[Bug 1585614] Re: PHP Update on 2016-05-25 causes Apache not to restart, libm.so.6: symbol __strtold_nan, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
Rollback successful on all 12.04 servers to PHP build 5.3.10-1ubuntu3. Websites are again working. ** Description changed: This morning I applied the following updates to Ubuntu 12.04 webservers: The following packages are currently pending an upgrade: - apt 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 - apt-transport-https 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 - apt-utils 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 - libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - libapt-inst1.4 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 - libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 - php5-cli 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php5-common 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php5-curl 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php5-dev 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php5-gd 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php5-mysql 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 - php-pear 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + apt 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 + apt-transport-https 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 + apt-utils 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 + libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + libapt-inst1.4 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 + libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.27 + php5-cli 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php5-common 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php5-curl 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php5-dev 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php5-gd 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php5-mysql 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 + php-pear 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.23 Apache fails to restart, siting error: apache2: Syntax error on line 212 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php5.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: /lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libm.so.6: symbol __strtold_nan, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Into file /var/log/apache2/error.log Looks like I am trying to roll back all those php packages... Which I see several updates marked Security Update in the changelogs, thus checking the "security vulnerability" box as rolling back in this case is such. :-( ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585614 Title: PHP Update on 2016-05-25 causes Apache not to restart, libm.so.6: symbol __strtold_nan, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1585614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122 (Cross posting final solution here...) Michael Lueck (mlueck) wrote 9 hours ago: #39 I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3 and am pleased and relieved to see my test Windows XP client once again able to login to the Samba NT4 style domain. This update appears to resolve the defect I originally opened: [Bug 1574228] Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain Note: I did not make ANY changes to my configuration / settings. Only upgraded to this new build of the Samba packages. I am thankful, Michael -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication
I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3 and am pleased and relieved to see my test Windows XP client once again able to login to the Samba NT4 style domain. This update appears to resolve the defect I originally opened: [Bug 1574228] Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain Note: I did not make ANY changes to my configuration / settings. Only upgraded to this new build of the Samba packages. I am thankful, Michael -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122 Title: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122 @John #9, I had brought to my attention this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4.2_Features_added/changed New smb.conf options I make use of both OS/2 which has a LANServer client integrated, and the DOS LANManager client in order to connect to our Samba server for drive imaging. I was suspecting I need to investigate adding: client ipc min protocol allow dcerpc auth level connect options. If it really seems no smb.conf adjustments were required as part of applying this proposed update to the Samba packages I will hold off testing adjusting the smb.conf files for now. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122 @John #7, no we do not make use of the LDAP backend, thus did not spot the similarities with bug #1572122. I suspect this is not directly related to/not to the presence of an LDAP backend or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
** Attachment added: "Part of the smb.conf of one of the servers - complete other than the shares" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645345/+files/smb.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
** Attachment added: "Log of failed Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.25" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645175/+files/log.error.mdlxp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] [NEW] Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.04 fully patched, this weekend I attempted to apply the samba 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 updates. That resulted in a Samba NT4 PDC that downlevel Windows clients could no longer log in to. Logging into said Windows machines with a local account and manually issuing the NET USE command to bring up drive mounts to the Samba server were successful. I have taken log snapshots with Samba logging set to level 3 of a Windows XP virtual machine attempting to connect to the Samba PDC server. >From the working log I see: switch message SMBwriteX (pid 4906) conn 0xb82f9978 api_rpcTNP: rpc command: NETR_LOGONSAMLOGON schannel_fetch_session_key_tdb: restored schannel info key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/MDLXP schannel_store_session_key_tdb: stored schannel info with key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/MDLXP Forcing Primary Group to 'Domain Users' for mdlueck Whereas in the not working log I see at the same spot: switch message SMBwriteX (pid 21144) conn 0xb96f7200 srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer: failed Perhaps did Samba make a change that requires something to be specified in the smb.conf to accept connections from legacy clients? ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Diff of the two log files of the Window XP VM trying to connect" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228/+attachment/4645173/+files/SambaPDCWindowsXPClientConnectError.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain
** Attachment added: "Log of successful Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.3" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645174/+files/log.good.mdlxp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228 Title: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1280613] Re: Nvidia Optimus + bumblebee configuration not optimized by default
Supposedly there is a way to configure the NVidia drivers to force use of the NVidia chip always. Yes yes, that drains batteries more quickly. "I do not care." System76 knows the technique. I sent them an inquiry seeing that they offer a laptop with the NVidia Geforce GTX 970M or 980M chips. Their reply was they configure it without the need of Optimus + bumblebee to always use the NVidia chip. That tells me it is possible... "How, please?" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280613 Title: Nvidia Optimus + bumblebee configuration not optimized by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/the-bumblebee-project/+bug/1280613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533206] Re: Blueman-applet crash on login: DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out
Issue confirmed resolved in Xubuntu daily 20160408 amd64 ISO. Thank you so much! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533206 Title: Blueman-applet crash on login: DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueman/+bug/1533206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553609] Re: blueman-applet crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard. Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems which have no Bluetooth in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553609 Title: blueman-applet crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1553609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553609] Re: blueman-applet crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard. Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems which have no Bluetooth in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553609 Title: blueman-applet crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Failed to activate service 'org.bluez': timed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1553609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447038] Re: Shutdown/Restart of live session guest does not work in Virtualbox, KVM or VMWare
I used Xubuntu xenial-desktop-amd64.iso on 20160113 and in VirtualBox PLEU 5.0.12 r104815 and the installer still gets hung after it has ejected the ISO. I know it ejects as VirtualBox flips back from having the ISO mounted to the drive being empty. Should not it then get to some message about pressing any key to restart? Pressing keys did nothing to cause a restart of the VM. I used VirtualBox's hard reset and the VM boots up just fine. Does not look completely fixed to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447038 Title: Shutdown/Restart of live session guest does not work in Virtualbox, KVM or VMWare To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1447038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1526042] [NEW] WARNING Couldn't connect to accessibility bus Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus* starting sound-juicer
Public bug reported: Sound Juicer application will not start on my fully updated Xubuntu 14.04 x64 system today. I tried starting it from the terminal window, and see this error while doing so: $ sound-juicer ** (sound-juicer:18540): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-xQCoPAmspq: Connection refused I tried to run it as root via: $ sudo sound-juicer with similar results. I have removed the files /tmp/dbus-* including the root owned ones from the sudo attempt. This sounds similar to defect: "Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-*" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193236 Although all of those reported application issues have been resolved. Perhaps just Sound Juicer was overlooked? $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS Release:14.04 $ apt-cache policy sound-juicer sound-juicer: Installed: 3.5.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.5.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.5.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: sound-juicer 3.5.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-71.114-generic 3.13.11-ckt29 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-71-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Mon Dec 14 14:50:41 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-18 (1121 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120817.3) SourcePackage: sound-juicer UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-21 (602 days ago) ** Affects: sound-juicer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526042 Title: WARNING Couldn't connect to accessibility bus Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus* starting sound-juicer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-juicer/+bug/1526042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307546] Re: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf
I confirmed the proposed update in #16 on an Xubuntu i386 12.04 to 14.04 LTS upgrade just now. Works flawlessly. Thank you so much! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307546 Title: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1307546/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307546] Re: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf
I apologize, I find I have drained my supply of test systems with custom xorg.conf files. The rest of them are simple machines directly attached to their display, thus get by just fine without any xorg.conf file at all. The more complex configurations are at my desk where I make use of a KVM switch, thus require xorg.conf files as the system can not directly communicate with my display - the KVM switch blocks direct access. Someone else will need to test this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307546 Title: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1307546/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307546] Re: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Based on #16, I submit the same question as I asked in #14... Ready for me to test another 12.04 -- 14.04 LTS upgrade at this point? Please confirm and I will kick one off. Since it says Please test proposed package in #16, is there any special steps I need to perform when doing the LTS upgrade to insure I actually test the proposed package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307546 Title: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1307546/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307546] Re: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Based on #13, should I attempt another LTS upgrade to 14.04 with a system having Nvidia graphics to see if the xorg.conf no longer gets deleted? Just let me know, I have additional systems ready to test with and would be happy to validate the fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307546 Title: dist-upgrade from 12.04 - 14.04 axes /etc/X11/xorg.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/1307546/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309927] Re: LTS upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 deleted xorg.conf file completely
I had this same thing occur on my main desktop computer as well. Knowing that the xorg.conf file got trounced on my main notebook, I made sure I had a good backup of my xorg.conf file before beginning the LTS upgrade. At the conclusion of the upgrade, the xorg.conf file was still in the directory. Upon IPL, however, it was gone, and X started without the correct settings. I copied from my backup, IPL, and Xubuntu came up with the correct display settings. This desktop system transitioned up to driver package: nvidia-331 during the LTS upgrade. On this system I had already selected: nvidia- current-updates ... not sure if the notebook had the -updates version of the package, might have simply been current on that system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309927 Title: LTS upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 deleted xorg.conf file completely To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/1309927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309927] [NEW] LTS upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 deleted xorg.conf file completely
Public bug reported: I just completed the LTS upgrade of Xubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04. Upon rebooting, my notebook lost its dual display behavior of cloning the LCD to the external display. Researching, I found no /etc/X11/xorg.conf file in place. Fortunately I make backups as I need different configuration settings based on my exact hardware set up configuration. I merely copied the correct template back to xorg.conf, IPL, and the display is now working as expected in this hardware configuration. Aparently, conf files from Xubuntu 12.04 were still correct as I did not make any changes. The xorg.conf file was mistakenly removed during the LTS upgrade process. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309927 Title: LTS upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 deleted xorg.conf file completely To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/1309927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1281329] Re: Sync up 14.04 release with latest avaiable version from project
Any update available on getting the Ubuntu repository updated and in sync with the official stable release of SQL Ledger before the trusty deep freeze? Seems silly to release a LTS version without updating software to the latest available version from the developers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1281329 Title: Sync up 14.04 release with latest avaiable version from project To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sql-ledger/+bug/1281329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304808] Re: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working
I just reloaded the production drive in the test machine with the GA release of Xubuntu 14.04 x64 and find that the USB mouse is working as expected. I note the mention of nvidia drivers in #11. I had not added those what I found USB ports dead. I need to install those. I had opened a bug report about difficulties installing the nvidia drivers on this machine, here: Nvidia Optimus + bumblebee configuration not optimized by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280613 We shall see if that damages USB mouse support, if it actually works as well in the GA release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304808 Title: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1304808/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304808] Re: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working
I last loaded the test ThinkPad T540p with a Xubuntu 14.04 20140225 Beta 1 ISO. New HDD today, thus new Xubuntu ISO, and I cannot get the USB mouse to light up (optical mouse) in either USB port on each side of the unit. How can I help test to resolve this critical bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304808 Title: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1304808/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304808] Re: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working
I put the former drive back in. It appears to have only one kernel update older than current, and the USB mouse works fine. Packages on that drive are as follows: $ dpkg -l | grep linux- ii linux-firmware1.125 all Firmware for Linux kernel drivers ii linux-generic 3.13.0.12.16 amd64Complete Generic Linux kernel and headers ii linux-headers-3.13.0-12 3.13.0-12.32 all Header files related to Linux kernel version 3.13.0 ii linux-headers-3.13.0-12-generic 3.13.0-12.32 amd64Linux kernel headers for version 3.13.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-headers-generic 3.13.0.12.16 amd64Generic Linux kernel headers ii linux-image-3.13.0-12-generic 3.13.0-12.32 amd64Linux kernel image for version 3.13.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-extra-3.13.0-12-generic 3.13.0-12.32 amd64Linux kernel extra modules for version 3.13.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-generic 3.13.0.12.16 amd64Generic Linux kernel image ii linux-libc-dev:amd64 3.13.0-12.32 amd64Linux Kernel Headers for development ii linux-sound-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu4 all base package for ALSA and OSS sound systems $ uname -a Linux noah 3.13.0-12-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 21 17:45:10 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Are further details needed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304808 Title: All USB ports/devices randomly stop working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1304808/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1286638] [NEW] LTS upgrade removes needed dnscache-run package
Public bug reported: I was running through the LTS upgrade of our last production 10.04 server, upgrading finally to 12.04. I have run into a repeat issue with the do-release-upgrade LTS upgrade process. Our configuration calls for the use of DJBDNS rather than Bind or some other DNS implementation. Going through the LTS do-release-upgrade upgrade removes those DJBDNS related packages and substitutes resolvconf and also seems to be related to package ubuntu-minimal. Attached is the term.log of me correcting the misconfiguration of DJBDNS. The result is that DNS is no longer working after the LTS upgrade, until manual correction of the needed dnscache-run package. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: term.log correcting the package misconfiguration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286638/+attachment/4002765/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286638 Title: LTS upgrade removes needed dnscache-run package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1286638/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1281329] [NEW] Sync up 14.04 release with latest avaiable version from project
Public bug reported: I see that the package of sql-ledger in Ubuntu 14.04 is recently old. SQL Ledger project released an update five days ago. Please catch this before 14.04 releases stable. Thanks! http://www.sql-ledger.com/cgi- bin/nav.pl?page=misc/whatsnew.htmltitle=What%27s%20New Version DateChanges 3.0.6 Feb 12, 2014 changed import function to disregard extra fields in import file added encoding for names to email function added source check to reconciliation changed credit invoices to return items to inventory at last cost ** Affects: sql-ledger (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1281329 Title: Sync up 14.04 release with latest avaiable version from project To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sql-ledger/+bug/1281329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1280613] [NEW] Nvidia Optimus + bumblebee configuration not optimized by default
Public bug reported: Hardware configuration is a ThinkPad T540p with GeForce GT 730M. I understand that this graphics chip as some new fangled Nvidia Optimus technology involved. I began testing with Xubuntu 13.10 x64, then re-imaged the system with the Alpha build of Xubuntu 14.04 x64 of 20140214. I have had to do extensive hand editing to the configuration of selecting both nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates and the bumblebee packages in order to at least see the Nvidia driver active in the Nvidia Settings applet. I have been updating the modprobe configuration: /etc/modprobe.d/bumblebee.conf commenting out the exclusions for the 331 version driver I have updated the bumblebee configuration: /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf according to the example found here: http://elementaryforum.org/forum/support-assistance/how-to_aa/3996-nvidia-optimus-drivers-and-tools-installation#post3997 To get the NVIDIA Settings to show the board finally... I found this command here: Nvidia Optimus on Linux \ How to use Bumblebee. http://www.linux.org/threads/nvidia-optimus-on-linux.4415/ optirun -b none nvidia-settings -c :8 However starting an additional instance of the NVIDIA Settings applet via the Xubuntu menu system shows that instance not being able to detect the Nvidia drivers being loaded. So it seems that one must use the optirun command to start individual programs that the Nvidia drivers are requested to service the video for?! This makes absolutely no sense. Shortly I am seeking automatic configuration of the latest Nvidia binary drivers to be used 100% of the time. Even the old Envy Nvidia binary driver installer worked far more simply than dealing with this Nvidia Optimus technology. Needs improvement. ** Affects: the-bumblebee-project Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: the-bumblebee-project Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280613 Title: Nvidia Optimus + bumblebee configuration not optimized by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/the-bumblebee-project/+bug/1280613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510284] Re: Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a /boot partition behind existing ones
Back on 2010-02-28 I reported this issue resolved. Someone please ack and close. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284 Title: Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a /boot partition behind existing ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/510284/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279557] [NEW] Support ntfs partition type for brand new blank hard drives
Public bug reported: I have been advised that the ubiquity package is where this request should end up. Adding Linux to an existing hard drive with Windows / NTFS format already present magically adds a partition type of NTFS to the Use As pick list. Thus one can establish mount points for the copy of Windows already present on the drive. However it is not possible to pick NTFS when the partition is not pre- existing. Thus to restore a partition backed up with NTFS3G / ntfsclone, one cannot prepare those partitions and mount points during installation of Linux. This has been a challenges for quite many versions which have included NTFS3G and ntfsclone, as it has been fully possible to backup / restore Windows images using Linux... just not to be able to set the mount points during the Linux OS installation. Please lift this slight restriction, allowing blank drives to be loaded in a Dual-Boot configuration utilizing for the Windows half an NTFS3G / ntfsclone prepared image. If you can drop this into a daily, please let me know when that has been done and I will pull down an xubuntu daily image to test / verify. Thank you! :-) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279557 Title: Support ntfs partition type for brand new blank hard drives To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1279557/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540015] Re: X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is installed
This is logged against a now very old version. This problem in my mind is no longer valid. Please confirm and close this report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540015 Title: X Fails to start once VirtualBox Guest Additional Drivers is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-guest-additions/+bug/540015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 508988] Re: Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer boots, hang at mup.sys
