Re: Javascript tool that generates the lengthy set of parameters available for ubuntu-vm-builder

2011-05-06 Thread Dan Sheffner
The site still works fine.  The only thing I would change is hardy to lucid
since lucid is the next LTS (long term support).

sudo ubuntu-vm-builder kvm lucid --arch 'amd64'  --mem '128'  --rootsize
'4096'  --swapsize '1024'  --kernel-flavour 'generic'  --hostname 'ubuntu'
--mirror 'http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu'  --components 'main'  --name
'Joe Ubuntu'  --user 'ubuntu'  --pass 'ubuntu'  --ip '192.168.1.51'  --mask
'255.255.255.0'  --gw '192.168.1.1'  --dns '192.168.1.1'


On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Christophe Sauthier 
christophe.sauth...@objectif-libre.com wrote:

 Hi,

 On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:45 AM,  jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
  Hi Dustin.
 
  Just a reminder:
  http://people.canonical.com/~kirkland/ubuntu-vm-builder.html is no
 longer up
  to date.  Can it still be used or is it completely outdated?

 This is something that we (in my company) have started to work on
 lately. I'll try to publish it (in a new url) or provide to dustin
 next week.

 All the best,

Christophe
 ---
 Christophe Sauthier   -  06 16 98 63 96
 Objectif Libre  www.objectif-libre.com
 Services et Formations Open Source

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Good book recommendations ?

2011-03-09 Thread Dan Sheffner
Mark,

I would recommend The official Ubuntu server book:
http://www.amazon.com/Official-Ubuntu-Server-Book-2nd/dp/0137081332/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1299693203sr=8-1

Deployments I created a wiki page that completely automates an install from
start to finish for lucid:
https://www.frackingtubes.com/wiki/index.php/Ubuntu_preseed.cfg_installs_off_PXE_Boot
The book also talks about this.

automated backup and recovery is also explained allot in the book.

I don't specifically use Nagios but buying a book specifically on it
will defiantly give you more than you ever wanted to know:
http://www.amazon.com/Nagios-Network-Monitoring-Wolfgang-Barth/dp/1593270704

I use http://zabbix.org but I'm probably in the minority here.  I hear allot
of people use Nagios.  Zabbix does everything I need for monitoring.

For configuration management allot of people are using puppet 
chef. Neither of which I have used but are on my list to learn.

If you know specifically at what book you want to buy I would just ask on
this email thread.  I have spent a small fortune on tech books over the
years.

~Dan



On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Mark van Harmelen m...@cs.man.ac.ukwrote:

 Hi everyone

 We are getting more serious about our random collection of servers, all
 running ubuntu server 10.04+, and want to buy some books that we can use to
 build our knowledge and skills.

 Particularly we are interested in topics like automated deployment,
 configuration management, and automated backup and recovery. Nagios is also
 lurking in the backs of our minds.

 Does anyone have any recommendations for us please?

 Thanks
 Mark

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: SSL by default for all packaged web apps?

2011-03-01 Thread Dan Sheffner
+1 for SSL of packages.

A compromise would just be to run the entire mirror both http  https with a
self signed cert and leave the default http.

The packages that are coming from the ubuntu mirror are very important
especially since so many companies use ubuntu in production environments.

As for the whole self signed vs. signed by a company I don't really care and
I don't think many do either.  People that modify the packages to use SSL
will know why and what they are doing. Those who don't will just default to
http.

~Dan

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Etienne Goyer
etienne.go...@canonical.comwrote:

 On 11-03-01 06:39 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
  On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:04 -0500, Etienne Goyer wrote:
  We should not turn on SSL by default with self-signed certificates.
 That
  is insecure and is not a configuration that should be encouraged.
 
  There is two things there:
 
  1. Encrypting communication between the client and the server (notably
  to protect the credential exchange from eavesdropping).
 
  2. Preventing MitM by authenticating the server.
 
 
  Using SSL with self-signed certificate doesn't address 2., but it does
  address 1.  From my perspective, it's an incremental improvement over
  plain-text HTTP.  So, why not?
 
  I'm not quite sure under which circumstance 1 would be a problem but 2
  would not. When you're on a trusted network? If you're on a trusted
  network, you probably don't need SSL in the first place.

 There's no such thing as a trusted network.  I am just saying that
 encrypting traffic is an incremental improvement over plain-text HTTP.

  The problem here is that turning it on by default will instill a false
  sense of security into people's minds. You are telling them that it's
  acceptable to bypass the important warnings and to click the OK button
  in Firefox when they connect the first time. You are showing them the
  lock icon in Firefox indicating to them that they're on a secure
  connection, when in fact, that's not the case...

 Yet, most internal web service (those that aren't public-facing) require
 the end-user to dismiss a self-signed certificate already.  That's what
 I see out there.  Turning SSL on by default would not be a regression,
 it would be an incremental improvement over plain-text HTTP.


  I have had that argument with a few people over the years.  Fact is, at
  least for non publicly facing web services, most people will continue to
  use self-signed certificates for the simple reason that getting a
  valid certificate (or setting up your own CA) is a huge hassle, and
  not even always possible.
 
  They are trading off security to save $50 and 30 minutes of work.
  Unless, of course, you are getting every single user to manually
  validate the fingerprint every time they click that Accept button.

 And this is the crux of the matter.  I have had this argument served
 recently by obnoxious developers of an application that would not run
 without a valid SSL certificate, and it was of no help to me.  On
 internal network, organisation of all size often use non-registred
 domain name.  You cannot get a valid SSL certification signed by a CA
 for a .silly domain, however hard you try.  Plus, it's often much more
 involved that 50$ and 30 minutes.  Sometime, it requires you seek
 approval from procurement, IT security or net ops department to buy a
 certificate in the name of your org.


  I would even go as far as arguing that trying to discourage people from
  using self-signed certificate through systemic measure is a waste of
  time, because most people just do not understand the implication.
  Putting the cart before the horses and stuff.
 
  Setting up an insecure SSL connection by default, and giving them the
  impression of being encrypted properly is security theatre. This isn't
  something we should be recommending, or doing by default. If someone
  decides that self-signed certificates are good enough for them, they
  should set it up themselves and face the consequences.

 And that is what most people are currently doing, in fact.  They would
 be none the worst if we enabled SSL by default.

 But, in the end, I do not care much and I am not going to argue any more
 in favor of the proposal.  It's just an incremental usability
 improvement, like ssh-installed-by-default would have been.  We could
 nitpick all night long about the fine point of security vs usability,
 but it's not very productive.


 --
 Etienne Goyer
 Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd
 Ubuntu Certified Instructor   -LPIC-3

  ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: actual IP not logged when requests come forwarded by a reverse proxy

2011-02-18 Thread Dan Sheffner
Tapas,

http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/

you want to enable this module and configure it correctly.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.comwrote:

 My apache2.conf
 http://pastebin.com/uTVKt1wD
 and apacche vhost file
 http://pastebin.com/QDd3LDZ4
 the apche2.conf and vhost file I gave the link are the machine on LAN
 where site is actually hosted.
 When some one from internet access the site then I expect a log of IP in
 access.log
 instead of which I see the IP of machine which is working as Reverse
 Proxy server for all such requests.
 What mistake did I do above.

 --

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: tomcat startup script not working at boot

2011-02-17 Thread Dan Sheffner
I have always had problems stopping tomcat 5 with any init script.

The free community version of the java service wrapper works great.  It
comes with its own init script and has many additional features that I
needed.

http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/download.jsp

how to configure tomcat:

http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/integrate-start-stop-nix.html

Then I do:

update-rc.d tomcat defaults

which is for the old System-V init and not upstart but still works for 10.04
ubuntu.






On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Peter Matulis
 peter.matu...@canonical.com wrote:
  On 11-02-17 09:03 AM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
  I am having problems in starting tomcat at boot time with an automated
  script of mine.
 
  [...]
 
  Why do you need a custom startup script?
 
  --
  Peter
 

 Then how will it work?
 I looked here
 http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/all/tomcat6/filelist
 can I see the file mentioned /etc/init.d/tomcat6
 some where so that I understand where is my script failing?
 --

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: server installation is not reading the preseed file

2011-02-15 Thread Dan Sheffner
Asif,

Are you trying to boot off PXE boot?  I actually wrote a small wiki entry
for lucid 64 bit.

https://www.frackingtubes.com/wiki/index.php/Ubuntu_preseed.cfg_installs_off_PXE_Boot

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have this isolinux.cfg file but my installation is not reading the
 preseed.cfg file from my custom cd image.

 I built it using this method
 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallCDCustomization

 # cat /opt/image/isolinux/isolinux.cfg
 serial 0
 console 0
 prompt 1
 default install
 label install
  menu label ^Install Ubuntu Server
  kernel /install/vmlinuz
  append  preseed/file=/cdrom/preseed.cfg initrd=/install/initrd.gz --
 console=ttyS0,9600n8


 # cat /opt/image/preseed.cfg file looks like this

 d-i debian-installer/locale string en_US
 d-i console-keymaps-at/keymap select us
 d-i netcfg/disable_dhcp boolean true
 d-i netcfg/get_nameservers  string  192.168.3.65
 d-i netcfg/get_ipaddressstring  192.168.0.28
 d-i netcfg/get_netmask  string  255.255.255.0
 d-i netcfg/get_gateway  string  192.168.0.1
 d-i netcfg/confirm_static   boolean true
 d-i mirror/http/proxy   string
 d-i netcfg/choose_interface select eth0
 d-i netcfg/wireless_wep string
 d-i netcfg/get_hostname string host.example.net
 d-i netcfg/get_domain   string example.net
 d-i netcfg/wireless_wep string
 d-i anna/choose_modules string network-console
 d-i network-console/password password secret
 d-i network-console/password-again password secret

 But my installation still asked me about all these.

 I am trying to install ubuntu lucid 64bit server


 content of the cd image

 /opt/images# ls
 README.diskdefines  dists  isolinuxpics  preseed  ubuntu
 cdromupgradedocinstall  md5sum.txt  pool
  preseed.cfg

 Thanks for the help.

 --
 Asif Iqbal
 PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Bulk updating dozens of (not identical) servers

2011-01-27 Thread Dan Sheffner
I have used Capistrano.  It is a ruby gem that enables concurrent commands
to be executed across any number of servers using SSH. More info can be
found here:

https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/wiki

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado 
carloscarn...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi there,

 the number of servers we have in my organization -- both physical and
 virtual -- is slowly increasing at a steady pace, and the trend will
 continue for the foreseeable future. It has come to the point that
 apt-get upgrading  updating each one individually, and manually, is
 really time consuming and prone to errors. We're looking into stuff
 like Puppet and Cfengine, and it seems that either will do fine, but
 we have this feeling or notion that they're a little bit heavyweight
 for our needs. Not to mention the learning curve.

 So, in the context of *only* dealing with installed packages updates
 in an automated way[1] and having 8.04 and 10.04 LTS releases in
 service, do you guys recommend anything? Did you write custom code?
 Has anyone seen Fabric in the context of systems administration?

  [1] Please note that automated here really means bulk updating started
   from a command (or thingie) given by an administrator. It should not
   be interpreted as autonomously contacting repos.

 Thanks in advance,
 Carlos.

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Hard disk high avalibity

2011-01-20 Thread Dan Sheffner
I have used rsync with cron.  Since you can copy only the data that has
changed you can run this often.  I have mine set as */5 * * * *

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Peter Clapham p...@sanger.ac.uk wrote:


  Looks like gsync could do this.

 http://open.gandi.net/


 Cheers, /N


 The issue with various syncs are that you need to be there to both perform
 the switch over following a failure and you also need to manually take care
 that split brain is avoided. This is less of an issue with a hard fail but a
 soft fail can be more problematic.

 Using DRBD is a standard config with (the rightly corrected) pacemaker.
 This setup will take care of soft fails and auto failover for you if you
 configure it to use a quorum device. All details are available in the
 initial link

 Good luck

 Pete



 --
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited,
 a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered
 in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road,
 London, NW1 2BE.
 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: invalid response from Proxy dns lookup failure in my domains

2011-01-10 Thread Dan Sheffner
A work around the DNS is editing the /etc/hosts file and hard coding your
servers there.  Do you have access to this file?


On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi all.
  The problem I am reporting is not very clearly evident to me.
  I have a virtualization setup where in I had configured in 4 virtual
  machines (which serve 4 different websites)  available to internet via
  a
  Reverse Proxy on the Host OS (bare metal) I use Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit
  server edition and kvm for this setup.
 
  We have not changed any of the server configurations from past 6
  months since things were working properly without any problem on this
  server.
  The sites are available to people as
 
 
  http://site1.myserver.com -- No problem
  http://site1.myserver.com/app1 -- Gives problem till weekend there
  was no problem
 
  http://site4.myserver.com   --Is also giving problem till this Sunday
  9 Jan there were no problem.
 
  Here are the error messages which I see in Apache logs
 
  Mon Jan 10 17:07:05 2011] [error] [client 172.21.100.250] proxy: DNS
  lookup failure for: site4.myserver.com returned by /
  [Mon Jan 10 17:07:06 2011] [error] [client 172.21.100.250] proxy: DNS
  lookup failure for: site4.myserver.com returned by /
 
  and for site1.myserver.com/app1 also I get same error
 
  [Mon Jan 10 17:06:01 2011] [error] [client 172.21.100.250] proxy: DNS
  lookup failure for: site1.myserver.com returned by /app1/
  [Mon Jan 10 17:06:01 2011] [error] [client 172.21.100.250] proxy: DNS
  lookup failure for: site1.myserver.com returned by /app1/
  [Mon Jan 10 17:06:02 2011] [error] [client 172.21.100.250] proxy: DNS
  lookup failure for: site1.myserver.com returned by /app1/
 
 
  How ever when some one tries to access http://site1.myserver.com there
  is no error at all.
  Also if I access  http://site5.somebody_server.com (which is same as
  http://site4.myserver.com pointing to same public IP) but on some body
  elses server
  then there is no problem at all and the site is very clearly visible.
 
 
  Let me know what more should I look for I have no clue of this problem.
  Because these error messages which I just report in this thread were
  not at all present until today  morning.
 
 
 
  --
 

 Ok after having a long trouble shooting hours found the root cause
  my proxy pass entries look as follows

  ProxyPass /app1 http://192.168.1.3:8080/app1
  ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3
  ProxyPassReverse /app1 http://192.168.1.3:8080/app1
  ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3

 If I use the entries as above then some one from internet is able to
 access the sites.But from within LAN people are unable to access it.

 How ever if I use

  ProxyPass /app1 http://site1.myserver.com:8080/app1
  ProxyPass / http://site1.myserver.com
  ProxyPassReverse /app1 http://site1.myserver.com:8080/app1
  ProxyPassReverse / http://site1.myserver.com

 then things work on LAN but from internet it is not accessible and
 errors are the ones I mentioned above in the thread.

 What can be a solution in this case as I do not have a DNS at my
 disposal I am simply not allowed to have one.
 Can some one suggest any thing?

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: virt manager migration option greyed out on Ubuntu 10.04 server edition

2011-01-06 Thread Dan Sheffner
I have always had problems with this feature.  See this thread:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1152271

Some of the minimum requirements are the two servers sharing the same
storage.  I have tried w/ NFS. Would love to know your finding as well.  I
think many people are moving to UEC for live VM migration.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.comwrote:

 I am testing server migration on a Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server
 edition.Where I have virt-manager installed.
 How ever when I choose a VM and try attempt for migration of hot vm I
 see the option of migration greyed out.
 Is this feature not supported currently in virt-manager?
 Do I necessarily need to connect to another server.
 I am also looking for converting the Guest OS in LVM to qemu image
 where in I can export this qemu image
 or some other format which is suitable to be used on some other
 hypervisor.Is it not possible to achieve that in currently  in
 virt-manager.
 virt-manager 0.8.2

 --

 Tapas
 http://mightydreams.blogspot.com

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Not able to boot a software raid installation - Ubuntu 10.04.1 i386

2011-01-02 Thread Dan Sheffner
I used to have problems booting software raid with ubuntu 8.04.  The fix I
found was creating a third device for /boot/ partition.  512MB is plenty big
for the /boot/ partition.

So my structure was like this:
/dev/md0 /boot/
/dev/md1 Swap
/dev/md2 /


On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Benjamin Griese der.dar...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello,

 there seems to be a problem with your grub configuration.

 It looks like grub has problems to load the /boot related files which are
 misconfigured to be located on fd0.
 Please boot into a live environment and check your grub.cfg and post the
 approriate lines.

 Something you should also check is:

 Did you try to create a seperate boot partition on each disk which you may
 want to mirror?
 Are there any other disks installed besides your two IDEs?
 And is the BIOS trying to load the MBR off of these disks which hold a
 faulty config?

 Summary: Please give us some more information.

 Bye, benjamin


 On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 01:16, Andres Tarallo atara...@acm.org wrote:

 H!!! Happy new year !!!

 I'm setting a software raid in a small home server, with an old dell
 optiplex GX110.The installation goes smoothly,but I can't boot into
 the system.

  I've installed two identical Hard Drives, both as primary drives in
 the respective IDE controllers. There I've created identical partions
 in each disk. One partition for /, the other for swap. After the
 partitions were created I've made the MD devices, /dev/md0 is / and
 /dev/md1 is swap. The installation continued loaded all packages then
 installed grub. No errors till there. When I take out the installation
 CD and go to boot the newly installed system I get:

 Booting from local disk...
 error: fd0 read error.
 error: no such disk
 grub rescue

 Any help will be appreciated, apologise poor English

 Andrés Tarallo

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam




 --
 To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
 to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra


 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Why choosing Ubuntu JeOS for Virtual Appliance ?

2011-01-01 Thread Dan Sheffner
I have actually used Ubuntu, Gentoo, and Red Hat in production environments.
All of them have quirks about each.

Gentoo is completely compiled from source.  So you may see a little
performance gain in doing that but the draw back is patching takes forever.
At the time I had a distcc cluster helping compile the code but even then
patching was taking way too long.  If you are running servers that don't
require 24/7/365 services and can spend hours patching, gentoo may be a good
option though most of the time this isn't the case.  Also when the emerge
fails (Gentoo update system)  it is up to the Gentoo community to help fix
these problems.  I have seen emerge fail a handful of times while apt-get
update/upgrade I have never seen fail.

Another thing I require is to have a local mirror for updating my servers.
Ubuntu/Debian are great about this because I can update the local mirror,
patch development and testing environments, test to make sure nothing
breaks, and then patch production.  Then repeat.

Red Hat requires subscription fees in order to update the servers. So I
don't believe you can actually run a local mirror.  I could be wrong but
since I don't want the companies I work for spending a fortune on operating
systems I use Ubuntu.  Another thing I really like is that Ubuntu has a
server edition while the default Red Hat installs include a GUI.  I never
need a GUI on my servers and I don't want the overhead of even running one
on my servers.  Yes you can remove the GUI stuff during the install but that
is why I love the Ubuntu Server edition. Just the minimum set of packages in
order to run the server efficiently.

Ubuntu server edition is such a great product for enterprise solutions.  I
have over 50 production servers and probably another 200 in testing 
development between Amazon EC2 and a data center I use.  Ubuntu Server
edition is certainly not a student/homePC os. I also absolutely love the LTS
(Long Term Support) editions.  Knowing I can focus on the services that the
server is running and know it will be supported for 5 years is so nice.

Ubuntu will be my choice for linux distro for the rest of my life.  Ubuntu
has done an excellent job.





On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eliezer elie...@fullmetal1.dyndns.orgwrote:

 i would ask him to show me the differences between ubuntu and RH or SUSE.
 it's almost the same kernel and almost the same software.
 the only thing is that there are other people working on maintaining the
 release packages and other stuff.


 i must say that john  just kicked everything from your client words!!

 i had an thing with a friend at work about comparing gentoo and ubuntu on
 performance and scalability,
 if you want to take a system that works period you use ubuntu.
 if you want to start from almost scratch you will use gentoo.
 but just remember that every time you need to install new software or just
 update something you will need to recompile many things.
 and one of that major things about OS is that you can use and maintain it
 almost instantly.

 well my opinion




 On 08/12/2010 17:47, Loïc de la Goutte wrote:

 Hi Everybody,

 My company  provides a Virtual Appliance based on Ubuntu JeOS.

 1. Unfortunately, I am challenged by one of our customers who asks :
 “Why did you build your  appliance on Ubuntu, as my vision is that
 Ubuntu is considered on the market place more as a student/homePC OS
 than an enterprise-OS as RedHat ?”.

 I want to convince him that we have objectively done the good choice.

 So, do you have such a white paper, that could lists :

 - Key differentiators of Ubuntu JeOS ?

 - VMware recommendation ?

 - List of Enterprise-grade appliances built over Ubunto JeOS ?

 Thanks in advance,

 Regards from Paris, France.

 cid:image001.jpg@01CB5E4D.25DD3D60

 Loïc DE LA GOUTTE

 Director of Product Management,

 Capacity Management EMEA

 *Web* www.systar.com http://www.systar.com/


 *Tel*+33 (0)1 49 11 45 28

 *Cell* +33 (0)6 34 99 33 30




 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: how to transfer an LVM Guest OS on KVM Lucid to another server

2010-10-04 Thread Dan Sheffner
Tapas,

There is a command virsh migrate --live instanceName
qemu+ssh://vmserver06/system.  Though I haven't had much luck with it.
Check out the last post in this forum:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1152271

The other option I have used is shutdown the virtual machine and just
manually move over the xml and the file that runs the virtual machine.

I would like to hear your take on any of this if you ever get it working
correctly across 3 or more machines.  The pain point is also having a shared
NFS location for each server running KVM.  I don't have any fancy SAN/NAS
devices so I/O through gigabyte ethernet is a concern when running many
virtual machine all trying to do disk I/O.

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.comwrote:



 I am searching for some information.
 I used virt-manager to create 4 guest OS on KVM.
 Let us call this server A
 I am running another server where KVM is running call this server B.
 Is is some how possible guest running on server A can be transferred to B
 so that I can run it and do not have to do any extra work.


 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Ubuntu server and cloud IRC consolidation

2010-08-11 Thread Dan Sheffner
I guess the only question I have is where do I ask questions about the KVM
hypervisor, virsh, and vmbuilder commands? #ubuntu-server or #ubuntu-cloud?
it would nice to have one room like #ubuntu-vm  for virtual machines that
would include xen, kvm, virsh, virtualbox, eucalyptus, etc.

Thanks,

Dan

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.netwrote:

  All suggested changes have been applied. I've changed topic on
  #ubuntu-cloud to remove the redirection to #ubuntu-server
  Regards

 Thanks Ahmed.

 --
 Gustavo Niemeyer
 http://niemeyer.net
 http://niemeyer.net/blog
 http://niemeyer.net/twitter

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: kvm briding and ubuntu

2010-07-30 Thread Dan Sheffner
Here is the script I'm using on my server with br0 and eth0.  The three
services I have running are https, http, and ssh.  I also have it setup so
you can forward traffic through the KVM server.  So basically the route of
the virtual machines is the ip of the KVM server and that passes the traffic
on to the public network.  I am also in the same boat about having only have
ssh access to the server.  What I do is schedule cron to reset iptables
every 30 min.  So when I do screw up ssh access and lock myself out I know
that every 30 min I can get back in.  Just don't forget that it does run
every 30 min and could run when you are testing :) Once you have iptables
correct remove the cronjob to reset iptables.  Hope this helps some.  Let me
know what you are trying to accomplish with your iptables.  eth0 is on the
public side and br0 is on the private side.  I also have my DNS servers on
both the private and public network.  Not having DNS on the private side is
a nightmare.

#!/bin/bash

#First we flush our current rules
iptables -F
iptables -t nat -F

#Setup default policies to handle unmatched traffic
iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT

#Copy and paste these examples ...
export LAN=br0
export WAN=eth0

#Then we lock our services so they only work from the LAN
iptables -I INPUT 1 -i ${LAN} -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT 1 -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p UDP --dport bootps -i ! ${LAN} -j REJECT
iptables -A INPUT -p UDP --dport domain -i ! ${LAN} -j REJECT

#(Optional) Allow access to our ssh server from the WAN
iptables -A INPUT -p TCP --dport ssh -i ${WAN} -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p TCP --dport http -i ${WAN} -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p TCP --dport https -i ${WAN} -j ACCEPT
#Drop TCP / UDP packets to privileged ports

#iptables -A INPUT -p TCP -i ! ${LAN} -d 0/0 --dport 0:1023 -j DROP
#iptables -A INPUT -p UDP -i ! ${LAN} -d 0/0 --dport 0:1023 -j DROP

#Finally we add the rules for NAT
iptables -I FORWARD -i ${LAN} -d 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -i ${LAN} -s 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -i ${WAN} -d 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${WAN} -j MASQUERADE

# Tell the kernel that ip forwarding is OK
echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter ; do echo 1  $f ; done


On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Henning Sprang henning.spr...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Jimmy,
 Can you be more specific and tell exactly what rules you add how to which
 interface, and what exactly happens then?
 Which packets stop going which way that they previously took and how do you
 meadure it?

 Henning

 Am 30.07.2010 09:24 schrieb Jimmy Stewpot mail...@oranged.to:


 Hello,

 I have a working environment where I have the following configuration. eth0
 is in the bridge br0. I then have a KVM virtual machine running perfectly. I
 now want to configure the host server (With br0) to have a set of iptables
 rules. Unfortunately every time I add any rules to the interface br0/eth0 i
 loose all connectivity despite having a permit/any/any rule for port 22. Can
 anyone provide any insight into why that would be the case?

 Regards,

 Jimmy.

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam


 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

vmbuilder strange outcome

2010-07-30 Thread Dan Sheffner
So I run this command with vmbuilder without tmpfs since I want this machine
persistent.

vmbuilder kvm ubuntu --suite=lucid --flavour=virtual --arch=amd64 --mirror=
http://192.168.1.4/ubuntu -o --libvirt=qemu:///system --ip=192.168.1.50
--gw=192.168.1.1 --part vmbuilder.partition --user=user --name=user
--pass=pass --addpkg=wget --addpkg=cron --addpkg=vim --addpkg=ntp
--addpkg=ntpdate --addpkg=ssh --addpkg=xvfb --addpkg=build-essential
--addpkg=linux-headers-virtual --addpkg=locate --addpkg=postfix
--addpkg=vpnc --addpkg=acpid --addpkg=clamav --addpkg=chkrootkit
--addpkg=rkhunter --addpkg=apache2 --addpkg=openssl  --mem=512
--hostname=vm00 --bridge=br0

I start the vm and it runs fine:

Then I start another vm that I want to do testing on with tmpfs:

vmbuilder kvm ubuntu --suite=lucid --flavour=virtual --arch=amd64 --mirror=
http://192.168.1.4/ubuntu -o --libvirt=qemu:///system --tmpfs=-
--ip=192.168.1.51 --gw=192.168.1.1 --part vmbuilder.partition --user=user
--name=user --pass=pass --addpkg=wget --addpkg=cron --addpkg=vim
--addpkg=ntp --addpkg=ntpdate --addpkg=ssh --addpkg=xvfb
--addpkg=build-essential --addpkg=linux-headers-virtual --addpkg=locate
--addpkg=postfix --addpkg=vpnc --addpkg=acpid --addpkg=clamav
--addpkg=chkrootkit --addpkg=rkhunter  --mem=512 --hostname=vm01
--bridge=br0

I start the vm and it runs fine as well.

I then do a reboot on the actual server running both virtual machines.  When
the server comes backup vm01 is running and vm00 is not.  Then when I try to
start vm00 I get:

 Id Name State
--
  1 vm01 running
  - vm00 shut off

virsh # start vm00
error: Failed to start domain vm00
error: monitor socket did not show up.: Connection refused

Maybe I'm missing something trivial.  Please let me know.

here is my /etc/libvirt/qemu/vm00.xml
domain type='kvm'
  namevm00/name
  uuid3b7c0ae2-0e01-f6a7-d25a-f830ebf743ee/uuid
  memory524288/memory
  currentMemory524288/currentMemory
  vcpu1/vcpu
  os
type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-0.12'hvm/type
boot dev='hd'/
  /os
  features
acpi/
  /features
  clock offset='utc'/
  on_poweroffdestroy/on_poweroff
  on_rebootrestart/on_reboot
  on_crashdestroy/on_crash
  devices
emulator/usr/bin/kvm/emulator
disk type='file' device='disk'
  source file='/root/ubuntu-kvm/tmpqDe91O.qcow2'/
  target dev='hda' bus='ide'/
/disk
disk type='file' device='disk'
  source file='/root/ubuntu-kvm/tmpDiQKxk.qcow2'/
  target dev='hdb' bus='ide'/
/disk
interface type='bridge'
  mac address='52:54:00:c0:77:0b'/
  source bridge='br0'/
  model type='virtio'/
/interface
input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/
graphics type='vnc' port='-1' autoport='yes' listen='127.0.0.1'/
video
  model type='cirrus' vram='9216' heads='1'/
/video
  /devices
/domain


and my vm01.xml

domain type='kvm'
  namevm01/name
  uuid8787828a-5312-b16a-b418-ff4aeb899cbd/uuid
  memory524288/memory
  currentMemory524288/currentMemory
  vcpu1/vcpu
  os
type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-0.12'hvm/type
boot dev='hd'/
  /os
  features
acpi/
  /features
  clock offset='utc'/
  on_poweroffdestroy/on_poweroff
  on_rebootrestart/on_reboot
  on_crashdestroy/on_crash
  devices
emulator/usr/bin/kvm/emulator
disk type='file' device='disk'
  source file='/root/ubuntu-kvm/tmppPDWFz.qcow2'/
  target dev='hda' bus='ide'/
/disk
disk type='file' device='disk'
  source file='/root/ubuntu-kvm/tmp3pp8px.qcow2'/
  target dev='hdb' bus='ide'/
/disk
interface type='bridge'
  mac address='52:54:00:37:07:d1'/
  source bridge='br0'/
  model type='virtio'/
/interface
input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/
graphics type='vnc' port='-1' autoport='yes' listen='127.0.0.1'/
video
  model type='cirrus' vram='9216' heads='1'/
/video
  /devices
/domain
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: vmbuilder strange outcome

2010-07-30 Thread Dan Sheffner
actually both files for vm00 are gone.  I also tried this again without
using tmpfs and got the same results.  It seems like creating the second vm
is deleting the files for the first vm.  Is this even possible?


On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
 wrote:

 Quoting Dan Sheffner (dsheff...@gmail.com):
  I then do a reboot on the actual server running both virtual machines.
  When
  the server comes backup vm01 is running and vm00 is not.  Then when I try
 to
  start vm00 I get:
 
   Id Name State
  --
1 vm01 running
- vm00 shut off
 
  virsh # start vm00
  error: Failed to start domain vm00
  error: monitor socket did not show up.: Connection refused

 Interesting - is there any helpful info under /var/log/libvirt?

  Maybe I'm missing something trivial.  Please let me know.

 Well it is possible that you are not in group libvirt, and
 that you couldn't manually start vm01 either?  It was
 auto-started after all.  What does 'groups' show?

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Ubuntu Server: Kernel Configuration Considerations

2010-06-30 Thread Dan Sheffner
I think you want:

d-i base-installer/kernel/override-image string linux-server

what do you have in your file for that?



On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 The issue is that we have built ubuntu using kickstart/tftp/pxe image
 on all the 300 servers. The issue is with the pxe server. We found out
 that the running Kernel on all the ubuntu hosts are 2.6.24-16-generic
 and not 2.6.24-16-server.

 Please suggest me whats the best way to set it to correctly to
 2.6.24-16-server on all the hosts running ubuntu 8.04 server(Hardy)

 Thanks and Regards

 Kaushal

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Ubuntu Server: Kernel Configuration Considerations

2010-06-30 Thread Dan Sheffner
you are using a preseed.cfg file right?

You want to have this in there:

# The kernel image (meta) package to be installed; none can be used if no
# kernel is to be installed.
#d-i base-installer/kernel/image linux-generic
d-i base-installer/kernel/override-image string linux-server

That is what picks which kernel is should be running I believe.

I have documented allot of the PXE boot stuff here:
https://www.digisoftinc.org/wiki/index.php/Ubuntu_preseed.cfg_installs_off_PXE_Boot

As far as fixing it on each machine that is beyond my expertise but I
believe you would have to get the ubuntu server kernel...compile it
and then add it to your grub list.
Sorry if you are looking for a direct fix for each server.


On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dan Sheffner dsheff...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think you want:
 
  d-i base-installer/kernel/override-image string linux-server
 
 Hi Dan

 d-i base-installer/kernel/override-image string linux-server ?

 is that a command. I didnot understand it.

 Please help me understand

 Thanks and Regards

 Kaushal

 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

vmbuilder with tmpfs

2010-06-29 Thread Dan Sheffner
Is anyone using the --tmpfs command with vmbuilder?  I'm using ubuntu 10.04
64 bit and I get:

 vmbuilder: error: no such option: --tmpfs

and it clearly in the docs here:

https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/jeos-and-vmbuilder.html
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: KVM failover to another KVM server

2009-05-08 Thread Dan Sheffner
Both machines have /etc/libvirt/qemu/ubuntuTest.xml present and I get the same 
error. Do I have to load the xml in the vmserver06 machine?





From: Matt Isaacs matthew.isa...@gmail.com
To: Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com
Cc: Mark Foster m...@foster.cc; ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 4:37:13 PM
Subject: Re: KVM failover to another KVM server

The XML config files have to be present on both servers.


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com wrote:

ok now I have three servers:

1) storage01
2) vmserver05 
3) vmserver06

storage01 one is sharing out /root/vm/ directory through NFS.

/root/vm from storage01 is mounted at /root/vm on both vmserver05 and 06.

I have created a kvm host on vmserver05 and when I do:

 migrate --live ubuntuTest qemu+ssh://vmserver06/system

error: operation failed: failed to parse XML

do I need to put the xml file on vmserver06? in the /root/vm directory?






From: Matt Isaacs matthew.isa...@gmail.com
To: Mark Foster m...@foster.cc
Cc: Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com; ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:07:37 PM

Subject: Re: KVM failover to another KVM server


DRBD is another nice solution to the shared storage issue.


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Mark Foster m...@foster.cc wrote:

The ability to do migration requires shared storage such as via iSCSI or
SAN or perhaps NAS (NFS).
The storage needs to be visible on both host nodes on the same path.



Dan Sheffner wrote:
 I have also tried with the virtual machine manager to migrate from one
 server to another.  It seems like it should work but nothing actually
 happens.

 
 *From:* Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com
 *To:* Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com
 *Cc:* ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 7, 2009 3:12:16 PM
 *Subject:* Re: KVM failover to another KVM server



 On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com

 mailto:theshef...@yahoo.com wrote:


 Ok I have gotten close but still having issues.  I have two
 machines running ubuntu 9.04 server AMD and I'm trying to fail
 from one machine to another with:

 connected to virsh console:

 migrate ubuntuTest qemu+ssh://vmserver06.ttr/system
 error: operation failed: failed to parse XML

 any ideas?



 - Original Message 
 From: Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com

 mailto:theshef...@yahoo.com
 To: ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com

 mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
 Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:31:34 AM
 Subject: KVM failover to another KVM server

 I searched hi ahd low but I haven't been able to find how to fail
 a virtual machine from one KVM server to another.  Can someone
 link me to the doc that does this or show me an example.  I would
 hope you are able to do this while the server is running. Thanks
 in advance.




 --
 ubuntu-server mailing list
 ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com

 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
 More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam



 Proxmox is debian based KVM's bare installer and does have that
 function(Clustering).

 http://pve.proxmox.com

 --
 It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

 Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o
 mediocremente servidas



--

ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam


  -- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

KVM failover to another KVM server

2009-05-07 Thread Dan Sheffner

I searched hi ahd low but I haven't been able to find how to fail a virtual 
machine from one KVM server to another.  Can someone link me to the doc that 
does this or show me an example.  I would hope you are able to do this while 
the server is running. Thanks in advance.



  

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam


Re: KVM failover to another KVM server

2009-05-07 Thread Dan Sheffner

Ok I have gotten close but still having issues.  I have two machines running 
ubuntu 9.04 server AMD and I'm trying to fail from one machine to another with:

connected to virsh console:

migrate ubuntuTest qemu+ssh://vmserver06.ttr/system
error: operation failed: failed to parse XML

any ideas?



- Original Message 
From: Dan Sheffner theshef...@yahoo.com
To: ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:31:34 AM
Subject: KVM failover to another KVM server

I searched hi ahd low but I haven't been able to find how to fail a virtual 
machine from one KVM server to another.  Can someone link me to the doc that 
does this or show me an example.  I would hope you are able to do this while 
the server is running. Thanks in advance.


  

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam


ubuntu 9.04 AMD Server Ed HP DL140

2009-05-05 Thread Dan Sheffner

Hello,

I just had a quick question about which option should I pick during the install 
of the ubuntu server ed.  I'm turning my HP DL 140 into a KVM Server for 
virtual hosts.  Would the default install be the best option or should I press 
F4 and select minimum install or minimal virtual machine?  I'm little confused 
by the term minimum virtual machine?  is this for the operating system running 
as a KVM server or the option you should pick when you are installing the os 
within the virtual environment?  


  

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam