[Bug 1782716] Re: [drm:amdgpu_job_timedout [amdgpu]] *ERROR* ring gfx timeout
Seeing the same on Ubuntu 18.04.3 with the HWE kernel, 5.0.0-25-generic AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4 This appears to be tied in to the problems resuming the laptop from suspended (black screen, flashing cursor) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782716 Title: [drm:amdgpu_job_timedout [amdgpu]] *ERROR* ring gfx timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1782716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790652] Re: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1
I'm confused. Do you need verification or not? Cosmic is not specifically supported on our platform, and there are no plans at the moment to support non-LTS releases that I know of. I can certainly test this if needs be, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790652 Title: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1801475] [NEW] trace-summary appears to need a dependency on python-subnettree
Public bug reported: See upstream bug, a new version has been released which fixes this error: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858583 Current version of trace-summary in Bionic is 0.84-1. Upstream released 0.84-2 in July with the appropriate fix. Pulling in the update from upstream should presumably fix this. ** Affects: trace-summary (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801475 Title: trace-summary appears to need a dependency on python-subnettree To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/trace-summary/+bug/1801475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1788681] Re: changed exit code for 'dc' in Ubuntu Bionic
Fix has only been released for Cosmic. Given the package is basically non-functional on Bionic, is there a plan to backport the fix? There doesn't seem much point in keeping it in the repository otherwise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788681 Title: changed exit code for 'dc' in Ubuntu Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bc/+bug/1788681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790652] Re: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1
Patch submitted to netdev: https://marc.info/?l=linux- netdev=153695411427176=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790652 Title: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790652] Re: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1
I've been able to replicate the situation with a few different distributions. It seems to only occur with VMs. When I tried 4.18.7 on a bare metal instance, there was no problem. We believe we've isolated the kernel commit that is introducing the problem to 707e7e96602675beb5e09bb994195663da6eb56d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790652 Title: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790652] Re: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1
I haven't specifically seen that one, but I'll check in with both the Oracle Linux team and our Hypervisor team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790652 Title: Oracle cosmic image does not find broadcom network device in Shape VMStandard2.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1734395] [NEW] mkfs.ext4dev unrecognised file system
Public bug reported: This is probably a bit of a daft one, and it's not blocking me on anything, but I see this more as a UX bug. mkfs.ext4dev creates a file system that mount then can't mount, unless it is told explicitly that it is ext4. (on a side note, what is ext4dev? Can't seem to find a solid answer) $ sudo mkfs.ext4dev /dev/sdb mke2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) /dev/sdb contains a ext4 file system last mounted on Fri Nov 24 22:40:41 2017 Proceed anyway? (y,n) y Creating filesystem with 268435456 4k blocks and 67108864 inodes Filesystem UUID: d5dcc961-f34e-4f59-b0f5-f58ea75dc817 Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 2048, 23887872, 71663616, 78675968, 10240, 214990848 Allocating group tables: done Writing inode tables: done Creating journal (32768 blocks): done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done $ sudo mount /dev/sdb mount mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext4dev' $ sudo mount -t ext4 mount $ /dev/sdb on /home/ubuntu/mount type ext4 (rw,relatime,data=ordered) doing a normal mkfs.ext4 works perfectly fine, as you'd expect. Version: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: e2fsprogs 1.42.13-1ubuntu1 ** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734395 Title: mkfs.ext4dev unrecognised file system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1734395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
That would be a different bug, unfortunately. Mine was specifically down to ipconfig not handling multiple network interfaces correctly, triaged and successfully fixed by Canonical, and exhaustively validated in our infrastructure. Roughly speaking, it would quickly loop through the interfaces sending out DHCP requests, and then listen on all for the responses, but it was only able to track the request for one interface, which was whatever the last interface it sent the request out of. There's a session id associated with it, and if that didn't match it would drop the packets. Booting became dependent on the order of network interfaces returned by the kernel, something that isn't guaranteed in any way, and explains why it was working with some kernels and not with others, as it would only work if the one interface that got DHCP responses was the last one returned by the kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Note: I've also discovered (unsurprisingly, I guess?) that I see the exact same behaviour on Ubuntu 14.04. Can this fix be backported? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I've tested and confirmed that this solves the issue on 16.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Given this is a fundamental bug in klibc, is there a plan to try to upstream this patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I took a step back from doing bisecting and focussed on creating a replication scenario, which I've done successfully. ipconfig is struggling to handle things when two interfaces are present and sending out DHCP requests, even if one interface doesn't get a response. Here's what I've done: Using virt-manager I created a bridge, bridge1, with no IP range associated with it (I want dnsmasq on a host to handle IP). I created a second, bridge2, likewise with no IP range associated with it ready for later use. $$$ I created an instance, named primary, with two NICs, one doing the usual NAT stuff so it has internet access. One hooked up to bridge1. I gave it two storage devices, 1 (sda) at 15Gb in size to act as local storage, 1 (sdb) 40Gb in size to be hosted over iSCSI (in hindsight, no reason for it not to be 15Gb too). Install Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS on the primary instance, pretty much following through with defaults, but leaving the second hard drive unused. Reboot and bring up the instance. In my case I end up with ens3 being the NATing interface, ens9 being hooked up to the bridge interface. ## sudo apt update sudo apt upgrade ## Add to /etc/network/interfaces: auto ens9 iface ens9 inet static address 192.168.0.1/24 ## Then: sudo apt install open-iscsi targetcli dnsmasq ## dnsmasq config: log-queries log-dhcp interface=ens9 dhcp-range=192.168.0.50,192.168.0.150,12h dhcp-boot=script.ipxe enable-tftp tftp-root=/tftpd tftp-no-fail ## Then run targetcli and do the following commands: backstores/iblock create uefi /dev/sdb /iscsi create iqn.2015-02.oracle.boot:uefi cd iqn.2015-02.oracle.boot:uefi/tpg1 luns/ create /backstores/block/uefi portals/ create 0.0.0.0 set attribute authentication=0 demo_mode_write_protect=0 generate_node_acls=1 cache_dynamic_acls=1 exit ## sudo mkdir /tftpd sudo chown dnsmasq: /tftpd ## /tftpd/script.ipxe: #!ipxe set initiator-iqn iqn.2015-02.oracle.boot:uefi sanboot iscsi:192.168.0.1iqn.2015-02.oracle.boot:uefi ## This gets the host pretty much ready to be an iscsi target for a host. The host has been patched etc, so reboot. You may want to set up ip forwarding etc on this instance. $$$ Second host: No storage. Attach Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS iso to the instance to boot from initially. Two NICs, first attached to bridge1. Second attached to bridge2. Go through the installation procedure, logging in to the iscsi endpoint on 192.168.0.1, using the details above (no username/password necessary with this configuration) and install to the iSCSI target. At the end, detach the CD-ROM and ensure everything is set up to network boot. On start-up you should see it network boot happily, everything is awesome. Do a "sudo apt update" and "sudo apt upgrade". Then reboot. On start-up you should see the bug happening. ipconfig is sending out DHCP requests on both interfaces and failing to accept any responses it is being sent ("journalctl -xef -u dnsmasq" on primary shows it is sending them). If you remove that second NIC, you'll see that the instance is able to boot happily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I'm continuing to bisect the mainline linux kernel, and also trying to see if I can create a straightforward reproducible example. First focus on bisecting was between 4.5 and 4.6, to figure out what changed to suddenly have ipconfig working. I've tracked it down to this using bisect, and validated it afterwards: commit 689de1d6ca95b3b5bd8ee446863bf81a4883ea25 Author: Linus TorvaldsDate: Mon May 2 12:46:42 2016 -0700 Minimal fix-up of bad hashing behavior of hash_64() This is a fairly minimal fixup to the horribly bad behavior of hash_64() with certain input patterns. In particular, because the multiplicative value used for the 64-bit hash was intentionally bit-sparse (so that the multiply could be done with shifts and adds on architectures without hardware multipliers), some bits did not get spread out very much. In particular, certain fairly common bit ranges in the input (roughly bits 12-20: commonly with the most information in them when you hash things like byte offsets in files or memory that have block factors that mean that the low bits are often zero) would not necessarily show up much in the result. There's a bigger patch-series brewing to fix up things more completely, but this is the fairly minimal fix for the 64-bit hashing problem. It simply picks a much better constant multiplier, spreading the bits out a lot better. NOTE! For 32-bit architectures, the bad old hash_64() remains the same for now, since 64-bit multiplies are expensive. The bigger hashing cleanup will replace the 32-bit case with something better. The new constants were picked by George Spelvin who wrote that bigger cleanup series. I just picked out the constants and part of the comment from that series. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Cc: George Spelvin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Next up is tracking down what changed between 4.7 and 4.8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I've tried every version in the v4 series, and a few in v3. None prior to (and including) v4.0.0 will boot, none output anything on the screen to give me a clue why they're not booting. So far: v4.0 = won't boot v4.1 = ipconfig bug v4.2 = ipconfig bug v4.3 = ipconfig bug v4.4 = ipconfig bug v4.5 = ipconfig bug v4.6 = Boots v4.7 = Boots v4.8 = ipconfig bug v4.9 = ipconfig bug v4.10 = ipconfig bug I'm getting seriously concerned that "working" is actually the aberration. It's working in just two out of ten releases. I do have two things I should probably bisect there: 1) what changed between 4.5 and 4.6, and 2) what changed between 4.7 and 4.8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
The more I look at this, the more I'm convinced *most* of the real problem lies in that ipconfig tool. Yes, various kernel changes seem to make it alter between working & not working under the circumstances (which is bizarre), but unless something is specifically interfering with the inter-process communication, ipconfig appears to be ignoring valid dhcp responses, just based on whether you tell it "all" interfaces vs telling it a specific interface. A small modification could be made to the initramfs-tools to have it iterate over the interfaces in the system one-at-a-time. It would marginally slow down the boot should the relevant interface not be the first, but it would get rid of this bug entirely. Or the intird environment could be modified to use dhclient instead of ipconfig (dhclient appears to be in the initrd, and works perfectly fine when called in a generic fashion, though the other initramfs-tools scripts seem aware ipconfig didn't complete successfully which I haven't looked in to) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
My apologies for any lack of clarity. I tested against the head of ubuntu-xenial, reverting just that commit and it fixed it. I tested against the head of the mainstream kernel and it didn't (last night I tried 4.9, 4.8, 4.5, 4.4, 4.2 tags of the mainstream kernel and in every place I find the general bug in effect). I'll try some larger leaps and see if I can track it down elsewhere. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I tried reverting that specific commit from upstream, but that didn't resolve the issue. Time for a new round of bisecting the kernel, this time using mainline. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
This seems to make no sense to me, as a layman anyway. I checked out the 4.4.0-58.79 tag, reverted that one commit and confirmed I have a booting 4.4.0-58-generic that'll happily DHCP in the initrd environment on multiple boots. It really does seem like, somehow, that commit is the source of the problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I bisected again, and again it came back to that mount point change. This seems so bizarre. $ git bisect log # bad: [6d4f0a79e5a307b6fd3ee3cc5bbb2fcb701b09db] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-4.4.0-57.78 # good: [db5f146d309e70067dae57798c9ea679af835aa7] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-4.4.0-53.74 git bisect start 'Ubuntu-4.4.0-57.78' 'Ubuntu-4.4.0-53.74' # bad: [02bf412367b827aa5be05a315088ef5fdcf267ca] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix spurious flag status for mem2mem transfers git bisect bad 02bf412367b827aa5be05a315088ef5fdcf267ca # bad: [1e089050b800ba7d6ba1bf5814827e6cca301ad5] smc91x: avoid self-comparison warning git bisect bad 1e089050b800ba7d6ba1bf5814827e6cca301ad5 # bad: [d7632bdaba3dd143eac3c80bb7e2b0f62259583d] xhci: use default USB_RESUME_TIMEOUT when resuming ports. git bisect bad d7632bdaba3dd143eac3c80bb7e2b0f62259583d # bad: [7942010de9a2fe39e72b84e628867f4ff29a70f2] libxfs: clean up _calc_dquots_per_chunk git bisect bad 7942010de9a2fe39e72b84e628867f4ff29a70f2 # good: [9d2524b0bdeb57f80d0279f6695a833606ad0597] UBUNTU: SAUCE: Bluetooth: decrease refcount after use git bisect good 9d2524b0bdeb57f80d0279f6695a833606ad0597 # bad: [fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0] mnt: Add a per mount namespace limit on the number of mounts git bisect bad fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0 # good: [f2109fe47ceb77647ef7d4f545efeba43d06fb64] videobuf2-v4l2: Verify planes array in buffer dequeueing git bisect good f2109fe47ceb77647ef7d4f545efeba43d06fb64 # good: [d5d9494d2092a7e571dee635ca254075912355c1] thinkpad_acpi: Add support for HKEY version 0x200 git bisect good d5d9494d2092a7e571dee635ca254075912355c1 # first bad commit: [fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0] mnt: Add a per mount namespace limit on the number of mounts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I see where I messed up.. I'll try the bisect again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Okay... I can't help but think I made a mistake somewhere in the bisecting process, but it seems to have isolated fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0 as the bad commit $ git bisect log # bad: [6d4f0a79e5a307b6fd3ee3cc5bbb2fcb701b09db] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-4.4.0-57.78 # good: [40a98f0e91bcc062babd017732cbf7cb20cf39fd] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-4.4.0-51.72 git bisect start 'Ubuntu-4.4.0-57.78' 'Ubuntu-4.4.0-51.72' # bad: [cd29d2303e86529c089b1c292480c05e7a24bd16] drm/i915: Respect alternate_ddc_pin for all DDI ports git bisect bad cd29d2303e86529c089b1c292480c05e7a24bd16 # bad: [617dec606ff9e43e64a06daef83e17da0035340a] drm/exynos: fix error handling in exynos_drm_subdrv_open git bisect bad 617dec606ff9e43e64a06daef83e17da0035340a # bad: [0dbd2050197ea4dd59f8957b72981cb7d2cfab1c] usb: gadget: function: u_ether: don't starve tx request queue git bisect bad 0dbd2050197ea4dd59f8957b72981cb7d2cfab1c # bad: [f3f9de1bd9a63b633946226ba23392ad44e2badf] i2c: core: fix NULL pointer dereference under race condition git bisect bad f3f9de1bd9a63b633946226ba23392ad44e2badf # good: [a0678a6643bf688bccce3c298a4a110af10988fc] ipv6: correctly add local routes when lo goes up git bisect good a0678a6643bf688bccce3c298a4a110af10988fc # good: [a0ae41d8ee0549161174a39d60f7316b67a87cae] Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for 0cf3:e009 git bisect good a0ae41d8ee0549161174a39d60f7316b67a87cae # good: [d5d9494d2092a7e571dee635ca254075912355c1] thinkpad_acpi: Add support for HKEY version 0x200 git bisect good d5d9494d2092a7e571dee635ca254075912355c1 # bad: [a6e674fa25854a7dafc59555d508855ea8fe3eaa] i2c: xgene: Avoid dma_buffer overrun git bisect bad a6e674fa25854a7dafc59555d508855ea8fe3eaa # bad: [fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0] mnt: Add a per mount namespace limit on the number of mounts git bisect bad fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0 # first bad commit: [fd4b5fa6e3487d15ede746f92601af008b2abbc0] mnt: Add a per mount namespace limit on the number of mounts >From a layman perspective, it doesn't seem like that could possibly cause the >bug. I guess one quick way forward, rather than repeat the whole bisecting process, is to completely reset the repository, bring it up to date, verify the bug still exists, and then revert this specific commit and see if the bug goes away. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I'll take a fresh look in the morning, but ran into this: make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian/build/build-generic/zfs/module' Debug: module-check-generic install -d /home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian.master/abi/4.4.0-54.76/amd64 find /home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian/build/build-generic/ -name \*.ko | \ sed -e 's/.*\/\([^\/]*\)\.ko/\1/' | sort > /home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian.master/abi/4.4.0-54.76/amd64/generic.modules II: Checking modules for generic...previous or current modules file missing! /home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian.master/abi/4.4.0-54.76/amd64/generic.modules /home/ubuntu/storage/ubuntu-xenial/debian.master/abi/4.4.0-54.75/amd64/generic.modules debian/rules.d/4-checks.mk:12: recipe for target 'module-check-generic' failed make: *** [module-check-generic] Error 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I can give that a shot, following the instructions here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/KernelBisection#Bisecting_Ubuntu_kernel_versions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I should clarify, I know for certain that 4.4.0-51 is stable and reliable (and doesn't exhibit the bug). As part of our attempt to verify everything was correct with the installation we had a system run from Wednesday before Thanksgiving, all the way through to the following Monday, during which time it had an rc.local triggered reboot (so it had to be fully booted). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Okay.. this is interesting. It seems like the Ubuntu dev version of 4.10 is actually intermittently failing (?!) I guess the next thing to do here is keep rebooting on this version of the kernel and see how often the bug occurs vs doesn't occur, so I can get a feel for a reasonable number of times to reboot with each test kernel once I actually start bisecting. >From the dhcp server side I can't see anything different. The requests look the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Gah.. okay https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Rolling that command against master fails too: ubuntu@Beta:~/linux$ mainline-build-one afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc xenial *** BUILDING: commit:afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc series:xenial abinum: ... full_version<4.4.0> version<4.4.0> long abinum<040400> fatal: 'xenial' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. error: pathspec 'xenial/master' did not match any file(s) known to git. Deleted branch BUILD.040400 (was 794249c). Checking out files: 100% (33279/33279), done. Switched to a new branch 'BUILD.040400' vvv - build head commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc Author: Linus TorvaldsDate: Sun Jan 10 15:01:32 2016 -0800 Linux 4.4 ^^^ - build head fatal: invalid reference: xenial/master fatal: invalid reference: xenial/master-next fatal: invalid reference: xenial/master fatal: invalid reference: xenial/master-next On branch BUILD.040400 nothing to commit, working directory clean *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0001-DISABLE-comedi.patch (drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/das08_cs.c 47a4f33c4733880faa50f0e64a6e5c8f 79236ea0358db3c7a7a8a5f081c320b4) ... md5sum: drivers/staging/ti-st/st_kim.c: No such file or directory *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0002-DISABLE-ti-st.patch (drivers/staging/ti-st/st_kim.c b41944e0c30683bdedb6a66e11098892 ) ... md5sum: drivers/staging/hv/hv_mouse.c: No such file or directory *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0003-DISABLE-hyperv.patch (drivers/staging/hv/hv_mouse.c afd5524c29871a8293518f0be50a7474 ) ... *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0004-DISABLE-olpc.patch (drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c 13b325ae1aeee7f8602759057ed0d1f9 9d099e35d45e22f96c4d77694a5e6c58) ... *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0005-UBUNTU-olpc_dcon_xo_1-needs-delay.h.patch (drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c 6a0ae9f73f4878052202473bb952d6e4 9d099e35d45e22f96c4d77694a5e6c58) ... *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0006-UBUNTU-olpc_dcon_xo_1_5-needs-delay.h.patch (drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1_5.c 55c01b13d520fa0cdde88d8d3034f21c 37460a6a542aa92444e9114105621f18) ... *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0007-x86-idle-APM-requires-pm_idle-always-when-it-is-a-mo.patch (arch/x86/kernel/process.c 1ded15dd3a3cb622df182d60160ff826 73538a1ff57235e73e0342d9efa681f5) ... md5sum: debian/rules.d/2-binary-arch.mk: No such file or directory *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0008-UBUNTU-packaging-do-not-fail-secure-copy-on-older-ke.patch (debian/rules.d/2-binary-arch.mk 647c141b53e037781844f0c04234526e ) ... md5sum: arch/arm/mach-highbank/clock.c: No such file or directory *** checking /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/0009-UBUNTU-SAUCE-highbank-export-clock-functions-for-mod.patch (arch/arm/mach-highbank/clock.c 119a926bf04eae5024a3002b626ef8bc ) ... *** applying /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/any-0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-add-vmlinux.strip-to-BOOT_TARGETS1-on-p.patch ... Applying: UBUNTU: SAUCE: add vmlinux.strip to BOOT_TARGETS1 on powerpc *** applying /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/any-0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-tools-hv-lsvmbus-add-manual-page.patch ... Applying: UBUNTU: SAUCE: tools/hv/lsvmbus -- add manual page *** applying /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/adhoc/yakkety-0001-disable-pie-when-gcc-has-it-enabled-by-default.patch ... Applying: UBUNTU: SAUCE: (no-up) disable -pie when gcc has it enabled by default fatal: Not a valid object name xenial/master-next:debian.master/changelog dpkg-parsechangelog: warning:-(l0): found end of file where expected first heading dpkg-parsechangelog: error: fatal error occurred while parsing - fatal: Not a valid object name xenial/master:debian.master/changelog dpkg-parsechangelog: warning:-(l0): found end of file where expected first heading dpkg-parsechangelog: error: fatal error occurred while parsing - /home/ubuntu/kteam-tools/mainline-build/mainline-build-one: line 291: debian/changelog.new: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat 'debian/changelog.new': No such file or directory On branch BUILD.040400 nothing to commit, working directory clean *** using configs from Ubuntu-0 () ... fatal: invalid reference: Ubuntu-0 fatal: invalid reference: xenial/ xenial-amd64: chroot not found (::,) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Ahh, I see where the kteam tools stuff is supposed to come from. It's not clear if I'm supposed to go down that route and use the mainline-build-one script or not when trying to build the kernel in this case. If I use the mainline-build-one tool: $ mainline-build-one afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc xenial *** BUILDING: commit:afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc series:xenial abinum: ... full_version<4.4.0> version<4.4.0> long abinum<040400> fatal: 'xenial' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. error: pathspec 'xenial/master' did not match any file(s) known to git. error: Cannot delete the branch 'BUILD.040400' which you are currently on. fatal: A branch named 'BUILD.040400' already exists. The only way this tool works with that syntax is to switch to the master branch, and run it from there. I'm not sure how that's supposed to work with git bisect, given bisect is setting your checked out position. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I'll get started on it. This might take a while to do. A couple of quick observations: 1) we haven't validated that mainline 4.4.0 actually works. I only know certain Ubuntu versions of the 4.4.0 kernel work. Given how much seems to be changing between Ubuntu releases of it, that seems a risky assumption to make. I'll start by proving that first. 2) On the wiki you linked to: "To do this, you can use the mainline- build-one script which can be found at ~kteam-tools/malinline-build /maineline-build-one ." A proper link would be useful. Where is ~kteam-tools? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Tried and tested (the current up-to-date kernels at the time of posting): http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.10-rc1/linux- headers-4.10.0-041000rc1-generic_4.10.0-041000rc1.201612252031_amd64.deb http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.10-rc1/linux- image-4.10.0-041000rc1-generic_4.10.0-041000rc1.201612252031_amd64.deb They do not appear to suffer from the bug, dhcp was able to complete happily via the startup scripts in the initrd environment, and the host booted successfully. ** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream ** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream-4.10-rc1 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I've also confirmed the bug is present all the way back in 4.4.0-21-generic, and is present in 4.8.0-34-generic from yakkety- proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
I've worked my way back through the kernels. The bug, as it was (avoided by ip=dhcp in the kernel command line), was in effect in version 4.4.0-38-generic. It was fixed in 4.4.0-42-generic. This is the state of play so far with kernels I've tested: linux-image-4.4.0-38-generic - Affected linux-image-4.4.0-42-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-43-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-45-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-47-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-51-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-53-generic - Fine linux-image-4.4.0-57-generic - Affected linux-image-4.4.0-58-generic - Affected (kernel in proposed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
apport-collect doesn't exist in initrd. I'm unable to supply the requested information. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
** Attachment added: "pcap from dhcp server side of inird startup doing dhcp" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+attachment/4795820/+files/failed.pcap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
The checksum invalid mentioned in the pcap is interesting, but happens in both failed and successful, so I'm not sure it's relevant. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
** Attachment added: "pcap from dhcp server side of 'ipconfig -t "dhcp" -d "ens2f0" '" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+attachment/4795819/+files/worked.pcap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
** Attachment added: "Working 4.4.0-53 initrd" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+attachment/4795794/+files/initrd.img-4.4.0-53-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] Re: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
** Attachment added: "4.4.0-57 "broken" initrd" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+attachment/4795793/+files/initrd.img-4.4.0-57-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1652348] [NEW] initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response
Public bug reported: Between kernel versions 4.4.0-53 and 4.4.0-57 a bug has been (re?)introduced that is breaking dhcp booting in the initrd environment. This is stopping instances that use iscsi storage from being able to connect. Over serial console it outputs: IP-Config: no response after 2 secs - giving up IP-Config: ens2f0 hardware address 90:e2:ba:d1:36:38 mtu 1500 DHCP RARP IP-Config: ens2f1 hardware address 90:e2:ba:d1:36:39 mtu 1500 DHCP RARP IP-Config: no response after 3 secs - giving up with increasing delays until it fails. At which point a simple ipconfig -t dhcp -d "ens2f0" works. The console output is slightly garbled but should give you an idea: (initramfs) ipconfig -t dhcp -[ 728.379793] ixgbe :13:00.0 ens2f0: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000 d "ens2f0" IP-Config: ens2f0 hardware address 90:e2:ba:d1:36:38 mtu 1500 DHCP RARP IP-Config: ens2f0 guessed broadcast address 10.0.1.255 IP-Config: ens2f0 complete (dhcp from 169.254.169.254): addres[ 728.980448] ixgbe :13:00.0 ens2f0: detected SFP+: 3 s: 10.0.1.56broadcast: 10.0.1.255 netmask: 255.255.255.0 gateway: 10.0.1.1 [ 729.148410] ixgbe :13:00.0 ens2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX dns0 : 169.254.169.254 dns1 : 0.0.0.0 rootserver: 169.254.169.254 rootpath: filename : /ipxe.efi tcpdumps show that dhcp requests are being received from the host, and responses sent, but not accepted by the host. When the ipconfig command is issued manually, an identical dhcp request and response happens, only this time it is accepted. It doesn't appear to be that the messages are being sent and received incorrectly, just silently ignored by ipconfig. I was seeing this behaviour earlier this year, which I was able to fix by specifying "ip=dhcp" as a kernel parameter. About a month ago that was identified as causing us other problems (long story) and we dropped it, at which point we discovered the original bug was no longer an issue. Putting "ip=dhcp" back on with this kernel no longer fixes the problem. I've compared the two initrds and effectively the only thing that has changed between the two is the kernel components. I'm going to try and track back through kernel versions to see if I can find which version the fix happened in to maybe provide some additional context. I'll also attach copies of the initrds, packet captures etc. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652348 Title: initrd dhcp fails / ignores valid response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1652348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1312243] Re: error messages completing args inside $()