Bug is not present in current versions of Ubuntu / Xubuntu. Old bug against no longer supported versions. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508988 Title: Installing Lucid Alpha 3 dual-boot, Windows 2000 SP4 NTFS partition no longer boots, hang at mup.sys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/508988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529654] Re: Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots
Marking Invalid since it was resolved a long time ago. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654 Title: Add Lucid Alpha 3 to a Win XP Pro SP3 system, XP no longer boots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/529654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510284] Re: Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a /boot partition behind existing ones
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284 Title: Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a /boot partition behind existing ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/510284/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176898] Re: Ubuntu Hardy / Jaunty system sounds and some other audio files are not properly played
Frankly I had given up on customizing the stock sound schemes. It was getting harder and harder to fight against the current and have custom sounds. I now operate in silence... no start-up sound at all. Last I recall, it was extremely hard to swap out one-off a particular sound to an alternate sound file and leave the rest of the sounds distro default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176898 Title: Ubuntu Hardy / Jaunty system sounds and some other audio files are not properly played To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/176898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063350] Re: curl corrupts floating point context
The #4 work-around solved this problem on an x86 based install of Xubuntu 12.04. Was there a security risk in that version of the package that the latest version was suppose to address? Aptitude is having a hard time locking in that specific back level version, thus thinks there is an update available all the time. What can I do to assist with resolving this bug? TIA! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063350 Title: curl corrupts floating point context To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycurl/+bug/1063350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645211] Re: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized
A while ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS to 12.04 LTS, and the USB HDD is properly attached automatically to a USB2 controller rather than USB 1.1. I no longer need the script posted in #23 to wake up the USB subsystem back to reality. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645211 Title: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed
@Phillip #9 Thank you for following up on this case. What ever partitioner the Ubuntu LiveCD GUI installer uses to partition the disk made a partition table which was incompatible with the latest BIOS available from Intel for the motherboard in this system. Placing the hard disk drive into a system with older Intel motherboard (also with latest available BIOS for that motherboard) would POST and boot properly. I have since migrated this troublesome system to Xubuntu 12.04, and that LiveCD installed BEAUTIFULLY on a brand new blank hard disk drive. So unless a different partitioner is used between the Ubuntu and Xubuntu LiveCD's, then this problem is resolved by the code in 12.04. In the case Ubuntu and Xubuntu use a different partitioner, then my success with Xubuntu 12.04 is irrelevant. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393672] Re: [xfce]Double click title bar actions use different speed than text selection
I adjusted the speed to 400 per suggestion here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2118805p=12540305#post12540305 Then came to report success. It appears I am not alone in this change request. Please get this one in, should be simple / safe enough, and well enough community tested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393672 Title: [xfce]Double click title bar actions use different speed than text selection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/393672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
@nobuto: Thank you for sharing your steps to success. The apt-get install step did the trick and did not complain about python-uno. I can confirm the resolution to the problem I originally reported. The relative font fatness in preview mode is seemingly identical to the font fatness in presentation mode. Without the patch and with hardware acceleration enabled, then the font puffs up fat in presentation mode. Thank you for resolving this trouble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
@nobuto: How did you get it to install on precise? I just attempted again and the instructions linked to from #68 for how to test a proposed package lead to an utter aptitude nightmare... wants to remove all sorts of packages for selecting the libreoffice/1:3.5.7-0ubuntu4 when starting it via sudo aptitude -t precise-proposed If I leave the switches off, then the best I can get is what I posted in #69. Would someone kindly assist so I may confirm my own bug resolved by the proposed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
Greetings Steve, This evening I attempted to get it tested on my Xubuntu 12.04 x64 system. I ran into a snag. I suspect what Aptitude was telling me is that the package python-uno needs to also be updated and was not provided. Following is a text screen dump of the dependency tangle. I had only left all of the libreoffice* packages enabled to be upgraded to the test release. Please advise how I should proceed in this case. Sincerely, Michael Actions Undo Package Resolver Search Options Views Help C-T: Menu ?: Help q: Quit u: Update g: Download/Install/Remove Pkgs Packages Preview aptitude 0.6.6 #Broken: 3 Will use 128 kB of disk space DL Size: 90.2 MB ilinux-image-generic 3.2.0.36.433.2.0.37.44 ilinux-libc-dev 3.2.0-36.573.2.0-37.58 inetwork-manager-gnome 0.9.4.1-0ubunt 0.9.4.1-0ubunt invidia-current-updates 304.43-0ubuntu 304.64-0ubuntu iplymouth 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 iplymouth-label 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 iplymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 0.8.2-2ubuntu3 ipython-aptdaemon 0.43+bzr805-0u 0.43+bzr805-0u ipython-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets 0.43+bzr805-0u 0.43+bzr805-0u iBA python-uno 1:3.5.4-0ubunt 1:3.5.7-0ubunt irsyslog 5.8.6-1ubuntu8 5.8.6-1ubuntu8 itransmission-common 2.51-0ubuntu1. 2.51-0ubuntu1. itransmission-gtk 2.51-0ubuntu1. 2.51-0ubuntu1. i A uno-libs3 3.5.4-0ubuntu1 3.5.7-0ubuntu4 i A ure 3.5.4-0ubuntu1 3.5.7-0ubuntu4 iusb-creator-common 0.2.38 0.2.38.1 iusb-creator-gtk 0.2.38 0.2.38.1 ixfce4-settings 4.8.3-1ubuntu3 4.8.3-1ubuntu3 ixkb-data 2.5-1ubuntu1.3 2.5-1ubuntu1.4 Python-UNO bridge Some dependencies of python-uno are not satisfied: ▒ ▒ ▒ * python-uno depends on libreoffice-core (= 1:3.5.4-0ubuntu1.1) ▒ ▒ [1(1)/...] Suggest 258 removals e: Examine !: Apply .: Next ,: Previous -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600603] Re: Skyrocket screen saver failing to start, screen dims, then pops back to 100% normal brightness
I was able to reproduce these odd behaviors with Xubuntu 12.04 x64. Therefor it is probably not something Gnome specific as it happens with Xcfe as well. I have not installed Virtual Box on this system yet. So that rules out all VM involvement. I did a bit of research. These rss-glx screen savers seem to come from Terence Welsh / Really Slick. I have contacted him directly, referencing this support thread. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600603 Title: Skyrocket screen saver failing to start, screen dims, then pops back to 100% normal brightness To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rss-glx/+bug/600603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed
I was able to load a blank hard drive successfully in this same system with XUbuntu 12.04.1 x64 edition. I did not have to partition the drive with Ubuntu 9.04 like I had to when loading 10.04 LTS. I suppose it to be a bug in the specified editions of Linux around the time of release of 10.04 LTS. Fortunately it seems to have been corrected in the next LTS release of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-fdisk/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645211] Re: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized
@Ubuntu, I replied to your latest update, and along comes janitor and expires the bug report. Reopening hopefully. This is still an issue with the latest 10.04.4 x86 build. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645211 Title: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645211] Re: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized
@Christopher, I do not have capabilities to test the latest Ubuntu on our production servers. I will not be upgrading production servers until well after 12.04 LTS releases stable. As indicated in this dupe report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625134 Upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 resolved the problem for the OP, per post #3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/625134/comments/3 So already it was corrected in the 10.10 kernel tree. What ever the fix is it has never been identified and merged into the 10.04 LTS kernel tree. Could you please put this bug report back to Confirmed against the 10.04 LTS version tree? If there is a 10.04 LTS kernel build already prepared that I should test, please indicate so in a reply. I have tested other 10.04 kernel fixes already and the fixes have been distributed to production machines... so I am aware of how to do so. I recall different instructions in that case than KernelMainlineBuilds, however. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645211 Title: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 654300] Re: cron.daily reports apticron RTNETLINK answers: Address family not supported by protocol
@Vibhav, I have not seen an update to apticron distribute, nor do I see at http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/a/apticron/apticron_1.1.20/changelog an update newer than the version we already have installed. How is it then that you changed the status to Fix Released? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654300 Title: cron.daily reports apticron RTNETLINK answers: Address family not supported by protocol To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apticron/+bug/654300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645211] Re: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized
FYI, this is still an issue with the current 10.04 LTS x86 PAE kernel build. Linux ldslnx01 2.6.32-40-generic-pae #87-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 5 21:44:34 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux I still must run my fixext_backup.sh script to get the USB HDD to attach via the USB 2.0 controller. Any suggestions what is still broken in the 10.04 kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645211 Title: USB HDD and Flash Drives no longer recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
My LI installation just updated running Lucid 10.04. Now I have: LibreOffice 3.4.5 OOO340m1 (Build:502) This bug is still present in this build. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
@Christopher, ??? I am on Ubuntu Linux 10.04 x64, not Vista. Gee that is great that it is unreproducible with Vista. Meanwhile I have switched my machines all to LibreOffice via the PPA instructions found here: http://www.ubuntugeek.com/install-libreoffice-in-ubuntu-11-0410-1010-04-using-ppa.html Yes I still needed to disable the acceleration to not have the font go fuzzy with LibreOffice. Please advise how I may assist in this matter. Thank you! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507499] Re: All created pdf file have the same name
My system is currently running with package: 2011-10-11 04:10 cups- pdf_2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1_amd64.deb I do not see unique filenames in the created PDF's. I changed my configuration per the OP's suggestion and now at least get the job number in the PDF filename. Therefor I can not confirm what ever fix was suppose to have been sent out back on the 7th of this month. Please help me understand what is going on with this bug report / fix. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507499 Title: All created pdf file have the same name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-pdf/+bug/507499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507499] Re: All created pdf file have the same name
Greetings Martin-Éric, Per the bug title All created pdf file have the same name... I thought fixed would mean that jobs now are given unique names. Thank you for clarifying what actually was fixed. I was expecting something unique in the filename such as the job number. I thought I was seeing the document title all along... printing several documents from the same program would end up trouncing files silently. I will continue to manually configure cups-pdf per the OP's suggestion: TitlePref 1 as that is the most useful configuration in my case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507499 Title: All created pdf file have the same name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-pdf/+bug/507499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507499] Re: All created pdf file have the same name
I just finally upgraded to 10.04.3 x64 edition a few weeks ago. I had forgotten what I did to generate unique filenames in PDF files. The default behavior is to still not put the job number in the filename. I finally found this old bug report. Appears the fix has been already distributed. Since I am not seeing unique filenames (at least I do not think so as I do not see the job number in the filenames) then what fix was intended? TIA! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507499 Title: All created pdf file have the same name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-pdf/+bug/507499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed
An associate I work with was able to correctly identify the trouble with loads of Lucid, Oneiric, and the latest Debian. Turns out there is a HDD geometry incompatibility with these newer distros. The work-around that masked the situation was to partition the blank drive with Ubuntu 9.04, then reboot to 10.04.3, specify the mount points for the existing partitions, and thus arrive at success. In my mind, it is absolutely unacceptable for a modern Linux distro to mess up the HDD geometry / partitioning such that at system will no longer POST properly! I ended up RMA'ing a perfectly good / new HDD back to the manufacturer!! Not cool!!! :-| Reclassifying this report against fdisk and not grub2. ** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) = gnu-fdisk (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed + Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-fdisk/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed
The HDD BIOS settings in my computer are as follows: ATA/IDE ModeNative (can not change this) Configure SATA As AHCI S.M.A.R.T. Enabled SATA 1 - 4 They just autodetect - can not even arrow to these, cursor position skips over them Hard Disk Pre-Delay 0 In order to be able to change the ATA/IDE Mode, I needed to adjust the AHCI mode down to IDE, then I am able to adjust the ATA/IDE Mode setting and select between Native and Legacy. None of the settings allow for manual adjustment of the drive geometry settings. All possible modes the BIOS support always force auto-detect of the geometry details. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid, Oneiric, and Debian 6.0.3 prevent system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnu-fdisk/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed
I was able to clean load 10.04.3 x64 from the LiveCD onto my machine, as usual no POST once loaded. Then I took the drive to the P4/945 based system, installed Lilo, got that configured. I needed to update /etc/fstab back to using /dev devices and not referring to partitions by their UUID. Then it still wanted to put Lilo on the partition, not on the drive. So hand tweaked /etc/lilo.conf just a bit, and was successful with Lilo. Next I purged off the two Grub packages. Finally I took the drive back to my computer... and still will not POST with the 10.04 drive in it. So I guess Grub2 is really not to blame. What else could it be, though? Any suggestions of what to try next? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed
I tried pulling down the alternate 10.04.3 ISO and installed from that, hoping to select Lilo rather than Grub2. No question was presented, Grub2 was installed, box will not IPL. How is it possible to select Lilo rather than Grub2? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed
For another opinion I pulled down a copy of: debian-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso and installed a GUI desktop machine with that. Same thing, system will not POST with an installation having been done to the HDD. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed
I am able to reproduce the same results when installing on the same system the latest Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) x64 from the Desktop / LiveCD. Updating bug description with the second release name. Back to trusty Ubuntu 9.04 for the moment I guess. (shrug) ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed + Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid and Oneiric prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] Re: Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed
Cross linking with UbuntuForums thread on the same topic... http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1856283 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874698] [NEW] Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed
Public bug reported: My trusty main Linux machine, still loaded with Ubuntu 9.04 x86. Intel DG33BUC motherboard, latest BIOS rev Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 So to upgrade, I purchased a new drive: Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 0F10383 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5 Internal Hard Drive BIOS saw the drive fine, Ubuntu 10.04.3 x64 boots / installed smoothly Eject the CD, reboot, system WILL NOT POST! I see the nVidia BIOS screen, then blacks out, loan cursor at the top of the screen, FDD light stuck on. The cursor is at the top of the screen in that position PRIOR to the Intel splash screen coming on. Thus I know that POST has been halted. Switch drives back to the 9.04 drive, system boots fine. Switch back, same symptoms. Same thing with Ubuntu 10.04.3 x86. Using another computer with Intel D945GNTL MB and Intel P4 631 CPU boots Lucid perfectly fine as installed on the DG33BUC system. So using that system, a disk erase / wipe utility to begin erasing the drive, and THEN the DG33BUC will POST again with the drive installed in it. What does Ubuntu 10.04.3 both x86 and x64 do that is so nasty so as to prevent POST in an Intel DG33BUC based system? ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698 Title: Ubuntu Lucid prevents system POST once installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/874698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486443] Re: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking
I tried following your steps to install LibreOffice on a recently loaded 10.04 system. I wanted to install the entire suite, not just writer so I tried selecting libreoffice in Aptitude. That results in the following error: libreoffice: Depends: libreoffice-core but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-writer but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-calc but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-impress but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-draw but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-math but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-base but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-report-builder-bin but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-filter-mobiledev but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-java-common but it is not going to be installed This is after it comes up with an additional changes dialog stating that OpenOffice related packages will be removed. So, that must not be complete steps to transition form OO to LO. Could you please elaborate further? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486443 Title: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/486443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486443] Re: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking
Never mind about the install problems, others please find the instructions here: Install libreoffice in ubuntu 11.04/10.10/10.04 using PPA http://www.ubuntugeek.com/install-libreoffice-in-ubuntu-11-0410-1010-04-using-ppa.html Off to testing the existing OO bugs I know of... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486443 Title: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/486443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
@Björn Michaelsen I migrated a 10.04 Lucid machine over to LibraOffice this evening. The behavior is identical to that of OpenOffice. Bug remains. I am not sure what you intended me to do about this bug since it persists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: [Upstream] Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/585910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486443] Re: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking
This bug was originally for me: Lucid Impress crashes when opening a file located on a Samba smbfs mount Bug #586438 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586438 I removed the nobrl option from my mount commands I logged off all mounts / logged back on I can open files on the Samba server successfully, I can SaveAs creating new copies of files, and I can successfully open the new copies. I think this one is confirmed fixed with 10.04 Lucid and LibraOffice installed via the instructions in #18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486443 Title: [upstream] Can not save files to NAS cifs - needs nobrl or disable locking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/486443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313792] Re: VNC protocol greyed out in Terminal Server
@Jeremy #5: It is NOT an update which solved this problem, it is the addition of a package which was not in the suggested list in the tsclient package. IT SHOULD BE LISTED AS A SUGGESTION! Otherwise people have no way of knowing why tsclient has the VNC protocol grayed out. Marking back to Confirmed. ** Changed in: tsclient (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313792 Title: VNC protocol greyed out in Terminal Server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tsclient/+bug/313792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313792] Re: VNC protocol greyed out in Terminal Server
Thank you for the addl explanation. I am contently running 10.04 LTS. I liked tsclient as it did not waste screen real estate when connecting to remote systems. Vinagre wastes a bit more space, but has the C-A-D capability which comes in handy on Windows hosts. I use them both. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313792 Title: VNC protocol greyed out in Terminal Server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tsclient/+bug/313792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Thanks, I flushed out the previous PPA's and added that one. I see it now. The samba package depends on: * samba depends on libwbclient0 (= 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1) Which libwbclient0 is not on our servers. Did you build your package some other way than the official Ubuntu 10.04 ones? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
All right, I got the dependencies happy finally. Pulled down the following packages: libpam-smbpass_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb samba-common_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_all.deb samba-common-bin_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb libwbclient0_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb I then booted up a WinXP machine, started Windows Explorer \ Printers and Faxes on our Samba server \ properties of the three LJ4000 drivers. As usual, the Envelope Feeder check box will not stay checked on the PCL 5e and PCL 6 drivers. I check the box and the Apply button does not un-gray ack'ing that a change has been made which is possible to Apply / Save. Do you think the uploaded drivers might have been corrupted by the former Samba build? Shall I go through the purge Point-n-Print drivers process and re-upload them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Thanks, I flushed out the previous PPA's and added that one. I see it now. The samba package depends on: * samba depends on libwbclient0 (= 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1) Which libwbclient0 is not on our servers. Did you build your package some other way than the official Ubuntu 10.04 ones? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
All right, I got the dependencies happy finally. Pulled down the following packages: libpam-smbpass_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb samba-common_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_all.deb samba-common-bin_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb libwbclient0_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb I then booted up a WinXP machine, started Windows Explorer \ Printers and Faxes on our Samba server \ properties of the three LJ4000 drivers. As usual, the Envelope Feeder check box will not stay checked on the PCL 5e and PCL 6 drivers. I check the box and the Apply button does not un-gray ack'ing that a change has been made which is possible to Apply / Save. Do you think the uploaded drivers might have been corrupted by the former Samba build? Shall I go through the purge Point-n-Print drivers process and re-upload them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
I checked back this evening on this topic. Now I see Samba package files at the URL in #15. However Samba does not show up here: https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/mogile So not a surprise that I am not offered to move to that build of Samba. More assistance please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
I checked back this evening on this topic. Now I see Samba package files at the URL in #15. However Samba does not show up here: https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/mogile So not a surprise that I am not offered to move to that build of Samba. More assistance please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
I had to do: $ sudo apt-get install python-software-properties To be able to use the add-apt-repository command listed in #12. That done, refreshed the package list several times, and am not finding your updated Samba build you posted for me to test with. I will keep clawing at the keyboard... Open to suggestions. Thanks! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
FYI, I see no Samba packages under here: http://ppa.launchpad.net/clint-fewbar/fixes/ubuntu/pool/main/ That just might be a problem... Chuck, could you please check on the build machine? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
I had to do: $ sudo apt-get install python-software-properties To be able to use the add-apt-repository command listed in #12. That done, refreshed the package list several times, and am not finding your updated Samba build you posted for me to test with. I will keep clawing at the keyboard... Open to suggestions. Thanks! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
FYI, I see no Samba packages under here: http://ppa.launchpad.net/clint-fewbar/fixes/ubuntu/pool/main/ That just might be a problem... Chuck, could you please check on the build machine? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/709188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659738] Re: Duplicate welcome message in motd (caused by postinst script creating motd.tail file)
How's progress getting this fixed in stable distribution? I just had to sudo rm /etc/motd.tail on Lucid servers again. So I guess doing so is not a one time manual fix. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659738 Title: Duplicate welcome message in motd (caused by postinst script creating motd.tail file) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/659738/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518393] Re: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created
Evidently status = Incomplete also has an annoying 60 day timer... gggrrr... reopening and set to new. ** Changed in: djbdns (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518393 Title: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Aaakkk!!! @Till Kamppeter I updated this report a couple of times. Resetting the Samba ticket back to new as I feel the addl testing done confirms it to be a Samba bug and not CUPS. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Suggestion noted how to handle responding to a developer question. I had no idea that Incomplete had a timer ticking. BTW: Is there a best place to install Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) packages of Samba higher than the stable release maintained for Lucid? Perhaps this is fixed by a higher release of Samba. In the past when I started with Samba I was using Debian Sarge. I installed Samba from the official Samba repo. However, I have only used official Ubuntu packages since switching to Ubuntu. Thus since switching to Ubuntu I sort of feel out of the loop with what developments Samba has brewing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Aaakkk!!! @Till Kamppeter I updated this report a couple of times. Resetting the Samba ticket back to new as I feel the addl testing done confirms it to be a Samba bug and not CUPS. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Suggestion noted how to handle responding to a developer question. I had no idea that Incomplete had a timer ticking. BTW: Is there a best place to install Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) packages of Samba higher than the stable release maintained for Lucid? Perhaps this is fixed by a higher release of Samba. In the past when I started with Samba I was using Debian Sarge. I installed Samba from the official Samba repo. However, I have only used official Ubuntu packages since switching to Ubuntu. Thus since switching to Ubuntu I sort of feel out of the loop with what developments Samba has brewing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517833] Re: Add djbdns setup / configuration docs to the Ubuntu Server Guide
'twas so long ago I forgot I opened this bug report! I ended up writing my own docs here: HOW-TO: Basic installation of Daniel J. Bernstein's djbdns (TinyDNS) on Ubuntu Linux http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/HOW-TO_Basic_installation_of_Daniel_J_Bernstein_djbdns_TinyDNS_on_Ubuntu_Linux HOW-TO: Basic installation of Dynamic DNS update from DHCP for Daniel J. Bernstein's djbdns (TinyDNS) on Ubuntu Linux http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/HOW-TO_Basic_installation_of_Dynamic_DNS_update_from_DHCP_for_Daniel_J_Bernstein_djbdns_TinyDNS_on_Ubuntu_Linux Feel free to harvest IP to go into the serverguide. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517833 Title: Add djbdns setup / configuration docs to the Ubuntu Server Guide -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659738] Re: Duplicate welcome message in motd after upgrade 10.0410.10
I am still on 10.04 LTS Lucid servers and I have been seeing this reported behavior for a couple of days. Evidently it does not only affect upgrades to 10.10. I see one comment about lucid-proposed, but at the top Lucid is not included in the affects list. Oh, #13 did not include the word Lucid... evidently the fix is forthcoming to Lucid. Excellent! Thus subscribe and wait... :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659738 Title: Duplicate welcome message in motd after upgrade 10.0410.10 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
On our server we tested this fix on, I disconnected the testing repository. This morning I was notified that linux-image-2.6.32-31 -generic-pae_2.6.32-31.61_i386.deb was available. I pulled down that build, IPL'ed, and performed a backup. The backup completed flawlessly. Next up, testing this same kernel build at a client site. Thank you so much for getting this fixed code into production! We really appreciate it! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
Checking in on this... Is there additional testing which needs to get done? Or is this code ready to release to Lucid stable? Is there an ETA as to when this update will be distributed to Lucid stable? Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
Today I installed kernel: linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic-pae_2.6.32-31.60_i386.deb To hopefully test the fix on Lucid. The backup went through 100%. That is a good thing. However I saw a few warnings when it was backing up the /etc directory. The backup command run was as following, then the full output of backing up /etc 20110321 15:29:07 Starting RUNcmd=/usr/sbin/xfsdump -e -F -f /mnt/ext_backup/ldslnx01/20110321/etc -s etc -L $STAMPetc -l 0 / 20110321 15:29:19 Ending RUNcmd=/usr/sbin/xfsdump -e -F -f /mnt/ext_backup/ldslnx01/20110321/etc -s etc -L $STAMPetc -l 0 / RC=0 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy /usr/sbin/xfsdump: version 3.0.4 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-threaded /usr/sbin/xfsdump: level 0 dump of ldslnx01:/ /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dump date: Mon Mar 21 15:29:07 2011 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: session id: 1bd12265-4478-41a3-b1b5-4e2d8e004f4d /usr/sbin/xfsdump: session label: etc /usr/sbin/xfsdump: ino map phase 1: constructing initial dump list /usr/sbin/xfsdump: ino map phase 2: skipping (no pruning necessary) /usr/sbin/xfsdump: ino map phase 3: skipping (only one dump stream) /usr/sbin/xfsdump: ino map construction complete /usr/sbin/xfsdump: estimated dump size: 6580992 bytes /usr/sbin/xfsdump: WARNING: no media label specified /usr/sbin/xfsdump: creating dump session media file 0 (media 0, file 0) /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dumping ino map /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dumping directories /usr/sbin/xfsdump: WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode 25166008 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode 25167014 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode 25176948 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode 25182342 /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dumping non-directory files /usr/sbin/xfsdump: ending media file /usr/sbin/xfsdump: media file size 3713504 bytes /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dump size (non-dir files) : 3081488 bytes /usr/sbin/xfsdump: dump complete: 12 seconds elapsed /usr/sbin/xfsdump: Dump Status: SUCCESS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
@Bill Nickless #33, thank you for your quick work in both verifying and taking a shot at updating the tags on this bug report. Hopefully soon these new Lucid kernels will be released, and this problem will fade into memories... :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
Greetings Martin, Thank you for this invitation. This morning I followed the step in the documentation you posted a link to. I do not see an updated kernel version queue up for installation. I suppose that is to be expected as I only have the -26 kernel installed. Manually looking through (in aptitude) I do see higher kernel versions. Which one should I chose to install as I am currently running: linux-image-2.6.32-26-generic-pae in the x86 architecture. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585910] Re: Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled
Christopher Penalver, it is encouraging to see progress on one of my bug reports. Thank YOU so much for your assistance on this report. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910 Title: Impress Font fuzzy in presentation mode when Use hardware acceleration enabled -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518393] Re: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created
Yes the tinydns component of djbdns needs that specific ID. Per DJB (the author) three ID's are needed for a basic installation of djbns. Johannes Hessellund pointed out that a fourth ID is needed for an optional step in the set up of djbdns, so I added that ID as well, and references the URL's to DJB's documentation where both are specified. I have documented my steps of the basic installation using the Ubuntu packages rather than compiling from source here: http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/HOW-TO_Basic_installation_of_Daniel_J_Bernstein_djbdns_TinyDNS_on_Ubuntu_Linux If not in the djbdns package, then in the dnscache-run package. Those are the only two packages I must add to a system in order to set up a basic djbdns implementation. (Yes, those two drag on dependencies as well.) Aaahhh, the binary that the Gtinydns ID is passed in as an arg to comes from the djbdns package, not the dnscache-run package. So yes, I would think at least the original three I proposed need to be added by djbdns. And the same is true for the axfrdns account, the binary that needs it also comes with djbdns and not a separate package. I just have never needed that one, aparently Johannes Hessellund has. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518393 Title: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
All right, I retested this via testing Samba Port based printing which I used until SpoolSS / Point-n-Print was not working properly in Samba, back in v 3.0.2 time frame. That works properly allowing the check boxes / selection to enable the Envelope Feeder option to be active. I was able to print a COM10 envelope from WordPerfect and it was pulled correctly from the Envelope Feeder. Port based printing is where you go to the ports tab of the printer properties, add a port, and fill in the UNC path to the printer resource on the Samba server. So I believe this is specifically a problem with storing the printer driver on the Samba server via Point-n-Print and printing via SpoolSS. That would also tie in with check boxes not staying checked as the idea behind Point-n-Print is for administrators to be able to publish printers and pre-configure the driver for use with that SPECIFIC printer and its capabilities. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
All right, I retested this via testing Samba Port based printing which I used until SpoolSS / Point-n-Print was not working properly in Samba, back in v 3.0.2 time frame. That works properly allowing the check boxes / selection to enable the Envelope Feeder option to be active. I was able to print a COM10 envelope from WordPerfect and it was pulled correctly from the Envelope Feeder. Port based printing is where you go to the ports tab of the printer properties, add a port, and fill in the UNC path to the printer resource on the Samba server. So I believe this is specifically a problem with storing the printer driver on the Samba server via Point-n-Print and printing via SpoolSS. That would also tie in with check boxes not staying checked as the idea behind Point-n-Print is for administrators to be able to publish printers and pre-configure the driver for use with that SPECIFIC printer and its capabilities. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518393] Re: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created
Confirmed that today's current 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) still has this issue. Could someone please review my patch and check it in. That would be appreciated! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518393 Title: Gtinydns id not created, but two other id's created -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
@Tim: The only application I know of which is able to comprehend the envelope feeder on the printer is WordPerfect which is a Windows application. We run Ubuntu Server edition on our servers, no GUI, no nothing! Yes my workstation runs Ubuntu Desktop edition (9.04 still as I have one application dependent on 9.04 code). Likewise I am printing directly to CUPS and having much better success. Print jobs from Firefox went to never-never land while print jobs from Thunderbird (2.x) would print. Since switching to direct to CUPS printing Firefox is able to print. However that was broken even when the server was running 9.04. I have since upgraded it to 10.04 LTS. And it is not only the envelope feeder which got killed by the upgrade form 9.04 - 10.04. I quote: The PCL 5e and PCL 6 drivers print COM10 envelopes on plain paper from the tray, and they do not even rotate the text 90'. So Samba MUST be doing more than merely spooling print data headed to CUPS. But it is coming from Windows... how much detail could Samba possibly figure out about the print job?!?! I would think Samba merely spools data to CUPS, but apparently not the case. One thing which I just realized, I have not tried to connect with Windows to the print queues on Samba without using the Point-n-Print uploaded drivers. I will try to work up a test environment to test that scenario. Specifically, still printing through Samba but not make use of the driver already uploaded to the server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
Thank you so much Stefan! I switched over 100% to Ubuntu with 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) and XFS has been very stable since then. (Other than 7.10 which was the worst release ever, and I never did get a 7.10 box to production state!) What about maverick (10.10) and also natty? Are these versions also affected? As I am sticking with the -26 kernel, none of my servers which run apticron are nagging me for a kernel update. I suppose -26 is too far back and that is the reason I do not get notified. Could someone please attach a comment to this bug report when the new kernel build which includes this fix actually gets distributed so that I may update our systems? Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709188] Re: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer
Aaahhh, excuse me, Chuck Short: How could this possibly be CUPS which is causing these problems? The workstations print to Samba, which in turn prints through CUPS. CUPS direct printing from Windows workstations works. CUPS does not get involved until the print job reaches the server, however we are having difficulty getting the driver to keep the appropriate option check boxes when using Samba for Point-n-Print, which CUPS has nothing to do with. So how could it NOT be Samba which is causing the trouble? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709188 Title: Samba in Lucid upgrade killed Envelope Feeder on HP LJ4000 printer -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
@Stefan #8, On our server which I first saw the crash on, only three out of the eight or so xfsdump backups regularly scheduled caused this crash. The others all backed up successfully. The dump I originally started this case with actually produced a partial backup size. The other two backup jobs resulted in 0 length dump files. Thus I decided to focus on the backup job which resulted in some size at all. I could boot from the -26 kernel build and get 100% success backing up. Reboot to the -27 kernel, xfsdump crashes. The crashing has persisted into the -28 kernel build. For now, -26 is where we must stay. Getting no responses here, I referenced this bug report with a note to the XFS developer list. Shortly some xfs chances were identified as being done for the -27 kernel, that one was suspected as having gotten overlooked when xfs code changes were merged into the Ubuntu Lucid code. The thread on the xfs developer list has fallen silent, and now progress has been made on this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
Thank you so much Dann! Please let me know if you would like me to install an updated kernel package, and from where, to confirm the fix for you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Title: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
