[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-12-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package reportbug - 3.47ubuntu1

---
reportbug (3.47ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
- Make reportbug stop working for bts=ubuntu and refer to
  "ubuntu-bug" instead (LP: #228183, #123414)
- reportbug: exit with an error, if bts=ubuntu (or unconfigured)
- debian/control: add prominent note to package description

reportbug (3.47) unstable; urgency=low

  * reportbuglib/reportbug_ui_text.py
- added filter for bugs reports, removing all the additional info not
  needed; thanks to Ryo Igarashi for the report; Closes: #504424

reportbug (3.46) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/control
- updated my email address
  * reportbuglib/reportbug_ui_text.py
- convert BTS output from UTF-8 to local encoding; thanks to Mark Hobley,
  Gregor Herrmann and Klaus Ethgen for the bug reports and to Vincent
  Fourmond for the patch; Closes: #497641, #496159, #504005

reportbug (3.45) unstable; urgency=low

  * reportbuglib/reportbug_ui_urwid.py
- added get_password function; thanks to Torsten Wiebke and Jan Muszynski
  for the reports; Closes: #494509, #491328
  * reportbuglib/debianbts.py
- added removal of cruft from BTS parsed page; thanks to Davide Prina, Dan
  Greene and Paul Menzel for the reports; Closes: #494545, #495018, #495050

reportbug (3.44) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Chris Lawrence ]
  * reportbug
+ Yet another character set issue fix.  (Closes: #492240)

  [ Sandro Tosi ]
  * debian/control
- changed build-dep-indep from python-dev to python
- bump required Python version to >= 2.5; thanks to Gilles Sadowski for
  the report; Closes: #492490 (RC bug, hence urgency set to medium)

reportbug (3.43) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Ben Finney ]
  * reportbuglib/reportbug_ui_urwid.py
+ Ensure 'spawn_editor' is available for 'urwid' interface
  (closes: #488928).

  [ Sandro Tosi ]
  * reportbuglib/reportbug.py, reportbug
- reports status of suggested packages; thanks to Ari Pollak for the
  report; Closes: #441056
  * reportbug
- fixed packages list generation for a file search if run not in a tty (or
  via --template); thanks to Dan Jacobson for the report; Closes: #489515
- for serious bugs, clearly states that "unknown" section downgrades to
  normal; thanks to Michael Meskes for the report; Closes: #362947
- --template now includes "Package-specific info"; thanks to Marc Haber
  for the report; Closes: #396899
  * reportbuglib/reportbug.py
- show system information only if the bug is not against wnpp; thanks to
  Francois Marier for the report; Closes: #448806
- reinforce that RM bugs for testing are for testing only; thanks to
  Adeodato Simó for the report; Closes: #491013
  * README.Users
- added how to usertag a bug at submit-time
  * TODO
- removed CVS location (outdated and now supported with Vcs-Svn in
  debian/control)
- removed item for migration to python-btsutils, filed a bug instead:
  #490548
  * debian/copyright
- shortened Format-Specification, removing the GET parameter on the URL
  (lintian warning)

reportbug (3.42) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Sandro Tosi ]
  * debian/control
- bump Standards-Version to 3.8.0 (no changes needed)
  * checks/compare_pseudo-pkgs_lists.py
- updated ftp-master url (previous was on brz, but ftp-master moved to
  git and there is no web file access)
  * reportbug
- do not ask for additional tags if the user is filing a bug against
  ftp.debian.org; thanks to Bernd Zeimetz for the report; Closes: #486753
- all fields of ITP bugs must contain valid data and not template lines;
  thanks to Adeodato Simó for the bug report; Closes: #293361
  * README.Users
- added to contain suggestions or some info helpful to users
  * checks/compare_pseudo-pkgs_lists.py
- updated due to new reportbuglib format

  [ Sandro Tosi, Ben Finney ]
  * reportbug
- Changed shebang to Debian standard "/usr/bin/python", removing "-S"
  parameter. Now urwid is imported; thanks to Neil Mayhew for the hint.
  (Closes: #484534)

  [ Ben Finney ]
  * reportbug
  * querybts
  * script
- Standardise all Python programs to same shebang line as per Debian
  Python policy §1.3.2.
  * reportbug_submit.py
  * checks/compare_pseudo-pkgs_lists.py
- Remove shebang line from non-executable modules.
  * Tidy up imports.
- reportbug, querybts, *.py
  - Remove redundant imports.
  - Import names explicitly.
  - Use '__import__' for importing dynamically-named modules,
instead of 'exec' + 'eval'.
- reportbug_submit.py
  - Don't munge sys.path unnecessarily.
- test/*.py
  - Ensure programs and modules don't cause ImportError.
  * Move library modules to new 'reportbuglib' Python package.
  * debian/rules
- Install library modules from current location.

 -- Daniel Hahler <[EMAIL 

[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-12-10 Thread Daniel Hahler
I will change reportbug, so that it only works with bts=debian and add 
instructions/notes in the package description and error message (in case of 
bts=ubuntu), referring to "ubuntu-bug" and mentioning that it's only useful for 
reporting bugs to Debian (in case you know what you are doing).
As far as I can see, this seems to be the best solution for now - please answer 
back, in case I'm missing something.

** Changed in: reportbug (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hahler (blueyed)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
To get the package removed, ubuntu-archive needs to be subscribed. They are the
ones who can remove the package, and who have the last word on the subject.

I agree ideally reportbug should be extended to work with Launchpad, but until
someone does that work, I think there's no sense in having it sending bugs to a
users mailing list.

On the other hand, the patch to send bugs to the mailing list could be reverted,
and require some environment variable or file in $HOME or whatever in order to
send bugs to Debian (to avoid Ubuntu bugs being wrongly sent to Debian), like
Lucas has proposed.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 16:12, auspex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm frankly astounded at Santo's statement that we need to contact

I think you're referring to me (it would be pleasant to have it
spelled correctly)

> somebody _else_ to get this fixed.  If that's the situation, what on
> earth is even the point of having Launchpad!  THIS is where solutions
> are supposed to be discussed and found.

Sure, and what solution have you found? Oh, yeah, nothing... if you
believe that removal is the solution, then follow it up.

Are you able to remove the package? do it. is anybody at ubuntu
listening here able to remove it? do it. If not, contact someone that
can. THIS is a solution, and a plan to implement it. Simply keep
looping won't solve it.

Sandro

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-04 Thread auspex
I'm frankly astounded at Santo's statement that we need to contact
somebody _else_ to get this fixed.  If that's the situation, what on
earth is even the point of having Launchpad!  THIS is where solutions
are supposed to be discussed and found.

I, of course, agree with Antony.  It's simply not true, Lucas, that
"bugreport", the executable, is useful - because it doesn't actually
send bug reports anywhere.  Sure it can help gather the needed info -
but that doesn't have to be the bugreport executable.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Antony Gelberg
Lucas,

It's useful to developers, who are roughly what percentage of the Ubuntu
user-base?  And who surely know how to manually install a package from
Debian?  Besides surely, if they want to report a Debian bug, can't they
just use reportbug from their Debian install?

Besides, IT IS BROKEN AS SHIPPED.  Why do people keep making excuses, as
if it's okay to ship broken software as a few developers know what to do
with it?  If someone writes a patch that fixes it, then fine.  Nobody
has.  So on that basis, it should be removed.  If someone writes an
acceptable patch for Ubuntu, and the maintainers apply it, then
naturally it should be readmitted.

Antony

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
FWIW, I agree with Sarah Hobbs and Brian Murray wrote above. I don't think 
reportbug should be removed.
- it's useful to Ubuntu developers.
- removing it won't solve the problem for users who already have it installed.

so it should be "fixed", by adding a message that says that it mustn't be used 
to report bugs against Ubuntu.
possible pseudo-code:
if not file.exists?("$HOME/.i_really_want_to_use_reportbug")
print("blurb about reportbug not being useful for reporting bugs in Ubuntu, 
and link to LP")
exit(1)
endif

Doesn't sound like rocket science.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I used a strong word ("stupid"), but I didn't mean it to apply to you.

I didn't take that as personal :)

> The process itself is clearly pathological.  So far, no Ubuntu person
> has demonstrated the authority and decisiveness to simply remove the
> broken, harmful component while we work on fixing, replacing, or
> improving it.  It is rather discouraging.

I don't know the organization in Ubuntu, but you have to escalate this
issue to higher level than "mare" developers: some sort of leader,
tech committee, release managers or so.

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
> Zooko summed it up well enough, are any Ubuntu release-team developers
> reading this?

Don't hope for any of them to look at it and ne pro-active: contact
them and ask for its removal. Too much time has been wasted (this
email thread come to me from Jul 6 on) talking instead of doing.

Sandro

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Sandro:

I used a strong word ("stupid"), but I didn't mean it to apply to you.
I assume that you are just now joining this conversation and are not
aware that we've been going round and round on this for years
(literally, years -- I first opened a bug report which was a predecessor
to this bug report, since launchpad didn't exist back then, years ago).

The process itself is clearly pathological.  So far, no Ubuntu person
has demonstrated the authority and decisiveness to simply remove the
broken, harmful component while we work on fixing, replacing, or
improving it.  It is rather discouraging.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Antony Gelberg
Sandro, I don't think your comments are especially helpful, sort of
standing at the side of the discussion sniping.

The package is broken, hence not useful, without specific developer
knowledge that most users don't have.  That is the point.  Fixing it
would be a good idea (duh!), but while it's being fixed (and especially
given that it's /not/ being fixed), then it should be removed.

Developers and other advanced users who require it know where to get it,
and how to install and configure it so that it works for them.  They are
not the ones who will fall foul of the broken-ness.  I didn't think
Ubuntu was a distribution that was geared towards this sort of user.

Zooko summed it up well enough, are any Ubuntu release-team developers
reading this?

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 15:28, Zooko O'Whielacronx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Argh!
>
> Sandro: you have just, 25 minutes ago, begun the Nth iteration of this
> stupid process.

The only stupid thing here is removing a useful package instead of
fixing it.

Sandro

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Argh!

Sandro: you have just, 25 minutes ago, begun the Nth iteration of this
stupid process.

This package has been wasting the time of users for years now, perhaps
since the first ever release of Ubuntu.  Every time someone asks Ubuntu
to stop shipping it on the grounds that not only does it fail to do
something good, but it actively does something bad, then someone else
says "Well, let's fix it instead!", then there follows a discussion
about how to fix or replace it, which goes nowhere.  Eventually, that
the discussion dies off, and then a new release of Ubuntu comes out with
the same stupid broken package in it.

Allow me to suggest a simple course of action which is sure to break
this cycle.

Step 1:  PLEASE JUST REMOVE THE DAMNED EXECUTABLE!

Step is estimated to take about 5 minutes.

Step 2:  Then please proceed to begin the N+1th iteration of a
discussion about how to fix or replace it.

Thank you.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
> but /usr/bin/reportbug has to go.
[8<]
> It's just plain rude to stick a tool on a naive user's system, tell him
> it does something other than what it really does, but keep it around
> just because the real experts know how to work around it.

Why not fix it, instead?

Sandro

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-03 Thread auspex
Then keep a package with querybts, and you can even call it reportbug if
you want - but /usr/bin/reportbug has to go.  As long as it's there,
people will be sending bug reports to the ubuntu mailing lists,
believing they're doing their part to improve the world, and ticking off
the folks on the list.

It's just plain rude to stick a tool on a naive user's system, tell him
it does something other than what it really does, but keep it around
just because the real experts know how to work around it.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-09-02 Thread Brian Murray
The reportbug package also includes the tool querybts which is quite
useful for establishing relationships between Ubuntu and Debian bug
reports.  It'd be unfortunate to have that removed.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-07-06 Thread Antony Gelberg
Sarah, the fact that Ubuntu developers want to use it to file bugs in
Debian is neither here nor there.  It's broken, and most users aren't
developers.  By default, it doesn't file bugs to Debian on an Ubuntu
system.  Bugs can be filed in Debian in other ways, and developers
should know enough to be able to install reportbug manually, if they
want it.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-07-06 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
I already posted this message to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reportbug/+bug/123414 , but I
am sufficiently angry about years and years passing with no improvement
in this situation that I am going to repeat myself here:

I just tried to use reportbug 3.39ubuntu3 on Hardy, and it obscurely
failed.

Scanning the bugs of the reportbug package in Hardy, it appears to me
that what is going on is that Ubuntu developers use it to report bugs to
Debian, but that it has never worked for Ubuntu users (I see some bug
reports including ones that I contributed to from four years ago). This
makes me angry that Ubuntu developers have decided to leave something
lying around which is labelled as a tool that I can use to report bugs,
so then I spend my precious time writing up bug reports for you, and
then the tool wastes my bug reports. Don't you respect my time more than
that? There is a simple solution: add one sentence to the package
description which says "THIS IS NOT FOR USERS TO REPORT BUGS IN UBUNTU
-- THIS IS USED ONLY BY UBUNTU DEVELOPERS TO REPORT BUGS IN DEBIAN.".

Now, something else that I have noticed is that over the last four or so
years, many people have many times requested that Ubuntu stop
distributing this "broken" reportbug which leads users to think that
they can use it to report bugs and then silently wastes their bug
reports. What happens every time is this: a user asks Ubuntu to stop
distributing this broken tool which wastes their precious time, then
some other people say "Oh, but we should *really* fix Ubuntu bug
reporting this way or that way.", and then nothing gets done. The
solution to this, too is simple: *first* fix the problem that reportbug
is wasting people's time and their goodwill, by either removing it from
Ubuntu or at the very least by adding the warning message to the package
description as mentioned above. *Then* start thinking about how to fix
various problems, such as the fact that old versions of reportbug are
still distributed in older Ubuntu releases, and how to make a good
reportbug-alike that works for Ubuntu, and so forth.

Got that? Do not reply to this message with talk about how to improve
reportbug. Instead, add the aforementioned warning message or remove
reportbug from Ubuntu. Then reply to this message talking about how to
make a new improved one. Thank you.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-05-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Another problem with removing it is that users that installed 8.04 and
have it installed will continue to file bugs to Debian (see LP bug
#229847). It's better to update it, make it display a message about
filing bug to launchpad, but let people who know what they are doing use
it to file bugs directly to Debian, like Sarah said.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-05-16 Thread Sarah Hobbs
Please fix it, instead of removing it.  A lot of us file legitimate bugs
to debian with it.

Perhaps create a message about reportbug being deprecated for Ubuntu,
and an offer to launch apport, or something, or to specify a bug
tracker.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228183] Re: Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu

2008-05-10 Thread Scott
I thought I'd asked for this eons ago in different bug reports.

Agreed. reportbug serves no purpose whatsoever. What's the point of
having a package that doesn't work at all?

Not only does it not work, but it leads many to believe that it does (by
it's very existence).

And how the Ubuntu users mailing list got into the code is a great
mystery that I hope shall be solved someday.

But in the meantime, this package does not belong in the Ubuntu archive.

Please remove it in time for 8.04.1.

-- 
Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs