[Bug 876666] [NEW] Ubuntu classic missing in Ubuntu 11.10
Public bug reported: I am sticking my neck out and reporting the omission of desktop choice when logging in as a bug. The Unity interface is more or less impossible to use therefor I feel it is essential to maintain the old interface for the following reasons: 1. It has structured program groups which is one of the most important features compared with MS windows 2. It uses the desktop more efficiently than the Unity interface (configurable and hide menues, smaller icons etc) 3. Faster - the new interface is really slow 4. Absolutely timewaisting to find applications - close to impossible Also - login shows user id's again which is a security exposure and not only that - it also adds the guest login which is a security nightmare. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87 Title: Ubuntu classic missing in Ubuntu 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/87/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723024] Re: Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25
Found the problem - previous version of Evolution handled all settings in the main window settings dialouge. For some reason those settings does not take effect in the new/ reply mail window. Needed to do the SSL settings there as well. I would still classify this as a bug since the new behaviour is rather illogical and differs from previous versions. I fail to see any reason for not making all communication settings (in this case setting for the smtp server) in one place, i.e. the Evolution main window. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723024 Title: Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723024] [NEW] Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution 2.30.3 (Ubuntu 10.10) has a problem with sending secure mail (ssl) when klicking reply to a mail - interesting enough creating a new mail works fine !!! Previous version of Evolution (Ubuntu 10.04) worked fine. Using reply to a mail Evolution sends the mail on port 25 even though settings says ssl (port 465). Creating a new mail and sending it works fine. My mail carrier also requires authentication. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution 2.30.3-1ubuntu7.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.44-generic 2.6.35.10 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Feb 22 10:04:01 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution ProcEnviron: LANG=sv_SE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1786): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1806): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != NULL' failed ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723024 Title: Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723024] Re: Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723024 Title: Mail reply does not send mail on ssl port - uses port 25 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 305723] Re: MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers
Hi, problem is fixed since 9.04. Havent 8.10 to test on anymore. Regards Thomas fre 2010-01-29 klockan 19:11 + skrev Tony Espy: @Thomas_a55 Please re-test with Karmic / 9.10 and let us know if it's still a problem. As Intrepid / 8.10 isn't an LTS release and is over a 1 1/2 old, there's little chance this problem would get fixed as an SRU. For more information on Ubuntu's software stable release update policy, please see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177026] Re: palm z22 won't sync
I can confirm this bug on Ubuntu 9.04 desktop (kernel 2.6.28-15-generic) everything updated with a Palm LifeDrive. Complete message: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd gpilotd rqt 194 rq 1 len 2 ret -108 If you need any more info or testing I am all yours. Regards Thomas -- palm z22 won't sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305723] Re: MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers
** Description changed: Ubuntu 8.10 (no problems with any previous release from 6.06) sets MTU size to 576 (ifconfig) on wired interface (here eth0) (previous releases takes the MTU value given by router DHCP - in this case 1500) which is to low for many routers. I have tested this with a number of different routers to find an acceptable value - 1000 seems to work on all routers in my collection. First found on a Netgear FVS318V3 (interestingly enough the V1 version of the FVS318 works ok with 8.10). Any way 8.10 should take the MTU value sent by DHCP if existing - some testing reveals that 8.04 also ignores the MTU value sent by the router (assuming that the router FVS318V3 performs according to documentation and sends MTU size - I have no means of verifying this as of now). Problem symptom is that communication starts up fine but as soon as something larger than 576 comes back it hangs (i.e. no response). Tried to override the MTU value statically but it gets ignored. Suggest setting a value around 1000 as default. Further more the PC:S I have tested this on has Gigabit cards - 576 is to low for those speeds. Maybe a default setting that varies with the potential speed of the card would be nice ? + + REQUESTED INFO: + I am glad to hear that 8.10 should not pick MTU size of 576, unfortunately I have had it on all 3 machines I have tested it on - all with different motherboards and processors (P4 and AMD 3000+) all with different network cards. Picking one (HP DX5150MT with AMD3000+) processor - here is the output from lshw: + works11 + description: Desktop Computer + product: IMEDIA D9214 + vendor: PACKARD BELL BV + version: PB80X01591 + serial: 100205570374 + width: 32 bits + capabilities: smbios-2.5 dmi-2.5 smp-1.4 smp + configuration: boot=normal chassis=desktop cpus=2 uuid=001C2503-AAE1-2007-0710-20155900 + *-core +description: Motherboard +product: Berkeley +vendor: Packard Bell BV +physical id: 0 +version: To be filled by O.E.M. +serial: ULPQ72600702 +slot: To Be Filled By O.E.M. + *-firmware + description: BIOS + vendor: American Megatrends Inc. + physical id: 0 + version: PBBERKMB.0400 (06/08/2007) + size: 64KiB + capacity: 448KiB + capabilities: isa pci pnp apm upgrade shadowing escd cdboot bootselect socketedrom edd int13floppy1200 int13floppy720 int13floppy2880 int5printscreen int9keyboard int14serial int17printer int10video acpi usb ls120boot zipboot biosbootspecification + *-cpu:0 + description: CPU + product: Genuine Intel(R) CPU2140 @ 1.60GHz + vendor: Intel Corp. + physical id: 4 + bus info: c...@0 + version: 6.15.2 + serial: -06F2---- + slot: CPU 1 + size: 1600MHz + capacity: 1600MHz + width: 64 bits + clock: 200MHz + capabilities: boot fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx x86-64 constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm cpufreq + configuration: id=0 + *-cache:0 + description: L1 cache + physical id: 5 + slot: L1-Cache + size: 64KiB + capacity: 64KiB + capabilities: internal write-back data + *-cache:1 + description: L2 cache + physical id: 6 + slot: L2-Cache + size: 1MiB + capacity: 1MiB + capabilities: internal write-back instruction + *-cache:2 DISABLED + description: L3 cache + physical id: 7 + slot: L3-Cache + capabilities: internal + *-logicalcpu:0 + description: Logical CPU + physical id: 0.1 + width: 64 bits + capabilities: logical + *-logicalcpu:1 + description: Logical CPU + physical id: 0.2 + width: 64 bits + capabilities: logical + *-memory + description: System Memory + physical id: 30 + slot: System board or motherboard + size: 2GiB + *-bank:0 + description: DIMM DDR Synchronous + product: PartNum0 + vendor: Manufacturer0 + physical id: 0 + serial: SerNum0 + slot: DIMM0 + size: 1GiB + width: 64 bits + *-bank:1 + description: DIMM DDR Synchronous + product: PartNum1 + vendor: Manufacturer1 + physical id: 1 + serial: SerNum1 + slot:
[Bug 305723] Re: MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers
Here is some additional info to the info I update in the description: uname -a Linux works11 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:24:39 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux /var/log/messages (only boot info): [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.00] Linux version 2.6.27-11-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu11) ) #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:24:39 UTC 2009 (Ubuntu 2.6.27-11.27-generic) [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 000e4000 - 0010 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - 6ffb (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 6ffb - 6ffbe000 (ACPI data) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 6ffbe000 - 6fff (ACPI NVS) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 6fff - 7000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: ff78 - 0001 (reserved) [0.00] DMI present. [0.00] AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working it around. [0.00] last_pfn = 0x6ffb0 max_arch_pfn = 0x10 [0.00] kernel direct mapping tables up to 3800 @ 1-15000 [0.00] RAMDISK: 3781c000 - 37fef282 [0.00] ACPI: RSDP 000F9A30, 0024 (r2 ACPIAM) [0.00] ACPI: XSDT 6FFB0100, 0054 (r1 PacBel PBDT0004 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: FACP 6FFB0290, 00F4 (r3 PacBel FACP1336 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: DSDT 6FFB05C0, 4ED2 (r1 Berk Berk04000 INTL 20051117) [0.00] ACPI: FACS 6FFBE000, 0040 [0.00] ACPI: APIC 6FFB0390, 006C (r1 PacBel APIC1336 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: MCFG 6FFB0400, 003C (r1 PacBel OEMMCFG 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: SLIC 6FFB0440, 0176 (r1 PacBel PBDT0004 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: OEMB 6FFBE040, 0071 (r1 PacBel OEMB1336 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] ACPI: EPTH 6FFB54A0, 0038 (r1 PacBel OEMHPET 6000708 MSFT 97) [0.00] 895MB HIGHMEM available. [0.00] 896MB LOWMEM available. [0.00] mapped low ram: 0 - 3800 [0.00] low ram: - 3800 [0.00] bootmap 00011000 - 00018000 [0.00] (9 early reservations) == bootmem [00 - 003800] [0.00] #0 [00 - 001000] BIOS data page == [00 - 001000] [0.00] #1 [001000 - 002000]EX TRAMPOLINE == [001000 - 002000] [0.00] #2 [006000 - 007000] TRAMPOLINE == [006000 - 007000] [0.00] #3 [10 - 5c29e0]TEXT DATA BSS == [10 - 5c29e0] [0.00] #4 [003781c000 - 0037fef282] RAMDISK == [003781c000 - 0037fef282] [0.00] #5 [5c3000 - 5c6000]INIT_PG_TABLE == [5c3000 - 5c6000] [0.00] #6 [09fc00 - 10]BIOS reserved == [09fc00 - 10] [0.00] #7 [01 - 011000] PGTABLE == [01 - 011000] [0.00] #8 [011000 - 018000] BOOTMAP == [011000 - 018000] [0.00] found SMP MP-table at [c00ff780] 000ff780 [0.00] Zone PFN ranges: [0.00] DMA 0x0010 - 0x1000 [0.00] Normal 0x1000 - 0x00038000 [0.00] HighMem 0x00038000 - 0x0006ffb0 [0.00] Movable zone start PFN for each node [0.00] early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges [0.00] 0: 0x0010 - 0x009f [0.00] 0: 0x0100 - 0x0006ffb0 [0.00] On node 0 totalpages: 458559 [0.00] free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c048c680, node_mem_map c1000240 [0.00] DMA zone: 3947 pages, LIFO batch:0 [0.00] Normal zone: 223300 pages, LIFO batch:31 [0.00] HighMem zone: 227280 pages, LIFO batch:31 [0.00] ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 [0.00] ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 [0.00] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) [0.00] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) [0.00] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x82] disabled) [0.00] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x83] disabled) [0.00] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) [0.00] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 33, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 [0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) [0.00] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level) [0.00] ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. [0.00] ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. [0.00] ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. [0.00] Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs [0.00] Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP
[Bug 305723] [NEW] MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.10 (no problems with any previous release from 6.06) sets MTU size to 576 (ifconfig) on wired interface (here eth0) (previous releases takes the MTU value given by router DHCP - in this case 1500) which is to low for many routers. I have tested this with a number of different routers to find an acceptable value - 1000 seems to work on all routers in my collection. First found on a Netgear FVS318V3 (interestingly enough the V1 version of the FVS318 works ok with 8.10). Any way 8.10 should take the MTU value sent by DHCP if existing - some testing reveals that 8.04 also ignores the MTU value sent by the router (assuming that the router FVS318V3 performs according to documentation and sends MTU size - I have no means of verifying this as of now). Problem symptom is that communication starts up fine but as soon as something larger than 576 comes back it hangs (i.e. no response). Tried to override the MTU value statically but it gets ignored. Suggest setting a value around 1000 as default. Further more the PC:S I have tested this on has Gigabit cards - 576 is to low for those speeds. Maybe a default setting that varies with the potential speed of the card would be nice ? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- MTU in 8.10 set to 576/ ignores override/ does not work with a lot of routers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 99681] Re: Unexpected gok crash directly after login
Hi pedro,you may close it - circumvented using other sw. The bug may persist though - have not tested it recently.RegardsThomas-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:58:13 + Subject: [Bug 99681] Re: Unexpected gok crash directly after login Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: gok (Ubuntu)Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop BugsStatus: New = Incomplete -- Unexpected gok crash directly after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99681 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. _ Learn. Laugh. Share. Reallivemoms is right place! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHMloc=us -- Unexpected gok crash directly after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 81170] Re: [feisty] etodo conduit times out when syncing with apalm dev
I can agree to todo- items without a date but the sync was made via USB. Regards Thomas _ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Parkcp=33.832922~-117.915659style=rlvl=13tilt=-90dir=0alt=-1000scene=1118863encType=1FORM=MGAC01 -- [feisty] etodo conduit times out when syncing with a palm device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99684] Re: Backspace key not ignored rather than displaying previous url in Firefox 2.0.0.3
I originally reported this as a bug for the simple reason that it is a changed behavior from previous version. I have worked rather long in the IT industry and from my experience the worst thing a software developer can do is changing user interface behavior between releases, especially when it concerns shortcuts and keystrokes in general. What a user prefers in general is besides the point, even though I do not believe that anyone can say what users want or prefers - look at Microsofts usability lab - they change Words menues around for every release claiming that the usability lab experience indicates that the new look is better... -- Backspace key not ignored rather than displaying previous url in Firefox 2.0.0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103226] Re: gnome-pilot hangs synchronizing with 3com Pilot m125
** Description changed: Hi, there seems to be a consistent and repeatable problem with the gnome- pilot synchronizing with my palmpilot m125 (only one I have so have not tried with other model) PalmOS 4.0.1 - it always hangs synchronizing the todo- list. The m125 reports a time out. Inaktivating the todo- list sync it works fine with calendar, adress and memo. Palm connected via a USB 1.1 port, only info in messages: [ 309.983820] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2 [ 376.971064] usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 [ 377.140069] usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 380.764132] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 3 Please, do not hesitate to contact me with any debug etc. procedures you might want to run. + + Complementary info - last entries before core - I can not determine if this is same problem as bug #81170. Abend message is same but preceeding info differs: + etodoconduit-Message: pre_sync: ToDo Conduit v.0.1.6 + etodoconduit-Message: ToDo Conduit v.0.1.6 + etodoconduit-Message: Using timezone: /softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/Europe/Stockholm + etodoconduit-Message: timezone set to : /softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/Europe/Stockholm + etodoconduit-Message: Got default component: 0x8123ca8 + etodoconduit-Message: num_records: 1 + add_records: 1 + mod_records: 0 + del_records: 0 + + etodoconduit-Message: Current URI + file:///home/thomas/.evolution/tasks/local/system () + + etodoconduit-Message: doing slow sync + + etodoconduit-Message: match: looking for local copy of [1 -1 1 0 'Don't + forget to register!' 'To register your Palm\x99 handheld electronically, + you must have an Internet connection or a modem connected to your + computer. + + Or if you prefer, you can fill out and send the mail-in registration + card included in your Palm package. + + Special rewards only for registered users: + + -FREE software programs * + -Upgrade information + -Important updates + + * For a complete list of free software, go to www.palm.com/eregdownload + ' 0] + + etodoconduit-Message: add_record: adding [1 -1 1 0 'Don't forget to + register!' 'To register your Palm\x99 handheld electronically, you must + have an Internet connection or a modem connected to your computer. + + Or if you prefer, you can fill out and send the mail-in registration + card included in your Palm package. + + Special rewards only for registered users: + + -FREE software programs * + -Upgrade information + -Important updates + + * For a complete list of free software, go to www.palm.com/eregdownload + ' 0] to desktop + + *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/gpilotd terminated + Aborted (core dumped) -- gnome-pilot hangs synchronizing with 3com Pilot m125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103220] [apport] hpfax crashed with NameError in getVersionTuple()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hplip No other info ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 5 10:28:33 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/cups/backend/hpfax InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 Package: hplip 1.7.1-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: python /usr/lib/cups/backend/hpfax ProcCwd: / ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin PythonArgs: ['/usr/lib/cups/backend/hpfax'] SourcePackage: hplip Uname: Linux works04 2.6.20-13-386 #2 Sun Mar 25 00:18:53 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: hplip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] hpfax crashed with NameError in getVersionTuple() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103226] gnome-pilot hangs synchronizing with 3com Pilot m125
Public bug reported: Hi, there seems to be a consistent and repeatable problem with the gnome- pilot synchronizing with my palmpilot m125 (only one I have so have not tried with other model) PalmOS 4.0.1 - it always hangs synchronizing the todo- list. The m125 reports a time out. Inaktivating the todo- list sync it works fine with calendar, adress and memo. Palm connected via a USB 1.1 port, only info in messages: [ 309.983820] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2 [ 376.971064] usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 [ 377.140069] usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 380.764132] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 3 Please, do not hesitate to contact me with any debug etc. procedures you might want to run. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gnome-pilot hangs synchronizing with 3com Pilot m125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103220] Re: [apport] hpfax crashed with NameError in getVersionTuple()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7154204/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7154205/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7154206/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7154207/Traceback.txt -- [apport] hpfax crashed with NameError in getVersionTuple() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99682] Unexpected gok crash directly after login
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gok Not sure if duplicate so I put it in. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 31 21:19:18 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gok Package: gok 1.2.3-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gok -s ProcCwd: /home/thomas ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=sv_SE:sv:en_GB:en PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gok Stacktrace: #0 0x0806dba3 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ?? () ThreadStacktrace: . Thread 1 (process 10348): #0 0x0806dba3 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x in ?? () Uname: Linux works04 2.6.20-13-386 #2 Sun Mar 25 00:18:53 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Unexpected gok crash directly after login https://launchpad.net/bugs/99682 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99681] Unexpected gok crash directly after login
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gok Not sure if duplicate so I put it in. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 31 21:19:18 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gok Package: gok 1.2.3-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gok -s ProcCwd: /home/thomas ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=sv_SE:sv:en_GB:en PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gok Stacktrace: #0 0x0806dba3 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ?? () ThreadStacktrace: . Thread 1 (process 10348): #0 0x0806dba3 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x in ?? () Uname: Linux works04 2.6.20-13-386 #2 Sun Mar 25 00:18:53 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Unexpected gok crash directly after login https://launchpad.net/bugs/99681 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99681] Re: Unexpected gok crash directly after login
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098130/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098133/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098134/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098136/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098137/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7098138/Registers.txt -- Unexpected gok crash directly after login https://launchpad.net/bugs/99681 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99684] Backspace key not ignored rather than displaying previous url in Firefox 2.0.0.3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-firefox In previous version (Ubuntu 6.0.1 -- upgraded to 6.10 and then to 7.04 beta - i.e. might have occured in 6.10) the backspace key in Firefox gave previously browsed URL. In 2.0.0.3 it is not active (i.e. no reaction on pressing backspace key). Low prio but rather annoying. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Backspace key not ignored rather than displaying previous url in Firefox 2.0.0.3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/99684 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
