Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:15:19AM +, Conrad Knauer wrote: Erm... I have no idea how to use chroot ^_-; (I'm really more of an advanced user than a developer :) debootstrap -- 5o Peter.Mann at tuke.sk -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) Two things I noticed which are still there though: The splash screen and Help - About still say OpenOffice.org 2.0 (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 ) The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) Compare: http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png CK On 3/1/07, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list file: deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ Please submit bug reports in the launch bug tracker, but explicitely mention the version you are testing. If you do bug triage on the existing bug reports for OOo, please set the status to Fix committed and mention the version in a comment. upstream changes: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.2.0rc2.html Thanks, Matthias -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up: http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw images get not anti aliasing) Pavel Conrad Knauer schrieb: The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) Two things I noticed which are still there though: The splash screen and Help - About still say OpenOffice.org 2.0 (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 ) The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) Compare: http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png CK On 3/1/07, *Matthias Klose* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list file: deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ Please submit bug reports in the launch bug tracker, but explicitely mention the version you are testing. If you do bug triage on the existing bug reports for OOo, please set the status to Fix committed and mention the version in a comment. upstream changes: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.2.0rc2.html Thanks, Matthias -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
my point with the icons was: can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up: http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw images get not anti aliasing) Pavel Conrad Knauer schrieb: The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) Two things I noticed which are still there though: The splash screen and Help - About still say OpenOffice.org 2.0 (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 ) The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) Compare: http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png CK On 3/1/07, *Matthias Klose* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list file: deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/ Please submit bug reports in the launch bug tracker, but explicitely mention the version you are testing. If you do bug triage on the existing bug reports for OOo, please set the status to Fix committed and mention the version in a comment. upstream changes: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.2.0rc2.html Thanks, Matthias -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
Matthias Klose schrieb: Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: my point with the icons was: can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon set, which I do not want to maintain separately. If we want to include the icons in some way: - rename the icon set - send a patch to accept the new icon set as an alternative, which is turned off by default. - document the changes compared to the industrial icon set; the README inside the zip file is very vague, who did change what and which icons come from which source. IMO in this form it is not redistributable in main or universe. To address this, add a ChangeLog, mentioning the copyright and changes per file. If you want to submit changes to the existing industrial icon set, please send me email for the upstream contacts. Matthias which zip are you referring to? I was talking about: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -r cws_src680_jimmactango2 ooo_custom_images then overwriting the contents of the current images_industrial.zip with the tango images and re-zipping it. (as suggested by jimmac in his blog: http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/2007/Feb/19) this way you dont lose any images and the differences should be also clear. I also assumed that stuff from oo.org cvs has no licensing problems. but I have no I idea how to install the tango icons w/o overwriting industrial. Pavel -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: Matthias Klose schrieb: Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: my point with the icons was: can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon set, which I do not want to maintain separately. If we want to include the icons in some way: - rename the icon set - send a patch to accept the new icon set as an alternative, which is turned off by default. - document the changes compared to the industrial icon set; the README inside the zip file is very vague, who did change what and which icons come from which source. IMO in this form it is not redistributable in main or universe. To address this, add a ChangeLog, mentioning the copyright and changes per file. If you want to submit changes to the existing industrial icon set, please send me email for the upstream contacts. Matthias which zip are you referring to? I was talking about: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -r cws_src680_jimmactango2 ooo_custom_images then overwriting the contents of the current images_industrial.zip with the tango images and re-zipping it. (as suggested by jimmac in his blog: http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/2007/Feb/19) this way you dont lose any images and the differences should be also clear. I also assumed that stuff from oo.org cvs has no licensing problems. but I have no I idea how to install the tango icons w/o overwriting industrial. I did have a look at this icon set, and compared to the ones offered in #42061 by Munchkinguy, these look much more complete. Comparing the tango and human icon sets, there are 1800 differing files, and 680 files missing from the human them. you can find these differences at http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ooicons/ Matthias -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing
On 3/2/07, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) Compare: http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png For some reason the DejaVu Condensed font is selected; I cannot reproduce that. Could you recheck with a new installation (in a chroot)? Erm... I have no idea how to use chroot ^_-; (I'm really more of an advanced user than a developer :) However, here's how to easily reproduce it on my hardware: - run the Ubuntu Feisty Herd 5 live cd - try OOo 2.1; note the default selected font is DejaVu Sans Condensed - add the OOo 2.2 repo and upgrade OOo packages - try OOo 2.2; note the default selected font is still DejaVu Sans Condensed CK (writing this from the Live CD environment; I'll FTP up a pic in a sec) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
