RE: Samba CVE-2018-1057
Hi James, The latest package for xenial appears to be 4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.13, which means it uses the original upstream 4.3.11 sources *plus* patches from Ubuntu. This is standard practice for Ubuntu release, where you don't get upgraded to new versions of your packages, but you do get security fixes applied to them. You can download the Ubuntu packaging source here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/samba_4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.13.debian.tar.xz In that, under the /debian/patches/ directory, you will see the patches that fix CVE-2018-1057. -- Michael Hall mhall...@gmail.com On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:17 AM, James Boland wrote: Sorry Nish, I didn’t realise it was already patched. The newest ubuntu package was reporting Samba version 4.3.11 whereas Samba.org had 4.8.0 released. I wasn’t aware these were two separate tracks. My bad. Cheers, James -Original Message- From: Nish Aravamudan Sent: 20 March 2018 20:32 To: James Boland Cc: Ubuntu Core developers Subject: Re: Samba CVE-2018-1057 Hi James, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:30 AM, James Boland wrote: Hi there, Are there any plans to upgrade the current Samba package to mitigate again the recent security bug in CVE-2018-1057 ? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2018/CVE-2018-1057.html Thanks, Nish -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Outdated arduino package?
If you are on 16.04 I have a Snap package of the Arduino IDE 1.6.9 I can share with you. I'm working on getting it into the snap store. -- Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 07/23/2016 11:02 AM, Starbeamrainbowlabs wrote: > Hello, > > I'm emailing to ask about the official arduino package in the Ubuntu > repositories. It's currently at version 1.0.5, yet the latest version on > the arduino website is version 1.6.9. It looks like this package hasn't > been updated since ~May 2013. > > I looked at setting up my own ppa on launchpad and repackaging the > arduino IDE myself, but instructions I found were so horrendously > complicated and mentioned so many things that I hadn't heard of (and I'm > fairly confident in a terminal) I've given up :( > > Is it possible to have the arduino package in the official Ubuntu ppa > for xenial updated please? If not, I'm open to having another go at > packaging it myself, but I currently can't find any tutorials out there > that explain the process adequately. > > Many thanks, > Starbeamrainbowlabs (keybase.io/sbrl <https://keybase.io/sbrl>) > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: snapd contribution license
On 06/14/2016 11:42 PM, thgntlmnfrmtrlfmdr wrote: > Hi guys, let's talk about snaps. There seems to be a problem with the > snapd contributor's license > agreement: > https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/ff2478d1-Canonical-HA-CLA-ANY-I_v1.2.pdf > > "2.3 Outbound License > Based on the grant of rights in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, if We > include Your Contribution in a Material, We may license the > Contribution under any license, including copyleft, > permissive, commercial, or _*proprietar*y_ licenses. As a > condition on the exercise of this right, We agree to also > license the Contribution under the terms of the license or > licenses which We are using for the Material on the > Submission Date." > > As you can see, it seems to allow Canonical to relicense any > contribution to snapd under a closed source license. In other words, it > doesn't seem to be copyleft at all, since Canonical can take it out of > the open source ecosystem at any time apparently. > > As far as I can tell, the license isn't permissive either, since only > Canonical can relicense stuff. Thus is appears to be a nonfree license. > > Am I reading this wrong? What is going on here? > > That is not a correct reading of the CLA. The ability to license something as non-open in the future doesn't change the fact that what is currently released is open. Technically if somebody is the sole copyright holder on a project they always have this ability, even if they released it under the GPL without a CLA. The open licenses in almost all cases are perpetual, which means you can't revoke the open license on existing code, only change it for future code. Nor are CLAs something uncommon for open source projects, the FSF uses them, OpenStack uses them, and many many more. Please don't let yourself get pulled into FUD about the CLA. To date Canonical has only ever open sourced projects that had started out closed, never the opposite. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Feature Request
Hi Jaden, I'm glad you've got an interest in improving the user experience of Unity. We have some instructions written up to help people get started contributing designs, you can read them here: http://unity.ubuntu.com/getinvolved/design/ I would also encourage you to join the #ubuntu-unity IRC channel on freenode and discuss your ideas with the developers, who can give you insights into what implementation considerations you will need to think about in putting together you final design. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 03/24/2016 11:22 AM, Jaden Peterson wrote: > Hello, I have a request for a feature in Unity. Could you make an option > in the dconf to have a separate bar for the menus under the window > decorations. Personally, I like the already existent functionality of > hovering over the window decorations, revealing the menu. However, for > desktops or devices with large displays, it would be nice to use that > space and have the menu's more accessible. > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Can we have a sunset filter effect in Unity, KDE, and Compiz
On 11/13/2015 10:44 AM, John Moser wrote: > I'd like to see a configuration option to uniformly reduce the blue > channel in the desktop during certain hours. It's ugly, but people have > had good results on other OSes with fading the screen to red-orange as > it nears their bedtime, using applications such as F.lux. This prevents > the brain from staying awake and excited, or so goes the hypothesis. > > Thoughts? > > There is a package called 'redshift' which will do this, you can set it to run in your user session at startup. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Wubi
Modern Windows releases broke Wubi, so we stopped shipping and supporting it a while back. As far as I know it's a dead-end now. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 08/21/2015 05:13 AM, Alan Pope wrote: > Hey, > > Is wubi still a supported way of installing? If so, who maintains it? > > Seems we have some bugs [1] including one fairly serious one [2] which > causes the wrong version of Ubuntu to get installed. > > I was told wubi (installer) was to be replaced by a simpler wubi which > is just a menu. This doesn't seem to have happened. If we don't plan > on fixing these (new user) facing issues, is it time to retire wubi > from the images? > > Cheers, > Al. > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/wubi > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/wubi/+bug/1471344 > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
South East Linux Fest UbuCon
Hello Ubuntu Developers! Ubuntu is sponsoring the South East Linux Fest this year in Charlotte North Carolina, and as part of that we will have a room to use all day Friday, June 12, for an UbuCon. http://www.southeastlinuxfest.org/ I'm recruiting speakers to fill an hour-long slot, if anybody is willing and able to attend the conference and wants to give a presentation to a room full of enthusiastic Ubuntu users, please let me know. Topic can be anything Ubuntu related, design, development, client, cloud, using it, community, etc. -- Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Unity window layout
Chrome has a setting to use the system window decorations, which puts the window controls on the left. The main reason not to move it is because of the way Unity merges the window title bar with the top panel for maximized windows. When that happens, your window controls are still there in the top-left. But if they were on the right of the window title, they would conflict with the indicators on the right of the top panel. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 01/13/2015 02:17 PM, Saurbaum wrote: > I'm curious about the reasoning behind the decision to restrict the > window buttons location in Unity. > > It's fine to have a preferred default side to place them on from a > design perspective, but to actually prevent customisation and lock it > down seems rather draconian. > > Consider that the layout isn't even reliably enforced on third party > applications. The two that leap to mine are Steam and Chrome which both > place their own themed buttons in a Windows layout. > > Personally I would love to use Unity and have the buttons on the right > of the screen. It's where my mouse lives most of the time because > that's where the scroll bar for the windows are. Having to make my way > to the left hand edge to close them feels like reaching across myself. > > Ian > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Devuan
It's fairly impossible, at this point in time, to have a discuss about Devuan without it also being a discussion about systemd, that is the raison d'etat for it's existence. If they can get it off the ground and produce a stable, sustainable distribution, then that might change. Michael Hall mhall...@gmail.com On 12/01/2014 02:31 PM, Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote: > El 01/12/14 a las 15:45, Michael Hall escibió: >> Please do keep an eye on Devuan's development, and participate in it if >> you are interested in the direction they are taking. But I think we can >> all agree that it is *far* too early to start thinking about rebase-ing >> off of it. > I only seek to comment that it would be interesting to pay attention to > the project. I do not know why it ended in a discussion about systemd or > its alternatives. or why it created so many negative reactions. > It is not the first time that Ubuntu takes a fork (libreoffice, libav) > and I think that negative reactions as exaggerated discourage > participation of users > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Devuan
On 12/01/2014 09:22 AM, Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote: > I just learned of the launch of Devuan > https://devuan.org/ > A fork of Debian which eliminates the requirement to use systemd, and > promises to build a less bureaucratic and more friendly community > towards the derived distros > Will have to see how the project evolves, but if they do not be a bad > idea that Ubuntu will begin to rely on it > Please do keep an eye on Devuan's development, and participate in it if you are interested in the direction they are taking. But I think we can all agree that it is *far* too early to start thinking about rebase-ing off of it. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Devuan
Please note that telling somebody you think their post is off-topic is not the same as telling them it can not be discussed. The topic has in fact continued to be discussed despite Scott's opinion. If you don't agree with him, just say so and continue the discussion, there is no need to make this personal. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 12/01/2014 12:11 PM, Alexander Hanff wrote: > Who died and made you god of what people can and cannot discuss on this > list. Diego spotted an interesting new development which he brought to the > attention of the list with the suggestion that it might potentially be > useful to Ubuntu in the future - that is completely relevant and completely > acceptable content to post - you have zero right to come down on him and > accuse him of being off-topic just because you don't like the idea, so > please, get off your high horse. > > -Original Message- > From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com > [mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: 01 December 2014 18:03 > To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: Devuan > > As I explained, it's not relevant. I get you think it is. I disagree. The > mail (since you care to debate it) is also based on a false premise. There > is no requirement in Debian to use systemd as the init system. It is the > default. It's trivial to retain sysvinit and possible to use upstart. > > None of which is relevant to Ubuntu which has never offered init system > choice and moved off of sysvinit last decade. > > Scott K > > On Monday, December 01, 2014 05:58:37 PM Alexander Hanff wrote: >> I don't think your response was called for Scott - whether you agree >> or not with the suggestion doesn't make it any less relevant. To say >> it is off-topic is ridiculous, it is absolutely relevant to Ubuntu >> development and was something Diego wanted to point out as a potential >> option for Ubuntu in the future. >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com >> [mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of >> Scott Kitterman >> Sent: 01 December 2014 17:42 >> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Subject: Re: Devuan >> >> On Monday, December 01, 2014 11:22:22 AM Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote: >>> I just learned of the launch of Devuan https://devuan.org/ A fork of >>> Debian which eliminates the requirement to use systemd, and promises >>> to build a less bureaucratic and more friendly community towards the >>> derived distros Will have to see how the project evolves, but if >>> they do not be a bad idea that Ubuntu will begin to rely on it >> >> That's rather unrelated to Ubuntu development. Ubuntu has taken it's >> own decisions on init systems for some time (it wasn't in this decade >> that Ubuntu last had a release that used sysvinit). >> >> Please stay on topic. >> >> Scott K >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Response to Erich Schubert (systemd fanboi / male feminist) and his lies.
This is off-topic for this list, and the tone is not appropriate. Please keep posts topical and respectful. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 11/11/2014 06:18 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote: > Erich Schubert is a male feminist. The sort of person > who is in good standing with current debian social politics. > He has taken to spread a number of falsehoods in his recent column. > http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201411/2014110901-gr-vote-on-init-coupling.html#comments > > Dear Mr Schubert; > > "He has not contributed anything to the open source community." > This is a complete lie. I've contributed gigabytes of media alone. > I've done years and years of programming work. > I have done far more than you ever will. > > "His songs and "games" are not worth looking at," > Your subjective view. Coloured by your social views and your > disdain for those who oppose you in that. > > "and I'm not aware of any project that has accepted any of his > "contributions"." > The only objectively true thing you've said: you're not aware. > I'm glad you're unaware, I hope that trend continues. > > I expect this post to be censored, it is par for the course for people like > you. > > Sincerely; > --MikeeUSA-- > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
This user has been unsubscribed and banned from the list. I am now working on getting the offensive thread removed from the archive. Apologies for the disruption, and to everybody who had to see it. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
I am working with the list admins to get this removed. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 11/05/2014 01:17 PM, M.hanny sabbagh wrote: > Now that's not very diplomatic, i didn't expect to see this sort of > conversations on a developers list, specially those about open source > software. > > Too bad to see that.. in here.. > > News will talk about this. > >> From: castleofwh...@mail.com >> To: john.r.mo...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:13:54 +0100 >> CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Nope. Fuck you. >> It was good enough for us then and it's good enough for us now. >> You can use this media with any GPL program or other GPL media. >> Go and fuck yourself. >> (and hey, it's dual licensed under CC BY SA anyway if you're a > homosexual who is anal) >> >> The Law is all about appeals to authority, dumbass. >> >> It's my fucking song and I can distribute it as I like, and I say the > GPL is the license. >> You can certainly use it and modify it and do anything you could do > with a GPL program. >> YOU cannot tell ME what I decide for MY FUCKING SONGS YOU PIECE OF SHIT. >> >> FUCK YOU YOU DAMNED PRO FEMINIST FUCK. >> And Fuck SystemD. >> >> >> My Copyright protected work, MY LICENSING DECISION. >> And I have decided GPL. It has always worked and is proven. >> And if you continue to keep saying I have licensed it less permissably. >> >> Well then that's libel and I hope to see you in an alleyway, because > you're spreading lies about me. >> Shut your fucking mouth. >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 at 6:07 PM >> From: "John Moser" >> To: "Castle OfWhite" , > ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> On 11/05/2014 01:01 PM, Castle OfWhite wrote: >> > It's licensed elsewhere under CC-BY-SA aswell, just for such an > occasion. >> > The GPL is a fine media license when said media is a part of a program >> > (game etc). In such cases Judges usually see the entire thing as a whole >> > rather than a collection of parts. >> > >> >> That's a weak argument. It's an appeal to authority and to tradition. >> >> The GPL directly describes considerations for linking and source code, >> as well as program executable modules. While it makes some sense to >> include resources in the definition of the program in general, >> extracting the media from the program immediately creates confusion >> about what exactly was violated; the only proper interpretation is that >> distributing the media with the program is allowed, while the media >> without being part of the program is not under any permissive license >> and, thus, distributing it is a copyright violation. >> >> > I do know what I'm doing, and You show your ignorance :). >> > I've been writing programs and making free/opensource media >> > from before the CC license were created. >> > >> > Back then we just licensed our stuff under the GPL, the BSD license, or >> > the gnu FDL. (or all of them) Worked fine. People understood. >> > >> > SO FUCK YOU! >> > >> > Go fuck yourself you pro-feminist pro-systemd piece of shit. >> > (I remeber when there weren't feminists in free/opensource too) >> > (nor better-than-thou systemd loving assholes) >> > >> > I hope Mr Cook is edged out because he supports your beliefs >> > (and that is leading to a ban in russia of apple products) >> > You people need to be fought back against. You've ruined the >> > world for regular men. >> > >> >> Okay, civilized conversation has broken down. >> >> >> >> On 11/05/2014 12:27 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote: >> >>> A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> >>> "More code .: better" >> >>> >> >>> youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk >> >>> >> >>> SystemD introduces (further) systemic vulnerabilities into Gnu/Linux. >> >>> Here is a song feeling that situation out. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Take this immaturity elsewhere. I thought I was being spammed by >> >> YouTube again. >> >> >> >>> (C) Gnu GPL v2 >> >>> >> >> >> >> GPL is not an appropriate media license; it is a license for source >> >> code. This usage shows you like to make statements about things you >> >> don't understand; thus your assessments of systemd are immediately >> >> suspect, and readily assumed misguided. >> >> >> >> In other words: you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and >> >> your input on any matter is valueless. >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
Please do not engage with this person further, I'm working to get this removed from the ML. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com On 11/05/2014 01:07 PM, Castle OfWhite wrote: > Feminist should all be shot in the head. The world would be a better place > for males. > Girls should be married when they are still children, as happened in the Old > Testament. > If a man rapes a young girl who has not allready been given/promised away the > effect should be that he keep her forever and pays the father some money. > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 at 6:04 PM > From: "Alexander Langanke" > To: "Castle OfWhite" > Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com, john.r.mo...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. > Hello to all, > > as an Ubuntu and Open Source enthusiast who is just reading this mailing list > to keep informed.. > > Can this person please be banned, I do not believe anyone here shares such > hateful and discriminating views on humans. > > Thank you. > Alexander Langanke > On Mi, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:01 , Castle OfWhite wrote: > It's licensed elsewhere under CC-BY-SA aswell, just for such an occasion. The > GPL is a fine media license when said media is a part of a program (game > etc). In such cases Judges usually see the entire thing as a whole rather > than a collection of parts. I do know what I'm doing, and You show your > ignorance :). I've been writing programs and making free/opensource media > from before the CC license were created. Back then we just licensed our stuff > under the GPL, the BSD license, or the gnu FDL. (or all of them) Worked fine. > People understood. SO FUCK YOU! Go fuck yourself you pro-feminist pro-systemd > piece of shit. (I remeber when there weren't feminists in free/opensource > too) (nor better-than-thou systemd loving assholes) I hope Mr Cook is edged > out because he supports your beliefs (and that is leading to a ban in russia > of apple products) You people need to be fought back against. You've ruined > the world for regular men.On 11/05/2014 12:27 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote:A > Jumble of Line s - Because that's what systemD is. "More code .: better" youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk SystemD introduces (further) systemic vulnerabilities into Gnu/Linux. Here is a song feeling that situation out.Take this immaturity elsewhere. I thought I was being spammed by YouTube again.(C) Gnu GPL v2GPL is not an appropriate media license; it is a license for source code. This usage shows you like to make statements about things you don't understand; thus your assessments of systemd are immediately suspect, and readily assumed misguided. In other words: you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and your input on any matter is valueless. > --Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Planning the next Ubuntu Online Summit
Hello everyone, Yesterday Daniel Holbach announced that we were planning to have the next Ubuntu Online Summit in November, skipping the mid-cycle dates because they were not going to be useful to either the community or Canonical teams involved. It's come to out attention that the original week selected, November 4th - 6th, would overlap with the OpenStack Summit, so we're now looking at either the second or third week of November (the last week is Thanksgiving holidays in the USA). But we would also like to start a discussion about the format, tracks and participation in the next UOS and start gathering sessions early on so that people have enough time to rearrange their schedules if necessary to attend those they are interested in. So to kick that off, consider this an official call for feedback, both on the last UOS and previous vUDS events. Tell us what you enjoyed about it, what you didn't enjoy, what we can change to make it work better for you, your teams and your projects. We want to make these online events as meaningful and useful to you as possible, so we're open to any suggestions -- Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
