Please add backgrounds from arc-colors to shiki-colors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 456629] Re: Ubuntu One doesn't synchronize all files
Hi, not sure if you intended to send this just to me, or someone else, but either way, I don't know the status of this bug. Jeff On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:54 AM, papukaija jamisnaka...@gmail.comjamisnaka%2...@gmail.com wrote: Why is this bug marked as incomplete? -- Ubuntu One doesn't synchronize all files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456629 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. Status in “ubuntuone-client” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client Hi, My problem is that If i put a single file into Ubuntu One folder it usually works great (but sometimes it is not reacting), but if I put there folder that contains other files and other folders, it doesn't synchronize all of them. For example I put there folder that contains 5 other folders and 2 files, and it only put online 1 folder and one file. If it may help, todays I had also two .u1confilict files created. ProblemType: Bug .home.pumex..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log: .home.pumex..config.ubuntuone.ubuntuone.client.conf: [ubuntuone] connected = True connect = 0 show_applet = 0 bookmarked = True Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Oct 20 21:58:28 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: ubuntuone-client 1.0.2-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1702): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1702): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1766): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1760): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (nautilus:2205): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/456629/+subscribe -- In 2008, the world created 31 billion tonnes of CO2 and the level of CO2 in the atmosphere rose by 2 ppm, or 16 billion tonnes. Much of the remaining 14 billion tonnes went into making the oceans more acidic. We are changing our environment too quickly and we are now 12% over the safe threshold of 350 ppm. -- Ubuntu One doesn't synchronize all files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546364] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x21/0x30()
Public bug reported: I tried Guest Session, which worked fine, but returning to original user, got this crash. Same thing twice in a row, so at least somewhat repeatable. Using up-to-date (updated today) Lucid. Not sure if I should be reporting this under gdm-guest-session or kernel, but for now following apport's recommendation. It seems like a separate bug from any others that exist as it's specific to using the guest session. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help with problem determination and as always, thanks for the great work on Ubuntu. I *love* the way Lucid is turning out. ProblemType: KernelOops AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC268 Analog [ALC268 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC268 Analog [ALC268 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: jeff 1280 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0x7854 irq 16' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC268' Components : 'HDA:10ec0268,1025015b,00100101' Controls : 8 Simple ctrls : 5 Date: Wed Mar 24 16:21:58 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Failure: oops HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=028a966e-63d7-459b-b4cd-6b7027b9cc47 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100313.1) MachineType: Acer AOA110 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-17-generic 2.6.32-17.26 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-17-generic root=UUID=d2a44ca1-034d-4708-9990-6487ebeff70c ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Regression: Yes RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.33 Reproducible: Yes RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux TestedUpstream: No Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x21/0x30() Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 10/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: Acer dmi.bios.version: v0.3309 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.vendor: Acer dmi.board.version: Base Board Version dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacturer dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAcer:bvrv0.3309:bd10/06/2008:svnAcer:pnAOA110:pvr1:rvnAcer:rn:rvrBaseBoardVersion:cvnChassisManufacturer:ct1:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: AOA110 dmi.product.version: 1 dmi.sys.vendor: Acer ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 kernel-oops lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-potential -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x21/0x30() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546364] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x21/0x30()
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873224/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873225/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873226/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873227/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873228/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873229/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873230/IwConfig.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873231/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873232/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873233/OopsText.txt ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873234/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873235/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873236/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873237/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873238/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873239/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41873240/WifiSyslog.txt -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x21/0x30() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518566] Re: shiki theme issues a warning : option gradients is no longer supported
Yes it is fixed in this morning's update. Thanks so much for all your great work. -- shiki theme issues a warning : option gradients is no longer supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518566] Re: shiki theme issues a warning : option gradients is no longer supported
You probably already know this is the same problem as 518325 518433. -- shiki theme issues a warning : option gradients is no longer supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431059] Re: gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6
Now that this has been fixed in Debian, is there anything I need to do to get it into Lucid? Thanks -- gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432569] Re: Ubuntu One does not sync all files
I believe this bug affects me too. I have a folder in my Ubuntu One directory, none of which shows up on the web interface. I have no messages or specific info to add, unfortunately. I also realize this feature may not be working yet. -- Ubuntu One does not sync all files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431059] Re: gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6
I've been trying to be sure that everything will work with python2.6, so I figured out how to modify the package to require python2.6 instead on python2.5. Then I got this error: j...@ubuntu-karmic:~$ sudo dpkg -i gramps_3.1.2-1_all.deb Selecting previously deselected package gramps. (Reading database ... 110906 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gramps (from gramps_3.1.2-1_all.deb) ... Setting up gramps (3.1.2-1) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2190, in module main() File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2184, in main rv = action.run(global_options) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1496, in run self.options.exclude, byte_compile_default=True) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1092, in install self.default_runtime.byte_compile(self.private_files, bc_option, AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile' dpkg: error processing gramps (--install): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for shared-mime-info ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for gnome-icon-theme ... Errors were encountered while processing: gramps I'm learning all this as I go along, but I see postinst failed in pycentral, and I can see the offending code in pycentral: if byte_compile_default: if self.private_files: self.default_runtime.byte_compile(self.private_files, bc_option, exclude_regex, ignore_errors) That tells me that self.default_runtime is null, but I've changed PythonVersion in the control file to 2.6. I found a file called /usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py that says supported_versions includes only python2.4 and 2.5. So now, I don't know if this is a bug in pycentral (doubt it) or whether there is a replacement for pycentral with python2.6 (more likely) or whether this is related in some way to bug #353251 I don't know if pycentral is part of Python or what it is, so I can't proceed any further for now. -- gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432599] [NEW] Requesting Celestia 1.6.0 in Karmic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: celestia Hi, if this not the right way to make this request, please let me know, I'm new. I'd like to request Celestia 1.6.0 in Karmic. It seems to be quite a major update. Thanks for your patience, Jeff ** Affects: celestia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Requesting Celestia 1.6.0 in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431059] [NEW] gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gramps Hi, the summary pretty much says it all, I've checked with Benny (benny.maleng...@gmail.com) from the GRAMPS mailing list (gramps- b...@lists.sourceforge.net) who said: I believe gramps works fine with python 2.6, there is no reason for python-2.5 only, = 2.5 should be all needed (but 3.0 will not work obviously). You should notify the packager if there is an issue with the karmic package. There's also this page http://gramps- project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Python2.6 which seems to confirm that GRAMPS is just fine with 2.6. I think the package should require either python2.5 or python2.6 (but not 3.0). As it is currently, it requires python2.5 and python = 2.5. I don't know if this should go to the people at Debian, if so how should I proceed? I'm just a guy sitting in my living room so my apologies if I've done anything incorrectly. I can help you verify the fix if something is implemented. My eternal gratitude to everyone at Ubuntu, Jeff ** Affects: gramps (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gramps 3.1.2 in Karmic should allow python2.5 or python2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