Still seems to be affecting 16.04. It's really quite annoying. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312243 Title: error messages completing args inside $() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/1312243/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present
We can tackle the other aspects of this on other tickets, but it does seem like we have a good understanding of what is happening here. I want to make sure we don't end up derailing slightly here from the "bug" as it were (though it's not so much a bug, it appears) Just operating from the principle of least-surprise, if cloud-init tells you in a file "create this file like so, and it'll stop this one being generated", I would expect that to be the case. On the other hand adding in the conditionals to the comment seems like maybe it would be overloading the comments in the file? I like to keep such comments about as short and sweet as possible. Would it be more realistic to get the behaviour documented and just point to the documents (but then I guess what about versioning?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present
Kernel command line: $ cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=(http)/kernel initrd=initrd root=/dev/sda3 ro netroot=iscsi:@169.254.0.2::3260::iqn.2015-02.oracle.boot:uefi crashkernel=auto ip=dhcp iscsi_initiator=iqn.2015-10.oracle:2.1g1538-gb000393 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 console=ttyS0,9600 console=tty0 The datasource is a yaml file we generate on instance launch that is made accessible to the host over http. At the moment it contains very little information: $ curl http://169.254.169.254/openstack/latest/meta_data.json { "uuid" : "ocid1.instance.oc1.phx.abyhqljszmao4waexfg6gxtu73phfgeclyyscoi6r3evhsaba24uupp3hu5q", "name" : "nvmetest", "availability_zone" : "phx-ad-2", "hostname" : "nvmetest", "public_keys" : { "0" : "<>" }, "meta" : { } } It's also available via a few different URLs, e.g. http://169.254.169.254/openstack/2013-10-17/meta_data.json will return the same content. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present
Trying another time. Again, clean instance. This time using a very minimal cloud.cfg: $ cat /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg users: - default datasource_list: ['OpenStack'] datasource: OpenStack: metadata_urls: ['http://169.254.169.254'] timeout: 10 max_wait: 20 cloud_init_modules: - users-groups system_info: distro: ubuntu default_user: name: opc lock_passwd: true gecos: Oracle Public Cloud User groups: [wheel, adm, audio, cdrom, dialout, dip, floppy, lxd, netdev, plugdev, sudo, video] sudo: ["ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL"] shell: /bin/bash paths: cloud_dir: /var/lib/cloud/ templates_dir: /etc/cloud/templates/ upstart_dir: /etc/init/ ssh_svcname: ssh $ echo "network: {config: disabled}" | sudo tee /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg network: {config: disabled} $ sudo rm /etc/network/interfaces/50-cloud-init.cfg rm: cannot remove '/etc/network/interfaces/50-cloud-init.cfg': Not a directory And again after a reboot: $ cat /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg # This file is generated from information provided by # the datasource. Changes to it will not persist across an instance. # To disable cloud-init's network configuration capabilities, write a file # /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg with the following: # network: {config: disabled} auto lo iface lo inet loopback # control-manual ens2f0 iface ens2f0 inet dhcp broadcast 10.0.0.255 dns-nameservers 169.254.169.254 gateway 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 $ grep "INFO.*disabled" /var/log/cloud-init.log $ I've attached a cloud-init log from this run as well. Hopefully should be more succinct. ** Attachment added: "cloud-init.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+attachment/4775518/+files/cloud-init.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present
Clean instance, ran apt upgrade, and apt install cloud-init. I didn't replace the cloud.cfg file with one of our format as I tried to keep changes as minimal as possible, and the supplied one seems to work sufficiently. $ echo "network: {config: disabled}" | sudo tee /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg network: {config: disabled} $ sudo rm /etc/network/interfaces/50-cloud-init.cfg rm: cannot remove '/etc/network/interfaces/50-cloud-init.cfg': Not a directory $ sudo reboot packet_write_wait: Connection to UNKNOWN: Broken pipe After reboot: $ cat /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg # This file is generated from information provided by # the datasource. Changes to it will not persist across an instance. # To disable cloud-init's network configuration capabilities, write a file # /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg with the following: # network: {config: disabled} auto lo iface lo inet loopback # control-manual ens2f0 iface ens2f0 inet dhcp broadcast 10.0.0.255 dns-nameservers 169.254.169.254 gateway 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 $ grep "INFO.*disabled" /var/log/cloud-init.log $ I've attached a copy of the cloud-init.log ** Attachment added: "cloud-init.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+attachment/4775436/+files/cloud-init.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640635] [NEW] cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present
Public bug reported: Package: cloud-init 0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1~16.04.3 The file /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg states that: # This file is generated from information provided by # the datasource. Changes to it will not persist across an instance. # To disable cloud-init's network configuration capabilities, write a file # /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg with the following: # network: {config: disabled} On a system with this file created: # cat /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg network: {config: disabled} cloud-init still ends up creating the 50-cloud-init.cfg file. opensnoop shows that cloud-init is definitely reading that 99-disable-network- config.cfg file: # opensnoop /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg Tracing open()s for filenames containing "/etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg". Ctrl-C to end. COMM PID FD FILE cloudinit0x3 /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg I've been trying to follow the code logic, and I'm not seeing any check to see if the network configuration is set to disabled or not. ** Affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1640635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1629972] Re: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root filesystem
I ran into this with iSCSI root. Installing cloud-init resulted in problems rebooting. If I install the ifupdown patch (without cloud-init installed), that triggers the bug for me. Spinning up a clean instance, installing cloud-init, letting it run (so the conditions that cause the bug are triggered), then installing the ifupdown package also fails to fix the reboot problems. I've confirmed this persists after the next boot as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629972 Title: networking stop incorrectly disconnects from (network) root filesystem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1629972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1632405] [NEW] virt-customize enters infinite loop: dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab
Public bug reported: When running virt-customize against an existing raw image, it seems to hang and do nothing. With verbose flag passed the logs are filled with: /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file RTNETLINK answers: File exists /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file RTNETLINK answers: File exists /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file RTNETLINK answers: File exists /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file RTNETLINK answers: File exists /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file RTNETLINK answers: File exists /sbin/dhclient-script: 31: /sbin/dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab: No such file over and over again. $ dpkg -l | grep guestfs ii libguestfs-hfsplus:amd64 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - HFS+ support ii libguestfs-perl 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - Perl bindings ii libguestfs-reiserfs:amd64 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - ReiserFS support ii libguestfs-rescue:amd64 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - virt-rescue enhancements ii libguestfs-rsync:amd641:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - rsync support ii libguestfs-tools 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - tools ii libguestfs-xfs:amd64 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - XFS support ii libguestfs0:amd64 1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2 amd64guest disk image management system - shared library $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS Release:16.04 According to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+question/372927 this is fixed in 1.34, though I haven't verified this for myself. ** Affects: libguestfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632405 Title: virt-customize enters infinite loop: dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/1632405/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626679] Re: NVMe triggering kernel panic followed by "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!"
There isn't a kernel in proposed at the moment, but I've tested using the latest in yakkety and it seems to be working fine. I don't have a simple replication case for the bug, unfortunately. It just seems to happen for (hand-wavey guess) 50% of boots. So far I've got this 4.8.0-19-generic kernel to boot several times over without problem. I'll keep rebooting and rebooting the server in the background today, just in case, while I focus on other stuff. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626679 Title: NVMe triggering kernel panic followed by "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1626679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626679] [NEW] NVMe triggering kernel panic followed by "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!"
Public bug reported: On an NVMe system I'm using, Ubuntu 16.04.1 regularly seems to trigger off a kernel panic against somepart of the NVMe driver it looks like, after which the logs get filled with entries over and over again of: "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!" Here's the initial stack trace that seems to trigger off the bug: Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478175] [ cut here ] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478185] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 0 at /build/linux-dcxD3m/linux-4.4.0/kernel/irq/manage.c:1438 __free_irq+0x1d2/0x280() Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478188] Trying to free IRQ 38 from IRQ context! Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478191] Modules linked in: nls_iso8859_1 ipmi_ssif intel_rapl x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass ioatdma me i_me sb_edac shpchp edac_core lpc_ich mei 8250_fintek ipmi_msghandler mac_hid ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr autofs4 btrfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear crct10dif_pclmul ixgbe crc32_pclmu l dca vxlan aesni_intel ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel aes_x86_64 lrw gf128mul ptp glue_helper ahci ablk_helper pps_core cryptd nvme libahci mdio wmi fjes Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478257] CPU: 13 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/13 Not tainted 4.4.0-31-generic #50-Ubuntu Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478260] Hardware name: Oracle Corporation ORACLE SERVER X5-2/ASM,MOTHERBOARD,1U, BIOS 30080100 04/13/2016 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478263] 0286 4fea3140a01056a3 883f7f743b10 813f1143 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478267] 883f7f743b58 81cb61f8 883f7f743b48 81081102 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478271] 0026 883f5b2ea700 0026 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478275] Call Trace: Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478277][] dump_stack+0x63/0x90 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478290] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478294] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5c/0x80 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478299] [] ? try_to_grab_pending+0xb3/0x160 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478302] [] __free_irq+0x1d2/0x280 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478306] [] free_irq+0x3c/0x90 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478314] [] nvme_suspend_queue+0x89/0xb0 [nvme] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478320] [] nvme_disable_admin_queue+0x27/0x90 [nvme] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478325] [] nvme_dev_disable+0x29e/0x2c0 [nvme] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478330] [] ? __nvme_process_cq+0x210/0x210 [nvme] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478334] [] ? dev_warn+0x6c/0x90 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478340] [] nvme_timeout+0x110/0x1d0 [nvme] Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478344] [] ? cpumask_next_and+0x2f/0x40 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478348] [] ? load_balance+0x18c/0x980 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478354] [] blk_mq_rq_timed_out+0x2f/0x70 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478358] [] blk_mq_check_expired+0x4e/0x80 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478363] [] bt_for_each+0xd8/0xe0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478367] [] ? blk_mq_rq_timed_out+0x70/0x70 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478370] [] ? blk_mq_rq_timed_out+0x70/0x70 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478375] [] blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x47/0xc0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478379] [] ? blk_mq_attempt_merge+0xb0/0xb0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478383] [] blk_mq_rq_timer+0x41/0xf0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478389] [] call_timer_fn+0x35/0x120 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478393] [] ? blk_mq_attempt_merge+0xb0/0xb0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478397] [] run_timer_softirq+0x23a/0x2f0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478403] [] __do_softirq+0x101/0x290 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478407] [] irq_exit+0xa3/0xb0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478413] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x42/0x50 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478417] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x82/0x90 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478419][] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x111/0x2b0 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478428] [] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478432] [] call_cpuidle+0x32/0x60 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478436] [] ? cpuidle_select+0x13/0x20 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478440] [] cpu_startup_entry+0x290/0x350 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478444] [] start_secondary+0x154/0x190 Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478448] ---[ end trace 4f4c67e52b4d19ac ]--- then Sep 22 15:51:46 ubuntu kernel: [ 97.478463] BUG:
[Bug 1626679] Re: NVMe triggering kernel panic followed by "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!"
gzip'd copy of the kern.log showing the error. ** Attachment added: "kern.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1626679/+attachment/4746377/+files/kern.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626679 Title: NVMe triggering kernel panic followed by "bad: scheduling from the idle thread!" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1626679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1587572] [NEW] Installer doesn't provide UTC option for timezone
Public bug reported: On installing the server version of 16.04 you get asked to provide language and then a region for localisation. The text in the installer indicates that this will be used to help determine which timezone you want to use for the machine. If you put in English (US) and select United States for location, when you eventually get to the "set the time zone" prompt, the only option you get is to choose a US region. There is no possibility to select the UTC timezone. I've tried using "C - No Localization" as the language, but that doesn't really change things in this regards. I think I've tried just about every way through that dialogue that I can find but am failing to find UTC. Given the purpose of UTC, and just how common it is to run infrastructure using UTC as the time zone, it seems a little odd for it not to be a choice on all the dialogues for choosing timezones. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587572 Title: Installer doesn't provide UTC option for timezone To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1587572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1433396] Re: MATE 14.04 & 15.04: Window Snapping "freezes" with red/color background
I'm using the MATE PPA http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate- dev/ppa/ubuntu/ with Ubuntu 12.04.5, and get the same issue, so I'm not sure it's related to specific versions of Ubuntu. If there are any suitable packages for me to report on versions for, Id be happy to do so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433396 Title: MATE 14.04 & 15.04: Window Snapping "freezes" with red/color background To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1433396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496354] Re: amixer doesn't seem to unmute audio
This one affects me as well. Muting mutes the master, and headphone and PCM. Unmuting only unmutes Master. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496354 Title: amixer doesn't seem to unmute audio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/496354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: Unity launcher and Alt-Tab switcher missing entry for gnome-terminal
Can't say for sure if it's a problem any more or not. I've long since given up on Unity, in no small part due to this bug. The response on the bug report did little to convince me it was worth continuing to use it either. A whole bunch of people experiencing it, and the bug just constantly being punted off to the next milestone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: Unity launcher and Alt-Tab switcher missing entry for gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1310292] Re: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version
From the Debian POV, this is working as designed. If that's the case, why did Debian consider it a bug and fix it upstream? You've got me very confused. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 Title: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04
That worked for my peculiar case too. Mahalo! As Pablo commented, still seems to fail on mediafire.com but I'm not certain mediafire's end point is working correctly as it fails in both openssl (1.0.1-4ubuntu3) AND gnutls (3.0.11+really2.12.14-5ubuntu3) : $ openssl s_client -connect www.mediafire.com:443 CONNECTED(0003) 140199672272544:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:177: --- no peer certificate available --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 0 bytes and written 174 bytes --- New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE) Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE --- $ gnutls-cli www.mediafire.com -p 443 Resolving 'www.mediafire.com'... Connecting to '205.196.120.8:443'... *** Fatal error: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. *** Handshake has failed GnuTLS error: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. I should point out that it seems to work with the openssl 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 from 11.10, but doesn't with the gnutls 2.10.5-1ubuntu3.1 from 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965371 Title: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/965371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 901211] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompositeScreen::compositingActive()
Affected me last night, spawned off a tightvncserver instance, connected and got no launcher or icons. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901211 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in CompositeScreen::compositingActive() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/901211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
I was finally able to re-create this consistently. Clean install from Beta 1, press alt+f2, type in gnome-terminal, and hit enter (don't click the icon). That resulted in a gnome-terminal screen loading but with an unfilled triangle. It seems that some update since I originally reported the bug (and was seemingly derided, and then ignored) has resolved this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
I should add, the other problems still exist, as documented in screen captures and photographs. However given you've been ignoring those so far in the ticket, I suppose it's unlikely we'll see any kind of dialogue about them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959245] Re: Unity hud makes Alt+tab switching difficult
I've been butting up against this one on and off in the Beta. Seems to me in no small part to be down to how fast the graphic acceleration is. e.g. I hit this more on my computer at work as it's got a slow old Nvidia card in it, vs my home machine with a much higher spec card in it. If you've got an Nvidia card I've found that the Nouveau drivers seem to perform a lot better with Compiz than the proprietary. Switching to them has made Unity actually usable at work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959245 Title: Unity hud makes Alt+tab switching difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/959245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912031] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
Get this on choosing advanced partition tool during the installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912031 Title: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/partman-auto/+bug/912031/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
You've actually hit on the right problem there Tim. It looks like Unity is getting confused about where a window is. See the next attached two screenshots. In them you can see Gnome Terminal running behind Ubuntu Software Center, but according to the icon in the dock bar Unity thinks Gnome Terminal is on another desktop (it isn't, and I've double checked). Clicking on the Workspace Switcher and then a second time to bring it back to where it started seems to force Unity to reevaluate what is on what desktop and then Gnome Terminal suddenly ends up appearing in alt- tab. ** Attachment added: close up https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+attachment/2876826/+files/IMG_20120315_074703.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
** Attachment added: IMG_20120315_074710.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+attachment/2876839/+files/IMG_20120315_074710.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
I believe this problem is part of an even wider scope. Unity seems to be having big problems with remembering which workspace an application is associated. This is manifesting itself in one of three specific ways: 1) Applications not appearing in alt-tab. (usually combined with a hollow triangle on left, even if window is visible) 2) Applications appearing in dock as on the current workspace (solid triangle on left) but can't be brought to front by clicking on the icon. 3) In cases where 2) is the case, and the application is in alt-tab the menu bar doesn't alter for the application. Interaction with the application works so far as mouse clicking is concerned, but not for keyboard input, e.g. with Gedit I'm able to select and copy text but not get a live cursor in the window to alter it. It also means I can't click on any of the window resize buttons or get at the menu for the application forcing me to right click on the icon in the dash and quit from there. The attached screenshot 'Dead Parrot' show this, with Polly being the stuck application. Even though title bar isn't shaded (application is forefront) it doesn't have the menu bar and I can't type within the application, even though all other mouse based interaction works. ** Attachment added: Dead Parrot? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+attachment/2877819/+files/stuck.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727589] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
Got this under 12.04 as well. Pidgin 1:2.10.1-1ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727589 Title: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/727589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
That's interesting, I'm certainly not moving it (ctrl+alt+shift+direction isn't a combination you just stumble across), but also that doesn't explain what's going on in note #6 with screenshot where Chrome is clearly on the same workspace (you can see it right behind the active terminal pane) but not appearing in the alt-tab box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804662] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): execv() arg 2 must contain only strings
Installing manually works (for me)(, but not from Additional Hardware Wizard -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804662 Title: jockey-gtk crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): execv() arg 2 must contain only strings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/804662/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
Actually, I need to broaden the scope of this. Looks like it's affecting all sorts of apps at various stages. E.g. currently I have Chrome and Gnome-Terminal open. Alt+tab shows Terminal and Desktop, but not Chrome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
I'm not 100% convinced, but now wondering if it's just happening to the first app started on boot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
No. I hadn't moved the window, and I did double check on each workspace just in case. I'm a little surprised that the workspace switcher icon is non-dynamic. Almost every GUI indicates in some way that windows are open on other workspaces, even minimalist GUIs do it. I'm unable to re-create it this morning after spending 15-20 minutes yesterday succesfully re-creating it time after time (wanted to be sure I wasn't doing anything stupid). Only real difference between yesterday and today is I've installed the fglrx_updates drivers. I'll experiment with them on and off and see if it does make a difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
I've attached a hopefully a good example of the behaviour, this time affecting Chrome. In the foreground is Gnome Terminal, with transparency enabled (and a dmesg output just to have text appearing). Behind it you can see Google Chrome on the Google home page. In the alt+tab box you can see just Desktop and Terminal. To get Chrome to appear in the alt+tab box I had to switch to it (using dock icon) then press alt+tab whilst it had focus. Alt-tabbing between then works fine. ** Attachment added: Hopefully a good example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+attachment/2852850/+files/example.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884945] Re: aptitude show wrong package state
I'm seeing this in Precise still: dpkg output to show packages are installed: $ sudo dpkg -l | grep fgl ii fglrx-amdcccle-updates 2:8.911-0ubuntu1 Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators ii fglrx-updates 2:8.911-0ubuntu1 Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators Then a fairly non-specific search for fglrx: $ sudo aptitude search fglrx p fglrx - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators p fglrx-amdcccle - Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators p fglrx-amdcccle-updates - Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators v fglrx-control - v fglrx-control - p fglrx-dev - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators (devel files) v fglrx-driver - v fglrx-driver - v fglrx-driver-dev - v fglrx-driver-dev - p fglrx-updates - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators p fglrx-updates-dev - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators (devel files) If I search for fglrx-updates specifically though, it shows up as installed: $ sudo aptitude search fglrx-updates i fglrx-updates - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators p fglrx-updates-dev - Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators (devel files) System details: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release:12.04 Codename: precise ~$ dpkg -l | grep aptitude ii aptitude 0.6.5-1ubuntu1 terminal-based package manager (terminal interface only) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884945 Title: aptitude show wrong package state To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/884945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all apps
** Summary changed: - alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal + alt+tab doesn't show all apps ** Description changed: + edit: Updated title, its affecting more than gnome-terminal + 1) Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 2) unity: - Installed: 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 + Installed: 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 3) Gnome-Terminal to show in list of programs to alt+tab to. 4) Alt+Tab consistently fails to show gnome-terminal for 'a while' (I hate to be vague, I can't figure out what suddenly triggers it to appear in the box). See attached photograph of it occurring. I can make it happen at will: 1) Cold boot into Ubuntu. 2) Open gnome-terminal. 3) Open Firefox. 4) Press alt+tab. alt+tab window only shows Desktop and Firefox. In attached screenshot, note that gnome-terminal has a highlighted background and arrow, indicating an instance of it running, as is Firefox. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell] Date: Sat Mar 10 14:50:09 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301) ProcEnviron: - TERM=xterm - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=xterm + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Summary changed: - alt+tab doesn't show all apps + alt+tab doesn't show all running apps -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps
This seems to be happening quite frequently, but I can't figure out an exact sequence that results in it happening. Applications are not always registering as running according to dock, but are clearly loaded and visible on the screen, and not alt-tabbable. Also noticing, in cases where the program is loaded, not appearing in dock (see screenshot: chrome is clearly forefront, and not appearing in dock as running). Also it's not appearing in alt+tab. Pressing alt+tab to desktop reveals desktop and hides the window without any obvious way to recover it. Switching to any other running program and then alt+tabbing to desktop instead of taking you to the desktop then returns the window to the forefront. I guess I could take a video of this behaviour if it's of any value? ** Attachment added: chrome missing.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+attachment/2853848/+files/chrome%20missing.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show all running apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] [NEW] alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
Public bug reported: 1) Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release:12.04 2) unity: Installed: 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 3) Gnome-Terminal to show in list of programs to alt+tab to. 4) Alt+Tab consistently fails to show gnome-terminal for 'a while' (I hate to be vague, I can't figure out what suddenly triggers it to appear in the box). See attached photograph of it occurring. I can make it happen at will: 1) Cold boot into Ubuntu. 2) Open gnome-terminal. 3) Open Firefox. 4) Press alt+tab. alt+tab window only shows Desktop and Firefox. In attached screenshot, note that gnome-terminal has a highlighted background and arrow, indicating an instance of it running, as is Firefox. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell] Date: Sat Mar 10 14:50:09 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951929] Re: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal
** Attachment added: photo of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929/+attachment/2848135/+files/IMG_20120310_145309.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951929 Title: alt+tab doesn't show gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428853] Re: Remove SQl book reference in database section of Serverguide
This is no longer relevant. I'm not sure at which version the reference was removed, but it's certainly not been part of the last two revisions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428853 Title: Remove SQl book reference in database section of Serverguide To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/serverguide/+bug/428853/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs