[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Strange.  I built a Hardy virtual machine and 1.2.9 was installed.
Indeed, the archives do say 1.0.10.  I'll have to determine what
happened with my VM.  At any rate, if the error is thrown then that
version doesn't support the parameter.

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I didn't have any trouble upgrading a JeOS/vmbuilder Hardy server today.

-- 
Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I've only managed to use this parameter with Ubuntu  8.04 .  Otherwise,
the error above is thrown.

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets

2010-03-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Hmmm, the default shipped with 8.10 is

dovecot-imapd   1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3

but an updated 8.04 has

dovecot-imapd   1:1.2.9-1ubuntu3

Why does this parameter work with the older version?

And @Gaylord, why aren't you running the latest available with 8.04
anyway?

-- 
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-02-26 Thread Peter Matulis
I've uploaded comparable screenshots for both Jaunty and Karmic.

** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-904.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39827765/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-904_edited.png

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-02-26 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-910.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39827774/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-910_edited.png

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-02-08 Thread Peter Matulis
@Chase Douglas

The description is fine.  On Karmic, using a generic stress tool
('stress') the simulated load is reported but the specific (real-life)
load I refer to is not.  So the problem is a subtle one.

Thank you for the tutorial on cpu load. A *zero* load, however, that
corresponds to hundreds of running threads is enough to present a valid
case.  It doesn't matter how many cores I have.

@Surbhi

I will see what I can do to get identical comparisons.

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-02-04 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: dmesg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38757652/dmesg.txt

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-02-04 Thread Peter Matulis
Linux ewp1 2.6.31-14-server #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 15:07:34 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I doubt it.

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-03 Thread Peter Matulis
I doubt it.

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 516016] [NEW] [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openvpn

I have a server that was upgraded from 9.04 to 9.10.  I cannot say with
certainty what was happening during 9.04 but systematically when I
reboot the daemon does not come up:

$ sudo service openvpn status
[sudo] password for blah:
 * could not access PID file for VPN 'server'

$ sudo service openvpn start
 * Starting virtual private network daemon(s)...
 *   Autostarting VPN 'server'
   ...done.

 $ sudo service openvpn status
 * VPN 'server' is running

The server is currently being assigned an IP address (DHCP).  It looks
like that OpenVPN is coming up before that address is provided.  From
/var/log/syslog:

openvpn[815]: TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address 11.153.118.61:1194: 
Cannot assign requested address
openvpn[815]: Exiting
kernel: [   13.380034] br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state
dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.2
dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium.
dhclient: All rights reserved.
dhclient: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
dhclient: 
kernel: [   14.364042] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
kernel: [   14.428029] br0: no IPv6 routers present
dhclient: Listening on LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   Socket/fallback
dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 11.153.118.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 11.153.108.61 on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
dhclient: DHCPACK of 11.153.108.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: bound to 11.153.108.61 -- renewal in 102522 seconds

** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 516016] [NEW] [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openvpn

I have a server that was upgraded from 9.04 to 9.10.  I cannot say with
certainty what was happening during 9.04 but systematically when I
reboot the daemon does not come up:

$ sudo service openvpn status
[sudo] password for blah:
 * could not access PID file for VPN 'server'

$ sudo service openvpn start
 * Starting virtual private network daemon(s)...
 *   Autostarting VPN 'server'
   ...done.

 $ sudo service openvpn status
 * VPN 'server' is running

The server is currently being assigned an IP address (DHCP).  It looks
like that OpenVPN is coming up before that address is provided.  From
/var/log/syslog:

openvpn[815]: TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address 11.153.118.61:1194: 
Cannot assign requested address
openvpn[815]: Exiting
kernel: [   13.380034] br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state
dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.2
dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium.
dhclient: All rights reserved.
dhclient: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
dhclient: 
kernel: [   14.364042] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
kernel: [   14.428029] br0: no IPv6 routers present
dhclient: Listening on LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26
dhclient: Sending on   Socket/fallback
dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 11.153.118.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 11.153.108.61 on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
dhclient: DHCPACK of 11.153.108.61 from 11.153.118.1
dhclient: bound to 11.153.108.61 -- renewal in 102522 seconds

** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] [NEW] [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Overview:

Using java-based tools (tomcat) on 64-bit server Karmic reports almost
non-existent CPU load.  Screenshot (screenshot_910.png) displays this.
However, the same load applied to Jaunty shows a different report
(screenshot_904.png).  Note that stress tools applied to Karmic does
result in an increase in load (as expected).

Reproducible: 100%

Workaround:

Use Jaunty.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: load for 9.04
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38493677/screenshot_904.png

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: load for 9.10
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38493692/screenshot_910.png

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  Overview:
  
  Using java-based tools (tomcat) on 64-bit server Karmic reports almost
- non-existent CPU load.  Screenshot (screenshot_910.png) displays this.
- However, the same load applied to Jaunty shows a different report
- (screenshot_904.png).  Note that stress tools applied to Karmic does
- result in an increase in load (as expected).
+ non-existent CPU load.  Screenshot ('load for 9.10') displays this.
+ However, the same load applied to Jaunty shows a different report ('load
+ for 9.04').  Note that stress tools applied to Karmic does result in an
+ increase in load (as expected).
  
  Reproducible: 100%
  
  Workaround:
  
  Use Jaunty.

-- 
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
I did add a sync to the following file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/disk.py

Here

def umount(self):
self.vm.cancel_cleanup(self.umount)
if (self.type != TYPE_SWAP) and not self.dummy:
logging.debug('Syncing')
run_cmd('sync')
logging.debug('Unmounting %s', self.mntpath)
run_cmd('umount', self.mntpath)

But there is a umount happening before that function is called.

I ran vmbuilder in debug mode and here are the pertinent messages:

===
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : Reading package lists...
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : cleaning apt
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : ['chroot', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root', 'apt-get', 'clean']
2009-12-23 09:18:43,613 DEBUG   : Unmounting volatile lrm filesystems
2009-12-23 09:18:43,614 DEBUG   : Unbinding /dev and /proc filesystems
2009-12-23 09:24:43,714 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,718 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,723 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,727 INFO: umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,728 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : Oh, dear, an exception occurred
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO: Cleaning up
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,733 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   :  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : Syncing
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : ['sync']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,793 DEBUG   : Unmounting 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/
2009-12-23 09:24:43,794 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,803 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : loop deleted : /dev/loop2
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,819 DEBUG   : ['rmdir', 'kvm-test-desktop3']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,822 DEBUG   : ['rm', '-rf', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,885 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not 
permitted
2009-12-23 09:24:46,886 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not 
permitted
.
.
.
===

So, as suggested, I did run lsof:

$ sudo lsof -R /home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc

COMMAND   PID  PPID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF   NODE NAME
dd808 1 root0r   REG0,30 4026531987 /proc/kmsg
lsof21109 31948 root3r   DIR0,30  1 /proc
lsof21109 31948 root6r   DIR0,301176729 /proc/21109/fd

So dd (with init as parent) is to blame.

Then:

$ ps ax | grep -w dd
4 0   808 1  20   0   8192   604 syslog Ss   ?  0:00 dd bs=1 
if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/rsyslog/kmsg

Kernel messages appear to not have finished flushing to disk.

I decided to try a sleep in this file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/dapper.py

Here

def unmount_dev_proc(self):
import time
time.sleep(360)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev/pts' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/proc' % self.destdir)

But this did not help.

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
I did add a sync to the following file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/disk.py

Here

def umount(self):
self.vm.cancel_cleanup(self.umount)
if (self.type != TYPE_SWAP) and not self.dummy:
logging.debug('Syncing')
run_cmd('sync')
logging.debug('Unmounting %s', self.mntpath)
run_cmd('umount', self.mntpath)

But there is a umount happening before that function is called.

I ran vmbuilder in debug mode and here are the pertinent messages:

===
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : Reading package lists...
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : cleaning apt
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG   : ['chroot', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root', 'apt-get', 'clean']
2009-12-23 09:18:43,613 DEBUG   : Unmounting volatile lrm filesystems
2009-12-23 09:18:43,614 DEBUG   : Unbinding /dev and /proc filesystems
2009-12-23 09:24:43,714 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,718 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,723 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,727 INFO: umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,728 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : Oh, dear, an exception occurred
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO: Cleaning up
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,733 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   :  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : umount: 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : Syncing
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG   : ['sync']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,793 DEBUG   : Unmounting 
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/
2009-12-23 09:24:43,794 DEBUG   : ['umount', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,803 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : loop deleted : /dev/loop2
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG   : ['kpartx', '-d', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,819 DEBUG   : ['rmdir', 'kvm-test-desktop3']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,822 DEBUG   : ['rm', '-rf', 
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,885 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not 
permitted
2009-12-23 09:24:46,886 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not 
permitted
.
.
.
===

So, as suggested, I did run lsof:

$ sudo lsof -R /home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc

COMMAND   PID  PPID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF   NODE NAME
dd808 1 root0r   REG0,30 4026531987 /proc/kmsg
lsof21109 31948 root3r   DIR0,30  1 /proc
lsof21109 31948 root6r   DIR0,301176729 /proc/21109/fd

So dd (with init as parent) is to blame.

Then:

$ ps ax | grep -w dd
4 0   808 1  20   0   8192   604 syslog Ss   ?  0:00 dd bs=1 
if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/rsyslog/kmsg

Kernel messages appear to not have finished flushing to disk.

I decided to try a sleep in this file

/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/dapper.py

Here

def unmount_dev_proc(self):
import time
time.sleep(360)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev/pts' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/proc' % self.destdir)

But this did not help.

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
I want to specify that an iscsi volume can be attached on bootup and
shutdown with no problem.

Such a volume can also be mounted on bootup.

All this without any adjustments whatsoever (ex: changing the startup
links).

However, upon shutdown or reboot, if the volume happens to be mounted
then, and only then, do I get the problem stated above.  The tested
mounted filesystem was ext4 if that matters.

Evidently, iscsi targets are disconnected before the umount calls are
made.  I verified this by first manually unmounting the filesystem prior
to a successful reboot.

All this testing done with 9.10 on server and client.

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
So for fun I rejigged the startup commands and it made my local setup
work.  I doubt this is the proper way to go however.

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  18 2009-12-17 19:25 S33umountfs - ../init.d/umountfs
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  20 2009-12-17 19:29 S34open-iscsi - 
../init.d/open-iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  20 2009-12-17 19:25 S35networking - 
../init.d/networking

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Matulis
Just wanted to make obvious that my rc links given above are for rc0.d
and rc6.d .

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Matulis
Dustin,

I can confirm that an iscsi volume can be mounted automatically at boot
time for a Karmic client/initiator.

Now a reboot hangs terribly when such a volume is mounted.  I've
attached a screenshot.  It appears to confirm the comment above
(theterran wrote on 2009-06-15) where we need to screw around with the
shutdown scripts.  However, I quickly tried that workaround to no
effect.

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: iscsi_client_reboot-910-2.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37092003/iscsi_client_reboot-910-2.png

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497258] [NEW] vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

When using the line

--addpkg ubuntu-desktop

to the vmbuilder invocation unexpected messages appear near the end of
the process:

2009-12-15 20:57:38,007 INFO: Committed revision 2.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,097 INFO: umount: /tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc: 
device is busy.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: Cleaning up^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/queues': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/clients': Operation not permitted

and so on.  A complete transcript is attached.

After removing the line the process finishes OK.

Host is:

Linux U910S64-A 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux

** Affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: transcript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854188/transcript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Soory, transcript.txt is actually the shell script I used to do launch
vmbuilder.  The transcript is actually attached as typescript.txt (from
script command).

** Attachment added: typescript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854241/typescript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 497258] [NEW] vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

When using the line

--addpkg ubuntu-desktop

to the vmbuilder invocation unexpected messages appear near the end of
the process:

2009-12-15 20:57:38,007 INFO: Committed revision 2.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,097 INFO: umount: /tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc: 
device is busy.^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: (In some cases useful info about 
processes that use^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO:  the device is found by lsof(8) or 
fuser(1))^M
2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: Cleaning up^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/queues': Operation not permitted^M
2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove 
`/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/clients': Operation not permitted

and so on.  A complete transcript is attached.

After removing the line the process finishes OK.

Host is:

Linux U910S64-A 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux

** Affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: transcript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854188/transcript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Matulis
Soory, transcript.txt is actually the shell script I used to do launch
vmbuilder.  The transcript is actually attached as typescript.txt (from
script command).

** Attachment added: typescript.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854241/typescript.txt

-- 
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345957] Re: iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available

2009-12-14 Thread Peter Matulis
What other information is required to make this bug complete?  Currently
in Jaunty you cannot mount iscsi volumes at boot time without stuffing a
mount command in /etc/rc.local.

-- 
iscsid is looking for targets prior to network being available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 495189] [NEW] Cannot configure Encyclopedia plugin

2009-12-10 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: supybot

I'm running 9.10, upgraded from a fresh install of 9.04.

$ dpkg-query -W supybot

supybot 0.83.4.1.ds-2

I am using some plugins from Launchpad:

lp:~dennis/ubuntu-bots/main plugins_ubuntu-bots

This is my session with the bot:

13:06  pmatulis list  
 
13:06  bot Admin, Bugtracker, Channel, Config, Encyclopedia, Misc, Owner, and 
User
13:07  pmatulis list Encyclopedia 
 
13:07  bot addeditor, editors, moderators, and removeeditor   

13:07  pmatulis help Encyclopedia editors 
 
13:07  bot An error has occurred and has been logged.

The error message on the server:

INFO 2009-12-10T13:08:41 supybot help called by 
pmatulis!pe...@19f698f0.3ee626ce.96f3c2f7.ip.
ERROR 2009-12-10T13:08:41 supybot Uncaught exception in ['help'].
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/callbacks.py, line 1180, in 
_callCommand
self.callCommand(command, irc, msg, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/utils/python.py, line 86, in g
f(self, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/callbacks.py, line 1166, in 
callCommand
method(irc, msg, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/commands.py, line 913, in newf
f(self, irc, msg, args, *state.args, **state.kwargs)
  File /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/supybot/plugins/Misc/plugin.py, line 
200, in help
irc.reply(cbs[0].getCommandHelp(command, False))
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/callbacks.py, line 1212, in 
getCommandHelp
return help(method, name=formatCommand(command))
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/supybot/callbacks.py, line 226, in getHelp
doclines = method.__doc__.splitlines()
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'splitlines'
ERROR 2009-12-10T13:08:41 supybot Exception id: 0xabb82

** Affects: supybot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Cannot configure Encyclopedia plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495189
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 488898] Re: [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system; corrupt data

2009-12-03 Thread Peter Matulis
$ uname -a

Linux hostname 2.6.24-25-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:20:02 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux

This is actually a Canonical Support case.  I've asked the customer to
use apport-collect but that may not happen.  Let me know what other
information is required to move this one forward.  I don't have the
appropriate hardware to reproduce the issue.

-- 
[hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system;  
corrupt data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 488898] [NEW] [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system; corrupt data

2009-11-26 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

There is a problem using bonding with 80003ES2LAN network cards (e1000
module) on Hardy.  The system can hang and data corruption has been
observed.

Please see attachments: kernel_logs.txt

This is from a Sun Fire X2250

Red Hat confirmed bug and patch:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473258

The problem can be reproduced by executing, several times, the command:

# ethetool eth0

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device makes system hang
+ [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system;  
corrupt data

-- 
[hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system;  
corrupt data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 488898] Re: [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system; corrupt data

2009-11-26 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: kernel_logs.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36122199/kernel_logs.txt

-- 
[hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system;  
corrupt data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 488898] Re: [hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system; corrupt data

2009-11-26 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  There is a problem using bonding with 80003ES2LAN network cards (e1000
  module) on Hardy.  The system can hang and data corruption has been
  observed.
  
- Please see attachments: kernel_logs.txt and dmesg.
+ Please see attachments: kernel_logs.txt
  
  This is from a Sun Fire X2250
  
  Red Hat confirmed bug and patch:
  
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473258
  
  The problem can be reproduced by executing, several times, the command:
  
  # ethetool eth0

-- 
[hardy; e1000] ethtool operation to bonding slave device may hang system;  
corrupt data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: disks.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35659363/disks.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: dmesg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35659352/dmesg

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
- 8.04.3 64bit server
- linux-image-2.6.24-25-server 2.6.24-25.63
+ 8.10 64bit server
+ Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
- - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group m2
+ - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
- m2-root as /root (ext3)
- m2-swap_1 as swap
+ miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
+ miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
- Logical volume mlv has XFS filesystem and exported via NFS.
+ Logical volume miceserver has XFS filesystem and exported via NFS.
+ 
+ The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
+ complete LVM configuration.

** Description changed:

+ Symptoms:
+ 
+ 
  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
  8.10 64bit server
- Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
+ Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
  - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
  miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
  miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
- Logical volume miceserver has XFS filesystem and exported via NFS.
+ That group contains logical volume micedata which has 39TB XFS
+ filesystem exported via NFS.
  
  The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
  complete LVM configuration.

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  Symptoms:
  
+ These symptoms were also present in a Hardy installation.  Upgraded to
+ Intrepid in the hopes of resolving the issue.
  
  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
  8.10 64bit server
  Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
  - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
  miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
  miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
  That group contains logical volume micedata which has 39TB XFS
  filesystem exported via NFS.
  
  The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
  complete LVM configuration.

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
The PERC controllers use the megaraid_sas module.  The modinfo for it is
contained in attachment

megaraid_sas_8.10.txt

** Attachment added: megaraid_sas_8.10.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35662154/megaraid_sas_8.10.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
After a system freeze while still running 8.04, xfs_repair was run.
It's output is contained in attachment

xfs_repair_8.04.txt

** Attachment added: xfs_repair_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35662575/xfs_repair_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  Symptoms:
  
  These symptoms were also present in a Hardy installation.  Upgraded to
  Intrepid in the hopes of resolving the issue.
  
  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
  8.10 64bit server
  Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
  - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
  miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
  miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
  That group contains logical volume micedata which has 39TB XFS
  filesystem exported via NFS.
  
  The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
  complete LVM configuration.
+ 
+ Notes:
+ 
+ a) Physical memory was swapped out (no change).

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
Kernel output for system crashes.  See attachments:

system_crash1_8.04.txt
system_crash2_8.04.txt



Various kernel errors.  See attachments:

kernel_errors1_8.04.txt
kernel_errors2_8.04.txt

** Attachment added: system_crash1_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35663129/system_crash1_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
Last attachment was a duplicate.  Here is the correct one.

** Attachment added: kernel_errors2_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35663197/kernel_errors2_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: system_crash2_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35663136/system_crash2_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
I find this error especially troubling:

kernel: [81712.790055] attempt to access beyond end of device 
kernel: [81712.790059] dm-2: rw=0, want=47983366242312, limit=81996529664

There appears to be something wrong with how the kernel and the
filesystem are interacting. The kernel is making an I/O call that is
impossible to complete successfully.

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: kernel_errors1_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35663142/kernel_errors1_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: system_crash2_8.04.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35663145/system_crash2_8.04.txt

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481080] Re: Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-13 Thread Peter Matulis
** Description changed:

  Symptoms:
  
- These symptoms were also present in a Hardy installation.  Upgraded to
- Intrepid in the hopes of resolving the issue.
+ The system is extremely unstable during high loads of the NFS service.
+ Symptoms include:
+ 
+1. XFS filesystem becoming unavailable
+2. System freezing completely
+3. Various kern.log messages
+ 
+ Common message:
+ 
+ XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 281 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller 0x882bd4c6 
+ Filesystem dm-2: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0x8830b9b7 
+ Filesystem dm-2: Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down 
filesystem: dm-2 
+ Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
+ 
+ These symptoms were present in a Hardy installation.  Upgraded to
+ Intrepid in the hopes of resolving the issue but no improvement is
+ noticeable.  All log messages in this bug report are from 8.04.
  
  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
  8.10 64bit server
  Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
  - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
  miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
  miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
  That group contains logical volume micedata which has 39TB XFS
  filesystem exported via NFS.
  
  The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
  complete LVM configuration.
  
  Notes:
  
  a) Physical memory was swapped out (no change).

** Description changed:

  Symptoms:
  
- The system is extremely unstable during high loads of the NFS service.
- Symptoms include:
+ System is extremely unstable during high loads of NFS service exporting
+ 39TB of storage.  Symptoms include:
  
-1. XFS filesystem becoming unavailable
-2. System freezing completely
-3. Various kern.log messages
+    1. XFS filesystem becoming unavailable
+    2. System freezing completely
+    3. Various kern.log messages
  
  Common message:
  
- XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 281 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller 0x882bd4c6 
- Filesystem dm-2: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0x8830b9b7 
- Filesystem dm-2: Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down 
filesystem: dm-2 
+ XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 281 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller 0x882bd4c6
+ Filesystem dm-2: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0x8830b9b7
+ Filesystem dm-2: Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down 
filesystem: dm-2
  Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
  
  These symptoms were present in a Hardy installation.  Upgraded to
  Intrepid in the hopes of resolving the issue but no improvement is
  noticeable.  All log messages in this bug report are from 8.04.
  
  Hardware:
  
  Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
  Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR
  
  Ubuntu release:
  
  8.10 64bit server
  Linux miceserver 2.6.27-15-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 07:30:41 UTC 2009 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  Overview of setup:
  
  * System *
  Internal drive /dev/sda
  - sda1 as /boot (ext3)
  - sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group miceserver2
  
  Logical volumes:
  
  miceserver2-root as /root (ext3)
  miceserver2-swap_1 as swap
  
  * Storage *
  Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.
  
  First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
  Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc
  
  sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG
  
  That group contains logical volume micedata which has 39TB XFS
  filesystem exported via NFS.
  
  The disks.txt attachment details the entire disk subsystem including
  complete LVM configuration.
  
  Notes:
  
- a) Physical memory was swapped out (no change).
+ a) Physical memory was swapped out (no change)
+ b) Memory was originally 8 GB and now has 32 GB

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs 

[Bug 481080] [NEW] Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting

2009-11-11 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Hardware:

Dell PowerEdge 2950 (system) specs: http://is.gd/4Eohj
Dell Powervault MD1000 (storage) specs: http://is.gd/4EqcR

Ubuntu release:

8.04.3 64bit server
linux-image-2.6.24-25-server 2.6.24-25.63

Overview of setup:

* System *
Internal drive /dev/sda
- sda1 as /boot (ext3)
- sda5 as LVM physical volume with volume group m2

Logical volumes:

m2-root as /root (ext3)
m2-swap_1 as swap

* Storage *
Each pair of enclosures is RAID50 and is connected to a PERC6/e controller.

First pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdb
Second pair of enclosures - virtual volume - /dev/sdc

sdb and sdc are made RAID0 via LVM volume group DataVG

Logical volume mlv has XFS filesystem and exported via NFS.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Large XFS filesystem crashing / unmounting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 428435] Re: luks encrypted partition not detected or mounted automatically

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Matulis
So is someone working on fixing cryptsetup in karmic?  I see the
importance is Undecided and is not assigned to anyone.

-- 
luks encrypted partition not detected or mounted automatically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428435
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 428435] Re: luks encrypted partition not detected or mounted automatically

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Matulis
Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
 AFAIK there's nothing to fix for karmic. Karmic's cryptsetup is already
 fixed as it clears the superblock of newly created partitions. It's the
 old versions of cryptsetup that are broken and it might be a good idea
 to patch them up for every release which still is officially supported.

The truth is that this is going to cause a lot of grief for a great many
users.  Think about all the 8.04 users who will eventually upgrade to 10.04.

Is it too dangerous to incorporate the intelligence of your Python
script into karmic's cryptsetup?  Maybe invoke debconf for confirmation
of any action?  I think updating all old versions is a lot more work
than making the new one more intelligent.

 Anyway IMO this bug report must be kept open so that people will find it
 through bug search when karmic is released and will get bitten by this
 when they upgrade.

Then it will need to stay open until EOL of 8.04 which, for the server,
is April 2013.  It's just not the way to go IMO.

-- 
luks encrypted partition not detected or mounted automatically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428435
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 453145] Re: [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33786822/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453145
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 453145] [NEW] [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apt

I had enabled jaunty-proposed according to:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed

A subsequent upgrade to karmic left the preferences file unchanged:

-
Package: *
Pin: release a=jaunty-security
Pin-Priority: 990

Package: *
Pin: release a=jaunty-updates
Pin-Priority: 900

Package: *
Pin: release a=jaunty-proposed
Pin-Priority: 400
-

This is terrible since karmic-proposed was also left enabled after the
upgrade:

-
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ karmic-proposed main restricted 
multiverse universe
-

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Oct 16 09:58:26 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: apt 0.7.23.1ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.47-generic
SourcePackage: apt
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:2440): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2553): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (nautilus:2520): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (gnome-panel:2501): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to 
allocate widget with width -3 and height 24
 (nautilus:2995): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
[karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453145
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407750] Re: [kamic] kernel upgrade from jaunty don't refresh grub entry

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Matulis
I have heard a report of this happening but it is obviously not biting
systems consistently.  The problem must be triggered by something
specific on the system.  I know it's been a while but please archive the
following directory and attach it to the bug (dist-upgrade.tar.gz):

/var/log/dist-upgrade

-- 
[kamic] kernel upgrade from jaunty don't refresh grub entry 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403560] Re: [Karmic] Can not install daily image from USB flash drive

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Matulis
I tried installing with the Server Beta ISO with a USB CD drive and the
install fails at:

==
[!!]  Detect and mount CD-ROM
Your installation CD-ROM couldn't be mounted..

Try again to mount the CD-ROM?
Yes  No
==

Virtual console #4 (Alt-F4) shows:

cdrom-detect: Searching for Ubuntu installation media...
cdrom-detect: CD-ROM mount failed: device=/dev/sr0

** Summary changed:

- [Karmic] Can not install daily image from USB flash drive
+ [Karmic] Cannot install from USB device

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[Karmic] Cannot install from USB device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403560] Re: [Karmic] Cannot install from USB device

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Matulis
I was using the 64-bit Server ISO.

-- 
[Karmic] Cannot install from USB device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444458] Re: No NFS support in Karmic kernel 32bit generic-pae?

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis
** Package changed: ubuntu = linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
No NFS support in Karmic kernel 32bit generic-pae?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444458] Re: No NFS support in Karmic kernel 32bit generic-pae?

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis
I cannot reproduce this.

$ uname -a

2.6.31-11-generic-pae #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 12:53:03 UTC 2009 i686
GNU/Linux

$ sudo /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start

 * Exporting directories for NFS kernel daemon...
   ...done.
 * Starting NFS kernel daemon
   ...done.

-- 
No NFS support in Karmic kernel 32bit generic-pae?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444840] [NEW] [karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Running the karmic kernel under KVM with virtio disk (/dev/vda) causes
error messages to be sent to the console whenever the disk is accessed.
See dmesg.txt for the messages.  Sample:

[ 3651.003060] end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0

These messages are not created after changing the disk definition of dev
 bus from (vda  virtio) to (hda  ide).

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444840] Re: [karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: U910bS-2.xml
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33158142/U910bS-2.xml

** Description changed:

- Running the karmic kernel under KVM with virtio disk causes error
- messages to be sent to the console whenever the disk is accessed.
+ Running the karmic kernel under KVM with virtio disk (/dev/vda) causes
+ error messages to be sent to the console whenever the disk is accessed.
+ See dmesg.txt for the messages.  Sample:
+ 
+ [ 3651.003060] end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0

** Description changed:

  Running the karmic kernel under KVM with virtio disk (/dev/vda) causes
  error messages to be sent to the console whenever the disk is accessed.
  See dmesg.txt for the messages.  Sample:
  
  [ 3651.003060] end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0
+ 
+ These messages are not created after changing the disk definition of dev
+  bus from (vda  virtio) to (hda  ide).

-- 
[karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444840] Re: [karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: uname.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33158112/uname.txt

-- 
[karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 444840] Re: [karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33158127/dmesg.txt

-- 
[karmic] kernel error messages when run under KVM with virtio disk driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 440722] [NEW] [jaunty] apt-file --fixed-string option doesn't work

2009-10-02 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apt-file

According to the documentation (man page):

--fixed-string | -F 
   
  Do not expand search pattern with generic characters at pattern’s 
start and end.

This is not the case however:

$ apt-file -Fl list most
foremost
most

The following reported bug (circa 2006) touches on this but assumes the
documentation is wrong:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/33483

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: apt-file 2.2.0
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
SourcePackage: apt-file
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic i686

** Affects: apt-file (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
[jaunty] apt-file --fixed-string option doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440722] Re: [jaunty] apt-file --fixed-string option doesn't work

2009-10-02 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32872146/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[jaunty] apt-file --fixed-string option doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest

2009-09-30 Thread Peter Matulis
Is this bug only relevant to disk files?  I am booting guests fine with
raw disks, albeit LVM-based.

Details:

On a Jaunty KVM host I'm using LVM.  When creating a guest I allocated 2
logical volumes (4 GB and 80 GB) to it to be used as raw disks.  With
virt-manager I used the first one (/dev/vda) for installation (with LVM
again; so LVM over LVM) and afterwards added the second one (/dev/vdb).
I also set up LVM on the second disk and created a 40 GB logical volume.
The VM starts fine.

-- 
libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest

2009-09-30 Thread Peter Matulis
Is this bug only relevant to disk files?  I am booting guests fine with
raw disks, albeit LVM-based.

Details:

On a Jaunty KVM host I'm using LVM.  When creating a guest I allocated 2
logical volumes (4 GB and 80 GB) to it to be used as raw disks.  With
virt-manager I used the first one (/dev/vda) for installation (with LVM
again; so LVM over LVM) and afterwards added the second one (/dev/vdb).
I also set up LVM on the second disk and created a 40 GB logical volume.
The VM starts fine.

-- 
libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409583] Re: graphics corruption with karmic

2009-09-25 Thread Peter Matulis
I tried installing karmic alpha6 deskop today on a jaunty kvm host and
upon first boot the display is messed.  It oscillates between a good
display and a corrupted display with a frequency of about 3 seconds.
See screenshot for the corrupted display.  Note that during installation
I specified automatic login.

** Attachment added: 910a6_kvm_display.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32439715/910a6_kvm_display.png

-- 
graphics corruption with karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409583] Re: graphics corruption with karmic

2009-09-25 Thread Peter Matulis
Note that I was installing over a forwarded SSH session (ssh -X host
virt-manager).

-- 
graphics corruption with karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409583] Re: graphics corruption with karmic

2009-09-25 Thread Peter Matulis
The installation of Jaunty i386 desktop succeeds in exactly the same
environment and with the same install method.

On the host:

virt-manager0.6.1-1ubuntu4
kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3
libvirt00.6.1-0ubuntu5.1

Linux kvm-server-2 2.6.28-15-server #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 20:09:37
UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
graphics corruption with karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 411574] Re: [karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio

2009-09-21 Thread Peter Matulis
I'm declaring my problem fixed.  Don't know why.  Update I guess.  I can
now reboot and have sound working.  I can also change applications
(firefox to songbird) and have sound come out.  All this without any
fiddling.

-- 
[karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 429443] [NEW] /usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm

2009-09-14 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kvm

If we want to make the kvm-ok script really useful then it should be
disassociated from the kvm package.  Users should not have to install
kvm and its dependents in order to discover whether they can use kvm.  I
propose we move this script into the base Ubuntu install.

** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
/usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429443
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 429443] [NEW] /usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm

2009-09-14 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kvm

If we want to make the kvm-ok script really useful then it should be
disassociated from the kvm package.  Users should not have to install
kvm and its dependents in order to discover whether they can use kvm.  I
propose we move this script into the base Ubuntu install.

** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
/usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429443
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 411574] Re: [karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio

2009-09-11 Thread Peter Matulis
$ grep Codec /proc/asound/card0/codec*

Codec: Realtek ALC888

-- 
[karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 428227] [NEW] [karmic] virt-goodies package should not exist

2009-09-11 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virt-goodies

This package provides two things:

1. a Python script to convert vmware config files (.vmx) to kvm config files 
(.xml).
2. a libvirt Munin plugin

Installing virt-goodies drags in munin-node which will cause a daemon to
run.  This is silly.

I suggest breaking this into 2 separate packages or adding them to
existing packages.  In the case of the latter, for the plugin there are
the following candidates:

munin-libvirt-plugins
munin-plugins-extra

** Affects: virt-goodies (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- virt-goodies package should not exist
+ [karmic] virt-goodies package should not exist

-- 
[karmic] virt-goodies package should not exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428227
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 420717] Re: wicd creates a default route on eth0 when using bridge

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Matulis
** Changed in: wicd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
wicd creates a default route on eth0 when using bridge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420717
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 422931] [NEW] package apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory `./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or directory

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apturl

Crash.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Sep  1 20:16:26 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: error creating directory 
`./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or directory
Package: apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
SourcePackage: apturl
Title: package apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating 
directory `./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or 
directory
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686

** Affects: apturl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory 
`./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422931
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 422931] Re: package apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory `./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or directory

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31190227/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31190228/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31190229/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31190230/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package apturl 0.3.6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory 
`./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/AptUrl/gtk': No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422931
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 420717] [NEW] wicd creates a default route on eth0 when using bridge

2009-08-28 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: wicd

I'm using a bridge because I'm using KVM:

$ brctl show
bridge name bridge id   STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.00018068ae1d   no  eth0
virbr0  8000.   yes

When I reboot I always get 2 default routes:

default via 192.168.3.101 dev br0  metric 100
default via 192.168.3.101 dev eth0  metric 100

In order to gain connectivity I need to remove the one associated with
eth0:

$ sudo route delete default gw 192.168.3.101

Here is my /etc/network/interfaces file:

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports eth0
bridge_fd 9
bridge_hello 2
bridge_maxage 12
bridge_stp off

** Affects: wicd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
wicd creates a default route on eth0 when using bridge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420717
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest

2009-08-27 Thread Peter Matulis
I had previously worked around this problem by building/patching
libvirt0 and libvirt-bin from the karmic source but my server suddenly
broke again.

-- 
libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 411574] Re: [karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio

2009-08-23 Thread Peter Matulis
I've been getting inconsistent behaviour with my device:

00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio 
Controller (rev 03)
Subsystem: AOPEN Inc. Device 062d

Sometimes upon reboot sound works without changing any configuration.
Sometimes the reboot mutes the speaker and I need to turn up the volume
and it works.  Now I can't get sound at all.

$ uname -a
Linux syrinx 2.6.31-6-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 21 17:48:16 UTC 2009 i686 
GNU/Linux

-- 
[karmic] No sound on Intel 82801H HD Audio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 412617] [NEW] mouse pointer in virt-manager does not sync with guest - hits invisible wall

2009-08-12 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virt-manager

In jaunty (at least) virt-manager presents a mouse pointer that does not
sync properly with the underlying guest.  There is an issue whereby the
pointer hits an invisible wall.  Apparently a workaround is to add a
usb tablet and configure the guest appropriately but there is no guide
on how to do this (especially the latter).  This is supposed to be fixed
upstream [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223805

** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
mouse pointer in virt-manager does not sync with guest - hits invisible wall
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 383068] Re: Creating a new virtual machine does not allow to select ISO image

2009-08-04 Thread Peter Matulis
Do you really expect to have the ISO tunneled over SSH?  I'm not sure
that would be a great thing.  But I agree the dialog should be presented
some other way.

One option is to store the ISO images on the server and launch virt-
manager remotely:

$ ssh -X u...@host virt-manager

-- 
Creating a new virtual machine does not allow to select ISO image
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383068
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 408461] [NEW] image should be removed when a machine is deleted (or at least prompt the user)

2009-08-03 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virt-manager

Currently (0.6.1-1ubuntu4) virt-manager does not remove the image of a
deleted machine.  This is counter-intuitive.  In addition, a server's
disk can quickly fill up due to this behaviour.

The dialog should at least prompt the user:

Do you also want to remove the disk image associated with this virtual
machine?

** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
image should be removed when a machine is deleted (or at least prompt the user)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408461
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322767] Re: MYSQL/BZR - P3: How to avoid that people commit .OTHER/.BASE/.THIS/.moved files?

2009-07-27 Thread Peter Matulis
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
MYSQL/BZR - P3: How to avoid that people commit .OTHER/.BASE/.THIS/.moved files?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322767
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 385596] [NEW] P3: Locked GNOME Panel does not affect gmenu-simple-editor

2009-06-10 Thread Peter Matulis
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Private security bug reported:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

This bug makes it impossible to create a locked down system.  It affects
a support customer (school roll-out scenario) and has a high impact profile.

Summary:

An administrator removes menu items from the Menu Bar with
gmenu-simple-editor (right-click Applications  'Edit Menus').  He/she
then removes command line access and Panel modification:

gconftool-2 \
  --direct \
  --config-source xml:readwrite:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory \
  --type bool --set /desktop/gnome/lockdown/disable_command_line true

gconftool-2 \
  --direct \
  --config-source xml:readwrite:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory \
  --type bool --set /apps/panel/global/locked_down true

This bug allows a user to circumvent all that by simply adding
applications back into the menus because gmenu-simple-editor is not
affected by the gconf /apps/panel/global/locked_down key as it should be.

This bug has been reproduced on Jaunty.

A public bug exists but it has been forgotten (c. 2005):

https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/4712

The listed workaround of changing filesystem permissions for every user
on the system is not acceptable:

$ sudo chown -R root:root ~/.config/menus

QA Team response deadline: June 11, 15:15 UTC

REF:5002005u5kP

 affects ubuntu/gnome-panel
 security yes
 private yes
 subscribe canonical-support
 subscribe canonical-qa

- --
Peter Matulis
Support Team



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkovzXsACgkQkfj47zT3QOi0/wCg1f5wmKfbBSYFVWFZ80VQv5Ex
z9AAoNtF3qED2tearc86a8lwmGgakX1W
=5Z+w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
P3: Locked GNOME Panel does not affect gmenu-simple-editor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385596
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 381689] [NEW] P3: autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty

2009-05-29 Thread Peter Matulis
Private bug reported:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

This issue affects a very large potential customer.  We are currently at
a pre-sales stage and would like to demonstrate our commercial support
services.

Novell has released a patch for this (see next comment) so reproduction
of issue has not been attempted.  No upstream bug can be found at this time.

==

autofs does not seems to exit cleanly on Jaunty.
After users log on the system, /proc/mounts is not being cleared, and a
segfault is shown in the system logs:

[ 5839.284941] automount[19289]: segfault at 7fbf078cdd90 ip
7fbf078cdd90 sp 7fbf037e1118 error 4 in
libresolv-2.9.so[7fbf07d99000+14000]

The issue seems to come from this section in /etc/init.d/umountfs:

do_stop () {
exec 90 /proc/mounts

PROTECTED_MOUNTS=$(sed -n '0,/^\/[^ ]* \/ /p' /proc/mounts)
WEAK_MTPTS= # be gentle, don't use force
REG_MTPTS=
TMPFS_MTPTS=
while read DEV MTPT FSTYPE REST
do

which takes a long while to iterate over 9K+ lines.

Customer has provided auto_master entries from LDAP (attached).

Novell provided a new autofs with the following (RPM) changelog that has
fixed the issue:

==
Distribution: home:cseader:autofs5 / SLE_10

Changelog:

* Tue Apr 14 2009 - csea...@novell.com
- - PTF for bug #410450
  +autofs-dont-kill-process-on-stop.patch

* Wed Apr 01 2009 - mvanc...@suse.de
- - PTF for bug #428674
==


QA Team response deadline: June 1, 15:15 UTC

REF:5002006ENLL

 affects ubuntu/autofs
 private yes
 subscribe canonical-support
 subscribe canonical-qa

- --
Peter Matulis
Support Team


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkof/PIACgkQkfj47zT3QOgfdgCfS8AGTstKIV7dhB8HtMMOT+6d
v4wAn3ehwJFQGcv0mUTL2je5IRmOv3h+
=eC5X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

** Affects: autofs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
P3: autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381689
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 381367] Re: Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty

2009-05-29 Thread Peter Matulis
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 377916] Re: /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf not accessed

2009-05-18 Thread Peter Matulis
Maybe upload lts.conf?

-- 
/var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf not accessed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377916
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 347957] Re: jaunty ltsp client creates /etc/resolv.conf with 000 permissions

2009-05-17 Thread Peter Matulis
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
jaunty ltsp client creates /etc/resolv.conf with 000 permissions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 347957] Re: jaunty ltsp client creates /etc/resolv.conf with 000 permissions

2009-05-17 Thread Peter Matulis
The workaround:

1. Create a script in the chroot whose purpose is to set up proper
permissions on the client resolver file:

$ sudo touch /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/init.d/chmod-resolv.sh

Contents:

---
#! /bin/sh
chmod 644 /etc/resolv.conf
---

2. Rebuild the client image

3. Add options to lts.conf (DNS search domain and nameserver for your
network; and location of above file relative to the chroot)

---
SEARCH_DOMAIN = example.com
DNS_SERVER = 192.168.1.1
RCFILE_01 = /etc/init.d/chmod-resolv.sh
---

-- 
jaunty ltsp client creates /etc/resolv.conf with 000 permissions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347957
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 4712] Re: can still launch the menu editor in locked down mode

2009-05-08 Thread Peter Matulis
The bug still exists in jaunty.

-- 
can still launch the menu editor in locked down mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 89517] Re: Synaptics cPad (touchpad) isnt detected

2009-05-06 Thread Peter Matulis
Hi Leann, I have a support case involving this problem.  They are
running 8.04.  Shall I have them test with a 9.04 live CD?  We just want
to turn the touchpad off.  Is there no other way?

-- 
Synaptics cPad (touchpad) isnt detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89517
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 366327] [NEW] 12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty

2009-04-24 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

After upgrading my system from 8.10 to 9.04 I now have a timeout of
approximately 12 seconds during boot time.  This delay appears right
after the following string is displayed onscreen:

 checking if image is initramfs... it is 

My system is an AOpen MiniPC MP965-DR [1].

It's a Mini-ITX rig with the Intel GM965 chipset.

$ uname -a
Linux syrinx 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 
GNU/Linux

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04

--

[1] http://www.logicsupply.com/products/mp965_dr

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 366327] Re: 12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty

2009-04-24 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939458/dmesg.txt

-- 
12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 366327] Re: 12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty

2009-04-24 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939468/lspci.txt

-- 
12 second timeout when booting after upgrade to Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365537] [NEW] security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher

2009-04-23 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

An dist upgrade from Intrepid to Jaunty resulted in the jaunty-security
pocket being disabled.

This is in an apt-cacher environment.

Pre-upgrade sources.list file:

deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid main 
restricted universe multiverse
deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ 
intrepid-updates main restricted universe multiverse
deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu intrepid-security 
main restricted universe multiverse

Post-upgrade sources.list file:

deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty main 
restricted universe multiverse
deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates 
main restricted universe multiverse
# deb http://cacherhost/apt-cacher?/security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu 
intrepid-security main restricted universe multiverse # disabled on upgrade to 
jaunty

(Last 2 hash lines actually are one line in the file.)

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365537
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365537] Re: security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher

2009-04-23 Thread Peter Matulis

** Attachment added: main.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25887865/main.log

-- 
security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365537
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365537] Re: security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher

2009-04-23 Thread Peter Matulis
The attached log contains the actual name of the cacherhost.

-- 
security pocket disabled during dist upgrade when using apt-cacher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365537
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >