Re: [Bug 512859] Re: X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
It doesn't appear to break with ubuntu 13.04 with KDE as the desktop environment and relatively current patches. Close it. On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 11:12:30PM -, Christopher M. Penalver wrote: > pakraticus, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any > activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If > so, could you please test for this with the latest development release > of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com > /daily-live/current/ . > > If it remains an issue, could you please run the following command in > the development release from a Terminal > (Applications->Accessories->Terminal), as it will automatically gather > and attach updated debug information to this report: > > apport-collect -p linux > > Also, could you please test the latest upstream kernel available following > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds ? It will allow additional > upstream developers to examine the issue. Please do not test the daily > folder, but the one all the way at the bottom. Once you've tested the > upstream kernel, please comment on which kernel version specifically you > tested. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following > tags: > kernel-fixed-upstream > kernel-fixed-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER > > where VERSION-NUMBER is the version number of the kernel you tested. For > example: > kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.11 > > This can be done by clicking on the yellow circle with a black pencil icon > next to the word Tags located at the bottom of the bug description. As well, > please remove the tag: > needs-upstream-testing > > If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the following tags: > kernel-bug-exists-upstream > kernel-bug-exists-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER > > As well, please remove the tag: > needs-upstream-testing > > Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug's > Status as Confirmed. Please let us know your results. Thank you for your > understanding. > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Status: Triaged => Incomplete > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 > > Title: > X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences > > Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > IBM/Lenovo 8305-R8U running Lucid upgraded from karmic this morning. > X will lock every time I bring up AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences. > > > > [ 71.988025] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer > elapsed... GPU hung > > [ 71.988041] render error detected, EIR: 0x > > [ 71.988045] i915: Waking up sleeping processes > > [ 71.988063] [drm:i915_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_wait_request returns > -5 (awaiting 9663 at 9662) > > [ 71.989534] reboot required > > [ 71.995286] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged > > seems to be the relevant bit of dmesg every time. > > ProblemType: Bug > AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. > Architecture: i386 > AudioDevicesInUse: >USERPID ACCESS COMMAND >/dev/snd/controlC0: cdukes 2236 F pulseaudio > CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory > Card0.Amixer.info: >Card hw:0 'I82801DBICH4'/'Intel 82801DB-ICH4 with AD1981B at irq 17' > Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1981B' > Components : 'AC97a:41445374' > Controls : 32 > Simple ctrls : 22 > Date: Tue Jan 26 11:19:05 2010 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 > HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f6bf1c6d-ddee-4404-a9ba-6e340f1f02a6 > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) > IwConfig: >lono wireless extensions. > >eth0 no wireless extensions. > Lsusb: >Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > MachineType: IBM 8305R8U > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-11-generic-pae 2.6.32-11.15 > ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-11-generic-pae > root=UUID=bc69b061-999c-4eca-998b-f1e40618b004 ro quiet splash nomodeset > ProcEnviron: >PATH=(custom, user) >LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-11.15-generic-pae > Regress
Re: [Bug 712188] Re: ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD.
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:45:24PM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > Thanks for the note. And apologies for such a long delay that the fix > is no longer relevant for you. I've already partially commited a fix > via bug 943090 (ie enable CONFIG_SCSI_IBMVSCSI=m). CONFIG_IBMVETH=m is > already set. But I might as well go ahead and fix the rest of this in > case other's would benefit. As such, I've added ibmveth to > debian.master/d-i/modules-powerpc/nic-modules and based on comment #3 > have also enabled CONFIG_SCSI_IBMVFC=m. All three module would need to be in the d-i/modules-powerpc/ > > I'm unable the find the other bug you mentioned which could be closed. > If you have a bug number you could point me at, I'd be glad to get it > closed out. Thanks. Bug 720911 > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Status: In Progress => Fix Committed > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712188 > > Title: > ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD. > > Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Attempted to install ubuntu on an lpar on a pSeries 520 with vtopt virtual > cdrom to vscsi harddrive (and of course veth ethernet). > Attempted both ubuntu-10.10-alternate-powerpc.iso and > ubuntu-10.04-server-powerpc.iso > > yaboot could boot the kernel and the installer started fine. However the > installer was unable to find the cdrom. > RHEL6-ppc4 could install fine on this same LPAR. > Examining lsmod output, ibmveth and ibmvscsic were present on the RHEL > installation. > Upon extracting the contents of linux-image-2.6.35-22-powerpc64-smp on an > intel system, I found that the relevant kernel modules were not present. > > Per discussion on #ubuntu-powerpc with cjwatson. > Please enable CONFIG_IBMVETH and CONFIG_SCSI_IBMVSCSI on powerpc. > add ibmveth to debian.master/d-i/modules-powerpc/nic-modules > > Thanks, > Chris Dukes > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712188/+subscriptions -- Chris Dukes. This message is not confidential. Due to the nature of how email is sent, it's only slightly more private than a postcard. Use GPG if you want correspondence to be confidential and private. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712188 Title: ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 712188] Re: ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD.
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 05:07:23PM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: Actually this can be closed out now. I'm now at an employer that doesn't use IBM POWER hardware. If you choose to pursue this anyways, add the virtual fibre channel driver to the list as well. There should also be a Bug open for the linux kernel in 11.04 being linked such that it is unbootable on POWER. It can be marked as closed as well. -- Chris Dukes. This message is not confidential. Due to the nature of how email is sent, it's only slightly more private than a postcard. Use GPG if you want correspondence to be confidential and private. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712188 Title: ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/712188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744451] Re: Needs automount support
Chroot remains the least painful way for me to use i386 debs on an amd64 system. Here is 21automount tidied up for natty. It should just automagically work for autofs users. Hopefully it doesn't blow things up for non-autofs users. ** Attachment added: "/etc/schroot/setup.d/21autofs to automatically provide autofs within a schroot chroot session." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/schroot/+bug/744451/+attachment/2653249/+files/21automount -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744451 Title: Needs automount support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/schroot/+bug/744451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744451] Re: Needs automount support
** Attachment added: "automount script for schroot setup.d" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744451/+attachment/1950795/+files/21automount -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744451 Title: Needs automount support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744451] [NEW] Needs automount support
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: schroot Feature request with code for implementation of feature. Background. Automount doesn't work properly with bind mounts. Starting automount within a schroot does not work as expected. As automount map scripts may be updating iptables, running the actual automount under a schroot may be a poor idea anyways. And other users have struggled to get automount to work within schroot, I wrote a setup.d to handle automount with a schroot. Attached is a script that handles those needs. Script handles setup-start and setup-stop for persistant named schroots. Naming conventions may need to be tidied up. Documentation needs to be provided. Thanks, Chris Dukes ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: schroot 1.4.7-1ubuntu0.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.49-server 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 28 13:50:51 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: schroot ** Affects: schroot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744451 Title: Needs automount support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720911] Re: Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520
Jeremy, Apport requires linux and a shell to be running. Because the install/powerpc64/vmlinux is a shared object instead of an executable object, yaboot declares it to be an invalid object and I can't get past yaboot. The results from the 2011Feb23 natty-alternate-powerpc.iso boot: expert-powerpc64 Please wait, loading kernel... /install/powerpc64/vmlinux: Not a valid ELF image And examining /install/powerpc64/vmlinux /tmp/mnt/install/powerpc64/vmlinux: ELF 64-bit MSB shared object, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped I'm fairly certain the version of yaboot on the CD image doesn't support loading shared objects. Also, kernel mainline is useless at this point unless someone wants to post detailed instructions on how build a powerpc install CD from a Debian chroot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720911 Title: Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720911] Re: Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520
To further clarify. The non-working natty vmlinux is a shared object. The working lucid image is an executable object. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720911 Title: Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720911] [NEW] Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520
Public bug reported: This server has successfully booted /install/powerpc64/vmlinux from ubuntu 10.04 and 10.10 (Only to be thwarted by lack of veth and vscsi support (Bug 712188). In seeing if the problem has been resolved in natty yet, I pulled the February 16th daily ISO build. yaboot starts successfully. Then I have the following failure. boot: expert-powerpc64 Please wait, loading kernel... /install/powerpc64/vmlinux: Not a valid ELF image It would appear that the creation of vmlinux was slightly botched. $ file /tmp/1*4/install/powerpc64/vmlinux /tmp/10.04/install/powerpc64/vmlinux: ELF 64-bit MSB executable, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped /tmp/11.04/install/powerpc64/vmlinux: ELF 64-bit MSB shared object, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720911 Title: Cannot boot Feb 16th natty-server-powerpc.iso on pSeries mod 520 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712188] [NEW] ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD.
Public bug reported: Attempted to install ubuntu on an lpar on a pSeries 520 with vtopt virtual cdrom to vscsi harddrive (and of course veth ethernet). Attempted both ubuntu-10.10-alternate-powerpc.iso and ubuntu-10.04-server-powerpc.iso yaboot could boot the kernel and the installer started fine. However the installer was unable to find the cdrom. RHEL6-ppc4 could install fine on this same LPAR. Examining lsmod output, ibmveth and ibmvscsic were present on the RHEL installation. Upon extracting the contents of linux-image-2.6.35-22-powerpc64-smp on an intel system, I found that the relevant kernel modules were not present. Per discussion on #ubuntu-powerpc with cjwatson. Please enable CONFIG_IBMVETH and CONFIG_SCSI_IBMVSCSI on powerpc. add ibmveth to debian.master/d-i/modules-powerpc/nic-modules Thanks, Chris Dukes ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712188 Title: ibmveth and ivmvscsic missing from ramdisk of ubuntu for PPC CD. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524434] Re: Lucid Alpha 2 server iso install fails at bootloader in KVM
kvm command line as generated by libvirt-bin
/usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.11 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp
2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name BT -uuid 7e4c5cc4-f077-e52e-6d2d-
f865637e87df -nodefaults -chardev
socket,id=monitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/BT.monitor,server,nowait
-mon chardev=monitor,mode=readline -rtc base=utc -boot cd -device
lsi,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6 -drive file=/local/vimages/isos/ubuntu
/lucid-alternate-amd64.iso,if=none,media=cdrom,id=drive-ide0-1-0 -device
ide-drive,bus=ide.1,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-1-0,id=ide0-1-0 -drive
file=/dev/greasy-vg/bt,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,boot=on,format=raw
-device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id
=virtio-disk0 -device
e1000,vlan=0,id=net0,mac=54:52:00:33:9c:2d,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -net
tap,fd=46,vlan=0,name=hostnet0 -chardev pty,id=serial0 -device isa-
serial,chardev=serial0 -usb -vnc 127.0.0.1:0 -k en-us -vga cirrus
-device ES1370,id=sound0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -device virtio-balloon-
pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
Some history and quirks.
1) This system has had the virtual disk swapped to SCSI and back to
virtio.
2) grub-pc postinst fails after a switch from SCSI to virtio with cannot find
/dev/disk/by-id/
(There is *NO* /dev/disk/by-id with virtio)
3) After purging grub-pc and reinstalling it, the postinst can no longer
find a disk where grub should be installed.
4) grub-install --recheck /dev/vda works just fine
Thoughts.
1) udev persistent storage rules probably need to match the [vs]d*[!0-9]
wildmat instead of sd*[!0-9].
2) Until udev is fixed, it would be pleasant if grub-pc.postinst would fallback
to /dev/disk/by-uuid.
I think this does it.
available_ids()
{
local id path diskby
if [ "$cached_available_ids" ]; then
echo "$cached_available_ids"
return
fi
for diskby in /dev/disk/by-id /dev/disk/by-uuid; do
[ -d "$diskby" ] && break
done
cached_available_ids="$(
for path in "$diskby"/* ; do
[ -e "$path" ] || continue
printf '%s %s\n' "$path" "$(readlink -f "$path")"
done | sort -k2 -s -u | cut -d' ' -f1
)"
echo "$cached_available_ids"
}
3) Yes, I know testing is a pain, but it's probably worth checking that install
works with kvm with all three possible ways of providing disk.
--
Lucid Alpha 2 server iso install fails at bootloader in KVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524434
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)
Chris Rogers, #3) With DRI disabled, I have only experienced the wedge condition a couple times when I switch VTs while a GL application is running. Those have only occurred while unintentionally booted to a backlevel 2.6.32 kernel. -- MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541492] Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?)
Chris Rogers, The following is my current kludge around. An xorg.conf only containing. Section "Device" Identifier "my-self-configured-device" Driver "intel" Option "DRI" "Off" EndSection GL apps still work, but are painfully slow, but it beats not working at all. The above kludge was actually derived from the troubleshooting documentation. At this point in time I am seeing the system crash/lock to the affected system is no longer on the network 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01) Subsystem: IBM Device 0267 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 Memory at 8800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Memory at 8000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Capabilities: Kernel modules: i915 With i915.modeset=0 added to the kernel command line I keep seeing white vertical bars flash across the top half-third of the screen and iterations of [ 167.472853] [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns -5 (awaiting 1770 at 1733) [ 169.524015] [drm:i915_gem_idle] *ERROR* hardware wedged [ 170.647918] [drm:i915_gem_entervt_ioctl] *ERROR* Reenabling wedged hardware, good luck [ 171.008012] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung [ 171.008023] render error detected, EIR: 0x in dmesg. And the machine stays on the network with the extra parameter. The problem happens with both 2:2.9.1-3ubuntu2~gomyhr1~clipsolids and 2:2.9.1-3ubuntu1 on 2.6.32-19-generic. If someone wouldn't mind reminding me how to setup a serial console for debugging this kind of annoyance I'll gladly collect as much debug information as upstream wants. My two cents of things to do before Lucid ships are 1) Prominently include in the release notes that xserver-xorg-video-intel is broken. 2) Prominently include in the release notes the work around xorg.conf. 3) Repeat #1 and #2 in a recognizeably named file in /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-video-intel along with this bug tracking number and upstream's bug tracking number. If someone is feeling very creative, try having the crash hooks install that stub xorg.conf and reboot the system. -- MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512859] Re: X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
Stil broken with 2.6.32-16-generic-pae, libdrm-intel1 2.4.18-1ubuntu2, xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1ubuntu10. [ 80.024014] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung [ 80.024025] render error detected, EIR: 0x [ 80.024029] i915: Waking up sleeping processes [ 80.024045] [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns -5 (awaiting 2957 at 2956) [ 80.024339] reboot required [ 80.026461] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 82.535893] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 83.402154] [drm] DAC-5: set mode 1600x1200 17 [ 85.288150] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 85.964173] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 86.636179] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 87.315971] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 87.995995] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 88.629415] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 134.434400] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 135.054138] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 135.664595] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 136.276598] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged [ 136.887902] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged On the bright side, it spits back to a "Low graphics mode" dialog. But after disabling DRI in xorg.conf, X still won't restart without a reboot -- X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526009] Re: krb5-utils kinit will not auth against AIX's dce secd
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39559816/Dependencies.txt -- krb5-utils kinit will not auth against AIX's dce secd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526009] [NEW] krb5-utils kinit will not auth against AIX's dce secd
Public bug reported: We use DCE on AIX to provide our Kerberos5 KDCs. This configuration has worked fine for quite a while with heimdal-clients providing kinit and openssh-client has been able to successfully GSSAPI authenticate. Since the 1.8 alpha version released on February 18th, ssh fails with "Cannot find ticket for requested realm." Kinit, as provided from krb5-user fails with kinit: KDC has no support for encryption type while getting initial credentials This makes kerberos unuseable in my environment. For now the machine has been reverted to 1.7 beta 3 as grabbed from karmic. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Feb 22 15:45:33 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: libkrb5-3 1.7dfsg~beta3-1ubuntu0.4 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-13.18-generic-pae SourcePackage: krb5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-13-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- krb5-utils kinit will not auth against AIX's dce secd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512859] Re: X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
Still broken with http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v2.6.32.8/linux- image-2.6.32-02063208-generic_2.6.32-02063208_i386.deb as well as http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.33-rc7/linux- image-2.6.33-020633rc7-generic_2.6.33-020633rc7_i386.deb [ 98.848025] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung [ 98.848038] render error detected, EIR: 0x [ 98.848041] i915: Waking up sleeping processes [ 98.848058] [drm:i915_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_wait_request returns -5 (awaiting 11195 at 11194) [ 98.855069] reboot required [ 98.872486] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged appears to be the relevant part of the dmesg. If anything else needs to be retrieved and added to the bug report, just let me know. -- X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512859] Re: X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
Problem was reproduceable with 2.6.33-020633rc5-generic and 2.6.32-02063206-generic. xorg-edge added to the mix lead to X not starting at all. Purged packages from PPA and then reinstalled ubuntu-desktop and system revered to normal lock behavior upon starting a GL app. Problem goes away with an Option "DRI" "Off" in xorg.conf, but GL is somewhat unusable. -- X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512859] Re: X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
** Attachment added: "dri debug steps as directed from a similar bug on amd64." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414430/dri_debug-20100126.tgz ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414432/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414433/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414434/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414435/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414443/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3841/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414445/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414447/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414451/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414452/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414455/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414456/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414457/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414459/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414460/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414463/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38414466/WifiSyslog.txt -- X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512859] [NEW] X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences
Public bug reported: IBM/Lenovo 8305-R8U running Lucid upgraded from karmic this morning. X will lock every time I bring up AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences. > [ 71.988025] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer > elapsed... GPU hung > [ 71.988041] render error detected, EIR: 0x > [ 71.988045] i915: Waking up sleeping processes > [ 71.988063] [drm:i915_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_wait_request returns -5 > (awaiting 9663 at 9662) > [ 71.989534] reboot required > [ 71.995286] [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Execbuf while wedged seems to be the relevant bit of dmesg every time. ProblemType: Bug AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: cdukes 2236 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'I82801DBICH4'/'Intel 82801DB-ICH4 with AD1981B at irq 17' Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1981B' Components : 'AC97a:41445374' Controls : 32 Simple ctrls : 22 Date: Tue Jan 26 11:19:05 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f6bf1c6d-ddee-4404-a9ba-6e340f1f02a6 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: IBM 8305R8U Package: linux-image-2.6.32-11-generic-pae 2.6.32-11.15 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-11-generic-pae root=UUID=bc69b061-999c-4eca-998b-f1e40618b004 ro quiet splash nomodeset ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-11.15-generic-pae Regression: No RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.28 Reproducible: Yes RfKill: SourcePackage: linux TestedUpstream: No Uname: Linux 2.6.32-11-generic-pae i686 dmi.bios.date: 05/10/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: IBM dmi.bios.version: 24KT55AUS dmi.board.name: IBM dmi.board.vendor: IBM dmi.chassis.asset.tag: � dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIBM:bvr24KT55AUS:bd05/10/2005:svnIBM:pn8305R8U:pvr:rvnIBM:rnIBM:rvr:cvnIBM:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: 8305R8U dmi.sys.vendor: IBM ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid needs-upstream-testing -- X locks after selecting AntSpotlight in Screensaver Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366339] Re: gnome-terminal does not save information on multiple windows/tabs open
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939743/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939744/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939745/ProcStatus.txt -- gnome-terminal does not save information on multiple windows/tabs open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366339] [NEW] gnome-terminal does not save information on multiple windows/tabs open
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal More headaches from the 2008 decision to change the session management protocols... Fortunately, upstream has fixed this in gnome-terminal 2.26.1. Unfortunately, the launchpad integration patches from the current version don't apply cleanly to 2.26.1. Unfortunately gnome-terminal 2.26.1 isn't included in Jaunty yet :-). A build of gnome-terminal 2.26.1 on jaunty beta with everything else gnome left at 2.26.0 worked fine and as expected until jaunty rc issues with xserver-xorg kept me from having a visible display under KVM with -vga std and -vga vmware. 1) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 2) $ apt-cache policy gnome-terminal gnome-terminal: Installed: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) gnome-terminal to remember I had more than one window open after setting "Remember settings on logout" in startup applications. 4) One gnome-terminal window opened. Thanks, Chris Dukes ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal Package: gnome-terminal 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-terminal Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-server i686 ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- gnome-terminal does not save information on multiple windows/tabs open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338219] Re: x not starting in kvm with std vga
Hi, I'm seeing this breakage with xserver-xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 I'm not seeing this breakage with xserver-xorg 1:7.4~ubuntu16 Attached is the lspci output from the VM with ubuntu 9.04 beta installed. ** Attachment added: "lspci-std" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25681365/lspci-std -- x not starting in kvm with std vga https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338219 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 351962] Re: jaunty session does not properly restore Terminal
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 249373 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:56:20PM -, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: I suspect that this is actually a duplicate of 333603, an indication that gnome-terminal in jaunty-beta is backlevel, or a new bug. There is upstream gnome bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575308 which indicates that it should be resolved as of gnome-terminal rev 3387. See comments 18 and 19 on 575308. > > ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 249373 >gnome-session storing broken since intrepid > > -- > jaunty session does not properly restore Terminal > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351962 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug (via bug 249373). > > Status in “metacity” source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: metacity > > Jaunty's Beta session manager does not properly restore the Terminal. I've > opened several Terminals, maximised them and placed in different workspaces. > Selected the option to automatically save sessions and logged out. After the > login, only one Terminal was launched in normal size (not maximised). A very > annoying bug as I have to open about a dozen of Terminals in various desktops > every time I login. Surely I am not the only one that has to do it with every > login! > > My system is Jaunty Beta amd64 > > Description: Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) > Release: 9.04 > > apt-cache policy metacity > metacity: > Installed: 1:2.25.144-0ubuntu2 > Candidate: 1:2.25.144-0ubuntu2 > Version table: > *** 1:2.25.144-0ubuntu2 0 > 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > > updated all packages today -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- jaunty session does not properly restore Terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333603] Re: gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:23:26AM -, Chris Coulson wrote: > Thank you for your bug report, but why do you think that this is not a > duplicate of bug 249373? This functionality has not been ported to the > new gnome-session codebase yet, so bug 249373 still applies to Jaunty. > To me, this problem looks like bug 249373, unless you can explain why > you think it isn't Furthermore, upstream thinks it's a defect with gnome-terminal http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575308 -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333603] Re: gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:13:13PM -, Chris Coulson wrote: > gnome-session in Jaunty has preliminary support for session saving again > now (using the patch linked from that upstream report), so this is > clearly a limitation in gnome-terminal now. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575307 for gedit. Let me know if you want me to open another one, or wait until there is a final status on 552387. There's also a bug with metacity not saving window position that Vincent Untz is aware of, but there doesn't seem to be a number for it yet. I'd go digging for it, but going through window manager bugs tends to raise my blood pressure a bit much. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome-session storing broken in intrepid
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:16:04PM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Could preople stop this rant there, that's not constructive, the choice > taken for intrepid was wrong but everybody does mistake and now is time > to get things fixed rather than blaming the distro team or GNOME again > and again for the error > > I've just uploaded a patched version to jaunty which restore session > storing, it's late in the cycle for GNOME (but should not be an easy for > jaunty), some applications are know to be buggy but session storing > should basically work and it should prompt again for not saved work in > gedit for example and don't display a firefox incorrect closing prompt > on next opening > > comments on the new jaunty version are appreciated 2.25.92-0ubuntu2 gnome-session 2.25.91-0ubuntu2 gnome-terminal gnome-terminal still doesn't remember that I have multiple open when I logout. Time to dust off the bug I put in that gnome-terminal and nautilus still can't be arsed to speak the new protocol. I'm not thrilled with the prompting on gedit, but my specific complaint looks more like a gedit bug. But as long as gnome-terminal doesn't start prompting or nvi doesn't start prompting, I don't care... -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome-session storing broken in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome-session storing broken in intrepid
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package gnome-session - 2.25.92-0ubuntu1 And whoever claimed this didn't do squat for regression testing. sequence login. system->preferences->startup programs->options-> check automatically remember running applications when logging out click remember currently running application. Start a gnome-terminal logout log in again. gnome-terminal starts Okay, good. ctrl-shift-n within the new gnome-terminal to open a second one. logout log in again only one gnome-terminal open. For giggles, places->desktop logout log in again only one gnome-terminal open. So, we're back to the other bug I just recently opened. "The developers of gnome-terminal and nautilus can't be arsed to eat the new gnome session management dogfood." > > --- > gnome-session (2.25.92-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low > > * New upstream version (LP: #337386): > - Re-introduce support for session saving (LP: #249373). > - Ensure treeview is included in a scrolled window with a > shadow in the inhibit dialog. > - Use system-log-out icon instead of deprecated gnome-logout. > - Fix logout dialogs not being themed (LP: #320921). > * 80_new_upstream_session_dialog.patch: > - Updated so that it applies again. > * 98_autotools.patch: > - Recreate for new upstream version. > > -- Chris CoulsonTue, 03 Mar 2009 > 18:53:58 + > > ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) >Status: Triaged => Fix Released > > -- > gnome-session storing broken in intrepid > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The GNOME 2 Session Manager: Confirmed > Status in “gnome-session” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > Status in “gnome-session” source package in Fedora: In Progress > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: gnome-session > > The latest gnome-session in Ubuntu/intrepid does not restore saved session at > all. It does not start window manager (I'm not using craps like compiz or > metacity, I'm using openbox, but /usr/bin/gnome-wm correctly starts the > openbox). > > I have gnome-session: 2.23.4.1-0ubuntu1 > > I did gnome-session-save before quiting the session but nothing is restored. > Moreover, I use save session on exit option. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome-session storing broken in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333603] Re: gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:23:26AM -, Chris Coulson wrote: > Thank you for your bug report, but why do you think that this is not a > duplicate of bug 249373? This functionality has not been ported to the > new gnome-session codebase yet, so bug 249373 still applies to Jaunty. > To me, this problem looks like bug 249373, unless you can explain why > you think it isn't The underlying cause is that the two application still speak the old session management protocol. However, as they are two prominent gnome applications and at the same version as gnome-session, they should be speaking the same session management protocol. Until they do, it should be documented as a known issue for any distribution that ships gnome 2.24 or later. By documenting it as a known issue I and other users can evaluate whether to stay with ubuntu 8.04, migrate to KDE, or migrate back to 1990 vintange .xinitrc and .xsession files. With non-gnome applications that use the old session management protocol (IE KDE apps, firefox), I would fully expect for a bug report to be flagged as a defect. Until the developers of gnome-terminal and nautilus either eat the gnome 2.24 session management dogfood, or publicly declare that they won't eat the current session management dogfood, it is a technical defect in those applications. In the meantime, it would help that the separate issues 1) Current gnome-session does not support the legacy protocol. 2) Current gnome applications do not support the current session-protocol. If #2 is successfully addressed, there is the opportunity for the new session protocol to become the standard making #1 a non-issue. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333603] [NEW] gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal This is almost certainly an upstream bug. This is not a duplicate of 249373. However, this was found while checking to see if 249373 still appeared in jaunty alpha 4. When Gnome moved to their new session protocol for the version of gnome shipped in intrepid, it was to be expected that applications such as gnome-terminal and nautilus would be delayed in actually making use of the new session protocol. However, at this point in time that is not the case. On a fresh install of jaunty alpha 4 1) Open gnome-terminal 2) run gnome-session-save 3) Logout 4) Log back in again does not produce the expected result that the gnome-terminal window is opened on the next login. A retry of 1) Open gnome-terminal 2) Open places->Home Folder 3) System->Preferences->Sessions->Options 3.1) Click automatically remember running applications when logging out 3.2) Click on remember currently running applications. 4) Close 5) Restart 6) Log in again also does not produce the expected results of the gnome-terminal and nautilus window being open upon the next login. This bug is to note that gnome-terminal and nautilus do not abide by the new gnome session management protocol. It would be appreciated if this upstream bug would be noted in the Known Issues section of http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/alpha4 as issues with fglrx and xorg are noted. gnome-terminal is 2.25.5-0ubuntu2 nautilus is 2.25.4-0ubuntu1 Thanks, Chris Dukes ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-terminal does not honor new gnome session protocol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:33:56AM -, Kees Kuip wrote: > At the top of the page I see a link to bugzilla of gnome: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536685 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387 is probably the better bug to track. 536685 refers more to a bug in migrating to the new version. > > Is this the description of the upstream bug? > If it is so then I think a wrong bug is reported! > Also I don't see any links back from that bug to this thread. So that > upstream can see what the problems are. Upstream is well aware of it. If you follow that bug you may even find some amusing bits. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 255658] Re: disk-manager crashed with IOError in copyfile()
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:52:51AM -, Dimitrios Symeonidis wrote: To be honest, I really don't care if this is resolved because I won't be using Intrepid until gnome-session 2.24.x resolves saving session on legacy apps that are only aware of xsmp for session management (Like gnome-terminal 2.24.x). However, I'm willing to play bug whackamole on this. > this bug report has collected 57 duplicates, but has surprisingly little > information in it... > i installed disk-manager to test it, and it doesn't crash on my system... > this is ubuntu 8.10 32-bit, disk-manager 1.0.1-2 > > could this be a 64-bit problem? i'm 64bit at home, will test also > there... > > can the reporters please report whether they have ntfs partitions on the > system? thank you Yes there is an NTFS partition on this system. > > in the meantime, i will start going through the duplicate reports to > collect some info, will post it here... The only reason this was reported was because Intrepid added the spiffy feature of adding automatic bug reporting on any program that crashed. > > -- > disk-manager crashed with IOError in copyfile() > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255658 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug. > > Status in Disk Manager: New > Status in “disk-manager” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: disk-manager > > this crash appears then i haven't start the program > > ProblemType: Crash > Architecture: i386 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 > ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/disk-manager > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 > Package: disk-manager 1.0.1-2 > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python2.5 -OOt /usr/bin/disk-manager --check > ProcEnviron: > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/disk-manager', '--check'] > SourcePackage: disk-manager > Title: disk-manager crashed with IOError in copyfile() > Uname: Linux 2.6.26-5-generic i686 > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev > video -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- disk-manager crashed with IOError in copyfile() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:01:56PM -, Mozg wrote: > I agree that this bug should be a high priority fix as many users of > previous releases are used to this option and expect it to work in the > next release. I have this problem and it is _very_ annoying! Complaining to the ubuntu bug tracker about a serious defect in upstream gnome won't get anything fixed. However, you might want to complain that there is no mention of the gnome 2.24.x design problem mentioned in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseNotes As for the bug with upstream... Start following http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387 I strongly suspect that Sebastien is already tracking this upstream bug and will apply the fixes from upstream as soon as they are available. Hopefully Gnome upstream will have a fix shortly after the 30th. Otherwise, hopefully Gnome upstream will fix it by April :-). -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:02:10PM -, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Yes, the firefox is just killed. Anyway, gnome-session-properties > complains that saving session is not implemented yet :) And I don't see > any session file under ~/.gnome2, ~/.gnome2_private, ~/.config the new session protocol has each app that supports it (Which as far as I can tell are the apps in gnome-session and nothing else) directs each application to store session information in gconf2. Backwards compatibility still remains on the todo list. > > -- > gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The GNOME 2 Session Manager: New > Status in “gnome-session” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: gnome-session > > The latest gnome-session in Ubuntu/intrepid does not restore saved session at > all. It does not start window manager (I'm not using craps like compiz or > metacity, I'm using openbox, but /usr/bin/gnome-wm correctly starts the > openbox). > > I have gnome-session: 2.23.4.1-0ubuntu1 > > I did gnome-session-save before quiting the session but nothing is restored. > Moreover, I use save session on exit option. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249373] Re: gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 04:06:03AM -, Johne wrote: > This isn't something that Ubuntu can really fix anyhow. Only Gnome's > developers should be willing to spend the time to fix, not Ubuntu's. Well, there's a fix, but at this point it would be a mess. Revert to 2.22.x GNOME. Upgrade to 2.24.x GNOME when either 1) gnome-session is able to properly handle the legacy session protocol. (Preferable, breaks the fewest apps). 2) The new protocol is adopted by KDE as well and a significant number of apps support the new protocol. (Acceptable, but can lead to a few annoyances). 3) A significant portion of gnome-core 2.24.x supports the new protocol. Then there is politeness. Include in /usr/share/doc/gnome-session a file indicating that GNOME upstream broke backwards compatibility with the old session management protocol and why it was considered a good idea for ubuntu to upgrade anyways. Being able to have applications automatically start up when I log in where I want them has been a standard part of my computing experience for 18 years now. Being able to do that without having to drag out 'vi' has been part of my experience for 7 or 8 years now. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 267141] Re: suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 06:11:24PM -, hyperair wrote: > That would be a bad idea. If we want uswsusp to work with pm-utils by default > (if uswsusp is > installed) then no changes need to be done. But what James Westby and the > rest of them want to do is > allow uswsusp to be installed, and pm-utils doesn't use it unless you > explicitly install AND enable > it. Well this effect could be achieved better through the use of debconf, but > honestly, too many > prompts by debconf isn't pretty, and should be kept to a minimum. People use uswsusp either because 1) It's legacy on a box that was upgraded from hardy to intrepid where uswsusp was installed for whatever reason. (How I encountered this). 2) They followed feisty or gutsy vintage instructions. 3) Their hardware does not work properly with the kernel sleep and hibernate modules for pm-utils. #1 and #2 could probably withstand applying the rolled up newspaper treatment to the user. #3 indicates attempting to conceal a defect in the pm-utils package and MAYBE it's worthwhile to report the defect in pm-utils. Right now the crux of the pm-utils defect is that it assumes that the module for hibernate should also be the module for sleep. On debian this makes sense as uswsusp provides both hibernate and sleep. This is a side effect of the revision of the pm-utils code to be more modular. Upstream should be notified of the problem in logic prior to distributing a fix for intrepid. (I apologize for switching between sleep and suspend... I'm trying to maintain the same inconsistancy as the pm-utils modules). > > And also, I agree that if we don't have s2ram even built in the uswsusp > package, then we should at > least have a separate package with just s2ram in it. Assuming s2ram is the right solution. At this point in the game, intrepid is alpha. The prescribed configuration is pm-utils without uswsusp. If pm-utils fails on suspend or hibernate with uswsusp on your hardware, the ubuntu developers need to know. If you installed uswsusp to resolve a hibernate problem and uswsusp did, maybe the fix is to change the logic in pm-utils instead of bringing back s2ram. If the logic on pm-utils is improved to separate the configured module for sleep from module for hibernate, the long term solution might be for pm-utils to provide suspend and hibernate blacklists, uswsusp to provide suspend and hibernate blacklists, and tuxonice to provide suspend and hibernate blacklists and for pm-is-supported to provide a --verbose or --recommends flag that indicates which module is being used for suspend, hibernate, or suspend-hybrid, whether it was hard set or determined from absence from blacklists, and if it's blacklisted the next priority package. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 267141] Re: suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:52:34PM -, James Westby wrote: > > I believe this is incorrect, adding a file to /etc/pm/config.d/ will > allow them to use it. Which could be supplied by uswsusp. Which could then be managed through debconf for uswsusp. And then there would be grounds to have a uswsusp-s2ram package that should probably nag and complain that the user really should open a bug against pm-utils if they must use the package. -- Chris Dukes "In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father" -- suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 267141] Re: suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
Looking at this more closely, yes my suggested patch disables
pm-utils use of uswsusp on ubuntu, unless someone installed
the debian uswsusp package.
However, the current behavior is to disable the use of suspend when
ubuntu uswsusp is installed.
The root of this problem appears to be duplication of the check_suspend
and check_hibernate functions between modules.d/*, pm-is-supported, and
pm-utils when our SLEEP_MODULE does not have to be the same
as our hibernate module.
My thoughts without code are.
1) the functions for each module should be uniquely named based on the
module.
module.d/uswsusp's check_suspend should be uswsusp_check_suspend
2) pm-utils should source all files in modules.d/*
3) pm-utils should have something like a checkit() and doit() functions
something like
checkit() {
local rc=1
for module in $modules; do
${module}_check_$1
rc=$?
[ "$rc" == 0 ] && break
done
return $rc
}
doit() {
checkit $1; rc=$?
[ "$rc" == 0 ] && ${module}_check_$1
}
But that needs to be floated upstream
--
Chris Dukes
"In cynicism she's about 35" -- Terry Pratchett's "Hog Father"
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249373] Re: gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
Sebatien, Would you be kind enough to point us to the mailing list or WIKI that discusses these upstream issues? Per the August 8th changelog entry within the gnome-session source indicates this was fixed. Traffic on the desktop-devel-list is somewhat sparse after the initial proposal to revamp gnome-session to dbus instead of xsmp. Traffic to gnome-list concerning the problem seems to be 2.22 oriented. Nothing is mentioned in the Gnome 2.24 showstopper review. A quick review of the desktop files generated for gnome-terminal indicate that gnome-terminal does not currently have AutostartCondition nor X-GNOME-Autostart-*. Reading through the proposal thread http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-June/msg00210.html indicates that xsmp was completely dropped in favor of the new session protocol with no concern over legacy apps, including core gnome apps such as gnome-terminal This is not "known upstream issues." This is "This will never work for legacy applications." A warning of some sort in /usr/share/doc/gnome-session directing annoyed users to the guilty parties would have been appreciated. -- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274055] [NEW] gnome-session-save doesn't actually save the session.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session I have noticed this new behavior since upgrading from hardy to intrepid. Behavior persists with gnome-session 2.24.0-0ubuntu1, but I suspect that it occurs with any version since the session moved from ~/.gnome2/session to gconf. This problem occurs with an account created before the upgrade and an account created after the upgrade. I presently do not have the resources to determine if the problem occurs on a system freshly installed with intrepid.Description: Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 gnome-session: Installed: 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I expected gnome-session-save to save that I have several gnome- terminals open as well as a browser and restart them upon logging out and in again. ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-session-save doesn't actually save the session. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264311] Re: pm-utils stoped working in Intrepid
Works on a T61 with some fixing. Fixes have been forwarded on to another
pm-utils thread along with a patch.
A few things I've found.
1) gnome-power-manager's determination as to whether or not a system may
suspend or hibernate appears to eventually depend on pm-is-supported --suspend
and pm-is-supported --hibernate. 'sh -x /usr/bin/pm-is-supported
{--suspend,--hibernate}; echo $?'can give some indication as to what it is
doing.
2) The SLEEP_MODE=auto leads to an incorrect test for suspend if uswsusp is
installed. Either remove uswsusp, or change pm-functions to have it check for
s2ram instead of s2disk for uswsusp mode.
3) The straight kernel mode suspend has been a crap shoot for me. Yesterday my
T61 was happier with s2ram from debian sid's uswsusp-0.8-1 rebuilt on intrepid.
This morning that lead to network-manager not being able to recognize the
return of the network.
4) Once you fix your system so that pm-is-supported reports accurately and
behaves correctly, you will need to have dbus reload its information.
5) My system is back to logout and switchuser on the logout app, and suspend on
the shutdown app.
--
pm-utils stoped working in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267141] Re: suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
The problem appears when uswsusp is installed because of an incorrect test for the use of uswsusp for suspend for SLEEP_MODE=auto. This is what ships in /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions # Try userspace software suspend if [ -c /dev/snapshot ] && command_exists s2disk ; then SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp" fi This is what should ship # Try userspace software suspend if [ -c /dev/snapshot ] && command_exists s2ram ; then SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp" fi The following patch to 10-sleep-mdule-auto-detection.patch appears to resolve the problem --- pm-utils-1.1.2.4/debian/patches/10-sleep-module-auto-detection.patch.orig 2008-09-18 13:58:46.0 -0400 +++ pm-utils-1.1.2.4/debian/patches/10-sleep-module-auto-detection.patch 2008-09-18 11:43:16.0 -0400 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ + SLEEP_MODULE="kernel" + + # Try userspace software suspend -+ if [ -c /dev/snapshot ] && command_exists s2disk ; then ++ if [ -c /dev/snapshot ] && command_exists s2ram ; then + SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp" + fi + However... My thinkpad T61 appears to now get upset with kernel suspend. So I built debian sid's uswsup-0.8-1 which provides s2ram. And everything appears to be happy now. Now off to find out why we're still on a 15 month old version of uswsusp, and why splashy.h has gboolean instead of int. -- suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
