Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-30 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 01:26 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
 On 2008/10/30 12:41 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:
 
  And as mentioned already, anyone who uses mc will probably not be using
  it off a live cd anyway.
 
 Any time I boot a Knoppix CD it's a virtual certainty that the first thing I
 do once it finishes booting is start MC. I boot Knoppix to fix things, and MC
 is my main tool for generic fixing. A live CD without MC is like a tool chest
 that contains no wrench or socket that fits the most common bolt sizes, and
 no fitsall wrenches either.

Except the Ubuntu Desktop CD isn't intended as a recovery disc.  A
Knoppix CD (which doesn't have the constraint that it should give a
preview of a full Ubuntu install) is full of useful recovery programs.

You appear to be complaining that the Ubuntu live CD isn't a good
recovery disc, which is a reasonable statement.  It's not really
intended to be, so your follow up so you should add some things to make
it a good recovery disc *isn't* a reasonable request when the CD is
already full.  If there were space enough to allow us to ship a Desktop
CD that was both a full Ubuntu install *and* a good recovery disc, you
could reasonably argue that we should ship mc on there.  However there
simply *isn't* enough space; the Desktop CD is an endless fight to fit
onto a CD.  Even if Midnight Commander could automatically fix every
problem that could ever occur on any system, it *still* wouldn't get on
the Desktop CD as a recovery tool!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:17:11PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
 Felix Miata [2008-10-29 10:29 -0400]:
  How nice for you that you've never had broken X
 
 But that's not what you asked about? Even if your installed system is
 totally broken, the live system will always boot, and seriously, the
 chances that X doesn't work in the live system, not even with a boring
 800x600 VESA, are so negligible that I wouldn't care.

That's exactly what happens on my sister's desktop.  She's been asking
me to install Ubuntu forever, but none of the versions I tried has
managed to bring up X.  Even replacing the video card to the same one I
have in my desktop didn't help.

 On those systems
 you can probably not install Ubuntu/Kubuntu in the first place.

That was my reluctant conclusion.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-30 Thread Sean Hodges
Phillip Susi wrote:
 Felix Miata wrote:
  How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will
 have, and
  never will need to help someone else with broken X.
  
  So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere.
  
  Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either.
 Ever heard
  of the tyranny of the majority?
 
 How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?  Your argument seems
 like 
 complaining that emacs is not installed on the livecd.  While it is
 my 
 favorite editor, I can get by just fine with pico or even vi if I
 must 
 for rescue/recovery purposes.

I might be missing the point here, but from reading Felix's previous
messages, I believe he's more concerned that someone sold him a car
without a jack...

Sean



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:47:16 + Sean Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Phillip Susi wrote:
 Felix Miata wrote:
  How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will
 have, and
  never will need to help someone else with broken X.
  
  So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere.
  
  Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either.
 Ever heard
  of the tyranny of the majority?
 
 How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?  Your argument seems
 like 
 complaining that emacs is not installed on the livecd.  While it is
 my 
 favorite editor, I can get by just fine with pico or even vi if I
 must 
 for rescue/recovery purposes.

I might be missing the point here, but from reading Felix's previous
messages, I believe he's more concerned that someone sold him a car
without a jack...

Sean


Well then I guess he got what he paid for.

Seriously, Ubuntu development is very open and community oriented.  There 
is a process for getting stuff promoted and seeded on a CD/DvD.  Anyone can 
join in and give it a shot.

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread lkmail
Good day
Please add mc to the '8.10'. It's very useful
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Please add mc to the '8.10'. It's very useful

It's too late to change anything in 8.10, it's frozen solid :)

Also, as useful as mc is, it's only useful to a small amount of users,
and will waste precious space on the Ubuntu release discs. mc is
incredibly easy to install and it's not a big download, so I doubt it
will be an issue for anyone who wants to use it.

-Jonathan

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Martin Pitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29  5:12 +0800]:
 Good day
 Please add mc to the '8.10'. It's very useful

It's right there, package mc, as  it has always been in all Ubuntu
releases.

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 11:56 (GMT+0200) Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) composed:

 Also, as useful as mc is, it's only useful to a small amount of users,
 and will waste precious space on the Ubuntu release discs. mc is
 incredibly easy to install and it's not a big download, so I doubt it
 will be an issue for anyone who wants to use it.

Anyone who wants to use it on a live Ubuntu CD is dead. To that small amount
of users that know and use it, it's indispensible, and thus to such users who
install only to find broken X and/or networking, they're stuck with another
dead end. Leaving mc off the CD is like equipping a new car with the usual
spare tire, but no jack. Get a flat out in the boonies at night, and getting
that missing jack is less than incredibly easy, unless what displaced it on
the CD is a larger automatic jack delivery service or automatic lift.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:36, Felix Miata wrote:
 On 2008/10/29 11:56 (GMT+0200) Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) composed:
  Also, as useful as mc is, it's only useful to a small amount of users,
  and will waste precious space on the Ubuntu release discs. mc is
  incredibly easy to install and it's not a big download, so I doubt it
  will be an issue for anyone who wants to use it.

 Anyone who wants to use it on a live Ubuntu CD is dead. To that small
 amount of users that know and use it, it's indispensible, and thus to such
 users who install only to find broken X and/or networking, they're stuck
 with another dead end. Leaving mc off the CD is like equipping a new car
 with the usual spare tire, but no jack. Get a flat out in the boonies at
 night, and getting that missing jack is less than incredibly easy, unless
 what displaced it on the CD is a larger automatic jack delivery service or
 automatic lift. --

... and doesn't have a network connection 

I use stuff not on the CD in live sessions all the time and unless you are 
networkless it's not a problem at all.  

Do keep in mind that the CD is full and so anything that goes on, means 
something else comes off.  Balancing the interests of a diverse group of 
users in what goes on the CD is a continuing challenge.

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 08:51 (GMT-0400) Scott Kitterman composed:

 On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:36, Felix Miata wrote:

 ...users who install only to find broken X and/or networking
...
 Leaving mc off the CD is like equipping a new car
 with the usual spare tire, but no jack...

 ... and doesn't have a network connection 

For some number of boots, this is inevitable.

 I use stuff not on the CD in live sessions all the time and unless you are 
 networkless it's not a problem at all.  

Networkless happens, sometimes intentionally.

 Do keep in mind that the CD is full and so anything that goes on, means 
 something else comes off.  Balancing the interests of a diverse group of 
 users in what goes on the CD is a continuing challenge.

This isn't the first time here mc has been deemed dispensible. This is why I
have deemed all live Ubuntu CDs dispensible. Broken networking and broken X
happen. I'm not wasting my time driving a car with no jack, and having to
hitch a ride back for another car on those infrequent occasions when I do get
a flat. I just start with a car smart enough to include the jack, like
Knoppix, and recommend others do the same.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Markus Hitter

Am 29.10.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Felix Miata:

 This isn't the first time here mc has been deemed dispensible.

This doesn't surprise me, as mc is a (intentionally old-fashioned)  
file manager an Nautilus covers this functionality already. One  
possible way of dealing with the situation is to add a Ubuntu  
derivate, composed for DOS fans.


MarKus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/





-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 14:23 (GMT+0100) Markus Hitter composed:

 Am 29.10.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Felix Miata:

 This isn't the first time here mc has been deemed dispensible.

 This doesn't surprise me, as mc is a (intentionally old-fashioned) 
 file manager an Nautilus covers this functionality already. One 

What Nautilus covers isn't of much relevance to Kubuntu users, or users with
broken X, and certainly little to none to mc-dependent users.

 possible way of dealing with the situation is to add a Ubuntu  
 derivate, composed for DOS fans.

MC isn't about DOS, nor about old-fashioned. It's about efficiently
performing the panoply of tasks in the OFM repertoire.

http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/index.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodox_file_manager#Orthodox_file_managers

MC needs to be on every live Linux CD.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Thomas Novin
I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
Nautilus.

So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere.

Rgds

-Original Message-
From: Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:41:45 -0400
Mailer: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17)
Gecko/20080913 SeaMonkey/1.1.12 (PmW)

On 2008/10/29 14:23 (GMT+0100) Markus Hitter composed:

 Am 29.10.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Felix Miata:

 This isn't the first time here mc has been deemed dispensible.

 This doesn't surprise me, as mc is a (intentionally old-fashioned) 
 file manager an Nautilus covers this functionality already. One 

What Nautilus covers isn't of much relevance to Kubuntu users, or users with
broken X, and certainly little to none to mc-dependent users.

 possible way of dealing with the situation is to add a Ubuntu  
 derivate, composed for DOS fans.

MC isn't about DOS, nor about old-fashioned. It's about efficiently
performing the panoply of tasks in the OFM repertoire.

http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/index.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodox_file_manager#Orthodox_file_managers

MC needs to be on every live Linux CD.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 14:48 (GMT+0100) Thomas Novin composed:

 I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
 perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
 Nautilus.

How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
never will need to help someone else with broken X.

 So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere.

Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either. Ever heard
of the tyranny of the majority?
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
 On 2008/10/29 14:48 (GMT+0100) Thomas Novin composed:
 
  I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
  perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
  Nautilus.
 
 How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
 never will need to help someone else with broken X.

When X breaks, use bash.  Simple enough.  I think at that point, you're
a bit more worried about fixing X than having a filebrowser that's your
idea of pretty.  Not that bash isn't a dandy file browser already, what
that ls command and all.  Honestly, between ls, mv, and cp, is there
really any need at all for any file browser?  I'm getting the impression
from this thread that MC is for command-line users anyway.

 Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either. Ever heard
 of the tyranny of the majority?

I'm sorry, I didn't know Ubuntu was taking away your right to life by
not shipping one specific file browser that you happen to prefer.  I
also wasn't aware that use of a certain filebrowser made you a minority
usually subject to hate-crimes and thus in need of protection.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi Felix

Felix Miata wrote:
 I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
 perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
 Nautilus.
 
 How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
 never will need to help someone else with broken X.

I'm sorry, but you seem to be missing the point. Firstly, there's not so
much argument about how useful mc is. mc powerful and useful to many.
I've been using it for quite a few things since 1999.

What you have to realise is that the space on the Ubuntu installation
disc is very, very limited. Every few releases, something very important
to a vast majority of users have to be dropped because of the growth of
all the applications. while mc is useful to many, it's certainly not
critical, and the average user will certainly not want to learn mc in
order to fix their X Server. By the way, how does mc fix X servers
anyway? You're hitting quite hard on that point and I'm not quite sure
how mc would make it easier for users to fix an X server. That's what
things like the failsafe X session are for, unless you're refering to
mcedit being a more intuitive editor for new users?

-Jonathan

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 17:18 (GMT+0200) Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) composed:

 Felix Miata wrote:

 I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
 perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
 Nautilus.

 How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
 never will need to help someone else with broken X.

 I'm sorry, but you seem to be missing the point. Firstly, there's not so
 much argument about how useful mc is. mc powerful and useful to many.
 I've been using it for quite a few things since 1999.

I use it routinely, since 1986, when I first discovered NC, instead of
using a bunch of other things I don't need to have or learn precisely because
I have it. Knowing how to use OFMs has obviated more than token need to
learn tools non-OFM bash users take for granted, and GUI users have no
knowledge of or interest in.

 What you have to realise is that the space on the Ubuntu installation
 disc is very, very limited.

This is ancient history that comes up every time some again asks to have it
included by default. Those who don't use an OFM cannot appreciate the
extraordinary value of an OFM. Thus, the tyranny of the majority rules
neither mc nor any other OFM can live on a live buntu CD. Klaus Knopper knows
its value, which makes his space-limited live CDs the live Linux media of
choice for those in the know.

 You're hitting quite hard on that point and I'm not quite sure
 how mc would make it easier for users to fix an X server.

Automatic tools for fixing X are nice when they work, but it's often the case
that various and sundry things that a minor text edit would fix are
impossible to fix with a fancy tool. Similar for networking. Though you may
have X working, a telephone fix is often much easier navigating to a text
file and changing a character or three than explaining how to grunge through
yet another X with different menus and app names than the last.

 That's what
 things like the failsafe X session are for, unless you're refering to
 mcedit being a more intuitive editor for new users?

It's rare for any tool to do more than a few things well, if even more than
one. OFMs are such exceptions. The built-in FTP for fetching broken packages
is easy to use, as that process is the same as fetching a file on a local
filesystem, which is just as easy as in a GUI, having the advantage of a GUI
in visually depicting the relationship of files and directories to each
other, and making navigation a breeze. That an intuitive text editor is built
in goes without saying. A couple of keystrokes, and you have an in place copy
of the original, after which you edit and test, and copy the original back if
it didn't help, with another very few keystrokes, quite unlike cp/mv/vi, etc.

Helping a user in need over the phone to fix things like X or networking is
easier if you can limit to one easy to use tool that requires a lot fewer
steps to accomplish a difficult task. When you do it in mc you've taught a
user to help himself, but that learning is only later useful in an
environment that includes that tool.

Really, it's a total waste of time to discuss OFMs with OFM non-users. People
can't get what they're about if they don't use them. Only with routine use
can anyone grasp just how valuable they really are, and now indispensable
they are to those few who do depend on them.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 10:37 (GMT-0400) Mackenzie Morgan composed:

 On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:

 How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
 never will need to help someone else with broken X.

 When X breaks, use bash.  Simple enough.

Wrong. Not simple, unless you're familiar with it. OFM use obviates most need
to know  bash and the many tools bash users need to accomplish useful work.
In 20+ years of OFM use, I've found little need to use or learn many tools
for both cmdline and X, as OFM incorporates so many necessaries and works
regardless where you are, be it Windoz, DOS, cmdline, XFCE, Unix or whatever
your favorite or captive environment.

 Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either. Ever heard
 of the tyranny of the majority?

 ...not shipping one specific file browser that you happen to prefer.

I'm not picky. As long as there is some OFM that works the same on both
cmdline and X on the live CD, I'm OK with it. I'm just not sure there is any
other OFM option but mc in buntu.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Felix Miata [2008-10-29 10:29 -0400]:
 How nice for you that you've never had broken X

But that's not what you asked about? Even if your installed system is
totally broken, the live system will always boot, and seriously, the
chances that X doesn't work in the live system, not even with a boring
800x600 VESA, are so negligible that I wouldn't care. On those systems
you can probably not install Ubuntu/Kubuntu in the first place.

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Henrik Johansson

Hi,

I am sorry to but in like this but this seems like a non-issue really or
have i missed the point entirely?

@Felix: 
You want mc on the CD since you have neither X nor a working network? I
mean 'sudo apt-get install mc' is not really hard to type right?

There are several potential problems with people not having sufficient
rights etc to install and live-cd only servers can of course be a hassle
but is it really such a big problem to either install mc or learn/teach
a few bash cmds and a few moves in another editor?

Is it really on the 8.04 CD? I had to install it manually. 

As for the value of OFM, I would like to emphasize the value power of
bash. You can't beat the bash.

For the record I would just like to say that i wouldn't mind having mc
included, I kind of like it so if there is space let's put it in!

/ Henrik


ons 2008-10-29 klockan 12:08 -0400 skrev Felix Miata:
 On 2008/10/29 17:18 (GMT+0200) Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) composed:
 
  Felix Miata wrote:
 
  I haven't used MC since late 1990's and I can't really say I miss it! I
  perform lots of file-managing tasks every day and I'm quite happy with
  Nautilus.
 
  How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
  never will need to help someone else with broken X.
 
  I'm sorry, but you seem to be missing the point. Firstly, there's not so
  much argument about how useful mc is. mc powerful and useful to many.
  I've been using it for quite a few things since 1999.
 
 I use it routinely, since 1986, when I first discovered NC, instead of
 using a bunch of other things I don't need to have or learn precisely because
 I have it. Knowing how to use OFMs has obviated more than token need to
 learn tools non-OFM bash users take for granted, and GUI users have no
 knowledge of or interest in.
 
  What you have to realise is that the space on the Ubuntu installation
  disc is very, very limited.
 
 This is ancient history that comes up every time some again asks to have it
 included by default. Those who don't use an OFM cannot appreciate the
 extraordinary value of an OFM. Thus, the tyranny of the majority rules
 neither mc nor any other OFM can live on a live buntu CD. Klaus Knopper knows
 its value, which makes his space-limited live CDs the live Linux media of
 choice for those in the know.
 
  You're hitting quite hard on that point and I'm not quite sure
  how mc would make it easier for users to fix an X server.
 
 Automatic tools for fixing X are nice when they work, but it's often the case
 that various and sundry things that a minor text edit would fix are
 impossible to fix with a fancy tool. Similar for networking. Though you may
 have X working, a telephone fix is often much easier navigating to a text
 file and changing a character or three than explaining how to grunge through
 yet another X with different menus and app names than the last.
 
  That's what
  things like the failsafe X session are for, unless you're refering to
  mcedit being a more intuitive editor for new users?
 
 It's rare for any tool to do more than a few things well, if even more than
 one. OFMs are such exceptions. The built-in FTP for fetching broken packages
 is easy to use, as that process is the same as fetching a file on a local
 filesystem, which is just as easy as in a GUI, having the advantage of a GUI
 in visually depicting the relationship of files and directories to each
 other, and making navigation a breeze. That an intuitive text editor is built
 in goes without saying. A couple of keystrokes, and you have an in place copy
 of the original, after which you edit and test, and copy the original back if
 it didn't help, with another very few keystrokes, quite unlike cp/mv/vi, etc.
 
 Helping a user in need over the phone to fix things like X or networking is
 easier if you can limit to one easy to use tool that requires a lot fewer
 steps to accomplish a difficult task. When you do it in mc you've taught a
 user to help himself, but that learning is only later useful in an
 environment that includes that tool.
 
 Really, it's a total waste of time to discuss OFMs with OFM non-users. People
 can't get what they're about if they don't use them. Only with routine use
 can anyone grasp just how valuable they really are, and now indispensable
 they are to those few who do depend on them.
 -- 
 Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
 slow to become angry.James 1:19 NIV
 
  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
 
 Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
 


signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad	meddelandedel
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Phillip Susi
Felix Miata wrote:
 How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will have, and
 never will need to help someone else with broken X.
 
 So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere.
 
 Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either. Ever heard
 of the tyranny of the majority?

How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?  Your argument seems like 
complaining that emacs is not installed on the livecd.  While it is my 
favorite editor, I can get by just fine with pico or even vi if I must 
for rescue/recovery purposes.

At the end of the day if you prefer your rescue/recovery cd to have mc 
on it, then use one that has it.  You mention Knoppix, so go ahead and 
use that if you like it.  Remember: the Ubuntu live cd is primarily a 
demo/install disk rather than a rescue/recovery tool, like Knoppix is.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/29 16:28 (GMT-0400) Phillip Susi composed:

 How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?

It's vital to fixing broken __, __, __, ___, etc., etc. in
generic fashion, and extremely helpful in talking an unfamiliar user through
same. Only one tool is required to find, download, upload, edit, backup, etc,
and it works with or without working X. When it hasn't been in a default
installed, I'll be one less helper to talk someone in need through an
unnerving and difficult experience.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Chris Jones
Regarding Midnight Commander (mc):

I'm a very heavy user of mc and use it for pretty much anything file
related on a day-to-day basis. And once you get used to it and know how
to harness its power, you'll never use Nautilus (or any other graphical
file manager) again.
And I'm not speaking for a minority here, there's plenty of power users
out there that use it and can't live without it.

But, as far as putting it onto the Live CD, I don't think that's a
priority to be honest. I think there's more important files that could
be added over mc.
And as mentioned already, anyone who uses mc will probably not be using
it off a live cd anyway.

Just my 2 cents for what it's worth.

Regards

-- 
Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:01:33PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
 On 2008/10/29 16:28 (GMT-0400) Phillip Susi composed:
 
  How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?
 
 It's vital to fixing broken __, __, __, ___, etc., etc. in
 generic fashion

(Citation needed)

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 03:11 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:01:33PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
  On 2008/10/29 16:28 (GMT-0400) Phillip Susi composed:
  
   How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X?
  
  It's vital to fixing broken __, __, __, ___, etc., etc. in
  generic fashion
 
 (Citation needed)

http://xkcd.com/285/

FF


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10

2008-10-29 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/30 12:41 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:

 And as mentioned already, anyone who uses mc will probably not be using
 it off a live cd anyway.

Any time I boot a Knoppix CD it's a virtual certainty that the first thing I
do once it finishes booting is start MC. I boot Knoppix to fix things, and MC
is my main tool for generic fixing. A live CD without MC is like a tool chest
that contains no wrench or socket that fits the most common bolt sizes, and
no fitsall wrenches either.
-- 
Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and
slow to become angry.  James 1:19 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss