Re: Ubuntu Studio precise pangolin 12.04.1 RCs on ISO tracker

2012-08-21 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hi guys.

We really need some assistance in testing for the Ubuntu Studio 12.04.1 RC
images.

I saw in the ISO QA Tracker [0] today and I found that only me and
len-ovenwerks (len-dt on Freenode) have tested the Ubuntu Studio images
till today. This is not enough to build a strong report. We need more
people to ensure the build is bug-free before we release it on 23/8/2013. :)

If you do have time, please help to test the ISO images before releasing in
Thursday. Report your results in the ISO QA Tracker. We don't enforce you
to help, but by testing it you would have helped the Ubuntu Studio team an
awful lot.

We need your support. :)

Please go to the Freenode IRC channels listed in [1] to find support on
testing.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw @ Freenode)

[0] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds
[1]: #ubuntu-qa, #ubuntustudio and #ubuntustudio-devel on irc.freenode.net

2012/8/19 Janne Jokitalo astralj...@kapsi.fi

 Hi,

 we once again need your assistance on the release candidates of our first
 point
 release of precise pangolin, 12.04.1. The testing is tracked on the ISO
 tracker
 [0], and as usual, we have the dvd image for both archs (i386 and amd64).

 If you have time, please help us make sure the images are of the usual
 ubuntu
 quality. :) Should you have questions or problems, please do not hesitate
 to
 voice them by responding to this email, or on the IRC chatrooms [1].

 Looking forward to your contributions, huge thanks in advance!

 [0]: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds
 [1]: #ubuntustudio and #ubuntustudio-devel on irc.freenode.net


 Best regards,

 --
 Jaska (astraljava on freenode.net)


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

 iEYEARECAAYFAlAw6yoACgkQxgcH0NnJT+A8rQCeITg4TAMBfUD6rVYOmhXDrsAp
 PlkAn0qm6k3+b231dsG+XBw9SR5/T+pq
 =2iNN
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Ubuntu Studio precise pangolin 12.04.1 RCs on ISO tracker

2012-08-21 Thread Stuart McQuade
I actually downloaded the ISO yesterday and am intending to test it tomorrow. 
If you didn't see my download, does this mean I took it from the wrong place?

I used this link: 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/precise/dvd/20120818/precise-dvd-i386.iso


Stuart

On 21 Aug 2012, at 15:28, Ho Wan Chan wrote:

 Hi guys.
  
 We really need some assistance in testing for the Ubuntu Studio 12.04.1 RC 
 images.
  
 I saw in the ISO QA Tracker [0] today and I found that only me and 
 len-ovenwerks (len-dt on Freenode) have tested the Ubuntu Studio images till 
 today. This is not enough to build a strong report. We need more people to 
 ensure the build is bug-free before we release it on 23/8/2013. :)
  
 If you do have time, please help to test the ISO images before releasing in 
 Thursday. Report your results in the ISO QA Tracker. We don't enforce you to 
 help, but by testing it you would have helped the Ubuntu Studio team an awful 
 lot.
  
 We need your support. :)
  
 Please go to the Freenode IRC channels listed in [1] to find support on 
 testing.
  
 Regards,
 Howard Chan (smartboyhw @ Freenode)
  
 [0] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds
 [1]: #ubuntu-qa, #ubuntustudio and #ubuntustudio-devel on irc.freenode.net
 
 2012/8/19 Janne Jokitalo astralj...@kapsi.fi
 Hi,
 
 we once again need your assistance on the release candidates of our first 
 point
 release of precise pangolin, 12.04.1. The testing is tracked on the ISO 
 tracker
 [0], and as usual, we have the dvd image for both archs (i386 and amd64).
 
 If you have time, please help us make sure the images are of the usual ubuntu
 quality. :) Should you have questions or problems, please do not hesitate to
 voice them by responding to this email, or on the IRC chatrooms [1].
 
 Looking forward to your contributions, huge thanks in advance!
 
 [0]: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds
 [1]: #ubuntustudio and #ubuntustudio-devel on irc.freenode.net
 
 
 Best regards,
 
 --
 Jaska (astraljava on freenode.net)
 
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAlAw6yoACgkQxgcH0NnJT+A8rQCeITg4TAMBfUD6rVYOmhXDrsAp
 PlkAn0qm6k3+b231dsG+XBw9SR5/T+pq
 =2iNN
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
 
 
 -- 
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: [Bug 1029767] [NEW] help button in preferences points to invalid page

2012-08-21 Thread Emmet Hikory
Len Ovens wrote:
 I've switched this over from nautilus to ubuntustudio-meta because we are
 missing the package that makes this work (ubuntu-docs). However, I tried
 installing that package and when selecting help from nautilus it does show
 nautilus docs but at the top it has a desktop button that goes to an all
 unity page. I don't know which is better, no docs or extra wrong docs.
 Obviously the best thing would be to have a ubuntustudio-docs package, but
 that would require upkeep... more than our average :)  A script that takes
 the ubuntu-docs pkg and auto creates a package with just what we need in
 it would be nice, but I don't know how doable.

Perhaps a very minimal ubuntustudio-docs package would work for this,
including only those files necessary to launch help, with pointers from
the default page to the workflow documentation on the wiki?  This would
also become a good place for us to document the essential ideas of the
workflows and special menus, etc., which might otherwise be confusing for
users coming from some backgrounds.

Once written, we ought not need to change that much, except where there
are signficant changes to the basic environment (e.g. changing default
desktop environment), or where there are changes in the underlying software
(e.g. new location for default help file): I wouldn't expect this to mean
more than one or two changes per cycle, until someone gets sufficiently
excited about our documentation to maintain it more closely, with more
content, etc.

-- 
Emmet HIKORY

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel