[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug
Regarding #2: You're right. I've tried on identical 12.04 LTS 64bit. Vulnurable on Xeon E5654 Not vulnurable on Xeon E5345 Both machines are paravirtualizes Xen DomU, so it looks like the system is vulnurable by the availability of sse4 only. It looks like the existence of Xen virtualizationlayer doesn't matter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371 Title: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1011371/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1011602] Re: mysql login possible without knowing password
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1011371 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371 Forgot to add the original post which made me aware of the bug: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q2/493 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011602 Title: mysql login possible without knowing password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1011602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug
Regarding #2: You're right. I've tried on identical 12.04 LTS 64bit. Vulnurable on Xeon E5654 Not vulnurable on Xeon E5345 Both machines are paravirtualizes Xen DomU, so it looks like the system is vulnurable by the availability of sse4 only. It looks like the existence of Xen virtualizationlayer doesn't matter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371 Title: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1011371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997471] [NEW] package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist
Public bug reported: Sorry, I don't have further information. It's just after upgrading from oneiric to precise, my desktop startup with a Problem occured Messagewindow. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic-pae 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 AptOrdering: linux-base: Install linux-base: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Mon May 7 10:05:30 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Entpacken von linux-base (aus .../linux-base_3.4_all.deb) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-base_3.4_all.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist ErrorMessage: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: linux-base Title: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-26 (13 days ago) ** Affects: linux-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997471 Title: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools- common 3.2.0-24.38 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/997471/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997471] Re: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools-common 3.2.0-24.38 ist
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997471 Title: package linux-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/perf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket linux-tools- common 3.2.0-24.38 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/997471/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04
Regarding #12 I'ld also suggest, to wait for an upstream solution. The side-effects of non-working SSL are far too big to be ignored or being addressed to the other end of the SSL connection. One can't argue to a customer running webshops, that paypal has an invalid implementation of TLS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965371 Title: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/965371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968085] [NEW] 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem
Public bug reported: After updating a precise amd64 server from libssl1.0.0 (1.0.0g-1ubuntu1) to libssl1.0.0 (1.0.1-2ubuntu2) by regular apt-get update/upgrade, outgoing https connections stopped working stable. This depends on the target to connect to and at least affects php5-curl, curl, openssl s_client and wget. q I'm able to reproduce this behavior by trying to connect to https://www.postbank.de/ and https://www.paypal.com/ I assume some negotiation problem. e.g. https://www.gmx.net/ works. Attached is the output of # openssl s_client -debug -msg -state -status -connect www.paypal.com:443 1.0.0g-1ubuntu1 is working, 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 is NOT working. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968085 Title: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/968085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968085] Re: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem
** Attachment added: 1.0.0g Working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968085/+attachment/2959334/+files/libssl_1.0.0g-1ubuntu1_WORKING_Example.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968085 Title: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/968085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968085] Re: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem
Sorry, here's the Output of the NOT working 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/968085/+attachment/2959340/+files/libssl_1.0.1-2ubuntu2_NOT_WORKING_Example.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968085 Title: 1.0.1-2ubuntu2 client side connect problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/968085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912308] [NEW] ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual
Public bug reported: The default LVM Layout used by precise installer creates an ext2 /boot Partition. When using the linux-virtual kernel, the system is unable to mount /boot from fstab since there's no ext2 support. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-virtual 3.2.0.7.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-7.13-virtual 3.2.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-7-virtual x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw---T 1 root audio 116, 1 Jan 4 17:30 seq crw-rw---T 1 root audio 116, 33 Jan 4 17:30 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory CurrentDmesg: [ 24.480171] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Thu Jan 5 15:41:01 2012 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4357ad3f-1be0-4501-ac4b-0d7f96de559c InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (2029) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021 VirtualBox USB Tablet MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox PciMultimedia: ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-7-virtual root=/dev/mapper/hostname-root ro RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.2.0-7-virtual N/A linux-backports-modules-3.2.0-7-virtual N/A linux-firmware 1.67 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2: dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912308 Title: ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/912308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912308] Re: ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912308 Title: ext2 boot partition not recognized by linux-virtual To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/912308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV
Regarding #21. Thank You guys for trying to solve this issue, but I'm afraid I do not have to different kinds of GPU at that machine. Indeed, it's a quad monitor setup on two identical GeForce 7300 LE using Oneiric's propriatery nvidia 280.13. Just ask, if you need more logfiles, gdb outputs, etc... I'll post anything which could be helpful, cause it's a bad fact that (at least my own) multi monitor setups are getting worse by each release :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Title: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/810182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV
Thank's thomas, i've done the backtraces with the original nux-tools and additionally with the nux-tools-dbgsym. gdb output is attached. ** Attachment added: gdb output nux-tools oneiric https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/810182/+attachment/2538458/+files/gdb-unity_support_test.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Title: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/810182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV
regarding #19, see attachment. ** Attachment added: gdb output nux-tools-dbgsym oneiric https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/810182/+attachment/2538460/+files/gdb-unity_support_test-dbgsym.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Title: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/810182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV
@Jay Taoko Sorry for the late response, I don't know how to do a stack trace w/ symbols. gdb --args /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p shows Starting program: /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x08048ed2 in ?? () I assume this is doesn't help very much. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Title: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/810182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810182] Re: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV
On latest oneiric I've got following result: /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p Segmentation fault (core dumped) NVidia driver is 280.13, glxinfo is attached as file. ** Attachment added: glxinfo output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/810182/+attachment/2520366/+files/glxinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810182 Title: unity_support_test crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/810182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368491] Re: Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN
Just for the records: This bug is reproducable since Ubuntu Gutsty and renders Ubuntu virtually useless for Virtualization Servers with HA iSCSI connectivity. -- Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 368491] Re: Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN
Just for the records: This bug is reproducable since Ubuntu Gutsty and renders Ubuntu virtually useless for Virtualization Servers with HA iSCSI connectivity. -- Cannot mount partition on iSCSI LUN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239420] [NEW] eog initial size on triple head configuration
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog eog obviously starts up with about 80% of screen width. If the screen is e.g. 3840 x 1024, eog starts with 2880x2065+480+46 which is really annoying as one has to move and resize the window (not necessarily the shown image) a few times to completely fit into the visible screen. I propose two solutions: a) keep last window position in mind an re-use it on startup b) calculate on base of the screen height, not the screen width anyway, thanks for providing this software ;) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 12 12:36:53 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/eog NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: eog 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/User Name/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: eog Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- eog initial size on triple head configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239420] Re: eog initial size on triple head configuration
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233092/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233093/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15233094/ProcStatus.txt -- eog initial size on triple head configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 239420] Re: eog initial size on triple head configuration
Pedro Villavicencio schrieb: thanks for your report, may you forward this upstream since you have that configuration? The bug has been filed upstream as suggested. Thanks for your response! -- eog initial size on triple head configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
